202
D I R E I TO ,
T E C N O LO G I A E C U LT U R A
FROOMKIN, A. Michael. The metaphor is the key: cryptography, the clipper chip, and the Constitution. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, v. 143, n. 709, 1995. ______. It came from planet clipper: the battle over cryptographic key “escrow”. University of Chicago Legal Forum, v. 15, 1996a. ______. Regulation and computing and information technology: flood control on the information ocean: living with anonymity, digital cash, and distributed databases. U. Pittsburgh J. Law & Com., v. 15, n. 395, 1996b. ______. The internet as a source of regulatory arbitrage. In: KAHIN, Brian; NESSON, Charles (Ed.). Borders in cyberspace. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996c. ______. The death of privacy? Stan. L. Rev., v. 52, n. 1.461, 2000a. ______. Wrong turn in cyberspace: using Icann to route around the APA and the Constitution. Duke L. J., v. 50, n. 17, 2000b. FUJITA, Anne K. The great internet panic: how digitization is deforming copyright law. J. Tech. L. and Pol’y, v. 2, n. 1, 1996. GANDELMAN, Henrique. De Gutenberg à internet. São Paulo: Record, 2001. GASAWAY, Laura N. Impasse: distance learning and copyright. Ohio St. L. J., v. 62, n. 783, 2001. GASKIN, James E. Corporate politics and the internet. Prentice Hall, 1997. GEISSLER, R. Jonas. Whether “anti-spam” laws violate the First Amendment. Journal of Online Law, 2001. GEIST, Michael A. Where can you go today? The computerization of legal education from workbooks to the web. Harv. J. L. & Tech., v. 11, n. 141, 1997. GIBBONS, Llewellyn Joseph. No regulation, government regulation, or self-regulation: social enforcement or social contracting for governance in cyberspace. Cornell J. L. & Pub. Pol’y, v. 6, n. 475, 1997. GIMBEL, Mark. Some thoughts on the implications of trusted systems for intellectual property law. Stanford Law Review, v. 50, 1998. GOLDFOOT, Josh A. Antitrust implications of internet administration. Va. L. Rev., v. 84, n. 909, 1998.