=133=
the Constitution of 1972, because the entire population of the country wanted the victory to ‘Bangalee Nationalism’ and as such, inscription of this phrase in their sacred Constitution reflected
the
contended
overwhelming
will
of
the
people.
Mr.Islam
that although it was Zia who ejected this phrases
from our Copnstitution, General Ershad is no less to blame as he continued with it, We could not agree more. The whole world knows that we fought our War of Liberation to hold the flag of ‘Bangalee Nationalism’ high. It is also true that everyone in Bangladesh, including all ethnic people, who also speak in Bangla, fought valiantly for the liberation of Bangladesh. They are Bangalees too. Mr.Islam thought a clear message should be transmitted from this Court in this respect. This
question
found
a
for
place
consideration
in
the
Appellate Division at the time the Fifth Amendment Case was being considered. It was viewed by the Appellate Division that return
to
‘Bangalee
expenditure
and
Nationalism,’
changes
have
to
now, be
would
involve
recorded
in
all
huge the
passports and other official documents, home and abroad. There is no doubt, and keeping in mind the question of expenses
as
nevertheless ‘Bangalee
viewed
by
gradually,
Nationalism’
the
Appellate
proceed in
our
to
Division,
eventually
Constitution,
we
bring
which
was
can back the
commitment of the historic War of Liberation and the cherished desire of the people and Bangabandhu himself. Mr.
Khasru,
with
all
earnestly
supplied
copies
of
Argentine and Mexican Constitution to depict the measures these countries have taken
in order to insulate their Constitution.