HRM 701: TASK PERFORMANCE_ Is the teaching of Rizal’s Life and Works course realistic given the dang

downloaded from

Scholarfriends

https://scholarfriends.com Downloaded by: writerforacademic@gmail.com | https://scholarfriends.com/singlePaper/273119/hrm-701-task-performance-is-the-teaching-ofrizals-life-and-works-course-realistic-given-the-da Distribution of this document is illegal.

TASK PERFORMANCE DE JESUS, Giscel B. BSHRM 701 A. Is the teaching of Rizal’s Life and Works course realistic given the dangers and sensitivities of literature as a means of communication in learning nationalism, patriotism, and volunteerism?

The teaching of Jose Rizal’s life, works, and writings is mandated by Republic Act 1425, otherwise known as the Rizal Law. Senator Jose &. Laurel, the person who sponsored the said law, said that since Rizal was the founder of Philippine nationalism and has contributed much to the current standing of this nation, it is only right that the youth as well as all the people in the country know about and learn to imbibe the great ideals for which he died.

Nationalism involves the desire to attain freedom and political independence, especially by a country under foreign lower, while patriotism denotes proud devotion and loyalty to one’s nation. Jose Rizal’s life, works, and writings especially his novels essentially, if not perfectly, radiate these traits or one thing, the subject helps us to understand our country better. He can learn much from the way Rizal faced various challenges in life. Is a controversial figure in his time, he encountered serious dilemmas and predicaments but responded decently and high mindedly.

Through the crucial decisions he made in his life, we can sense his priorities and convictions which manifest how noble, selfless, and great the national hero was. For example, his many resolutions exemplified the aphorism that in this life there are things more important than personal feeling and happiness.

B. How important are literary criticism in the study of Rizal’s Life and Works?

The academic subject on the life, works, and writings of Jose Rizal was not mandated by law for nothing. Far from being I’m practical, the course interesting offers many benefits that some contemporary academicians declare that the subject, especially when taught properly, is more beneficial than many subjects in various curricula. Jose Rizal course, as a history subject, is full of historical information from which one could base his decisions in life.

In various ways, the subject, for instance, teaches that being educated is a vital ingredient for a person or country to be really free and successful. The past helps us understand who we are. We comprehensively define ourselves not only in terms of where we are going, but also where we come from. Our heredity, past behaviors, and old habits as a nation are all significant clues and determinants to our present situation. Interestingly, the life of a very important national historical figure like Jose Rizal contributes much to shedding light on our collective experience and identity as Filipino.

Rizal also tried his hand at painting and sculpture. His most famous sculptural work was "The Triumph of Science over Death", a clay sculpture of a naked young woman with overflowing hair, standing on a skull while bearing a torch held high. The woman symbolized the ignorance of humankind during the Dark Ages, while the torch she bore symbolized the enlightenment science brings over the whole world. He sent the sculpture as a gift to his dear friend Ferdinand Blumentritt, together with another one named "The Triumph of Death over Life". The woman is shown trampling the skull, a symbol of death, to signify the victory the humankind achieved by conquering the bane of death through their scientific advancements.

Critical Thinking refers to discerning, evaluative, and analytical thinking. A philosophy major, Jose Rizal unsurprisingly demonstrated his critical thinking skills in his argumentative essays, satires, novels, speeches, and written debates. In deciding what to believe or do, Rizal also !roved his being a reasonably reflective thinker, never succumbing to the irrational whims and baseless opinions of anyone. In fact, he indiscriminately evaluated and criticized even the doctrines of the dominant religion of his time. A course on Rizal’s life, works, and writings therefore is also a lesson in critical thinking..

C. If given a chance to deconstruct one of Rizal’s written works (both well-known and obscure), what would it be and what is its relation to the analysis and understanding of nation-building?

The role of the intellectual in nation-building, focusing specifically on some of the issues that today confront us as a nation. It almost sounds like an invitation to bare the ivory-tower arrogance of which academics like us have often been accused. The highly charged word in the title, of course, is “intellectual.” Indeed, who among us will dare claim this appellation? We may be writers, opinionmakers, pundits, political analysts, or academics whose views on a broad range of questions are routinely sought by the mass media. But, that would not entitle us to the title, even in its more recent incarnation as “public intellectual.”.

I cringe when I’m sometimes introduced as a “public intellectual.” I have encountered many forms of conceit in my life, but I have yet to meet anybody who carries a calling card with the profession: “public intellectual.” The concept “intellectual” is highly abused enough as it is; one can only imagine what complex work it is expected to do when paired with the equally contested term “public.” Assuming we can agree on what it means, do academics like us have a duty to play the role of public intellectual in nation-building? If so, what expectations accompany the performance of this role? If the concept were meant just to refer to someone who relies on her intellect more than on her instincts and emotions, it might suffice to use the word “thinker.” A “thinker” would be someone who spends her time creating, examining, or sorting out ideas, rather than fabricating things. But this generic word would cast such a huge net that it would surely fail to distinguish the kind of work we tacitly expect of intellectuals.

The public intellectual typically establishes a presence in the modern mass media – something that is not so difficult to do now because of the Internet. Unlike the quiet academic who spends a lifetime to get published in refereed journals, the public intellectual would be more keen to acquire a foothold in the public consciousness.