Community Strengths in NE Florida
from the Perspectives of Residents A Participatory Assessment for the United Way of NE Florida
June 2023
Prepared by The Proximity People, LLC Making Space for Uncommon Conversations with
Community Strengths in NE Florida from the Perspectives of Residents: A Participatory Assessment for the United Way of NE Florida Baker, Clay, Duval, Nassau, and St. Johns Counties by The Proximity People, LLC with 904WARD and the UNF Institute for the Study of Race & Ethnic Relations Table of Contents WHY ASSESS COMMUNITY STRENGTHS? 3 ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW 4 OUR Q METHODOLOGY APPROACH 4 WHAT WE LEARNED FROM COMMUNITY MEMBERS (RESULTS) 6 Q SAMPLES OR SETS OF COMMUNITY/COUNTY STRENGTHS 6 Table 2. Baker County Strengths Q Sample 7 Table 3. Clay/Nassau County Strengths Q Sample 8 Table 4. Duval County Strengths Q Sample 9 Table 5. St. Johns County Strengths Q Sample 10 SHARED PERSPECTIVES REGARDING COMMUNITY STRENGTHS (FACTORS) 11 Clay/Nassau Counties: Three Perspectives on Community Strengths 11 Duval County: Three Perspectives on Community Strengths 14 St. Johns County: Three Perspectives on Community Strengths 17 NEXT STEPS/ADDITIONAL AREAS FOR STUDY 20
Community Strengths in NE Florida from the Perspectives of Residents: A Participatory Assessment for the
United Way of NE Florida
Baker, Clay, Duval, Nassau and St. Johns Counties
Why Assess Community Strengths?
Learning about community needs is important. Data generated from community needs assessments inform priorities and directions for the development of programming and services designed to generate change around the identified needs. However, focusing only on the assessment of needs in a community can produce both limitations and dangers (Guajardo, Guajardo, Janson, & Militello, 2016)1. Notably, framing understandings of communities exclusively through needs invariably produces or supports a deficit lens through which communities and the people who comprise them are viewed.
However, the inclusion of purposeful and strategic efforts to also assess strengths within communities, particularly through the vantages and viewpoints of residents themselves, helps to address those limitations and dangers that can result from assessing only community needs. Perhaps more significantly, the participatory approaches and efforts to assess community strengths can further support strategic planning efforts by building on existing community strengths. In addition, participatory, strength-focused assessment approaches and processes contain their own virtues. Such efforts, like the one used and described here, can also serve to promote community involvement, build community cohesion and empowerment, bring people together, and create possibilities for all involved to develop greater awareness and understanding of community assets, ways to include community in research, and ways to lead collectively (Guajardo, Guajardo, Janson, & Militello, 2016) As such, this participatory approach was developed better understand the strengths, assets, and gifts of communities in NE Florida from the perspectives of residents themselves.
PAGE 3 COMMUNITY STRENGTHS
1 Guajardo, M., Guajardo, F., Janson, C., & Militello, M. (Fall, 2015). Reframing community partnerships in education: Uniting the power of place and wisdom of people. New York: Routledge.
Assessment Overview
We used a research approach called Q methodology for our participatory assessment of community strengths. Q Methodology was developed as a systematic approach to examine human subjectivity (see www.qmethod.org). In doing so, Q methodology reveals the subjective structures of attitudes, opinions, or perspectives that are shared by people around virtually any topic. We designed our Q methodology approach to surface and understand how residents perceive the strengths and assets within and across the NE Florida communities of Baker, Clay, Duval, Nassau, and St. Johns counties. By highlighting aspects of our use of Q methodology in different community contexts and initiatives, we explore not only the impact and selected results of these applications of Q methodology, but also our emergent understandings of the deep congruence between Q methodology and the needs and desires of communities to empower collective member voices, promote native knowledge, and dissolve lines of traditional power hierarchies.
Our Q Methodology Approach
Our Q Methodology assessment approach contained four steps: 1) the creation of four sets of opinion statements about community strengths, 2) area community members sorting the items created to correspond with their particular county in ways that expressed their perspectives, and 3) data analysis of community members’ sorts Each of these steps is described in more detail below.
Step 1. For our assessment, we invited residents of Baker, Clay, Duval, Nassau, and St. Johns counties to respond to the prompt: “What do you consider to be the most significant strengths in your community?” Their responses were gathered through interviews, a brief questionnaire, and from various social media sources in which residents were reflecting on their particular community’s strengths. We then reduced hundreds of responses down to four representative samples of opinion statements representing what residents perceived the strengths to be in their respective counties of Baker, Duval, Clay/Nassau, and St. Johns counties. These sets of opinion statements (called Q samples) on these communities’ strengths were comprised of 4043 items depending on the particular set. An example of a statement is “The community is involved in big decisions,” which was included in each of the four Q samples. These Q samples are listed below in the Results section.
PAGE 4 COMMUNITY STRENGTHS
Step 2. Participants in our process sorted the Q sample statements for their particular county in one of two ways: through online sorting software or through decks of cards in face-to-face gatherings. Regardless of the method of sorting, participants sorted the set of county strengths within a forced distribution grid on a continuum from what they perceived to be the most significant community strengths to the least significant.
For our assessment, 69 residents from the five counties sorted the Q sample of opinion statements representing strengths in their respective counties2 . Participant recruitment was assisted by non-profits within each of the five counties within the United Way of NE Florida’s service area: Baker, Duval, Clay/Nassau, and St. Johns counties.
Black/ African American: 39 White: 23 Latinx: 3 Multiracial: 3 Asian/ Pacific Islander: 2
Age
Youngest: 11 Oldest: 78
Average Age: 49
Step 3. Q methodology uses by-person correlation and factor analytic procedures This process produced several factors, or collective perspectives comprised of individual sorters who viewed their community or county’s strengths similarly. These factors are represented by factor “arrays” or model Q sorts for each shared perspective. process. The resultant factor for each county is described below in the results
2 For the purposes of this process, we combined residents/participants from Clay and Nassau counties.
PAGE 5 COMMUNITY STRENGTHS
Figure 1. Face-to-Face Q sorting Process
Table 1. Background Information for Participants
Sex 45 Female 24 Male Race/Ethnicity
What We Learned from Community Members (Results)
Our Q methodology-based, participatory community strengths assessment produced two types of data. The first type is comprised of the four different sets of opinion statements generated from participating community members regarding what they perceived to be the strengths in their county. These sets of statements, called the Q sample, then function as the research instrument participants engage with when they sort them in ways that reflect their perspectives. The second type of results are the factors, or collectively held perspectives, that were produced by this study. These are produced by statistical analyses of the participants’ sorts.
Q Samples or Sets of Community/County Strengths
These sets of opinion statements, or Q samples, ranged from 40-43 items, each embodying an element of the community which residents viewed as a strength. These items represented a range of types of community strengths. For instance, some strengths were rooted in our natural environment (“The St. Johns River,” “The St. Mary’s River”), while others referenced community organizations (“Our outstanding hospitals and health care organizations ”), and still others represented community climate (“The relaxed atmosphere”), and so on. As much as possible, we tried to retain the original language or vernacular used by participants who identified the strengths originally (“People are proud to live here – Duuuuvaal!”).
Across these four Q samples of statements (Baker, Duval, Clay/Nassau, St. Johns) there were a handful of common items. These were community strengths that were suggested from participants in all five counties. These included strengths such as:
• “Great job market ”
• “Our public libraries.”
• “The leadership of our elected officials.”
• “Our community is accepting and inclusive.”
• “The fantastic weather and climate.”
• “The community is involved in big decisions.”
There were also statements that were distinct within one or another Q sample. Some of these were:
• “The John M. Bethea State Forest” [Baker]
• “The U.S. Navy Bases here.” [Duval]
• “Our outdoor events and venues.” [Clay/Nassau]
• “Our unique history – including maritime and civil rights impact.” [St. Johns]
Each of these four Q samples developed from community members for their respective counties are provided in tables on the following pages below.
PAGE 6 COMMUNITY STRENGTHS
Table 2. Baker County Strengths Q Sample
# Q Sample Statement (Community Strength)
1. Good government policies.
2. The John M. Bethea State Forest.
3. Being an agricultural community.
4. Its country charm.
5. The St. Mary’s River
6. Many people have deep roots here.
7. We have a great location as a small town close to the big city.
8. Work friendly environment.
9. Our community services such as early childhood education programs.
10. Friday night football.
11. Our churches.
12. Our public libraries.
13. The fantastic weather and climate here.
14. Access to outdoor activities and parks like Shoals.
15. Faith is important to people here.
16. Hometown pride.
17. The lower cost of living including lower taxes.
18. Our population is stable – people really aren’t moving in and out.
19. We have good schools. Our school system is the best you can expect from such a small town.
20. There are many opportunities for personal development and growth.
21. Accessible and good roads.
22. Good employment opportunities.
23. People are cooperative here.
24. The fact that things don’t change much here.
25. Businesses are doing well here.
26. The community is involved in big decisions.
27. The relaxed atmosphere.
28. Our small-town scene – everyone knows everyone’s business.
29. People look after each other in small towns.
30. There is a strong law enforcement presence.
31. The love people here have for our community.
32. Our community is safer than most.
33. This is a peaceful place to live.
34. We are a tight-knit community.
35. It is very family-oriented here.
36. The importance of tradition here.
37. We have an important history here represented by places like Heritage Park Village.
38. People here are welcoming and caring.
39. Our community is accepting and inclusive.
40. It is very scenic here.
PAGE 7 COMMUNITY STRENGTHS
Table 3. Clay/Nassau County Strengths Q Sample
# Q Sample Statement (Community Strength)
1. Compassionate businesses, institutions, and individuals.
2. Access to water activities.
3. Having agricultural parts of our community.
4. Our efforts and successes preserving historic buildings.
5. Our outdoor events and venues.
6. Many families have been here for many generations.
7. Our great location.
8. Our spirit of volunteerism to come together and fill the needs.
9. Strong community support for schools, churches, and civic groups.
10. Our community is full of events for individuals and families.
11. Our churches.
12. Our public libraries.
13. The fantastic weather and climate here.
14. Access to outdoor activities and parks.
15. Our arts community.
16. It’s very walkable.
17. The lower cost of living including lower taxes.
18. Our core population has been very stable.
19. We have a high-quality education system (K-12 and FSCJ).
20. There are many opportunities for personal development and growth.
21. Youth Sports programs.
22. Great job market.
23. Live music.
24. There is great collaboration between the business community, nonprofits and government.
25. Industry and small businesses are doing well here.
26. The community is involved in big decisions.
27. The relaxed atmosphere.
28. Our small-town feel.
29. People look after each other in small towns.
30. There is a strong law enforcement presence.
31. The love for our community here.
32. Our community is safe for families.
33. The unique character of our community.
34. Our growth. We are a growing community.
35. Tourism.
36. The importance of tradition to people here.
37. We have an important history here.
38. People here are welcoming and friendly.
39. Our community is accepting and inclusive.
40. It is very scenic here.
41. Our changing demographics are making us more diverse.
42. Hometown pride.
43. It is very family-friendly here.
PAGE 8 COMMUNITY STRENGTHS
Table 4. Duval County Strengths Q Sample
# Q Sample Statement (Community Strength)
1. Our numerous community events and activities that are open to everyone.
2. The St. Johns river.
3. Our higher education institutions (UNF, JU, EWU, FSCJ) and the programs they offer.
4. Free arts and music events here.
5. Our concert and performance venues.
6. Our professional sports teams.
7. Our beaches and the Atlantic Ocean.
8. The U.S. Navy Bases here.
9. Access to biodiverse environments including parks, waterways, and nature reserves.
10. Our creative arts communities.
11. Our strong spiritual/religious communities.
12. Our public libraries.
13. The fantastic weather and climate here.
14. Outdoor recreational opportunities.
15. Museums including MOSH, MOCA, and The Cummer.
16. Local nonprofit organizations and the services they provide.
17. The lower cost of living including lower taxes.
18. Our outstanding hospitals and health care organizations.
19. Our local schools and school systems.
20. There are many opportunities for personal development and growth.
21. The leadership our elected officials provide.
22. Great job market.
23. People here seem to share common goals and plans for our community.
24. The leadership provided by local organizations and institutions.
25. There is a strong economic infrastructure that supports small businesses.
26. The community is involved in big decisions.
27. Our local news organizations – both TV and newspaper.
28. Duval is a big city, but the feeling of connection in our individual neighborhoods.
29. People are caring and look out for each other here.
30. I know my neighbors.
31. The sense of community
32. Our community feels safe.
33. The diverse and vibrant cultures here.
34. Duval is growing.
35. We are respectful to each other here.
36. Our unique culture and history as a city and community.
37. There is a lot to do here and it’s fun here.
38. People here are welcoming and friendly.
39. Our community is accepting and inclusive.
40. This is a beautiful place to live.
41. People here have the courage to take on tough issues and have difficult conversations.
42. People are proud to live here – Duuuuvaal!
PAGE 9 COMMUNITY STRENGTHS
Table 5. St. Johns County Strengths Q Sample
# Q Sample Statements (Strengths)
1. High levels of home ownership.
2. The St. Johns river.
3. Being an agricultural community.
4. Nice festivals and parades.
5. Our concert and performance venues.
6. Many people here are from families who have lived here for generations.
7. Our beaches and the Atlantic Ocean.
8. Our spirit of volunteerism.
9. The respect for the environment here.
10. There are many activities for individuals and families.
11. Our churches.
12. Our public libraries.
13. The fantastic weather and climate here.
14. Outdoor recreational opportunities.
15. Our great art community. There are many opportunities and venues for it.
16. Our many active charity initiatives.
17. The lower cost of living including lower taxes.
18. Our community is prosperous.
19. Our local schools and school systems.
20. There are many opportunities for personal development and growth.
21. We have good civil servants.
22. Great job market.
23. People here share goals and objectives for our community.
24. The leadership provided by local organizations and institutions.
25. Small businesses are thriving here.
26. The community is involved in big decisions.
27. People here understand their responsibilities.
28. Small towns help people feel connected to each other. You know just about everyone.
29. People look after each other in small towns.
30. Law enforcement creates a strong sense of security.
31. There is a strong sense of community here.
32. Our community feels safe.
33. People do not judge or discriminate here.
34. St. Johns county is growing.
35. People have a good sense of respect.
36. Our unique history – including maritime and civil rights impact.
37. People are happy here.
38. People here are welcoming and friendly.
39. Our community is accepting and inclusive.
40. This is a beautiful place to live.
41. People here share many things in common with each other – including values.
42. People are proud to live here.
43. It is very family-friendly here.
PAGE 10 COMMUNITY STRENGTHS
Shared Perspectives Regarding Community Strengths (Factors)
Human subjectivity – our personal feelings, perspectives, opinions – is complex. Even on an individual level, opinions and perspectives we hold toward things including our communities are often full of nuance and sometimes even contradictions. When we are seeking to learn about how groups or communities perceive things, there is even more complexity given the range of perspectives that generally exist around virtually every considerable topic.
For our Q Methodology approach, we began by first acknowledging and embracing the complexity and diversity of perspectives we know exist around how community members in NE Florida view their respective county’s strengths. Our statistical analyses of our 69 participants’ Q sorts produced three findings, or factors, for each three NE Florida communities: Clay/Nassau Counties, Duval County, and St. Johns County. This is an ongoing assessment process and we are still working with the Baker County community in order to gather sufficient sorts for us to better understand the range of shared perspectives there.
Each of these findings or factors below represent holistic perspectives shared by groups of participants around community strengths. These factors – and the patterns of opinion data within them - allowed us to make holistic meaning of and from the complexity and diversity of these shared perspectives. Just as individual participants sorted items in forced distribution grids from the most significant strengths on the right of the grid to the least significant strengths on the left, the perception data represented by the shared factors are organized the same way. Key, then, to understanding these findings or factors are the items that were viewed by that group as being most (4s and 3s) and least (-4s and -3s) significant strengths in their counties.
Clay/Nassau Counties: Three Perspectives on Community Strengths
Our analyses of participant sorts from Clay and Nassau County residents produced three distinct perspectives. These three perspectives are briefly described below. For each perspective description, we included a table that shows the most (4s and 3s) and least significant strengths (-4s) and how those strengths were viewed by the other two perspectives, and we also included the entire configuration of how each perspective collectively viewed each of the strengths in that county’s Q sample.
Perspective 1: Geography, Safety, Uniqueness
The first Clay and Nassau County perspective of how residents viewed their communities’ strengths placed most significance on their geography, safety, and uniqueness. This perspective viewed the least significant strengths as their job markets, the cost of living, and the idea that their community is “accepting and inclusive.” One participant on this factor shared, “Let’s say it. This is a great place in so many ways. I love our location. It’s laid back in most of the right ways. It's safe. It just is becoming unaffordable for too many.”
PAGE 11 COMMUNITY STRENGTHS
Perspective 1. Clay/Nassau Counties
Perspective 2: Caring, Collaboration, and Acceptance in a Changing Community
The second Clay and Nassau County perspective of how residents viewed their communities’ strengths placed most significance on social elements that included the “spirit of volunteerism” among those in their communities, strong support for institutions including schools and churches, collaboration between sectors of the communities, and the compassion people exhibit in their small-town communities. One of the participants from this group summarized these strengths by saying, “People really care about others here and we put that care into action We volunteer, we support, and we look after their neighbors.”
For the perspective 2 participants, least significant strengths were all related to perceptions related to community residents who have lived there for generations. These included the importance some place on tradition, the idea that there is a stable core population in the communities, and that many families in these communities had lived there for many generations. Regarding these items, another participant who was part of this perspective said,
PAGE 12 COMMUNITY STRENGTHS Selected Statement (Q Sample Item) Perspective 1 2 3 27. The relaxed atmosphere. 4 0 2 7. Our great location. 4 -1 -1 32. Our community is safe for families. 4 2 4 33. The unique character of our community. 3 1 1 13. The fantastic weather and climate here. 3 1 3 22. Great job market. -4 -2 -2 39. Our community is accepting and inclusive. -4 2 0 17. The lower cost of living including lower taxes. -4 -3 -3
“I’m all for respecting roots, but too often it seems like the ‘old guard’ here is holding our community back from growing into something even stronger.”
Perspective 3: Embracing Tradition, Welcoming Change and Growth
The third Clay and Nassau County perspective of how residents viewed their communities’ strengths placed most significance on safety, tourism, and a balance between tradition and new ideas brought in by people moving into the community. One of the participants in this groups summarized some of these strengths by saying, “We have lots of visitors, but we remain safe. We also seem to be able to hold onto the best of ‘the old’ and mix it up with fresh ideas coming in from people who are moving in more recently.” This perspective viewed the least significant strengths as their job markets, the cost of living, and the idea that their community is “accepting and inclusive.” On the other hand, this perspective viewed as least significant, the
PAGE 13 COMMUNITY STRENGTHS
Selected Statement (Q Sample Item) Perspective 1 2 3 8. Our spirit of volunteerism to come together and fill the needs. 1 4 1 9. Strong community support for schools, churches, and civic groups. 2 4 0 1. Compassionate businesses, institutions, and individuals. -3 4 -1 24. There is great collaboration between the business community, nonprofits and government. -2 3 -1 29. People look after each other in small towns. -2 3 0 18 Our core population has been very stable. -2 -4 -2 36. The importance of tradition to people here. -1 -4 3 6. Many families have been here for many generations. -1 -4 0
Perspective 2 Clay/Nassau Counties
communities’ outdoor events and venues, the idea that it is “walkable,” and efforts there to preserve historic buildings.
Perspective 3. Clay/Nassau Counties
Duval County: Three Perspectives on Community Strengths
Our analyses of participant sorts from Duval County residents produced three distinct perspectives. These three perspectives are briefly described below. For each perspective description, we included a table that shows the most (4s and 3s) and least significant strengths (-4s) and how those strengths were viewed by the other two perspectives, and we also included the entire configuration of how each perspective collectively viewed each of the strengths in the Duval County Community Strengths Q sample.
PAGE 14 COMMUNITY STRENGTHS
Selected Statement (Q Sample Item) Perspective 1 2 3 32. Our community is safe for families. 4 2 4 35. Tourism. -1 -2 4 41. Our changing demographics are making us more diverse. -3 3 4 36. The importance of tradition to people here. -1 -4 3 38. People here are welcoming and friendly. -1 3 3 16. It’s very walkable. 0 0 -4 5. Our outdoor events and venues. 2 -3 -4 4. Our efforts and successes preserving historic buildings. 2 -1 -4
Perspective 1: Community Pride, Unique Culture, and Our Bodies of Water
The first Duval County perspective of how residents viewed their communities’ strengths placed most significance on some of its natural resources, its unique culture and history, and the pride people have toward it One of the participants who shared this perspective said, that “This is such a beautiful community. We have great beaches. We have the St. Johns River, and we have a powerful history – particularly around Civil Rights - that more should know.” Alternately, this perspective viewed the least significant strengths as being its local schools, the idea that big decisions involve community members, and the leadership from elected leaders. Another participant on this factor shared, “We have the potential to be great. The only thing holding us back is we aren’t electing the right leaders who can unite us and help us get there.”
Perspective 2. Organizations and Institutions and Arts Communities
The second Duval County perspective of how residents viewed their communities’ strengths placed most significance on its organizations, institutions, and arts communities. One of the participants who was part of this group wrote, “We have some invaluable organizations here and they bring so much leadership to Jacksonville. We are a national leader in health care. We have extraordinary nont-for-profits, a great arts scene, and of course the U.S. Navy brings us
PAGE 15 COMMUNITY STRENGTHS
Selected Statement (Q Sample Item) Perspective 1 2 3 36. Our unique culture and history as a city and community. 4 1 1 42. People are proud to live here – Duuuuvaal! 4 -3 -3 7. Our beaches and the Atlantic Ocean. 4 1 -1 40. This is a beautiful place to live. 3 -2 1 2. The St. Johns river. 3 3 -2 19. Our local schools and school systems. -4 -4 -1 21. The leadership our elected officials provide. -4 -3 -4 26. The community is involved in big decisions. -4 -4 -2 Perspective
1 Duval
leadership and talent.” This perspective viewed the least significant strengths as its schools, the idea that the community feels safe to many, and the notion that the community is involved in big decisions. A participant on this factor wrote, “Our elected leaders seem to forget that they should be making decisions along us, the people who elected them and we represent. Too often it seems like they prefer to govern in the dark.”
Perspective 2. Duval County
Perspective 3. Diverse Cultures, Accessible Activities, and Arts Communities
The third Duval shared perspective regarding how residents viewed the county’s strengths placed most significance on its diverse cultures, its arts communities, events, and activities that are available to all, and the willingness of residents to taking on tough issues One Perspective 1 participant said, “I love how our community seems to be growing more diverse each year. You really see it when we have community events like our Jazz Festival.” This perspective viewed the least significant strengths as the cost of living, the Navy bases in the county, and the leadership from elected officials.
PAGE 16 COMMUNITY STRENGTHS
Selected Statement (Q Sample Item) Perspective 1 2 3 16. Local nonprofit organizations and the services they provide. -1 4 3 18. Our outstanding hospitals and health care organizations. 1 4 -3 15. Museums including MOSH, MOCA, and The Cummer. 0 4 2 10. Our creative arts communities. 0 3 4 8. The U.S. Navy Bases here. 0 3 -4 19. Our local schools and school systems. -4 -4 -1 32. Our community feels safe. 0 -4 0 26. The community is involved in big decisions. -4 -4 -2
Perspective 3. Duval County
St. Johns County: Three Perspectives on Community Strengths
Our analyses of participant sorts from St. Johns County residents produced three distinct perspectives. These three perspectives are briefly described below. For each perspective description, we included a table that shows the most (4s and 3s) and least significant strengths (-4s) and how those strengths were viewed by the other two perspectives, and we also included the entire configuration of how each perspective collectively viewed each of the strengths in the St. Johns County Community Strengths Q sample.
Perspective 1: Great Schools, Low Cost of Living, Community Involvement in Decisions
The first St. Johns County perspective of how residents viewed their communities’ strengths placed most significance on lower taxes and cost of living, community involvement in big decisions, and the local schools and school system One Perspective 1 participant said, that “People move here for the great schools and decent cost of living. Once here, we make sure we have a say in things.” This perspective viewed the least significant strengths as being its
PAGE 17 COMMUNITY STRENGTHS Selected Statement (Q Sample Item) Perspective 1 2 3 10. Our creative arts communities. 0 3 4 33. The diverse and vibrant cultures here. 3 1 4 1. Our numerous community events and activities that are open to everyone. -1 3 4 41. People here have the courage to take on tough issues and have difficult conversations. -3 0 3 36. The importance of tradition to people here. -1 -4 3 39. Our community is accepting and inclusive. -3 -1 3 17. The lower cost of living including lower taxes. -2 -1 -4 21. The leadership our elected officials provide. -4 -3 -4 8. The U.S. Navy Bases here. 0 3 -4
performance venues, its beauty, and the weather. Another participant on this factor shared, “Some parts of our community are beautiful, but that’s not everywhere. And the weather is a given – we have many more strengths than the Florida sun.”
Perspective 1. St. Johns County
Perspective 2: Safe, Unique History, Beautiful Beaches
The second St. Johns perspective of how residents viewed their communities’ strengths placed most significance on its unique history, feelings of personal safety, and the Atlantic Ocean and its beaches. One of the participants who was part of this group wrote, “Whether you’re a visitor or part of a family that’s lived here for generations, you think about two things with our county - our beaches beautiful beaches and our enthralling history.” This perspective viewed the least significant strengths as its civil servants, the role of law enforcement to make people feel safe, and community qualities of being non-judgmental and non-discriminating. One participant on this factor said, “I like it here, but I feel like people here are judging me, including the police, and that makes me feel less safe.”
PAGE 18 COMMUNITY STRENGTHS
Selected Statement (Q Sample Item) Perspective 1 2 3 17. The lower cost of living including lower taxes. 4 -3 1 26. The community is involved in big decisions. 4 -2 2 19. Our local schools and school systems. 4 1 2 25. Small businesses are thriving here. 3 0 -3 33. People do not judge or discriminate here. 3 -4 -1 5. Our concert and performance venues. -4 0 0 40. This is a beautiful place to live. -4 2 0 13. The fantastic weather and climate here. -4 0 -3
Perspective 2. St. Johns County
Perspective 3:
The third St. Johns Country shared perspective regarding how residents viewed the community’s strengths placed most significance on its outdoor recreational opportunities, its job market, and the friendly and family-friendly atmosphere One Perspective 3 participant said, “This is a great place to raise a family – especially if y’all are ‘outdoorsy.’ There also seems to be so many jobs that they can’t even fill all the openings ” This perspective viewed the least significant strengths as its beaches and the ocean, the St. Johns River, and the spirit of volunteerism in the community One of this perspective’s participants noted, “The St. Johns and our beaches are wonderful, but there are many more land-based things to do.”
PAGE 19 COMMUNITY STRENGTHS Selected Statement (Q Sample Item) Perspective 1 2 3 36. Our unique history – including maritime and civil rights impact. 1 4 2 32. Our community feels safe. 3 4 -1 7. Our beaches and the Atlantic Ocean. 0 4 -4 31. There is a strong sense of community here. -1 3 -2 6. Many people here are from families who have lived here for generations. 1 3 -1 21. We have good civil servants. -1 -4 0 33. People do not judge or discriminate here. 3 -4 -1 30. Law enforcement creates a strong sense of security. 2 -4 1
Next Steps/Additional Areas for Study
Beginning in 2023, 904WARD has been coordinating with the United Way of NE Florida to host community presentation on previously collected data in order to invite community responses to those data as well as recommendations for areas of further exploration. Results from these presentations and subsequent conversations led to our development of another series of focus groups to delve further into our growing array of community data. It was from these conversations that some community members also expressed a desire for our organizations to focus on community strengths and assets in addition to community needs and challenges. These processes, the data they generate, and the community involvement that fuel both will culminate in a comprehensive report on our findings that will help inform the next iteration of United Way of NE Florida areas of focus.
PAGE 20 COMMUNITY STRENGTHS Selected Statement (Q Sample Item) Perspective 1 2 3 14. Outdoor recreational opportunities. 0 3 4 22. Great job market. 3 1 4 43. It is very family-friendly here. -1 3 4 38. People here are welcoming and friendly. -3 -1 3 4 Nice festivals and parades. -3 -1 3 7. Our beaches and the Atlantic Ocean. 0 4 -4 2. The St. Johns river. -3 0 -4 8. Our spirit of volunteerism. -2 1 -4
Perspective 3. St. Johns County
Some of the areas for additional study and/or further research using or resulting from this Q Methodology process include, but are not limited to:
• Successfully recruiting more Baker County residents to participate sufficient to generating findings.
• Using this process to look more closely at specific groups within counties/communities. For instance, how do residents under the age of 25 perceive their communities’ strengths? How do residents of particular racial/ethnic backgrounds perceive community strengths? Etc.
• Alongside diverse community members, strategize how the community strengths identified in this process can be leveraged to support efforts to address previously identified community needs and challenges.
• Take deeper dives into some of the community strengths identified here by participants as being the “most significant” across perspectives. Learning more about these strengths, as perceived by community members, could be an important sources of learning for those involved with the particular strengths (E.g. St. Johns Riverkeeper) or for those in neighboring counties for whom these strengths may not be viewed with as much significance. Some of these strengths could include:
o Our community is safe for families [Clay/Nassau Counties]
o The St. Johns River [Duval County]
o The Local Schools and School System [St. Johns County]
• Further extending the participatory nature of this Q Methodological approach to include participants in the analyses of data they themselves produced in the first place.
PAGE 21 COMMUNITY STRENGTHS
904WARD Northeast Florida Community Survey 2022
Methodological Statement
The 2022 904ward Northeast Florida Community Survey was conducted by the Public Opinion Research Lab (PORL) at the University of North Florida and sponsored by 904WARD. This study utilized a dual frame, multi-modal design, incorporating both telephone and online surveys.
The population of study is adult residents of Florida, living in Baker, Clay, Duval, Nassau, and St. Johns Counties Listed sampling frames for the online and telephone studies were provided by CINT and Dynata. The final sample consists of 877 responses completed online, and 236 on the telephone, for a total of 1,113 respondents
The online survey was administered via Qualtrics between October 13 and Nov 4, 2022. Telephone data collection took place at PORL facility with its 27-station Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) system from October 31 to November 9, 2022 Respondents were contacted by live callers via telephone from 4:00 to 9:00 p.m. daily with up to 4 callbacks. The telephone portion of this study had a 5% response rate, using the American Association of Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) Response Rate 3 (RR3) calculations.
Table 1 shows the sample sizes and margins of sampling error for each of the five surveyed counties. The overall margin of error for the study is +/- 2.9 percentage points. Please note the margin of error within each county is significantly greater than the total sample. For this reason, the three smaller counties (Baker, Clay, and Nassau) were grouped together to form a larger group for more meaningful comparison. The sample sizes and margins of error for these three geographical groups are listed in Table 2.
To ensure a representative sample and to adjust for nonresponse bias, all data were weighted to the adult populations of Baker, Clay, Duval, Nassau, and St. Johns Counties Duval and St. Johns Counties were each weighted separately, and Baker, Clay, and Nassau were weighted as a group, due to smaller sample sizes. The weighting process had two steps: each geography was first weighted by educational attainment for individuals 25 and older. Then data were weighted to age, sex, race, party registration, and geography Demographic weights were calculated using the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) 2020 5year estimates for the adult populations of Baker, Clay, Duval, Nassau, and St. Johns Counties. Party registration information was obtained from the election authorities in each county. All weighted demographic variables were applied using the SPSS version 27 rake weighting function, which won’t assign a weight if one of the demographics being weighted is missing. Individuals without a weight were manually assigned a weight of 1.
Stratum Sample Size MoE Baker n=106 +/-9.5 pts Clay n=203 +/-6.9 pts Duval n=399 +/-4.9 pts Nassau n=97 +/-10.0 pts St. Johns n=308 +/-5.6 pts Total n=1,113 +/-2.9 pts
Table 1. County, Sample Size & Margin of Error
Stratum Sample Size MoE Duval n=399 +/-4.9 pts St. Johns n=308 +/-5.6 pts Baker/Clay/Nassau n=406 +/-4.9 pts Total n=1,113 +/-2.9 pts
Table 2. County Group, Sample Size & Margin of Error
This survey was directed by Dr. Michael Binder, PORL faculty director and UNF professor of political science. The PORL is a full-service survey research facility that provides tailored research to fulfill each client’s individual needs from political economic, social, and cultural projects. The PORL opened in 2001 and is an independent, non-partisan center, a charter member of the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) Transparency Initiative and a member of the Association of Academic Survey Research Organizations (AASRO). As members of AAPOR, the PORL’s goal is to support sound and ethical practices in the conduct of survey and public opinion research. For more information about PORL, our data, or methodology, visit www.unf.edu/coas/porl or contact porl@unf.edu
Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 10% 6% 14% 9% 17% 10% 10% 9% 13% 12% 8% 10% 7% 18% 12% 12% 9% 4% 10% 155 25 77 23 28 58 94 87 68 119 14 18 4 42 26 30 21 10 26 11% 11% 12% 13% 8% 12% 10% 11% 12% 10% 10% 20% 12% 13% 10% 8% 10% 12% 13% 116 28 45 25 16 46 67 76 40 68 15 25 8 26 19 14 15 17 25 8% 6% 11% 7% 6% 7% 9% 9% 5% 9% 8% 4% 9% 5% 7% 8% 5% 12% 10% 87 17 47 11 7 32 55 65 22 65 10 5 5 12 12 11 6 20 26 10% 11% 10% 8% 13% 10% 11% 10% 10% 10% 11% 13% 8% 10% 9% 16% 12% 9% 7% 109 31 46 15 16 35 73 72 36 76 13 16 4 17 17 22 16 15 22 14% 14% 9% 18% 18% 11% 16% 15% 10% 13% 16% 17% 13% 12% 16% 12% 19% 12% 12% 139 47 38 29 21 42 93 102 37 93 23 17 5 19 27 24 25 19 25 12% 16% 10% 11% 9% 12% 12% 12% 14% 11% 17% 8% 15% 10% 18% 14% 9% 16% 7% 138 51 44 25 14 47 89 82 56 95 24 10 8 19 34 34 15 21 15 11% 13% 9% 12% 6% 11% 11% 10% 12% 11% 13% 13% 2% 9% 8% 13% 12% 9% 13% 111 36 41 22 11 38 73 67 44 78 15 15 1 17 16 18 18 13 29 9% 11% 10% 7% 8% 12% 7% 9% 10% 9% 8% 2% 25% 9% 8% 8% 8% 11% 10% 89 22 45 13 8 42 47 56 32 66 10 2 9 15 11 15 10 19 18 6% 8% 5% 4% 7% 7% 6% 6% 7% 7% 4% 10% 1% 5% 7% 3% 10% 6% 5% 73 22 26 9 14 25 47 45 28 58 6 8 1 9 12 12 15 8 17 5% 2% 6% 8% 7% 6% 5% 6% 3% 6% 5% 5% 1% 7% 4% 5% 5% 6% 6% 58 8 24 16 9 28 30 45 13 42 8 5 1 12 8 8 6 10 14 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% 5% 5% <1% <1% 7% 2% 1% 2% 2% 4% 8% 38 11 17 5 5 15 23 22 15 33 1 1 2 3 4 3 5 6 16 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 10% 9% 16% 13% 155 45 54 56 11% 12% 9% 10% 116 45 29 42 8% 8% 5% 12% 87 31 13 43 10% 10% 9% 8% 109 47 29 33 14% 16% 12% 9% 139 58 39 42 12% 10% 17% 15% 138 39 52 47 11% 12% 10% 8% 111 45 27 39 9% 10% 12% 7% 89 32 30 27 6% 6% 5% 8% 73 23 17 33 5% 6% 5% 5% 58 23 14 21 Don't Know/Refusal 3% 4% 1% 6% 38 11 4 23 Health & Healthcare Neighborhood Infrastructure Transportation Other County What are the greatest assets you see in your neighborhood that nonprofits can support? * Select Demographics Total Sex Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Age Party Education Safety Economy Food Security Housing Mental Health Health & Healthcare What are the greatest assets you see in your neighborhood that nonprofits can support? * County Neighborhood Infrastructure Transportation Other Don't Know/Refusal Total Education Safety Economy Food Security Housing Mental Health Crosstabulations and Frequencies Percentages located in crosstabulations on the following pages consist of weighted data, while observations are raw, unweighted totals. See the methodological statement for more about weighting. 904WARD Northeast Florida Community Survey 2022
are the greatest need you see in your neighborhood that nonprofits can address?
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 7% 6% 7% 8% 8% 7% 7% 6% 9% 7% 6% 8% 7% 15% 7% 7% 8% 5% 3% 87 20 36 13 15 31 55 47 40 61 13 10 3 21 13 19 14 12 8 15% 16% 16% 8% 17% 14% 15% 15% 13% 14% 17% 20% 9% 15% 14% 16% 17% 16% 11% 138 38 60 17 22 47 88 95 43 95 23 16 4 31 24 24 17 21 21 10% 8% 13% 6% 10% 9% 11% 10% 8% 10% 10% 9% 8% 10% 9% 9% 6% 11% 12% 110 24 59 12 13 43 67 77 32 79 13 12 5 18 17 15 11 18 31 11% 11% 11% 11% 11% 8% 13% 11% 10% 12% 8% 9% 16% 8% 8% 16% 14% 11% 9% 115 35 43 19 15 29 84 75 40 86 9 13 7 17 13 23 19 18 25 14% 16% 9% 19% 13% 13% 15% 15% 12% 14% 17% 18% 7% 11% 17% 17% 19% 11% 10% 147 48 44 30 21 45 101 104 43 106 20 17 3 19 26 31 29 20 22 11% 10% 11% 12% 9% 9% 12% 9% 14% 11% 9% 10% 11% 13% 15% 9% 11% 13% 6% 135 39 52 27 16 40 92 78 57 98 16 14 6 27 35 25 17 17 14 9% 10% 9% 10% 8% 11% 8% 9% 10% 8% 10% 8% 15% 5% 13% 6% 4% 11% 13% 101 25 43 22 10 45 55 65 36 70 10 13 5 13 20 12 10 12 33 7% 5% 8% 7% 7% 8% 6% 7% 7% 7% 6% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 7% 8% 8% 78 16 34 16 9 32 46 50 27 53 10 9 4 15 13 8 11 13 17 9% 12% 8% 8% 8% 11% 7% 9% 9% 8% 12% 5% 14% 7% 9% 13% 10% 7% 8% 96 32 30 20 14 46 48 56 40 61 18 8 8 11 16 23 14 10 22 5% 4% 3% 7% 7% 6% 3% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% 2% 6% 3% 1% 6% 4% 8% 61 13 23 14 11 28 33 40 21 41 7 9 2 16 7 6 9 6 17 4% 2% 5% 3% 3% 5% 3% 4% 3% 5% - 1% 5% 2% 1% 2% <1% 4% 12% 45 8 26 3 3 22 22 32 12 43 0 1 1 3 2 5 1 11 23 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 7% 7% 6% 9% 87 34 19 34 12% 19% 7% 8% 138 76 24 38 10% 9% 9% 11% 110 37 26 47 9% 12% 8% 7% 115 50 29 36 14% 15% 11% 15% 147 58 37 52 12% 10% 17% 10% 135 41 56 38 9% 9% 8% 10% 101 30 26 45 8% 7% 10% 7% 78 25 29 24 9% 7% 12% 10% 96 28 32 36 6% 4% 6% 7% 61 13 19 29 5% 3% 5% 7% 45 7 11 27 Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 49% 46% 54% 49% 35% 54% 44% 44% 59% 50% 43% 43% 59% 47% 53% 40% 43% 46% 59% 605 151 280 102 58 247 353 354 250 448 63 59 27 84 99 94 85 91 151 40% 43% 35% 39% 50% 35% 44% 43% 34% 39% 43% 48% 32% 37% 30% 48% 52% 43% 34% 390 121 126 70 66 126 258 268 120 269 55 46 18 71 59 74 60 56 69 8% 6% 10% 8% 12% 8% 8% 9% 7% 10% 7% 8% 2% 12% 9% 9% 6% 8% 6% 87 17 36 15 19 26 58 67 20 61 12 13 1 24 19 19 7 9 9 3% 3% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% -13% 1% 6% 2% 7% 4% 8% 2% - 2% <1% 25 5 7 6 6 8 17 25 0 11 8 3 2 11 8 3 0 2 1 1% 1% <1% - - <1% 1% 1% <1% <1% 1% <1% - 1% 1% 1% - - <1% 6 4 1 0 0 1 5 5 1 4 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 3
* Select Demographics
In
neighborhood
* Select Demographics Sex Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Age Economy Food Security Housing Mental Health Health & Healthcare Party Neighborhood Infrastructure Transportation Sex Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Age Education Safety Total Party Other Don't Know/Refusal Don't Know/Refusal Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree Safety Economy Food Security Housing Mental Health Health & Healthcare Neighborhood Infrastructure Transportation Other Don't Know/Refusal Total County Education What
the greatest
neighborhood
nonprofits can address? * County Total
What
the
where I live… I feel safe
are
need you see in your
that
Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 49% 38% 65% 63% 605 148 189 268 40% 47% 29% 30% 390 189 96 105 8% 11% 4% 6% 87 48 16 23 3% 4% 1% 1% 25 13 5 7 1% <1% 1% <1% 6 1 2 3 Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 13% 17% 13% 9% 9% 13% 13% 15% 9% 9% 26% 21% 7% 12% 30% 12% 9% 11% 4% 117 44 43 15 13 41 74 86 31 60 30 25 2 25 41 19 11 12 9 22% 18% 24% 23% 30% 19% 24% 24% 17% 22% 19% 21% 30% 25% 18% 33% 24% 24% 13% 206 49 79 40 35 64 136 148 58 142 25 24 14 42 38 49 28 26 23 32% 37% 26% 36% 29% 32% 32% 31% 34% 32% 30% 33% 32% 32% 31% 29% 36% 25% 38% 335 105 121 61 45 121 213 212 121 243 43 34 13 58 60 48 51 43 75 32% 27% 37% 32% 31% 35% 30% 29% 40% 36% 24% 22% 30% 30% 19% 25% 30% 41% 46% 442 97 203 74 54 177 261 262 179 340 40 37 17 63 43 73 60 77 124 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% <1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% - <1% 13 3 4 3 2 5 7 11 2 8 1 2 2 3 4 2 2 0 2 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 13% 17% 5% 8% 117 70 19 28 22% 29% 11% 13% 206 119 35 52 32% 34% 27% 27% 335 132 90 113 32% 20% 55% 50% 442 77 158 207 1% <1% 2% 2% 13 1 6 6 Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 59% 55% 66% 59% 45% 62% 56% 53% 72% 62% 47% 58% 62% 54% 57% 44% 57% 62% 72% 686 172 315 115 70 265 415 399 287 510 71 71 28 111 103 95 95 110 171 28% 31% 25% 27% 27% 28% 27% 30% 23% 26% 33% 29% 21% 29% 22% 42% 25% 28% 23% 280 83 97 51 42 106 168 199 79 191 40 35 10 52 47 69 34 36 41 8% 8% 8% 7% 15% 7% 10% 10% 5% 8% 8% 8% 13% 12% 11% 9% 12% 6% 3% 92 24 29 18 20 24 66 73 18 62 12 10 7 22 20 18 14 7 11 5% 5% 2% 7% 11% 3% 6% 6% 1% 3% 11% 4% 5% 4% 9% 6% 5% 4% 2% 47 14 9 9 15 10 37 41 6 25 14 5 3 5 13 8 8 4 9 1% 1% - - 2% 1% 1% 1% <1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% <1% 1% 1% <1% 8 5 0 0 2 3 5 7 1 5 2 1 0 1 3 1 1 1 1 Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Age In the neighborhood where I live… there is a lot of crime * Select Demographics Party Total County Sex Total Don't Know/Refusal Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Age Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal Total Sex Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Party In the neighborhood where I live… I feel safe * County In the neighborhood where I live… there is a lot of crime * County Total County Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal In the neighborhood where I live… I have access to fresh fruits, vegetables and healthy food * Select Demographics
Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 59% 53% 71% 67% 686 208 212 266 28% 32% 18% 25% 280 126 60 94 8% 9% 6% 6% 92 41 20 31 5% 6% 4% 2% 47 23 12 12 1% <1% 1% 1% 8 1 4 3 Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 13% 18% 8% 11% 20% 14% 12% 15% 8% 9% 21% 21% 13% 21% 25% 16% 9% 7% 3% 136 48 35 23 29 47 87 101 35 79 28 24 5 40 37 27 13 12 7 20% 19% 21% 16% 29% 15% 24% 23% 13% 20% 17% 23% 24% 22% 24% 24% 28% 15% 9% 224 58 90 37 38 62 157 166 58 158 25 27 12 47 47 47 39 21 23 28% 29% 28% 32% 22% 27% 30% 27% 31% 29% 25% 27% 37% 31% 27% 28% 28% 28% 28% 289 80 118 52 33 110 178 179 108 203 33 30 20 48 52 48 41 38 60 38% 34% 44% 41% 28% 44% 33% 34% 48% 42% 37% 28% 25% 25% 23% 31% 33% 51% 60% 454 109 205 81 46 185 264 264 189 347 52 39 10 54 46 67 58 87 142 1% 1% 1% - 2% 1% 1% 1% <1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% - <1% 10 3 2 0 3 4 5 9 1 6 1 2 1 2 4 2 1 0 1 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 13% 15% 6% 11% 136 68 25 43 20% 21% 13% 21% 224 90 48 86 28% 31% 20% 26% 289 125 63 101 38% 33% 60% 41% 454 114 168 172 1% 1% 2% 1% 10 2 4 4 Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 16% 21% 13% 13% 17% 16% 17% 18% 13% 12% 26% 24% 15% 17% 35% 17% 17% 9% 4% 167 64 55 19 26 51 114 116 50 98 36 28 4 37 49 30 25 14 11 28% 31% 28% 26% 27% 28% 28% 28% 28% 29% 30% 25% 26% 34% 27% 40% 24% 30% 21% 296 85 115 55 37 104 184 191 105 214 37 29 15 61 57 65 30 40 43 33% 28% 33% 41% 37% 33% 32% 31% 36% 35% 20% 34% 41% 34% 28% 25% 42% 33% 34% 369 87 145 83 51 143 222 230 138 269 32 43 21 62 57 58 62 53 77 22% 18% 26% 19% 18% 21% 23% 22% 22% 23% 22% 15% 17% 14% 10% 15% 16% 28% 41% 264 57 130 34 31 99 165 169 94 202 30 19 8 29 19 33 32 51 99 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 3% - 1% 1% 3% 2% - 1% 17 5 5 2 4 11 6 13 4 10 4 3 0 2 4 5 3 0 3 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 16% 19% 11% 14% 167 82 39 46 28% 31% 22% 25% 296 126 77 93 33% 31% 38% 34% 369 124 114 131 22% 19% 26% 26% 264 64 71 129 1% 1% 3% 2% 17 3 7 7 In the neighborhood where I live… people move in and out frequently * Select Demographics Total Sex Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Age Race/Ethnicity Age Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Total Sex Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal Strongly Disagree Total County Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree In the neighborhood where I live… there are a lot of run-down houses * Select Demographics Don't Know/Refusal Bachelor's Degree Don't Know/Refusal Don't Know/Refusal Party Party Total County Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Total County Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree In the neighborhood where I live… I have access to fresh fruits, vegetables and healthy food * County In the neighborhood where I live… there are a lot of run-down houses * County In the neighborhood where I live… people move in and out frequently * County Don't Know/Refusal
In the neighborhood where I live… most people own their homes * Select Demographics
In the neighborhood where I live… most of the homes are owned by people who do not live there * Select Demographics
do not live there * County
Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 33% 32% 36% 30% 28% 33% 33% 30% 39% 33% 34% 40% 22% 29% 28% 32% 26% 28% 50% 426 111 195 69 41 151 269 250 176 308 50 50 14 59 53 74 54 57 128 37% 36% 40% 38% 25% 34% 39% 37% 36% 37% 31% 37% 41% 34% 38% 33% 47% 42% 27% 391 106 163 71 44 145 241 252 137 283 43 41 18 64 75 63 62 65 61 19% 18% 15% 21% 32% 18% 19% 19% 18% 20% 16% 17% 20% 22% 17% 21% 19% 20% 15% 190 46 61 37 45 59 128 135 54 136 22 23 9 43 38 37 25 22 25 10% 13% 6% 9% 13% 12% 8% 12% 6% 8% 17% 5% 14% 12% 16% 12% 6% 8% 6% 80 30 22 12 15 36 44 65 15 48 21 6 5 21 18 13 8 9 11 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 1% 2% 3% 2% 3% 26 5 9 4 4 17 9 17 9 18 3 2 2 4 2 4 3 5 8 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 33% 27% 49% 40% 426 104 139 183 37% 38% 31% 39% 391 147 100 144 19% 23% 14% 11% 190 97 48 45 10% 12% 5% 4% 80 46 16 18 2% 1% 2% 6% 26 5 5 16 Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 14% 19% 10% 10% 16% 14% 13% 16% 8% 9% 26% 14% 20% 18% 28% 15% 6% 13% 5% 123 49 33 17 20 42 76 97 26 65 34 17 6 30 39 25 8 14 7 22% 21% 17% 27% 29% 21% 22% 22% 20% 22% 19% 30% 20% 25% 21% 29% 27% 19% 13% 224 62 71 51 37 80 140 155 68 149 29 34 11 48 46 47 33 27 23 32% 31% 36% 31% 27% 27% 36% 31% 34% 34% 30% 30% 24% 33% 28% 31% 37% 37% 28% 360 91 159 60 47 113 243 220 139 261 42 39 14 65 58 66 54 55 62 30% 26% 33% 32% 24% 34% 27% 27% 35% 33% 21% 22% 32% 23% 20% 22% 26% 28% 53% 374 88 175 64 38 154 219 226 148 298 29 28 15 44 38 48 52 57 134 3% 3% 3% 1% 5% 5% 2% 3% 3% 2% 4% 5% 5% 2% 3% 3% 4% 4% 2% 32 8 12 1 7 19 13 21 10 20 5 4 2 4 5 5 5 5 7 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 14% 6% 9% 9% 123 68 22 33 22% 24% 16% 20% 224 102 53 69 32% 33% 36% 28% 360 132 118 110 30% 24% 40% 37% 374 88 110 176 3% 2% 2% 7% 32 9 5 18
Don't Know/Refusal Sex Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Age Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Total County Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal Total Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree In the neighborhood where I live… most of the homes are owned by
Party Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Age Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Total Sex Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal Total County Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Party In the neighborhood where I live… most people own their homes
County
people who
*
In the neighborhood where I live… we need more help from nonprofit organizations to help meet people's needs
Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 32% 40% 26% 25% 40% 28% 36% 37% 24% 26% 48% 46% 28% 36% 52% 36% 28% 27% 18% 360 119 124 51 59 110 247 262 98 228 62 57 11 72 89 76 42 41 40 35% 31% 33% 46% 40% 32% 38% 34% 39% 38% 28% 33% 37% 36% 32% 39% 35% 41% 32% 376 96 138 83 52 126 243 235 140 278 41 37 16 65 60 64 53 59 74 19% 19% 24% 18% 10% 22% 17% 19% 20% 23% 13% 13% 21% 16% 12% 17% 26% 23% 22% 217 52 102 41 20 90 126 132 84 167 19 17 12 29 27 37 36 34 54 11% 9% 14% 8% 10% 16% 7% 9% 14% 11% 12% 7% 12% 12% 4% 7% 10% 8% 23% 137 28 72 14 17 71 63 77 59 102 16 10 7 24 10 12 19 19 52 2% 1% 3% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 3% 2% <1% 1% 3% 1% - 1% 1% 2% 5% 23 3 14 4 1 11 12 13 10 18 1 1 2 1 0 2 2 5 13 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 32% 36% 23% 32% 360 146 87 127 35% 40% 29% 28% 376 161 93 122 19% 17% 27% 20% 217 65 72 80 11% 8% 19% 15% 137 25 50 62 2% 1% 3% 5% 23 2 6 15 Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 55% 51% 61% 58% 42% 58% 53% 54% 59% 56% 55% 56% 52% 48% 50% 53% 55% 57% 64% 616 159 277 112 66 234 392 389 240 454 75 69 27 89 86 112 90 97 155 33% 38% 30% 31% 37% 32% 34% 34% 33% 33% 33% 31% 40% 35% 35% 33% 37% 34% 28% 370 101 128 56 47 126 203 219 116 232 44 38 17 65 69 55 47 45 55 9% 9% 8% 9% 12% 8% 10% 10% 7% 9% 8% 11% 7% 13% 13% 11% 6% 7% 5% 98 28 32 20 19 34 64 75 24 71 14 11 3 26 25 16 11 10 11 2% 2% 1% 2% 7% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 4% 2% 1% 2% 2% 3% 2% 3% 1% 24 9 10 5 14 12 26 29 10 28 6 4 1 9 4 6 4 6 10 1% <1% <1% - 2% 1% 1% 1% <1% 1% - - - 2% 1% 1% - - 1% 5 1 3 0 3 2 6 7 1 8 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 2 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 55% 50% 65% 64% 616 195 188 248 33% 38% 25% 27% 370 148 83 105 9% 10% 6% 8% 98 46 22 31 2% 2% 3% 2% 24 7 11 21 1% <1% 2% <1% 5 3 4 1 Total
* Select Demographics Sex Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Age Strongly Agree Total County Sex Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Age Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal In the neighborhood where I live… there is medical care nearby * Select Demographics Total Don't Know/Refusal Party Party Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal In the neighborhood where I live…
* County In the neighborhood where I live… there is medical care nearby * County Total County Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree
we need more help from nonprofit organizations to help meet people's needs
the neighborhood where I live… there is mental health care nearby * Select Demographics
Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 27% 23% 30% 29% 24% 28% 26% 27% 27% 26% 26% 34% 24% 32% 27% 29% 25% 24% 25% 325 72 153 54 38 131 192 206 119 231 36 44 11 53 54 61 44 45 68 35% 35% 36% 35% 37% 34% 35% 35% 35% 36% 32% 31% 39% 31% 29% 37% 42% 32% 37% 380 101 150 72 54 132 243 245 135 272 47 40 19 66 58 69 60 50 77 22% 25% 18% 22% 22% 17% 25% 22% 21% 22% 23% 25% 15% 26% 23% 21% 20% 23% 18% 235 75 80 41 34 70 161 153 81 166 33 27 8 49 46 40 27 34 39 11% 13% 11% 10% 13% 12% 11% 13% 9% 11% 15% 5% 15% 9% 16% 8% 8% 17% 10% 112 37 40 16 18 38 71 81 31 82 17 7 5 18 21 14 14 21 24 5% 5% 5% 5% 4% 8% 3% 4% 8% 5% 4% 5% 7% 3% 5% 5% 4% 4% 9% 61 13 27 10 5 37 24 34 25 42 6 4 5 5 7 7 7 8 25 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 27% 24% 34% 32% 325 100 97 128 35% 35% 35% 35% 380 138 110 132 22% 24% 17% 19% 235 97 61 77 11% 14% 8% 6% 112 50 26 36 5% 4% 7% 8% 61 14 14 33 Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 24% 22% 29% 22% 16% 25% 24% 23% 27% 23% 28% 24% 23% 28% 28% 21% 19% 21% 28% 318 75 155 50 29 120 196 186 131 230 37 34 13 55 52 47 41 46 76 37% 41% 36% 36% 36% 39% 36% 36% 42% 37% 31% 44% 51% 36% 32% 41% 48% 33% 36% 399 117 158 72 47 156 239 250 148 276 47 49 22 67 66 72 62 55 77 25% 22% 25% 28% 28% 24% 25% 26% 22% 28% 20% 24% 14% 22% 25% 23% 21% 27% 27% 255 65 96 48 42 88 161 178 76 189 29 27 8 40 43 48 30 38 55 12% 13% 9% 13% 19% 10% 15% 15% 7% 12% 18% 6% 12% 13% 13% 13% 12% 16% 8% 127 36 37 21 29 35 90 98 29 90 23 10 4 26 22 22 19 16 22 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 3% 1% 1% 3% 1% 3% 3% 1% 2% 2% 2% - 3% 1% 14 5 4 2 2 9 5 7 7 8 3 2 1 3 3 2 0 3 3 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 24% 19% 35% 31% 318 77 103 138 37% 37% 37% 38% 399 145 111 143 25% 28% 18% 22% 255 114 57 84 12% 14% 9% 9% 127 55 34 38 2% 2% 1% 1% 14 8 3 3 Race/Ethnicity Age Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal Somewhat Disagree Total County Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal
Strongly Agree Total County Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Sex Bachelor's
In the neighborhood where I live…
Party Age Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Total Don't Know/Refusal Total Sex Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Party Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal In the neighborhood
In
In
Degree
we as neighbors share our resources and information with each other * Select Demographics
where I live… there is mental health care nearby * County
the neighborhood where I live… we as neighbors share our resources and information with each other * County
where I live… we as neighbors know how to push for changes we want to see
Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 20% 19% 25% 16% 13% 21% 19% 19% 22% 17% 28% 19% 19% 25% 26% 17% 15% 17% 21% 250 55 131 36 22 101 147 148 102 171 38 28 11 45 47 38 31 31 58 36% 34% 36% 40% 34% 37% 35% 34% 40% 35% 32% 36% 50% 36% 32% 40% 34% 38% 36% 391 101 161 76 47 154 233 244 146 275 46 43 22 68 66 68 51 60 77 28% 27% 28% 30% 34% 27% 29% 29% 27% 32% 20% 31% 19% 25% 24% 28% 36% 29% 28% 301 86 107 56 47 98 196 202 97 221 33 34 11 46 48 58 48 42 59 13% 18% 9% 12% 16% 12% 15% 16% 9% 13% 18% 10% 11% 12% 17% 14% 13% 15% 10% 137 48 37 22 29 36 101 99 38 100 20 12 4 28 23 24 18 20 24 2% 2% 2% 1% 4% 4% 2% 3% 2% 3% 1% 4% - 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 6% 34 8 14 3 4 19 14 26 8 26 2 5 0 4 2 3 4 5 15 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 20% 18% 25% 24% 250 71 72 107 36% 35% 39% 37% 391 137 115 139 28% 30% 25% 26% 301 125 78 98 13% 15% 8% 8% 137 61 35 41 2% 1% 3% 5% 34 5 8 21 Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 35% 30% 42% 36% 31% 32% 38% 32% 43% 44% 14% 29% 32% 31% 24% 28% 37% 38% 51% 508 127 223 88 64 167 335 305 203 423 23 44 15 73 66 74 73 76 146 12% 20% 5% 7% 19% 13% 11% 15% 5% 4% 32% 22% 13% 17% 21% 19% 12% 3% 3% 91 43 18 9 19 39 51 75 16 25 40 22 4 27 24 22 10 4 4 2% 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 6% - 2% 3% 2% 1% 5%19 7 6 2 2 4 15 10 9 7 4 8 0 4 6 4 1 4 0 <1% <1% - - 1% - <1% <1% - - <1% 1% - 1% 1% - - -3 1 0 0 2 0 3 3 0 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 50% 48% 52% 56% 47% 54% 48% 51% 50% 51% 51% 42% 56% 50% 52% 51% 50% 55% 46% 488 120 202 94 61 197 285 323 162 336 71 45 29 85 89 89 67 73 83 <1% - <1% - 1% <1% <1% <1% <1% <1% - 1% - - - 1% 1% <1%4 0 1 0 1 1 2 3 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 35% 22% 60% 50% 508 92 186 230 12% 17% 2% 4% 91 67 8 16 2% 3% <1% 1% 19 15 1 3 <1% <1% <1%3 1 2 0 50% 57% 37% 45% 488 223 110 155 <1% <1% <1% 1% 4 1 1 2 In the neighborhood
* Select Demographics Party Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Age Total Sex Age Mostly White Mostly Black Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal Total In the neighborhood where you live, are your neighbors mostly… * Select Demographics Party Total County Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal Sex Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Total Mostly White Mostly Black Mostly Hispanic/Latino Mostly Asian Don't Know/Refusal Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree County Mostly Hispanic/Latino Mostly Asian Don't Know/Refusal A Mixture of Different Races and Ethnicities In the neighborhood where I live… we as neighbors know
to push for changes we want to see * County In the neighborhood where you live, are your neighbors mostly… * County A Mixture of Different Races and Ethnicities
how
In the neighborhood where you live, are your neighbors mostly… * Select Demographics Party
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
my county… we have high quality education * Select Demographics
In the neighborhood where you live, are your neighbors mostly… * County In my county… we have high quality education * County Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal
Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 6% 5% 6% 4% 13% 5% 7% 7% 5% 5% 8% 9% 10% 16% 5% 6% 6% 7% 1% 59 15 18 8 17 18 41 40 19 27 15 13 4 23 10 14 5 6 1 90% 93% 89% 93% 81% 88% 92% 90% 91% 93% 87% 85% 85% 83% 92% 90% 91% 89% 95% 1016 279 413 180 126 362 640 654 360 747 119 102 42 165 172 171 142 142 224 4% 2% 5% 3% 6% 7% 1% 4% 3% 3% 4% 6% 5% 2% 3% 3% 4% 5% 4% 38 4 19 5 6 28 10 25 12 19 5 7 2 3 4 6 5 10 8 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 6% 9% 2% 2% 59 40 9 10 90% 89% 96% 90% 1016 348 293 375 4% 3% 3% 8% 38 11 6 21 Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 27% 23% 34% 25% 21% 28% 26% 24% 33% 27% 27% 34% 23% 31% 28% 24% 27% 25% 28% 378 85 187 58 39 148 227 215 161 278 37 47 13 64 57 65 56 53 82 44% 48% 41% 42% 42% 43% 44% 45% 41% 45% 40% 39% 51% 45% 40% 40% 46% 42% 49% 448 134 172 79 56 163 279 305 142 321 58 45 20 82 78 63 61 64 100 19% 16% 18% 23% 26% 15% 22% 20% 16% 20% 14% 19% 18% 18% 17% 25% 15% 23% 16% 196 52 63 41 35 57 137 134 62 139 21 24 10 31 32 48 22 30 32 9% 12% 6% 9% 11% 11% 7% 10% 8% 7% 18% 6% 6% 6% 15% 10% 10% 8% 5% 70 23 18 11 18 31 37 52 18 41 21 4 3 14 17 14 10 7 8 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 3% - 1% 1% 2% 2% 3% 21 4 10 4 1 9 11 13 8 14 2 2 2 0 2 1 3 4 11 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 27% 18% 49% 37% 378 78 145 155 44% 47% 36% 41% 448 181 112 155 19% 22% 11% 16% 196 89 40 67 9% 13% 2% 4% 70 48 6 16 2% 1% 2% 3% 21 3 5 13 Don't Know/Refusal Sex Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Age Mostly Immigrants Age Strongly Agree
Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree Total County
Somewhat
In
Party Total County Mostly Immigrants Mostly American-born Don't Know/Refusal Total Sex Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Mostly
Know/Refusal Total
American-born Don't
my county… many people are struggling to find a stable job * Select Demographics
Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 22% 29% 15% 20% 22% 18% 26% 25% 15% 16% 33% 38% 19% 25% 39% 25% 19% 16% 9% 222 84 64 36 32 65 154 170 52 125 47 41 7 50 58 50 23 19 22 34% 34% 29% 37% 46% 32% 35% 32% 36% 33% 33% 28% 42% 41% 28% 41% 33% 28% 34% 368 97 134 69 63 120 241 235 132 263 42 37 22 70 60 65 49 47 76 30% 26% 35% 35% 18% 33% 28% 29% 33% 35% 20% 22% 31% 25% 25% 25% 35% 35% 34% 334 83 149 68 30 131 200 202 132 255 33 29 14 49 51 52 54 58 70 12% 10% 17% 6% 13% 15% 9% 11% 14% 12% 13% 8% 8% 9% 6% 8% 11% 18% 18% 152 28 80 14 22 74 77 89 62 116 16 13 5 21 14 23 22 26 45 2% 2% 4% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 3% 3% <1% 4% - <1% 2% <1% 2% 3% 6% 37 6 23 6 2 18 19 23 13 34 1 2 0 1 3 1 4 8 20 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 22% 27% 10% 18% 222 110 41 71 34% 35% 26% 32% 368 148 85 135 30% 28% 37% 32% 334 104 113 117 12% 10% 24% 12% 152 35 63 54 2% 1% 3% 6% 37 2 6 29 Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 23% 19% 27% 21% 22% 26% 20% 21% 26% 23% 23% 26% 17% 21% 21% 25% 19% 21% 28% 297 63 146 44 34 128 165 173 123 217 32 36 10 49 41 50 35 39 82 50% 52% 49% 53% 47% 49% 51% 49% 52% 52% 43% 52% 55% 45% 42% 47% 65% 49% 52% 544 152 212 101 70 196 341 346 196 392 63 58 25 82 86 89 95 81 111 21% 24% 19% 19% 26% 17% 26% 23% 17% 20% 24% 19% 22% 29% 24% 24% 15% 23% 15% 218 68 74 37 36 60 157 155 63 149 31 24 12 47 42 48 19 30 32 5% 6% 3% 7% 5% 7% 3% 6% 3% 4% 10% 2% 6% 4% 13% 4% 1% 4% 3% 41 13 11 9 8 18 21 34 7 26 12 2 1 12 16 3 2 4 4 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% <1% 1% - <1% 1% <1% 1% 3% 1% 13 2 7 2 1 6 7 11 2 9 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 4 4 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 23% 17% 32% 33% 297 71 97 129 50% 51% 52% 47% 544 195 156 193 21% 25% 13% 16% 218 106 48 64 5% 7% 1% 2% 41 25 4 12 1% 1% 2% 2% 13 2 3 8 Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Sex Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Age Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Total Party In
Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Age Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Don't Know/Refusal Total Sex Party Total County In my county… most people appear to be healthy * Select Demographics Don't Know/Refusal Strongly Disagree In my county… many people are struggling to
County Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal Total County In my county… most people appear to be healthy * County
find a stable job *
Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 18% 30% 8% 13% 20% 14% 22% 19% 15% 11% 33% 23% 29% 22% 29% 19% 16% 19% 7% 177 80 42 24 28 48 124 123 54 95 41 29 12 45 45 34 17 21 15 25% 33% 17% 25% 28% 26% 25% 24% 28% 25% 31% 30% 10% 28% 25% 28% 30% 21% 23% 268 100 71 52 39 92 173 168 100 180 48 33 6 49 49 51 44 31 44 27% 18% 32% 33% 28% 25% 29% 27% 25% 29% 15% 28% 36% 24% 21% 27% 32% 24% 31% 304 60 139 58 42 105 197 200 103 233 22 32 15 44 45 49 49 46 71 28% 17% 41% 28% 22% 33% 23% 28% 29% 33% 20% 18% 22% 25% 24% 24% 21% 35% 36% 343 55 188 56 37 152 187 217 124 270 26 27 13 52 45 55 39 58 93 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% 3% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 4% 21 3 10 3 3 11 10 11 10 15 2 1 2 1 2 2 3 2 10 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 18% 22% 12% 12% 177 80 46 51 25% 27% 21% 21% 268 111 76 81 27% 27% 25% 29% 304 108 78 118 28% 24% 40% 36% 343 94 104 145 2% 2% 2% 2% 21 6 4 11 Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 29% 36% 23% 31% 30% 26% 33% 34% 20% 24% 47% 32% 25% 34% 47% 35% 29% 22% 12% 289 99 94 54 38 81 204 214 75 181 60 38 10 69 75 51 41 29 24 32% 32% 31% 32% 28% 32% 31% 32% 31% 33% 26% 37% 25% 29% 26% 34% 31% 42% 28% 311 88 114 60 41 119 188 200 110 221 34 42 12 52 50 62 39 53 55 21% 21% 22% 22% 21% 22% 21% 18% 28% 24% 11% 15% 31% 23% 14% 17% 22% 21% 30% 260 65 113 41 36 98 160 151 107 206 17 20 13 39 35 37 36 42 69 17% 11% 23% 15% 20% 20% 14% 16% 19% 17% 16% 15% 18% 14% 13% 14% 18% 14% 27% 237 42 122 36 32 106 127 145 92 172 27 21 12 30 26 39 34 33 75 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% <1% 1% 1% <1% - 1% 1% 1% 4% 16 4 7 2 2 4 12 9 7 13 1 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 10 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 29% 36% 22% 14% 289 150 82 57 32% 35% 24% 28% 311 137 71 103 21% 18% 25% 28% 260 69 74 117 17% 11% 28% 28% 237 42 79 116 1% <1% 1% 3% 16 1 2 13 Sex Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Age Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Total Party In my county… there is a lot of racism * Select Demographics Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal Total Party Total County Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal In my county… there is a lot of homelessness * Select Demographics In my county… there is a lot of racism * County Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal Sex Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Age Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal In my county… there is a lot of homelessness * County Total County Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree
Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 10% 10% 13% 7% 6% 10% 10% 10% 9% 8% 16% 14% 3% 14% 15% 9% 7% 7% 9% 130 34 70 14 10 56 74 80 50 84 21 22 2 26 24 25 14 11 30 36% 29% 41% 41% 35% 42% 30% 36% 37% 35% 31% 41% 52% 42% 33% 32% 31% 36% 41% 386 77 174 76 51 162 218 249 137 269 43 47 23 77 61 56 46 59 86 28% 34% 24% 28% 27% 21% 35% 28% 30% 31% 26% 22% 23% 28% 21% 34% 37% 29% 24% 309 106 103 55 43 84 224 201 108 225 41 31 10 55 46 61 56 39 52 17% 20% 11% 18% 27% 15% 19% 19% 12% 17% 21% 18% 13% 13% 29% 19% 15% 14% 11% 189 62 52 34 37 55 130 132 57 137 28 16 8 29 49 39 22 24 26 9% 7% 12% 6% 6% 12% 6% 7% 12% 10% 5% 6% 9% 3% 2% 6% 10% 15% 15% 99 19 51 14 8 51 45 57 39 78 6 6 5 4 6 10 14 25 39 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 10% 9% 13% 12% 130 40 38 52 36% 38% 33% 35% 386 140 98 148 28% 29% 33% 21% 309 119 105 85 17% 19% 14% 16% 189 77 52 60 9% 6% 7% 16% 99 23 15 61 Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 28% 36% 22% 22% 34% 28% 28% 32% 19% 22% 47% 25% 28% 25% 40% 32% 26% 30% 14% 269 91 92 44 39 96 170 199 70 162 56 33 14 49 60 53 35 41 30 37% 43% 32% 41% 32% 36% 38% 36% 40% 39% 36% 32% 38% 38% 35% 40% 40% 33% 38% 389 127 134 80 43 140 243 239 149 283 52 34 18 67 70 66 61 51 74 24% 15% 32% 29% 22% 25% 24% 23% 28% 28% 10% 28% 31% 25% 18% 20% 26% 24% 33% 298 54 146 50 41 111 184 182 115 226 19 36 13 48 41 47 43 40 79 8% 4% 12% 6% 11% 8% 8% 7% 10% 10% 5% 10% 3% 10% 6% 8% 6% 9% 10% 125 18 66 14 22 46 78 77 47 98 8 15 3 23 14 21 9 21 36 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 5% - 3% 1% 1% 2% 3% 5% 32 8 12 5 4 15 16 22 10 24 4 4 0 4 1 4 4 5 14 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 28% 32% 17% 22% 269 121 59 89 37% 39% 37% 30% 389 156 116 117 24% 21% 33% 31% 298 84 97 117 8% 6% 11% 13% 125 30 31 64 3% 2% 2% 5% 32 8 5 19 In my county… we have affordable childcare options * Select Demographics Don't Know/Refusal Total Sex Party Bachelor's Degree In my county… there is distrust of local government * Select Demographics In my county… there is distrust of local government * County In my county… we have affordable childcare options * County Total County Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal Age Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Race/Ethnicity Age Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/Refusal Don't Know/Refusal Total Sex Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Party Total County Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree
In my county… people can discuss politics openly and objectively across different political ideologies
Disagree
Disagree In the past five years, have people in your immediate family living in Northeast Florida… served on the board of directors for local nonprofits organizations
In my county… people can discuss politics openly and objectively across different political ideologies * County In the past five years, have people in your immediate family living in Northeast Florida… served on the board of directors for local nonprofits organizations * County
Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 14% 9% 17% 14% 17% 15% 13% 14% 15% 12% 17% 20% 12% 17% 16% 13% 13% 13% 12% 182 37 88 26 24 84 98 116 65 120 25 31 4 35 30 27 26 22 41 35% 34% 38% 34% 31% 38% 32% 35% 35% 35% 35% 30% 38% 41% 35% 34% 29% 30% 42% 371 88 167 62 48 149 214 240 130 269 49 32 17 61 72 59 47 46 86 27% 31% 25% 25% 28% 25% 30% 28% 26% 29% 25% 24% 23% 20% 24% 31% 32% 31% 25% 297 91 108 55 40 91 204 191 106 216 34 32 13 47 44 59 45 49 53 22% 24% 18% 25% 21% 20% 23% 22% 22% 22% 20% 24% 23% 20% 25% 21% 24% 25% 17% 237 76 75 48 33 72 161 154 83 174 26 23 11 44 38 43 32 39 40 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% 3% 3% 5% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 5% 26 6 12 2 4 12 14 18 7 14 5 4 3 4 2 3 2 2 13 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 14% 13% 14% 18% 182 54 42 86 35% 36% 37% 33% 371 140 105 126 27% 27% 30% 24% 297 110 91 96 22% 23% 18% 21% 237 89 67 81 2% 1% 1% 5% 26 6 3 17 Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 10% 13% 11% 7% 8% 10% 11% 9% 14% 9% 12% 18% 10% 19% 12% 10% 8% 8% 7% 132 45 58 14 12 45 84 65 67 82 17 26 6 32 25 27 15 14 19 80% 79% 83% 80% 75% 80% 81% 80% 80% 83% 75% 77% 76% 64% 73% 81% 85% 87% 84% 879 228 367 158 109 323 548 575 302 645 101 89 36 126 139 150 127 138 197 9% 8% 7% 11% 17% 9% 8% 11% 6% 8% 13% 4% 13% 15% 15% 8% 6% 5% 8% 95 24 24 17 28 37 55 74 20 62 20 6 5 31 21 13 9 6 15 1% <1% <1% 2% - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% <1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 7 1 1 4 0 3 4 5 2 4 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 2 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 10% 10% 11% 10% 132 47 37 48 80% 79% 82% 80% 879 308 247 324 9% 10% 7% 9% 95 43 22 30 1% <1% 1% 2% 7 1 2 4 County Strongly
Race/Ethnicity Age Strongly
Somewhat
Total Total County
No Don't Know/Don't Remember Refusal Race/Ethnicity Age Party Party Sex Bachelor's Degree Strongly Disagree
Agree
Agree
Agree
* Select Demographics
* Select Demographics Total Sex Bachelor's Degree Total Don't Know/Don't Remember Refusal Somewhat
Somewhat
Don't Know/Refusal Yes Don't Know/Refusal Yes No
Somewhat
Strongly
Agree
Disagree
Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 38% 41% 38% 37% 24% 40% 36% 33% 48% 35% 43% 45% 40% 41% 38% 41% 43% 35% 32% 440 127 184 79 42 170 268 244 196 298 63 57 19 89 71 70 64 61 85 53% 50% 55% 50% 60% 51% 55% 56% 46% 57% 45% 45% 49% 39% 51% 52% 49% 59% 61% 568 139 240 95 82 197 363 393 173 428 58 51 24 64 98 105 77 89 133 9% 8% 6% 11% 16% 9% 8% 10% 5% 7% 12% 9% 10% 18% 11% 6% 7% 6% 7% 97 29 24 17 25 39 55 75 21 61 17 13 5 36 16 14 10 7 14 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% <1% 1% - 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% <1% 8 3 2 2 0 2 5 7 1 6 1 1 0 2 1 2 1 1 1 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 38% 35% 45% 37% 440 144 148 148 53% 55% 48% 53% 568 213 135 220 9% 10% 7% 8% 97 41 23 33 1% <1% 1% 2% 8 1 2 5 Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 32% 36% 30% 29% 32% 30% 34% 30% 37% 29% 41% 36% 30% 37% 37% 36% 31% 33% 21% 370 109 147 62 43 127 239 222 147 251 54 47 15 69 65 72 49 55 59 56% 52% 61% 54% 54% 58% 53% 57% 53% 57% 49% 57% 58% 43% 52% 56% 56% 57% 64% 590 144 258 103 76 228 356 390 198 424 69 63 27 80 102 100 81 82 144 12% 12% 9% 15% 14% 12% 12% 13% 10% 13% 10% 6% 13% 18% 10% 8% 13% 10% 14% 147 43 44 26 30 52 92 102 45 113 16 11 6 40 18 18 21 20 30 1% 1% <1% 1% - <1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% - 2% 1% <1% 1% 1%6 2 1 2 0 1 4 5 1 5 0 1 0 2 1 1 1 1 0 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 32% 32% 31% 33% 370 137 100 133 56% 58% 53% 52% 590 219 152 219 12% 10% 16% 15% 147 42 54 51 1% <1% 1% 1% 6 1 2 3 Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Age Yes No Yes No Refusal Total Don't Know/Don't Remember In the past five years, have people in your immediate family living in Northeast Florida… referred others to receive services from a local nonprofit organization * Select Demographics In the past five years, have people in your immediate family living in Northeast Florida… volunteered at local nonprofits organizations * County Yes No Don't Know/Don't Remember Refusal Party In the past five years, have people in your immediate family living in Northeast Florida… volunteered at local nonprofits organizations * Select Demographics Total Sex Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Age Total County Yes No Don't Know/Don't Remember Refusal Total County Party Don't Know/Don't Remember Refusal In the past five years, have people in your immediate family living in Northeast Florida… referred others to receive services from a local nonprofit organization * County Sex
In the past five years, have people in your immediate family living in Northeast Florida… received services from a local nonprofit organization
past five years, have people in your immediate family living in Northeast Florida… received services from a local nonprofit organization
Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 25% 28% 20% 25% 28% 22% 27% 26% 21% 19% 37% 34% 26% 29% 30% 32% 21% 26% 13% 269 82 93 48 40 89 176 185 83 160 52 45 11 54 55 58 33 37 32 65% 61% 74% 64% 56% 69% 63% 62% 72% 71% 49% 58% 67% 52% 59% 59% 68% 70% 76% 721 178 329 121 80 279 436 444 275 550 66 66 31 95 113 115 103 112 181 10% 11% 7% 11% 15% 9% 11% 11% 6% 9% 14% 8% 7% 17% 11% 9% 10% 4% 10% 116 35 27 23 28 38 75 85 31 77 20 11 6 39 17 17 15 8 20 1% 1% <1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% <1% - - 2% 1% <1% 1% 1%7 3 1 1 1 2 4 5 2 6 1 0 0 3 1 1 1 1 0 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 25% 26% 17% 25% 269 108 61 100 65% 63% 72% 66% 721 246 208 267 10% 10% 10% 8% 116 43 37 36 1% 1% 1% 1% 7 2 2 3 Dem Rep NPA/Oth Not Reg M F No Yes White Afr Am/Black Hisp Other 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ n=1,113 n=298 n=450 n=193 n=149 n=408 n=691 n=719 n=391 n=793 n=139 n=122 n=48 n=191 n=186 n=191 n=152 n=158 n=233 18% 23% 13% 19% 14% 19% 17% 16% 22% 15% 24% 24% 24% 29% 22% 19% 14% 16% 11% 200 70 67 38 21 86 111 116 84 127 34 26 12 54 42 32 25 22 25 72% 67% 79% 69% 70% 71% 72% 71% 72% 76% 64% 68% 63% 50% 66% 71% 76% 77% 82% 793 195 349 136 98 282 503 513 278 587 86 83 29 96 126 139 114 125 191 10% 9% 8% 11% 15% 10% 10% 12% 6% 9% 12% 9% 14% 18% 12% 10% 9% 7% 8% 111 29 33 17 29 38 71 83 27 71 18 13 7 36 17 19 12 10 17 1% 1% <1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% <1% - - 3% 1% <1% 1% 1%9 4 1 2 1 2 6 7 2 8 1 0 0 5 1 1 1 1 0 Duval St. Johns Baker/Clay /Nassau n=1,113 n=399 n=308 n=406 18% 17% 17% 17% 200 74 56 70 72% 72% 74% 73% 793 277 220 296 10% 11% 9% 9% 111 45 29 37 1% 1% 1% 1% 9 3 3 3
* Select Demographics Bachelor's Degree Race/Ethnicity Age Sex Yes No Don't Know/Don't Remember Refusal Refusal Total Sex Bachelor's Degree Total County Yes No Don't Know/Don't Remember Refusal In the past five years, have people
your immediate family
Northeast Florida…
local nonprofit organization * Select Demographics In
County Yes No Don't Know/Don't Remember Refusal Party Party Yes No Don't Know/Don't Remember Total Race/Ethnicity Age In the
five
* County Total County
in
living in
worked for a
the
*
past
years, have people in your immediate family living in Northeast Florida… worked for a local nonprofit organization
62% 793 20% 139 9% 122 8% 48 1% 11 47% 408 52% 691 1% 9 1% 5 11% 191 19% 186 16% 191 16% 152 17% 158 20% 233 <1% 2 4% 49 43% 414 22% 256 21% 263 10% 128 <1% 3 Less than high school degree High school graduate/GED Currently in college or has AA degree Bachelor's degree (B.A. or B.S.) Gradeuate degree or postgraduate degree Don't Know/Refusal 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Don't Know/Refusal What is the highest grade in school or year of college you have completed? Total n=1,113 Total n=1,113 Male Female I use another term Don't Know/Refusal Which of the following categories best describes your age? Total n=1,113 What is your racial/ethnic background? Total n=1,113 White Black/African-American Hispanic/Latino Other Don't Know/Refusal What is your gender identity?
27% 329 72% 772 1% 12 17% 181 27% 285 21% 230 13% 151 10% 122 3% 38 5% 49 4% 57 43% 476 7% 74 13% 144 3% 26 33% 367 1% 17 1% 9 44% 428 55% 668 2% 17 90% 958 9% 149 1% 6 38% 450 39% 298 22% 193 2% 17 Under what political party are you registered? Total n=958 Republican Democrat NPA/Other Don't Know/Refusal Rent Own Don't Know/Refusal Are you registered to vote in the state of Florida? Total n=1,113 Yes No Don't Know/Refusal [Respondents who siad they are registered to vote] Widowed Divorced Separated Single(never married) Something else Don't Know/Refusal Do you rent or own your home? Total n=1,113 $75,000-$99,999 $100,000-$149,000 $150,000-$199,000 $200,000 or more Don't Know/Refusal What is your current marital status? Total n=1,113 Married Yes No Don't Know/Refusal What is your annual household income? Total n=1,113 Under $25,000 $25,000-$49,999 $50,000-$74,999 Are you the parent or guardian of a child under 18? Total n=1,113
