The Dangers of Groupthink

The Dangers of Groupthink Hello Jonathon, I can see that you were a good decision-maker even before studying the decision my decision-making process. The ability to gather information, analyze it, and evaluate options without academic knowledge of decision-making is very commendable. Your real-world example, the invasion of the Bay of Pigs, is a fantastic example, even though we only consider the incident a groupthink because the mission failed. The story proves that no matter how strong a group is, overconfidence in its ability and underestimation of the challenges can make it difficult to overcome challenges that may seem minor, even in the eyes of outsiders. Groupthink can make team members not to prepare for uncertainties, and this can make teams vulnerable (Akhmad, 2021). The failure of the Bay of Pigs is a perfect illustration that groupthink can make teams underestimate challenges and develop a fallacy that they are best, then fail terribly.

Overall, your post is very insightful and articulate.

Buy this excellently written paper or order a fresh one from acemyhomework.com

Reference.

Akhmad, M., Chang, S., & Deguchi, H. (2021). Closed-mindedness and insulation in groupthink: their effects and the devil’s advocacy as a preventive measure. Journal of Computational

Social Science, pp. 4, 455–478. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42001-02000083-8

Classmate 2 Hello. I like the fact that you used an incident that you experienced as an example, as this proves that you can relate the concepts learned in class to your own experiences. Many classmates have used historical events for their posts. I also like how you have given a comprehensive account of the incident. However, you failed to mention why you feel that the incident is an example of groupthink. I think groupthink is a phenomenon where a group of individuals prioritizes consensus and conformity over critical thinking and independent analysis (Kenton, 2022). Groupthink often leads to flawed decision-making and the suppression of dissenting opinions. In your example, the group members gathered and discussed their expertise, which indicates a collaborative and inclusive approach that is not always common in groups affected by groupthink. You have mentioned how you used to make decisions in the military. I think it is very insightful; however, it is important to note that decisions made while on military duties are not typical since individuals are required to take commands from higher-ranking officials and abide by them.

References.

Kenton, W. (2022, December 5). What is groupthink? Definition, characteristics, and causes.

Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/groupthink.asp

Classmate 3 Hello. Firstly, I must acknowledge your self-awareness in acknowledging that spending too much time gathering information can sometimes hurt the decision-making process. This shows a recognition of the need for efficiency and time management in the decision-making process. Additionally, your openness to learning and adapting your decision-making methods based on the information provided in the lesson on decision-making is commendable. Time and results have a great impact on how one should make decisions. When there is little time, people tend to rush decisions, and when the impact of the decision is minor, people tend to give the decision little attention. Your post is concise and very articulate; however, I feel that your realworld example of groupthink is overly brief; you have mentioned the incident rather than discussing it. I understand that sources like Sorscher (2017) confirm that the incident was an example of groupthink; however, I must admit that I could not get this from your post, and I had to do some Google searches.

References Sorscher, S. (2017, December 7). Groupthink caused the market to fail. HuffPost. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/group-think-caused-the-ma_b_604810

Classmate Four Hello, I agree with you that groupthink is marked by conformity and a lack of interest in evaluating diverse opinions. One strength I have noticed in your post is your openness to refining your decision-making approach based on the lessons learned. The incorporation of additional considerations after reading the lesson on decision-making shows your willingness to adapt and improve your decision-making process and your overall skills. One point that has surprised me in your post is your assertion that after reading the lesson, you think it is a good idea to create an environment where dissenting opinions are encouraged and welcomed. I think it is important to address all concerns and opinions (dissenting or complementary) that arise from members during decision-making. However, I don't think encouraging dissenting opinions is a fantastic idea as it makes the decision-making process lengthy (Grubb Wealth Management n.d.). It is important to note that this is just a matter of opinion. One area that I feel you should improve is referencing.

When you cite information from a website where the author's name is not mentioned, you should use the website title in the in-text citation. You should have therefore used (Foundation for Critical Thinking, n.d.) instead of (Critical et al.).

Reference Grubb Wealth Management. (2019, July 16). Listening to dissenting opinions drives better business outcomes. https://grubbwealth.com/listening-to-dissenting-opinions-drivesbetter-business-outcomes/