Esch Sintzel Architekten

the architects themselves choose to use un­ usual analogies to describe their highly ­structured, seemingly randomly formed architectural volumes – derived, for instance, from geology – this in fact only concerns the side facing the railway tracks. Facing the street, the buildings are staged calmly and almost conventionally. Here they indeed act as part of the fabric, completing it with a seam towards the railway tracks. The splicing with the urban fabric is normal and conventional. The boundary, on the other hand, is specific and unique.4

A NON-OBTRUSIVE BEAUTY That architecture is a backdrop is a claim by Hermann Czech5 that Esch Sintzel like to refer to (see the essay by Ákos Moravánszky, p. 321). Taken at face value, the statement is not without its pitfalls. Quite apart from the fact that it conceals the reality that monuments can perhaps attract attention for good reasons, it could also easily be misunderstood as an invitation to flirt with banality, to generally damn the extraordinary or even to excuse the sloppiness of the mainstream.

But this statement cannot be reversed (and Czech naturally never claimed that it could be). Regarding a possible architecture of the tessuto, what is in fact decisive is that background alone by no means automa­t­ ically constitutes architecture.

Nonetheless, a phenomenon becomes apparent when experiencing historic cities (not even necessarily in Italy!), for instance drinking a coffee on a square ringed by a variety of buildings. Somewhat weary, one pays little attention to most of them. They form the urban surroundings, the backdrop to life (to use Czech’s expression). They are part of the fabric.

But suddenly, casting an idle glance around, perhaps one’s gaze becomes fixed. One recognises, for instance, an attractive entrance, and then notices that it’s part of a well-composed facade. It is probably a déformation professionelle if one then goes on to ask oneself how the composition works and what makes it appealing, beginning to speculate

about proportions and admiring the elegance of the profile. Nonetheless, all of us with an affinity for architecture undoubtedly know the occasional feeling of being struck by a sudden gleam of quality – or, to console ourselves, beauty – breaking through one’s general sense of distraction.

Czech says that architecture should only speak when asked.6 In this case, however, the reverse is also true. Architecture, if it claims to be such, has to be able to withstand a second and also a third glance, and then begin to speak.7 Even if it primarily p ­ resents itself as background and a part of the urban fabric, the more closely one looks at it, the more qualities it reveals, only then to unfurl a delightful richness. Like this, it finds its place in the imagin­ary Museum of Architectures, albeit not by virtue of its conspicuousness or its model character, but rather based on its quality. This lies, not least, in the richness of architecture and the adoption and interpretation of the typical in a perhaps cautious yet characteristic manner.

It is precisely this sort of beauty that pervades the Zollstrasse buildings, and indeed is char­ acteristic of all of Esch Sintzel’s architecture.

How the protrusion of the triangular bay ­windows in the calm street-front facade initiates the animated railway frontage and at the same time acts as an adaptation of the cut-off corners typical for the neighbourhood; how the regular order of the columns is en­ livened by variations; how finely calibrated the mediation is between large and small – from the colossal order of the columns to the texture of the parapet railings; how harmoniously the horizontality and verticality in the relief of the infills interact; and how, in all of this, the residential variety is made apparent without becoming domineering. All of this (and much more besides) is namely there but is not ­obtrusive.

IMPROVING THE CONTEXT It goes without saying that an architecture of the tessuto must be contextual. In the work of an office, the range of sites leads, perforce,

17

the architects themselves choose to use un­ usual analogies to describe their highly ­structured, seemingly randomly formed architectural volumes – derived, for instance, from geology – this in fact only concerns the side facing the railway tracks. Facing the street, the buildings are staged calmly and almost conventionally. Here they indeed act as part of the fabric, completing it with a seam towards the railway tracks. The splicing with the urban fabric is normal and conventional. The boundary, on the other hand, is specific and unique.4

A NON-OBTRUSIVE BEAUTY That architecture is a backdrop is a claim by Hermann Czech5 that Esch Sintzel like to refer to (see the essay by Ákos Moravánszky, p. 321). Taken at face value, the statement is not without its pitfalls. Quite apart from the fact that it conceals the reality that monuments can perhaps attract attention for good reasons, it could also easily be misunderstood as an invitation to flirt with banality, to generally damn the extraordinary or even to excuse the sloppiness of the mainstream.

But this statement cannot be reversed (and Czech naturally never claimed that it could be). Regarding a possible architecture of the tessuto, what is in fact decisive is that background alone by no means automa­t­ ically constitutes architecture.

Nonetheless, a phenomenon becomes apparent when experiencing historic cities (not even necessarily in Italy!), for instance drinking a coffee on a square ringed by a variety of buildings. Somewhat weary, one pays little attention to most of them. They form the urban surroundings, the backdrop to life (to use Czech’s expression). They are part of the fabric.

But suddenly, casting an idle glance around, perhaps one’s gaze becomes fixed. One recognises, for instance, an attractive entrance, and then notices that it’s part of a well-composed facade. It is probably a déformation professionelle if one then goes on to ask oneself how the composition works and what makes it appealing, beginning to speculate

about proportions and admiring the elegance of the profile. Nonetheless, all of us with an affinity for architecture undoubtedly know the occasional feeling of being struck by a sudden gleam of quality – or, to console ourselves, beauty – breaking through one’s general sense of distraction.

Czech says that architecture should only speak when asked.6 In this case, however, the reverse is also true. Architecture, if it claims to be such, has to be able to withstand a second and also a third glance, and then begin to speak.7 Even if it primarily p ­ resents itself as background and a part of the urban fabric, the more closely one looks at it, the more qualities it reveals, only then to unfurl a delightful richness. Like this, it finds its place in the imagin­ary Museum of Architectures, albeit not by virtue of its conspicuousness or its model character, but rather based on its quality. This lies, not least, in the richness of architecture and the adoption and interpretation of the typical in a perhaps cautious yet characteristic manner.

It is precisely this sort of beauty that pervades the Zollstrasse buildings, and indeed is char­ acteristic of all of Esch Sintzel’s architecture.

How the protrusion of the triangular bay ­windows in the calm street-front facade initiates the animated railway frontage and at the same time acts as an adaptation of the cut-off corners typical for the neighbourhood; how the regular order of the columns is en­ livened by variations; how finely calibrated the mediation is between large and small – from the colossal order of the columns to the texture of the parapet railings; how harmoniously the horizontality and verticality in the relief of the infills interact; and how, in all of this, the residential variety is made apparent without becoming domineering. All of this (and much more besides) is namely there but is not ­obtrusive.

IMPROVING THE CONTEXT It goes without saying that an architecture of the tessuto must be contextual. In the work of an office, the range of sites leads, perforce,

17

the architects themselves choose to use un­ usual analogies to describe their highly ­structured, seemingly randomly formed architectural volumes – derived, for instance, from geology – this in fact only concerns the side facing the railway tracks. Facing the street, the buildings are staged calmly and almost conventionally. Here they indeed act as part of the fabric, completing it with a seam towards the railway tracks. The splicing with the urban fabric is normal and conventional. The boundary, on the other hand, is specific and unique.4

A NON-OBTRUSIVE BEAUTY That architecture is a backdrop is a claim by Hermann Czech5 that Esch Sintzel like to refer to (see the essay by Ákos Moravánszky, p. 321). Taken at face value, the statement is not without its pitfalls. Quite apart from the fact that it conceals the reality that monuments can perhaps attract attention for good reasons, it could also easily be misunderstood as an invitation to flirt with banality, to generally damn the extraordinary or even to excuse the sloppiness of the mainstream.

But this statement cannot be reversed (and Czech naturally never claimed that it could be). Regarding a possible architecture of the tessuto, what is in fact decisive is that background alone by no means automa­t­ ically constitutes architecture.

Nonetheless, a phenomenon becomes apparent when experiencing historic cities (not even necessarily in Italy!), for instance drinking a coffee on a square ringed by a variety of buildings. Somewhat weary, one pays little attention to most of them. They form the urban surroundings, the backdrop to life (to use Czech’s expression). They are part of the fabric.

But suddenly, casting an idle glance around, perhaps one’s gaze becomes fixed. One recognises, for instance, an attractive entrance, and then notices that it’s part of a well-composed facade. It is probably a déformation professionelle if one then goes on to ask oneself how the composition works and what makes it appealing, beginning to speculate

about proportions and admiring the elegance of the profile. Nonetheless, all of us with an affinity for architecture undoubtedly know the occasional feeling of being struck by a sudden gleam of quality – or, to console ourselves, beauty – breaking through one’s general sense of distraction.

Czech says that architecture should only speak when asked.6 In this case, however, the reverse is also true. Architecture, if it claims to be such, has to be able to withstand a second and also a third glance, and then begin to speak.7 Even if it primarily p ­ resents itself as background and a part of the urban fabric, the more closely one looks at it, the more qualities it reveals, only then to unfurl a delightful richness. Like this, it finds its place in the imagin­ary Museum of Architectures, albeit not by virtue of its conspicuousness or its model character, but rather based on its quality. This lies, not least, in the richness of architecture and the adoption and interpretation of the typical in a perhaps cautious yet characteristic manner.

It is precisely this sort of beauty that pervades the Zollstrasse buildings, and indeed is char­ acteristic of all of Esch Sintzel’s architecture.

How the protrusion of the triangular bay ­windows in the calm street-front facade initiates the animated railway frontage and at the same time acts as an adaptation of the cut-off corners typical for the neighbourhood; how the regular order of the columns is en­ livened by variations; how finely calibrated the mediation is between large and small – from the colossal order of the columns to the texture of the parapet railings; how harmoniously the horizontality and verticality in the relief of the infills interact; and how, in all of this, the residential variety is made apparent without becoming domineering. All of this (and much more besides) is namely there but is not ­obtrusive.

IMPROVING THE CONTEXT It goes without saying that an architecture of the tessuto must be contextual. In the work of an office, the range of sites leads, perforce,

17

the wall. Finally, the complementary clampings of the window ledge and the skirting board integrate the window niche and the facade wall into the shape of the room.

Here the constructional configuration of the wall therefore provides welcome scope to ­design the wall relief, with the help of ledges and boards, as a dovetailing of layers that ­spatially relate the room with the outside – and this in a far more pronounced fashion than the window openings alone would allow.

Whereas inside the room emphasis is put on the horizontality that the columns impart to the progression of the chromatically ho­moge­nous walls, the design of the exterior facade stresses the verticality, in keeping with the standing nature of the building. God forbid, therefore, that anyone could imagine that the arrangement of the wall literally depicts its constructional structure!

Ultimately, the choice of materials and building methods also has to do with the whole: solid and worthy materials, but by no means a ­material fetishism; practicality and flexible scope, but by no means social sculpture; sustainability, of course, but by no means eco­ logical architecture. The list is endless.

This commitment to “the difficult whole”10 may seem self-evident, but the recent past has shown how tempting it is to conceptualise solitary aspects of architecture and to then sub­ordinate everything else to them. This has resulted in innumerable spectacular and ­innovative buildings, but their one-sidedness has rarely made them durable. The fear is that this also applies to those who now fully subscribe to the currently prominent topics of energy efficiency and net zero. Real sustain­ ability, however, is only achievable if we take it ser­iously in its entire circumference. It’s about the whole that architecture – if we believe the ­ancients – has always wanted to be. That individual factors have to be constantly reappraised is obvious. A double-skinned brick wall coursing like in Brunnmatt in Bern would no longer be a solution today, and even columned a ­ rchitecture like in Zollstrasse in Zurich would probably now cause heated debates.

THE PRIVATE AND THE PUBLIC Threshold spaces, with their double or multiple identities between the city and the building, public and private, or inside and outside, play an important role in the work of Esch Sintzel.

They are part of their stance to combine as many elements and aspects of architecture as possible and to integrate them together in terms of their dependencies. This may well be an echo of Philipp Esch’s experience as a trainee with Herman Hertzberger or Stephan Sintzel’s as an apprentice with Rolf Keller: for both of them the design of transitional spaces is one of the key tasks in architecture, as also demanded by their master Aldo von Eyck.

Threshold spaces shield the private and the public to an equal degree, at the same time opening up scope for social interaction.

The porches in the Kuppe project on the Trift in Horgen and in the courtyard in Maiengasse in Basel are spaces like these, but similarly the expansive entrance halls and the freely accessible garden courtyard in Brunnmatt in Bern, or the central entrance and the inner streetways in the former wine warehouse in Basel. The list could go on, but all of their ­projects have similar spaces that oscillate between public and private, often even at different scales. Even the planned building with miniature apartments at the exposed train-­ station site in Winterthur has generous, interconnected stairway halls, laundry rooms and working spaces that are accessible to all the residents.

In the last resort, Esch Sintzel give the claims of the city priority over those of the individual apartments, even outside the city centres.

This is the significant discovery that emerged from the lengthy design process for the Oberzelg residential scheme in Winterthur Sennhof (see pp. 96–113). This project makes it ­particularly clear to what extent urban deve­lopment and apartments are interrelated.

The beneficiary of this is not only the urban environment but equally the residents. A good apartment is one that is well-situated – a pithy statement by Michael Alder that those in

33

Wohnanlage Brunnmatt-Ost, Bern

nanlage Brunnmatt-Ost, Bern

QUERSCHNITT/CROSS SECTION

QUERSCHNITT/CROSS SECTION

ATTIKAGESCHOSS/ TOP FLOOR

1 1

2

5

DinA3 quer

hnanlage Brunnmatt-Ost, Bern

2

ERDGESCHOSS/GROUND FLOOR

64

Wohnanlage Brunnmatt-Ost

Attikageschoss 1:5

Wohnanlage Brunnmatt-Ost, Bern

2. OBERGESCHOSS/SECOND FLOOR

1 Längsschnitt 1:500

DinA3 quer

DinA3 quer Querschnitt B 1:500

LÄNGSSCHNITT/LONGITUDINAL SECTION

5

5

Querschnitt A 1:500

2

5

DinA3 quer

1. + 3. OBERGESCHOSS/FIRST AND THIRD FLOORS

2. Obergeschoss 1:

0

5

65

the wall. Finally, the complementary clampings of the window ledge and the skirting board integrate the window niche and the facade wall into the shape of the room.

Here the constructional configuration of the wall therefore provides welcome scope to ­design the wall relief, with the help of ledges and boards, as a dovetailing of layers that ­spatially relate the room with the outside – and this in a far more pronounced fashion than the window openings alone would allow.

Whereas inside the room emphasis is put on the horizontality that the columns impart to the progression of the chromatically ho­moge­nous walls, the design of the exterior facade stresses the verticality, in keeping with the standing nature of the building. God forbid, therefore, that anyone could imagine that the arrangement of the wall literally depicts its constructional structure!

Ultimately, the choice of materials and building methods also has to do with the whole: solid and worthy materials, but by no means a ­material fetishism; practicality and flexible scope, but by no means social sculpture; sustainability, of course, but by no means eco­ logical architecture. The list is endless.

This commitment to “the difficult whole”10 may seem self-evident, but the recent past has shown how tempting it is to conceptualise solitary aspects of architecture and to then sub­ordinate everything else to them. This has resulted in innumerable spectacular and ­innovative buildings, but their one-sidedness has rarely made them durable. The fear is that this also applies to those who now fully subscribe to the currently prominent topics of energy efficiency and net zero. Real sustain­ ability, however, is only achievable if we take it ser­iously in its entire circumference. It’s about the whole that architecture – if we believe the ­ancients – has always wanted to be. That individual factors have to be constantly reappraised is obvious. A double-skinned brick wall coursing like in Brunnmatt in Bern would no longer be a solution today, and even columned a ­ rchitecture like in Zollstrasse in Zurich would probably now cause heated debates.

THE PRIVATE AND THE PUBLIC Threshold spaces, with their double or multiple identities between the city and the building, public and private, or inside and outside, play an important role in the work of Esch Sintzel.

They are part of their stance to combine as many elements and aspects of architecture as possible and to integrate them together in terms of their dependencies. This may well be an echo of Philipp Esch’s experience as a trainee with Herman Hertzberger or Stephan Sintzel’s as an apprentice with Rolf Keller: for both of them the design of transitional spaces is one of the key tasks in architecture, as also demanded by their master Aldo von Eyck.

Threshold spaces shield the private and the public to an equal degree, at the same time opening up scope for social interaction.

The porches in the Kuppe project on the Trift in Horgen and in the courtyard in Maiengasse in Basel are spaces like these, but similarly the expansive entrance halls and the freely accessible garden courtyard in Brunnmatt in Bern, or the central entrance and the inner streetways in the former wine warehouse in Basel. The list could go on, but all of their ­projects have similar spaces that oscillate between public and private, often even at different scales. Even the planned building with miniature apartments at the exposed train-­ station site in Winterthur has generous, interconnected stairway halls, laundry rooms and working spaces that are accessible to all the residents.

In the last resort, Esch Sintzel give the claims of the city priority over those of the individual apartments, even outside the city centres.

This is the significant discovery that emerged from the lengthy design process for the Oberzelg residential scheme in Winterthur Sennhof (see pp. 96–113). This project makes it ­particularly clear to what extent urban deve­lopment and apartments are interrelated.

The beneficiary of this is not only the urban environment but equally the residents. A good apartment is one that is well-situated – a pithy statement by Michael Alder that those in

33

Wohnanlage Brunnmatt-Ost, Bern

nanlage Brunnmatt-Ost, Bern

QUERSCHNITT/CROSS SECTION

QUERSCHNITT/CROSS SECTION

ATTIKAGESCHOSS/ TOP FLOOR

1 1

2

5

DinA3 quer

hnanlage Brunnmatt-Ost, Bern

2

ERDGESCHOSS/GROUND FLOOR

64

Wohnanlage Brunnmatt-Ost

Attikageschoss 1:5

Wohnanlage Brunnmatt-Ost, Bern

2. OBERGESCHOSS/SECOND FLOOR

1 Längsschnitt 1:500

DinA3 quer

DinA3 quer Querschnitt B 1:500

LÄNGSSCHNITT/LONGITUDINAL SECTION

5

5

Querschnitt A 1:500

2

5

DinA3 quer

1. + 3. OBERGESCHOSS/FIRST AND THIRD FLOORS

2. Obergeschoss 1:

0

5

65

157

r in 2e p1 Ty in nd

ste ph as a lz W

12

608.37

60

M

e ir dr

8 60

0 7.8 60

ng

sp

er

im

et

er

60

609.32

609.20

1 .7

M

60

ar

kt

pl

%

9.

at

60

40

z

609.14 9.2

9.1

1.7

5

0 7.6 60

40

0

60 Za

un

ne

u

607.

20

607.

9 60 60 9.2

9.4

9.0

.08 4

OK

Da

mm

60

5

9.4

0

sc ge

hn

itt

en

eH

eck

ud

en

pfla

nz

OK

60

8.8

im et5.40 er

80

60

.60

sper

605

605.

606.2

606.00

0

0 6.6

.40

60

606

607.

7.

00 6.8 0

20

Bea

rbei

607.40

607.60

607.80

0 1.8

un

Da

g

mm

60

9.1

0

Be

arb

eit

u

M OK

g un

sp

8

%

9 60

.0

5

605.20

erim

e te

rM

ark

OK

60

Da

60

m

m

8

6

.

08

ne

60

ne

60

607.87

607.76

5

8.7

0

0

8.2

7.5

7

607.80

e te rim

60

gs un eit

607.

60 607.

60

69

40

20

60

7

7.3

9

.90

8 60 UK mm Da OK 60 8.2 60 7 8.4 0 tz tpla

Treppe 608.20 int 60

607.20

60 8.2 8.2 5 3

60

60

60

8.3

60

4

8.3

9

60

8.3

6

53m

e

f up

en

ga

ss

e

7.3

2

7.0

41

0

7

605.

60

5

.84

60

5.7

605.80

Garten best.

60

6.5

ter Markt

platz

60

6.9

7

8

20

40

605.60

5.7

Garagen

60 5 60

.61

8 6.6 60 Kiesrasen

ngsperime

pe

45

607.

60

8 60 60 8.1 2

7

Bearbeitu

8.6

60

arb

mm

m

.57

2.0

0

OK

Da

m Da

607.60

8.0

5.2

Walzasphalt

Asphalt neu

607.66

60

5.3

neu

tz

60

UK

0

.40

Be

S ta

608.45

.5 08

71

5

607.06

607.47

ark

r

g nz pfla en

8.6

8 60

7.9

60

Pflanzfläche 606 60 5.8 neu 2

0

M

60

608.03

608.65

5 7.8

u

0 2.

608.19

tpla

mm Da OK

cm

ud

m

D

m

Rin

2

605.

.33

Treppe Ersatz

Speier

10

9

UK

am

0 .3

5.0

Zufahrt

% 0.2

0.

607.85

60

Mauer

608.10

607.

8.5

0

un

40

G 37m

608.00

608.20

608.40

% 3 2. %

2 2. ne r in en ad

S ta

tung

% 4.3

% 2 .7

60 8.

60

Fa

1

.80

%

60

hr ke

er nv

27

ah

8.

nb

60

Ei % ca

.0

.9

M Z u fa ar kt h rt pl at z

8.4

0 8.8 60

8.8

608

ke

60

äs tw En 0 8.2 60

8. ) 10

34

8.

60

äs

d.

608.45

m Da

.6 08

0

ec

itu

Rinne ne

60

8.

P 50 N o lle at r, ur st ei n

60

60

ne in ru se

M Zuf ar ah kt rt pl at z

ng

sr

% 2.6

Zufahrt Parkhaus

%

e

En

TG

%

.80

9.0

H

be

608.72

tw

80 608.

% 1 .3

z kt er

et 1.5

60

60

a lt

5 Veloabstellplätze gedeckt

60

ss

46 8.

45

60

8.

60

hr

lä t llp ste ab lo Ve 32 TG AK

8.

60

hr ke

at pl

er nv

M

ar

ah nb Ei

im er sp ng itu be ar Be 11 9.

60

e ss

ra

st er

% 2 2.

ag

d

en

au

83

u ne ng zu la n pf en ud ta 9S 60

n se ra es Ki

M hr ke er nv ge Ge

rt

ste flä ep

eg

ph

nn

as W

a lz

Ri

vorbehalten.

Rechte Alle Inc. Solutions, Transoft 2019 (c)

%

4

0

1.6

9

0

6.8

ü

m in

TG

60

60

609.30 6

5.5

.69

60

u fb a

r be

Kandelaber neu

AK

609.01

8

5.2

0 6.2 0 60 6.4 60 0 6.6 60

Au

608.86

2.1

608.55

0

608.79

Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

60

tz

%

7.2

ne

ar

05

5

ktpla

60

Rechte vorbehalten.

M ar

7

60

0

5 8.9

1.2

60

Inc. Alle

öm 3.0 % str g Ab nun 608.68 ö ff

60

0

Solutions,

Solutions, Inc.

608.53

608.69

%

607.30

Be

9.3

9.2

Transoft

(c) 2019 Transoft

8

2.2 .78

7.4

>

Speier

607.60

15 %

60

60

%

8.9

6

9.

608.10

cm ) 608.57

10 %

B

5

608.91

60

eter

60

ca

0

60

.05

609.20

-5 8

8

9

09

40

0

>

0

60 9.6

66

he

/3

60

inn

öm str g Ab nun ö ff

608.72

5 8.8

.20

609.10

60

9.0

perim

1.80

Wiese

zh ö

16

4

Pflästerung

0

60

60

tungs

%

4x

9.5

8.9

8

0

60

tte

nr

0

60

ES best.

5 F Be us ge vo sgä gn u rtr n g n g itt e r s z sb u n on er d e ec Ve h t lo ig t

6

60

8.9

8.7

/3

11 %

ni

de

8.4

9.6

0

60

9.6

in

60

9.8

ste

6

60

60

0

1 .5

UKM 608.47

15

9.2

(Sit

607.76

2x

60

608.78

.1

60

0

60

nd

9.5

9.5

0

Fa

ssa

%

9.8

Bu

60

609.44 6 60 U K O 609 6 9.3 .47 09.5 09.45 26 K 3 09 .43 ge sc h

%

608.86

Chaussierung

6

(c) 2019

609.34

2

80

%

.1 09

ca

608.78

2.3

60

Kandelaber best.

60

1 .8

2.0

rbei

60

Asphalt neu

Kandelaber neu

608.72

1 .0

>

UKM S tütz 608.65 ma uer 608.75

608.72

2.

609.00

9 60

0

608.58

60

0

0

54

0

60 60 8.81 8.8 6

Pflästerung 1 9.1

7.7

1

608.47

4

609.50 OK 609.41

Anlieferung

Bea

Wildhecke neu

60

9.0

ES best.

3.8 %

608.67

Unterflurelektroschacht

8.6

0

9.8

80

8.8

3

%

60

609.4

60

4.

60

60

ke er 608.60 nv

ah nb

Ei

op

1 .8

ze

ge

D

6

%

Schlammsammler 3.

55 neu

ic h

7.8

7.2

%

60

60

608.60

608.

Mauer best.

Zaun/Absturzsicherung neu

60

p Ty in te rs de in

54

(B

in te

n

ds un

lb

se ra es

pe

Ki

t ck de

00

8.4

9

e

3 .5

%

Kandelaber best.

7.0

TG

60

ä tz

5m

Dorfbach

60

608.37

6.9

5

60

Unterflurelektroschacht

re

t.

60

TG

2.7

Kandelaber neu

be

es

607.89 Anlieferung

%

Hainbuche bestehend

0

0

9.6

9

609.2

60

9.3

00

g

eb

Pa rk p lä Be tze b e to n p Ra ste fl iff h e ast e is n d ers en te i ne

608.78

3.2

60

OK 9.2 UK 46 09 .14

4.

ck

AK

60

0

%

un

%

9.4

2

nz

2.4

2.

1%

%

60

7

lp l

fla

He

%

0

9.0

te l

np

Abströmöffnung 608.61

3.0

8 9.2 60 Kandelaber Abbruch

60

00

bs

de

2.2

7.

0

3.

TG

2%

9.3

lo a

au

8.

ha

43

lt

ei st nd

sp

Bu

za al W

) 10

AK

%

9.2

2m

0

Ve

608.72

4m

1 .6

60

9.1

.2

2

hr

Kultursäule mit integrierter Abströmöffung

609

60

2.

6 Hainbuche bestehend

Kandelaber best.

tz

40

2.

09

60

Fa

.89

8

7

p la

9.0

4.

11m

608.40

%

%

8.9

8.9

kt

Kultursäule mit integrierter Abströmöffung

1.3

60 60

.

7.1

60

2

ar

6

Kandelaber neu 60 8

Hainbuche bestehend

8.2

60

eu en nn

44

Ri

%

8.3

n

2

rM

20

Unterflurelektroschacht

in

Ri

nn

2.

e te

2

Po N a lle r tu rs te

Einlaufschacht 6 0

n

im

%

7

60

8 60

60

2.2

9

1 9.0

608.28

p

d un e lb pp

te

er

St 8.3

Do nit

Platane bestehend

M

Kandelaber Abbruch

Einlaufschacht

Schlammsammler neu

609.14

sp

1.2 %

608.91

Hainbuche bestehend

Container6 0 bestehend 9.03

ng

6 60

54

a

1

2.

itu

8.

en

ph

8.6 lt ges 0 ch

8.4

be

Ty in te de

se ra es Ki

hr

4 . b ere 00 ic h

(B

n

in

rs

Fa

60

As

60

608.40

6

60

ar

%

OK

608.98

8.9

0

.60 608

.80 608

60

en itt

u

sc

ne

ge

ng

t/

ku

ss

ec

pa

bd

ge

za

an

ol H

he

it m

er

er

au

au

M

m tz Si eu en

8.5

2 % Kandelaber ge sph sc alt neu hn itt en 8.

54

60

8.1

AK

608.64 2.

A

60

60

nn

60

eu

8

1 .3

608.19

Ri

%

8.8

8.9

94

hö

eu gn e la tb al ph As

0

60

60

6.

9

0

60

Be

608.15

4.2%

möglicher Standort 609.06 Briefkästen

3.

t.

608.30 608.32

608.10

hn

9

es

607

609.08

gb

606.40

Kandelaber best.

608.42

As 608.36 ge pha sc lt hn itt 2. en 1%

9.1

un

606.80

Infosäule Migros

te r

606.60

609

608

609.11

60

ru

608.16

609.12

in Zusammenarbeit mit/in cooperation with Schmid Landschaftsarchitekten

1m

ng

0

609.19

609.00

8.2

in

0

se

607.8

40

8m

lä s

ssr

607.6

60

ne

607.

607

0

0

609.16

20

8.3

Pf 8.2

6.8

607.

60

60

Magdenauerstrasse, Flawil seit/since 2017

216

ag de e ih na ig ue Sc ha rst le n ra ste in sse Ty p

a lt

Marktplatz Flawil Marketplace Flawil

Bu

608.30

6

1

60

5.3

5

157

292

Wohnen im ehemaligen Weinlager

293

r in 2e p1 Ty in nd

ste ph as a lz W

12

608.37

60

M

e ir dr

8 60

0 7.8 60

ng

sp

er

im

et

er

60

609.32

609.20

1 .7

M

60

ar

kt

pl

%

9.

at

60

40

z

609.14 9.2

9.1

1.7

5

0 7.6 60

40

0

60 Za

un

ne

u

607.

20

607.

9 60 60 9.2

9.4

9.0

.08 4

OK

Da

mm

60

5

9.4

0

sc ge

hn

itt

en

eH

eck

ud

en

pfla

nz

OK

60

8.8

im et5.40 er

80

60

.60

sper

605

605.

606.2

606.00

0

0 6.6

.40

60

606

607.

7.

00 6.8 0

20

Bea

rbei

607.40

607.60

607.80

0 1.8

un

Da

g

mm

60

9.1

0

Be

arb

eit

u

M OK

g un

sp

8

%

9 60

.0

5

605.20

erim

e te

rM

ark

OK

60

Da

60

m

m

8

6

.

08

ne

60

ne

60

607.87

607.76

5

8.7

0

0

8.2

7.5

7

607.80

e te rim

60

gs un eit

607.

60 607.

60

69

40

20

60

7

7.3

9

.90

8 60 UK mm Da OK 60 8.2 60 7 8.4 0 tz tpla

Treppe 608.20 int 60

607.20

60 8.2 8.2 5 3

60

60

60

8.3

60

4

8.3

9

60

8.3

6

53m

e

f up

en

ga

ss

e

7.3

2

7.0

41

0

7

605.

60

5

.84

60

5.7

605.80

Garten best.

60

6.5

ter Markt

platz

60

6.9

7

8

20

40

605.60

5.7

Garagen

60 5 60

.61

8 6.6 60 Kiesrasen

ngsperime

pe

45

607.

60

8 60 60 8.1 2

7

Bearbeitu

8.6

60

arb

mm

m

.57

2.0

0

OK

Da

m Da

607.60

8.0

5.2

Walzasphalt

Asphalt neu

607.66

60

5.3

neu

tz

60

UK

0

.40

Be

S ta

608.45

.5 08

71

5

607.06

607.47

ark

r

g nz pfla en

8.6

8 60

7.9

60

Pflanzfläche 606 60 5.8 neu 2

0

M

60

608.03

608.65

5 7.8

u

0 2.

608.19

tpla

mm Da OK

cm

ud

m

D

m

Rin

2

605.

.33

Treppe Ersatz

Speier

10

9

UK

am

0 .3

5.0

Zufahrt

% 0.2

0.

607.85

60

Mauer

608.10

607.

8.5

0

un

40

G 37m

608.00

608.20

608.40

% 3 2. %

2 2. ne r in en ad

S ta

tung

% 4.3

% 2 .7

60 8.

60

Fa

1

.80

%

60

hr ke

er nv

27

ah

8.

nb

60

Ei % ca

.0

.9

M Z u fa ar kt h rt pl at z

8.4

0 8.8 60

8.8

608

ke

60

äs tw En 0 8.2 60

8. ) 10

34

8.

60

äs

d.

608.45

m Da

.6 08

0

ec

itu

Rinne ne

60

8.

P 50 N o lle at r, ur st ei n

60

60

ne in ru se

M Zuf ar ah kt rt pl at z

ng

sr

% 2.6

Zufahrt Parkhaus

%

e

En

TG

%

.80

9.0

H

be

608.72

tw

80 608.

% 1 .3

z kt er

et 1.5

60

60

a lt

5 Veloabstellplätze gedeckt

60

ss

46 8.

45

60

8.

60

hr

lä t llp ste ab lo Ve 32 TG AK

8.

60

hr ke

at pl

er nv

M

ar

ah nb Ei

im er sp ng itu be ar Be 11 9.

60

e ss

ra

st er

% 2 2.

ag

d

en

au

83

u ne ng zu la n pf en ud ta 9S 60

n se ra es Ki

M hr ke er nv ge Ge

rt

ste flä ep

eg

ph

nn

as W

a lz

Ri

vorbehalten.

Rechte Alle Inc. Solutions, Transoft 2019 (c)

%

4

0

1.6

9

0

6.8

ü

m in

TG

60

60

609.30 6

5.5

.69

60

u fb a

r be

Kandelaber neu

AK

609.01

8

5.2

0 6.2 0 60 6.4 60 0 6.6 60

Au

608.86

2.1

608.55

0

608.79

Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

60

tz

%

7.2

ne

ar

05

5

ktpla

60

Rechte vorbehalten.

M ar

7

60

0

5 8.9

1.2

60

Inc. Alle

öm 3.0 % str g Ab nun 608.68 ö ff

60

0

Solutions,

Solutions, Inc.

608.53

608.69

%

607.30

Be

9.3

9.2

Transoft

(c) 2019 Transoft

8

2.2 .78

7.4

>

Speier

607.60

15 %

60

60

%

8.9

6

9.

608.10

cm ) 608.57

10 %

B

5

608.91

60

eter

60

ca

0

60

.05

609.20

-5 8

8

9

09

40

0

>

0

60 9.6

66

he

/3

60

inn

öm str g Ab nun ö ff

608.72

5 8.8

.20

609.10

60

9.0

perim

1.80

Wiese

zh ö

16

4

Pflästerung

0

60

60

tungs

%

4x

9.5

8.9

8

0

60

tte

nr

0

60

ES best.

5 F Be us ge vo sgä gn u rtr n g n g itt e r s z sb u n on er d e ec Ve h t lo ig t

6

60

8.9

8.7

/3

11 %

ni

de

8.4

9.6

0

60

9.6

in

60

9.8

ste

6

60

60

0

1 .5

UKM 608.47

15

9.2

(Sit

607.76

2x

60

608.78

.1

60

0

60

nd

9.5

9.5

0

Fa

ssa

%

9.8

Bu

60

609.44 6 60 U K O 609 6 9.3 .47 09.5 09.45 26 K 3 09 .43 ge sc h

%

608.86

Chaussierung

6

(c) 2019

609.34

2

80

%

.1 09

ca

608.78

2.3

60

Kandelaber best.

60

1 .8

2.0

rbei

60

Asphalt neu

Kandelaber neu

608.72

1 .0

>

UKM S tütz 608.65 ma uer 608.75

608.72

2.

609.00

9 60

0

608.58

60

0

0

54

0

60 60 8.81 8.8 6

Pflästerung 1 9.1

7.7

1

608.47

4

609.50 OK 609.41

Anlieferung

Bea

Wildhecke neu

60

9.0

ES best.

3.8 %

608.67

Unterflurelektroschacht

8.6

0

9.8

80

8.8

3

%

60

609.4

60

4.

60

60

ke er 608.60 nv

ah nb

Ei

op

1 .8

ze

ge

D

6

%

Schlammsammler 3.

55 neu

ic h

7.8

7.2

%

60

60

608.60

608.

Mauer best.

Zaun/Absturzsicherung neu

60

p Ty in te rs de in

54

(B

in te

n

ds un

lb

se ra es

pe

Ki

t ck de

00

8.4

9

e

3 .5

%

Kandelaber best.

7.0

TG

60

ä tz

5m

Dorfbach

60

608.37

6.9

5

60

Unterflurelektroschacht

re

t.

60

TG

2.7

Kandelaber neu

be

es

607.89 Anlieferung

%

Hainbuche bestehend

0

0

9.6

9

609.2

60

9.3

00

g

eb

Pa rk p lä Be tze b e to n p Ra ste fl iff h e ast e is n d ers en te i ne

608.78

3.2

60

OK 9.2 UK 46 09 .14

4.

ck

AK

60

0

%

un

%

9.4

2

nz

2.4

2.

1%

%

60

7

lp l

fla

He

%

0

9.0

te l

np

Abströmöffnung 608.61

3.0

8 9.2 60 Kandelaber Abbruch

60

00

bs

de

2.2

7.

0

3.

TG

2%

9.3

lo a

au

8.

ha

43

lt

ei st nd

sp

Bu

za al W

) 10

AK

%

9.2

2m

0

Ve

608.72

4m

1 .6

60

9.1

.2

2

hr

Kultursäule mit integrierter Abströmöffung

609

60

2.

6 Hainbuche bestehend

Kandelaber best.

tz

40

2.

09

60

Fa

.89

8

7

p la

9.0

4.

11m

608.40

%

%

8.9

8.9

kt

Kultursäule mit integrierter Abströmöffung

1.3

60 60

.

7.1

60

2

ar

6

Kandelaber neu 60 8

Hainbuche bestehend

8.2

60

eu en nn

44

Ri

%

8.3

n

2

rM

20

Unterflurelektroschacht

in

Ri

nn

2.

e te

2

Po N a lle r tu rs te

Einlaufschacht 6 0

n

im

%

7

60

8 60

60

2.2

9

1 9.0

608.28

p

d un e lb pp

te

er

St 8.3

Do nit

Platane bestehend

M

Kandelaber Abbruch

Einlaufschacht

Schlammsammler neu

609.14

sp

1.2 %

608.91

Hainbuche bestehend

Container6 0 bestehend 9.03

ng

6 60

54

a

1

2.

itu

8.

en

ph

8.6 lt ges 0 ch

8.4

be

Ty in te de

se ra es Ki

hr

4 . b ere 00 ic h

(B

n

in

rs

Fa

60

As

60

608.40

6

60

ar

%

OK

608.98

8.9

0

.60 608

.80 608

60

en itt

u

sc

ne

ge

ng

t/

ku

ss

ec

pa

bd

ge

za

an

ol H

he

it m

er

er

au

au

M

m tz Si eu en

8.5

2 % Kandelaber ge sph sc alt neu hn itt en 8.

54

60

8.1

AK

608.64 2.

A

60

60

nn

60

eu

8

1 .3

608.19

Ri

%

8.8

8.9

94

hö

eu gn e la tb al ph As

0

60

60

6.

9

0

60

Be

608.15

4.2%

möglicher Standort 609.06 Briefkästen

3.

t.

608.30 608.32

608.10

hn

9

es

607

609.08

gb

606.40

Kandelaber best.

608.42

As 608.36 ge pha sc lt hn itt 2. en 1%

9.1

un

606.80

Infosäule Migros

te r

606.60

609

608

609.11

60

ru

608.16

609.12

in Zusammenarbeit mit/in cooperation with Schmid Landschaftsarchitekten

1m

ng

0

609.19

609.00

8.2

in

0

se

607.8

40

8m

lä s

ssr

607.6

60

ne

607.

607

0

0

609.16

20

8.3

Pf 8.2

6.8

607.

60

60

Magdenauerstrasse, Flawil seit/since 2017

216

ag de e ih na ig ue Sc ha rst le n ra ste in sse Ty p

a lt

Marktplatz Flawil Marketplace Flawil

Bu

608.30

6

1

60

5.3

5

360

292

Wohnen im ehemaligen Weinlager

293

Querschnitt Areal

Ausfahrt Einstellhalle Einfahrt Einstellhalle

Hauseingang Hauseingang

Gewerbe 55.5

6 VPP 10.0

Z 15.0

409.00

409.00 Z 11.0

Z 17.0 V 4.0

B 4.0

D 2.5

6 VPP 10.0

Z 17.0 V 3.5

E 10.5

B 4.5

Z 17.0

D 2.5

E 3.5

B 4.5

B 4.5

W 23.5

2.5 Zi. Wo. 64.0 m2

Hauseingang 408.00

B 7.0

E 10.5

2.0 Zi. Wo. 58.5 m2

B 4.0

Hauseingang 408.35

26 VPP 25.0

K 9.0

3.5 Zi. Wo. 90.5 m2

3.5 Zi. Wo. 90.5 m2

S 9.0

E/K 7.0

S 7.0

E/K 18.0

2.0 Zi. Wo. 58.5 m2

Z 13.0

B 4.0

409.40

Hauseingang

E/T 8.5

B 10.0

28 VPP 26.0

B 3.0

Gewerbe 47.5

Ausgang Hof / Velo

3.5 Zi. Wo. 88.0 m2

S 10.0

R 3.5

S 7.5

2.0 Zi. Wo. 58.0 m2

5.5 Zi. Ms. 125.0 m2

410.00

B 4.0

5.5 Zi. Ms. 125.0 m2

E/T 8.5

W/E 29.5

B 10.0

B 10.0

Hauseingang

409.40

409.40

E/T 8.5

B 3.0

Gewerbe 47.5

Gewerbe 47.5

B 3.0

410.00

409.40

Ausgang Hof / Velo Z 13.0

B 10.0

6.5 Zi. Ms. 139.0 m2

B 4.0

5.5 Zi. Ms. 125.0 m2 W/E 29.5

6.5 Zi. Ms. 139.0 m 2

W/E 29.0

E/T 9.0

Wohnatelier 46.0

B 4.0 B 10.0

B 10.0

Hauseingang

410.00

W/E 29.5

E/T 8.5

408.85 B 4.5

K 6.0

Schieberampe 15% Velostation UG

Schieberampe 15% Velostation UG

Wohnatelier 46.0

Schieberamp Velostation e 15% UG

Velostation UG

Velostation UG

B 4.5

B 4.0

5.5 Zi. Ms. 125.0 m 2

K 6.0

K 6.0

1.5 Zi. Wo. 50.5 m 2

28 VPP 21.0

K 6.0 B 10.0

B 4.0

K 6.0

Schieberampe 15% Velostation UG

408.85 Wohnatelier 49.0

Obergescho ss Maisonette siehe Plan 4

W/E 29.0

E/T 9.0

B 4.0

Hauseingang

Hauseingang

W 21.5

Ausgang Hof

Obergeschoss Maisonette siehe Plan 4

Z 13.0

B 3.0

Gewerbe 47.5

B 3.0

B 4.0

B 7.5

3.0 Zi. Wo. 79.0 m2

1.5 Zi. Wo. 53.0 m 2

28 VPP 21.0

E/T 9.0

W/E 29.0

W/E/K 41.0

Z 13.5

409.50

Ausgang Hof

Ausgang Hof / Velo

Gewerbe 47.5

B 4.5

E/K 20.0

W/E/K 33.0

Z 15.5

Ausgang Hof

28 VPP 21.0

E 5.5 E 3.0

K 8.5

3.5 Zi. Wo. 88.0 m2

1.5 Zi. Wo. 61.5 m2

Ausgang Hof / Velo

B 4.0

E 6.0

26 VPP 21.0 W 31.0

S 10.0

R 3.0

S 7.5

Wohnatelier 53.0

Z 13.0

Z 14.5 B 4.5

409.50

K 6.0

6.5 Zi. Ms. 139.0 m2

6.5 Zi. Ms. 139.0 m2

W/E 29.5

E 5.0 D 5.0

Tiefgarage

B 10.0

B 4.0

409.30

408.35

E 10.5

V 3.5

409.25

2.0 Zi. Wo. 58.0 m2

R 4.5

R 5.0

Mobilitätssta tion 36 VPP 39.0

W/E/K 26.5

W 31.0

K 8.5

B 6.0

Z 14.0

Z 10.5

D 2.5

K/E/W 35.0

B 4.0

Hauseingang

Hauseingang

1.5 Zi. Wo. 59.5 m2

Tiefgarage

B 4.0

B 4.5

B 7.5

408.25

Ausgang Hof 409.00

Obergeschoss Maisonette siehe Plan 4

W/E 29.0

Z 16.0

B 4.5

K 6.0

E/T 9.0

B 4.5

D 2.5

E 3.5

S 10.5 Wohnatelier 50.5

409.40 W 23.5

3.0 Zi. Wo. 79.5 m2 79.0

K 6.0

B 3.0

Gewerbe 47.5

V 3.5

E 10.5

Z 14.5

B 4.0

1.5 Zi. Wo. 47.5 m2

Obergeschoss Maisonette siehe Plan 4

Z 16.5

Z 11.0 B 4.5

2.5 Zi. Wo. 63.5 m 2

Hauseingang

6 VPP 10.0

409.40

B 7.5

Z 15.0

409.00

R 3.0

Wohnatelier 43.5

28 VPP 21.0

V 3.5

E 10.5

K/E/W 38.5

16 VPP 13.0

Ausgang Hof 409.00

Ausgang Hof / Velo

Z 16.5

Z 11.0

Z 11.0

E 2.5

B 4.5

E 7.0

W/E/K 33.5

Z 15.5

Ausgang Hof 409.00

Ausgang Hof / Velo

409.50

409.50

B 4.0

E 7.0

D 4.0

1.5 Zi. Wo. 37.0 m 2

Hauseingang

W/E/Z 24.5

W/E/K 37.5

W 32.0

S 9.0

R 3.0

S 7.0

W/E/K/S 28.0

Z 16.0

W 32.0

K/E 11.5 S 8.0

Paketbox 38.0

18 VPP 51.5

Z 15.5

E 5.5 D 4.5 409.00

K 9.0

409.50

D 2.5

D 2.5

W/E/K 39.0

Hauseingang

6 VPP 10.0

B 7.0

Z 11.0

V 3.5

4.5 Zi. Wo. 98.0 m2

1.5 Zi. Wo. 35.5 m2

Paketbox

6 Spezial-VPP

Z 11.0

Z 11.0 E 11.0

Mobilitätsstation Spezialvelos

1.5 Zi. Wo. 39.0 m2

409.00

Mobilitätss Spezialveltation os

4.5 Zi. Wo. 99.5 m2

Velostation UG

1.5 Zi. Wo. 50.5 m 2

Velostation UG

Längsschnitt Areal

Einstellhalle

Längsschn

itt Areal

1.5 Zi. Wo. 59.5 m2

Hauseingang Hauseingang

Ausgang Hof / Velo

Z 17.0

V 11.0

B 5.0 D 4.5

E 5.5

Z 12.5

B 4.0

Z 14.5

E 10.5

B 4.0

B 4.5

Z 15.5 V 4.0

E 8.0

V 3.5

E 10.5

4.5 Zi. Wo. 107.5 m2

R 3.0

S 9.0

3.5 Zi. Wo. 90.0 m2

3.5 Zi. Wo. 90.0 m2

Z 13.5

W 32.0

R 3.0

R 1.5

R 3.0

E 7.0

B 4.0

E 7.5

KiGa

R 3.0

Z 14.0

W 30.5

K 9.0 S 9.0

R 1.5

G 14.5

V 4.0

2.0 Zi. Wo. 73.0 m2

409.40

W 3.5 E 11.0

GAR 27.0

4.5 Zi. Wo. 95.0 m2

W/E/K/Z 38.5

B 10.5

1.5 Zi. Wo. 52.5 m2

B 7.0

1.5 Zi. Wo. 47.5 m2 Querschnitt Areal

Hauptraum 67.0

W 5.0

2.5 Zi. Wo. 73.5 m2

B 9.5

2.5 Zi. Wo. 66.5 m2

K 12.0

B 4.0

B 4.5

Hauseingang

B 4.5

Z 16.5

WC 2.0

E 8.0

V 3.5

408.85

410.00

K 8.0

W 32.0

S 9.5

Pergola

20 VPP 21.0

Z 16.0 V 4.0

E 8.5

D 2.5

R 1.5

R 3.0

S 9.5

3.5 Zi. Wo. 86.5 m2

S 9.5

3.5 Zi. Wo. 87.0 m2

W 32.0

K 8.0

W 32.5

K 8.0

W 31.5

E 9.0

D 2.5

E 8.5

Aufenthalt 37.5

V 10.0

E/K 37.5

Hauptraum 68.0

Pergola

W 5.0

Z 11.0

V 3.5 D 2.5

B 4.0

WC 2.0

DoppelKiGa 285.0 m2

S 9.5 S 9.5

V 3.5

E 9.0

B 4.0

Z 16.5

K 8.0

K 9.0

W 32.0

K 9.0

S 9.5

B 4.0

Lager 8.5

410.00

409.40

409.40

G 14.5

D 2.5

B 4.0

Z 16.5

Z 11.0

Kiwa 17.0

Kiwa 16.5

Z 11.0

B 4.0 W 32.0

S 10.5

5.5 Zi. Wo. 123.5 m2 E/K 33.0

409.40

WC 2.0

Z 12.5

W 30.5

W/E/K 48.0

E 7.5

R 3.0

V 3.5 D 2.5

B 4.5

D 2.5

E 8.0

K 9.0

W 7.5

B 4.5

Z 17.0

Z 11.0

WC 2.0

B 5.0

V 5.0

Z 17.0 V 3.5

E 10.5

Z 15.0

Z 14.0

Z 14.0

Kiwa 15.5

Gewerbe 65.0

Hauseingang

409.40

Wohnatelier 48.5

Ausgang Hof / Velo

6 VPP 10.0

Ausgang Hof / Velo

54 VPP 41.0

Z 15.5

Z 11.0

B 4.0

Hauseingang

R 3.5

6 VPP 10.0

W/E/K/Z 23.5

410.00

B 4.0

409.50

Z 14.5

E 2.5

R 3.5

52 VPP 38.5

6 VPP 10.0

410.00

6 VPP 10.0

409.50

1.5 Zi. Wo. 30.0 m2

B 4.0

408.35

Ausgang Hof / Velo

1.5 Zi. Wo. 53.0 m 2

410.00 Hauseingang

Wohnatelier 52.0

Wohnatelier 47.5

42 VPP 34.0

1.5 Zi. Wo. 59.5 m2

Wohnatelier 52.0

Einstellhalle

1.5 Zi. Wo. 51.5 m2

Hauseingang

Hauseingang

R 3.0

R 1.5

2.5 Zi. Wo. 75.0 m2

14 VPP 12.5

E 4.5 B 4.0

S 9.5

Z 17.5

W/E/K 23.0

E 5.0 B 4.0

W/E/K 27.5

S 9.5

W/E/K 29.5

3.0 Zi. Wo. 75.5 m2 B 7.0

1.5 Zi. Wo. 36.5 m2

B 6.0

1.5 Zi. Wo. 39.0 m2

360

Querschnitt Areal

Ausfahrt Einstellhalle Einfahrt Einstellhalle

Hauseingang Hauseingang

Gewerbe 55.5

6 VPP 10.0

Z 15.0

409.00

409.00 Z 11.0

Z 17.0 V 4.0

B 4.0

D 2.5

6 VPP 10.0

Z 17.0 V 3.5

E 10.5

B 4.5

Z 17.0

D 2.5

E 3.5

B 4.5

B 4.5

W 23.5

2.5 Zi. Wo. 64.0 m2

Hauseingang 408.00

B 7.0

E 10.5

2.0 Zi. Wo. 58.5 m2

B 4.0

Hauseingang 408.35

26 VPP 25.0

K 9.0

3.5 Zi. Wo. 90.5 m2

3.5 Zi. Wo. 90.5 m2

S 9.0

E/K 7.0

S 7.0

E/K 18.0

2.0 Zi. Wo. 58.5 m2

Z 13.0

B 4.0

409.40

Hauseingang

E/T 8.5

B 10.0

28 VPP 26.0

B 3.0

Gewerbe 47.5

Ausgang Hof / Velo

3.5 Zi. Wo. 88.0 m2

S 10.0

R 3.5

S 7.5

2.0 Zi. Wo. 58.0 m2

5.5 Zi. Ms. 125.0 m2

410.00

B 4.0

5.5 Zi. Ms. 125.0 m2

E/T 8.5

W/E 29.5

B 10.0

B 10.0

Hauseingang

409.40

409.40

E/T 8.5

B 3.0

Gewerbe 47.5

Gewerbe 47.5

B 3.0

410.00

409.40

Ausgang Hof / Velo Z 13.0

B 10.0

6.5 Zi. Ms. 139.0 m2

B 4.0

5.5 Zi. Ms. 125.0 m2 W/E 29.5

6.5 Zi. Ms. 139.0 m 2

W/E 29.0

E/T 9.0

Wohnatelier 46.0

B 4.0 B 10.0

B 10.0

Hauseingang

410.00

W/E 29.5

E/T 8.5

408.85 B 4.5

K 6.0

Schieberampe 15% Velostation UG

Schieberampe 15% Velostation UG

Wohnatelier 46.0

Schieberamp Velostation e 15% UG

Velostation UG

Velostation UG

B 4.5

B 4.0

5.5 Zi. Ms. 125.0 m 2

K 6.0

K 6.0

1.5 Zi. Wo. 50.5 m 2

28 VPP 21.0

K 6.0 B 10.0

B 4.0

K 6.0

Schieberampe 15% Velostation UG

408.85 Wohnatelier 49.0

Obergescho ss Maisonette siehe Plan 4

W/E 29.0

E/T 9.0

B 4.0

Hauseingang

Hauseingang

W 21.5

Ausgang Hof

Obergeschoss Maisonette siehe Plan 4

Z 13.0

B 3.0

Gewerbe 47.5

B 3.0

B 4.0

B 7.5

3.0 Zi. Wo. 79.0 m2

1.5 Zi. Wo. 53.0 m 2

28 VPP 21.0

E/T 9.0

W/E 29.0

W/E/K 41.0

Z 13.5

409.50

Ausgang Hof

Ausgang Hof / Velo

Gewerbe 47.5

B 4.5

E/K 20.0

W/E/K 33.0

Z 15.5

Ausgang Hof

28 VPP 21.0

E 5.5 E 3.0

K 8.5

3.5 Zi. Wo. 88.0 m2

1.5 Zi. Wo. 61.5 m2

Ausgang Hof / Velo

B 4.0

E 6.0

26 VPP 21.0 W 31.0

S 10.0

R 3.0

S 7.5

Wohnatelier 53.0

Z 13.0

Z 14.5 B 4.5

409.50

K 6.0

6.5 Zi. Ms. 139.0 m2

6.5 Zi. Ms. 139.0 m2

W/E 29.5

E 5.0 D 5.0

Tiefgarage

B 10.0

B 4.0

409.30

408.35

E 10.5

V 3.5

409.25

2.0 Zi. Wo. 58.0 m2

R 4.5

R 5.0

Mobilitätssta tion 36 VPP 39.0

W/E/K 26.5

W 31.0

K 8.5

B 6.0

Z 14.0

Z 10.5

D 2.5

K/E/W 35.0

B 4.0

Hauseingang

Hauseingang

1.5 Zi. Wo. 59.5 m2

Tiefgarage

B 4.0

B 4.5

B 7.5

408.25

Ausgang Hof 409.00

Obergeschoss Maisonette siehe Plan 4

W/E 29.0

Z 16.0

B 4.5

K 6.0

E/T 9.0

B 4.5

D 2.5

E 3.5

S 10.5 Wohnatelier 50.5

409.40 W 23.5

3.0 Zi. Wo. 79.5 m2 79.0

K 6.0

B 3.0

Gewerbe 47.5

V 3.5

E 10.5

Z 14.5

B 4.0

1.5 Zi. Wo. 47.5 m2

Obergeschoss Maisonette siehe Plan 4

Z 16.5

Z 11.0 B 4.5

2.5 Zi. Wo. 63.5 m 2

Hauseingang

6 VPP 10.0

409.40

B 7.5

Z 15.0

409.00

R 3.0

Wohnatelier 43.5

28 VPP 21.0

V 3.5

E 10.5

K/E/W 38.5

16 VPP 13.0

Ausgang Hof 409.00

Ausgang Hof / Velo

Z 16.5

Z 11.0

Z 11.0

E 2.5

B 4.5

E 7.0

W/E/K 33.5

Z 15.5

Ausgang Hof 409.00

Ausgang Hof / Velo

409.50

409.50

B 4.0

E 7.0

D 4.0

1.5 Zi. Wo. 37.0 m 2

Hauseingang

W/E/Z 24.5

W/E/K 37.5

W 32.0

S 9.0

R 3.0

S 7.0

W/E/K/S 28.0

Z 16.0

W 32.0

K/E 11.5 S 8.0

Paketbox 38.0

18 VPP 51.5

Z 15.5

E 5.5 D 4.5 409.00

K 9.0

409.50

D 2.5

D 2.5

W/E/K 39.0

Hauseingang

6 VPP 10.0

B 7.0

Z 11.0

V 3.5

4.5 Zi. Wo. 98.0 m2

1.5 Zi. Wo. 35.5 m2

Paketbox

6 Spezial-VPP

Z 11.0

Z 11.0 E 11.0

Mobilitätsstation Spezialvelos

1.5 Zi. Wo. 39.0 m2

409.00

Mobilitätss Spezialveltation os

4.5 Zi. Wo. 99.5 m2

Velostation UG

1.5 Zi. Wo. 50.5 m 2

Velostation UG

Längsschnitt Areal

Einstellhalle

Längsschn

itt Areal

1.5 Zi. Wo. 59.5 m2

Hauseingang Hauseingang

Ausgang Hof / Velo

Z 17.0

V 11.0

B 5.0 D 4.5

E 5.5

Z 12.5

B 4.0

Z 14.5

E 10.5

B 4.0

B 4.5

Z 15.5 V 4.0

E 8.0

V 3.5

E 10.5

4.5 Zi. Wo. 107.5 m2

R 3.0

S 9.0

3.5 Zi. Wo. 90.0 m2

3.5 Zi. Wo. 90.0 m2

Z 13.5

W 32.0

R 3.0

R 1.5

R 3.0

E 7.0

B 4.0

E 7.5

KiGa

R 3.0

Z 14.0

W 30.5

K 9.0 S 9.0

R 1.5

G 14.5

V 4.0

2.0 Zi. Wo. 73.0 m2

409.40

W 3.5 E 11.0

GAR 27.0

4.5 Zi. Wo. 95.0 m2

W/E/K/Z 38.5

B 10.5

1.5 Zi. Wo. 52.5 m2

B 7.0

1.5 Zi. Wo. 47.5 m2 Querschnitt Areal

Hauptraum 67.0

W 5.0

2.5 Zi. Wo. 73.5 m2

B 9.5

2.5 Zi. Wo. 66.5 m2

K 12.0

B 4.0

B 4.5

Hauseingang

B 4.5

Z 16.5

WC 2.0

E 8.0

V 3.5

408.85

410.00

K 8.0

W 32.0

S 9.5

Pergola

20 VPP 21.0

Z 16.0 V 4.0

E 8.5

D 2.5

R 1.5

R 3.0

S 9.5

3.5 Zi. Wo. 86.5 m2

S 9.5

3.5 Zi. Wo. 87.0 m2

W 32.0

K 8.0

W 32.5

K 8.0

W 31.5

E 9.0

D 2.5

E 8.5

Aufenthalt 37.5

V 10.0

E/K 37.5

Hauptraum 68.0

Pergola

W 5.0

Z 11.0

V 3.5 D 2.5

B 4.0

WC 2.0

DoppelKiGa 285.0 m2

S 9.5 S 9.5

V 3.5

E 9.0

B 4.0

Z 16.5

K 8.0

K 9.0

W 32.0

K 9.0

S 9.5

B 4.0

Lager 8.5

410.00

409.40

409.40

G 14.5

D 2.5

B 4.0

Z 16.5

Z 11.0

Kiwa 17.0

Kiwa 16.5

Z 11.0

B 4.0 W 32.0

S 10.5

5.5 Zi. Wo. 123.5 m2 E/K 33.0

409.40

WC 2.0

Z 12.5

W 30.5

W/E/K 48.0

E 7.5

R 3.0

V 3.5 D 2.5

B 4.5

D 2.5

E 8.0

K 9.0

W 7.5

B 4.5

Z 17.0

Z 11.0

WC 2.0

B 5.0

V 5.0

Z 17.0 V 3.5

E 10.5

Z 15.0

Z 14.0

Z 14.0

Kiwa 15.5

Gewerbe 65.0

Hauseingang

409.40

Wohnatelier 48.5

Ausgang Hof / Velo

6 VPP 10.0

Ausgang Hof / Velo

54 VPP 41.0

Z 15.5

Z 11.0

B 4.0

Hauseingang

R 3.5

6 VPP 10.0

W/E/K/Z 23.5

410.00

B 4.0

409.50

Z 14.5

E 2.5

R 3.5

52 VPP 38.5

6 VPP 10.0

410.00

6 VPP 10.0

409.50

1.5 Zi. Wo. 30.0 m2

B 4.0

408.35

Ausgang Hof / Velo

1.5 Zi. Wo. 53.0 m 2

410.00 Hauseingang

Wohnatelier 52.0

Wohnatelier 47.5

42 VPP 34.0

1.5 Zi. Wo. 59.5 m2

Wohnatelier 52.0

Einstellhalle

1.5 Zi. Wo. 51.5 m2

Hauseingang

Hauseingang

R 3.0

R 1.5

2.5 Zi. Wo. 75.0 m2

14 VPP 12.5

E 4.5 B 4.0

S 9.5

Z 17.5

W/E/K 23.0

E 5.0 B 4.0

W/E/K 27.5

S 9.5

W/E/K 29.5

3.0 Zi. Wo. 75.5 m2 B 7.0

1.5 Zi. Wo. 36.5 m2

B 6.0

1.5 Zi. Wo. 39.0 m2

IMPRESSUM / IMPRINT Esch Sintzel Architekten Bauten und Projekte / Buildings and Projects Herausgeber /Editor: Martin Tschanz Projekttexte /Project texts: Esch Sintzel Architekten, Martin Tschanz Fotoessay /Photo essay: Paola Corsini Lektorat /Copyediting: Maike Kleihauer, Olivia Baeriswyl Übersetzung / Translations: Thomas Skelton-Robinson Grafik /Graphic design: Schön & Berger Bildbearbeitung/Lithography: Schön & Berger Korrektorat / Proofreading: Kirsten Thietz, Colette Forder Druck und Bindung / Printing and binding: DZA Druckerei zu Altenburg, Thüringen Esch Sintzel Architekten: Philipp Esch, Stephan Sintzel, Marco Rickenbacher Projektleitung /Project lead: Nelly Jana Pläne /Drawings: Gian Brechbühl, Frida Grönberg, Nelly Jana, Lukas Kistler, Dominik Rinderknecht, Simon Rott, Lotta Theuerkauf © 2025 Esch Sintzel Architekten und /and Park Books AG, Zürich © für die Texte / for the texts: die Autorinnen und Autoren / the authors © für die Fotografien / for the photographs: siehe Bildnachweis /see Image credits Park Books Niederdorfstrasse 54 8001 Zürich Schweiz /Switzerland www.park-books.com Park Books wird vom Bundesamt für Kultur mit einem Strukturbeitrag für die Jahre 2021–2025 unterstützt. /Park Books is being supported by the Federal Office of ­Culture with a general subsidy for the years 2021–2025.

Alle Rechte vorbehalten; kein Teil dieses Werks darf in irgendeiner Form ohne vorherige schriftliche Genehmigung des Verlags reproduziert oder unter Verwendung elektronischer Systeme verarbeitet, vervielfältigt oder verbreitet werden. / All rights reserved; no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo­ copying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written consent of the publisher.

ISBN 978-3-03860-391-7