McMaster_Portfolio

AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works

PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE | Summary BuroMilan Facade After a career break I joined BuroMilan Facade, a facade consulting firm established Spring 2024 in partnership with BuroMilan, a structural consulting firm based out of Milan, Italy. Project work primarily focused on coordination with facade contractors.

Work ranged from assisting in the creation to tender packages with quantity take-offs, preliminary system details to developing shop drawings for construction.

Project List Trojena with WeBuild | Neom, Saudi Arabia | 2024 Tiffany with Tensoforma | Toronto, Canada | 2024 Tiffany with Tensoforma | Taipei City, Taiwan | 2024 Tiffany Institutional Concept Book with Tiffany | 2024 1075 Nelson with WKK Architects | Vancouver, Canada | 2023

Front Inc. Prior to working with BuroMilan Facade, I spent five years based in London to help open Front Inc›s UK office and work on a number of international projects ranging in program and scale. Most recently, I led a team through Design Assist for a tower in Vancouver, Canada in collaboration with the facade contractor, client, and architects to develop facade systems for, when constructed, the tallest Passive House project ever built. Before moving to London, I worked in New York City at Front Inc. for three years on a number of local and national projects with widely ranging levels of facade complexity, system design, and performance requirements.

To the right is a list of projects I worked on during my time at both companies. Marked with dashes are the projects which have been expanded on in the following pages.

Bulgari Tower with ACPV | Dubai, UAE | 2022 MDP with RPBW | Milan, Italy | 2022 Milano Campus Nord with RPBW | Milan, Italy | 2022 Gulf of Aqaba Mansions with Steven Chilton Architects | 2022 ISMETT 2 with RPBW | Palermo, Italy | 2021 109 Brookline with Gensler | Boston, MA | 2021, Under Construction Taikoo Ceiling with Tiller Studio | Hong Kong | 2021 Volvo Showroom with SO-IL | Seoul, Korea | 2021, Completed Colechurch House with Foster + Partners | London, UK | 2020 Tselinnyi Cultural Centre with Asif Khan | Almaty, Kazakhstan | 2020 Taichung Green Museumbrary with SANAA | Taiwan | 2020, Under Construction Dior with Aranda/Lasch | Doha, Qatar | 2019, Completed Phnom Penh Int’l Airport with Foster + Partners | Phnom Penh, Cambodia | 2019, Under Construction

Additional Professional Experience

Lusail Towers with Foster + Partners | Lusail, Qatar | 2018, Completed

VA | Design in Atlanta, GA Collaborator | 2014-2015

Longwood Gardens with Weiss/Manfredi | Kennett Square, PA | 2018, Under Construction 30 Warren with Post-Office Architectes | New York, NY | 2018, Completed 712 Fifth Ave with KPF | New York, NY | 2018, Completed

MALL in Atlanta, GA Collaborator | 2014-2015

1100 Sixth Ave with MdeAS Architects | New York, NY | 2018, Under Construction S. Pellegrine Flagship Factory with BIG | New York, NY | 2018, Under Construction Pendry Hotel with SOM | New York, NY | 2017, Completed

Academic Experience

Yale CIT with Weiss/Manfredi | New Haven, CT | 2017, Completed

Georgia Institute of Technology | School of Architecture Research Assistant | 2013-2015 Teaching Assistant | 2015

Confidential Tower | Dubai, UAE | 2017

Perth+ with REX | Perth, Australia | 2017 GD Office Building with LSM | Falls Church, VA | 2017, Completed 262 Fifth Ave with Meganom | New York, NY | 2016 Under Construction

Georgia Institute of Technology | School of Architecture Graduate Studio Review | Fall 2015, Spring 2017, Spring 2020 Coventry University | School of Architecture Studio Review | Spring 2020, Spring 2021, Fall 2021, Spring 2022 Guest Lecturer | Fall 2020, Fall 2021, Fall 2022

Collegiate Tower with BIG | New York, NY | 2016 Under Construction Lloyd Harbor Residence with REX | Long Island, NY | 2016 Under Construction Georgia Tech HPC Center with John Portman & Associates | Atlanta, GA | 2016, Completed Spence School with Rogers Partners | New York, NY | 2016, Completed 1 John Street with Alloy | New York, NY | 2015, Completed Victoria’s Secret Lippo Plaza with O’Neil Langan Architects | Shanghai, China | 2015, Completed Victoria’s Secret 5th Ave with O’Neil Langan Architects | New York, NY | 2015, Completed Google Campus with BIG / Heatherwick Studio | Mountain View, CA | 2015

AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works

SELECTED WORKS | 1075 Nelson - CURV

1075 Nelson - CURV Location: Vancouver, Canada Architect: WKK Architects Role: Senior Associate Scope: Design Assist Responsibilities included: - Project management (internal and external) - Coordination with Architects, Client, Executive Architects and related consultants - System detailing and development in 2D (AutoCAD) and 3D (Rhino3D) - Thermal analysis to EN standards on the basis of achieving Passivhaus Certification - Material and system research - Shop drawing review

AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works

SELECTED WORKS | 1075 Nelson - CURV Preliminary System Design Project systems included terraces and megapanel units. Because the two facade systems are traditionally loaded differently (base and top, respectively), studies to minimise differential movement was key to ensure an air-tight system that met the Passive House requirements. As a preliminary study, the stack joint for the megapanel was evaluated in a series of details to discuss with the design team. Ultimately, Option 3 was selected.

System SystemDesign Design| |Stack StackJoint JointStudies Studies APPROVE APPROVE D DOPTION OPTION

System SystemDesign Design| |Stack StackJoint JointStudies Studies APPROVE OPTION APPROVE D DOPTION

System SystemDesign Design| |Stack StackJoint JointStudies Studies APPROVE OPTION APPROVE D DOPTION

INF INF MPA MPA INF INF MPA MPA

INF INF MPA MPA

OPTION OPTION1 1| STACK | STACKJOI JOI NT NTATATVIVI S ION S IONPAN PAN E L, E L,H H UU NG NG • • Megapanel Megapanel is is hung hung from from thethe toptop ofof slab slab similar similar to to a unitized a unitized system system • • Transition Transition between between megapanels megapanels and and infill infill panels panels at at thethe balconies balconies require require OPTION OPTION 1 1| STACK | STACK JOI JOI NT NT AT ATVIVI S ION S IONPAN PAN E L, E L,H H UU NG NG consideration consideration forfor differential differential movements movements • • Stack Stack joint joint requires requires custom custom solution solution ofof Wicona's Wicona's passivhaus-certified passivhaus-certified syssys• • Megapanel Megapanel is is hung hung from from thethe toptop of slab slab similar similar to to a unitized a unitized system systemto to tem tem (separately, (separately, customization customization ofof of standard standard window window system system required required ac-ac• • Transition Transition between between megapanels megapanels and and infill infill panels panels at at the the balconies balconies require require commodate commodate slope slope at at allall locations) locations) consideration for for differential differential movements movements • • consideration The Thehorizontal horizontal spandrel spandrel is issupported supported directly directlyback backto tomegapanel megapanelframe frame OPTION 1 1 | STACK | STACK JOI JOI NT NT AT ATVIVI S S ION PAN PAN Epassivhaus-certified L, E L,H H UU NG NG sys• OPTION • Stack Stack joint joint requires requires custom custom solution solution ofION of Wicona's Wicona's passivhaus-certified syswithout without additional additional cantilevering cantilevering tem tem (separately, (separately, customization customization standard standard window window system system required required to to ac-ac• • *Stack *Stack joint joint follows follows glass glass line lineofof • • Megapanel Megapanel isslope is hung hung from the the toptop ofof slab slab similar similar to to a unitized a unitized system system commodate commodate slope atfrom at all all locations) locations) • • The The stack stack joint joint sits sits proud proud ofof insulation insulation which which may may impact impact thermal thermal perforperfor•• •• Transition Transition between between megapanels megapanels and and infill infill panels panels at at the balconies balconies require require The Thehorizontal horizontal spandrel spandrel is issupported supported directly directly back back tothe tomegapanel megapanel frame frame mance mance consideration consideration for for differential differential movements movements without without additional additional cantilevering cantilevering •• •• Stack Stack joint joint requires requires custom custom solution solution of of Wicona's Wicona's passivhaus-certified passivhaus-certified syssys*Stack *Stack joint joint follows follows glass glass line line tem (separately, (separately, customization customization of of standard standard window window system system required required toperforto ac-ac• • tem The The stack stack joint joint sits sits proud proud ofof insulation insulation which which may may impact impact thermal thermal perforcommodate commodate slope slope at at allall locations) locations) mance mance • • The Thehorizontal horizontalspandrel spandrelis issupported supporteddirectly directlyback backto tomegapanel megapanelframe frame without without additional additional cantilevering cantilevering 1075 1075 N E N LSON E LSON STR STR E ET E ET • • *Stack *Stack joint joint follows follows glass glass line line CONCE CONCE PTPT DESIG DESIG NN R ERPORT E PORT | R| EV R EV 0000 • • The The stack stack joint joint sits sits proud proud ofof insulation insulation which which may may impact impact thermal thermal perforperformance mance 1075 1075 N ENLSON E LSON STR STR E ET E ET CONCE CONCE PTPT DESIG DESIG NN R ERPORT E PORT | R| EV R EV 0000

1075 1075 N ENLSON E LSON STR STR E ET E ET CONCE CONCE PTPT DESIG DESIG NN R ERPORT E PORT | R| EV R EV 0000

OPTION OPTION2 2| STACK | STACKJOI JOI NT NTI NI N S ISDE I DEPAN PAN E L, E L,H H UU NG NG

OPTION OPTION3 3| STACK | STACKJOI JOI NT NTI NI N S ISDE I DEPAN PAN E L, E L,BAS BAS E-S E-S UU PPORTE PPORTE DD

• • Megapanel Megapanel is is hung hung from from thethe toptop ofof slab slab similar similar to to a unitized a unitized system system • • Transition Transition between between megapanels megapanels and and infill infill panels panels at at thethe balconies balconies require require OPTION OPTION 2 2| STACK | STACK JOI JOI NT NT Imovements NI N S ISDE I DEPAN PAN E L, E L,H H UU NG NG consideration consideration forfor differential differential movements • • Stack Stack joint joint is is a custom a custom extrusion extrusion that that is is divorced divorced from from thethe window window system system • • Megapanel Megapanel is is hung hung from from thethe toptop ofof of slab slab similar similar to to a unitized a unitized system system and andrequires requires no no customization customization of Wicona's Wicona's passivhaus-certified passivhaus-certified system system • • Transition Transition between between megapanels megapanels and and infill infill panels panels at at the the balconies balconies require require (separately, (separately, customization customization ofof standard standard window window system system required required to to accomaccomconsideration consideration for differential differential movements movements modate modate slope slope at for at all all locations) locations) OPTION 2 joint 2| STACK |is STACK JOI JOI NT NTI NI N S IS DE Ivertically DE PAN PAN E L, Ewill L,will Hintroduce H Uthe U NG NG Stack joint is aspandrel custom aspandrel custom extrusion extrusion that that is is divorced divorced from from the window window system system •• OPTION •• Stack The The horizontal horizontal cantilevers cantilevers vertically and and introduce installation installation and andrequires requiresnonocustomization customizationofofWicona's Wicona'spassivhaus-certified passivhaus-certifiedsystem system complexities complexities • • Megapanel Megapanel is is hung hung from from the the top top ofof slab slab similar similar to to a unitized a unitized system system (separately, (separately, customization customization of of standard standard window window system required required to to accomaccom• • *Stack *Stack joint joint follows follows megapanel megapanel frame's frame's line line system • • Transition Transition between between megapanels megapanels and and infill infill panels panels at at thethe balconies balconies require require modate modate slope slope atsits at allsits all locations) locations) • • The The stack stack joint joint inboard inboard ofof insulation insulation which which may may improve improve thermal thermal perperconsideration consideration for for differential differential movements movements • • formance The The horizontal horizontal spandrel spandrel cantilevers cantilevers vertically vertically and and willwill introduce introduce installation installation formance • • Stack Stack joint joint is is a custom a custom extrusion extrusion that that is is divorced divorced from from the the window window system system complexities complexities and requires requires no nocustomization customization offrame's ofWicona's Wicona's passivhaus-certifiedsystem system • • and *Stack *Stack joint joint follows follows megapanel megapanel frame's line line passivhaus-certified (separately, customization customization ofof of standard standard window window system system required required to to accomaccom• • (separately, The The stack stack joint joint sits sits inboard inboard of insulation insulation which which may may improve improve thermal thermal perpermodate modate slope slope at at allall locations) locations) formance formance • • The The horizontal horizontal spandrel spandrel cantilevers cantilevers vertically vertically and and willwill introduce introduce installation installation complexities complexities • • *Stack *Stack joint joint follows follows megapanel megapanel frame's frame's line line • • The The stack stack joint joint sits sits inboard inboard ofof insulation insulation which which may may improve improve thermal thermal perperformance formance

• • Megapanel Megapanel is is base-supported base-supported from from thethe toptop ofof slab slab which which introduces introduces instalinstallation lation complexities complexities OPTION 3 3| STACK | STACK JOI JOI NT NTI at NI at N Seach ISeach DE I DE PAN PAN Eare L, Esupported L, BAS BAS E-S E-S U PPORTE PPORTE • OPTION • Megapanels Megapanels and andinfill infill panels panels level level are supported offU offthe the same sameD D slab, slab, allowing allowing forfor simpler simpler transition transition between between systems systems •• •• Megapanel Megapanel base-supported from from thethe top ofof slab slab which which introduces introduces instalinstalStack Stack joint joint isisis ais custom abase-supported custom extrusion extrusion that that istop is divorced divorced from from thethe window window system system lation lation complexities complexities and andrequires requires nonocustomization customizationofofWicona's Wicona'spassivhaus-certified passivhaus-certifiedsystem system • • Megapanels Megapanels and andinfill infillpanels panels at ateach each level levelare are supported supported offoff the the same same (separately, (separately, customization customization ofof standard standard window window system system required required to to accomaccomOPTION OPTION 3allowing 3| slope STACK | STACK JOI JOI NT NTI NI N Sbetween ISDE I DEPAN PAN E L, E L,BAS BAS E-S E-S UU PPORTE PPORTE DD slab, slab, allowing for simpler simpler transition transition between systems systems modate modate slope atfor at all all locations) locations) Stack Stack joint joint is is aspandrel custom aspandrel custom extrusion extrusion that that is is divorced divorced from from the the window window system system •• •• The The horizontal horizontal cantilevers cantilevers vertically vertically and and will will introduce introduce installation installation • • and Megapanel Megapanel is is base-supported base-supported from from the the toptop ofof slab slab which which introduces introduces instalinstaland requires requires no no customization customization of ofWicona's Wicona's passivhaus-certified passivhaus-certified system system complexities complexities lation lation complexities complexities (separately, (separately, customization customization ofof standard standard window window system required required to to accomaccom• • *Stack *Stack joint joint follows follows megapanel megapanel frame's frame's line line system • • modate Megapanels Megapanels and infill infill panels panelsat ateach eachlevel levelare aresupported supportedoffoffthe thesame same modate slope slope atand at allsits all locations) locations) • • The The stack stack joint joint sits inboard inboard ofof insulation insulation which which may may improve improve thermal thermal perperslab, slab, allowing allowing for for simpler simpler transition transition between between systems systems • • formance The The horizontal horizontal spandrel spandrel cantilevers cantilevers vertically vertically and and willwill introduce introduce installation installation formance • • complexities Stack Stack joint joint is is a custom a custom extrusion extrusion that that is is divorced divorced from from the the window window system system complexities and andrequires requires no nocustomization customization offrame's ofWicona's Wicona's passivhaus-certifiedsystem system • • *Stack *Stack joint joint follows follows megapanel megapanel frame's line line passivhaus-certified (separately, (separately, customization customization ofof of standard standard window window system system required required to to accomaccom• • The The stack stack joint joint sits sits inboard inboard of insulation insulation which which may may improve improve thermal thermal perpermodate modate slope slope at at allall locations) locations) formance formance • • The The horizontal horizontal spandrel spandrel cantilevers cantilevers vertically vertically and and willwill introduce introduce installation installation complexities complexities • • *Stack *Stack joint joint follows follows megapanel megapanel frame's frame's line line • • The The stack stack joint joint sits sits inboard inboard ofof insulation insulation which which may may improve improve thermal thermal perperformance formance Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Director Director Mr.Mr. John John Douglas Douglas Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Technical Technical Director Director Director Director Mr.Mr. John John Mr.Mr. Julien Julien Kempf Kempf Douglas Douglas

Project Proje Mr.Mr. Eam Ea

Construction Construction Manager Manager Mr.Mr. Conor Conor Houlihan Houlihan

Project Proje HSH Mr.Mr. Eam Ea

Construction Construction AINSLEY MCMASTER |Package Selected Works Technical Technical Director Director Design Design Team Team - Manager Manager Mr.Mr. Conor ConorManager– Package Manager Manager Package Package Manager–HSH Pre-Construction Pre-Construction Front Front Mr.Mr. Julien Julien Kempf Kempf Director Director Mr.Mr. John John Douglas Douglas

Houlihan Houlihan

Project Proje Mr.Mr. Eam Ea

SELECTED WORKS | 1075 Nelson - CURV

Level 11 H e at fl u x fro m T h e rm [ W /m 2 ]

D e scri p ti o n

D e ta i l N a m e

T h e rm F i l e N am e D e scri p ti o n

Preliminary Thermal Analysis To vet the system design and expected thermal performance, preliminary thermal analysis was done across iterations of the system design and in consideration of the varaible floor plates. To the right is an example of the early studies before a full buildingwide assembly performance was undertaken.

WT H e at fl u x fro m T h e rm [ W /m 2 ]

Therm Length

L2D [ W /m ]

h

L 2 D = W Txh

Therm Length

L2D [ W /m ]

Pa n e l 1 C e n te r o f g l a ss o r p a n e l th e rm a l tra n sm i tta n ce [ W /m 2 K]

Pa n e l 2 C e n te r o f g l a ss o r p a n e l th e rm a l tra n sm i tta n ce [ W /m 2 K]

Pa n e l 1 d i m e n si o n [ m ]

PaU ne1l 1 C e n te r o f g l a ss o r p a n e l th e rm a l tra n sm i tta n ce [ W /m 2 K]

PaU ne2l 2 C e n te r o f g l a ss o r p a n e l th e rm a l tra n sm i tta n ce [ W /m 2 K]

L1

L1

Pa n e l 1 d i m e n si o n [ m ]

Pa n e l 2 d i m e n si o n [ m ]

Pa n e l 2 d i m e n si o n [ m ]

L i n e a r th e rm a l tra n sm i tta n ce [ W /m K]

F ram e l e n g th [m]

Pa n e l Are a [m2]

G l a ss U O v e ral l UH eat F lux V alue V alue [ W /K] [ W /m 2 K] [ W /m 2 K]

Ѱ= = (W2 D( U 1 xL 1 + U 2 xL 2 )x L ine2a0r)t/h2e0rm al tra n sm i tta n ce [ W /m K]

l F ram e l e n g th [m]

A Pa n e l Are a [m2]

W=Ѱxxl or U=∑W W/∑ Ug W = U g xA A G l a ss U O v e ral l UH eat F lux V alue V alue [ W /K] [ W /m 2 K] [ W /m 2 K]

l

A

Level 11

12.05

0.55

h

L 2 D = W Txh

6.57

0.56

0.11

0.287

0.258

L1

Ѱ= = (W2 D( U 1 xL 1 + U 2 xL 2 )x 20.14 0 )/2 0

4.45

MP_Section 1B Vision_Sill.THM

12.05

0.55

6.57

0.56

0.11

0.287

0.258

0.14

4.45

0.62

MP_Section 2B Vision_Head

MP_Section 2B Vision_Head.THM

9.36

0.94

8.75

0.56

0.11

0.242

0.693

0.23

4.45

1.01

LEVE L 11

MP_Section 2B Vision_Head

MP_Section 2B Vision_Head.THM

9.36

0.94

8.75

0.56

0.11

0.242

0.693

0.23

4.45

1.01

Because of symmetry at each floorplate, analyzing a single quadrant will provide U-value performance for the entire floor. Final LEVE 11be developed as a building-wide study using the project wireframe to absorb slight variabilities in area take-off, analysisL will frame lengths, and glass angle.floorplate, analyzing a single quadrant will provide U-value performance for the entire floor. Final Because of symmetry at each

MP_Section 3 Opaque_Sill

MP_Section 3 Opaque_Sill.THM

4.27

0.87

3.71

0.11

0.11

0.250

0.620

0.09

12.34

1.11

MP_Section 3 Opaque_Sill

MP_Section 3 Opaque_Sill.THM

4.27

0.87

3.71

0.11

0.11

0.250

0.620

0.09

12.34

1.11

MP_Section 4 Opaque_Head

MP_Section 4 Opaque_Head.THM

3.34

0.55

1.84

0.11

0.11

0.220

0.330

0.03

12.34

0.39

MP_Section 4 Opaque_Head

MP_Section 4 Opaque_Head.THM

3.34

0.55

1.84

0.11

0.11

0.220

0.330

0.03

12.34

0.39

0.56

0.11

0.220

0.330

0.16

13.50

2.20

6.45

0.56

0.11

0.220

0.330

0.16

13.50

2.20

1.83

0.11

0.11

0.300

0.300

0.03

0.00

0.00

Thermal Analysis | Level 11 Thermal Analysis Thermal Analysis | Level 11 Thermal Analysis

analysis will be developed as a building-wide study using the project wireframe to absorb slight variabilities in area take-off, Preliminary Assembly Performance: frame lengths, and glass angle.

0.49 W/m2K Preliminary Assembly Performance: Target Assembly Performance: 0.49 W/m2K 0.44 W/m2K

D e ta i l N a m e MP_Section 1B Vision_Sill

TMP_Section herm F ile Na1B me

MP_Section 1B Vision_Sill

Vision_Sill.THM

WT

Where balcony to be removed, placeholder values have MP_Section 5 MP_Section been inserted into the5Bthermal model; however, impact 6.45 Vertical_Vision 11.72 0.55 Vertical_Vision Edge Edge.THM to assembly will be contingent design intent andhave Where balcony to be removed, on placeholder values system required to the meet performance criteria impact MP_Section 5 MP_Section 5B been inserted into thermal model; however,

Target Assembly Performance: 11.3% over target 0.44 W/m2K

Vertical_Vision Edge

Vertical_Vision Edge.THM

11.72

0.55

to assembly will be contingent on design intent and MP_Section 6 MP_Section 6 Vertical_Opaque 3.06 0.60 system requiredVertical_Opaque to meet COP performance criteria COP.THM

U2

U1

L1

Ug

W=Ѱxxl or U=∑W W/∑ W= U g xA A 0.62

1

11.3% over target

1 MP_Section 6 Vertical_Opaque COP

2

EDGE

D e scri p ti o n

D e ta i l N a m e 2

EDGE

MP_Section 6 Vertical_Opaque COP.THM

n/a

T h e rm F i l e N am e D e scri p ti o n

n/a INF_Section

INF_Section Detai l N am e1B MP_Section 1B_Operable Vision_SillHead

TMP_Section h1B_Operable erm F i l e N a1B me

INF_Section MP_Section 1B 1B_Operable Vision_SillHead

INF_Section MP_Section 1B 1B_Operable Vision_Sill.THM Head.THM

Vision_Sill.THM Head.THM

3.06

0.60

1.83

H e at fl u x fro m T8.54 h e rm [ W /m 2 ]

Therm Length 0.87

7.43 [W /m ]

0.11

0.11

0.300

0.300

0.03

0.00

Pa n e l 1 C e n te r o f g l a ss o r pane0.11 l th e rm a l tra n sm i tta n ce [ W /m 2 K]

Pa n e l 2 C e n te r o f g l a ss o r pane0.11 l th e rm a l tra n sm i tta n ce [ W /m 2 K]

Pa n e l 1 di m e0.250 n si o n [ m ]

Pa n e l 2 di m e0.620 n si o n [ m ]

L i n e a r th e rm a l trans0.28 m i tta n ce [ W /m K]

F ram e l13.25 e n g th [m]

Pa n e l Are a [m2]

G l a ss U O v e ral l UH eat F lux V alue V alue 3.65 [W /K] [ W /m 2 K] [ W /m 2 K]

0.00

Ѱ= = (W2 D( U 1 xL 1 + U 2 xL 2 )x L i ne2a0r)t/h2e0rm al trans0.28 m i tta n ce [ W /m K]

l F ram e l13.25 e n g th [m]

A Pa n e l Are a [m2]

W =Ѱxxl or U=∑W W/∑ Ug W = U g xA A G l a ss U O v e ral l UH eat F lux V alue V alue 3.65 [W /K] [ W /m 2 K] [ W /m 2 K]

Ѱ= = (W2 D(U1 xL 10.31 + U 2 xL 2 )x 20.14 0 )/2 0

l 5.75 4.45

A

Level 11

WT H e at fl u x fro m T8.54 h e rm [ W /m 2 ]

L2D

Level 11

h

L 2 D = W Txh

PaU ne2l 2 C e n te r o f g l a ss o r pane0.11 l th e rm a l tra n sm i tta n ce [ W /m 2 K]

L1

L2D 7.43 [W /m ]

PaU ne1l 1 C e n te r o f g l a ss o r pane0.11 l th e rm a l tra n sm i tta n ce [ W /m 2 K]

L1

Therm Length 0.87

Pa n e l 1 di m e0.250 n si o n [ m ]

Pa n e l 2 di m e0.620 n si o n [ m ]

h 0.80 0.55

L 211.87 D = W Txh

U1 0.56 0.56

U2 0.11 0.11

L1 0.431 0.287

L1 0.369 0.258

14.83 12.05

0.80 0.55

11.87 6.57

0.56 0.56

0.11 0.11

0.431 0.287

0.369 0.258

0.31 0.14

5.75 4.45

1.80 0.62

22.80

0.40

9.12

0.11

0.56

0.120

0.280

0.29

1.10

0.31

WT 14.83 12.05

6.57

Ug

W =Ѱxxl or U=∑W W/∑ 1.80 W= U g xA A 0.62

Level 11 H e at fl u x fro m T h e rm [ W /m 2 ]

D e scri p ti o n

D e ta i l N a m e

T h e rm F i l e N am e D e scri p ti o n

Detai l N am e1B MP_Section Vision_Sill

MP_Section 1B Vision_Sill

WT H e at fl u x fro m T h e rm [ W /m 2 ]

TMP_Section herm F i l e N a1B me

Vision_Sill.THM

MP_Section 1B Vision_Sill.THM

WT

12.05

12.05

Therm Length

L2D [ W /m ]

h

L 2 D = W Txh

Therm Length

L2D [ W /m ]

h

0.55

0.55

L 2 D = W Txh

6.57

6.57

Pa n e l 1 C e n te r o f g l a ss o r p a n e l th e rm a l tra n sm i tta n ce [ W /m 2 K]

Pa n e l 2 C e n te r o f g l a ss o r p a n e l th e rm a l tra n sm i tta n ce [ W /m 2 K]

PaU ne1l 1 C e n te r o f g l a ss o r p a n e l th e rm a l tra n sm i tta n ce [ W /m 2 K]

PaU ne2l 2 C e n te r o f g l a ss o r p a n e l th e rm a l tra n sm i tta n ce [ W /m 2 K]

U1

0.56

0.56

U2

0.11

0.11

Pa n e l 1 d i m e n si o n [ m ]

Pa n e l 2 d i m e n si o n [ m ]

L1

L1

Pa n e l 1 d i m e n si o n [ m ]

Pa n e l 2 d i m e n si o n [ m ]

L1

0.287

0.287

L1

0.258

0.258

L i n e a r th e rm a l tra n sm i tta n ce [ W /m K] Ѱ= = (W2 D( U 1 xL 1 + U 2 xL 2 )x L i ne2a0r)t/h2e0rm al tra n sm i tta n ce [ W /m K] Ѱ= = (W2 D( U 1 xL 1 + U 2 xL 2 )x 20.14 0 )/2 0

0.14

F ram e l e n g th [m]

Pa n e l Are a [m2]

G l a ss U O v e ral l UH eat F lux V alue V alue [ W /K] [ W /m 2 K] [ W /m 2 K]

Level 11

l F ram e l e n g th [m]

l

4.45

4.45

A Pa n e l Are a [m2]

A

W =Ѱxxl or U=∑W W/∑ Ug W = U g xA A G l a ss U O v e ral l UH eat F lux V alue V alue [ W /K] [ W /m 2 K] [ W /m 2 K]

Ug

9.36

0.94

8.75

0.56

0.11

0.242

0.693

0.23

4.45

1.01

MP_Section 2B Vision_Head

MP_Section 2B Vision_Head.THM

9.36

0.94

8.75

0.56

0.11

0.242

0.693

0.23

4.45

1.01

MP_Section 3 Opaque_Sill

MP_Section 3 Opaque_Sill.THM

4.27

0.87

3.71

0.11

0.11

0.250

0.620

0.09

12.34

1.11

MP_Section 3 Opaque_Sill

MP_Section 3 Opaque_Sill.THM

4.27

0.87

3.71

0.11

0.11

0.250

0.620

0.09

12.34

1.11

1.84

0.11

0.11

0.220

0.330

0.03

12.34

MP_Section 4 Opaque_Head.THM

3.34

0.55

1.84

0.11

0.11

0.220

0.330

0.03

12.34

0.39

MP_Section 5B Vertical_Vision Edge

MP_Section 5 Vertical_Vision Edge.THM

11.72

0.55

6.45

0.56

0.11

0.220

0.330

0.16

13.50

2.20

MP_Section 5 Vertical_Vision Edge.THM

11.72

1 MP_Section 6 Vertical_Opaque COP

MP_Section 6 Vertical_Opaque COP.THM

3.06

0.60

1.83

0.11

0.11

0.300

0.300

0.03

0.00

0.00

1 MP_Section 6 Vertical_Opaque COP

MP_Section 6 Vertical_Opaque COP.THM

3.06

0.60

1.83

0.11

0.11

0.300

0.300

0.03

0.00

0.00

n/a

8.54

0.87

7.43

0.11

0.11

0.250

0.620

0.28

13.25

3.65

MP_Section 5B Vertical_Vision Edge

2

EDGE

2

EDGE

n/a

INF_Section 1B_Operable Head

INF_Section 1B_Operable Head.THM

8.54

14.83

INF_Section 1B_Operable Head

INF_Section 1B_Operable Head.THM

14.83

0.55

0.87

6.45

7.43

0.56

0.11

0.11

0.11

0.220

0.250

0.330

0.620

0.16

0.28

13.50

13.25

0.56

0.11

0.242

0.693

0.23

4.45

1.01

0.11

0.56

0.120

0.280

0.29

1.10

0.31

9.36

0.94

8.75

0.56

0.11

0.242

0.693

0.23

4.45

1.01

0.75

13.53

0.11

0.56

0.369

0.381

0.42

4.65

1.97

4.27

0.87

3.71

0.11

0.11

0.250

0.620

0.09

12.34

1.11

INF_Section 3B_Window Sill

INF_Section 3B_Window Sill.THM

18.03

0.75

13.53

0.11

0.56

0.369

0.381

0.42

4.65

1.97

MP_Section 3 MP_Section 3 INF_Section 7_Opaque INF_Section Opaque_Sill Opaque_Sill.THM Head 7_Opaque Head.THM

4.27 2.60

0.87 0.47

3.71 1.21

0.11 0.11

0.11 0.00

0.250 0.466

0.620 0.000

0.09 0.01

12.34 5.17

1.11 0.05

MP_Section 4 Opaque_Head

MP_Section 4 Opaque_Head.THM

INF_Section 7_Opaque INF_Section Head 7_Opaque Head.THM INF_Section 8_Opaque INF_Section Sill 8_Opaque Sill.THM MP_Section 4 MP_Section 4 Opaque_Head Opaque_Head.THM

MP_Section 5B INF_Section 8_Opaque Vertical_Vision Edge Sill

MP_Section 5B Vertical_Vision Edge

0.39

MP_Section 4 Opaque_Head

8.75

9.12

18.03

INF_Section 9_Cladding Subframe 0.55

0.94

0.40

MP_Section 3 Opaque_Sill.THM

3

3.34

9.36

22.80

MP_Section 3 Opaque_Sill

0.62

MP_Section 2B Vision_Head.THM

MP_Section 4 Opaque_Head.THM

INF_Section 2B_Door INF_Section 2B_Door Sill Sill.THM MP_Section 2B MP_Section 2B Vision_Head Vision_Head.THM INF_Section INF_Section 3B_Window Sill 3B_Window Sill.THM

W =Ѱxxl or U=∑W W/∑ W= U g xA A 0.62

MP_Section 2B Vision_Head

MP_Section 4 Opaque_Head

INF_Section 2B_Door INF_Section 2B_Door Sill Sill.THM MP_Section 2B MP_Section 2B Vision_Head Vision_Head.THM

3 INF_Section 1 9_Cladding Subframe MP_Section 6 INF_SectionCOP Vertical_Opaque 10_Cladding Joint

MP_Section 5 INF_Section Vertical_Vision 8_Opaque Sill.THM Edge.THM INF_Section 9_Cladding Subframe.THM MP_Section 5 Vertical_Vision Edge.THM INF_Section 9_Cladding6 MP_Section Subframe.THM Vertical_Opaque Placeholder Value COP.THM

MP_Section 6 INF_SectionCOP Vertical_Opaque 10_Cladding Joint INF_Section 13B_Operable to Operable 2 EDGE

MP_Section 6 Vertical_Opaque Placeholder Value COP.THM INF_Section 13B_Operable to Operable.THM n/a

INF_Section 13B_Operable to INF_Section Operable 2 14B_Operable EDGE Vision

INF_Section 13B_Operable INF_Section to Operable.THM 14B_Operable n/a Vision.THM

1

3.34

0.55

1.84

0.11

0.11

0.220

0.330

0.03

12.34

0.39

2.60

0.47

1.21

0.11

0.00

0.466

0.000

0.01

5.17

0.05

7.86 3.34

0.47 0.55

3.66 1.84

0.11 0.11

0.56 0.11

0.466 0.220

0.000 0.330

0.13 0.03

5.17 12.34

0.68 0.39

11.72 7.86

0.55 0.47

6.45 3.66

0.56 0.11

0.11 0.56

0.220 0.466

0.330 0.000

0.16 0.13

13.50 5.17

2.20 0.68

2.61

0.70

1.82

0.11

0.11

0.350

0.350

0.02

0.00

0.00

11.72

0.55

6.45

0.56

0.11

0.220

0.330

0.16

13.50

2.20

2.61

0.70

1.82

0.11

0.11

0.350

0.350

0.02

0.00

0.00

3.06 5.00

0.60 0.60

1.83 3.00

0.11 0.11

0.11 0.11

0.300 0.300

0.300 0.300

0.03 0.08

0.00 1.35

0.00 0.11

3.06 5.00

0.60 0.60

1.83 3.00

0.11 0.11

0.11 0.11

0.300 0.300

0.300 0.300

0.03 0.08

0.00 1.35

0.00 0.11

23.61

0.70

16.53

0.56

0.56

0.350

0.350

0.43

5.75

2.50

8.54

0.87

7.43

0.11

0.11

0.250

0.620

0.28

13.25

3.65

23.61 15.86 8.54

0.70 0.70 0.87

16.53 11.10 7.43

0.56 0.56 0.11

0.56 0.11 0.11

0.350 0.430 0.250

0.350 0.270 0.620

0.43 0.28 0.28

5.75 10.60 13.25

2.50 3.02 3.65

2.20

INF_Section INF_Section Glass Electrochromic 1B_Operable 14.83 0.80 11.87 0.56 INF_Section 1B_Operable Head Triple IGU Glass INF_Section Head.THM 14B_Operable 15.86 0.70 11.10 0.56 MP - Panel 01 (vert) 14B_Operable Vision Vision.THM MP - Panel 02 (horiz) INF - Panel 01 INF_Section INF_Section Glass Electrochromic 1B_Operable 14.83 0.80 11.87 0.56 1B_Operable Head Triple IGU Glass Head.THM 1 MP - Panel6 01 (vert) MP_Section detail U-Value assumed for MP - Panel 02 given frequency of framing 2B_Door INF_Section 2B_Door 2INF_Section MP - detail Panel to 02be(horiz) 22.80 MP_Section 0.40 EDGE developed; for the assembly calculations, 3 at 2x is assumed9.12 as a placeholder 0.11 Sill Sill.THM 3 INF -9Panel INF_Section detail01 U-Value assumed for INF - Panel 01 until final framing established

0.11

0.431

0.369

0.31

5.75

0.11

0.430

0.270

0.28

10.60

0.00 15.91 27.83 14.05 14.05

0.79 0.56 0.11 0.15 0.13

0.00 1.80 8.91 3.02 3.18 2.11 1.83

0.00 15.91 27.83 14.05 14.05

0.79 0.56 0.11 0.15 0.13

0.00 1.80 8.91 3.18 2.11 0.31 1.83

0.11

0.431

0.369

0.31

5.75

0.56

0.120

0.280

0.29

1.10

0.56

0.120

0.280

0.29

1.10

0.31

0.56

0.369

0.381

0.42

4.65

1.97

0.49

0.49

3.65 1

1075 N E LSON STR E ET DESIG N ASSIST U PDATE | R EV 00

1075 N E LSON STR E ET INF_Section 2B_Door INF_Section 2B_Door DESIG N ASSIST USillPDATE | Sill.THM R EV 00 22.80 INF_Section 2B_Door INF_Section 2B_Door Sill Sill.THM INF_Section 3B_Window Sill

INF_Section 3B_Window Sill

INF_Section 3B_Window Sill.THM

MP_Section 6 detail U-Value assumed for MP - Panel 02 given frequency of framing INF_Section 2B_Door 22.80 MP_Section 0.40 EDGE detail to be developed; for the assembly calculations, 3 at 2x is assumed9.12 as a placeholder 0.11 Sill Sill.THM 3 INF_Section 9 detail U-Value assumed for INF - Panel 01 until final framing established 2INF_Section 2B_Door

0.80

11.87

0.56

0.11

0.431

0.369

0.31

5.75

1.80

0.80

11.87

0.56

0.11

0.431

0.369

0.31

5.75

1.80

0.40

9.12

0.11

0.56

0.120

0.280

0.29

1.10

0.31

22.80

0.40

9.12

0.11

0.56

0.120

0.280

0.29

1.10

0.31

18.03

0.75

13.53

0.11

0.56

0.369

0.381

0.42

4.65

1.97

INF_Section 3B_Window Sill

INF_Section 3B_Window Sill.THM

18.03

0.75

13.53

INF_Section 3B_Window Sill

INF_Section 3B_Window Sill.THM

18.03

0.75

13.53

0.11

0.56

0.369

0.381

0.42

4.65

1.97

INF_Section 7_Opaque INF_Section Head 7_Opaque Head.THM

2.60

0.47

1.21

0.11

0.00

0.466

0.000

0.01

5.17

0.05

INF_Section 7_Opaque INF_Section Head 7_Opaque Head.THM INF_Section 8_Opaque INF_Section Sill 8_Opaque Sill.THM

INF_Section 3B_Window Sill.THM

18.03

0.75

13.53

0.11

0.56

0.369

0.381

0.42

4.65

1.97

INF_Section 7_Opaque INF_Section Head 7_Opaque Head.THM

2.60

0.47

1.21

0.11

0.00

0.466

0.000

0.01

5.17

0.05

3 INF_Section 9_Cladding Subframe

3 INF_Section 9_Cladding Subframe INF_Section 10_Cladding Joint

INF_Section 7_Opaque INF_Section Head 7_Opaque Head.THM INF_Section 8_Opaque INF_Section Sill 8_Opaque Sill.THM

INF_Section 8_Opaque Sill 3 INF_Section 9_Cladding Subframe

INF_Section 8_Opaque Sill.THM INF_Section 9_Cladding Subframe.THM

INF_Section 8_Opaque Sill

2.60

0.47

1.21

0.11

0.00

0.466

0.000

0.01

5.17

0.05

7.86

0.47

3.66

0.11

0.56

0.466

0.000

0.13

5.17

0.68

7.86

0.47

3.66

0.11

0.56

0.466

0.000

0.13

5.17

0.68

2.61

0.70

1.82

0.11

0.11

0.350

0.350

0.02

0.00

0.00

INF_Section 10_Cladding Joint INF_Section 13B_Operable to Operable

INF_Section 8_Opaque Sill.THM INF_Section 9_Cladding Subframe.THM

INF_Section 9_Cladding Subframe.THM Placeholder Value

0.11

2.60

0.47

1.21

0.11

0.00

7.86

0.47

3.66

0.11

0.56

7.86

0.47

3.66

0.11

0.56

2.61

0.70

1.82

0.11

0.11

2.61

0.70

1.82

0.11

5.00

0.60

3.00

0.11

Pre-Construction 0.000 0.01 Director0.000 Mr. John 0.13 Douglas Pre-Construction Director0.000 Mr. John 0.13 0.466 Douglas Technical Director 0.350 0.350 0.02 Mr. Julien Kempf 0.466

5.17

0.05

0.466

5.17

0.68

0.11

0.350

0.11

0.300

Technical Director 0.350 0.02

Project 0.68 Mr. Eam Construction 0.00 HS Manager Mr. Conor Houlihan Construction 0.00 0.00 HS Manager Mr. Conor 1.35 0.11 Houlihan Package Manager Package Manager–

5.17

0.00

Mr. Julien Kempf Design Team AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works 0.300

0.08

Front

Placeholder Value INF_Section 13B_Operable to Operable.THM

Project Mr. Eam

5.00

0.60

3.00

0.11

0.11

0.300

23.61

0.70

16.53

0.56

0.56

0.350

0.300 0.08 Design Team 0.350 Front 0.43

1.35

0.11

Package Manager2.50

5.75

Package Manager–

SELECTED WORKS | 1075 Nelson - CURV

Preliminary Thermal Analysis | Stepped IGU

Thermal Analysis Studies As the system design progressed, individual studies at each condition was done to determine the most optimal approach. Considerations for this included performance, architectural intent, cost, and any additional overhead associated with added trades and replacement strategies. The example to the right shows a study done evaluating different glass build-ups and impacts due to fabrication limitations.

Preliminary Thermal Analysis | Stepped IGU

Preliminary Thermal Analysis | Stepped IGU

Triple IGU without stepping glass Detail U-Value: 0.46 W/m2K Change: -

Halio IGU without stepping glass Detail U-Value: 0.50 W/m2K Change from Triple IGU: -7.9%

Halio IGU with 20mm stepping glass Detail U-Value: 0.52 W/m2K Change from Triple IGU: -12.4% Change from Halio IGU [no step]: -4.1%

Halio IGU with 32.5mm stepping glass Detail U-Value: 0.53 W/m2K Change from Triple IGU: -14.2% Change from Halio IGU [no step]: -5.8%

Triple IGU without stepping glass Detail U-Value: 0.60 W/m2K 1075Change: N E LSON- STR E ET

Halio IGU without stepping glass Detail U-Value: 0.68 W/m2K Change from Triple IGU: -12.2%

Halio IGU with 20mm stepping glass Detail U-Value: 0.72 W/m2K Change from Triple IGU: -18.7% Change from Halio IGU [no step]: -5.7%

Halio IGU with 32.5mm stepping glass Detail U-Value: 0.73 W/m2K Change from Triple IGU: -21.4% Change from Halio IGU [no step]: -8.1%

DESIG N ASSIST U PDATE | R EV 00

Triple IGU without stepping glass Detail U-Value: 0.60 W/m2K Change: -

Halio IGU without stepping glass Detail U-Value: 0.68 W/m2K Change from Triple IGU: -12.2%

Halio IGU with 20mm stepping glass Detail U-Value: 0.72 W/m2K Change from Triple IGU: -18.7% Change from Halio IGU [no step]: -5.7%

Halio IGU without stepping glass Assembly U-Value: 0.50 W/m2K Change from Triple IGU: -11%

Halio IGU with 20mm stepping glass Assembly U-Value: 0.51 W/m2K Change from Triple IGU: -13.3% Change from Halio IGU [no step]: -2.0%

Assumptions - Analysis assumes current 1100mm horizontal spandrel height. Results will be negatively impacted by an increased panel width to meet Halio’s fabrication limitation - Analysis assumes placeholder assumptions for MPA edge conditions - Analysis assumes 0.56 W/m2K glass performance for Triple IGU options - Analysis assumes 0.74 W/m2K glass performance for Halio options - loss due to glass inclination not included

Assembly Performances* TripleN EIGU without stepping glass 1075 LSON STR E ET 2 DESIG N ASSIST U PDATE EV 00 K Assembly U-Value: 0.45| RW/m Change: -

Halio IGU without stepping glass Assembly U-Value: 0.50 W/m2K Change from Triple IGU: -11%

Halio IGU with 20mm stepping glass Assembly U-Value: 0.51 W/m2K Change from Triple IGU: -13.3% Change from Halio IGU [no step]: -2.0%

Project Manager Mr. Eamun Guron

Halio IGU with 32.5mm stepping glass Detail U-Value: 0.73 W/m2K Technical Director Change from Triple IGU: -21.4% Mr. Julien Kempf Change from Halio IGU [no step]: -8.1% Design Team Front

Assembly Performances* Triple IGU without stepping glass Assembly U-Value: 0.45 W/m2K Change: -

Pre-Construction Director Mr. John Douglas

Package Manager

Halio IGU with 27.5mm stepping glass Assembly U-Value: 0.52 W/m2K BIM team - Front Change from Triple IGU: -15.6% Change from Halio IGU [no step]: -4% Production Order Teams

Construction Manager Mr. Conor Houlihan

HSE Manager

Package Manager–

Foremen

Foremen

Lift Supervisors

Lift Supervisors

Local Installation Teams

Local Installation Teams

AINSLEY | Selected Works Halio IGU with 27.5mmMCMASTER stepping glass Assembly U-Value: 0.52 W/m2K Material Movement Material Movement Change from Triple IGU: -15.6% Teams Teams Change from Halio IGU [no step]: -4%

Safety Offi

SELECTED WORKS | 1075 Nelson - CURV System Design Herein is a snapshot of drawings produced for the first Design Assist submission to the design team for comment and review.

WIND LOAD BRACKET INSET INTO SLAB; BRACKET PLACEMENT TBC;

DEAD LOAD BRACKET INSTALLED ON TOP OF SLAB; BRACKET PLACEMENT TBC;

3 -

4 -

°

500

° 90

525

90

° 90 °

2800

2800

1700

1067

1700

2 -

1 -

2 F1.11

450

525

100

°

°

96

PRE-INSTALLED STUDS INTO MEGAPANELS TO ACCOMMODATE SUPPORT OF INTERIOR FINISH TBC

450

550

450

BASE SUPPORTED MEGAPANEL

DEAD LOAD BRACKET

WIND LOAD BRACKET INSET INTO SLAB; BRACKET PLACEMENT TBC;

DEAD LOAD BRACKET

500

732

733

733

DEAD LOAD BRACKET 500

500

732

SECTION [MPA PANELS] SCALE: 1:20 500

DESIGN INTENT FOR INTEGRATION OF ISA FOR BMU CRADLE TO BE PROVIDED

550

550

BASE SUPPORTED MEGAPANEL

DESIGN INTENT FOR INTEGRATION OF ISA FOR BMU CRADLE TO BE PROVIDED

550

BASE SUPPORTED MEGAPANEL

450

450

368

368

450

4 -

°

°

SECTION [MPA PANELS] SCALE: 1:20

50

PRE-INSTALLED STUDS INTO MEGAPANELS TO ACCOMMODATE SUPPORT OF INTERIOR FINISH TBC

96

84

°

90

PRE-INSTALLED STUDS INTO MEGAPANELS TO ACCOMMODATE SUPPORT OF INTERIOR FINISH TBC

90

200

200

1100

1100

733

733

450

525

525

50

DESIGN INTENT FOR INTEGRATION OF ISA FOR BMU CRADLE TO BE PROVIDED

3 -

ENLARGED ELEVATION [MPA PANELS] SCALE: 1:20

PLAN DETAIL [MPA PANELS] SCALE: 1:5

100

525 50

1 -

2 -

PLAN DETAIL [MPA PANELS] SCALE: 1:5

1 F1.11 500

500

LEVEL 51 181.77 m

50

1100

100

90

1100

LEVEL 52 184.57 m

200

1100

200

1100

200

1100

200

1100

DEAD LOAD BRACKET INSTALLED ON TOP OF SLAB; BRACKET PLACEMENT TBC;

450 368

450 368

450

FINISH TO CONCEAL BRACKETING TBC

FINISH TO CONCEAL BRACKETING TBC

FLOORS WITH EXPOSED FINISH TBC

4.

FINISH TO CONCEAL BRACKETING TBC

FLOORS WITH EXPOSED FINISH TBC

FLOORS WITH EXPOSED FINISH TBC

5.

6.

7.

°

°

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

°

90

1.

°

90

90

°

°

90

°

90

8.

9.

90

90

NOTES-

Final facade cladding zone TBC pending additional bracketing design, structural analysis, and thermal analysis Final facade system depth to be coordinated with primary structure columns and slab edge Final facade cladding setting out and articulation at vertical spandrel TBD pending thermal analysis Final glass build-up and dimensions pending product selection, structural analysis, thermal analysis, and fabrication limitations Megapanel bracketing strategy is preliminary pending additional structural analysis Vertical joint requirements at the horizontal spandrel cladding pending finish selection All dimensions are in millimeters unless noted Otherwise.

All levels are in meters unless noted otherwise At East/West balcony locations, stepping of thermal break strategy TBC

525

1.

2.

°

°

90

8.

9.

WIND LOAD BRACKET AND SHEAR PINS AS REQ'D

3.

90

6.

7.

DEAD LOAD BRACKET

°

90

Final facade cladding zone TBC pending additional bracketing design, structural analysis, and thermal analysis Final facade system depth to be coordinated with primary structure columns and slab edge Final facade cladding setting out and articulation at vertical spandrel TBD pending thermal analysis Final glass build-up and dimensions pending product selection, structural analysis, thermal analysis, and fabrication limitations Megapanel bracketing strategy is preliminary pending additional structural analysis Vertical joint requirements at the horizontal spandrel cladding pending finish selection All dimensions are in millimeters unless noted Otherwise.

All levels are in meters unless noted otherwise At East/West balcony locations, stepping of thermal break strategy TBC

WIND LOAD BRACKET

90

GLASS SELECTION PENDING COSTING, DESIGN, AND THERMAL PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK

Aluminium Technology Auxiliary Ind. W.L.L.

GLASS SELECTION PENDING COSTING, DESIGN, AND THERMAL PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK

GLASS SELECTION PENDING COSTING, DESIGN, AND THERMAL PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK

2129

Aluminium Technology Auxiliary Ind. W.L.L.

Aluminium Technology Auxiliary Ind. W.L.L.

°

90

50

100

1065

500

525

°

2180

WIND LOAD BRACKET AND SHEAR PINS AS REQ'D

°

1 F1.21

WIND LOAD BRACKET

1065

MEGAPANEL-TO-INFILL PANEL CONDITION IN PROGRESS; TO BE SUBMITTED LATER

WIND LOAD BRACKET AND SHEAR PINS AS REQ'D

90

5.

NOTES-

Final facade cladding zone TBC pending additional bracketing design, structural analysis, and thermal analysis Final facade system depth to be coordinated with primary structure columns and slab edge Final facade cladding setting out and articulation at vertical spandrel TBD pending thermal analysis Final glass build-up and dimensions pending product selection, structural analysis, thermal analysis, and fabrication limitations Megapanel bracketing strategy is preliminary pending additional structural analysis Vertical joint requirements at the horizontal spandrel cladding pending finish selection All dimensions are in millimeters unless noted Otherwise.

All levels are in meters unless noted otherwise At East/West balcony locations, stepping of thermal break strategy TBC

368

4.

450

2.

3.

368

1.

MEGAPANEL BRACKETING ZONE REQUIRES COORDINATION OF PRIMARY STRUCTURE

DEAD LOAD BRACKET

500

NOTESINFILL PANEL CONDITION REQUIRES COORDINATION OF PRIMARY STRUCTURE

R63661

2180

1065 2180

1065

MEGAPANEL-TO-INFILL PANEL CONDITION IN PROGRESS; TO BE SUBMITTED LATER

2 F1.21 PLAN - MPA PANELS [MPA PANELS] SCALE: 1:20

REVISION NUMBER

--

DRAWN BY

REVIEWED BY

-

-

APPROVED BY

DATE

SHEET NO.

-

17-FEB-23

F1.01

1 -

SECTION [MPA PANELS] SCALE: 1:5

2 -

3 -

SECTION [MPA PANELS] SCALE: 1:5

4 -

SECTION [MPA PANELS] SCALE: 1:5

SECTION [MPA PANELS] SCALE: 1:5

REVISION NUMBER

DRAWN BY

4 -

-

--

APPROVED BY

DATE

SHEET NO.

-

17-FEB-23

F1.11

3 -

4 -

PLAN DETAIL [MPA PANELS] SCALE: 1:5

PLAN DETAIL [MPA PANELS] SCALE: 1:5

REVISION NUMBER

DRAWN BY

REVIEWED BY

-

SCALE -

1:20

3 -

REVIEWED BY

-

SCALE

-

--

APPROVED BY

DATE

SHEET NO.

-

17-FEB-23

F1.21

SCALE -

1:5

-

1:5

5 -

450

450

450

LEVEL 52 184.57 m

400

400

400

2800

1955

1700

2800

2800

2 -

2150

GLASS SELECTION PENDING COSTING, DESIGN, AND THERMAL PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK

GLASS SELECTION PENDING COSTING, DESIGN, AND THERMAL PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK

195

450

LEVEL 51 181.77 m

400 400 400

1 F2.11

2 F2.11

78

3 F2.11

BASE SUPPORTED INFILL PANEL

BASE SUPPORTED INFILL PANEL BASE SUPPORTED INFILL PANEL

3 -

SECTION [INF PANELS] SCALE: 1:20

4 -

SECTION [INF PANELS] SCALE: 1:20

5 -

SECTION [INF PANELS] SCALE: 1:20

2.

3.

1100

1200

904

1200

1100

150

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

NOTES-

Final facade cladding zone TBC pending additional bracketing design, structural analysis, and thermal analysis Final facade system depth to be coordinated with primary structure columns and slab edge Final facade cladding setting out and articulation at vertical spandrel TBD pending thermal analysis Final glass build-up and dimensions pending product selection, structural analysis, thermal analysis, and fabrication limitations Megapanel bracketing strategy is preliminary pending additional structural analysis Vertical joint requirements at the horizontal spandrel cladding pending finish selection All dimensions are in millimeters unless noted Otherwise.

All levels are in meters unless noted otherwise At East/West balcony locations, stepping of thermal break strategy TBC

MOVEMENT JOINT AT HEAD OF INFILL PANEL

MOVEMENT JOINT AT HEAD OF INFILL PANEL

MOVEMENT JOINT AT HEAD OF INFILL PANEL

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

NOTES-

Final facade cladding zone TBC pending additional bracketing design, structural analysis, and thermal analysis Final facade system depth to be coordinated with primary structure columns and slab edge Final facade cladding setting out and articulation at vertical spandrel TBD pending thermal analysis Final glass build-up and dimensions pending product selection, structural analysis, thermal analysis, and fabrication limitations Megapanel bracketing strategy is preliminary pending additional structural analysis Vertical joint requirements at the horizontal spandrel cladding pending finish selection All dimensions are in millimeters unless noted Otherwise.

All levels are in meters unless noted otherwise At East/West balcony locations, stepping of thermal break strategy TBC

Aluminium Technology Auxiliary Ind. W.L.L.

MEGAPANEL-TO-INFILL PANEL CONDITION IN PROGRESS; TO BE SUBMITTED LATER

2 -

5804

1.

78

NOTES1.

150

78

3 F2.21

450

2 F2.21

450

1 F2.21

400

400

135

ENLARGED ELEVATION [INF PANELS] SCALE: 1:20

195

1 -

450

2 -

2.

3.

GLASS SELECTION PENDING COSTING, DESIGN, AND THERMAL PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK

4.

5.

400

6.

7.

8.

9.

Final facade cladding zone TBC pending additional bracketing design, structural analysis, and thermal analysis Final facade system depth to be coordinated with primary structure columns and slab edge Final facade cladding setting out and articulation at vertical spandrel TBD pending thermal analysis Final glass build-up and dimensions pending product selection, structural analysis, thermal analysis, and fabrication limitations Megapanel bracketing strategy is preliminary pending additional structural analysis Vertical joint requirements at the horizontal spandrel cladding pending finish selection All dimensions are in millimeters unless noted Otherwise.

All levels are in meters unless noted otherwise At East/West balcony locations, stepping of thermal break strategy TBC

Aluminium Technology Auxiliary Ind. W.L.L.

Aluminium Technology Auxiliary Ind. W.L.L.

MEGAPANEL-TO-INFILL PANEL CONDITION IN PROGRESS; TO BE SUBMITTED LATER

PLAN [INF PANELS] SCALE: 1:20

REVISION NUMBER

DRAWN BY

REVIEWED BY

-

-

SCALE

1:20

--

APPROVED BY

DATE

SHEET NO.

-

17-FEB-23

F2.01

1 -

SECTION [INF PANELS] SCALE: 1:5

2 -

SECTION [INF PANELS] SCALE: 1:5

3 -

SECTION [INF PANELS] SCALE: 1:5

REVISION NUMBER

DRAWN BY

REVIEWED BY

-

-

SCALE -

1:5

--

APPROVED BY

DATE

SHEET NO.

-

17-FEB-23

F2.11

1 -

SECTION [INF PANELS] SCALE: 1:5

2 -

SECTION [INF PANELS] SCALE: 1:5

3 -

SECTION [INF PANELS] SCALE: 1:5

REVISION NUMBER

DRAWN BY

REVIEWED BY

-

-

--

APPROVED BY

DATE

SHEET NO.

-

17-FEB-23

F2.21

SCALE -

1:5

-

AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works

SELECTED WORKS | Jumeirah Bay Residences

ARRIVAL DROP-OFF

Jumeirah Bay Residences Location: Dubai, UAE Architect: ACPV Architects Role: Associate + Senior Associate Scope: Concept Design - Schematic Design Responsibilities included: - Project management (internal and external) - Coordination with Architects, Client, Executive Architects and related consultants - System detailing and development in 2D (AutoCAD) and 3D (Rhino3D) - Preliminary thermal analysis to NFRC standards - Preliminary acoustic performance analysis - Building access and maintenance strategy - Material and system research - Outline facade specification - Preliminary pricing feedback from cost consultant AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works

125 1 -

PLAN - SINGLE HEIGHT, SLIDER DOOR [TYPE 2] SCALE: 1:5

SELECTED WORKS | Jumeirah Bay Residences NO

Bedroom Unit Glass Facades 5 Typical 56

35 35

50 170

170

50

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION EWS1.1 TITLE PLAN DETAILS EWS1.1 SCALE DATE PLAN DETAILS 26 JANUARY 2022 Exterior PROJECT NO

56 56

35 50

Exterior Exterior Exterior

Facade Types Operable, Type 1 Operable, Type 2 Operable, Type 3A Operable, Type 3B 50 Type 1 Awning, Fixed, Flat Fixed, Curved

50 50

PLAN - SINGLE HEIGHT, SLIDER DOOR [TYPE 1] SCALE: 1:5

EWS-02 EWS-02 EWS-02 EWS-02 EWS-03 EWS-01 EWS-01

Count Total Area Comments 7 91 m2 Area includes adjacent fixed IGUs D 2 52 m2 Area includes adjacent fixed IGUsNO ISSUED STAGE 2 80 m2 Area includes adjacent fixed IGUs SCHEMATIC DESIGN 1 36 m2 Area includes adjacent fixed IGUs 100 E. BROADWAY UNIT 501, NEW YORK 11201 3 35 19 m2 TEL 212 242 2220 FAX 212 242 2253 WWW.FRONTINC.COM 21 128 m2 PROJECT 10 66 m2

472 m2 Total includes insulated mtl panel JUMEIRAH BAY RESID

Facade Types

System

Operable, Type 2 50 Operable, 3A 170 170Type 170 Operable Type 4 Operable Type 5 Facade Types Fixed, Flat Operable, Type 1 Fixed, Curved Operable, Type 2

EWS-02 EWS-02 EWS-02 EWS-02 System EWS-01 EWS-02 EWS-01 EWS-02

316

296

296

NOT FOR CONSTRUCT

TITLE

EWS1.1 Count Total Area Comments PLAN DETAILS 52Exterior m2 1 26 m2 Area includes adjacent fixed IGUsDATE 26 JANUARY 2022 Exterior 1 40 m2 Area includes adjacent fixed IGUsPROJECT NO 170 1 13 m2 Area includes adjacent fixed IGUs DRAWING NUMBER m2 Area includes adjacent fixed IGUsF 1.31 Count1 Total33 Area Comments 11 68 m2 m2 Area includes adjacent fixed IGUs 7 91 1 7 m2 2 52 m2 Area includes adjacent fixed IGUs

207

35 35

296

50 50

100 E. BROADWAY 100 E.100 BROADWAY UNIT E. BROADWAY 501,UNIT NEW501, UNIT YORK NEW 501, 11201 YORK NEW YORK 1120111201 TEL 212 242 TEL 2220 212 TEL242 212 FAX 2220 242 212 2220 242 FAX 2253 212 FAX242 2122253 242 2253 WWW.FRONTINC.COM WWW.FRONTINC.COM WWW.FRONTINC.COM

238 insulatedfixed mtl panel 80 m2 Total Area includes adjacent IGUs 36 m2 Area includes adjacent fixed IGUs 19 m2 128 m2 66 m2 472 m2 Total includes insulated mtl panel

296

35

207

207

50

296

207 296

35 35

System

2 Operable, Type 3A EWS-02 1 Operable, Type 3B EWS-02 3 Awning, TypeNO 1 NOISSUED EWS-03 NO ISSUED ISSUED DATE DATE DATE 21 Fixed, Flat STAGE STAGESTAGE EWS-01 SCHEMATIC SCHEMATIC SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN EWS-01 10 Fixed, Curved

35

35

REVISION

50

35

INDEX

R

2 -

296

266

266 50 50

125

Typical Details 02-EWS 1 1PLAN PLAN - SINGLE PLAN - SINGLE -HEIGHT, SINGLE HEIGHT, SLIDER HEIGHT, SLIDER DOOR SLIDER DOOR [TYPE DOOR [TYPE 2] [TYPE 2] 2] - - SCALE: SCALE: 1:5 SCALE: 1:5 1:5

SCALE

Bedroom UnitType Glass Operable, 1 Facades EWS-024 Typical4

Exterior

50

1 -

REVISION

170

F 1.33

207 296 266

296

207

207 296

207

296

207

296

Exterior Exterior Exterior

266

56

35 35

PROJECT NO

DRAWING NUMBER

PLAN - SINGLE HEIGHT, FIXED GLASS AT DRAINAGE PIPE SCALE: 1:5

230

35

2 -

PLAN - SINGLE HEIGHT, FIXED GLASS SCALE: 1:5

230

Typical Details 01-EWS 1 -

INDEX

F 1.31

PLAN - SINGLE HEIGHT, SLIDER DOOR [TYPE 2] SCALE: 1:5

230

PLAN - SINGLE HEIGHT, SLIDER DOOR [TYPE11] SCALE: 1:5

DATE

26 JANUARY 2022 DRAWING NUMBER

2 -

100 E. BROADWAY UNIT 501, NEW YORK 11201 TEL 212 242 2220 FAX 212 242 2253 WWW.FRONTINC.COM

TITLE

Exterior

125

100 E. BROADWAY UNITSCHEMATIC 501, NEW YORK 11201 DESIGN TEL 212 242 2220 FAX 212 242 2253 WWW.FRONTINC.COM

JUMEIRAH BAY RESIDENCE PROJECT NOT FOR JUMEIRAH CONSTRUCTION BAY RESIDENCE

266

316

Exterior

50 R

125

296

266

296

Exterior

Exterior

Exterior

DATE

STAGE

PROJECT

207

207 296

296

296

207

207

230

To ensure every facade system was captured, individual designations were established early in the project. This guided the coordination to ensure design intent was developed to the design team›s preferences. It also aided in early costing and area take-offs and allowed for quick updates as the design progressed.

NO ISSUED SCHEMATIC DESIGN

50

35

50

DATE

296

System Design

ISSUED

STAGE

316

316

316

266

266

266

207 296

207

207 296

296

207 296

296

207 296

207

PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT

125

125 Exterior Exterior Exterior

Exterior Exterior Exterior

50 50

50

50

50

170 170 170

R

50

R

Typical Details 03-EWS

R

125 125 125

JUMEIRAH JUMEIRAH JUMEIRAH BAY BAY RESIDENCE BAY RESIDENCE RESIDENCE Facade Types System Count Total Area Comments NOT1NOT FOR NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION4 52 m2 Operable, Type EWS-02 TITLE 2 TITLE TITLE 1 26 m2 Area includes adjacent fixed IGUs Operable, Type EWS-02 EWS1.1 EWS1.1 EWS1.1 1 40 m2 Area includes adjacent fixed IGUs Operable, Type 3A EWS-02 PLAN DETAILS PLAN DETAILS DETAILS 1 13 m2 Area includes adjacent fixed IGUs Operable Type 4PLAN EWS-02 33 m2 Area includes adjacent fixed IGUs Operable Type DATE 5 DATE DATE EWS-02 SCALE SCALESCALE 1 JANUARY 26 26 JANUARY JANUARY 20222022 2022 Exterior Exterior Exterior 11 68 m2 Fixed, Flat 26 EWS-01 INDEX INDEX INDEX PROJECT PROJECT NO PROJECT NO NO EWS-01 1 7 m2 Fixed, Curved DRAWINGDRAWING NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER NUMBER

2 -

REVISIONREVISION REVISION

F 1.31F 1.31 F 1.31

2 2PLAN PLAN - SINGLE PLAN - SINGLE -HEIGHT, SINGLE HEIGHT, SLIDER HEIGHT, SLIDER DOOR SLIDER DOOR [TYPE DOOR [TYPE 1] [TYPE 1] 1] - - SCALE: SCALE: 1:5 SCALE: 1:5 1:5

NO

ISSUED

DATE

NO

ISSUED

STAGE

STAGE

SCHEMATIC DESIGN

SCHEMATIC DESIGN

DATE

238 m2 Total includes insulated mtl panel

AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works

SC

IN

R

SELECTED WORKS | Jumeirah Bay Residences Single Height, Operable Exterior

Exterior

Architecturally, the facade system was intended to read as uniform. This required a thoughtful design that accommodated double-height spaces and133 operable sliding doors. Conversations with suppliers were key to unlocking a solution that met the design intent along with the budget. To the right is a comparison of the design intent at the single and double-height conditions which incorporate large sliding door units.

195

150

150

310

80 80

310

209

80

150

Double Height, Operable

216

420

500

NO

ISSUED

DATE

STAGE

SCHEMATIC DESIGN

310

350

350

420

500

216

310

System Design

100 E. BROADWAY UNIT 501, NEW YORK 11201 TEL 212 242 2220 FAX 212 242 2253 WWW.FRONTINC.COM

216

216

JUMEIRAH BAY RESIDENCE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

750

310

Horizontal beam is suspended from slab by adjustable rods

310

310

310

PROJECT

750

TITLE

Exterior

EWS1.1 SECTION DETAILS

170

Exterior

Exterior

Exterior

750

SCALE

PROJECT NO

INDEX

26 JANUARY 2022

SECTION - DOUBLE HEIGHT, FIXED

170

170

195 170

209

150

80

80 80

170

150

Exterior

195

NO

280

50

1

500

420

150

150

80

280

150 50

Exterior

750

420

133

500

750

Exterior

Exterior

REVISION

F 1.21

SECTION - SINGLE HEIGHT, SLIDER DOOR [TYPE 3A] SCALE: 1:10

80

3 -

750

Exterior DRAWING NUMBER

SECTION - SINGLE HEIGHT, SLIDER DOOR [TYPE 1+2] SCALE: 1:10

Tieback at column

DATE

Exterior

2 -

216

170

216

2

ISSUED

DATE

195AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works

STAGE SECTION - DOUBLE HEIGHT, SLIDER DOOR [TYPE 3B]

SELECTED WORKS | Jumeirah Bay Residences

Stacking Sections Massing Scale

3D Axo Exploded

MASSINGScale 1 : 50

Scale As indicated

A

MEP

Facade Access + Maintenance

CITY VIEW

L25:L27 BVLGARI SKY VILLA

Because the program was high-end residential with limited interior access, glass cleaning and replacement strategies required exterior access with minimal architectural B imposition. The vertical ‹V› facade at either short end of the building provided a clear, continuous path up the building to service the facade. This with the use of a bespoke gondola became the baseline strategy going into later design stages as illustrated in the diagrams to the right

14.22 m

4

3.96 m 4.86 m 5.40 m

4.30 m

3.60 m 14.22 m

3.96 m

108.28 m

Scale

Temporary davit mounted to fixed rail of access platform

4.86 m5.40 m

126.80 m

Massing

L09:L24 5 BEDROOM PENTHOUSES

21-298-X-CVP-XX-XX-PR-A-1004 ACPV ARCHITECTS

14.22 m

114.66 m

103.86 m 5.94 m 3.96 m

ACPV ARCHITECTS

L00 AMENITIES

ACPV ARCHITECTS

03/04/22

3.96 m

BHRDT

7.84 m 3.60 m

Ocean View Villas New Revetmnet

Tunnel

Yatch Club

PARKING

4

1 : 1000

3.96 m 4.86 m 5.40 m

Cross Section

New Revetmnet

1.09 m

5.94 m

5.40 m

1.09 m

Drop Off

A

44.92 m

13.24 m

5.34 m

3.96 m

5.40 m 5.94 m 3.96 m

31.68 m

7.84 m

5.34 m

7.84 m

5.40 m

13.24 m

L01 MEP

25.74 m

5.94 m

44.92 m

118.96 m

63.36 m 118.96 m

3.96 m

114.66 m

103.86 m

63.36 m

L01:L08 4 BEDROOM RESIDENCES

15

ACPV ARCHITECTSBHRDT

ACPV ARCHITECTS

03/04/22

BHRDT

2022 May 17 BHRDT

BVLGARI . LIGHTHOUSE

02/25/22

2022 Oct 28

AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works

SELECTED WORKS | Dior, Vendome

Dior, Vendome Location: Doha, Qatar Architect: Aranda/Lasch Role: Associate DIOR Femme Doha © Aranda\Lasch Scope: Schematic Design - Construction Administration Responsibilities included: - System detailing and development in 2D (AutoCAD) and 3D (Rhino3D) - Material and system research - Bidding and negotiation reviews - Shop drawing review

DIOR Femme Doha © Gerry O’Leary

DIOR Femme Doha © Aranda\Lasch

DIOR FEMME DOHA

ARANDA\LASCH

AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works

SELECTED WORKS | Dior, Vendome

FINS ARE 50MM SHORT OF THE FULL PREFABRICATED PANEL HEIGHT TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO HORIZONTAL JOINT AFTER PANELS ARE INSTALLED; JOINTS TO BE WELDED AND POLISHED TO FINS ARE 50MM SHORT OF A HAIRLINE APPEARANCE THE FULL PREFABRICATED

Mock-Up | Drawing Set

System Design in 3D The 3-dimensional nature of the design intent required extensive study in modeling software to communicate joint strategy, how reinforcement was incorporated, and the bracketing approach for each prefabricated unit. Due to the back-lighting of the facade, it was a priority to have these connections well-documented for coordination.

GAPS BETWEEN FINS TO BE CLOSED ON-SITE WITH INFILL PANELS TO CREATE CONTINUOUS APPEARANCE

PANEL HEIGHT TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO HORIZONTAL JOINT AFTER PANELS ARE FRONT INSTALLED; JOINTS TO BE WELDED AND POLISHED TO A HAIRLINE APPEARANCE

AL-1 FIXTURE INTEGRATED INTO 500MM FINS TYPICAL FIN PRE-INSTALLED TO KRION PANEL BRACKET-INTEGRATED FIN [FIN SIZE AND TYPE VARIES]

GAPS BETWEEN FINS TO BE CLOSED ON-SITE WITH INFILL PANELS TO CREATE CONTINUOUS APPEARANCE

FRONT

FRONT

FRONT

AL-1 FIXTURE INTEGRATED INTO 500MM FINS TYPICAL FIN PRE-INSTALLED TO KRION PANEL BRACKET-INTEGRATED FIN [FIN SIZE AND TYPE VARIES]

FIN AT VERTICAL JOINT WELDED INTO PLACE [SEE MU2-D-02]

BRACKET

FIN AT VERTICAL JOINT WELDED INTO PLACE [SEE MU2-D-02] BRACKET 2 -

ISS

KRION PANEL CONTINUOUS ALUMINUM PLATE BEHIND FIN FASTENER HORIZONTAL JOINT SITE-WELDED AFTER PANELS ARE INSTALLED INSTALLED PANEL BELOW

KRION PANEL CONTINUOUS ALUMINUM PLATE BEHIND FIN FASTENER

15/B TEL

PRO

HORIZONTAL JOINT SITE-WELDED AFTER PANELS ARE INSTALLED

D

PHA

INSTALLED PANEL BELOW

DE

TITL

M

J

DAT

08

PRO

19

SHE

1 -

PERSPECTIVE | OVERALL ASSEMBLY [JOINT TYPE 1] SCALE: NTS

AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works

M

SELECTED WORKS | Dior, Vendome System Design Herein is a snapshot of drawings produced for the design intent of the first visual mockup used to tender the project.

Mock-Up | Drawing Set

Mock-Up | Drawing Set

HORIZONTAL JOINT TYPE 2: TAPERED OPEN JOINT 6

VERTICAL JOINT TYPE 2 HORIZONTAL JOINT TYPE 2

15 15 15

MOVEMENT JOINT

Mock-Up | Drawing Set

6

FIXTURE TYPE AB-1 INTEGRATED METAL PANEL WITH CUTOUT OPENINGS FOR BRACKET ACCESS HORIZONTAL STEEL, BELOW 3-WAY ADJUSTABLE BRACKET

2

HORIZONTAL FIN JOINT TYPE 2: STEPPED MOVEMENT JOINT

3

ELEVATION | JOINT TYPE 2

1

SCALE: 1:4

-

SCALE: 1:4

FASTENER, 300MM O.C.

VERTICAL JOINT TYPE 1 EDGE FIN PRE-WELDED TO BACK-UP PANEL

CONTINUOUS ALUM. PLATE

ELEVATION | JOINT TYPE 2 LOCATION

4 -

15 15

60GS-1

1 -

SCALE: 1:100

PLAN | SHOW WINDOW

60GS-2

60GS-3

F-2

G.6-1

9 MIN

SCALE: 1:100

8 MIN

G.6-3

9 MIN

VERTICAL JOINT TYPE 2: MILLED, LAPPED JOINT

15

G.6-2

G.9-1

G.9-3A

G.9-3B

9 MIN

Ø6 ISSUE TITLE

G.9-2

50

SECTION | HORIZONTAL JOINT TYPE 2

52

-

100 [TBC]

3

Ø9 ISSUE TITLE

G.6-1

PROJECT NAME

DIOR VENDOME

DIOR VENDOME

PANELS ARE PREFABRICATED TO ALLOW A SINGLE-PASS INSTALL. THE HORIZONTAL JOINT IS TAPERED TO MINIMISE THE MOVEMENT JOINT APPEARANCE.

60GS-2

60GS-2

60GS-2

60GS-2

G.6-2

G.6-2

G.9-2

G.9-2

TITLE

MOCK-UP

MOCK-UP

JOINT TYPE 2

PLAN DETAILS

G.9-3B 1 PREFABRICATED PANEL [WIDTH VARIES; SEE MU2-E-02]

G.9-3A

G.6-3

DATE

NOTED

08 OCTOBER 2019

NOTED

PROJECT NUMBER

INDEX

SHEET NUMBER

1 -

PLAN | FIN WITH EMBEDDED BRACKET

2

SCALE: 1:4

-

PLAN | TYPICAL FIELD FIN

-

FIN TYPOLOGIES DATE

INTERNAL PRESENTATION

SCALE

08 OCTOBER 2019

NOTED

PROJECT NUMBER

INDEX

19029.00

9MM GROOVE

REVISION

MU2-P-04

SCALE: 1:4

Mock-Up | Drawing Set DIOR VENDOME

59

FIXTURE TYPE AG-1 MOUNTED AS CONTINUOUS RUN

2

CONTINUOUS ALUMINUM PLATE BEHIND FIN PROFILE

6MM GROOVE

30

PLAN | FIN TYPOLOGIES

INTERNAL PRESENTATION

FIXTURE TYPE AG-1 MOUNTED AS CONTINUOUS RUN

FACTORY FINISH

30

SHEET NUMBER

1

Mock-Up | Drawing Set DIOR VENDOME PAINTED MDF TO MATCH SITE-STONE

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

REVISION

INTERNAL PRESENTATION

209

30

60 GRIT SANDPAPER

Mock-Up | Drawing Set DIOR VENDOME PAINTED MDF TO MATCH SITE-STONE

PHASE

30

30

MU2-P-01

SCALE: 1:4

30

NO LIGHT FIXTURE

19029.00 REVISION

30

SCALE

INDEX

MU2-J-03

SCALE: 1:4

PROJECT NAME

MOCK-UP

PROJECT NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER

PLAN | VERTICAL JOINT TYPE 2

-

30

TITLE

08 OCTOBER 2019 19029.00

2

30

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

TITLE

SCALE

30

DIOR VENDOME

PHASE

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

DATE

15/B E-TRADE PLAZA, 24 LEE CHUNG STREET, CHAI WAN, HONG KONG TEL +852 5804 9256 FAX +852 5804 9257

30

PROJECT NAME

PHASE

THE VERTICAL JOINT RUNS PARALLEL TO AN ADJACENT FIN TO LIMIT JOINTS AT THE FINS. THE BACK-UP PANEL'S JOINT OVERLAPS TO MINIMISE THE MOVEMENT JOINT APPEARANCE

15/B E-TRADE PLAZA, 24 LEE CHUNG STREET, CHAI WAN, HONG KONG TEL +852 5804 9256 FAX +852 5804 9257

G.6-1

500

15/B E-TRADE PLAZA, 24 LEE CHUNG STREET, CHAI WAN, HONG KONG TEL +852 5804 9256 FAX +852 5804 9257

10

7

350

250

ISSUE TITLE

MU2-P-06

EMBEDDED PLATE GENERAL: ALL FINISHES IN CAVITY TO HAVE MATTE WHITE FINISH

GENERAL: ALL FINISHES IN CAVITY TO HAVE MATTE WHITE FINISH

100

VERTICAL JOINT BRACKET BACK-UP FRAME

FIXTURE TYPE AB-1

100

DIFFUSER GLASS BALUSTRADE SIGNAGE PANEL

6293

100

BACK-UP METAL PANEL VOID FOR BRACKET BACK-UP FRAME

6293

OPENING IN AB-1 BRACKET

P-1

P-2

5693 5639

1220

200

CONTINUOUS ALUMINUM PLATE BEHIND FIN PROFILE

3299

1160

P-3

1826

ISSUE TITLE

ISSUE TITLE

ISSUE TITLE

100

HORIZONTAL JOINT TYPE 1

1870

SHIM AS NEEDED

1084

HORIZONTAL JOINT TYPE 1

1870

FIXTURE TYPE AB-1

P-5

P-6

P-7 500

P-4 15/B E-TRADE PLAZA, 24 LEE CHUNG STREET, CHAI WAN, HONG KONG TEL +852 5804 9256 FAX +852 5804 9257

4900

PHASE

100 120

2 SIM

10

MU2-P-06

SECTION | AT TYPICAL 350MM FIN BUILD-UP SCALE: 1:10

2 -

SECTION | AT TYPICAL 500MM FIN BUILD-UP SCALE: 1:10

PHASE

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

6770

6720

TITLE

TITLE

MOCK-UP

MOCK-UP

MOCK-UP

SECTION DETAILS

ELEVATIONS

ELEVATIONS

DATE

SCALE

DATE

SCALE

DATE

08 OCTOBER 2019

NOTED

08 OCTOBER 2019

NOTED

08 OCTOBER 2019

NOTED

PROJECT NUMBER

INDEX

PROJECT NUMBER

INDEX

PROJECT NUMBER

INDEX

19029.00 SHEET NUMBER

-

PHASE

TITLE

1800

100

500

1

7000

500

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

350

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

DIOR VENDOME

2820

1000 960

50 50

PROJECT NAME

2850

2399

350

DIOR VENDOME

2850

1000

200

DIOR VENDOME

500

50

BLACK PAINTED METAL SIGNAGE

7000

BLACK PAINTED METAL SIGNAGE

15/B E-TRADE PLAZA, 24 LEE CHUNG STREET, CHAI WAN, HONG KONG TEL +852 5804 9256 FAX +852 5804 9257

PROJECT NAME

2520

900

15/B E-TRADE PLAZA, 24 LEE CHUNG STREET, CHAI WAN, HONG KONG TEL +852 5804 9256 FAX +852 5804 9257

PROJECT NAME

1000

FASTENER, 300MM O.C.

100 200

REVISION

MU2-S-01

1 -

ELEVATION | PREFABRICATED FIN PANELISATION SCALE: 1:50

2 -

1411

ELEVATION | INBOARD LAYOUT SCALE: 1:50

2870 3070

100

FASTENER, 300MM O.C.

19029.00 1411

200

SHEET NUMBER

REVISION

MU2-E-02

1 -

ELEVATION | AB-1-INTEGRATED BACK-UP WALL PANELISATION SCALE: 1:50

DIOR VENDOME

DIOR VENDOME

DIOR VENDOME

INTERNAL PRESENTATION

INTERNAL PRESENTATION

INTERNAL PRESENTATION

2 -

1260

1260

1311

1311

ELEVATION | AB-1 LIGHTING LAYOUT SCALE: 1:50

SCALE

19029.00 SHEET NUMBER

REVISION

MU2-E-03

AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works

SELECTED WORKS | Lusail Plaza Towers

Lusail Plaza Towers Location: Lusail, Qatar Architect: Foster + Partners Role: Facade Consultant + Associate Scope: Concept Design - Construction Administration Responsibilities included: - Project management (internal and external) during Construction Administration - Coordination with Architects, Client, Executive Architects and related consultants - System detailing and development in 2D (AutoCAD) and 3D (Rhino3D) - Thermal analysis to EN standards - Material and system research - Design reports - Shop drawing review - Factory and site visits

130

AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works

SELECTED WORKS | Lusail Plaza Towers Facade Articulation

Triangulated

Planar Quads

Cold Bent Quads

Triangulated

Planar Quads

Cold Bent Quads

Design Intent Production Time Thermal Performance Design Intent Material Efficiency Production TimeUHPC Cost Thermal Performance Material Efficiency Cost

Design Intent Production Time Thermal Performance Design Intent Material Efficiency AluminiumProduction - PVDF Time Cost Thermal Performance Material Efficiency Cost

During the pre-tender design stage, materiality, constructability, and cost were driving factors that led a series of studies. Included was the system design which would have a direct impact on the facade articulation. In all cases, system performance, architectural intent, and material use was considered. To the right is a snapshot of studies condensed into final summaries used to communicate with the design team.

GFRC

Weight Fabrication Costs Production Lead Time Durability in Environment Workability Replacement Overall Cost Regional Availability Recyclability Low Carbon Options Reflectivity Panel Size Finish

Weight Fabrication Costs Production Lead Time Durability in Environment Workability Replacement Overall Cost Regional Availability Recyclability Low Carbon Options Reflectivity Panel Size Finish

Weight Fabrication Costs Production Lead Time Durability in Environment Workability Replacement Overall Cost Regional Availability Recyclability Low Carbon Options Reflectivity Panel Size Finish

Design Intent Production Time Thermal Performance Design Intent Material Efficiency Aluminium - Untreated Marine Grade (5754) Duplex Stainless Steel Production Time Cost Thermal Performance Material Efficiency Cost

Weight Fabrication Costs Production Lead Time Durability in Environment Workability Replacement Overall Cost Regional Availability Recyclability Low Carbon Options Reflectivity Panel Size Finish

Weight Fabrication Costs Production Lead Time Durability in Environment Workability Replacement Overall Cost Regional Availability Recyclability Low Carbon Options Reflectivity Panel Size Finish

AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works

SELECTED WORKS | Lusail Plaza Towers

Tower | System Design Cold Bent Fabrication Sequence

System Design - Cold Bending To achieve the design intent, programme, and budget, cold-bending at scale was a challenge that needed to be overcome in coordination with the design team and facade contractor. To do this, studies like the one illustrated to the right were developed, mocked-up, and used as the basis for vetting the system design during the Design Build stage of the project.

Facade surface geometry

Step 1 | Aluminum frame is fabricated to its final geometry. In some cases this will be a flat panel while others will include curved transoms

Step 2 | A corner of the aluminum frame is pulled out of plane

Flat geometry

Step 3 | The resulting geometry matches the project bent condition and is clamped in place

Tower | System Design Cold Bent Installation Sequence

Flat geometry

Step 4 | The insulated glazing unit (IGU) is fabricated as a flat panel

Flat geometry

Step 5 | The IGU is lowered onto the bent aluminum frame and glazed and/or mechanically captured into place

24

Lusail Plaza Towers / Facade Report

Facade surface geometry

Step 7 | The glazed unit is hoisted into place

Facade surface geometry

Step 6 | Once cured, the aluminum frame is released from the clamps and allowed to return to it's original form.

9206-BP12C-HDEC-REP-AR-00014

Facade surface geometry

Step 8 | The glazed unit engages with the first bracket

Flat geometry

Step 9 | The glazed unit is bent into place at the second bracket and locked into place

AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works

BMU Capacity

The BMU must carry the weight of the cradle as well as the weight of the material hoist. In the case of Lusail Towers, the material hoist must be able to carry a replacement glass unit as well as the suction cup rig to which it is attached. This total mass is estimated at 1000 kg.

SELECTED WORKS | Lusail Plaza Towers Tower | Vertical Facade BMU in closed position

envelope of the building at the topmost floors. Access is provided through the common Vertical Transport the geometric centre of each constraints tower, from which Becausecore of inthe ofoperators the building mass along with the added can access the BMU room and machine directly.

complexity of the three-dimensional protrusions, a bespoke access and maintenance Concept strategyBMU was Door required.

During Schematic Design, this was developed loosely and | Vertical Facade Tower The dedicated BMU room is enclosed with a horizontal screen that is designed to matchduring the adjacent further invetigated post-tender theskylight Design Build period in coordination with the BMU Design | Access and Storage system. The screen is not weather tight but does avert Architects ofrain Record and trades. The final built solution incorporates two hidden some and shade therelated unit; it is permanently mounted to the top of the jib, such that it does not have to BMU units on the roof concealed by aluminum caps which mimic the roof facade. retract or otherwise integrate into the skylight system adjacent. In this way, when the unit is parked, it will simultaneously enclose itself.

11000

In the case that a glass unit needs to be replaced, this will occur from outside the building using the Glass Replacement Unit suspended The roof door is attached to from the BMU. The characteristics the BMU façade panels do not allow acthe BMU. Whenofthe cess for interior mounting. raises in to position, the Because the IGUs are held in place with structural door lifts with it silicone, the initial access trip will release the existing panel by detaching the mechanical closure piece, and cutting the silicone bite free. The panel is released, the glazing surfaces cleaned, and a new panel brought in, which is then glazed in place and held there using temporary clips. After the required curing duration (weeks), another access trip is performed in order to remove the temporary clips and reinstall the exterior mechanical closure component. This process is illustrated below, following the BMU Stability and Reaction calculations. Protrusion replacement follows a similar procedure without the requirement for re-glazing.

1 Level ROOF | SECTION AT BMU STORAGE [CLOSED] 1 : 100

VARIES

VARIES 14175

GENERAL NOTES 1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. DIMENSIONS GOVERN. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3. ALL LEVELS ARE IN METRES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED ON SITE BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 5. FOSTER + PARTNERS SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 6. ANY AREAS INDICATED ON THIS SHEET ARE APPROXIMATE AND INDICATIVE ONLY. 7. ALL LEVELS IN METERS AND RELATED TO QATAR NATIONAL HEIGHT DATUM (QNHD) 8. GENERAL STRUCTURAL GRID DIMENSIONS - 9000 X 9000MM

DURING BMU OPERATION, ROOF DOOR MOVES WITH MACHINE

8500 [MINIMUM REACH]

3260

11000

Facade Access + Maintenance The BMU sits in a dedicated room within the overall

10750

Facade Panel Replacement Strategy

Non insulated roof panels adjacent to BMU

Access to the Building Maintenance Unit

TRACKS ALONG GROUND ALLOW BMU TO MOVE AND REACH FACADE EXTENTS

FIXED LADDER WITH SAFETY CAGE

5120 2560

CLEARANCE REQUIRED TO OPERATE BMU

2500

BMU Design | Access, Sorage, Stability, and Reactions

BMU STORAGE ROOM

4500

2 Level ROOF | SECTION AT BMU STORAGE [OPEN] 1 : 100

BMU Stability and Reactions

A0 Sheet Size

The weight-balance and the reactions to primary structure are provided on the following pages.

ROOF PROTRUSIONS

19

Lusail Plaza Towers / Facade Report

WHEN BMU NOT IN OPERATION, ROOF DOOR IS CLOSED AND CREATES CONTINUATION OF ROOF FACADE

BMU Capacity

The BMU must carry the weight of the cradle as well as the weight of the material hoist. In the case of Lusail Towers, the material hoist must be able to carry a replacement glass unit as well as the suction cup rig to which it is attached. This total mass is estimated at 1000 kg.

BMU STORAGE ROOM

01 00

20/09/19 26/07/19

Rev.

Date

100% Schematic Design 100% Schematic Design

MA MA

Issue / Revision Description

Chk

Issued for Review

Key Plan 10750

11000

Reason for Issue

9205-BP12B-MMJV-R

Plot 1

Plot 3

Plot 2

Plot 4

TRACKS ALONG GROUND ALLOW BMU TO MOVE AND REACH FACADE EXTENTS Makkah

N

Facade Panel Replacement Strategy

Reference Files

In the case that a glass unit needs to be replaced, this will occur from outside the building using the Glass Replacement Unit suspended from the BMU. The characteristics of the façade panels do not allow access for interior mounting.

Because the IGUs are held in place with structural silicone, the initial access trip will release the existing panel by detaching the mechanical closure piece, and cutting the silicone bite free. The panel is released, the glazing surfaces cleaned, and a new panel brought in, which is then glazed in place and held there using temporary clips. After the required curing duration (weeks), another access trip is performed in order to remove the temporary clips and reinstall the exterior mechanical closure component. This process is illustrated below, following the BMU Stability and Reaction calculations. Protrusion replacement follows a similar procedure without the requirement for re-glazing.

LUS-BP12C-F&P-BIM-AR-3TXxxin-001.rvt LUS-BP12-F&P-BIM-AR-XTXxxgr-001.rvt LUS-BP12C-F&P-BIM-AR-3TXxxcl-001.rvt LUS-BP12C-F&P-BIM-AR-3TXxxst-001.rvt LUS-BP12C-F&P-BIM-AR-3PXbxxx-001.rvt LUS-BP12C-F&P-BIM-AR-3PXxxst-001.rvt

1 Level ROOF | SECTION AT BMU STORAGE [CLOSED]

DOTTED LINE REPRESENTS EXTENT OF SHADING ELEMENTS

1 : 100

VARIES

AREA ABOVE CORE AND BMU ENCLOSURES IS OPEN AIR

VARIES 14175

DURING BMU OPERATION, ROOF DOOR MOVES WITH MACHINE

8500 [MINIMUM REACH]

Client Lusail Real State Development Company P.O. BOX 26060 Doha State Of Qatar T +974 4497 4444 F +974 4497 7563

CLEAR WHEN BMU ROOF ACCESS DOOR IS OPEN

PMCM 3260

JOINT VENTURE Jaidah square, suite 602A, 63 Airport Road P.O. Box 202401 Doha, Qatar 11000 2560

POWER AND WATER SUPPLY TO EACH BMU ROOM

Designer

FIXED LADDER WITH SAFETY CAGE

5120

Riverside, 22 Hester Road London SW11 4AN T +44(0)20 7738 0455 F +44(0)20 7738 1107 www.fosterandpartners.com

CLEARANCE REQUIRED TO OPERATE BMU

© Foster + Partners 2018

EXECUTIVE OFFICE SPACE (INTERIOR)

2500

Project

LUSAIL PLAZA TOWERS - BP12A 4500

Package

4500

100% Schematic Design Submission Drawing Title

Project No

2 Level ROOF | SECTION AT BMU STORAGE [OPEN]

Sheet First Issue Date

2841 26/07/19

1 : 100

Scale at ISO A0

14175

DA Sections Tower 01 Cleaning Systems, BMU Storage Revision

1 : 100 01

BESPOKE GONDOLA STORED FOR GLASS REPLACEMENT

Drawing Number

LUS-BP12A-F&P-DWG-AR-1TX207XX-001

A0 Sheet Size

19

Lusail Plaza Towers / Facade Report

9205-BP12B-MMJV-REP-AR-00014

ROOF ACCESS DOOR ATTACHED AS HAT TO BMU

4500

1 Level 49 | ROOF PLAN 1 : 200

AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works 9205-BP12B-MMJV-REP-AR-00014

20

Lusail Plaza

SELECTED WORKS | Longwood Gardens

Longwood Gardens Location: Pennsylvania, USA Architect: Weiss/Manfredi Role: Facade Consultant, Associate + Senior Associate Scope: Schematic Design - Construction Administration Responsibilities included: - Project management (internal and external) - Coordination with Architects, Client, Executive Architects and related consultants - System detailing and development in 2D (AutoCAD) and 3D (Rhino3D) - Material and system research - Bidding and negotiation reviews - Shop drawing review - Factory visits and visual mock-up reviews

AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works

SELECTED WORKS | Longwood Gardens Fabrication QA/QC

LONGWOOD GARDENS Kennett Square, PA Observation Report #2, Roschmann Factory Visit Dates of Observation: June 7, 2022 Date of Issue: June 10, 2022 2 . 4 b O p e r a b l e w i n d o w f r a m e (h o l e s ) Additional holes not indicated in shop drawings were observed.

LONGWOOD GARDENS Kennett Square, PA Observation Report #2, Roschmann Factory Visit Dates of Observation: June 7, 2022 Date of Issue: June 10, 2022

Photo Appendix - See the photo appendix of other reviewed items on the subsequent pages.

Regular factory visits were made to the facade contractor›s facilities based out of Germany. During these visits, glass, steel, and aluminum systems were evaluated for compliance with the design intent, quality of work, and coordination of any outstanding design solutions. To the right are extracts of factory reports completed for record and circulation to the design team and facade constractors for comment.

LONGWOOD GARDENS Kennett Square, PA Observation Report #2, Roschmann Factory Visit Dates of Observation: June 7, 2022 Date of Issue: June 10, 2022

2 . 9 b A s s e m b l e d o p e r a b l e w in d o w f r a m e

The steel block appears much closer than suggested in the shop drawings overall section drawings.

left: assembled fixed frames stored prior to glazing right: inspected assembled fixed frames

LONGWOOD GARDENS Kennett Square, PA Observation Report #2, Roschmann Factory Visit Dates of Observation: June 7, 2022 Date of Issue: June 10, 2022

LONGWOOD GARDENS Kennett Square, PA Observation Report #2, Roschmann Factory Visit Dates of Observation: June 7, 2022 Date of Issue: June 10, 2022 S T R U C T U R AL S I L I C O N E

left: unpainted steel plates; tabs welded prior to finishing right: unpainted steel plate close-up view

2. 10 R osc h ma n n QA /QC On the Left: ongoing assembling the detail visit and the facility in general, thereright: wasn’t evidence QC fabricated procedures or check overlay of two rackduring and pinion within IPE 180 bracket to steel purlin; image of steelof frame in factory lists. There was only evidence of test done on the structural silicone.

Roschmann, please provide a summary of internal QA/QC procedures. Please also confirm frequency of deglazing panels to check for cohesive failure.

left + right: operable steel frame; close up of rack + pinion pivot point

2 . 1 1 A s s e m b l e d f i x e d g l az e d p a n e l Roschmann, please clarify role of these holes The fabricated panels appeared to be well fabricated.

7 13

Shop drawing extract of smallest offset which appears much larger than what was fabricated in the factory.

Roschmann, please provide a drawing of this worst-case condition to clearly show how all of the adjoining components are designed to work. Based on the above overlay, this does not appear coordinated in any previously provided shop drawings

left: stored vertical glass right: stored roof glass End of document

Roschmann to keep same high-quality production.

10

AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works

SELECTED WORKS | Longwood Gardens System Design

8

TYPICAL GUTTER LONGITUDINAL SECTION

6

7

4

5

FIXED RIDGE SECTION

EDGE GUTTER EXTERIOR CANTILEVER SECTION

4

N

DRAWING ORIGINATOR:

12

DRAWN BY:

CON A610

3

North

GUTTER AT DRAIN AND OVERFLOW

2

GUTTER WALL INTERFACE SECTION

1

0

TYP GUTTER SECTION

3" = 1'-0"

4

8

12

WEISS/MANFREDI ARCHITECTS 200 HUDSON ST, 10TH FL, NEW YORK, NY 10013 212.760.9002

DRAWN BY:

CON A611

4

North

FIXED LONGITUDINAL SECTION NEAR RIDGE

3

ADJACENT TO EDGE OF OPERABLE LONGITUDINAL SECTION

8

12

SHEET #:

CON A612

16

North

1/8"=1'

PLAN DETAIL AT EAST AND WEST CURBS

4

TYP FIXED GLAZING CORNER PLAN DETAIL

3

PLAN DETAIL AT NORTH AND SOUTH CURB

TYP FIXED GLAZING DETAIL PLAN NORTH AND SOUTH FACADES

OPERABLE HEAD SECTION E/W FACADES

KEY PLAN

KEY PLAN

KEY PLAN

PRJ # REV COMPANY INITIALS DATE DESCRIPTION 3061 WMA 06/01/18 90% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 3061 WMA 07/03/18 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 3061 WMA 03/16/20 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 3061 WMA 06/22/20 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 3061 WMA 12/18/20 50% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3061 WMA 3/31/21 90% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3061 WMA 4/30/21 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3061 WMA 5/14/21 BID PACKAGE 3061 1 WMA 7/30/21 ADDENDUM 6 3061 2 WMA 8/20/21 ADDENDUM 7 3061 WMA 10/15/21 CONFORMANCE SET

PRJ # REV COMPANY INITIALS DATE DESCRIPTION 3061 WMA 06/01/18 90% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 3061 WMA 07/03/18 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 3061 WMA 03/16/20 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 3061 WMA 06/22/20 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 3061 WMA 12/18/20 50% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3061 WMA 3/31/21 90% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3061 WMA 4/30/21 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3061 WMA 5/14/21 BID PACKAGE 3061 1 WMA 7/30/21 ADDENDUM 6 3061 2 WMA 8/20/21 ADDENDUM 7 3061 WMA 10/15/21 CONFORMANCE SET

CHECKED BY: SCALE:

12/18/2020

OPERABLE SILL SECTION E/W FACADES

0

3" = 1'-0"

4

8

12

1/8"=1'

DRAWING ORIGINATOR:

WEISS/MANFREDI ARCHITECTS 200 HUDSON ST, 10TH FL, NEW YORK, NY 10013 212.760.9002

WEISS/MANFREDI ARCHITECTS 200 HUDSON ST, 10TH FL, NEW YORK, NY 10013 212.760.9002

DRAWN BY:

SHEET #:

DATE:

CON A613 North

WEST CONSERVATORY VERTICAL WALL AND CURB PLAN DETAILS

DRAWING ORIGINATOR:

DRAWING NUMBER:

16

P.O. Box 501 Kennett Square, PA 19348-0501 Ph: (610)388-1000 F: (610)388-5497

P.O. Box 501 Kennett Square, PA 19348-0501 Ph: (610)388-1000 F: (610)388-5497

WEISS/MANFREDI ARCHITECTS 200 HUDSON ST, 10TH FL, NEW YORK, NY 10013 212.760.9002

DRAWN BY:

PRJ # REV COMPANY INITIALS DATE DESCRIPTION 3061 WMA 06/01/18 90% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 3061 WMA 07/03/18 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 3061 WMA 03/16/20 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 3061 WMA 06/22/20 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 3061 WMA 12/18/20 50% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3061 WMA 3/31/21 90% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3061 WMA 4/30/21 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3061 WMA 5/14/21 BID PACKAGE 3061 1 WMA 7/30/21 ADDENDUM 6 3061 2 WMA 8/20/21 ADDENDUM 7 3061 WMA 10/15/21 CONFORMANCE SET

WEST CONSERVATORY VERTICAL WALL PLAN DETAILS

DRAWING ORIGINATOR:

DATE:

1

3" = 1'-0"

4

O N S EL TR EA UC SE TIO

TYP OPERABLE GLAZING DETAIL PLAN EAST AND WEST FACADES

P.O. Box 501 Kennett Square, PA 19348-0501 Ph: (610)388-1000 F: (610)388-5497

OPERABLE SILL SECTION N/S FACADES

0

TYP FIXED GLAZING DETAIL PLAN EAST AND WEST FACADES

WEST CONSERVATORY VERTICAL WALL SECTION DETAILS

2

1

WITHIN GANGED OPERABLE LONGITUDINAL SECTION

FIXED HORIZONTAL SECTION E/W FACADES

5

OPERABLE SILL SECTION N/S FACADES

2

EDGE OF OPERABLE LONGITUDINAL SECTION

DRAWING NUMBER:

CHECKED BY: SCALE:

12/18/2020

16

C

O N S EL TR EA UC SE TIO

R

C

DRAWING ORIGINATOR:

DATE:

SHEET #:

1/8"=1'

N

1/8"=1'

SCALE:

12/18/2020

16

DRAWING NUMBER:

CHECKED BY:

DATE:

SHEET #:

N

3" = 1'-0" 8

WEISS/MANFREDI ARCHITECTS 200 HUDSON ST, 10TH FL, NEW YORK, NY 10013 212.760.9002

DRAWING NUMBER:

CHECKED BY: SCALE:

4

R

0

OPERABLE RIDGE SECTION

P.O. Box 501 Kennett Square, PA 19348-0501 Ph: (610)388-1000 F: (610)388-5497

WEST CONSERVATORY SECTIONAL ROOF DETAILS

3

3

TYP END OF CANTILEVER

P.O. Box 501 Kennett Square, PA 19348-0501 Ph: (610)388-1000 F: (610)388-5497

4

4

5

WEST CONSERVATORY SECTIONAL GUTTER DETAILS

7

OPERABLE HEAD SECTION N/S FACADES

TYP END OF CANTILEVER

KEY PLAN

WEISS/MANFREDI ARCHITECTS 200 HUDSON ST, 10TH FL, NEW YORK, NY 10013 212.760.9002

5

6

PRJ # REV COMPANY INITIALS DATE DESCRIPTION 3061 WMA 06/01/18 90% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 3061 WMA 07/03/18 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 3061 WMA 03/16/20 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 3061 WMA 06/22/20 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 3061 WMA 12/18/20 50% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3061 WMA 3/31/21 90% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3061 WMA 4/30/21 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3061 WMA 5/14/21 BID PACKAGE 3061 1 WMA 7/30/21 ADDENDUM 6 3061 2 WMA 8/20/21 ADDENDUM 7 3061 WMA 10/15/21 CONFORMANCE SET

12/18/2020

6

TYP MULLION LONGITUDINAL SECTION

KEY PLAN

DRAWN BY:

1

7

PRJ # REV COMPANY INITIALS DATE DESCRIPTION 3061 WMA 06/01/18 90% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 3061 WMA 07/03/18 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 3061 WMA 03/16/20 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 3061 WMA 06/22/20 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 3061 WMA 12/18/20 50% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3061 WMA 3/31/21 90% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3061 WMA 4/30/21 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3061 WMA 5/14/21 BID PACKAGE 3061 1 WMA 7/30/21 ADDENDUM 6 3061 2 WMA 8/20/21 ADDENDUM 7 3061 WMA 10/15/21 CONFORMANCE SET

DRAWING ORIGINATOR:

2

TYP LONGITUDINAL SECTION ELEVATION AT GUTTER AND COLUMN LINE

KEY PLAN

DATE:

3

9

PRJ # REV COMPANY INITIALS DATE DESCRIPTION 3061 WMA 06/01/18 90% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 3061 WMA 07/03/18 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN 3061 WMA 03/16/20 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 3061 WMA 06/22/20 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 3061 WMA 12/18/20 50% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3061 WMA 3/31/21 90% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3061 WMA 4/30/21 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3061 WMA 5/14/21 BID PACKAGE 3061 1 WMA 7/30/21 ADDENDUM 6 3061 2 WMA 8/20/21 ADDENDUM 7 3061 WMA 10/15/21 CONFORMANCE SET

P.O. Box 501 Kennett Square, PA 19348-0501 Ph: (610)388-1000 F: (610)388-5497

OPERABLE SILL SECTION

OPERABLE-TO-OPERABLE LONGITUDINAL SECTION

TYP LONGITUDINAL SECTION ELEVATION AT GUTTER

TYP EXTERIOR CANTILEVER GUTTER SECTION

WEST CONSERVATORY SECTIONAL ROOF DETAILS

OPERABLE SILL SECTION AT CHAIN DRIVE

8

10

N

FIXED TRANSVERSE SECTION

DIAGRAMMATIC REFLECTED CEILING PLAN AT TYPICAL GUTTER

O N S EL TR EA UC SE TIO

5

11 TYPICAL GUTTER AT VERTICAL WALL INTERFACE AND DRAIN

C

FIXED TRANSVERSE SECTION

TYPICAL GUTTER AT EDGE BEAM LONGITUDINAL SECTION

R

6

C O N R ST EL R EA UC SE TIO

N C O N R ST EL R EA UC SE TIO

C O N R ST EL R EA UC SE TIO

N

Herein is a snapshot of drawings produced for the tender package. Included in the project are two types of operables: bespoke over-sized roof operables and vertical bifolding doors. Included were bespoke system extrusions paired with standard systems to manage costs while maintaining the desired design intent.

2

TYP OPERABLE GLAZING CORNER PLAN DETAIL

1

TYP OPERABLE GLAZING DETAIL PLAN NORTH AND SOUTH FACADES

0

3" = 1'-0"

4

8

DRAWN BY:

DRAWING NUMBER:

CHECKED BY: SCALE:

12/18/2020

12

1/8"=1'

North

SCALE:

12/18/2020

CON A614

16

2

TYP SILL PLAN DETAIL EAST AND WEST FACADES

1

TYP SILL PLAN DETAIL NORTH AND SOUTH FACADES

0

DRAWING NUMBER:

CHECKED BY:

DATE:

SHEET #:

3" = 1'-0"

4

8

12

1/8"=1'

SHEET #:

CON A615

16

North

AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works

SELECTED WORKS | Pendry Hotel

Pendry Hotel Location: New York, USA Architect: SOM Role: Facade Consultant + Associate Scope: Design Development - Construction Administration Responsibilities included: - System detailing and development in 2D (AutoCAD) and 3D (Rhino3D) - Material and system research - Bidding and negotiation reviews - Shop drawing review - Performance mock-up review

AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works

SELECTED WORKS | Pendry Hotel Material Research Working initially from a rendering as the design intent, studies and research was done to determine the best option for the horizontal banding at each floor. Because the design intent was to have a dark spandrel panel that had a natural appearance, metal panel was not considered. Instead, precast and natural stone was reviewed for longevity, aesthetic viability, weight, and cost.

AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works

SELECTED WORKS | Pendry Hotel Material Research Similar to the spandrel panel, the glass used on the project needed to meet the design intent while responding to programmed interior spaces and the undulating/curved glass that introduced both concave and convex units to the project. Back-paininting, alternating low-e coatings, and bodytinted glass were all studied during the selection process.

AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works

SELECTED WORKS | Pendry Hotel Rendering vs. Reality Reference images showing how the final system design and built work closely resemblers the original design intent. Through mock-ups using samples and full-scale studies, the options were narrowed to best represent the design intent.

Rendering courtesy of SOM

Photo by Michael Young

AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works

AINSLEY MCMASTER | Selected Works end of document