Exercise 5: Review and evaluation of local responses
Developing an example of an impact chain at the start of the module might help participants differentiate between direct and indirect impacts as they fill out the tables of impacts and local responses. See Annex V for an example of an impact chain exercise.
Sustainability and effectiveness depend on context. There is no absolute right or wrong ranking, but facilitators need to ask probing questions to ensure a good understanding of the concepts of effectiveness and sustainability used for this exercise. It is important to take time during preparation of the PACDR analysis to find a good and meaningful translation of the terms sustainability and effectiveness into the local language.
In this exercise, participants complete a matrix that lists hazards, their related impacts on livelihoods and the local responses that people in the community currently use to lessen the negative impacts. Facilitators then guide the participants in the evaluation of these responses.
Facilitation Facilitators provide pencils or markers in multiple colours and sheets of paper at least 80 cm x 100 cm in size. Facilitators prepare these sheets in advance in a matrix (see sample below). Facilitators select the two or three hazards with the strongest effects on livelihood resources from the vulnerability matrix created in Exercise 4, and write the first hazard in the matrix. Participants then identify the direct negative impacts of this hazard, and the facilitators list the impacts in the second column. The third column lists the strategies or practices the participants report that they or someone else in the community use in response to this impact. As each response is added to the matrix, participants evaluate the responses on the effectiveness of the measures (column four) and their sustainability (column five) by ranking the measures on the following scale: +++ = High ++ = Medium + = Low 0 = Not effective or not sustainable Participants work across the matrix, completing the responses to each impact and the rankings before moving on to the next impact. Facilitators may help participants understand the differences between hazards and their direct and indirect impacts. Hazards may include droughts and storms, for example. Their direct impacts include crop and property damage; indirect impacts may include hunger and loss of income. If the participants include an indirect impact in the matrix, they may find that the development of adaptation strategies in Module 5 is more difficult and less straightforward than the development of strategies related to direct impacts such as crop losses. The ranking for effectiveness answers the question of how well the response is working to deal with the identified impact, and the ranking for sustainability answers the question of whether the response will work in the long term without compromising other aspects of livelihoods.
28 Responses to the impacts of hazards
Module
4
