18 — Vanguard, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 26, 2012 THE Ibrahim Prize for Achievement in African Leadership — the world’s biggest individual prize — was not awarded for a third time in four years as no suitable candidates were found, it was announced Monday. At a press conference in London, the Mo Ibrahim Foundation said it was not going to compromise on its standard of excellence in a leader. The award, set up by Sudan-born telecoms tycoon Mo Ibrahim in 2006, carries a $5 million prize paid over 10 years and $200,000 annually for life from then on, with a further $200,000 per year available for 10 years for good causes backed by the winner. The award goes to a democratically-elected African leader who has served their mandated term and left office in the last three years. “You make your bed, you have to lie on it. If we said we’re going to have a prize for exceptional leadership, we have to stick to that. We are not going to compromise,” Ibrahim said. “We are not just in the business of positive messages — we would lose our credibility.” The Mo Ibrahim Foundation has awarded the annual prize only three times since it was established, plus two special awards given to South Africa’s Nelson Mandela and South African former Archbishop Desmond Tutu. The prize committee said they reviewed a number of eligible candidates “but none met the criteria needed to win this award”. “The award is about excellence in leadership. In
Dearth Of Leadership In Africa the first six years the prize committee has selected three very worthy laureates who continue to be an inspiration and whose examples, we hope, will be emulated.” The inaugural prize went to former president Joaquim Chissano of Mozambique in 2007 and Botswana’s ex-president Festus Mogae won in 2008. The prize was not awarded in the following two years. Former Cape Verde president Pedro Pires won the 2011 prize. The London-based foundation also publishes the Ibrahim Index, ranking 52 African countries according to 88 indicators grouped under safety and the rule of law, participation and human rights, sustainable economic opportunity and human development. There has been no change in its top five this year — with Mauritius topping the index with a score of 83 out of 100, ahead of Cape Verde (78), Botswana (77), Seychelles (73) and South Africa (71).
Somalia remained at the bottom with a score of seven, behind Democratic Republic of Congo (33), Chad (33), Eritrea (33) and the Central African Republic (34). Ibrahim said that while there had been major improvements in some sectors, the continent’s main players were lagging behind. “Between 2000 and 2011 there is a marked improvement in governance across Africa,” he said. “The major improvements were in health, the rural sector, the economy. The interesting development was in gender. Gender has improved amazingly over the last 10-11 years. The highest improvement in any category in the index.” However across the data, “the four main powerhouses in Africa — Egypt, Nigeria, South Africa and Kenya — appear to be really stuttering. They are not showing really convincing progress. “East Africa is not doing that well. It has been over taken by west Africa in the category of sustainable economic development. “In general, we see positive development in Africa. The economy is moving forward relentlessly. Education and health is improving, there is great development there. Gender issues are improving. “We see, unfortunately, a little bit of decline in the issues of human rights and participation. Economic development does not give us a reason to be complacent about that.
OPINION BY BABA-DANLAMI MAIDABARA
INCE the establishment of the National Hajj Commission of Nigeria, NAHCON, about six years ago, the body has been striving hard not only to prove to the Nigerian Muslims and the government that it has the capacity to make things work, but also ensure that the unnecessary and avoidable hardship experienced by pilgrims become a thing of the past. And one of the ways the Commission, under the leadership of Mallam Musa Bello, does this is through the introduction of new ways of doing things, during every hajj operation, thus making a subsequent hajj operation better than the preceding one. For instance, during the 2011 hajj operation, several committees were put in place to beef up the services rendered to pilgrims. The committees include, but not limited to: National Reception –which welcome all Nigerian pilgrims, irrespective of states as they arrived the holy land; Command and Control Centrewhich monitored aircraft movement; Consumer Rights-which policed what was given to pilgrims in terms of food and drink on board and in the holy land; and the National Feeding Committee- which ensured that pilgrims get food at Mina and Arafat, timely. Ironically, the feeding committee was only effective in the areas of feeding to NAHCON officials and the Federal Government delegation, a thing that was pointed out at the post-Arafat meeting by the Consumer Rights
S
Haji 2012: Despite hitches, still some cheering news Committee. The Feeding Committee’s shortcoming notwithstanding, it did not substantially take the shine off the successes recorded. The gains recorded may, perhaps, be the reason the Sultan of Sokoto, Alhaji Sa’ad Abubakar 111, who is the Amir-ul-Hajj and leader of the Federal Government’s delegation, described the 2011 hajj operation as being “far better ” than the 2010 operation, while expressing the hope that the 2012 operation would also beat the 2011 operation in terms of gains recorded. And the Commission was set to achieve it in spite of the hullabaloo that greeted the untimely return (not deportation) of female pilgrims from the holy land over the contentious issue of Mahram (guardian for the female pilgrim) to Nigeria, less than a week after their initial departure. Since this piece is not about the appropriateness and inappropriateness of what transpired, I shall leave the issue of Mahram for now, and return to it at a later date. But the point is, were the female pilgrims to be deported, as erroneously captured by some ill-formed officials of the Commission, and which was picked up by my constituency, the media, those pilgrims would not be allowed entry into anywhere near the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, until after five years. But this is not the case here. What then is the cheering news about the
2012 hajj operation? It is about Tent C. What the hell is Tent C? Now, while it is true that as pilgrims, we spend between 14 to 40 days, depending on the arrangement, in holy land, the most significant aspect of the entire hajj exercise takes place within five days. And these days are spent in Mina and Arafat.
I
ncidentally, these are places where most Nigerian pilgrims suffer the most. They sleep on bare floor, they catch cold, eat all kinds of filth in the name of food, and sleep amidst all kinds of heaps of refuse generated by food vendors, most of whom are illegal migrants. It was this kind of filthy environment that led to the outbreak of cholera at the Kaduna camp last year, while in Mina. However, the Tent C, which is an additional service arrangement for the five days in Mina and Arafat, will eliminate all that this year. This arrangement was conceptualised and brokered by the NAHCON commissioner in charge of Policy, Personnel, Management and Finance, PPMF, Yusuf Ibrahim Adebayo. With just additional 600SAR, equivalent of just N24, 000, which has now been factored into the total package each pilgrim paid, every Nigerian pilgrim will be entitled to a mattress, a blanket, a pillow and three square meal, for these five days, with adequate security. This arrangement totally eliminates the presence of any food
vendor, a thing that will add to the hygienic nature of the surroundings around the tent. But there is a caveat. Once any pilgrim gives out his/her tag, which allows him/ her entry into such a tent, he/she will neither be allowed entry into the tent, nor enjoy the rights and privileges that come with it. As such, pilgrims are advised to ask for their rights from their respective state officials. State officials too, who are in the habit of short-changing pilgrims, especially those pilgrims who can neither read nor write, must fear Allah and discharge their duties with utmost responsibility. They must desist from denying these village men and women their rights and privileges, and bear in mind that any act of assisting any pilgrim before and during hajj, is in itself an act of ibadah (worship.) For those who are reading this piece, do a Jihad by interpreting this piece into your local language for the benefit of those old men and women who are usually subjected to unnecessary and avoidable hardship while in holy land. Adebayo has played his part. It is left for all us to ensure that pilgrims who pay for these services enjoy them. May Allah take us to the holy land safely and bring us back in peace and in one piece. Amin. •Mr. Maidabara, a journalist, wrote from Abuja.