3 minute read

administration on the economy?

WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF THE LULA AND BOLSONARO ADMINISTRATION ON THE ECONOMY? – 75

Well, I am always in favor of freedom, I would never be in favor of dictatorship, and there is no such thing as a good government for everyone or a bad government for everyone. hhh So I'll start by talking about Lula, at the time of his government, many farmers complained about food prices, they claimed that they didn't make a profit, however, the population in general praised his government, they said that everything was cheap, the minimum wage went up every year of inflation, savings deposits were breaking records and in his government Brazil was really much better, only in his replacement, who was Dilma, that Brazil started to get worse, many say that the culprit for this was Lula, who has already made progress in the things that would make Brazil worse. Temer, who replaced Dilma after the impeachment (which the left claims was a coup), managed to improve the economy a little, and then Bolsonaro took over. In the Bolsonaro government, he supported the farmers a lot, and it is logical, if you have a company and you have the opportunity to make more profit, you will do it, at least that's what the majority of the population thinks, but

Advertisement

WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF THE LULA AND BOLSONARO ADMINISTRATION ON THE ECONOMY? – 76

I think differently, the books I wrote is available for sale at the minimum value allowed and there was no increase in their price compared to three years ago, I read the bible and I don't have "gold" as a priority in life, neither inside or outside the bible, in short, the true sentence that the president should use is "Rich Above All And God Above All". When Bolsonaro took office, many expected the dollar to fall, however, that was not what happened, it stabilized in the first year, and in the second the pandemic came, the president lowered the bank's interest rates and the international market is also in a state of flux. bad and that made the dollar skyrocket, thus benefiting the farmers, since the president is in favor of “market freedom”, which in this case is when the president does not interfere in the prices of products, so the Brazilian product was cheaper abroad, encouraging countries to buy Brazilian products, so the product is more in short supply and the price has gone up, but this was not the only thing that contributed to the rise in food prices, it is also due to the

. WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF THE LULA AND BOLSONARO ADMINISTRATION ON THE ECONOMY? – 77

fact that many products in Brazil are imported, so with the higher dollar, they get more expensive. Bolsonaro's government claims that it will not interfere with freedom, this is its banner in all matters, and it accuses Lula of controlling prices. Generally, this attitude of the current president helped many companies that were closing in the red and today have unbelievable profits, with these profits these companies invest more and end up generating jobs, however, the salary of employees and the minimum wage did not keep up with inflation, causing the rich to get richer and the poor to get poorer. Even with the positive GDP, something good for the economy, the average Brazilian net salary fell to R$ 1,149 in 2021, which represents 8.3% lower than the previous year. This salary dropped because many Brazilians were unemployed and when it was time to get a job, they ended up accepting any service to avoid going hungry, but I cannot fail to mention here another detail, every year at least INSS retirees and pensioners receive

WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF THE LULA AND BOLSONARO ADMINISTRATION ON THE ECONOMY? – 78

a raise according to inflation, however, inflation is an average of the increases in a list of certain products and services and, in this case, products that the poor buy and that also the rich buy, and the inflation of the poor will always be higher than that of the rich. Those who earn less than BRL 1,808.79 had an infraction of 10.08% in 2019 and those who earn more than BRL 17,764.49 had an inflation of 9.54%, which proves what I said. hhh

This article is from: