The Great Divide: AI-Assisted Art vs Traditional Art - Part 3

The Challenge of Proving Originality

By Dallas Fowler

The final segment of this series delves into a critical aspect of working with AI art: authenticity. As we continue navigating the realm of AI art alongside traditional art, questions about authenticity are bound to surface. This issue presents two distinct paths.

The first involves the challenge of proving that one’s original artwork is not generated solely by AI. The second path pertains to artists or prompters asserting that AI-generated art is their original work.

The more articles I read about copyright issues with assisted art, the more I find myself considering arguments from both sides. Recently, I came across an article featuring a gentleman named Ben Moran. His profile was muted, and his artwork was removed from a site because a moderator didn’t believe he actually painted the piece. Surprisingly, the moderator accused him of using AI-generated art as a reference. What’s intriguing about this authenticity mishap is that the artist’s creativity was so extraordinary that the website moderator automatically assumed it was AI-generated. Here’s the link if you want to read more about it.

https://www.parkablogs.com/content/ how-prove-your-art-not-ai-generated

1. the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power

So, let’s dive into the first challenge: proving that my original artwork is not generated by AI. I believe the key to safeguarding our artwork as we navigate this landscape of originality is meticulous documentation of the creation process. This entails saving various examples of artwork creation, from initial sketches to progress photos taken along the way, and possibly recording a time-lapse video of the artwork’s creation. As artists, we understand that even if we incorporate elements from stock art, our original creations always entail multiple layers in our working program. Personally, I have utilized AI-generated art for creating textures and backgrounds that I might use in a particular piece of art. I view using AI in this manner similarly to purchasing a photo from Shutterstock or Auroragraphics.net – I use it as clip art or a background fill, enhancing the work I’m creating, but it is not the sole subject of the piece. Additionally, I enjoy using AI to quickly capture snapshots of ideas or to create pieces for use on a mood board. It’s a valuable tool for rapidly exploring concepts and visualizing the direction of a project. These AI-generated elements serve as building blocks in the creative process, aiding in the development and refinement of ideas before committing to the final artwork. universally accepted definition of art may remain elusive, the discourse surrounding this topic is rich and diverse. Artists, critics, scholars, and enthusiasts all contribute their perspectives, leading to a multifaceted understanding of what art stands for. Some emphasize the expression of emotion and creativity, while others focus on the exploration of beauty, aesthetics, or social commentary. Additionally, the evolution of technology and the emergence of new artistic mediums, such as AI-generated art, add further complexity to this ongoing conversation. Ultimately, the meaning of art remains subjective and open to interpretation, reflecting the diverse experiences and perspectives of humanity.

Now, let’s examine the second challenge of proving AI-generated art versus original artwork. There are purists who believe that art must be created using traditional tools such as pencils, paintbrushes, and pens, or digital formats like Adobe Photoshop. They assert their stance by defining what qualifies as true art in their eyes, dismissing AI-generated art as mere AI prompters. However, it’s worth noting that mastering AI programs and crafting specific prompts to achieve desired results also requires skill and time. As mentioned earlier, the main issue arises when individuals pass off AI-generated art as their own original work. This deception is compounded by the fact that artistic styles and possibly even images are sometimes used to generate AI art.

Many discussions within the art community often revolve around the fundamental question: what is the true meaning of art? While a simple,

After thorough study and consideration, I find myself empathizing with both sides of the argument. We must educate ourselves about the ever-evolving landscape of art continually. As time progresses, I expect a surge in appreciation for handcrafted art, while

AI-generated art may be perceived as a quick or cheap solution. Consequently, there is a possibility that the value of AI-generated art will diminish in comparison. I am also aware that as AI-generated art becomes more popular, so will the programs and technologies designed to protect one’s own original art from being copied by an AI generator. It’s important to note that much of what I’ve discussed over the past few months represents my current viewpoint and appreciation for the advancement of technology. These are simply my opinions. I encourage everyone to continually evolve, keep creating art, and protect their creations. But most importantly, remember to have fun, because at its core, art is about expression.

Hope these AI articles got you thinking, thanks for reading them.

Dallas Fowler

Dallas@digitalefxwraps.com

Co-Owner, Digital EFX Wraps LLC Creator, WrapToons