ISSUE - 15 2011
8
-
9
12
15
13
16
22
13
18
20
9
11
12
13
14
15
15
17
18
18
20
Rank in 2009
22
29
13
8
19
10
14
15
11
-
9
12
6
4
16
6
5
3
1
1
3 year average rank
21
22
15
16
17
13
14
13
11
-
9
11
7
6
10
5
5
3
1
1
Duke University: Fuqua
HEC Paris
Dartmouth College: Tuck
Ceibs
Yale School of Management
New York University: Stern
IMD
Indian School of Business
University of Chicago: Booth
Country U.S.A.
France
U.S.A.
China
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
Switzerland
India
U.S.A
India
U.S.A.
Spain
Spain
U.S.A.
China
GSB U.S.A
France / Singapore
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
U.K
Audit year [1] 2008
2008
2008
2011
2008
2008
2009
2011
2007
2011
2009
2009
2009
2009
2011
2010
2009
2008
2008
2010
Salary today (US$) 136,248
123,287
155,732
118,514
151,451
138,398
145,539
132,352
152,370
174,440
158,353
133,338
142,894
167,366
133,334
182,746
147,974
170,817
175,153
146,332
Weighted salary (US$) 136,563
122,828
155,020
126,315
146,959
138,865
145,846
134,406
151,373
174,440
158,387
131,890
149,584
163,407
133,334
183,260
147,883
170,238
171,551
145,776
Salary percentage increase 107
106
113
155
133
119
89
187
109
152
121
138
136
117
142
115
108
116
123
132
Value for money rank 93
36
90
46
79
91
6
39
95
26
88
65
28
97
16
98
4
87
89
57
Career progress rank 68
14
56
43
41
34
5
28
55
1
10
3
4
17
36
9
18
22
33
11
Aims achieved rank 22
4
3
48
6
9
66
15
69
30
0
2
1 40
35
1
14
16
25
49
23
52
20
44
32
11
41
66
26
94
54
8
82
28
31
17
14
51
32
2
Placement success rank
Footnotes: 1. KPMG reported on the results of obtaining evidence and applying specified audit procedures relating to selected survey data provided for the Financial Times 2011 MBA ranking for selected business schools. Enquiries about the assurance process can be made by contacting Michelle Podhy of KPMG at mpodhy@kpmg. ca. The specified audit procedures were carried out between October and November 2010. The audit date published denotes the survey for which the specified audit precedures were conducted.
Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad (IIMA)
MIT Sloan School of Management
Iese Business School
IE Business School
Columbia Business School
Hong Kong UST Business School
Stanford University
Insead
Harvard Business School
University of Pennsylvania: Wharton
London Business School
School name
Table notes: Although the headline ranking figures show the changes in the survey year to year, the pattern of clustering among the schools is also significant. A total of 210 points separate the top school from the school at number 100 in the ranking. The top 10
6
11
8
6
7
9
4
5
4
9
3
3
4
2
1
6
1
Current rank
P h a rm a F o c u s A s i A
Rank in 2010
12
1 19 22 14 19 25 18 33 18 22
2 1 7 3 50 6 29 17 8
82[10] [10]
90[16] [8]
15 10 16 19 13 21 27 18
28 15 11 20 40 13 27 16
98[9] [6]
30
26
35
37
37
36
23
Women board (%) 4. (89) 12. (87) 20. (80)
10
7
17
17
24
10
16
5
13
30
13
28
23
10
39
17
17
48
8
16
39
65
31
65
31
49
98
21
37
0
32
49
54
62
88
38
90
37
37
39
83
40
42
33
35
100
5
44
8
51
80
87
46
93
41
92
34
34
92
International students (%)
5. (95) 13. (92) 21. (82)
International faculty (%) 85
International board (%) 74
5
55
50
72
59
1
35
65
42
51
3
31
49
19
56
8
52
43
2
International mobility rank 6. (100) 14. (93) 22. (62)
41
41
12
50
17
16
81
55
38
0
60
90
82
35
94
25
80
21
66
60
International experience rank 7. (91) 15. (98) 23. (71)
28
13
38
22
35
31
46
77
50
81
25
4
34
57
9
15
5
59
33
11
Languages 0
99
99
100
96
97
100
100
100
96
96
100
00
93
97
100
92
97
92
100
98
Faculty with doctorates (%) 8. (90) 16. (86) 24. (79)
1[26]
0
1
0
0
1
0
0[26]
0
0
1
1
0
1[26]
0
2
0
0
[26]
1[26]
FT doctoral rank
3
33
22
76
33
13
67
81
4
92
19
70
62
10
14
8
10
1
2
7
9. (99) 17. (94) 25. (39)
20
47
n/a
n/a
35
5
n/a
n/a
8
55
11
48
69
7
19
4
17
14
2
23
FT research rank
26. School runs additional courses for MBA students for which additional language skills are required. These figures are included in the calculations for the ranking but are not represented on the table to avoid confusion.
2. (84) 10. (97) 18. (88)
77[6]
89[2]
93[9]
92[5]
90[10]
86[10]
83
28
35
7
35
24
29
35
34
39
33
36
40
28
Women students (%)
3. (96) 11. (85) 19. (73)
12 15
10 89[6]
97[6]
9
89[3]
94[10]
91
69[8]
92
90[6]
84
24
Employed at three months (%) 4
Alumni recommend rank
[3]
Women faculty (%)
91[10]
Strategy