IŠVADOS
4. Nereikia skubėti braukti iš sąrašų arba vengti į juos įrašyti paveldosaugos objektų, nes gyvenimas keičiasi ir tai, kas šiandien neįmanoma, rytoj gali būti visiškai įmanoma.
2. Gelbstint paveldą, reikėtų lanksčiau traktuoti reglamentuojančius įstatymus, labiau laikytis įstatymo dvasios, o ne raidės. Joks paminklotvarkos tarpsnis neturi būti monopolizuotas, kad saugojimas nebūtų silpninamas.
5. Reikėtų nesižavėti globaliniais objektais, nes tai veda į niveliaciją ir savitumo praradimą. Galima tik palinkėti kuo geriau išnaudoti galimybes ir neprarasti vertybių…
I S SU E
3. Tik įvairūs paminklosaugos būdai gali duoti teigiamų rezultatų
145 T H E
1. Saugant paveldą, svarbiausias yra žmogiškasis faktorius – žmonių išprusimas ir noras jį išsaugoti. Be šito paveldo išsaugojimas tampa problemiškas.
Eligijus Juvencijus Morkūnas
OF
THE JUNGLES OF PRESERVING HERITAGE VALUES
Gauta: 2005 01 22 Parengta spaudai: 2005 10 20
HERITAGE
If heritage preservation becomes the legacy of only heritage experts and officials, it will fail to be effective. In order to preserve the monuments and use effectively the opportunities, it is necessary to focus on educating people since their youth so that cultural heritage (material, oral or other) becomes part of one’s identity and every citizen grows aware of being responsible of protecting heritage.
CULTUR AL
In addition, the article stresses the human factor. It is important that people who work within the area of cultural heritage deal with the issue coming to the point instead of following the law in a blind way.
OF
The article emphasizes that the technical heritage in Lithuania received fairly late attention only in about 1972 – 1975. It is sometimes a case that the value of a technical monument is estimated on the basis of subjective criteria, without taking into account all the possible criteria as well as a technical object itself. The article gives the multiple examples of how technical objects were destroyed or used inappropriately for the present purposes. It also discusses two major methods of preservation – that is, ‘in situ’ and the preservation in skansen-type museums. The author does not promote any one of the given methods in order to avoid mistakes. Both the methods are applicable and appropriate. Any monument to be inscribed needs to be assessed on the basis of as many criteria as possible. However, only the time factor can show if the decision was right. It has not so far worked in favor of the ‘in situ’ method.
PROTECTION
Su m m ar y