CORREN AGAINST the Machine

Text:AI-bot(https://smodin.io/writing),KendallAllenandAlbinBergström Pictures:KendallAllen&AI-bot

Wewerequiteskepticalwhen’future’wasdecideduponforthethemeofthisissue.Asthenation’slibrarianand chronicler,wespendalotoftimethinkingaboutthepast,whetheritbesiftingthrougholdbooksorrecounting thenation’shistory.Wearewritingtoyou,ourdearreaders,toremindyouofthebenefitsofanalogthinking. First,you’llhearfromus,butofcourse,wewillallowAItechnologytoanswerforitselfaswell.Happythinking!

PROMT:“WHYAIISBETTERTHANANALOGWRITING”

Ai is more accurate and efficient than analog writing. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has made incredible strides in its ability to generate human-like text As a result, AI writing is becoming more common, with companies and organizations using it tocreateeverythingfrommarketingcopytofinancialreports

Analogwritingisadatedformofcommunication.Writesonicisan easy-to-use AI content assist tool that helps you simplify the content creation process Combining the power of artificial intelligence and human creativity they allow Writesonic to automaticallydriveyourcontentcreationprocess TheAI-powered writing tool is based on the GPT-3 model and can help generate various forms of content such as blog posts, articles, landing pages,Facebookpromotionaltext,andmore.

Why AI doesn’t only suck but is also lame.

In order to write an argumentative text against AI one (or in our case, two) can’t even try to outshine the machine. Indeed it outsmarts the human brain on so many levels, still, this isn’t any burden for a human opponent against AI. Instead, this discussion of a bright computer, competitive to the minds of mankind, is itself an argument in opposition to the progressive evolution of computer science; where is the space left for human creativity and flourishing? This technological development has generated a product that thinks for us, but also creates fully artistic works and compositions – sometimes hilariously uncanny, sometimes frighteningly accurate –in a manner that leaves us passive towards our independent actions.

When we write a question with several dimensions and receive a valid answer in just a few seconds, we are fed information we haven’t mentally strained for. We are left with the false stimulus of knowledge. Falsely believing we’ve become any smarter when we haven’t. A good society, the collective group, must be harmonious with the acceptance of individuals with freedom to express themselves. Freedom of this kind doesn’t simply mean that they’re allowed to express themselves but also that the society both can secure that space as well as its ambition is to work against the obstacles of creativity and expression. But, with the presence of an AI capable of being the voice of human beings, is freedom of expression really granted?