51
Unlocking the Economic Potentials of Mexican Cities
Box 3.3 Metropolitan Coordination and Governance in Mexico (continued) Table B3.3.1 Metropolitan Coordination Mechanisms in Mexico Metropolitan area
Fondo Metropolitanoa
Consejo de desarrollo Metropolitan spatial planning entity urbano metropolitano’b with municipal commitmentsc
Valle de México (Mexico City) Guadalajara
Y
Y
Y
N
Monterrey Puebla-Tlaxcala Toluca Tijuana Leon Juarez La Laguna Queretaro
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Y Y N Y Y N Y Y
San Luis Potosí
Y
N
N Y; 60% of ZM municipalities signatories N N N N N N N Y; 100% of the ZM municipalities signatories N
Note: N = no; Y = yes; ZM = zonas metropolitanas. a. SCHP 2015. b. As officially recognized and filed nationally. http://www3.diputados.gob.mx/camara/001_diputados/010_comisioneslxi/001_ordinarias/009_desarrollo _metropolitano/035_sedesol/003_instalacion_de_consejos_metropolitanos. c. Including specifically metropolitan-scale entities with agreements and dues from municipalities. Notably, many urban areas have recent metropolitan planning initiatives that are led out of the core municipality, such as Tijuana and Puebla and Queretaro. The core municipality of Toluca recently established a citizen council for metropolitan planning, although it appears to be primarily consultative and expert-based. In others, the state government(s) are leading a metropolitan planning effort, such as in the Valle de México. a. http://pem2034.herobo.com/objetivos-y-alcances-del-plan-pem2034.php.
350
30
300
20
250
10
200
0
150
–10
100
–20
50
–30 –40
0 1990
1995 Monterrey
Oaxaca
2000
2005
Monterrey growth
2010
Oaxaca growth
Source: World Bank analysis based on economic census data from the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografia, INEGI).
Mexico Urbanization Review • http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0916-3
Productivity growth rate
Total productivity
Figure 3.9 Different Levels of Labor Productivity and Productivity Growth in Monterrey and Oaxaca, 1990–2010