Avionics 2.qxp_Finance 18/02/2020 11:30 Page 2
AVBUYER.com
A
With a focused approach on global excellence and creativity, Andre Fodor has managed flight operations for the U.N. and Flight Options as well as being a senior demonstration pilot and instructor for Embraer Aircraft. He is the Aviation Director for his current employer.
Have avionics become so sophisticated that human factors don’t matter? How is the role of the pilot changing regarding best safety practices and eliminating human error in an increasingly simplified, digital cockpit? Andre Fodor shares insights… nnual recurrent training is an opportunity to recycle knowledge and skills. An annual review of systems dusts away cobwebs that may have settled over the previous twelve months. More importantly, it serves as a reminder that what’s happening ‘automagically’ behind the instrument panel is dependent on highly advanced aircraft systems and technology. While simulators give pilots the opportunity to toggle switches that otherwise gather dust thanks to the automation and high reliability of today’s cockpit, recurrent training also serves as a priceless opportunity to connect with other pilots and to hear of emerging trends and reallife lessons. Truth be told, it’s hardly surprising that most of these exchanges include mishaps that result from an over-reliance on technology and automation in today’s cockpit. One colleague who flies an older jet relayed a story of the time his crew was on a routine climb to the higher flight levels. The aircraft was hand-flown before the autopilot was engaged at 18,000ft. At that point the crew shifted their focus from scanning the primary instruments to discussing an upcoming trip. A few minutes into their conversation, they were surprised to see the aircraft’s stall warning system activate. Although they responded correctly and regained positive control of the airplane before they reached the stall envelope, to their surprise the autopilot had never captured, and they never procedurally confirmed autopilot engagement. This was a clear violation of procedure and could have yielded a bad outcome. The story
A
www.AVBUYER.com
also serves to highlight the continued importance of understanding how human factors affect the interface between man and machine. All phases of flight must be considered critical, regardless of how automated the cockpit seems. By developing SOPs (Standard Operational Procedures) that cover the transition of flight states, the levels of automation, and enhancing awareness during different flight phases, you will help enforce a solid interface between pilot and automation. In today’s highly automated and advanced cockpits, we must be vigilant, and be aware of how easily we can disconnect and be distracted from the business of flying the aircraft. It’s also imperative to understand what the aircraft will do when we engage systems. During an LPV/WAAS approach, for example, what are the annunciations that we should expect to see and hear outside the final approach fix, once the glideslope is intercepted? And, if a system malfunctions, or fails to behave as expected, what actions should be taken (either manually or automatically) to correct or abandon the approach?
Avionics & Automation: Staying in the Loop
During a conference held by one major business jet OEM, the concept of ‘Deviation from Normal’ was discussed, and the theme included how much the machine should attempt to manage system malfunctions before sharing with the crew that something is wrong. With monumental computing power already available in the cockpit, and artificial
AVBUYER MAGAZINE Vol 24 Issue 3 2020
99
1
