Developing HR Policies: Laws and Policies Discussion

Discussion Board Developing HR Policies: Laws and Policies Discussion Difference Between A Policy and A Law A policy refers to an organization or an individual’s outlines of what it intends to do and achieve for an entire society (Cheung, 2019). A policy also details the specific things that a government does not plan to accomplish and the various principles that entities should follow to obtain a particular goal. Courts do not get involved in policy implementation, are less formal since their records are kept in less legal documents. An example of a policy is an anti-harassment policy. In contrast, a law is a standard that an authority sets in society to be followed by its members

Buy this excellently written paper or order a fresh one from acemyhomework.com

LAWS AND POLICIES2 The purpose of a statute is to maintain justice, and it is more formal since, in the occurrence of law breakage, it is the court that presides over the matter. Furthermore, a law is published in law books and constitution. An example of law may include no driving while drunk.

Does A Company Policy Override A Local, State, Or Federal Law or Does A Local, State, Or Federal Law Override A Company Policy? Provide Justification for Your Reasoning Local, state, or federal law requires every organization under its jurisdiction to formulate various policies that conform to its requirements and must abide by all its rules. Despite the size or reputation, abiding by the local, state, or federal laws are mandatory to provide validity to its policies. According to Mayhew (2018), federal and state laws govern human resource policies and protect employees’ rights and formulate every employer's obligations. Moreover, organizations must refer to federal and state employment laws related to anti-discrimination, safety, compensation, concerted activity, and benefits before implementing their human resource policies (Mayhew, 2018). Besides, local laws also govern companies’ employment practices.

Thus, regional, state, and federal laws override a company’s policy.

Research and Describe an Example of An Incident When A Company Broke A Federal, State, Or Local Law. What Were the Consequences of Breaking the Law? What Policies Did the Company Change Because Of The Incident?

An example of an incident where a company broke a federal law was the case of the Bosch Doboy packaging equipment factory in New Richmond (News Release, 2010). According to the report by News Release, Bosch Doboy’s management demanded their employees resume work through a one-week notice or replaced them permanently with new workers (2010). The workers of this organization had been on strike, and through the threat of permanent replacement, the company interrupted their right to strike. The United States law prohibits the use of threats to

LAWS AND POLICIES3 deny employees their rights. Besides, News Release (2010) reported that the International Labor Organization (ILO) Committee on Freedom of Association provides that breaking employees’ strike violates their right to freedom of association. Thus, Bosch Doboy disregarded state law.

LAWS AND POLICIES4 References Cheung, D. (2019). Law vs. Policy. What's the Difference? Career & Internship Center | University of Washington. Retrieved 22 October 2020, from https://careers.uw.edu/blog/2019/10/13/law-vs-policy-whats-the-difference/#:~:text= %E2%80%9CPolicy%20is%20the%20outlines%20of,the%20society%20as%20a %20whole.&text=%E2%80%9CLaws%20are%20set%20standards%2C %20principles,implementing%20justice%20in%20the%20society.

News Release. (2010). A Strange Case. Human Rights Watch. Retrieved 22 October 2020, from https://www.hrw.org/report/2010/09/02/strange-case/violations-workers-freedomassociation-united-states-european.

Mayhew, R. (2018). Federal & State Laws Governing HR Policies. Legal Beagle. Retrieved 22 October 2020, from https://legalbeagle.com/13343295-federal-state-laws-governing-hrpolicies.html.