Newsletter AMERICAN ASSOCIATION
OF
PHYSICISTS
IN
VOLUM E 24 NO. 2
MEDICINE MARCH/APRIL 1999
AAPM President’s Column The AAPM as a National Influence By Geoffrey Ibbott Lexington, KY
vant, but instead defined the qualified individual as a Certified Nuclear Medicine Technologist. The AAPM responded promptly, as did a number of members in Indiana, emphasizing our belief that a qualified medical physicist has the correct c redentials to perf o rm this work, and that the SSRs should be consulted before new regulations are written. The legislation has been withdrawn, at least for now. However, members must
Our Presence and Influence on State and National Policymaking CRCPD In th e January issue, I described the AAPM’s opportunities to influence policymaking as one of the most important opportunities for our association. On a number of occasions during the past few months we have seized this opportunity to assert ourselves. Late last year, we submitted comments to a state radiological health department that was on the verge of adopting an AAPM report as a part of their regulations. We commented (through a letter written by Chairman of the Board Larry Rothenberg) that we felt this was an inappropriate use of an AAPM publication. Instead, we recommended that the state agency consider adopting the Suggested State Regulations (SSRs) published by the Council of Radiation Control Program Directors (CRCPD). The AAPM has invested considerable effort into the SSRs by attending the CRCPD annual meetings, presenting symposia, and participating on committees that draft the SSRs. In May, the AAPM will again
present a symposium immediately prior to the CRCPD annual meeting in Louisville. The AAPM’s effort is directed by our liaisons to the CRCPD, Chuck Kelsey, Keith Strauss, Dick Lane, Melissa Martin, and Frances Harshaw. Nurturing this relationship has been given a high priority by previous AAPM Presidents, and I will do the same, as I believe it represents one of our best opportunities to contribute to the development of realistic and useful regulations. More recently, I was alerted by several members in Indiana that legislation had been forwarded that would specify the credentials of individuals qualified to perform inspections of radiation sources and radiationproducing machines. Those credentials did not include qualifications we consider rele-
1
INSIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS President’s Column………………p. 1 1999 Budget………………………p. 3 JCAHO/ACR Agreement…………p. 6 Strategic Planning…………………p. 6 Executive Director’s Column……p. 8 PACS/Electronic Imaging…………p. 9 Letters to Editor…………………p. 10 Chicago 2000……………………p. 11 Announcements…………………p. 12 Summer School……………….…p. 15