Self Assessment Feedback Form – BA(Hons) Fashion Buying Student Name ….Sharelle Sweeney Module ……FBUY1002 Digital Workbench Module leader…………Karen Hickinbotham Module tutor…...………Alis Iacob
Assignment Title – Assessme nt componen t weighting
Marking Criteria
Research of garment shapes
100-90% Grade A*
89-80% Grade A+
79-70% Grade A
69-60% Grade B
59-50% Grade C
49-40% Grade D
39-30% Grade F
29-0% Grade F
20%
Quality of outline shape, including details
30%
Quality of filled shapes and appropriateness to research
30%
Quality of layout throughout and impact of home page
20%
Please refer to the sheet below to understand your grade in reference to the Fashion & textiles mark descriptors. Where I could improve.
Signed By…Alis Iacob……….. Date …………….. Overall Mark %…subject to PAB Should you wish to discuss your feedback please see the marking tutor
Fashion & Textiles Mark Descriptors 70-79% 60-69%
90-100%
80-89%
Fulfils all the assessment criteria for the module component at an exceptional level
Fulfils all the assessment criteria for the module component at an outstanding level
Fulfils all the assessment criteria for the module component at an authoritative level
Displays exceptional degree of originality and/or
Displays high degree of originality and/or creativity.
Extremely well developed work showing a clear and
50-59%
Fulfils the assessment criteria for the module component thoroughly
Fulfils assessment criteria for the module component effectively
Demonstrates a thorough grasp of the relevant theories, concepts,
Demonstrates evidence of an effective grasp of relevant material, principles,
creativity. Exceptional analytical, problem-solving and/or creative skills. No fault can be found with the work other than very minor errors, omissions or limitations.
Work of outstanding quality, evidenced by an ability to engage critically, analytically and creatively. Exhibits independent lines of argument and /or practice. Demonstrates extremely wide and relevant contextual understanding.
authoritative understanding of the subject through its practice, interpretation or application. Demonstrates significant originality, creativity and/or insight. Significant evidence of ability to sustain an argument and/or concept, to think analytically, critically and/or creatively. Evidence of extensive study and appropriate contextual understanding and where applicable draws on an appropriate range of properly referenced sources. Achieves an excellent standard of technical accomplishment.
40-49%
Fulfils the assessment criteria for the module component at a Basic level A response demonstrating an understanding of basic points and principles sufficient to show that some of the learning outcomes/ assessment have been achieved at a basic level. Suitable organised concepts and /or work demonstrating a reasonable level of understanding. Covers the basic subject mater and is appropriately presented but is clearly derivative and insufficiently analytical. Demonstrate limited conceptual ability, level of evaluation and creative skills. Demonstrates adherence to the referencing conventions appropriate to the subject or/ and task. Limited technical skills.
30-39% Fail
20-29% Fail
Overall insufficient fulfilment of the assessment criteria for the module component.
Overall insufficient fulfilment of the assessment criteria for the module component.
A weak response, which, while addressing some elements of the task, contains significant gaps, inaccuracies or deficiencies.
A poor response, which falls substantially short of achieving the learning outcomes.
Shows only weakly developed elements of understanding and/or other skills appropriate to the task. May contain significant weaknesses in presentation.
Demonstrates little knowledge and/or other skills appropriate to the task Little evidence of argument and/or coherent use of material
principles, methods, and practices. Clear evidence of concept development and critical judgement in making, selecting, ordering, analysing and presenting. Demonstrates ability to synthesise material, to construct responses and demonstrate creative skills which reveal insight and may offer originality. Shows evidence of appropriate contextual understanding, and where applicable draws on an appropriate range of properly referenced sources. Demonstrates a good standard of technical accomplishment.
10-19% Fail
Overall insufficient fulfilment of the assessment criteria for the module component. A very poor response demonstrating little relevant understanding. Displays only isolated or no knowledge and/or other skills appropriate to the task. Little adherence to the task
key concepts and practices. An ability to develop and progress a concept/argument and develop reflective practices. Demonstrates an appropriate degree of creativity, conceptual ability, critical analysis and insight. Accurate, clearly written/presented and adheres to the referencing conventions appropriate to the subject and/or task. Contextual understanding is evident. Some limitations in the attainment of technical skills.
0-9%
Fail
Overall insufficient fulfilment of the assessment criteria for the module component. Displays virtually no knowledge and/or other skills appropriate to the task. Work is inappropriate to assessment task given