Center City "Planning to Stay" by William Marquez

Evansville, Indiana

September 11th, 2019

A COMMUNITY TOOL FOR THE FUTURE

TABLE OF CONTENTS FORWARD •

Planning to Stay by w/purpose ........................................................................ 3

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS SECTION A: OVERVIEW •

History and Community Narrative: Canal District ..........................................6-8

•

Canal District Boundaries................................................................................. 9

•

Key Corridors & Anchoring Institutions .......................................................... 10

•

District Profile .............................................................................................11-14

•

Parallel Initiatives & Local Organizations .................................................. 15-16

SECTION B: ANALYSIS •

Key Assets: Organizations & Institutions ....................................................... 18 •

Key Organizations, Schools, Community Centers, etc.

•

Key Assets: Snap Shot ............................................................................. 19-22

•

Attractions, Gateways & Connectivity .............................................................23

•

Existing Land Use & Zoning ..................................................................... 24-25

•

Existing Transportation Routes ...................................................................... 26

SECTION C: COMMUNITY STRATEGY •

Big Picture Strategy ....................................................................................... 28

•

Community Strategy .......................................................................................29

•

Process for Revitalization................................................................................30

•

Towards “Planning to Stay” - (5) Pillars ....................................................32-36

SECTION D: SCENARIO PLANNING •

Scenario Planning Strategy ............................................................................ 39

•

Scenario Planning: The Process .................................................................... 40 • Scenario A - Business Corridor .............................................................. 41-46 • Scenario B - Re-Align Grid ..................................................................... 47-52

SECTION E: ERSI DATA •

ERSI DATA......................... .......................................................................53-99

FORWARD

PLANNING TO STAY? Are you planning to stay? This was the initial question we presented to the Center City in December 2018. Our purpose was to begin a conversation and process that was not just about the future of where you live, but a way of seeing a neighborhood, its unique story, and legacy. This document is intended to give area residents a way forward with organizational and visual tools that will: A. Offer a pathway to organize and further prioritize equitable outcomes for residents of historically marginalized community B. Provide a glimpse into the concept of an economic corridor or district. The plan would include place-making features, future neighborhood branding and related pedestrian focused infrastructure. The plan looks to inspire a regional showcase and destination. C. Highlight the physical assets, maps, data, and institutions critical to exploring the possibilities around involvement advocacy and inspiring a community In a packed meeting room at Memorial Baptist Church, participants had the opportunity to assess where they thought their community stood if given the following options below. While the overall consensus in the room was grim (noted by the star), this workbook looks to inspire and invite new voices to help move the needle towards realizing the type of results necessary to build a future the community and city could be proud of. Finally, the focus of this document is not necessarily on the new residents of tomorrow, but instead to acknowledge those who have made a commitment to stay in the Center City today and for years to come. We hope this workbook will help guide discussions, open minds, inspire philanthropy, and advance the physical environment for the Center City community in Evansville, Indiana.

DISCONNECTED & DISCOURAGED

CONNECTED & COORDINATED

ALIGNED & ACTING

REALIZING RESULTS

Wil D Marquez w/purpose, llc

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Memorial Community Development Corporation Rev. Pastor Adrian Brooks Sr., Pastor Memorial Baptist Church

605 Canal St. Evansville, IN 47713

Serita Cabell, Executive Director Memorial Community Development Corporation Rasheedah Ajibade, Program Development Director Memorial Community Development Corporation

W/Purpose, LLC urban + public design

www.wpurpose.com

Wil Marquez, Principal Alejandra Lagunas, Project Manager Matt DeLoughery, Design Associate Daniel Blondet, GIS/Planning Intern

Special Thanks: To Memorial Community Development Corporation, Evansville Vanderburgh Public Library, African American Museum, Center City stakeholders, business owners, property owners, and residents for participating in helping us with this document. Special thanks to artist/photographer Tieshka K. Smith. The input and feedback were a tremendous value for the results presented in this document. Special acknowledgment to William Rees Morrish for his mentorship and book - Planning To Stay (ISBN-10: 157131203X) which was a tremendous help and guide in our process.

OVERVIEW

HISTORY & COMMUNITY NARRATIVE: CANAL DISTRICT Revival Rooted in History

JULY 6, 2017 BY INDIANA LANDMARKS

In 1938, Evansville held the largest concentration of African Americans in southern Indiana, with the majority of its black residents living in an area known as Baptisttown. Following the Civil War, African Americans crossed the Ohio River in search of a better life and settled around Liberty Baptist Church at 7th and Oak streets in Evansville. As migrants and immigrants settled primarily around the church, the area became known as “Baptist Town.” The majority of the black population settled and congregated near the now defunct W&E Canal where roughly 44% of Evansville black population centered at 8th and Canal. Liberty Baptist is the oldest extant black congregation in Evansville today. Founded by former slaves in 1865, Liberty Baptist’s congregation built the areas first Gothic Revivalstyle church in 1886 after a tornado destroyed the original building. The church provided leadership in the religious, social, and political life of the city’s black community. This historic site was a meeting place for the African-American neighborhood of Baptisttown and organizing center for African-Americans in their 115 year struggle for Civil Rights in Evansville. The unique landmark remains a church today.

“Built in 1927 and opened in 1928, Lincoln School was the largest African American school in Evansville and the only school in Evansville to serve the city’s Afro-American community.”

The community thrived in the early twentieth century as residents created their own schools, churches, civic clubs, hospital, and stores. Lincoln High School (still standing today), the city’s first and primary black school was built in 1927 and opened in 1928, Lincoln School was the largest African American school in Evansville and the only school in Evansville to serve the city’s AfroAmerican community. In an effort to combat poor housing conditions in the 1930s, the community petitioned and organized for federal housing. Eleanor Roosevelt

Photo Source| http://www.historicevansville.com

DISCOVER BAPTISTTOWN Lake Mickigan

presided over the 1938 grand opening of Lincoln Gardens, the second federal housing project built under FDR’s New Deal. By the ‘90s, Lincoln Gardens faced demolition. Sondra Matthews, editor and publisher of Evansville’s Our Times Newspaper, organized a group to buy one of the apartment buildings from Evansville Housing Authority for $1. Re-purposed as Evansville African American Museum, the site tells the Baptisttown story and highlights the African American culture in Evansville through interactive exhibits, talks, live performances, and special events. One room remains outfitted as an apartment to allow visitors a glimpse of Lincoln Gardens’ heyday.

INDIANA Indianapolis

Today, the area has fallen to population decline, disinvestment, and a variety of social ills ranging from homelessness to addiction. A new event spearheaded by the Evansville African American Museum, Memorial Baptist Church, and others marks an inaugural Baptist-Town Festival which hopes to build local pride and lead an urban revival movement.

LOUISVILLE

EVANSVILLE OWENSBORO

Fig. 01| Regional Map. The City of Evansville sits on the Ohio River.

PROPOSED BOUNDARY

EVANSVILLE NEIGHBORHOODS: OLD ERIE, OLD TOWN, BELLEMEADE PARK, CENTER CITY, & BAPTISTTOWN

CITY OF EVANSVILLE LIMITS OH

Fig.02| 1962 Sandborn Insurance Map - Representing local neighborhood around Lincoln High School

R IV

Fig. 03| A proposed economic improvement district (shaded dark grey) will

DISCOVER BAPTISTTOWN Rediscovering “Baptistown”: A Historical Geography Project on Local African American History Tamara L. Hunt and Donovan Weight University of Southern Indiana and Texas A&M International University

Although the Lincoln Gardens project was small compared to some of the other federal housing projects funded by the Roosevelt administration, it was still a major undertaking; it required the purchase of all the property on approximately four square blocks, razing the existing buildings, and temporarily relocating the residents. Construction began in June 1937, and when

for adults. Lincoln High School opened in 1928 as the city’s only black high school, was located directly across the street from the project. During the war, Lincoln Gardens would also be the site for what served as an unofficial USO for black soldiers. With the area’s only African American high school and newspaper, and the newly opened quality housing for lowincome families, Baptistown was revitalized and became the hub of black society in segregated southwestern Indiana in the late 1930s and 1940s. The local community witnessed the increase in the number of black owned businesses, professionals, and service providers.

Fig. 04| Evansville Vanderburgh Public Library and the Evansville African American Museum have historic maps and helpful resources.

the first residents moved in during the following summer, Lincoln Gardens became only the second federal housing project to open. While some other housing projects displaced minority communities to provide housing for low-income white residents, Lincoln Gardens remained at the heart of a vibrant African American community. The housing gala opening took place on July 1, 1938, and was an important moment for Baptistown. The Evansville Argus, founded a month earlier as the city’s only African American newspaper, reported on the event, and according to the project’s housing manager, the 191 new units would “elevate the social and economic status of the community.” It would also serve as a community center, with meeting rooms and classes

“With the area’s only African American high school and newspaper, and the newly opened quality housing for low-income families, Baptistown was revitalized and became the hub of black society in segregated southwestern Indiana in the late 1930s and 1940s. The local community witnessed the increase in the number of black-owned businesses, professionals, and service providers” FULL RESEARCH PAPER & CITATIONS BY HUNT/WRIGHT www.societyforhistoryeducation.org/pdfs/M18_Hunt_and_Weight.pdf

CANAL DISTRICT GEOGRAPHIC LIMITS

NORTH MAIN STREET DISTRICT

JACOBSVILLE JACOBSVILLE

PROPOSED DISTRICT BOUNDARY CANAL STREET

EVANSVILLE DOWNTOWN & CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

OLD ERIE

IST

RN CO S â&#x20AC;&#x2122; IE

SD RT

OLDE TOWN

CENTER CITY

T RIC

YN HA

BAPTISTTOWN

GOOSETOWN

BELLEMEADE BAYARD PARK

TEPE PARK Fig. 05| Map of Downtown Evansville, including proposed Canal District limits.

KEY CORRIDORS & ANCHORING INSTITUTIONS

Lloyd Expressway

MEMORIAL BAPTIST CHURCH

NAZARENE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH

T LU IN

WALNUT STREET

HE G

RK NEW HOPE BAPTIST CHURCH

LIBERTY BAPTIST CHURCH

S. KENTUCKY AVENUE

8TH STREET

Key Corridors

S. GARVIN STREET

Parks

S. GOVERNOR STREET

KEY

LINCOLN AVENUE

Key Faith Centers & program stakeholders

WASHINGTON AVENUE

Fig. 6.0 | To untap the districtâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s economic and quality of place initiatives; further advocacy and collaboration from leading anchoring institutions (Ministries, Non profits, banks) will be vital.

COMMUNITY DISTRICT BOUNDARY PROFILE PROFILE Population of Proposed Boundary Population is projected to decrease

4,839 by 2023

5,140

4,886

2000

2018

According to the U.S Census Bureau

DOMINANT TAPESTRY MAP 47713/47714 Occupied Housing Units Summary

25.7% Vacant

31.6%

those age 15 - 24 are

those age 15 - 24 will be

Owner Occupied WALNUT

13.7%

13.1%

of the population, and

age 25 - 34 are

LINCOLN

Renter Occupied

KENTUCKY

GOVERNOR

42.7%

13.8%

14 %

of the population

age 55 - 64 are

12.2%

CENTER CITY 11.6% LIFEMODE 2018 of the population

TAPESTRY of the population

L09 SENIOR STYLES *FIVE YEAR PROJECTION FOR POPULATION

L11 MIDTOWN SINGLES

$58,100

L12 HOMETOWN

TOP 5 industries

2023

in the area

in the area, compare to

8.9% 5.6%

for all U.S.

5.2% Construction

Health Care & Social Assistance

19.7% 13.1%

Public Administration

2018

Professional, Scientific & Tech Services

$26,572

L08 MIDDLE GROUND

Retail Trade

MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary. Esri converted Census 2000 Data into 2010 geography. Fig. 7.0 | ERSI Tapestry Segmentation listings for the United States & how the Center City area is catergorized

Population is projected to decrease

4,839 by 2023

5,140BOUNDARY PROFILE 4,886 DISTRICT 2000

2018

Occupied Housing Units Summary

25.7%

31.6%

Vacant

Owner Occupied

According to the U.S Census Bureau

VACANT HOUSING ON THE RISE OPPORTUNITY OR CHALLENGE? 720those age 15 - 24 are

those age 15 - 24 will be

13.7%

13.1%

670 of the population, and

of the population, and

621

620age 25 - 34 are

age 25 - 34 are

13.8%

14 %

of the population 535

of the population

520age 55 - 64 are

age 55 - 64 are

42.7%

12.2%

Renter Occupied

of the population 2010

11.6% of the population 2023

2018

*FIVE YEAR PROJECTION FOR POPULATION

FOR SALE

in the area, compare to SOLD FOR SALE

200 93

for all U.S.

1,199 5.6% in the area

UTILITY GAS

19.7% 13.1% ELECTRIC

SOLAR

8.9%

616 0

5.2% Construction

2018

Retail Trade

FOR REN

Health Care & Social Assistance

$26,572

TOP 5 industries

2023

Public Administration

INCOME

2014 OCCUPIED HOUSING BY HEATING SOURCE

Professional, Scientific & Tech Services

MEDIAN

Vacant Housing in Canal District 2010 HOUSEHOLD $58,100

SOLD, BUT NOT OCCUPIED

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary. Esri converted Census 2000 Data into 2010 geography.

???????? OTHER V ACANT

200

Fig. 8.0 | ERSI Household Data tells us a lot about where we live. How can a local organization or team tackle the housing numbers??

Owner Occupied

Owner Owner 13.7%

13.7% 13.1% 13.7%

Occupied and of theOccupied population,

of ofof the the population, population, and and the population, and

age 25 - 34 are

age age 25 2525 --34 34 are areare age - 34

13.8%

42.7% Renter MEDIANOccupied HOUSEHOLD

13.8% 14 % 13.8%

of the population

of ofof the the population population the population

age 55 - 64 are

age age 55 5555 --64 64 are areare age - 64

42.7% 42.7% 12.2%

12.2% 11.6% 12.2%

2018 INCOME CANAL DISTRICT VS. UNITED STATES & CITY OF EVANSVILLE

ofRenter the population Renter Occupied Occupied

of ofof the the population population the population

*FIVE YEAR PROJECTION FOR POPULATION

$36,956 2017 $26,572 $26,572 2018 2018

in the area, compare Canal District Areato

in in the area, compare for all U.S.toto the area, for City ofcompare Evansville

TOP 5 industries

2023 2023 2018

in the area

5.6% 13.1 5.2 8.9% 13. 19.7% 13.1% 19.7% 19.7% Health Care & Social Assistance

2018

$58,100 $58,100

forfor allall U.S. U.S.

Professional, Scientific & Tech Services Health Care & Social Assistance Health Care & Social Assistance Public Administration

$26,572

MEDIAN MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD HOUSEHOLD $58,100 INCOME INCOME 2023

Retail Trade

MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME

*FIVE YEAR PROJEC *FIVE YEAR PRO

Retail Trade

Vacant Vacant

Construction

Vacant

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census Source: 2010 U.S. Census Summary. Bureau, Esri converted Census 2010 Census Summary. 2000 Data Esri converted into 2010Census geography. 2000 Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary. Esri converted Census 2000 Da

2018 EXPECTED NUMBER OF ADULTS BANKING IN DISTRICT BEHAVIOR w/ LOCAL BANKS

Credit Union

Bank of America Wells Fargo Chase

582 15.8% 387 10.5% 325 8.8% 302 8.2%

Local Bank 250 6.8% Capital One 145 3.9% PNC 123 3.3%

Fig. 9.0 | ERSI Market Potential tells us a lot about how we shop and spend our dollars. How can local financiing help residents?

13.8%

14 %

of the population

age 55 - 64 are

42.7%

12.2%

11.6%

Renter Occupied

of the population

*FIVE YEAR PROJECTION FOR POPULATION 2018 TOP FIVE INDUSTRIES IN THE CANAL DISTRICT AREA

$58,100

TOP 5 industries

2023

in the area

Population is projected to decrease

for all U.S.

4,839

5.2% Construction

Population of Proposed Boundary

8.9% 5.6% Public Administration

Retail Trade

Health Care & Social Assistance

19.7% 13.1%

Professional, Scientific & Tech Services

COMMUNITY PROFILE

by 2023

4,886

2018 & 2023 POPULATION AGE GROUP COMPARISONS

Census 2010 Summary. Census 2000 Data into 2010 geography. According to the U.S Census Bureau 2018 Esri converted

Units Summary

31.6% Owner Occupied

those age 15 - 24 are

those age 15 - 24 will be

13.7%

13.1%

of the population, and

age 25 - 34 are

13.8%

14 %

of the population

age 55 - 64 are

42.7%

12.2%

11.6%

Renter Occupied

of the population

*FIVE YEAR PROJECTION FOR POPULATION

$58,100 2023

TOP 5 industries in the area

PARALLEL INITIATIVES & LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS Identifying tools, creative resources, & focused programs that operate in parallel with the neighborhoods needs is vital to a cohesive organizational movement. The following initiatives range in scale, mission, and purpose yet help balance the overall demand for activity and quality of life.

Fig. 10| Memorial Riverside Housing Groundbreaking 2014

ECO-ACE ENGINEERING GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT Focus:

Improving Evansvilleâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s storm water mitigation and green storm-water infrastructure (GSI) can restore healthy waterways and revitalize urban communities but requires a multi-disciplinary design approach informed by ecology, community, engineering, and long-term maintenance. #canal #water #sustainability #greeninfrastructure #bioswales #canaltrail

Mission: Collaborate with local organizations to create "green" soft infrastructure programs that would help improve communityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s environmental and economic needs.

#WHATSGOOD47713 Focus: A Year of Hip Hop (AYoHH) is an inquiry project funded by Evansville Vanderburgh Public Library and Foundation. It is an exploration of how we learn as a community. The project was designed to explore how educational opportunities could be improved through hip hop culture. #publicart #engagement #publiclibrary #placemaking #hiphop #communitybuilding #whatsgood47713 #tieshkasmith 15

PARALLEL INITIATIVES & LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS

BITS AND BYTES COMPUTER CLUB Focus:

Photo credit to @chrisbernekingproductions

The Bits and Bytes Computer Club is focused on helping guide youngsters to not only be consumers of technology, but also doers. B&B works with robots and software by learning to do coding, app-building, robot-programming, and more! This club opens doors for students and educates them on useful skills that often are not available at school. Leadership Everyone awarded founder Debbie Calhoun the Leadership in Technology Award in 2019. She hopes to expand the program by working with local schools. #STEAM #Robots #Technology # #leadershipeveryone #training

WALNUT STREET IMPROVEMENTS Focus:

The project involves rehabilitation of pavement, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. Improvements highlight the replacement of the north sidewalk with a multi-use trail for pedestrians and bicycles.

Mission:

Get Involved: David Goffinet, Lochmueller Group Public Involvement Coordinator (e) dgoffinet@lochgroup.com

Overalll, the improvements are identified as a â&#x20AC;&#x153;road dietâ&#x20AC;? by reducing the number of vehicular traffic lanes from 4 to 3, with 1 east-bound lane, 1 west-bound lane, and a center 2-way left turn lane. A new storm sewer system will be included along with the introduction of green infrastructure treatments to separate storm water from portions of the project that have combined storm and wastewater systems. #placemaking #urban garden #canalstreettrail #infrastructure #streetscape

EVV AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM Focus:

To celebrate the struggles, successes and experiences of the African American culture in Evansville over the past 80 years.

Mission: The Evansville African American Museum is a key resource and cultural center in the Center City that collects, preserves, and educates the public on the history of African American community. Recently they hosted a Heritage Walking Tour intended to celebrate and educate others about the Baptisttown architecture and culture. #culture #heritage

#museum #community #arts #exhibits #education #evansville Get Involved: https://evvafricanamericanmuseum.org/

Fig. 11| Lincoln Gardens Site - As part of one of the nationâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s first housing projects, Lincoln Gardens was built in 1938 under President Rooseveltâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s New Deal Program. The picture is a view of an area cleared for construction for the housing project. Photo Source| http://www.historicevansville.com

ANALYSIS

KEY ASSETS: ORGANIZATIONS & INSTITUTIONS

JOHN ST AL

N CA

METS MOBILITY TRANSPORTATION

OLIVE ST

EVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION ALEXANDER AME CHURCH WALNUT ST WALNUT ST

NEW HOPE BAPTIST CHURCH

MC FARLAND BAPTIST CHURCH CUT RATE MARKET LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL

EVANS AV CHANDLER AV

BAYARD PK DR BOOM SQUAD

BAYARD PARK

US 41 KERTH AV

EVPL EAST

MT. OLIVE GALILEE BAPTIST CHURCH POWELL AV STAR MEAT MARKET

MT ZION BAPTIST CHURCH BLACKFORD AV

SHALOM YESHUA MINISTRIES INC WASHINGTON AVE

GRAND AV

8TH ST

MASON BROTHERS MEMORIAL CHAPEL

GUM ST

ELLIOTT ST

LINE ST

MULBERRY ST

LINCOLN AVE

BELLEMEADE AV

LINE STREET CHURCH OF CHRIST

CHANDLER AV

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE

ST. JOHN’S CATHOLIC CHURCH

OSBORNE FUNERAL HOME LINE STREET PARK

FIRST EBENEZER BAPTIST CHURCH

KERTH AV

LIBERTY BAPTIST CHURCH

GOVERNOR ST

CAPE CHILD’S PARADISE EARLY HEAD START

DOLLAR GENERAL

KENTUCKY AV

I RT

CAPE HEAD START PRE-SCHOOL

GARVIN ST

AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM

NEW YORK AV

EVPL CENTRAL

STEVENSON PARK

DENBY AV

COMMUNITY GARDEN

EVANS AV

GREATER ST JAMES MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH

GRAND AV

MEMORIAL BAPTIST CHURCH

MORTON AV

T NU

GARVIN ST

D-PATRICKS FORD

NAZARENE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH

U LN

KENTUCKY AV

VANDERBURGH COUNTY DIVISION OF FAM. RESOURCES

SYCAMORE ST

EVANSVILLE COURIER & PRESS

FAITH CENTERS

BUSINESS & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

COMMUNITY PARKS & GARDENS

YOUTH DEVELOPMENT

COMMUNITY SERVICES

LIBRARIES

HEALTH & WELLNESS

ARTS & CULTURE

SCHOOLS

KEY ASSETS: SNAP SHOT FAITH CENTERS Congregations often have a dynamic position from which to enter community development advocacy. Their role carries both advantages & disadvantages for the Center City. Local congregations each possess some of the necessary qualities to be real change agents—such as an organizational structure and dedication to improving the lives of low-income people critical to engage in successful community development. However, congregations that attempt to do advocacy or meaningful development in the area may stumble upon other difficulties, including a lack of resources, shifting demographics, and technical expertise.

BUSINESS & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT The Memorial Shopping plaza at 535 Lincoln Avenue has the potential for many opportunities, and could be a unique space for a business incubator (or training facility) that could be a solution towards a larger systemic fresh food solution. A creative strategy around the site may include a mixed use development, new green space, business enterprise zone, and solar infrastructure that promotes a shift in development ideology. The 40,000 sqft building sold in 2015 sits in the heart of the Center City, which also includes Lincoln Elementary School and the Evansville African American Museum.

Key Challenge: Creative collaborations & shared events that highlight local capacity building & cohesion. Work to make systemic change through collective impact mission.

The last posted event by the Evansville Black Chamber was in January of 2018.

YOUTH DEVELOPMENT Over recent decades many social forces have changed both the landscape and culture of family, community and the expectations for minority youth in Evansville. We only need to look at the negative media exposure, disorganization of neighborhoods, schools, and general quality of life; for the Center City, concerns about youth should be at the center of many policy debates, voting booths, and Sunday dinners. More conversations about shifting the life outcomes of youth in the area should be a priority considering a recent survey shared the number one goal of future millennials (80%) was to get rich. Another goal (+50%) shared that being famous as a real life goal. The future well-being of the region depends on raising a generation of skilled, competent, and responsible adults. Yet today many youth in the Evansville area are at serious risk of not reaching a productive adulthood or fame. Important youth programs and ministries in the Canal District can be found through Head Start, Boys and Girls Club, Boom Squad, and Memorial Youth Employment Program. Key Opportunity: Work together to build a local platform for Youth Council. Focus on entrepreneurship, youth employment, and skills focused on productive adulthood

Key Challenge: Establishing and maintaining local business chamber or association to develop action items and ways to grow a business enterprise corridor.

LIBRARIES Many visitors to the library learn about political, cultural organizations, or important activities taking place in the neighborhood and city. The foot traffic & cultural vitality of the EVPL Libraries enhances the desirability of the Center City community. The library’s (2) locations in the Canal District could attract tourists, knowledge workers, homeowners, and high technology industries to the area. Adjacent to Evansville’s historic Bayard Park, EVPL East is one of city's two Carnegie Libraries. Its architecture brings together a stable historic neighborhood and Bayard Park. The library could be an important contributor in repositioning the district and organizing its ambitions through its Community Inquiry Lab. Key Opportunity: Expand Community Inquiry Lab services and staff to help build bridge between City of Evansville and its communities unique heritage and future.

KEY ASSETS: SNAP SHOT COMMUNITY SERVICES Many community service organizations or community based organizations (CBO's) operate within and serve the Center City community. Their economic and social impact preserves their role in promoting health, well-being, and other important services. In walking around the Center City, its clear that ministries, organizations, and citizens are contributing fully to the Center City community and its local economy. We know community organizations play a critical role in improving health outcomes, reducing healthcare costs, and addressing the social determinants behind quality of life and transportation needs. These services include efforts that protect children, as well as, build strong and economically secure families; including helping older adults maintain a good quality of life and stay connected to employment services; equipping people with disabilities with tools and resources so they can live their lives fully; building quality affordable housing; and providing other key resources. Key Challenge: How can community services further collaborate to tackle systemic health outcomes, including the development of health impact assessments geared towards bringing more resources?

HEALTH & WELLNESS Health and wellness is connected to many critical quality of life elements from exercise, drug addiction, fresh food access, homelessness, and employment. The creative work of local organizations like Bridge Builders is important, as their work looks to help residents gaining independence through suitable housing. Their goal is to help riders get their own transportation through car ownership. Key Opportunity: It has been said, "a neighborhoods physical assets are often directly connected to how a community feels about itself" The neighborhoods physical attributes go hand in hand with its health and wellness, suggesting a major shift in either will cure the other. Fig. 11| Residents attend a local meeting at EVPL Central Branch

KEY ASSETS: SNAP SHOT ARTS & CULTURE

The Baptisttown community has a lot to offer a city and region. Its history is one of kind and includes the first museum of its kind in Indiana. The African American Museum opened its doors in April 2007. The building itself was re-purposed from the last remaining building of Lincoln Gardens, the second Federal Housing Project under 1938 New Deal. Today, the museums location is at the center of the Center City community. The neighborhoods adjacency to the core of downtown is critical. Recent numbers highlight Carmel and South Bend are growing to be the States 3rd largest city. Evansville should lean in on arts and culture as pillars to building a more diverse and just city. Key Opportunity: Educate and inspire local residents to participate in beautification, art, and public space projects as vehicle to build capacity in the arts and culture space. An opportunity to team with Keep Evansville Beautiful and City of Evansville on a Heritage Trail Pedestrian and Bike Corridor along Canal Street may be the kind of idea to promote the district SCHOOLS

COMMUNITY PARKS & GARDENS

The Canal District has a growing urban garden program, various recreational amenities, and one major park (Bayard Park). Historic Bayard Park, named for Samuel Bayard, has an array of historic architecture styles that still grace the neighborhood and park today. Providing local youth and seniors a way to volunteer and participate in local gardens and gain hands on training could be a step towards healing vacant land and other social ills concerning the community. Rochelle-Landers public pool and water playground opens June 1st for the summer season. The area also maintains a ball field adjacent to the Boys and Girls Club. The club promotes a positive environment for youth and provides a number of programs focused on building local pride and character. Key Challenge: Educate and inspire residents to participate in local beautification and public space projects. Seek opportunities to team with Keep Evansville Beautiful, Memorial Urban Garden Program, and Boys and Girls Club to participate in programs like "Day of Caring" which could build capacity, trust, and new friendships.

According to its website Lincoln School is a K â&#x20AC;&#x201C; 8 school that offers reading programs under the framework of Daily 5; Title I and 21st Century Learning Grants; and interactive technology in all classrooms. According to 20172018 report card through the Indiana Department of Education the school received a D as its final letter grade for school accountability. In mid 2019, the Department of Education awarded the local school corporation a grant for poor performing schools. Recently, the Institute for Quality Education has organized parents to advocate for better education for students in the Center City area. Key Opportunity: Improve school performance by transforming curriculum and role in the community to meet needs of local residents.

Fig. 12| A Year of Hip Hop. Photo Credit Tieshka Smith

ATTRACTIONS, GATEWAYS AND CONNECTIVITY JACOBSVILLE

WALLNUT STREET IMPROVEMENTS EEnhance Streets Enha Streetscape scape p pe Designatd gnatd d Bike Lane ane Traffic ffic Calmi Calming Calming Feautu Feau Feautures

GARVIN STREET DEVELOPMENT SSmallll B Business i St Start ta t -Ups Ups Up North N No ort o rrth tth/S //So /South SSo ou outh utth Nei N Ne Neig Neigh eighborhood eig ghb hb rh rh hood ood Cor Corr Corridor rr or rr rridor Pedestrian Pedes P ede e rian est ian an Friendly F iendly Fr i nd ndly dy Street SStree e B Baanner anners aan n nn ners ner ers rs (Stre (St

MULTI-PURPOSE TRAIL Bike Bi B Bik ike Lanes La es Pedestrian P estr n C estrian Crosswal ro ossw ks ks Traffi TTr Traffic rraffic raffi fficc Ca ffi Calm Calming a ming g Feature Featur Features es Gre Green ree reen IInfrastructu Infrastructur tructurre e

PARKING

DOWNTOWN

MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT LLiving g Spaces Spa Sp paacess (housing housin using in upper floors) u us floo oo ors) s) Rental Offices Cultural Centers / Art rtt Studios di Commercial Retail

MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING Mix M ix In ncome ncom n me me Workforce W orkforce rkkfor fo orrrcce Housing o Ho Energy rg gy Efficient / High Hiig gh hP Performance Pe Perfor LOCAL INITIATIVES Gathering Space Small Sm maa Bus m Businesss FFresh ssh FFood oo Options t s

Art Gallery Laundry/Cafe BELLEMEADE BAYARD

EXISTING LAND USE KEY SR 62 H 9T

TH 10

IN RT MA

OLIVE O LIVE ST

Government & Institutional

OLIVE ST

Industrial WALNUT ST

TH 10

IN RT MA

H ST

GUM ST

V RA

POWELL POW WELL AV

CHANDLER AV

EVANS AV

MORTON M MORT N AV A

GARVIN ST

8TH 8T 8 T TH H ST

6TH ST

ND HA

CHANDLER N AV

KERTH AV

Undeveloped / Other

BAYARD PK DR

Residential - Multi-Family

BELLEMEADE AV

KENTUCKY AV A

MULBER M UL UL LBERR B RR RY RY S ST T

GRAND AVE

ID RS

GUM ST Y RR

Residential - Single Family

MORTON AV MORT

ELLIOTT ST

LINE ST

ER TH LU

2N Y RR

Infrastructure & Utilities Parks

LINCOLN AVE

GOVERNOR ST

Y AV KY UCK U KENTU KENTUCKY

DENBY D BY Y AV

ST E

R MO

E CH

EVANS AV

T TS NU T S

GARVIN ST

NEW YORK AV

L WA

WALNUT N ST

CHANDLER C ND DLE DL ER RA AVE V VE E

KERTH AV KERTH

T US

WALNUT ST

T TS

GRAND AV

H 4T

H 6T

S RT OU

SYCAMORE ST

SYCAMORE ST SYC

POWELL AV

BLACKFORD AV B AV

GRAND A AV V

H 8T

Commercial

JOHN ST

BLACKFORD AC CKFO ORD AV AV

WASHINGTON W WA ASH AS SHIN NG NG GTO GT ON O N AV A AVE VE VE ET

NS SU DR

EXISTING ZONING KEY SR 62 H 9T

IN RT MA TH

SYCAMORE ST

SYCAMORE ST SYC

N CA

OLIVE ST

WALNUT ST GRAND AV

TH 10

IN RT MA

2N D

V RA

MORTON AV MOR

R-3

C-2

R-3A

C-3

R-4

C-4

R-5

C0-1

W-1

C0-2

M-3 PUD

CHANDLER AV

EVANS AV

MORTON N AV

GARVIN ST

8TH 8 TH T H ST

6TH ST

ND HA

CHANDLER C AN N AV

C-1

BAYARD PK DR

R-2

M-2

BELLEMEADE AV

KENTUC TU KY Y AV A

B UL

MULBER M UL UL LB BERR RR RY RY S ST T

CHANDLER C ND DLE ER RA AVE E

POWELL POW WELL AV

BLACKFORD AV B AV

GRA GRAND A D AV

GUM ST ST

AIR

M-1

GRAND AVE

ID RS

E CH

Y RR

ELLIOTT ST

LINE ST

ER TH LU

2N Y RR

LINCOLN AVE

GOVERNOR ST

I MA

AV Y AV KY UCK TU KENTUCKY KEN

DENBY AV V

EVANS AV

ST UT TN

GARVIN ST

R-1

KERTH KERT H AV

WALNUT ST

KERTH AV

T US

L WA

WALNUT ST

NEW YORK AV

H 4T

OLIVE ST

O AM

H 6T

T UR

TH 10

H 8T

JOHN ST

BLACKFORD AC A CKFO O D AV AV

WASHINGTON W WA ASH AS SHIN NG NG GTO GT ON O N AV A AVE VE VE ET

NS SU DR

EXISTING TRANSPORTATION ROUTES KEY Lloyd y E Expressway p ayy TH 10

IN RT MA

OLIVE ST

WALNUT ST

2N 6TH ST

V RA

CHANDLER AV

POWELL AV

US 41

NEW YORK AV

TUCKY AV KENT

BAYARD PK DR

CHANDLER AV

CHANDLER AVE

POWELL AV

GRAND AV

ND HA

8T 8TH TH H ST

GUM ST

Y RR

BELLEMEADE AV

KERTH AV

ID RS

GUM ST

MULBER ULBERR RY Y ST

EVANS AV

ST E

A KERTH AV

A GRAND AV

LINE ST

D ST

MORTON AV

2N Y RR

MORTON AV

ST UT LN A W

I MA

KENTUCKY AV

GRAND AVE

ST UT N ST HE

DOWNTOWN

DENBY D BY AV

EVANS AV

CU LO

WALNUT ST WALNU

GA ARVIN ST

H 6T

GARVIN ST

M CA

ELLIOTT ST ST

H 4T

N VI

H 9T

M CA

OLIVE ST

H 6T

TS UR

Existing Bus Stop

T SYCAMORE ST

GOVERNOR ST

Existing Bus Routes

JOHN ST

H 9T

H 8T

BLACKFORD AV

WAS WASHIN WASHINGT A HIN INGTO IN NGTO TO ON AVE ON AVE V ET

NS SU DR

ADAMS AV

COMMUNITY STRATEGY

BIG PICTURE STRATEGY

USE STORM WATER “GREEN” INFRASTRUCTURE AS PEDESTRIAN, BIKE, ART, AND CULTURE GREENWAY TO HELP CONNECTED DOWNTOWN AND BETTER FACILITATE GROWTH

DEVELOP ECONOMIC IMPROVEMENT AREA WITH OVERLAY ZONE TO PROMOTE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND CREATIVE MIXED USE ZONING.

Lloyd Expressway

TIN

R MA HE

T LU

WALNUT STREET

A B D

LINCOLN AVENUE

C S. GARVIN STREET

S. GARVIN STREET

S. GOVERNOR STREET

8TH STREET

WASHINGTON AVENUE

Re-connect Garvin and Elliot Street grid

Re-imagine historic Lincoln Gardens under progressive pro-density development ideology. This thinking would introduce expansion of African American Museum, add new greenspace, parking, and in theory “correct” the urban disinvestment of historically black community.

Develop local economic improvement district w/ local chamber council

Re-think Canal Street as a viable bicycle and pedestrian boulevard that also serves as storm water infrastructure from run off from commerical concrete lots North along Walnut Street

COMMUNITY STRATEGY WHAT WE HEARD A new Canal District would encompass a large area (1.02 sq. miles) and more importantly - 5 key neighborhoods. It includes some of the most stable residential areas and those in need of the greatest care. The framework we have offered is designed to build upon the stability of strong neighborhoods and to come around other neighborhoods that may need more support. This is accomplished by focusing on key areas of intervention where investments in streetscapes, the public realm, existing infrastructure, and structures will have an enourmous impact. These "scenarios" are just several "what if" options that could move the Center City into a future with the city. The following are four key strategies we identified during our process to help guide eventual pillar groups and local decision making.

Connectivity Center City's connectivity to downtown and other neighborhoods can be envisioned to emphasize the historic character of the community while creating a safer, more beautiful travel environment for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders. Streets like Walnut and Lincoln should not just be places to drive or park, but destinations that reflect local businesses, downtown growth, and support resident and visitor travel into and throughout the area.

African American Heritage Trail Currently Canal Street is underutilized and can be easily transformed into an economic development opportunity. The historic pathway could be a vehicle to advance on new housing, establishing start-up businesses, reinforce connectivity, promote African American art and history, and push for more culture initiatives that support citywide programs like urban gardening, pocket parks, and spaces that bring people together. A pedestrian/bike focused trail along Canal Street will be an ecological and culture experience promoting gardens, tree lined streets, and healthy quality of life assets and experiences.

Youth & Education For decades, local residents and parents alike have debated achievement gaps for the area. A theme we heard over and over suggests that racial disparities in achievement are the result of African American studentsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; disengagement or geneal apathy towards education and their future. These ideas are also manifested in the negligence of education circles to recognize the general influences that impede academic achievement for black students; like hiring black teachers or teaching culturally relevant content that may civically grow them as residents or change agents. We hope parents and education advocates will look to school reform tactics that lead to a more equitable and just school system. Issues related to minority teacher to student ratios and how African Americans are depicted in school curriculum should be of concern to local residents fixed on bridging the achievement gap.

Storm Water Green Infrastructure To alleviate current flooding issues, Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) is integrated throughout Canal Street to manage stormwater runoff from current and planned impervious surfaces and develop a system of green public assets and community spaces and gardens. In this scenario, small-and large-scale strategies are woven into a system of parks and public spaces, public rights-of-way, potential development sites and existing residential neighborhoods to create an innovative that will help manage water and serve as an economic driver.

Fig. 13| Planning sketch by w/purpose, llc.

PROCESS FOR REVITALIZATION HOW IT COULD HAPPEN A Canal District revitalization process is not an immediate endeavor. The information below provides a first blush approach to assisting local stakeholders in understanding their growth and development while establishing accountability and benchmarks for success around the following framework. As part of our initial approach to neighborhood revitalization, our scenario planning framework identifies near-term and long-term opportunities for the area to implement with the support of the community and city. Short-term projects take advantage of one of the Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s most abundant assetsâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;vacant land. The plan identifies vacant and owned parcels that could be reprogrammed to provide enhanced uses. These projects were priorities identified during the community engagement process as investments that could have a positive impact on the lives of community members within a relatively short time frame. Short-term projects are centered around the Lincoln and Garvin Street corridors. These neighborhoods were identified by residents as areas of potential and are among the most stable within the Canal District. The phases below are opportunities to help strengthen the long view and allow for growth to radiate from several key victories as momentum is built.

Area Evaluation. Build Trust. Throw the stone far Phase One Complete an area assessment and determine boundaries Ensure area is prepared to invest the private sector time and align key resources to be successful. Invite key anchoring institutions or partners to the table to help develop culturally focused activities and workshops related to civic engagement, education, and redevelopment

Collective Impact & Future Building Phase Two Hire urban design office to further establish engagement, visioning, and long term goals. Determine program priorities w/ anchor partners and key stakeholders. Identify funding and organizational strategies critical to Center City growth, including infrastructure Implement placemaking activities that promotes community involvement/collective impact (Murals, activity, greenway event)

District Development & Massive Change Phase Three Implementation of program priorities Advancement of lead organization to support district independently. Development of sustainable funding mechanism for long range comprehensive plan and district brand

Sustained Growth Phase Four

Phase Four will only fund programmatic and project specific functions Technical Assistance (ISBDC), Project Grants, TIF Consideration, Block Grants, and Redevelopment Funding Assistance

Fig. 14| For over 93 years Memorial Baptist Church has been providing services to the community. Photo by Tieshka Smith

TOWARDS “PLANNING TO STAY” This workbook's long-term scenarios build upon urban strategies to provide a vision for what a Canal District area can become. These improvements are not projects for immediate execution but require long-term coordination of city resources to be fully realized. Scenario planning can be a strategic blueprint to reshape neighborhoods through the development of key goals such as creating density at target neighborhood nodes, refining the character of the streetscapes all while promoting new forms of transit, rehabilitating significant historic buildings, and creating new ways to connect people to resources.

PILLAR TEAMS

The scenarios you will find in this document are neighborhood wide and comprehensive, moving beyond catalytic projects to reenvision a new Canal District. Planning to stay means organizing around building real goals, timelines, and accountability standards. In many ways you’re using “planning to stay” as a platform to organize beyond our own silos and hold ourselves accountable for moving the needle towards outcomes and results.

Housing | Homeownership and vacant land development are critical issues that will need to be addressed as a priority. Decades of enforced segregation, housing discrimination, disinvestment, and misguided federal housing policies have left a pattern of concentrated poverty and property abandonment. Addressing housing issues in the Canal District neighborhoods will be instrumental to the development of new or rehabilitated single-family products that will restore an economic soundness through creative branding, new urban form, and lending products to attract workforce families and immigrant dreamers. Enterprise Zone | Business activity, community interests, market opportunities, transportation,

and pedestrian linkages at the intersections of Garvin & Lincoln Avenue present an opportunity for focused planning and development. Building off early mixed use concepts presented for the former grocery store, an economic enhancement zone could be a near-term opportunity that identifies a process for the redevelopment of vacant/underutilized structures and parcels.

Youth | Local ministries and key stakeholders should collaborate to provide ideas, services and 03 networks that local leaders need to make more intentional decisions that are good for young people.

Culture | Arts and Culture development and programming can be vital economic drivers for

Education | Organizing parents around policies that will enhance the educational outcomes for local students, build community pride, and attract families to the community.

highlighting the best assets and character of where you live.

PILLAR GROUP | 01 - HOUSING OVERVIEW OF AREA HOUSING DATA Using the ERSI data provided will help local residents and stakeholdes strategically plan community development strategies. The data offers some eye opening numbers that will be helpful towards setting long and short term goals towards solving systemic issues related to vacant housing and energy efficiency.

Current Housing Trends • Millennials make up 34% of American homebuyers in 2017, a greater percentage than any other age group, according to the National Association of Realtors. Around 70% of millennials expect to live in singlefamily homes by 2020, according to a study from the Urban Land Institute, a real-estate and land-use think tank. • A recent study by Deloitte found that 64% of millennial consumers say “increasing the use of solar power” is their number one priority. Millennials are making up the largest percentage of homebuyers. • Diversity (economic, housing, and otherwise) not only supports and enhances your community today, but ensures longevity into the future. Millennials, the largest generation, are also the most diverse generation in history. If you want to make your community feel welcoming and open to Millennials as they continue to flood the workplace, being supportive of diversity will be important.

Goals of the Community?

03 05

04 • Studies and reports highlight that modular construction markets will rise in the coming years. In 2017, stats showed a $106.15 billion value in the modular construction market. They projected that this value will reach $157.19 billion by 2023, forecasting a compound annual growth rate of 6.9%.

Small homes coupled with creative place making are future of real estate

Solar Power and energy efficiency is vital

New fabrication methods & modular housing could change the way we buy homes

Housing Profile Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Population 2010 Total Population 2018 Total Population 2023 Total Population 2018-2023 Annual Rate

5,046 4,886 4,839 -0.19%

Prepared by Esri

Households 2018 Median Household Income 2023 Median Household Income 2018-2023 Annual Rate

Number 2,415 1,794 763 1,031 621

2018 Percent 100.0% 74.3% 31.6% 42.7% 25.7%

Number 2,427 1,766 770 996 661

2023 Percent 100.0% 72.8% 31.7% 41.0% 27.2%

Number 764 226 450 48 21 3

2018 Percent 100.0% 29.6% 58.9% 6.3% 2.7% 0.4%

Number 770 189 441 58 32 5

2023 Percent 100.0% 24.5% 57.3% 7.5% 4.2% 0.6%

$250,000-$299,999 $300,000-$399,999 $400,000-$499,999 $500,000-$749,999 $750,000-$999,999 $1,000,000-$1,499,999 $1,500,000-$1,999,999

2 3 0 9 0 2 0

0.3% 0.4% 0.0% 1.2% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

5 17 7 14 1 1 0

0.6% 2.2% 0.9% 1.8% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0%

$2,000,000+

0.0%

Housing Units by Occupancy Status and Tenure Total Housing Units Occupied Owner Renter Vacant

Owner Occupied Housing Units by Value Total <$50,000 $50,000-$99,999 $100,000-$149,999 $150,000-$199,999 $200,000-$249,999

Median Value Average Value Census 2010 Housing Units Total In Urbanized Areas In Urban Clusters Rural Housing Units

Census 2010 Number Percent 2,414 100.0% 1,879 77.8% 866 35.9% 1,013 42.0% 535 22.2%

$26,572 $30,417 2.74%

$67,333 $77,847

$72,222 $94,968 Number 2,414 2,414 0 0

Percent 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Data Note: Persons of Hispanic Origin may be of any race. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 1 of 2

Housing Profile Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

Census 2010 Owner Occupied Housing Units by Mortgage Status Total Owned with a Mortgage/Loan Owned Free and Clear

Number 866 608 258

Percent 100.0% 70.2% 29.8%

Number 519 200 4 93 13 5 0 204

Percent 100.0% 38.5% 0.8% 17.9% 2.5% 1.0% 0.0% 39.3%

Census 2010 Vacant Housing Units by Status Total For Rent Rented- Not Occupied For Sale Only Sold - Not Occupied Seasonal/Recreational/Occasional Use For Migrant Workers Other Vacant Census 2010 Occupied Housing Units by Age of Householder and Home Ownership

Total 15-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+

Occupied Units 1,878 111 284 309 377 349 234 139 75

Owner Occupied Units Number % of Occupied 865 46.1% 14 12.6% 68 23.9% 142 46.0% 184 48.8% 185 53.0% 144 61.5% 82 59.0% 46 61.3%

Census 2010 Occupied Housing Units by Race/Ethnicity of Householder and Home Ownership

Total White Alone Black/African American Alone American Indian/Alaska Alone NativeAlone Asian Pacific Islander Alone Other Race Alone Two or More Races Hispanic Origin

Occupied Units 1,879 671 1,153 8 5 1 7 34 27

Owner Occupied Units Number % of Occupied 867 46.1% 300 44.7% 552 47.9% 3 37.5% 1 20.0% 1 100.0% 1 14.3% 9 26.5% 10

37.0%

Census 2010 Occupied Housing Units by Size and Home Ownership

Total 1-Person 2-Person 3-Person 4-Person 5-Person 6-Person 7+ Person

Occupied Units 1,880 706 476 298 190 111 49 50

Owner Occupied Units Number % of Occupied 866 46.1% 284 40.2% 272 57.1% 141 47.3% 83 43.7% 45 40.5% 18 36.7% 23 46.0%

Data Note: Persons of Hispanic Origin may be of any race. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 2 of 2

ACS Housing Summary Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

2012-2016 ACS Estimate

Percent

MOE(Âą)

TOTALS Total Population

4,491

320

Total Households

1,827

105

Total Housing Units

2,449

104

OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY MORTGAGE STATUS Total

821

100.0%

441

53.7%

Second mortgage only

1.1%

Home equity loan only

2.7%

Housing units with a mortgage/contract to purchase/similar debt

Both second mortgage and home equity loan No second mortgage and no home equity loan Housing units without a mortgage

0.1%

409

49.8%

380

46.3%

Reliability

AVERAGE VALUE BY MORTGAGE STATUS Housing units with a mortgage

$71,025

$14,415

Housing units without a mortgage

$54,092

$12,935

OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY MORTGAGE STATUS & SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS 821

Total

100.0%

With a mortgage: Monthly owner costs as a percentage of income in in past past 12 12 months household income months household Less than 10.0 percent

0.9%

10.0 to 14.9 percent

11.1%

15.0 to 19.9 percent

8.6%

20.0 to 24.9 percent

6.8%

25.0 to 29.9 percent 30.0 to 34.9 percent

3.3%

5.8%

35.0 to 39.9 percent

0.5%

40.0 to 49.9 percent

4.4%

50.0 percent or more

11.6%

0.6%

Less than 10.0 percent

8.8%

10.0 to 14.9 percent

4.4%

15.0 to 19.9 percent

122

14.9%

20.0 to 24.9 percent

4.1%

25.0 to 29.9 percent

7.7%

30.0 to 34.9 percent

1.1%

35.0 to 39.9 percent

1.9%

40.0 to 49.9 percent

1.9%

50.0 percent or more

1.5%

0.0%

Not computed Without a mortgage: Monthly owner costs as a percentage of household income in past 12 months

Not computed

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey

Reliability:

high

medium

low

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 1 of 4

ACS Housing Summary Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

2012-2016 ACS Estimate

Percent

MOE(±)

1,006

100.0%

927

92.1%

Less than $100

2.9%

$100 to $149

1.9%

$150 to $199

2.6%

$200 to $249

6.0%

$250 to $299

5.1%

$300 to $349

6.8%

$350 to $399

8.4%

$400 to $449

130

12.9%

$450 to $499

7.7%

$500 to $549

8.8%

$550 to $599

8.7%

$600 to $649

8.3%

$650 to $699

2.5%

$700 to $749

1.6%

$750 to $799

4.5%

$800 to $899

2.5%

$900 to $999

0.8%

$1,000 to $1,249

0.0%

$1,250 to $1,499

0.0%

$1,500 to $1,999

0.0%

$2,000 to $2,499

0.1%

$2,500 to $2,999

0.0%

$3,000 to $3,499

0.0%

$3,500 or more

0.0

7.9%

Reliability

RENTER-OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY CONTRACT RENT Total With cash rent

No cash rent Median Contract Rent

$448

N/A

Average Contract Rent

$454

$67

RENTER-OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY INCLUSION OF UTILITIES IN RENT 1,006

100.0%

Pay extra for one or more utilities

893

88.8%

No extra payment for any utilities

113

11.2%

Total

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey

Reliability:

high

medium

low

Page 2 of 4

ACS Housing Summary Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

2012-2016 ACS Estimate

Percent

MOE(±)

Reliability

HOUSING UNITS BY UNITS IN STRUCTURE

Total

2,449

100.0%

104

1, detached

1,720

70.2%

1, attached

1.9%

135

5.5%

3 or 4

206

8.4%

5 to 9

113

4.6%

10 to 19

2.2%

20 to 49

3.7%

50 or more

3.4%

Mobile home

0.0%

Boat, RV, van, etc.

0.0%

HOUSING UNITS BY YEAR STRUCTURE BUILT

Total

2,449

100.0%

104

Built 2014 or later

0.0%

Built 2010 to 2013

0.2%

Built 2000 to 2009

131

5.3%

Built 1990 to 1999

226

9.2%

Built 1980 to 1989

118

4.8%

Built 1970 to 1979

105

4.3%

Built 1960 to 1969

135

5.5%

Built 1950 to 1959

147

6.0%

Built 1940 to 1949

226

9.2%

1,356

55.4%

109

Built 1939 or earlier Median Year Structure Built

1940

N/A

OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY YEAR HOUSEHOLDER MOVED INTO UNIT Total

1,827

100.0%

105

Moved in 2015 or later

0.2%

Moved in 2010 to 2014

109

6.0%

Moved in 2000 to 2009

200

10.9%

Moved in 1990 to 1999

199

10.9%

Moved in 1980 to 1989

3.3%

248

13.6%

Owner occupied

Moved in 1979 or earlier Renter occupied Moved in 2015 or later

4.1%

Moved in 2010 to 2014

579

31.7%

Moved in 2000 to 2009

294

16.1%

Moved in 1990 to 1999

1.5%

Moved in 1980 to 1989

0.5%

1.3%

Moved in 1979 or earlier Median Year Householder Moved Into Unit

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey

2007

N/A

Reliability:

high

medium

low

Page 3 of 4

ACS Housing Summary Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

2012-2016 ACS Estimate

Percent

MOE(Âą)

1,827

100.0%

105

1,199

65.6%

0.2%

616

33.7%

Fuel oil, kerosene, etc.

0.0%

Coal or coke

0.0%

Wood

0.1%

Solar energy

0.0%

Other fuel

0.3%

No fuel used

0.0%

1,827

100.0%

105

Reliability

OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY HOUSE HEATING FUEL Total Utility gas Bottled, tank, or LP gas Electricity

OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY VEHICLES AVAILABLE

Total Owner occupied No vehicle available

2.0%

1 vehicle available

339

18.6%

2 vehicles available

359

19.6%

3 vehicles available

3.7%

4 vehicles available

1.0%

0.0%

No vehicle available

327

17.9%

1 vehicle available

452

24.7%

2 vehicles available

161

8.8%

3 vehicles available

1.3%

4 vehicles available

1.0%

5 or more vehicles available

1.3%

Average Number of Vehicles Available

1.3

5 or more vehicles available Renter occupied

0.1

Data Note: N/A means not available. 2012-2016 ACS Estimate: The American Community Survey (ACS) replaces census sample data. Esri is releasing the 2012-2016 ACS estimates, five-year period data collected monthly from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2014. Although the ACS includes many of the subjects previously covered by the decennial census sample, there are significant differences between the two surveys including fundamental differences in survey design and residency rules. Margin of error (MOE): The MOE is a measure of the variability of the estimate due to sampling error. MOEs enable the data user to measure the range of uncertainty for each estimate with 90 percent confidence. The range of uncertainty is called the confidence interval, and it is calculated by taking the estimate +/- the MOE. For example, if the ACS reports an estimate of 100 with an MOE of +/- 20, then you can be 90 percent certain the value for the whole population falls between 80 and 120. Reliability: These symbols represent threshold values that Esri has established from the Coefficients of Variation (CV) to designate the usability of the estimates. The CV measures the amount of sampling error relative to the size of the estimate, expressed as a percentage. High Reliability: Small CVs (less than or equal to 12 percent) are flagged green to indicate that the sampling error is small relative to the estimate and the estimate is reasonably reliable. Medium Reliability: Estimates with CVs between 12 and 40 are flagged yellow-use with caution. Low Reliability: Large CVs (over 40 percent) are flagged red to indicate that the sampling error is large relative to the estimate. The estimate is considered very unreliable. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey

Reliability:

high

medium

low

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 4 of 4

PILLAR GROUP | 02 - ENTERPRISE CORRIDOR OVERVIEW OF ENTERPRISE ZONE Similar to the recently approved Jacobsville "overlay zone" - the select enterprise boundary area is where a government authority could grant a special tax or tool, zoning, or regulatory exemptions in order to promote local economic development. The Canal District could be a great tool for bringing big ideas to bear that will make your district unique and one of a kind.

Current Retail Trade and Consumer Behavior • According to a 2015 Nielsen report, black Americans nationally are having an “unprecedented impact” across a number of areas, especially television, music, and social media. The report highlights how black youth define mainstream culture and "wield immense influence over how Americans choose to spend their money". While black buying power is projected to reach $1.4 trillion by 2020, according to the University of Georgia’s Selig Center many of these purchases go into the pockets of non black businesses

03 05

• There was an increase in the Evansville's Black unemployment rate from 2000 to 2010. Today, national numbers highlight black unemployment as the lowest it has ever been since 1969. • How do you feed the residents in your community and make them healthier? Statistics show that four out of every ten EVV residents have increased their chances for heart disease, heart attacks and diabetes - thus the 19% health care business sector in the Center City. A solution could be new food and drink products that mention “plant-based” which grew 268% between 2012 and 2018. We see a new healthy burger and rib joint in the Center City.

Black Girls Code www.blackgirlscode.com/

• Robotics and programming have also become more accessible and less expensive. Training a population around these intuitive interfaces allows employees to set up simple robotic procedures without a degree in computer science. This could be an opportunity in supporting the regions industry.

St. Paul MN https://creativeenterprisezone.org/

Plant based protein (AP/Eugene Hoshiko)

Economic Well-Being

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2008-2010 American Community Survey 3-year Averages

Median Household Income, 2010

VANDERBURGH COUNTY

32.2% of Black households own their home (2010)

INDIANA BLACK EXPO, INC.

Business Summary Prepared by Esri

Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles Data for all businesses in area Total Businesses: Total Employees:

213 3,329

Total Residential Population: Employee/Residential Population Ratio (per 100 Residents)

4,886 68

by SIC Codes Agriculture & Mining Construction Manufacturing Transportation Communication Utility Wholesale Trade

Businesses Number Percent 3 1.4% 10 4.7% 3 1.4% 5 2.3% 2 0.9% 0 0.0% 8 3.8%

Employees Number Percent 12 0.4% 66 2.0% 200 6.0% 75 2.3% 11 0.3% 0 0.0% 97 2.9%

Retail Trade Summary Home Improvement General Merchandise Stores Food Stores Auto Dealers, Gas Stations, Auto Aftermarket Apparel & Accessory Stores Furniture & Home Furnishings Eating & Drinking Places Miscellaneous Retail

32 0 3 7 2 0 6 4 9

15.0% 0.0% 1.4% 3.3% 0.9% 0.0% 2.8% 1.9% 4.2%

312 14 17 45 39 0 64 69 62

9.4% 0.4% 0.5% 1.4% 1.2% 0.0% 1.9% 2.1% 1.9%

Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Summary Banks, Savings & Lending Institutions Securities Brokers Insurance Carriers & Agents Real Estate, Holding, Other Investment Offices

10 1 1 3 5

4.7% 0.5% 0.5% 1.4% 2.3%

62 5 4 30 23

1.9% 0.2% 0.1% 0.9% 0.7%

120 0 4 0 25 2 7 82

56.3% 0.0% 1.9% 0.0% 11.7% 0.9% 3.3% 38.5%

2,241 1 13 5 818 11 336 1,056

67.3% 0.0% 0.4% 0.2% 24.6% 0.3% 10.1% 31.7%

5.6%

255

7.7%

3.8%

0.0%

213

100.0%

3,329

100.0%

Services Summary Hotels & Lodging Automotive Services Motion Pictures & Amusements Health Services Legal Services Education Institutions & Libraries Other Services Government Unclassified Establishments Totals

Source: Copyright 2018 Infogroup, Inc. All rights reserved. Esri Total Residential Population forecasts for 2018. Date Note: Data on the Business Summary report is calculated using Esriâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Data allocation method which uses census block groups to allocate business summary data to custom areas.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 1 of 2

Business Summary Prepared by Esri

Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

by NAICS Codes Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting Mining Utilities Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers Furniture & Home Furnishings Stores Electronics & Appliance Stores Bldg Material & Garden Equipment & Supplies Dealers Food & Beverage Stores Health & Personal Care Stores Gasoline Stations Clothing & Clothing Accessories Stores Sport Goods, Hobby, Book, & Music Stores General Merchandise Stores Miscellaneous Store Retailers Nonstore Retailers Transportation & Warehousing Information Finance & Insurance Central Bank/Credit Intermediation & Related Activities Securities, Commodity Contracts & Other Financial & Other Related Activities; Activities Funds, Trusts & Investments Insurance Carriers & Related Financial Other Estate, RentalVehicles & Leasing Real Professional, Scientific & Tech Services Legal Services Management of Companies & Enterprises Administrative & Support & Waste Management & Remediation Services Educational Services Health Care & Social Assistance Arts, Entertainment & Recreation Accommodation & Food Services Accommodation Food Services & Drinking Places Other Services (except Public Administration) Automotive Repair & Maintenance Public Administration Unclassified Establishments Total

Businesses Number Percent 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11 5.2% 3 1.4% 8 3.8% 28 13.1% 1 0.5% 2 0.9% 5 2.3% 0 0.0% 6 2.8% 2 0.9% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 2 0.9% 3 1.4% 5 2.3% 0 0.0% 5 2.3% 4 1.9% 5 2.3% 1 0.5% 1 0.5% 3 1.4% 7 3.3% 19 8.9% 2 0.9% 0 0.0% 8 3.8% 6 2.8% 42 19.7% 2 0.9% 4 1.9% 0 0.0% 4 1.9% 42 19.7% 3 1.4% 12 5.6%

Employees Number Percent 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 73 2.2% 15 0.5% 97 2.9% 236 7.1% 35 1.1% 14 0.4% 64 1.9% 14 0.4% 38 1.1% 7 0.2% 4 0.1% 0 0.0% 7 0.2% 17 0.5% 35 1.1% 0 0.0% 75 2.3% 226 6.8% 38 1.1% 5 0.2% 4 0.1% 30 0.9% 30 0.9% 233 7.0% 16 0.5% 0 0.0% 198 5.9% 313 9.4% 1,110 33.3% 15 0.5% 70 2.1% 1 0.0% 69 2.1% 345 10.4% 8 0.2% 255 7.7%

3.8%

0.0%

213

100.0%

3,329

100.0%

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 2 of 2

Finances Market Potential Prepared by Esri

Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Demographic Summary Population Population 18+ Households Median Household Income Product/Consumer Behavior Did banking in person in last 12 months Bank/financial institution used: Bank of America Bank/financial institution used: Capital One Bank/financial institution used: Chase Bank/financial institution used: Citibank Bank/financial institution used: PNC Bank/financial institution used: U.S. Bank Bank/financial institution used: Wells Fargo Bank/financial institution used: credit union Bank/financial inst used: local/community bank Did banking by mail in last 12 months Did banking by phone in last 12 months Did banking online in last 12 months Did banking on mobile device in last 12 months Used ATM/cash machine in last 12 months Used direct deposit of paycheck in last 12 months Did banking w/paperless statements in last 12 mo Have interest checking account Have non-interest checking account Have savings account Have overdraft protection Have auto loan Have personal loan for education (student loan) Have personal loan - not for education Have home mortgage (1st) Have 2nd mortgage (home equity loan) Have home equity line of credit Have personal line of credit Have 401(k) retirement savings plan Have 403(b) retirement savings plan Have Roth IRA retirement savings plan Have Traditional IRA retirement savings plan Own any securities investment Own any annuity Own certificate of deposit (more than 6 months) Own shares in money market fund Own shares in mutual fund (bonds) Own shares in mutual fund (stock) Own any stock Own common stock in company you don`t work for Own U.S. savings bond Own investment real estate Own vacation/weekend home Used a real estate agent in last 12 months Used financial planner in last 12 months Own 1 credit card Own 2 credit cards Own 3 credit cards Own 4 credit cards Own 5 credit cards Own 6+ credit cards

Expected Number of Adults 1,546 387 145 302 79 123 103 325 582 250 83 258 802 558 1,556 1,156 525 610 825 1,619 670 504 210 153 669 101 85 135 361 83 144 219 582 72 84 82 95 140 128 98 137 116 87 146 130 531 369 245 158 82 158

2018 4,886 3,674 1,794 $26,572

2023 4,839 3,659 1,766 $30,417

Percent 42.1% 10.5% 3.9% 8.2% 2.2% 3.3% 2.8% 8.8% 15.8% 6.8% 2.3% 7.0% 21.8% 15.2% 42.4% 31.5% 14.3% 16.6% 22.5% 44.1% 18.2% 13.7% 5.7% 4.2% 18.2% 2.7% 2.3% 3.7% 9.8% 2.3% 3.9% 6.0% 15.8% 2.0% 2.3% 2.2% 2.6% 3.8% 3.5% 2.7% 3.7% 3.2% 2.4% 4.0% 3.5% 14.5% 10.0% 6.7% 4.3% 2.2% 4.3%

MPI 76 84 69 59 64 98 86 70 85 74 70 73 56 65 79 73 61 56 76 76 65 67 81 126 58 53 65 104 63 76 52 57 53 74 83 54 54 55 48 52 77 76 65 65 52 85 69 66 65 58 71

Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average. Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by GfK MRI in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2018 and 2023.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 1 of 3

Finances Market Potential Prepared by Esri

Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Product/Consumer Behavior Credit cards: Never or rarely carry a balance Credit cards: Sometimes carry a balance Credit cards: Usually or always carry a balance Avg monthly credit card expenditures: <$111 Avg monthly credit card expenditures: $111-$225 Avg monthly credit card expenditures: $226-$450 Avg monthly credit card expenditures: $451-$700 Avg monthly credit card expenditures: $701-$1000 Avg monthly credit card expenditures: $1001+ Own 1 debit card Own 2 debit cards Avg monthly debit card expenditures: <$91 Avg monthly debit card expenditures: $91-$180 Avg monthly debit card expenditures: $181-$225 Avg monthly debit card expenditures: $226-$450 Avg monthly debit card expenditures: $451-$700 Avg monthly debit card expenditures: $701-$1000 Avg monthly debit card expenditures: $1001+ Own/used last 12 months: any credit/debit card Own/used last 12 months: any major credit/debit card Own/used last 12 months: any store credit card Credit/debit card rewards: airline miles Credit/debit card rewards: cash back Credit/debit card rewards: gasoline discounts Credit/debit card rewards: gifts Credit/debit card rewards: hotel/car rental awards Have American Express Green card in own name Have American Express Gold card in own name Have American Express Platinum card in own name Have American Express Blue card in own name Have Discover card in own name Have MasterCard Standard card in own name Have MasterCard Gold card in own name Have MasterCard Platinum card in own name Have MasterCard debit card in own name Have Visa Regular/Classic card in own name Have Visa Gold card in own name Have Visa Platinum card in own name Have Visa Signature card in own name Have Visa debit card in own name Paid bills last 12 months: by mail Paid bills last 12 months: online Paid bills last 12 months: in person Paid bills last 12 months: by phone using credit card Paid bills last 12 months: by mobile phone Paid bills last 12 months: charged to credit card Paid bills last 12 months: deducted from bank account Wired/sent money in last 6 months Wired/sent money in last 6 months: using MoneyGram Used Apple Pay digital payment service/30 days Used Google Wallet digital payment service/30 days Used PayPal digital payment service/30 days Used Visa Checkout digital payment service/30 days Used other digital payment service/30 days Wired/sent money in last 6 months: using Western Union

Expected Number of Adults 610 600 633 461 247 204 141 119 197 1,519 317 201 162 170 269 240 287 225 2,481 2,068 690 173 672 153 124 83 73 64 66 104 216 372 94 140 308 689 93 214 124 660 1,065 1,274 1,425 892 562 372 704 641 194 70 56 378 125 129 322

Percent 16.6% 16.3% 17.2% 12.5% 6.7% 5.6% 3.8% 3.2% 5.4% 41.3% 8.6% 5.5% 4.4% 4.6% 7.3% 6.5% 7.8% 6.1% 67.5% 56.3% 18.8% 4.7% 18.3% 4.2% 3.4% 2.3% 2.0% 1.7% 1.8% 2.8% 5.9% 10.1% 2.6% 3.8% 8.4% 18.8% 2.5% 5.8% 3.4% 18.0% 29.0% 34.7% 38.8% 24.3% 15.3% 10.1% 19.2% 17.4% 5.3% 1.9% 1.5% 10.3% 3.4% 3.5% 8.8%

MPI 54 100 95 104 94 82 62 56 49 86 74 128 80 94 88 74 101 69 85 80 67 47 65 95 83 68 72 64 62 66 56 66 86 66 103 76 89 63 61 86 74 70 136 112 88 66 72 124 163 64 95 62 85 107 194

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 2 of 3

Finances Market Potential Prepared by Esri

Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles Expected Number of Adults 83

Percent 2.3%

MPI 69

Tax preparation: did manually Tax preparation: used software (TurboTax)

436 373

11.9% 10.2%

84 85

Tax preparation: used online tax srv (TurboTax)

256

7.0%

Tax preparation: used H&R Block on-site

197

5.4%

105

Tax preparation: used CPA/other tax professional

255

6.9%

Product/Consumer Behavior Wired/sent money in last 6 months: bank wire transfer

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 3 of 3

Retail Market Potential Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

Demographic Summary Population Population 18+ Households Median Household Income

2018 4,886 3,674 1,794 $26,572

2023 4,839 3,659 1,766 $30,417

Expected Number of Adults/HHs

Percent of Adults/HHs

MPI

1,515 1,390 1,005 1,576 621 665 611

41.2% 37.8% 27.4% 42.9% 16.9% 18.1% 16.6%

87 87 102 80 93 101 105

Automobiles (Households) HH owns/leases any vehicle HH bought/leased new vehicle last 12 mo

1,261 94

70.3% 5.2%

82 54

Automotive Aftermarket (Adults) Bought gasoline in last 6 months Bought/changed motor oil in last 12 months Had tune-up in last 12 months

2,719 1,650 842

74.0% 44.9% 22.9%

87 94 89

Beverages (Adults) Drank bottled water/seltzer in last 6 months Drank regular cola in last 6 months Drank beer/ale in last 6 months

2,469 1,985 1,345

67.2% 54.0% 36.6%

97 122 87

Cameras (Adults) Own digital point & shoot camera/camcorder Own digital SLR camera/camcorder Printed digital photos in last 12 months

236 153 448

6.4% 4.2% 12.2%

55 53 52

1,393 2,810 1,971 711 726 584 405 1,116

37.9% 76.5% 53.6% 19.4% 40.5% 32.6% 22.6% 62.2%

105 96 138 50 131 85 82 118

979 483 729 154 884 454 147 224 211 82 66 44

54.6% 26.9% 40.6% 8.6% 49.3% 25.3% 8.2% 12.5% 11.8% 4.6% 3.7% 2.5%

73 70 72 48 78 68 61 82 67 48 80 60

Product/Consumer Behavior Apparel (Adults) Bought any men's clothing in last 12 months Bought any women's clothing in last 12 months Bought clothing for child <13 years in last 6 months Bought any shoes in last 12 months Bought costume jewelry in last 12 months Bought any fine jewelry in last 12 months Bought a watch in last 12 months

Cell Phones (Adults/Households) Bought cell phone in last 12 months Have a smartphone Have a smartphone: Android phone (any brand) Have a smartphone: Apple iPhone Number of cell phones in household: 1 Number of cell phones in household: 2 Number of cell phones in household: 3+ HH has cell phone only (no landline telephone) Computers (Households) HH owns a computer HH owns desktop computer HH owns laptop/notebook HH owns any Apple/Mac brand computer HH owns any PC/non-Apple brand computer HH purchased most recent computer in a store HH purchased most recent computer online Spent <$500 on most recent home computer Spent $500-$999 on most recent home computer Spent $1,000-$1,499 on most recent home computer " Spent $1,500-$1,999 on most recent home computer Spent $2,000+ on most recent home computer

Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults or households in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average. Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by GfK MRI in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2018 and 2023.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 1 of 4

Retail Market Potential Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

Expected Number of Adults/HHs

Percent of Adults/HHs

MPI

Convenience Stores (Adults) Shopped at convenience store in last 6 mos Bought brewed coffee at convenience store in last 30 days Bought cigarettes at convenience store in last 30 days Bought gas at convenience store in last 30 days Spent at convenience store in last 30 days: <$20 Spent at convenience store in last 30 days: $20-$39 Spent at convenience store in last 30 days: $40-$50 Spent at convenience store in last 30 days: $51-$99 Spent at convenience store in last 30 days: $100+

2,244 512 645 1,367 234 347 256 192 859

61.1% 13.9% 17.6% 37.2% 6.4% 9.4% 7.0% 5.2% 23.4%

98 103 161 101 88 99 84 94 105

Entertainment (Adults) Attended a movie in last 6 months Went to live theater in last 12 months Went to a bar/night club in last 12 months Dined out in last 12 months Gambled at a casino in last 12 months Visited a theme park in last 12 months Viewed movie (video-on-demand) in last 30 days Viewed TV show (video-on-demand) in last 30 days Watched any pay-per-view TV in last 12 months Downloaded a movie over the Internet in last 30 days Downloaded any individual song in last 6 months Watched a movie online in the last 30 days Watched a TV program online in last 30 days

1,893 269 494 1,280 436 551 487 474 310 302 655 836 519

51.5% 7.3% 13.4% 34.8% 11.9% 15.0% 13.3% 12.9% 8.4% 8.2% 17.8% 22.8% 14.1%

87 63 77 68 92 79 73 92 77 91 88 95 79

368 208

10.0% 5.7%

110 109

669 1,556 128 137 140 95 610 825 1,619 361 2,481 461 247 204 141 119 197 802 558 1,274

18.2% 42.4% 3.5% 3.7% 3.8% 2.6% 16.6% 22.5% 44.1% 9.8% 67.5% 12.5% 6.7% 5.6% 3.8% 3.2% 5.4% 21.8% 15.2% 34.7%

58 79 48 77 55 54 56 76 76 63 85 104 94 82 62 56 49 56 65 70

Product/Consumer Behavior

Played a video/electronic game (console) in last 12 months Played a video/electronic game (portable) in last 12 months Financial (Adults) Have home mortgage (1st) Used ATM/cash machine in last 12 months Own any stock Own U.S. savings bond Own shares in mutual fund (stock) Own shares in mutual fund (bonds) Have interest checking account Have non-interest checking account Have savings account Have 401K retirement savings plan Own/used any credit/debit card in last 12 months Avg monthly credit card expenditures: <$111 Avg monthly credit card expenditures: $111-$225 Avg monthly credit card expenditures: $226-$450 Avg monthly credit card expenditures: $451-$700 Avg monthly credit card expenditures: $701-$1,000 Avg monthly credit card expenditures: $1,001+ Did banking online in last 12 months Did banking on mobile device in last 12 months Paid bills online in last 12 months

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 2 of 4

Retail Market Potential Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

Expected Number of Adults/HHs

Percent of Adults/HHs

MPI

1,170 1,686 1,166 282 986 1,476 1,482 373

65.2% 94.0% 65.0% 15.7% 55.0% 82.3% 82.6% 20.8%

95 100 94 103 100 94 96 88

753 300 2,555 1,673

20.5% 8.2% 69.5% 45.5%

73 57 90 84

315 154 241 312 330 209

17.6% 8.6% 13.4% 17.4% 18.4% 11.6%

63 61 80 79 82 83

1,376 2,274 1,069 344 652 290 257

37.5% 61.9% 29.1% 9.4% 36.3% 16.2% 14.3%

84 83 61 109 119 56 63

795 322 580

44.3% 17.9% 32.3%

81 78 78

Psychographics (Adults) Buying American is important to me Usually buy items on credit rather than wait Usually buy based on quality - not price Price is usually more important than brand name Usually use coupons for brands I buy often Am interested in how to help the environment Usually pay more for environ safe product Usually value green products over convenience Likely to buy a brand that supports a charity

1,507 445 733 1,022 638 692 585 498 1,281

41.0% 12.1% 20.0% 27.8% 17.4% 18.8% 15.9% 13.6% 34.9%

101 93 103 100 97 103 112 120 101

Reading (Adults) Bought digital book in last 12 months Bought hardcover book in last 12 months Bought paperback book in last 12 month Read any daily newspaper (paper version) Read any digital newspaper in last 30 days Read any magazine (paper/electronic version) in last 6 months

296 533 727 849 1,081 3,192

8.1% 14.5% 19.8% 23.1% 29.4% 86.9%

60 73 68 112 78 96

Product/Consumer Behavior Grocery (Adults) Used beef (fresh/frozen) in last 6 months Used bread in last 6 months Used chicken (fresh or frozen) in last 6 months Used turkey (fresh or frozen) in last 6 months Used fish/seafood (fresh or frozen) in last 6 months Used fresh fruit/vegetables in last 6 months Used fresh milk in last 6 months Used organic food in last 6 months Health (Adults) Exercise at home 2+ times per week Exercise at club 2+ times per week Visited a doctor in last 12 months Used vitamin/dietary supplement in last 6 months Home (Households) Any home improvement in last 12 months Used housekeeper/maid/professional HH cleaning service in last 12 Purchased low ticket HH furnishings in last 12 months months Purchased big ticket HH furnishings in last 12 months Bought any small kitchen appliance in last 12 months Bought any large kitchen appliance in last 12 months Insurance (Adults/Households) Currently carry life insurance Carry medical/hospital/accident insurance Carry homeowner insurance Carry renter's insurance Have auto insurance: 1 vehicle in household covered Have auto insurance: 2 vehicles in household covered Have auto insurance: 3+ vehicles in household covered Pets (Households) Household owns any pet Household owns any cat Household owns any dog

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 3 of 4

PILLAR GROUP | 03 - YOUTH OVERVIEW OF AREA YOUTH DATA According to the Indiana Black Expo, Inc. (IBE) State of Our Black Youth report (2012), the report offers a statewide approach to key areas affecting Black youth and is a resource for the identification of barriers, promising practices, opportunities, and national comparisons. The report offers information essential in ensuring youth are given every opportunity to succeed. While this report highlights trends in the oveall Evansville area, the report is a helpful resource for the Center City. The upcoming 2020 Census will be critical in evaluating and comparing local systemic issues related to black youth and if local efforts are moving the needle.

Youth Trends in Evansville

• The city of Evansville showed a percentage decrease in teen births by Black females ages 15-19 from 2005 to 2008. • Evansville has experienced an increase in the percentage of Black families headed by single mothers and Black children ages 17 and under living in poverty. • Evansville has experienced an increase in the percentage of Black families headed by single mothers and Black children ages 17 and under living in poverty. In Evansville, 63.8% of Black families are headed by single mothers (2010)

04 • Additionally, there was an increase in low-weight and preterm births. Black juvenile delinquency case filings increased from 2006 to 2010.

Goals of the Community 1.

Area youth participate in local activities

Youth Employment Ministries prove positive for Center City

Natinally, 72% of Black children are now born to single mothers

Youth Delinquency Case Filings, 2010 Youth Justice

*Youth (Juvenile) Delinquency Case Filings: cases filed on behalf of children younger than 18 who were alleged to have committed an offense

STATE OF OUR BLACK YOUTH REPORT 2012

EVANSVILLE

Low Weight Births Health

52.8% of Black mothers received prenatal care in the 1st trimester (2008)

STATE OF OUR BLACK YOUTH REPORT 2012

Preterm Births

EVANSVILLE

Teen Births Children and Families

63.8% of Black families are headed by single mothers (2010)

10.7% of Black families are headed by single fathers (2010)

89.7% of Black babies are born to unmarried parents (2008)

All Families with Children, 2010

Black Families with Children, 2010

Single Mothers Married Couples Single Fathers

Percent (%) of Evansville families with children headed by married couples, single fathers, and single mothers Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

STATE OF OUR BLACK YOUTH REPORT 2012

EVANSVILLE

PILLAR GROUP | 04 - CULTURE OVERVIEW OF AREA CULTURE Working together to define a communities culture is important as communities compete to differentiate themselves against other neighborhoods in your city. A cultural cluster may include a neighborhoods ideas, creativity and styles of a community, traditional knowledge, credence, rites and customs, . The Baptisttown community has a rich background of unique identifiers to build from, including bicycle culture, housing, and now fresh food initiatives. The key is to build on those shared and productive techniques and integrate them into an overall shared identity. Your cultural capital can be the north star of how your community organizes and celebrates its past and future.

03 05

Current Cultural Trends • Since 2010, the Center City area has created many opportunities for programming and initiatives that touch on gardens and fresh food access.

• Charlie Wiggins is hands down one of Indiana's greatest heroes, yet a bicycle culture currently does not exist in his hometown? How can the Center City promote Canal Street as a future bicycle boulevard? • A new heritage trail has been dedicated in Evansville that traces the history of African-Americans in the Center City "Baptisttown" community. How can the community build on this trail tour?

Goals of the Community 1.

Evansville African American Museum held its first Baptist Town Festival

Memorial CDC employs youth from low to moderate income families

June 23, 2018 Charlie Wiggins was the latest subject to be honored by the Indiana Racing Memorial Association (IRMA)

Community Profile Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

2010 Population by Race/Ethnicity Total White Alone Black Alone American Indian Alone Asian Alone Pacific Islander Alone Some Other Race Alone Two or More Races Hispanic Origin Diversity Index 2018 Population by Race/Ethnicity Total White Alone Black Alone American Indian Alone Asian Alone Pacific Islander Alone Some Other Race Alone Two or More Races Hispanic Origin Diversity Index 2023 Population by Race/Ethnicity Total White Alone Black Alone American Indian Alone Asian Alone Pacific Islander Alone Some Other Race Alone Two or More Races Hispanic Origin Diversity Index 2010 Population by Relationship and Household Type Total In Households In Family Households Householder Spouse Child Other relative Nonrelative In Nonfamily Households In Group Quarters Institutionalized Population Noninstitutionalized Population

Prepared by Esri

5,046 36.2% 57.6% 0.3% 0.2% 0.0% 1.0% 4.6% 2.3% 55.9 4,886 33.9% 58.9% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 1.1% 5.5% 2.9% 56.5 4,839 32.2% 59.5% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 1.3% 6.4% 3.5% 57.3 5,046 92.8% 71.8% 21.3% 8.6% 33.9% 4.4% 3.6% 21.1% 7.2% 1.7% 5.5%

Data Note: Persons of Hispanic Origin may be of any race. The Diversity Index measures the probability that two people from the same area will be from different race/ ethnic groups. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2018 and 2023 Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 4 of 7

PILLAR GROUP | 05 - EDUCATION OVERVIEW OF AREA EDUCATION DATA A number of statistical studies detailing the status of African American youth reveal disturbing educational conditions and trends which are impeding progress toward full participation in mainstream of local society. For the Center City, Lincoln School is a public K-8 institution that feeds into Central High. The school used to be a source of pride for the city’s black community, and stepping stone to middle-class achievement as its graduates went on to become doctors, businesspeople and top athletes. Today, the school's "D" rating by the Indiana Department of Education is coupled with a 97% Free/Reduced Lunch statistic and 11:1 teacher to studnts ratio. With a number of options (voucher and charter) far from reach, parents and stakeholders are demanding change from the Evansville School Corporation to make change.

03 05

Current Evansville Education Trends • There was an increase in Black high school graduates in Evansville receiving Core 40 and Core 40 with Academic Honors diplomas. • 22.1% of Black students in Evansville are enrolled in special education programs (2012).

Goals of the Community

• The National Charter Collaborative, a nonprofit designed to create and support opportunities for charter school leaders of color, has to date identified more than 400 single-site schools in which people of color either lead the school and/or make up at least 30 percent of the board and leadership teams.

• Only 6.2% of EVV Black students are enrolled in gifted and talented programs

33.9% of Black females graduate with High School diploma or GED.

Historic Lincoln High (photo evansville Courier and Press) students celebrate

University of Evansville offers a Teaching Fellows Scholarship Program

High School Graduates with General, Honors, and Core 40 Diplomas Education

22.1% of Black students in special education programs (2012) Third Grade ISTEP Performance

VANDERBURGH COUNTY

6.2% of Black students in gifted and talented programs (2012)

INDIANA BLACK EXPO, INC.

Evansville Vanderburgh School Corp 2018 Annual Performance Report Lincoln School, Evansville 8251 School Results Indicator A-F Accountability Grade

'14-'15

'15-'16

State

'16-'17

'17-'18

Total

271

249

237

218

1,139,822

60,085

Percentage of Students Passing IREAD

81.3

62.1

74.1

52.2

86.6

* Grade 3 Percent Passing ISTEP+ Math Standard

24.0

20.6

33.3

18.2

59.3

* Grade 3 Percent Passing ISTEP+ Language Arts Standard

56.0

44.8

59.2

39.1

67.4

* Grade 4 Percent Passing ISTEP+ Math Standard

13.5

43.7

16.6

22.2

60.9

* Grade 4 Percent Passing ISTEP+ Language Arts Standard

33.3

37.5

39.1

33.3

63.8

* Grade 4 Percent Passing ISTEP+ Science Standard

19.4

18.7

20.8

11.1

57.6

* Grade 5 Percent Passing ISTEP+ Math Standard

18.5

11.1

36.8

30.4

65.6

* Grade 5 Percent Passing ISTEP+ Language Arts Standard

20.0

34.6

21.0

21.7

60.4

14.8

15.7

13.0

56.0

Student Enrollment Number of Certified Teachers

* Grade 5 Percent Passing ISTEP+ Social Science Standard * Grade 6 Percent Passing ISTEP+ Math Standard

19.4

25.8

20.8

47.6

57.9

* Grade 6 Percent Passing ISTEP+ Language Arts Standard

38.7

70.9

20.8

57.1

65.2

* Grade 6 Percent Passing ISTEP+ Science Standard

33.3

35.4

16.6

33.3

58.2

* Grade 7 Percent Passing ISTEP+ Math Standard

15.0

21.2

40.0

25.0

50.3

* Grade 7 Percent Passing ISTEP+ Language Arts Standard

70.0

45.4

36.0

47.8

64.3

36.3

32.0

29.2

61.4

* Grade 7 Percent Passing ISTEP+ Social Science Standard * Grade 8 Percent Passing ISTEP+ Math Standard

17.9

25.0

32.2

44.4

55.7

* Grade 8 Percent Passing ISTEP+ Language Arts Standard

39.3

50.0

35.4

59.3

63.6

***

46.2

38.2

Percent of 8th Graders in Algebra I Pupil Enrollment to Certified Employee Ratio Attendance Rate

7.5

7.6

13.5

97.5

97.1

97.0

97.3

95.3

* In 2014-15 Indiana transitioned to new, more rigorous college-and-career ready standards and a new statewide assessment to measure these standards. Therefore, results are not comparable to previous data. *** Suppressed 12 of 49

Evansville Vanderburgh School Corp 2018 Annual Performance Report Lincoln School, Evansville 8251 School Results Indicator

'14-'15

'15-'16

State

'16-'17

'17-'18

Total

Number of Students with More Than 10 Unexcused Days Absent

76,150

Number of Students absent greater than 10% of School Year

80423

96,436

5,749

104

65,437

Number of Students Suspended Number of Students Expelled or Suspended involving Drugs, Weapons, or Alcohol Number of Out of School Suspensions

*** Suppressed 13 of 49

SCENARIO PLANNING

SCENARIO PLANNING STRATEGY WHAT IS SCENARIO PLANNING According to the American Planning Associaton, "scenario planning enables professionals, and the public, to respond dynamically to an unknown future. It assists them with thinking, in advance, about the many ways the future may unfold and how they can be responsive, resilient, and effective, as the future becomes reality." Our w/purpose team used scenario planning as a tool to support decision-making that helps navigate the uncertainty of the future. A scenario planning process begins by evaluating current reality, projected trend forecasts, and influential factors to produce a set of plausible "what if" options. After several workshops and feedback we develop a set of "driving forces" and "critical uncertainties" that help support a preferred

scenario or a component of a scenario.

The process overall began with the community and professionals working together to share knowledge and know how around 1.) Driving Forces 2.) Critical Uncertainties. We have provided worksheets to help survey and mine critical information necessary to understand the variety of trends and data available.

DRIVING FORCES National Trends

RESEARCHING & LEARNING

■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■

Solar /Sustainability Weather Patterns /Global Warming District to promote identity Houses w/ small square footage Transportation / Shipping at regional scale

CRITICAL UNCERTAINTIES Local Factors

SHARING TOGETHER LOCALLY & HONESTLY

What factors “may” occur that would impact us locally

■■ ■■ ■■ ■■

Shift in political leadership More minority representation on City Council Health outcomes Job training, if major training company locates to area. i.e. Labor Union ■■ Education Change

SCENARIO PLANNING: THE PROCESS CRITICAL UNCERTAINTIES Key local issues that are both critical & uncertain

The development of a bussiness redevelopment areas with creative overlay zone. To promote mix development.

Redevelopment district with start organization of active residents.

Renting becomes the primary local housing types

Family and Youth services are expanded with new school options.

City grows toward Center City for unique infrastructure projects.

DRIVING FORCES Regional & National Trends

Regional draw due to coastal flooding

Immigrant population to area due to climate change

Education campus for health in Downtown grows. ..

Tiny House trend helps with home ownership

Conventions and business in regional area increases.

CRITICAL UNCERTANTIES A

The development of a business redevelopment areas with creative overlay zone. To promote mix development.

Redevelopment district with start organization of active residents.

Renting becomes the primary local housing option for residents

Family and Youth services are expanded with new school options.

City grows toward Center City for unique infrastructure projects.

DRIVING FORCES

Regional draw due to coastal flooding

ENERIO B SC

Immigrants population to area.

ENERIO A SC

Education campus for health in downtown grows.

Tiny House Village helps with home ownership.

5 Conventions and business in regional area increases.

SCENARIO A

SCENARIO “A” | BUSINESS CORRIDOR Cultural and Health Hub This option focuses on the Canal District by building around key anchoring institutions like the Evansville African American Museum, Memorial Community Development Plaza, and Lincoln School. An expanded Heritage Trail concept transforms Garvin Street and elevates its potential to be the business and cultural hub or center for the newly branded district. The scenario invites student and workforce housing development around a new Garvin Street that is a walkable experience complete with landscape medians, new bike and pedestrian infrastructure, and offstreet parking. The former grocery store location supports 40 new housing units while reinforcing the street edge along Lincoln Avenue with small business storefronts, a small gallery, and local food garden cafeteria.

WHAT IS UNIQUE ABOUT THIS SCENARIO IN 2023 • EVV African American Museum expansion with event center and 100 seat black box theater • 2 "Heritage Trail" micro parks will highlight and commemorate local heroes and history • Reformed Lincoln School attracts families and educators to the community. Health and technology magnet focus coupled with incentives for teachers to buy homes in community shifts education outcomes and school performance • Memorial CDC Plaza uses mix use housing development to bring workforce/student housing to the district. New site layout helps build street experience along Lincoln Avenue with storefront feel. • Garvin Street connects Walnut Street & Lincoln Avenue by undergoing "Complete Street" overhaul and becoming a unique place to live, work, and play.

POCKET PARK W/ FOUNTAINS

New Housing

SCENARIO “A” | BUSINESS CORRIDOR

WALNUT ST.

2 5

KEY 1

African American Museum

Parking Facility

Mixed-Use Development

New Townhomes

Event Center

Pocket Park

SCENARIO “A” | BUSINESS CORRIDOR JACOBSVILLE

WALLNUT STREETIMPROVEMENTS EEnhance Streets Enha Streetscape scape p pe Designatd gnatd d Bike Lane ane Traffic ffic Calmi Calming Calming Feautu Feau Feautures

PARKING

DOWNTOWN

MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT LLiving g Spaces Spa Sp paacess (housing housin using in upper floors) u us floo oo ors) s) Rental Offices Cultural Centers / Art rtt Studios di Commercial Retail

BELLEMEADE BAYARD

SCENARIO “A” | BUSINESS CORRIDOR OHIO RIVER

DOWNTOWN EVV

KEY 1

Housing / Retail

Bio-Retention Areas

Town Home

Pedestrian Greenway

Street Plaza

Existing Multi-Family Housing

SCENARIO “A” | BUSINESS CORRIDOR

NORTH VIEW OF GARVIN STREET BUSINESS CORRIDOR

SCENARIO B

SCENARIO “B” | RE-ALIGN GRID New Heritage Trail Park, Canal Greenway, and Urban Living Scenario B imagines a bold new Lincoln Avenue. Garvin Street and Elliot are re-aligned to support a higher density landuse that supports a growing downtown health sector and regional demand for downtown living. The plan includes a bicycle boulevard along Canal Street, which supports African American Art and unique outdoor gardens. Canal Street will be designed for bikes and pedestrians and promote native species plants, rain gardens, impervious pathways, and African American art. The sceme is anchored around a new Heritage Trail Park. The park is anchored by the existing museum, including parking and new gallery space along Linoln Avenue. The current Garvin Street is part of the experience by promoting "complete street" elements and programming to support a residential hub or health campus.

WHAT IS UNIQUE ABOUT THIS SCENARIO IN 2023 • African American Museum is physically rotated to realign Garvin Street to city street grid • Canal Street is transformed into a Bicycle Boulevard that goes directly to Downtown Evansville • Reformed Lincoln School attracts families and educators to the community. Health and technology Magnet focus coupled with incentives for teachers to buy homes in community shifts education outcomes and school performance. • Memorial CDC Plaza uses mix use housing strategy to bring workforce/student housing to the district. New site layout helps reinforce street experience along Lincoln Avenue w/ storefront fee. • Lincoln Avenue undergoes Complete Street transformation • The historic Lincoln Gardens original suburban (low density) model is upgraded to support higher density mixed use. Local quality of life is enhanced with new Heritage Trail Memorial Park

C N LI LN

IN RV

AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM & HERITAGE TRAIL PARK

MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL/ COMMERCIAL XX SQFT

VI N

MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL/ COMMERCIAL XX SQFT

LINCOLN SCHOOL

PUBLIC PLAZA & SCULPTURE

MIXED USE | WORKFORCE HOUSING, NON PROFIT, ART GALLERY, RESTAURANT, CREDIT UNION

SCENARIO “B” | RE-ALIGN GRID Re Align Garvin Street with existing street grid

GREEN HUB | PUBLIC ART | GATEWAY

ENHANCED STREET AND PEDESTRIAN INFRASTRUCTURE

Heritage Park & Public Art

Walnut Street Improvements will enhance existing streetscape with Bike Lanes, Enhanced Landscape Opportunities, and traffic calming

Extend Canal Greeway to continue develpment and transform industrial/residential mix to more formal mixed use product that will support residential community values

WALNUT STREET

AY NW

R LG

LINCOLN SCHOOL

AVE LINCOLN

3 Canal Street Bike/Pedestrian Boulevard - including Sustainable Water Infrastructure features.

SCENARIO “B” | CENTER CITY COMMERICAL HUB WALNUT STREET

6 6

LNU

3 7

LIN

T ST REE

5 G

KEY

LIN

Housing / Retail

Canal Street Greenway

Multi-Family/Mixed Use

Pedestrian Greenway

Evansville African American Museum

Existing Multi-Family Housing

Green Space

SCENARIO “B” | CENTER CITY COMMERICAL HUB

Lincoln Avenue Complete Street

Evansville African American Museum

Heritage Trail Park

Pocket Park

Lincoln Avenue

INTERSECTION OF GARVIN AND LINCOLN AVENUE

rvi

tr nS

ERSI DATA

ERSI DATA LIST • 2012 State of Our Black Youth Report (EVV) • Executive Summary • 2010 Census Profile • ACS Population Survey • Community Profile • Demographic and Income Comparison Profile • Dominant Tapestry Map • Household Income Profile

EVANSVILLE The trend table below reports two different trends: 1) Percent change (increase/decrease) in community between baseline year and most recent year; and 2) Percent difference (greater or less than) between community and Indiana. Arrows are used to depict increases/greater than (up) and decreases/less than (down). Colors are used to depict improved/better (blue) and worsened/worse (orange). The actual percentage change or difference is written in the arrow.

TOPIC

Children & Families

Economic Well-Being

BETTER

INDICATOR

Education2

Youth Justice

NO DATA

% change in Evansville between baseline and most recent year

% difference between Evansville and Indiana*

Black Teen Births

2005

-12.3

2008

+10.4

Black Families Headed by Single Mothers

2000

+3.1

2010

+10.6

Black Unemployment

2000

+4.3

2010

-20.8

Black Children in Poverty

2000

+25.3

2010

+30.5

Median Black Household Income

2000

+9.7

2010

-25.5

Black Infant Deaths (Infant Mortality)

Health

WORSE

Black Low-weight Births

2004

+40.3

2008

+28.4

Black Preterm Births

2004

+57.3

2008

+3.8

Black High School Graduates with Core 40/Honors Diplomas

2007

+38.0

2011

-31.5

Black 3rd Graders Passing Math ISTEP

2008

+20.3

2012

-24.3

Black 3rd Graders Passing English ISTEP

2008

+32.2

2012

-15.2

Black Juvenile Delinquency Case Filings1

2006

+39.3

2010

+68.9

1 Juvenile Delinquency Case Filings: cases filed on behalf of children younger than 18 who were alleged to have committed an offense 2 Education indicators are based on school year. E.g., School year 2008 is the school term beginning fall 2007 and ending summer 2008. *For most recent data year, unless otherwise noted ND = No comparable data.

STATE OF OUR BLACK YOUTH REPORT 2012

Trending Better The city showed a percentage decrease in teen births by Black females ages 15-19 from 2005 to 2008. The percentage of Black 3rd graders passing Math and English ISTEP increased from 2008 to 2012. There was also an increase in Black high school graduates receiving Core 40 and Core 40 with Academic Honors diplomas. Additionally, median Black household income increased from 2000 to 2010.

Trending Worse Evansville has experienced an increase in the percentage of Black families headed by single mothers and Black children ages 17 and under living in poverty. There was an increase in the cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Black unemployment rate from 2000 to 2010. Additionally, there was an increase in low-weight and preterm births. Black juvenile delinquency case filings increased from 2006 to 2010.

White Non-Hispanic

Other Race Non-Hispanic

Black Non-Hispanic

Hispanic

Number and percent of all Evansville youth ages 0-19 by race and ethnicity. The black youth population includes both non-Hispanic and Hispanic blacks. Non-Hispanic black youth and Hispanic black youth comprise 17.1% and 0.2% of the total youth population, respectively, and add up to 17.3% of the total youth population. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

17.3% of the total youth population are Black youth (2010)

VANDERBURGH COUNTY

INDIANA BLACK EXPO, INC.

EVANSVILLE

Current Year

Base Year

Children and Families Number of Black Males Ages 0-4

664

2010

671

2000

Number of Black Females Ages 0-4

689

2010

679

2000

Number of Black Males Ages 5-9

635

2010

636

2000

Number of Black Females Ages 5-9

597

2010

662

2000

Number of Black Males Ages 10-14

632

2010

599

2000

Number of Black Females Ages 10-14

640

2010

615

2000

Number of Black Males Ages 15-19

660

2010

531

2000

Number of Black Females Ages 15-19

571

2010

567

2000

Number of Black Males Ages 0-19

2,591

2010

2,437

2000

Number of Black Females Ages 0-19 Number of Black Teen (Age15-19) Births per 1,000 Black Females Ages 15-194

2,497

2010

2,523

2000

81.9

2008

93.4

2005

Percent of Black Families Headed by Married Parents

25.5%

2010

30.5%

2000

Percent of Black Families Headed by Single Fathers

10.7%

2010

7.6%

2000

Percent of Black Families Headed by Single Mothers

63.8%

2010

61.9%

2000

Percent of Black Babies Born to Unmarried Parents

89.7%

2008

83.3%

2004

14.5²

2010

13.9

2000

Economic Well-Being Black Unemployment Rate for Ages 16+*

$22,490¹

2010

$20,503

2000

Percent of Black Children Ages 0-17 in Poverty*

54.4%¹

2010

43.4%

2000

Percent of Black Households Owning their Home

32.2%

2010

37.6%

2000

217

2011

265

2007

3,245

2012

3,237

2008

0.5

2010

0.8

2007

Percent of Black 3rd Graders Passing English ISTEP

61.1%

2012

46.2%

2008

Percent of Black 3rd Graders Passing Math ISTEP

44.4%

2012

36.9%

2008

126

2011

121

2007

Median Black Household Income*

Monthly Average Number of Black Child Care Voucher Recipients per 1,000 Black Children Ages 0-12 Education Number of Black Children Enrolled in Public Schools Number of Black Children Enrolled in Accredited Nonpublic Schools per 1000 Black Children Ages 5-194

Number of Black Graduates per 1,000 Black Children Ages 15-19

VANDERBURGH COUNTY

INDIANA BLACK EXPO, INC.

EVANSVILLE

Current Year

Base Year

Percent of Blacks 25 and over with at least a HS diploma or Equivalent

76.5%ยน

2010

74.9%

2000

Percent of Black 9th Graders Graduating in Four Years

72.4%

2011

71.2%

2007

Percent of Black Graduates Planning to Attend Four Year College4

51.1%

2011

37.9%

2007

Percent of Black Graduates Planning to Attend Two Year College4

36.4%

2011

32.8%

2007

Percent of Black Graduates Planning to Attend 4 Vocational/Technical School

9.4%

2009

13.7%

2007

Number of Suspensions and Expulsions of Black Children per 1,000 Black Children Enrolled in Public School

544

2011

513

2007

Number of Black Dropouts per 1,000 Black Children Ages 15-194

40.5

2011

34.3

2007

22.1%

2012

23.8%

2007

6.2%

2012

4.2%

2007

42.3%

2011

27.3%

2007

Percent of Black Graduates Earning an Honors Diploma4

8.2%

2011

9.3%

2007

Percent of Black Graduates Earning a General Diploma4

49.5%

2011

63.4%

2007

Number of Black Child and Teen Deaths per 1,000 Black Children Ages 0-194

2008

0.5

2004

Number of Black Infant Deaths per 1,000 Black Live Births (Infant Mortality)4

2008

22.1

2004

Percent of Black Babies Born Low Birthweight

18.1%

2008

12.9%

2004

Percent of Black Babies Born Preterm

16.2%

2008

10.3%

2004

Percent of Black Mothers Receiving Prenatal Care in the 1st Trimester

52.8%

2008

50.9%

2007

Percent of Black Mothers who Reported Smoking During Pregnancy

21.4%

2008

20.5%

2004

Percent of Black Students in Special Education Programs Percent of Black Students in Gifted and Talented Programs4 Percent of Black Graduates Earning a Core 40 Diploma4

Health

STATE OF OUR BLACK YOUTH REPORT 2012

EVANSVILLE

Current Year

Base Year

Number of Black Teen Male Gonorrhea Cases per 1,000 Black Males Ages 15-194

55.1

2011

39.9

2006

Number of Black Teen Female Gonorrhea Cases per 1,000 Black Females Ages 15-194

25.9

2011

25.0

2006

Number of Black Teen Male Chlamydia Cases per 1,000 Black Males Ages 15-194

55.1

2011

49.8

2006

Number of Black Teen Female Chlamydia Cases per 1,000 Black Females Ages 15-194

129

2011

78.1

2006

Black Males who are HIV Positive per 1,000 Black Males (Prevalence)4

8.3

2011

6.3

2007

Black Females who are HIV Positive per 1,000 Black Females (Prevalence)4

2.5

2011

2.0

2007

Number of Black Children under 6 Screened for Elevated Blood Lead Levels per 1,000 Black Children under 6

277

2011

331

2007

0.9%

2010

1.4%

2008

26.1

2010

13.2

2006

Number of Juvenile Deliquency Case Filings for Black Children per 1,000 Black Children Ages 10-17

110

2010

79.2

2006

Number of Juvenile Status Case Filings for Black Children per 1,000 Black Children Ages 10-174

11.4

2010

12.8

2006

Number of Black Juvenile Commitments to the Department of Correction per 1,000 Black Children Ages 10-174

15.1

2011

12.4

2008

Percent of Black Children who were Screened for Lead with Confirmed Elevated Blood Lead Levels4 Child Abuse and Neglect Number of Juvenile CHINS Case Filings for Black Children per 1,000 Black Children Ages 0-194 Youth Justice

*Margins-of-Error 1 This U.S. Census American Community Survey estimate considered reliable 2 This U.S. Census American Community Survey estimate considered somewhat reliable, use with caution 3 This U.S. Census American Community Survey estimate considered unreliable 4 Use caution interpreting these data as they may be based on small numbers (less than 20 cases) that can lead to unstable rates. Refer to the original sources listed in the Data Definitions section of this report to determine which data are unstable.

VANDERBURGH COUNTY

INDIANA BLACK EXPO, INC.

Executive Summary Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

Population 2000 Population 2010 Population 2018 Population 2023 Population 2000-2010 Annual Rate 2010-2018 Annual Rate 2018-2023 Annual Rate 2018 Male Population 2018 Female Population 2018 Median Age

5,140 5,046 4,886 4,839 -0.18% -0.39% -0.19% 46.8% 53.2% 36.2

In the identified area, the current year population is 4,886. In 2010, the Census count in the area was 5,046. The rate of change since 2010 was -0.39% annually. The five-year projection for the population in the area is 4,839 representing a change of -0.19% annually from 2018 to 2023. Currently, the population is 46.8% male and 53.2% female. Median Age The median age in this area is 36.2, compared to U.S. median age of 38.3. Race and Ethnicity 2018 White Alone 2018 Black Alone

33.9% 58.9%

2018 American Indian/Alaska Native Alone

0.3%

2018 Asian Alone

0.3%

2018 Pacific Islander Alone

0.0%

2018 Other Race

1.1%

2018 Two or More Races

5.5%

2018 Hispanic Origin (Any Race)

2.9%

Persons of Hispanic origin represent 2.9% of the population in the identified area compared to 18.3% of the U.S. population. Persons of Hispanic Origin may be of any race. The Diversity Index, which measures the probability that two people from the same area will be from different race/ethnic groups, is 56.5 in the identified area, compared to 64.3 for the U.S. as a whole. Households 2000 Households

1,963

2010 Households

1,879

2018 Total Households

1,794

2023 Total Households

1,766

2000-2010 Annual Rate

-0.44%

2010-2018 Annual Rate

-0.56%

2018-2023 Annual Rate

-0.31%

2018 Average Household Size

2.52

The household count in this area has changed from 1,879 in 2010 to 1,794 in the current year, a change of -0.56% annually. The five-year projection of households is 1,766, a change of -0.31% annually from the current year total. Average household size is currently 2.52, compared to 2.49 in the year 2010. The number of families in the current year is 983 in the specified area.

Data Note: Income is expressed in current dollars Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2018 and 2023. Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 1 of 2

Executive Summary Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

Median Household Income 2018 Median Household Income 2023 Median Household Income 2018-2023 Annual Rate Average Household Income

$26,572 $30,417 2.74%

2018 Average Household Income 2023 Average Household Income 2018-2023 Annual Rate Per Capita Income

$38,769 $45,461 3.24%

2018 Per Capita Income 2023 Per Capita Income 2018-2023 Annual Rate

$16,349 $18,918 2.96%

Households by Income Current median household income is $26,572 in the area, compared to $58,100 for all U.S. households. Median household income is projected to be $30,417 in five years, compared to $65,727 for all U.S. households Current average household income is $38,769 in this area, compared to $83,694 for all U.S. households. Average household income is projected to be $45,461 in five years, compared to $96,109 for all U.S. households Current per capita income is $16,349 in the area, compared to the U.S. per capita income of $31,950. The per capita income is projected to be $18,918 in five years, compared to $36,530 for all U.S. households Housing 2000 Total Housing Units 2000 Owner Occupied Housing Units 2000 Renter Occupied Housing Units 2000 Vacant Housing Units 2010 Total Housing Units 2010 Owner Occupied Housing Units 2010 Renter Occupied Housing Units 2010 Vacant Housing Units 2018 Total Housing Units 2018 Owner Occupied Housing Units 2018 Renter Occupied Housing Units 2018 Vacant Housing Units 2023 Total Housing Units 2023 Owner Occupied Housing Units 2023 Renter Occupied Housing Units 2023 Vacant Housing Units

2,385 1,065 898 422 2,414 866 1,013 535 2,415 763 1,031 621 2,427 770 996 661

Currently, 31.6% of the 2,415 housing units in the area are owner occupied; 42.7%, renter occupied; and 25.7% are vacant. Currently, in the U.S., 56.0% of the housing units in the area are owner occupied; 32.8% are renter occupied; and 11.2% are vacant. In 2010, there were 2,414 housing units in the area - 35.9% owner occupied, 42.0% renter occupied, and 22.2% vacant. The annual rate of change in housing units since 2010 is 0.02%. Median home value in the area is $67,333, compared to a median home value of $218,492 for the U.S. In five years, median value is projected to change by 1.41% annually to $72,222.

Data Note: Income is expressed in current dollars Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2018 and 2023. Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 2 of 2

2010 Census Profile Prepared by Esri

Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

2000-2010 2010 5,046 1,879 2,414

Annual Rate -0.18% -0.44% 0.12%

Number 5,046 4,812 1,829 2,904 17 12 1 49 234

Percent 100.0% 95.4% 36.2% 57.6% 0.3% 0.2% 0.0% 1.0% 4.6%

118

2.3%

Population by Sex Male Female

2,370 2,676

47.0% 53.0%

Population by Age Total Age 0 - 4 Age 5 - 9 Age 10 - 14 Age 15 - 19 Age 20 - 24 Age 25 - 29 Age 30 - 34 Age 35 - 39 Age 40 - 44 Age 45 - 49 Age 50 - 54 Age 55 - 59 Age 60 - 64 Age 65 - 69 Age 70 - 74 Age 75 - 79 Age 80 - 84 Age 85+

5,044 390 388 377 372 346 351 297 278 287 353 337 320 261 189 160 122 95 124

100.0% 7.7% 7.7% 7.5% 7.4% 6.9% 7.0% 5.9% 5.5% 5.7% 7.0% 6.7% 6.3% 5.2% 3.7% 3.2% 2.4% 1.9% 2.5%

3,670 690

72.7% 13.7%

Population Households Housing Units

2000 5,140 1,963 2,385

Population by Race Total Population Reporting One Race White Black American Indian Asian Pacific Islander Some Other Race Population Reporting Two or More Races Total Hispanic Population

Age 18+ Age 65+

Data Note: Hispanic population can be of any race. Census 2010 medians are computed from reported data distributions. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 1 of 4

2010 Census Profile Prepared by Esri

Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Households by Type Total Households with 1 Person Households with 2+ People Family Households Husband-wife Families With Own Children Other Family (No Spouse Present) With Own Children Nonfamily Households All Households with Children Multigenerational Households Unmarried Partner Households Male-female Same-sex Average Household Size

1,879 706 1,173 1,051 417 154 634 357 122

100.0% 37.6% 62.4% 55.9% 22.2% 8.2% 33.7% 19.0% 6.5%

627 97 162 147 15

33.4% 5.2% 8.6% 7.8% 0.8%

2.49

Family Households by Size Total

1,051

100.0%

2 People

380

36.2%

3 People

279

26.5%

4 People

189

18.0%

5 People

108

10.3%

6 People

4.4%

7+ People

4.7%

Average Family Size Nonfamily Households by Size Total 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7+ People Average Nonfamily Size Population by Relationship and Household Type Total In Households In Family Households Householder Spouse Child Other relative Nonrelative In Nonfamily Households In Group Quarters Institutionalized Population Noninstitutionalized Population

3.27

828

100.0%

706 96 18 2 3 2

85.3% 11.6% 2.2% 0.2% 0.4% 0.2%

1 1.28

0.1%

5,046 4,684 3,621 1,074 433 1,711 223 180 1,063 362 85 277

100.0% 92.8% 71.8% 21.3% 8.6% 33.9% 4.4% 3.6% 21.1% 7.2% 1.7% 5.5%

Data Note: Households with children include any households with people under age 18, related or not. Multigenerational households are families with 3 or more parent-child relationships. Unmarried partner households are usually classified as nonfamily households unless there is another member of the household related to the householder. Multigenerational and unmarried partner households are reported only to the tract level. Esri estimated block group data, which is used to estimate polygons or non-standard geography. Average family size excludes nonrelatives. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 2 of 4

2010 Census Profile Prepared by Esri

Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Family Households by Age of Householder Total Householder Age 15 - 44

1,051 504 211 147 107 82

100.0% 48.0%

828

100.0%

201 166 203 127 131

24.3% 20.0% 24.5% 15.3% 15.8%

1,879 671 1,153 8 5 1 7 34 27

100.0% 35.7% 61.4% 0.4% 0.3% 0.1% 0.4% 1.8% 1.4%

418

100.0%

182 224 2

43.5% 53.6% 0.5%

1 1 3 5 9

0.2% 0.2% 0.7% 1.2% 2.2%

Householder is White Alone Householder is Black Alone Householder is American Indian Alone Householder is Asian Alone Householder is Pacific Islander Alone Householder is Some Other Race Alone Householder is Two or More Races Other Families with Hispanic Householder

635 160 455 2 2 0 2 14 8

100.0% 25.2% 71.7% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% 2.2% 1.3%

Nonfamily Households by Race of Householder Total Householder is White Alone Householder is Black Alone Householder is American Indian Alone Householder is Asian Alone Householder is Pacific Islander Alone Householder is Some Other Race Alone Householder is Two or More Races Nonfamily Households with Hispanic Householder

828 329 474 4 3 0 2 16 10

100.0% 39.7% 57.2% 0.5% 0.4% 0.0% 0.2% 1.9% 1.2%

Householder Householder Householder Householder

Age Age Age Age

45 - 54 55 - 64 65 - 74 75+

Nonfamily Households by Age of Householder Total Householder Householder Householder Householder Householder

Age Age Age Age Age

15 45 55 65 75+

44 54 64 74

Households by Race of Householder Total Householder is White Alone Householder is Black Alone Householder is American Indian Alone Householder is Asian Alone Householder is Pacific Islander Alone Householder is Some Other Race Alone Householder is Two or More Races Households with Hispanic Householder Husband-wife Families by Race of Householder Total Householder is White Alone Householder is Black Alone Householder is American Indian Alone Householder is Asian Alone Householder is Pacific Islander Alone Householder is Some Other Race Alone Householder is Two or More Races Husband-wife Families with Hispanic Householder Other Families (No Spouse) by Race of Householder Total

20.1% 14.0% 10.2% 7.8%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 3 of 4

2010 Census Profile Prepared by Esri

Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Total Housing Units by Occupancy Total Occupied Housing Units Vacant Housing Units

2,398 1,879

100.0% 78.4%

200 4 93 13 5 0

8.3% 0.2% 3.9% 0.5% 0.2% 0.0%

204 22.2%

8.5%

1,879 866 608 258 2.48 1,013 2.51

100.0% 46.1% 32.4% 13.7%

Owner-occupied Housing Units by Race of Householder Total Householder is White Alone

867 300

100.0% 34.6%

Householder is Black Alone Householder is American Indian Alone Householder is Asian Alone Householder is Pacific Islander Alone Householder is Some Other Race Alone Householder is Two or More Races Owner-occupied Housing Units with Hispanic Householder

552 3 1 1 1 9 10

63.7% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 1.0% 1.2%

1,012

100.0%

371 601 5 4 0 6 25 17

36.7% 59.4% 0.5% 0.4% 0.0% 0.6% 2.5% 1.7%

For Rent Rented, not Occupied For Sale Only Sold, not Occupied For Seasonal/Recreational/Occasional Use For Migrant Workers Other Vacant Total Vacancy Rate Households by Tenure and Mortgage Status Total Owner Occupied Owned with a Mortgage/Loan Owned Free and Clear Average Household Size Renter Occupied Average Household Size

Renter-occupied Housing Units by Race of Householder Total Householder is White Alone Householder is Black Alone Householder is American Indian Alone Householder is Asian Alone Householder is Pacific Islander Alone Householder is Some Other Race Alone Householder is Two or More Races Renter-occupied Housing Units with Hispanic Householder Average Household Size by Race/Hispanic Origin of Householder Householder is White Alone Householder is Black Alone Householder is American Indian Alone Householder is Asian Alone Householder is Pacific Islander Alone Householder is Some Other Race Alone Householder is Two or More Races Householder is Hispanic

53.9%

2.59 2.44 2.38 2.20 3.00 3.57 2.50 3.30

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 4 of 4

ACS Population Summary Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

2012 - 2016 ACS Estimate

Percent

MOE(±)

Reliability

TOTALS Total Population

4,491

320

Total Households

1,827

105

Total Housing Units

2,449

104

POPULATION AGE 3+ YEARS BY SCHOOL ENROLLMENT Total Enrolled in school Enrolled in nursery school, preschool Public school Private school Enrolled in kindergarten Public school Private school Enrolled in grade 1 to grade 4 Public school Private school Enrolled in grade 5 to grade 8 Public school Private school Enrolled in grade 9 to grade 12 Public school Private school Enrolled in college undergraduate years Public school Private school Enrolled in graduate or professional school Public school Private school Not enrolled in school

4,300

100.0%

305

1,152

26.8%

152

1.9%

1.8%

0.1%

1.5%

0.0%

179

4.2%

155

3.6%

0.6%

287

6.7%

266

6.2%

0.5%

288

6.7%

286

6.7%

0.1%

220

5.1%

189

4.4%

0.7%

1 3,149

0.0% 73.2%

1 210

POPULATION AGE 65+ BY RELATIONSHIP AND HOUSEHOLD TYPE Total

625

100.0%

Living in Households

555

88.8%

Living in Family Households

303

48.5%

210

33.6%

9.6%

2.1%

Parent-in-law

0.8%

Other Relative

0.6%

1.8%

252

40.3%

251

40.2%

0.2%

11.2%

Householder Spouse Parent

Nonrelative Living in Nonfamily Households Householder Nonrelative Living in Group Quarters

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey

Reliability:

high

medium

low

Page 1 of 7

ACS Population Summary Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

2012 - 2016 ACS Estimate

Percent

MOE(±)

Reliability

HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE AND SIZE AND AGE Family Households

934

51.1%

2-Person

364

19.9%

3-Person

247

13.5%

4-Person

186

10.2%

5-Person

4.5%

6-Person

1.6%

7+ Person

1.4%

893

48.9%

1-Person

787

43.1%

2-Person

5.1%

3-Person

0.5%

4-Person

0.2%

5-Person

0.0%

6-Person 7+ Person

0 0

0.0% 0.0%

0 0

524 524 179 69 276 0 1,303 262 148 893

28.7% 28.7% 9.8% 3.8% 15.1% 0.0% 71.3% 14.3% 8.1% 48.9%

70 70 40 34 56 0 102 55 47 83

486 240 242 4 1,341 547 692 102

26.6% 13.1% 13.2% 0.2% 73.4% 29.9% 37.9% 5.6%

53 33 55 6 100 76 75 28

Nonfamily Households

HOUSEHOLDS BY PRESENCE OF PEOPLE UNDER 18 YEARS BY HOUSEHOLD TYPE

Households with one or more people under 18 years Family households Married-couple family Male householder, no wife present Female householder, no husband present Nonfamily households Households with no people under 18 years Married-couple family Other family Nonfamily households HOUSEHOLDS BY PRESENCE OF PEOPLE 65 YEARS AND OVER, HOUSEHOLD SIZE AND HOUSEHOLD TYPE

Households with Pop 65+ 1-Person 2+ Person Family 2+ Person Nonfamily Households with No Pop 65+ 1-Person 2+ Person Family 2+ Person Nonfamily

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey

Reliability:

high

medium

low

Page 2 of 7

ACS Population Summary Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

2012 - 2016 ACS Estimate

Percent

MOE(±)

4,161

100.0%

298

708 4

17.0% 0.1%

107 6

4 0

0.1% 0.0%

6 0

0 0

0.0% 0.0%

0 0

0.0% 0.0%

0 0

0.0% 0.0%

0 0

0.0% 0.0%

0 0

0.0% 0.0%

0 0

0.0% 0.0%

0 0

0.0%

2,761 29

66.4% 0.7%

246 21

25 3

0.6% 0.1%

20 5

0 26

0.0% 0.6%

0 20

23 0

0.6% 0.0%

20 0

4 8

0.1% 0.2%

5 14

2 6

0.0% 0.1%

11 10

0 0

0.0% 0.0%

0 0

0.0% 0.0%

0 0

0.0%

623

15.0%

0 0

0.0% 0.0%

0 0

0.0% 0.0%

0 0

2 1

0.0% 0.0%

2 1

0 1

0.0% 0.0%

0 1

0 0

0.0% 0.0%

0 0

0 0 0

0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

0 0 0

0 0

0.0% 0.0%

0 0

0.0%

Reliability

POPULATION AGE 5+ YEARS BY LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME AND ABILITY TO SPEAK ENGLISH Total 5 to 17 years Speak only English Speak Spanish Speak English "very well" or "well" Speak English "not well" Speak English "not at all" Speak other Indo-European languages Speak English "very well" or "well" Speak English "not well" Speak English "not at all" Speak Asian and Pacific Island languages Speak English "very well" or "well" Speak English "not well" Speak English "not at all" Speak other languages Speak English "very well" or "well" Speak English "not well" Speak English "not at all" 18 to 64 years Speak only English Speak Spanish Speak English "very well" or "well" Speak English "not well" Speak English "not at all" Speak other Indo-European languages Speak English "very well" or "well" Speak English "not well" Speak English "not at all" Speak Asian and Pacific Island languages Speak English "very well" or "well" Speak English "not well" Speak English "not at all" Speak other languages Speak English "very well" or "well" Speak English "not well" Speak English "not at all" 65 years and over Speak only English Speak Spanish Speak English "very well" or "well" Speak English "not well" Speak English "not at all" Speak other Indo-European languages Speak English "very well" or "well" Speak English "not well" Speak English "not at all" Speak Asian and Pacific Island languages Speak English "very well" or "well" Speak English "not well" Speak English "not at all" Speak other languages Speak English "very well" or "well" Speak English "not well" Speak English "not at all"

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey

Reliability:

high

medium

low

Page 3 of 7

ACS Population Summary Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

2012 - 2016 ACS Estimate

Percent

1,682

100.0%

177

1,533

91.1%

176

122

7.3%

1.6%

1,682

100.0%

177

1,223

72.7%

Carpooled

165

9.8%

Public transportation (excluding taxicab)

231

13.7%

119

MOE(±)

Reliability

WORKERS AGE 16+ YEARS BY PLACE OF WORK Total Worked in state and in county of residence Worked in state and outside county of residence Worked outside state of residence WORKERS AGE 16+ YEARS BY MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION TO WORK Total Drove alone

Bus or trolley bus

231

13.7%

119

Streetcar or trolley car

0.0%

Subway or elevated

0.0%

Railroad

0.0%

Ferryboat

0.0%

Taxicab

0.0%

Motorcycle

0.0%

Bicycle

1.0%

Walked

1.5%

Other means

0.8%

0.5%

1,674

100.0%

177

1.7%

5 to 9 minutes

217

13.0%

10 to 14 minutes

381

22.8%

15 to 19 minutes

357

21.3%

20 to 24 minutes

248

14.8%

25 to 29 minutes

3.5%

30 to 34 minutes

181

10.8%

35 to 39 minutes

1.4%

40 to 44 minutes 45 to 59 minutes

4.2%

3.6%

60 to 89 minutes

1.1%

90 or more minutes

1.7%

Worked at home WORKERS AGE 16+ YEARS (WHO DID NOT WORK FROM HOME) BY TRAVEL TIME TO WORK Total Less than 5 minutes

Average Travel Time to Work (in minutes)

N/A

FEMALES AGE 20-64 YEARS BY AGE OF OWN CHILDREN AND EMPLOYMENT STATUS 1,323 Total Own children under 6 years only 122 73 In labor force Not in labor force 49 130 Own children under 6 years and 6 to 17 years In labor force 60 70 Not in labor force Own children 6 to 17 years only 220 187 In labor force Not in labor force 34 850 No own children under 18 years In labor force 576 Not in labor force 274 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey

N/A

100.0% 9.2% 5.5% 3.7% 9.8% 4.5% 5.3% 16.6% 14.1% 2.6% 64.2% 43.5% 20.7%

Reliability:

high

112 34 22 29 33 19 29 62 61 12 97 90 49

medium

low

Page 4 of 7

ACS Population Summary Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

2012 - 2016 ACS Estimate

Percent

4,401

100.0%

320

1,041

23.7%

139

MOE(±)

Reliability

CIVILIAN NONINSTITUTIONALIZED POPULATION BY AGE & TYPES COVERAGE OHEALINSURANCE OF HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE Total Under 18 years: One Type of Health Insurance:

933

21.2%

131

Employer-Based Health Ins Only

215

4.9%

Direct-Purchase Health Ins Only

0.6%

Medicare Coverage Only

0.0%

Medicaid Coverage Only

691

15.7%

105

TRICARE/Military Hlth Cov Only

0.0%

VA Health Care Only

0.0%

0.9%

2+ Types of Health Insurance No Health Insurance Coverage 18 to 34 years: One Type of Health Insurance:

1.5%

982

22.3%

134

613

13.9%

Employer-Based Health Ins Only

279

6.3%

Direct-Purchase Health Ins Only

0.8%

Medicare Coverage Only

0.2%

Medicaid Coverage Only

276

6.3%

0.0%

0.3%

16 30

TRICARE/Military Hlth Cov Only VA Health Care Only 2+ Types of Health Insurance No Health Insurance Coverage 35 to 64 years: One Type of Health Insurance:

1.4%

308

7.0%

1,823

41.4%

156

1,129

25.7%

145

Employer-Based Health Ins Only

617

14.0%

Direct-Purchase Health Ins Only

1.6%

Medicare Coverage Only

1.2%

Medicaid Coverage Only

332

7.5%

TRICARE/Military Hlth Cov Only

0.2%

VA Health Care Only

1.1%

2+ Types of Health Insurance

265

6.0%

No Health Insurance Coverage

429

9.7%

65+ years:

555

12.6%

214

4.9%

Employer-Based Health Ins Only

0.1%

Direct-Purchase Health Ins Only

0.0%

209

4.7%

TRICARE/Military Hlth Cov Only

0.0%

VA Health Care Only

0.0%

341

7.7%

One Type of Health Insurance:

Medicare Coverage Only

2+ Types of Health Insurance: Employer-Based & Direct-Purchase Health Insurance

0.0%

Employer-Based Health & Medicare Insurance

0.6%

Direct-Purchase Health & Medicare Insurance

109

2.5%

2.1%

0.0%

Other Public Health Insurance Combos

0.5%

Other Health Insurance Combinations

2.0%

0.0%

Medicare & Medicaid Coverage Other Private Health Insurance Combos

No Health Insurance Coverage

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey

Reliability:

high

medium

low

Page 5 of 7

ACS Population Summary Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

2012 - 2016 ACS Estimate

Percent

MOE(±)

Reliability

POPULATION BY RATIO OF INCOME TO POVERTY LEVEL Total

4,389

100.0%

320

Under .50

738

16.8%

170

.50 to .99

1,001

22.8%

194

1.00 to 1.24

403

9.2%

122

1.25 to 1.49

368

8.4%

118

1.50 to 1.84

417

9.5%

1.85 to 1.99

93 1,369

2.1%

31.2%

195

3,449

100.0%

259

348

10.1%

3,101

89.9%

253

1,589

46.1%

139

322

9.3%

1,267

36.7%

126

1,860

53.9%

184

0.8%

1,834

53.2%

183

2.00 and over CIVILIAN POPULATION AGE 18 OR OLDER BY VETERAN STATUS Total Veteran Nonveteran Male Veteran Nonveteran Female Veteran Nonveteran CIVILIAN VETERANS AGE 18 OR OLDER BY PERIOD OF MILITARY SERVICE

348

100.0%

Gulf War (9/01 or later), no Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01), no Vietnam Era

8.3%

Gulf War (9/01 or later) and Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01), no Vietnam Era

0.0%

Gulf War (9/01 or later), and Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01), and Vietnam Era

0.0%

7.8%

Total

Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01), no Vietnam Era Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01) and Vietnam Era

2.0%

Vietnam Era, no Korean War, no World War II

127

36.5%

Vietnam Era and Korean War, no World War II

3.4%

0.0%

7.2%

Vietnam Era and Korean War and World War II Korean War, no Vietnam Era, no World War II Korean War and World War II, no Vietnam Era

0.0%

World War II, no Korean War, no Vietnam Era

8.6%

Between Gulf War and Vietnam Era only

15.2%

Between Vietnam Era and Korean War only

10.9%

Between Korean War and World War II only

0.0%

Pre-World War II only

0.0%

1,827

100.0%

105

631

34.5%

Married-couple family

5.1%

Other family - male householder (no wife present)

2.0%

Other family - female householder (no husband present)

225

12.3%

Nonfamily household - male householder

142

7.8%

Nonfamily household - female householder

136

7.4%

1,196

65.5%

348

19.0%

2.8%

Other family - female householder (no husband present)

182

10.0%

Nonfamily household - male householder

303

16.6%

Nonfamily household - female householder

311

17.0%

HOUSEHOLDS BY POVERTY STATUS Total Income in the past 12 months below poverty level

Income in the past 12 months at or above poverty level Married-couple family Other family - male householder (no wife present)

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey

Reliability:

high

medium

low

Page 6 of 7

ACS Population Summary Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

2012 - 2016 ACS Estimate

Percent

MOE(Âą)

Reliability

HOUSEHOLDS BY OTHER INCOME Social Security Income No Social Security Income Retirement Income No Retirement Income

671

36.7%

1,156

63.3%

340

18.6%

1,487

81.4%

108

GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS <10% of Income

2.9%

10-14.9% of Income

9.2%

15-19.9% of Income

3.2%

20-24.9% of Income

9.4%

25-29.9% of Income

117

11.6%

30-34.9% of Income

6.4%

35-39.9% of Income

8.8%

40-49.9% of Income

110

10.9%

50+% of Income

272

27.0%

Gross Rent % Inc Not Computed

103

10.2%

1,827

HOUSEHOLDS BY PUBLIC ASSISTANCE INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS Total With public assistance income No public assistance income

60 1,767

100.0% 3.3% 96.7%

105 15 107

HOUSEHOLDS BY FOOD STAMPS/SNAP STATUS Total With Food Stamps/SNAP With No Food Stamps/SNAP

1,827 643 1,184

100.0% 35.2% 64.8%

105 67 97

HOUSEHOLDS BY DISABILITY STATUS Total With 1+ Persons w/Disability With No Person w/Disability

1,827 757 1,070

100.0% 41.4% 58.6%

105 75 98

Data Note: N/A means not available. Population by Ratio of Income to Poverty Level represents persons for whom poverty status is determined. Household income represents income in 2014, adjusted for inflation. 2012-2016 ACS Estimate: The American Community Survey (ACS) replaces census sample data. Esri is releasing the 2012-2016 ACS estimates, five-year period data collected monthly from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2014. Although the ACS includes many of the subjects previously covered by the decennial census sample, there are significant differences between the two surveys including fundamental differences in survey design and residency rules. Margin of error (MOE): The MOE is a measure of the variability of the estimate due to sampling error. MOEs enable the data user to measure the range of uncertainty for each estimate with 90 percent confidence. The range of uncertainty is called the confidence interval, and it is calculated by taking the estimate +/- the MOE. For example, if the ACS reports an estimate of 100 with an MOE of +/- 20, then you can be 90 percent certain the value for the whole population falls between 80 and 120. Reliability: These symbols represent threshold values that Esri has established from the Coefficients of Variation (CV) to designate the usability of the estimates. The CV measures the amount of sampling error relative to the size of the estimate, expressed as a percentage. High Reliability: Small CVs (less than or equal to 12 percent) are flagged green to indicate that the sampling error is small relative to the estimate and the estimate is reasonably reliable. Medium Reliability: Estimates with CVs between 12 and 40 are flagged yellow-use with caution. Low Reliability: Large CVs (over 40 percent) are flagged red to indicate that the sampling error is large relative to the estimate. The estimate is considered very unreliable. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey

Reliability:

high

medium

low

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 7 of 7

Community Profile Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

2018 Households by Income Household Income Base <$15,000 $15,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 $150,000 - $199,999 $200,000+ Average Household Income 2023 Households by Income Household Income Base <$15,000 $15,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 $150,000 - $199,999 $200,000+ Average Household Income 2018 Owner Occupied Housing Units by Value Total <$50,000 $50,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 $150,000 - $199,999 $200,000 - $249,999 $250,000 - $299,999 $300,000 - $399,999 $400,000 - $499,999 $500,000 - $749,999 $750,000 - $999,999 $1,000,000 - $1,499,999 $1,500,000 - $1,999,999 $2,000,000 + Average Home Value 2023 Owner Occupied Housing Units by Value Total <$50,000 $50,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 $150,000 - $199,999 $200,000 - $249,999 $250,000 - $299,999 $300,000 - $399,999 $400,000 - $499,999 $500,000 - $749,999 $750,000 - $999,999 $1,000,000 - $1,499,999 $1,500,000 - $1,999,999 $2,000,000 + Average Home Value

Prepared by Esri

1,794 29.8% 17.6% 13.0% 15.2% 11.7% 5.2% 5.8% 1.2% 0.5% $38,769 1,766 25.8% 16.8% 12.2% 15.5% 13.1% 6.3% 8.2% 1.6% 0.6% $45,461 763 29.6% 59.0% 6.3% 2.8% 0.4% 0.3% 0.4% 0.0% 1.2% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% $77,847 770 24.5% 57.3% 7.5% 4.2% 0.6% 0.6% 2.2% 0.9% 1.8% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% $94,968

Data Note: Income represents the preceding year, expressed in current dollars. Household income includes wage and salary earnings, interest dividends, net rents, pensions, SSI and welfare payments, child support, and alimony. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2018 and 2023 Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 2 of 7

Community Profile Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

Population Summary 2000 Total Population 2010 Total Population 2018 Total Population 2018 Group Quarters 2023 Total Population 2018-2023 Annual Rate 2018 Total Daytime Population Workers Residents Household Summary

5,140 5,046 4,886 363 4,839 -0.19% 5,818 2,858 2,960

2000 Households 2000 Average Household Size 2010 Households 2010 Average Household Size 2018 Households 2018 Average Household Size 2023 Households 2023 Average Household Size 2018-2023 Annual Rate 2010 Families 2010 Average Family Size 2018 Families 2018 Average Family Size 2023 Families 2023 Average Family Size 2018-2023 Annual Rate Housing Unit Summary

1,963 2.50 1,879 2.49 1,794 2.52 1,766 2.53 -0.31% 1,051 3.27 983 3.30 960 3.31 -0.47%

2000 Housing Units Owner Occupied Housing Units Renter Occupied Housing Units Vacant Housing Units 2010 Housing Units Owner Occupied Housing Units Renter Occupied Housing Units Vacant Housing Units 2018 Housing Units Owner Occupied Housing Units Renter Occupied Housing Units Vacant Housing Units 2023 Housing Units Owner Occupied Housing Units Renter Occupied Housing Units Vacant Housing Units Median Household Income

2,385 44.7% 37.7% 17.7% 2,414 35.9% 42.0% 22.2% 2,415 31.6% 42.7% 25.7% 2,427 31.7% 41.0% 27.2%

2018 2023 Median Home Value

$26,572 $30,417

2018 2023 Per Capita Income 2018 2023 Median Age 2010 2018 2023

$67,333 $72,222 $16,349 $18,918 35.0 36.2 36.9

Data Note: Household population includes persons not residing in group quarters. Average Household Size is the household population divided by total households. Persons in families include the householder and persons related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption. Per Capita Income represents the income received by all persons aged 15 years and over divided by the total population. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2018 and 2023 Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 1 of 7

Community Profile Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

2010 Population by Age Total 0-4 5-9 10 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 18 +

Prepared by Esri

5,044 7.7% 7.7%

14 24

7.5% 14.2%

34 44

12.8% 11.2%

- 54 - 64

13.7% 11.5%

- 74 - 84 +

6.9% 4.3%

2018 Population by Age Total 0-4 5-9 10 - 14 15 - 24 25 - 34 35 - 44 45 - 54 55 - 64 65 - 74 75 - 84 85 + 18 + 2023 Population by Age Total 0-4 5-9 10 - 14 15 - 24 25 - 34 35 - 44 45 - 54 55 - 64 65 - 74 75 - 84 85 + 18 + 2010 Population by Sex Males Females 2018 Population by Sex Males Females 2023 Population by Sex Males Females

2.5% 72.8% 4,886 7.3% 7.0% 6.8% 13.7% 13.8% 11.1% 12.0% 12.2% 8.9% 4.6% 2.6% 75.2% 4,839 7.4% 6.8% 6.5% 13.1% 14.0% 11.9% 11.4% 11.6% 9.6% 5.3% 2.5% 75.6% 2,370 2,676 2,287 2,599 2,262 2,578

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2018 and 2023 Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 3 of 7

Community Profile Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

2018 Population 25+ by Educational Attainment Total Less than 9th Grade 9th - 12th Grade, No Diploma High School Graduate GED/Alternative Credential Some College, No Degree Associate Degree Bachelor's Degree Graduate/Professional Degree 2018 Population 15+ by Marital Status Total Never Married Married Widowed Divorced 2018 Civilian Population 16+ in Labor Force Civilian Employed Civilian Unemployed (Unemployment Rate) 2018 Employed Population 16+ by Industry Total Agriculture/Mining Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Transportation/Utilities Information Finance/Insurance/Real Estate Services Public Administration 2018 Employed Population 16+ by Occupation Total White Collar Management/Business/Financial Professional Sales Administrative Support Services Blue Collar Farming/Forestry/Fishing Construction/Extraction Installation/Maintenance/Repair Production Transportation/Material Moving 2010 Population By Urban/ Rural Status Total Population Population Inside Urbanized Area Population Inside Urbanized Cluster Rural Population

Prepared by Esri

3,189 4.5% 13.6% 28.6% 6.3% 27.6% 8.2% 6.7% 4.4% 3,861 41.5% 29.2% 9.9% 19.4% 94.4% 5.6% 1,961 0.1% 2.0% 12.4% 1.5% 11.6% 4.9% 0.9% 6.1% 59.6% 1.1% 1,963 35.9% 2.8% 10.6% 8.7% 13.9% 39.7% 24.5% 0.1% 3.6% 2.5% 8.8% 9.6% 5,046 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2018 and 2023 Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 5 of 7

Community Profile Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

2010 Households by Type Total Households with 1 Person Households with 2+ People Family Households Husband-wife Families With Related Children Other Family (No Spouse Present) Other Family with Male Householder With Related Children Other Family with Female Householder With Related Children Nonfamily Households All Households with Children Multigenerational Households Unmarried Partner Households Male-female Same-sex 2010 Households by Size Total 1 Person Household 2 Person Household 3 Person Household 4 Person Household 5 Person Household 6 Person Household 7 + Person Household 2010 Households by Tenure and Mortgage Status Total Owner Occupied Owned with a Mortgage/Loan Owned Free and Clear Renter Occupied 2010 Housing Units By Urban/ Rural Status Total Housing Units Housing Units Inside Urbanized Area Housing Units Inside Urbanized Cluster Rural Housing Units

Prepared by Esri

1,879 37.6% 62.4% 55.9% 22.2% 9.5% 33.7% 5.9% 3.0% 27.9% 20.2% 6.5% 33.4% 5.2% 8.6% 7.8% 0.8% 1,879 37.6% 25.3% 15.8% 10.2% 5.9% 2.6% 2.7% 1,879 46.1% 32.4% 13.7% 53.9% 2,414 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Data Note: Households with children include any households with people under age 18, related or not. Multigenerational households are families with 3 or more parentchild relationships. Unmarried partner households are usually classified as nonfamily households unless there is another member of the household related to the householder. Multigenerational and unmarried partner households are reported only to the tract level. Esri estimated block group data, which is used to estimate polygons or non-standard geography. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2018 and 2023 Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 6 of 7

Community Profile Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

Top 3 Tapestry Segments 1. 2.

Traditional Living (12B)

Family Foundations (12A)

City Commons (11E)

2018 Consumer Spending Apparel & Services: Total $ Average Spent Spending Potential Index Education: Total $ Average Spent Spending Potential Index Entertainment/Recreation: Total $ Average Spent Spending Potential Index Food at Home: Total $ Average Spent Spending Potential Index Food Away from Home: Total $ Average Spent Spending Potential Index Health Care: Total $ Average Spent Spending Potential Index HH Furnishings & Equipment: Total $ Average Spent Spending Potential Index Personal Care Products & Services: Total $ Average Spent Spending Potential Index Shelter: Total $ Average Spent Spending Potential Index Support Payments/Cash Contributions/Gifts in Kind: Total $ Average Spent Spending Potential Index Travel: Total $ Average Spent Spending Potential Index Vehicle Maintenance & Repairs: Total $ Average Spent Spending Potential Index

$1,872,802 $1,043.93 48 $1,206,100 $672.30 46 $2,721,314 $1,516.90 47 $4,496,653 $2,506.50 50 $3,013,755 $1,679.91 48 $4,894,451 $2,728.23 48 $1,744,051 $972.16 47 $694,895 $387.34 47 $14,614,744 $8,146.46 49 $2,033,286 $1,133.38 46 $1,638,101 $913.10 42 $926,092 $516.22 48

Data Note: Consumer spending shows the amount spent on a variety of goods and services by households that reside in the area. Expenditures are shown by broad budget categories that are not mutually exclusive. Consumer spending does not equal business revenue. Total and Average Amount Spent Per Household represent annual figures. The Spending Potential Index represents the amount spent in the area relative to a national average of 100. Source: Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2015 and 2016 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Esri. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2018 and 2023 Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 7 of 7

Demographic and Income Comparison Profile Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

Census 2010 Summary Population Households Families Average Household Size Owner Occupied Housing Units Renter Occupied Housing Units Median Age

5,046 1,879 1,051 2.49 866 1,013 35.0

2018 Summary Population Households Families Average Household Size Owner Occupied Housing Units Renter Occupied Housing Units Median Age Median Household Income Average Household Income

4,886 1,794 983 2.52 763 1,031 36.2 $26,572 $38,769

2023 Summary Population Households Families Average Household Size Owner Occupied Housing Units Renter Occupied Housing Units Median Age Median Household Income Average Household Income

4,839 1,766 960 2.53 770 996 36.9 $30,417 $45,461

Trends: 2018-2023 Annual Rate Population Households Families Owner Households Median Household Income

-0.19% -0.31% -0.47% 0.18% 2.74%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2018 and 2023.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 1 of 5

Demographic and Income Comparison Profile Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

2018 Households by Income <$15,000 $15,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 $150,000 - $199,999 $200,000+

Number 534 315 234 272 210 94 104 21 9

Median Household Income Average Household Income Per Capita Income

$26,572 $38,769 $16,349

2023 Households by Income <$15,000 $15,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 $150,000 - $199,999 $200,000+

Number 456 296 215 274 231 111 144 29 11

Median Household Income Average Household Income Per Capita Income

$30,417 $45,461 $18,918

Percent 29.8% 17.6% 13.0% 15.2% 11.7% 5.2% 5.8% 1.2% 0.5%

Percent 25.8% 16.8% 12.2% 15.5% 13.1% 6.3% 8.2% 1.6% 0.6%

Data Note: Income is expressed in current dollars. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2018 and 2023.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 2 of 5

Demographic and Income Comparison Profile Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

2010 Population by Age Age 0 - 4 Age 5 - 9 Age 10 - 14 Age 15 - 19 Age 20 - 24 Age 25 - 34 Age 35 - 44 Age 45 - 54 Age 55 - 64 Age 65 - 74 Age 75 - 84 Age 85+

Number 390 388 377 372 346 648 565 690 581 349 217 124

Percent 7.7% 7.7% 7.5% 7.4% 6.9% 12.8% 11.2% 13.7% 11.5% 6.9% 4.3% 2.5%

2018 Population by Age Age 0 - 4 Age 5 - 9 Age 10 - 14 Age 15 - 19 Age 20 - 24 Age 25 - 34 Age 35 - 44 Age 45 - 54 Age 55 - 64 Age 65 - 74 Age 75 - 84 Age 85+

Number 355 342 330 321 350 676 544 584 595 434 227 128

Percent 7.3% 7.0% 6.8% 6.6% 7.2% 13.8% 11.1% 12.0% 12.2% 8.9% 4.6% 2.6%

2023 Population by Age Age 0 - 4 Age 5 - 9 Age 10 - 14 Age 15 - 19 Age 20 - 24 Age 25 - 34 Age 35 - 44 Age 45 - 54 Age 55 - 64 Age 65 - 74 Age 75 - 84 Age 85+

Number 357 330 313 306 326 676 575 553 559 464 257 123

Percent 7.4% 6.8% 6.5% 6.3% 6.7% 14.0% 11.9% 11.4% 11.6% 9.6% 5.3% 2.5%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2018 and 2023.

Page 3 of 5

Demographic and Income Comparison Profile Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

2010 Race and Ethnicity White Alone Black Alone American Indian Alone Asian Alone Pacific Islander Alone Some Other Race Alone Two or More Races Hispanic Origin (Any Race)

Number 1,829 2,904 17 12 1 49 234 118

Percent 36.2% 57.6% 0.3% 0.2% 0.0% 1.0% 4.6% 2.3%

2018 Race and Ethnicity White Alone Black Alone American Indian Alone Asian Alone Pacific Islander Alone Some Other Race Alone Two or More Races Hispanic Origin (Any Race)

Number 1,654 2,877 16 13 1 55 270 142

Percent 33.9% 58.9% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 1.1% 5.5% 2.9%

2023 Race and Ethnicity White Alone Black Alone American Indian Alone Asian Alone Pacific Islander Alone Some Other Race Alone Two or More Races Hispanic Origin (Any Race)

Number 1,557 2,878 16 14 1 61 312 167

Percent 32.2% 59.5% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 1.3% 6.4% 3.5%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2018 and 2023.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 4 of 5

Demographic and Income Comparison Profile Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

Annual Rate (in percent)

Trends 2018-2023 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5

Area State USA

0 Population

Households

Families

Owner HHs

Median HH Income

Population by Age 14 12

Percent

10 8 6 4

2018 2023

2 0

0-4

5-9

10-14

15-19

20-24

2018 Household Income

25-34

35-44

45-54

55-64

65-74

75-84

85+

2018 Population by Race 55

$25K - $34K 13.0% $35K - $49K 15.2%

< $15K 29.8%

45 40

$150K - $199K $200K+ 1.2% 0.5% $100K - $149K 5.8% $75K - $99K 5.2% $50K - $74K 11.7%

Percent

$15K - $24K 17.6%

35 30 25 20 15 10 5 White

Black

Am.Ind.

Asian

Pacific

Other

Two+

Hisp

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2018 and 2023.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 5 of 5

Dominant Tapestry Map Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

Source: Esri

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 1 of 2

Dominant Tapestry Map Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Prepared by Esri

Tapestry Segmentation Tapestry Segmentation represents the latest generation of market segmentation systems that began over 30 years ago. The 68-segment Tapestry Segmentation system classifies U.S. neighborhoods based on their socioeconomic and demographic composition. Each segment is identified by its two-digit Segment Code. Match the two-digit segment labels on the map to the list below. Click each segment below for a detailed description. Segment 1A (Top Tier)

Segment 8C (Bright Young Professionals)

Segment 1B (Professional Pride)

Segment 8D (Downtown Melting Pot)

Segment 1C (Boomburbs)

Segment 8E (Front Porches)

Segment 1D (Savvy Suburbanites)

Segment 8F (Old and Newcomers)

Segment 1E (Exurbanites)

Segment 8G (Hardscrabble Road)

Segment 2A (Urban Chic)

Segment 9A (Silver & Gold)

Segment 2B (Pleasantville)

Segment 9B (Golden Years)

Segment 2C (Pacific Heights)

Segment 9C (The Elders)

Segment 2D (Enterprising Professionals)

Segment 9D (Senior Escapes)

Segment 3A (Laptops and Lattes)

Segment 9E (Retirement Communities)

Segment 3B (Metro Renters)

Segment 9F (Social Security Set)

Segment 3C (Trendsetters)

Segment 10A (Southern Satellites)

Segment 4A (Soccer Moms)

Segment 10B (Rooted Rural)

Segment 4B (Home Improvement)

Segment 10C (Diners & Miners)

Segment 4C (Middleburg)

Segment 10D (Down the Road)

Segment 5A (Comfortable Empty Nesters)

Segment 10E (Rural Bypasses)

Segment 5B (In Style)

Segment 11A (City Strivers)

Segment 5C (Parks and Rec)

Segment 11B (Young and Restless)

Segment 5D (Rustbelt Traditions)

Segment 11C (Metro Fusion)

Segment 5E (Midlife Constants)

Segment 11D (Set to Impress)

Segment 6A (Green Acres)

Segment 11E (City Commons)

Segment 6B (Salt of the Earth)

Segment 12A (Family Foundations)

Segment 6C (The Great Outdoors)

Segment 12B (Traditional Living)

Segment 6D (Prairie Living)

Segment 12C (Small Town Simplicity)

Segment 6E (Rural Resort Dwellers)

Segment 12D (Modest Income Homes)

Segment 6F (Heartland Communities)

Segment 13A (International Marketplace)

Segment 7A (Up and Coming Families)

Segment 13B (Las Casas)

Segment 7B (Urban Villages)

Segment 13C (NeWest Residents)

Segment 7C (American Dreamers)

Segment 13D (Fresh Ambitions)

Segment 7D (Barrios Urbanos)

Segment 13E (High Rise Renters)

Segment 7E (Valley Growers)

Segment 14A (Military Proximity)

Segment 7F (Southwestern Families)

Segment 14B (College Towns)

Segment 8A (City Lights)

Segment 14C (Dorms to Diplomas)

Segment 8B (Emerald City)

Segment 15 (Unclassified)

Source: Esri

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 2 of 2

Household Income Profile Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

Summary Population Households Median Age Average Household Size

Prepared by Esri

2018 4,886 1,794 36.2 2.52

2018-2023 Change -47 -28 0.7 0.01

2023 4,839 1,766 36.9 2.53 2018

Households by Income Household Base Income <$15,000 $15,000-$24,999 $25,000-$34,999 $35,000-$49,999 $50,000-$74,999 $75,000-$99,999 $100,000-$149,999 $150,000-$199,999 $200,000+

Number 1,794 534 315 234 272 210 94 104 21 9

Median Household Income Average Household Income Per Capita Income

$26,572 $38,769 $16,349

2018-2023 Annual Rate -0.19% -0.31% 0.38% 0.08% 2023

Percent 100% 29.8% 17.6% 13.0% 15.2% 11.7% 5.2% 5.8% 1.2% 0.5%

Number 1,766 456 296 215 274 231 111 144 29 11

Percent 100% 25.8% 16.8% 12.2% 15.5% 13.1% 6.3% 8.2% 1.6% 0.6%

$30,417 $45,461 $18,918

Data Note: Income is reported for households as of July 1, 2018 and represents annual income for the preceding year, expressed in 2017 dollars. Income is reported for households as of July 1, 2023 and represents annual income for the preceding year, expressed in 2022 dollars Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri Forecasts for 2018 and 2023.

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 1 of 3

Household Income Profile Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

HH Income Base

<25 100

2018 Households by Income and Age of Householder 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 283 279 302 343

<$15,000 $15,000-$24,999 $25,000-$34,999 $35,000-$49,999 $50,000-$74,999 $75,000-$99,999 $100,000-$149,999 $150,000-$199,999 $200,000+

41 20 13 16 8 1 1 0 0

72 47 37 48 40 16 20 3 0

Median HH Income Average HH Income

$18,399 $25,387

$30,358 $40,563

<25 100%

25-34 100%

41.0% 20.0% 13.0% 16.0% 8.0% 1.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0%

25.4% 16.6% 13.1% 17.0% 14.1% 5.7% 7.1% 1.1% 0.0%

HH Income Base <$15,000 $15,000-$24,999 $25,000-$34,999 $35,000-$49,999 $50,000-$74,999 $75,000-$99,999 $100,000-$149,999 $150,000-$199,999 $200,000+

Prepared by Esri

74 37 36 46 37 17 23 6 3

65-74 274

75+ 214

84 34 37 48 43 21 25 7 3

109 55 40 50 42 21 20 4 2

72 56 50 48 25 8 13 1 0

81 67 22 16 16 9 3 1 0

$32,403 $33,620 $45,830 $46,904 Percent Distribution 35-44 45-54 100% 100%

$26,465 $39,690

$26,231 $34,288

$17,645 $26,045

55-64 100%

65-74 100%

75+ 100%

31.8% 16.0% 11.7% 14.6% 12.2% 6.1% 5.8% 1.2% 0.6%

26.3% 20.4% 18.2% 17.5% 9.1% 2.9% 4.7% 0.4% 0.0%

37.9% 31.3% 10.3% 7.5% 7.5% 4.2% 1.4% 0.5% 0.0%

26.5% 13.3% 12.9% 16.5% 13.3% 6.1% 8.2% 2.2% 1.1%

27.8% 11.3% 12.3% 15.9% 14.2% 7.0% 8.3% 2.3% 1.0%

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 2 of 3

Household Income Profile Polygon Area: 1.02 square miles

HH Income Base

<25 93

2023 Households by Income and Age of Householder 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 281 288 278 315

<$15,000 $15,000-$24,999 $25,000-$34,999 $35,000-$49,999 $50,000-$74,999 $75,000-$99,999 $100,000-$149,999 $150,000-$199,999 $200,000+

37 18 12 16 8 1 1 0 0

63 43 35 49 44 17 26 3 0

Median HH Income Average HH Income

$19,162 $27,167

$34,626 $45,880

<25 100%

25-34 100%

39.8% 19.4% 12.9% 17.2% 8.6% 1.1% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0%

22.4% 15.3% 12.5% 17.4% 15.7% 6.0% 9.3% 1.1% 0.0%

HH Income Base <$15,000 $15,000-$24,999 $25,000-$34,999 $35,000-$49,999 $50,000-$74,999 $75,000-$99,999 $100,000-$149,999 $150,000-$199,999 $200,000+

Prepared by Esri

64 33 34 46 42 21 33 9 5

65-74 288

75+ 224

66 28 27 44 43 24 34 9 3

87 48 32 47 44 23 25 5 2

64 55 50 54 31 11 20 2 0

76 71 23 18 19 12 4 1 0

$38,115 $39,942 $56,289 $56,187 Percent Distribution 35-44 45-54 100% 100%

$31,107 $46,827

$29,050 $40,247

$18,652 $29,875

55-64 100%

65-74 100%

75+ 100%

27.6% 15.2% 10.2% 14.9% 14.0% 7.3% 7.9% 1.6% 0.6%

22.2% 19.1% 17.4% 18.8% 10.8% 3.8% 6.9% 0.7% 0.0%

33.9% 31.7% 10.3% 8.0% 8.5% 5.4% 1.8% 0.4% 0.0%

22.2% 11.5% 11.8% 16.0% 14.6% 7.3% 11.5% 3.1% 1.7%

23.7% 10.1% 9.7% 15.8% 15.5% 8.6% 12.2% 3.2% 1.1%

March 05, 2019 ÂŠ2019 Esri

Page 3 of 3