References
Mansfield E. Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy 1991;20(1):1–12. Mansfield E. Academic research underlying industrial innovations: sources, characteristics and financing. Review of Economics and Statistics 1995;77:55–65. Mansfield E. Academic research and industrial innovation: an update of empirical findings. Research Policy 1998;26:773–6. Mansfield E, Rapoport A, Romeo E, Villani E, Wagner S, Husic F. The Production and Application of New Industrial Technology. New York: W W Norton and Company; 1977. Martin B, Tang P. The benefits from publicly funded research. SPRU WP 161, 2007. McKeown T. The Role of Medicine. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1979. Middleton N, Gunnel D, Whitely E, Dorling D, Frankel S. Secular trends in antidepressant prescribing in the UK, 1975–1998. Journal of Public Health Medicine 2001;23(4):262–7. MINAP Steering Group. Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project (MINAP): How the NHS manages heart attacks. Sixth Public Report 2007. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2007. Moed HF, De Bruin RE, van Leeuwen TN. New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics 1995;33(3):381–422. Moncayo A. Chagas disease: current epidemiological trends in the Southern Cone countries. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 2003;98:577–91. Murphy K, Topel R (eds). Measuring the Gains from Medical Research: An economic approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2003. Mushkin S. Biomedical Research: Costs and benefits. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger; 1979. Nadiri MI. Innovations and technological spillovers. NBER Working Paper 4423 (CC), 1993. Naess AC, Steen PA. Long term survival and costs per life year gained after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2004;60:57–64. National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions. Hypertension: Management in adults in primary care: pharmacological update. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2006. National Health Service. National Service Framework for Mental Health. London: Department of Health; 1999. National Institutes of Health. Cost Savings Resulting from NIH Research Support. 2nd edn. Bethesda, MD: US Dept. of Health and Human Services, NIH; 1993. National Statistics. Key Health Statistics from General Practice 1998. Series MB6 no. 2. London: National Statistics; 2000. National Statistics. Psychiatric Morbidity among Adults Living in Private Households 2000. London: National Statistics; 2001. National Statistics. Patient Care in the Community. NHS community mental health nursing, 2003–04. London: National Statistics; 2004. Natural Environment Research Council. Economic Benefits of Environmental Science. Swindon: NERC; 2006. www.nerc.ac.uk/publications/corporate/ economic-fullreport.asp [accessed 15 September 2008]. Nelson R. Institutions supporting technical advance in industry. American Economic Review 1986;76:186–9. NERA Economic Consulting. Key Factors in Attracting Internationally Mobile Investments by the Research-based Pharmaceutical Industry. A report prepared for the UK Trade and Investment and the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry. London: NERA; 2007. www.nera.com/image/PUB_ MobileInvestments_Sep2007.pdf [accessed 15 September 2008]. NICE. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. London: NICE; 2004. Nordhaus WD. The health of nations: the contribution of improved health to living standards. In Murphy and Topel (2003). Norris RM. Fatality outside hospital from acute coronary events in three British health districts, 1994–5. United Kingdom Heart Attack Study Collaborative Group. BMJ 1998;316:1065–70. O’Brien CL, Gage BF. Costs and effectiveness of Ximelagatran for stroke prophylaxis in chronic atrial fibrillation. JAMA 2005;293:699–706.
102
OECD. Purchasing Power Parities (PPP). OECD Statistics Directorate; 2008. www.oecd.org/department/0,3355,en_2649_34357_1_1_1_1_1,00.html [accessed 15 September 2008]. Office for National Statistics. Annual Abstract of Statistics 2007 Edition. No. 143. London: Office for National Statistics; 2007. Office for National Statistics. General Household Survey. London: Office for National Statistics; 2008. www.statistics.gov.uk/ssd/surveys/general_ household_survey.asp [accessed 15 September 2008]. Owen-Smith J, Powell W. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: the effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science 2004;15(1):5–21. Palmer S, Sculpher M, Philips Z, Robinson M, Ginnelly L, Bakhai A, Abrams K, Cooper N, Packham C, Alfakih K, Hall A, Gray D. Management of nonST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: how cost-effective are glycoprotein IIb/IIIA antagonists in the UK National Health Service? Int J Cardiol 2005;100:229–40. Park J. International and intersectoral R&D spillovers in the OECD and East Asian economies. Economic Inquiry 2004;42(4):739–57. Peterson W. Return to poultry research in the United States. Journal of Farm Economics 1967;49:656–69. Peto R, Lopez AD, Boreham J, Thun M. Mortality from Smoking in Developed Countries 1950–2000. Second edition. 2006. www.deathsfromsmoking.net [accessed 15 September 2008]. Pharmaceutical Industry Competitiveness Task Force (PICTF). Value of the Pharmaceutical Industry to the UK Economy. London: Office of Health Economics; 2001. www.advisorybodies.doh.gov.uk/pictf/value.pdf [accessed 15 September 2008]. Phillips KA, Shlipak MG, Coxson P, Heidenreich PA, Hunink MGM, Goldman PA, Williams LW, Weinstein MC, Goldman L. Health and economic benefits of increased -blocker use following myocardial infarction. JAMA 2000;284:2748–54. Pisano G. Can science be a business? Lessons from biotech. Harvard Business Review 2006;84(10):114–25. Powell WM. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organisation. Research in Organisations 1990;12:293–336. Raiten D, Berman S. Can the Impact of Basic Biomedical Research be Measured? A case study approach. Bethesda, MD: Life Sciences Research Office, FASEB; 1993. Romer P. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 1986;94(5):1002–37. Rosenbeck R, Leslie D, Sindelar J, Miller EA, Stroup S, McEvoy J, Davis S, Davis CE, Keefe RSE, Swartz M, Perkins D, Hsiao JK, Lieberman J. Costeffectiveness of second-generation anti-psychotics and perphenazine in a randomized trial of treatment for chronic schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry 2006;163:2080–9. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. The Societal Impact of Applied Research: Towards a quality assessment system. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences; 2002. Salter A, D’Este P, Martin B, Geuna A, Scott A, Pavitt K, Patel P, Nightingale P. Talent, not Technology: Publicly funded research and innovation in the UK. Brighton: SPRU; 2000. www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/documents/ saltertalentshort.pdf [accessed 15 September 2008]. Salter A, Martin B. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy 2001;30:509–32. Samsa GP, Matchar DB, Williams GR, Levy DE. Cost-effectiveness of ancrod treatment of acute ischaemic stroke: results from the Stroke Treatment with Ancrod Trial (STAT). J Eval Clin Prac 2002;8:61–70. Sandercock P, Berge E, Dennis M, Forbes J, Hand P, Kwan J, Lewis S, Lindley R, Neilson A, Thomas B, Warlaw J. A systematic review of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and barriers to implementation of thrombolytic and neuroprotective therapy for acute ischaemic stroke in the NHS. Health Technol Assess 2002;6(26). Scherer FM. Interindustry technology flows and productivity growth. Review of Economics and Statistics 1982;64:627–34. Scherer FM. Using linked patent and R&D data to measure interindustry technology flows. In Z Griliches (ed.). R&D, Patents and Productivity. Chicago: NBER and University of Chicago Press; 1984.
Medical Research: What’s it worth? Estimating the economic benefits from medical research in the UK