AAU Performance Update by Travis Thompson

A Performance Update:

Advancing USFâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Strategic Plan

Prepared by Office of Decision Support, Planning & Analysis December 2010

Table of Contents

Presidentâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Message.............................................................................................................................. 1 Provostâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Overview of Progress............................................................................................................. 2 A Performance Update Overview.........................................................................................................11 University Leadership...........................................................................................................................11 University of South Florida (USF)..........................................................................................................12 USF Strategic Plan................................................................................................................................12 Association of American Universities (AAU).........................................................................................13 AAU Eligibility Criteria...........................................................................................................................13 Strategic Performance Metrics.............................................................................................................15 Performance Dashboard.......................................................................................................................16 Performance Data:

Infrastructure.................................................................................................................................17

Students........................................................................................................................................29

Faculty...........................................................................................................................................49

Research........................................................................................................................................58

President’s Message

I am pleased to share with you an interim performance update (2007-2010) for Transforming Higher Education for Global Innovation, USF’s Strategic Plan for 2007-2012. Since the plan was approved by the USF System Board of Trustees on May 31, 2007, we have witnessed some major changes at USF, the most significant of which has been a rapid loss of base state funding and the emergence of our multi-campus system. This is the second phase of strategic planning and advancement during my presidency, with the first guiding us to become a Top 50 Public Research University during the period 2001-2006. Our ambitious vision continues and I am sure that you’ll be struck by the remarkable gains that we have demonstrated in spite of the most challenging economic climate in the history of USF. Initially conceived of as a plan for the USF System, the thoughtful development and approval of distinctive missions and visions at USF St. Petersburg, USF SarasotaPresident Manatee, and USF Polytechnic has meant that our vision to become “a premier research university with state, national, and global impact, and positioned for membership in the Association of American Universities,” has become the focus of USF, embraced by the doctoral granting, research intensive campus in Tampa, that includes USF Health and the College of Marine Science. Judy Genshaft

As you know, USF has emerged as a national leader in strategic planning and performance accountability. Our earlier interactive electronic platform has been replicated by institutions around the world to track institutional performance. This report, that is also available online, provides a fresh, exciting, and new look which aligns institutional planning and performance assessment in a focused and disciplined manner. I invite you to reflect on our university’s remarkable growth as a top tier national research university as you navigate the following pages and I thank you for your continuing support of the University of South Florida.

Provost’s Overview of Progress

The University of South Florida’s rapid emergence on the national stage as a top tier public research university, over the past decade, is perhaps unprecedented. Just 50 years after the first student enrolled at the university, USF is proud to take its place alongside many of the nation’s most esteemed public research universities, but we are not yet satisfied. At the outset, I want to acknowledge the hard work and valued contributions of a remarkably talented group of data and policy analysts in the Office of Decision Support, who are responsible for this report and whose important work continues to inform budget and strategic decision making at USF. Guided by the prior strategic plan (2001-2006), institutional gains over the past decade have been nothing short of dramatic. Student headcount across the USF System has grown by one third, from 35,728 during the 2000-2001 academic year to 47,576 in Fall 2010 (with a growth of 30 percent at USF, from 31,042 to 40,433), while the average Ralph wilcox freshman SAT score has increased by more than 100 points (from 1,059 in Fall 1999 to Provost & Executive Vice President 1,194 last Fall) while the mean high school grade point average climbed from 3.36 to 3.83. During the same period, USF witnessed a 19 percent decline in state appropriated funds (i.e. general revenue and lottery) per full-time equivalent student (from $8,591 to $6,973), while undergraduate tuition for a full-time Florida resident student has doubled (from $2,256 to $4,577). It is important to note that available revenue per FTE, derived from state appropriations plus student tuition, barely increased over the decade, challenging the university to diversify its revenue base. Although USF’s endowment climbed above $400 million in early 2007, before the worldwide collapse of the financial markets, gains from $203 million in 1999-2000 to $360 million in 2008-2009 amounted to a 56 percent growth. Through careful alignment of strategic and budget planning, USF has been able to avoid academic program closures, furloughs and the layoff of tenured and tenure-earning faculty, while maintaining considerable progress toward its strategic destination. Throughout these most challenging of times, USF has emerged as one of the nation’s most rapidly growing research universities, with total research expenditures doubling to $278 million (for fiscal year 2008) in the past decade and federal expenditures jumping from $51 million to $170 million. During the same period, the number of degrees awarded climbed 80 percent, from 5,996 in academic year 2000-2001 to 10,805 in 2009-2010. The past decade also saw library holdings increase from 1.7 million to 2.5 million volumes (or 47 percent), characterized by a dramatic shift to electronic sources, while instructional space across the USF System grew 18 percent, from 573,321 to 678,546 square feet. As the USF Board of Trustees approved the 2007-2012 Strategic Plan, Transforming Higher Education for Global Innovation, in May 2007, they acknowledged the bold vision yet could not have anticipated the impact of the worldwide economic recession on the life of the university. Since July 1, 2007, the USF System has seen a loss of $103 million in state appropriations from its base budget (with $83 million, or 30 percent, alone being cut from the USF budget). While the budget gap has, in part, been filled with $23.0 million in non-recurring federal economic stimulus funds (for FY 2009-2010 and 2010-2011) and increasing tuition revenues, the university has had to count on the implementation of efficiencies (including but not limited to reductions in administrative costs, restrictions on enrollment growth, reduced course offerings and increased class sizes, consolidated purchasing, shared services, and energy efficiencies), and the judicious spending down of non-recurring reserves to offset budget deficits. “Staying the course” through strategic focus and discipline has become a hallmark of collective decision-making across the university, over the past three years, for though it is recognized that the destination might now be more distant than once envisioned, there remains a strong commitment to the path that is being navigated.

This strategic planning and performance update centers only on USF, the doctoral granting, research intensive campus of the USF System. With USF St. Petersburg, USF Sarasota-Manatee, and USF Polytechnic each developing a differentiated mission and distinctive vision for the future, as separately accredited institutions, their individual reporting to the U.S. Department of Education through the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), will ultimately result in their differential classification by the Carnegie Foundation, and separate rankings by U.S. News & World Report. It is anticipated that each member campus of the USF System will, in due course, present regular reports on their strategic progress.

Transforming Higher Education for Global Innovation Having achieved its strategic goal of climbing into the nation’s top 50 public research universities, as measured by the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) ranking of institutions’ total and federal research and development expenditures, USF embarked upon an even more ambitious path for its 2007-2012 phase of strategic planning. Striving to become “a premier research university with state, national, and global impact, and positioned for membership in the Association of American Universities,” the university has focused its future on performance benchmarking of the then 34 (and now 35 with the addition of Georgia Institute of Technology), public AAU member institutions. Classified by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching as a Research University with Very High Activity (RU/VH: a classification reserved for just 63 public research universities nationwide), USF has also tracked its performance against Florida’s other three top-tier research universities – the University of Florida, the University of Miami, and Florida State University. Annual performance data are also collected for the University of Central Florida, Florida International University, and Florida Atlantic University. Moreover, USF’s national peers (carefully selected based upon similarity of institutional characteristics), include four AAU members – Rutgers University, Stony Brook University, the University at Buffalo, and the University of California, Irvine – along with four non-AAU institutions – North Carolina State University, the University of Alabama at Birmingham, the University of Cincinnati, and the University of Illinois, Chicago. Finally, we track the performance of the following prospective AAU member institutions – Arizona State University, Colorado State University, the University of Utah, Virginia Tech and the University of Georgia. Collectively, these performance analyses and comparisons inform USF’s annual planning activities. Strengthening USF’s position in the Carnegie Foundation’s top tier (RU/VH) of research universities remains our top priority as we track progress toward meeting AAU’s primary and secondary performance indices. Concurrently, we carefully gauge institutional progress in the NSF’s ranking of research universities, the National Research Council’s ratings of graduate programs, the Top American Research Universities (TARU) annual report, along with higher education institutional rankings provided by U.S. News and World Report and other commercial and academic/ professional sources. Guided by its mission, vision, values, and goals, USF’s upward trajectory as a national public research university is carefully tracked through a set of prioritized strategic metrics. For the first time, this report includes both inputs and outputs for the latest reported year (as well as a decade of trend data), and is framed around USF’s infrastructure, students, faculty, and research. As we seek to benchmark USF’s resource base and performance against prior years, and a wide range of referential universities (public AAUs, Florida’s research universities, national peers, and AAU prospects), we utilize national data sources, thus, the most recent reporting period often lags one or two years behind the current year. Definitions and data sources are also included.

Strengthening USF’s Infrastructure The data on pages 17-28 paint the picture of a university that is significantly undercapitalized compared to the nation’s top public research universities. Falling short of all 35 AAU public universities in total expenditures per student FTE explains, in large part, the extremely poor student-to-faculty ratio which, incidentally, characterizes most public universities in the state of Florida. This, in turn, presents widespread challenges for improving student success and continuing growth in research productivity at USF. It is notable that the level of investment also falls short of eight of the nine AAU prospects seemingly placing USF at a comparative disadvantage in pursuing its vision. While the relative share of state appropriations to USF (and other Florida universities) remains quite high, we recognize that such levels of public investment are rapidly shrinking resulting in an increased burden on other fund sources to ensure continued access, quality, and productivity. The resulting budget shortfall will, in part, be offset with enhanced tuition revenues (from both increases to undergraduate resident tuition and the enrollment of more full-fee paying out-of-state students), increases in available endowments and other private gifts, and growth in research expenditures and other revenues streams, including but not limited to auxiliaries and licensing revenues. The total revenues per student FTE underscores the weak position that USF finds itself in compared to AAU members and prospects, as well as national peer institutions. Significant improvements in annual giving and successful completion of the current comprehensive campaign will be essential to undergirding USF’s fragile infrastructure. Future Considerations: • Recognizing the fragility of USF’s infrastructure, the university must reduce its dependency on diminishing state resources in seeking to diversify its sources of revenue. • USF’s Board of Trustees must carefully consider annual increases to undergraduate resident tuition (consistent with Florida Statute), to help offset losses in general revenue while maintaining academic access and quality. Primary investments must contribute to reducing student-to-faculty and student-to-advisor ratios with a mind to enhancing student learning and success. It will be imperative that USF grow sources of need-based financial aid (including university funded and foundation scholarships) to offset tuition increases for those who qualify for need – with a mind to maintaining access and improving the academic success (i.e. retention, persistence, and graduation rates) of limited income students. • As USF seeks to reshape its enrollment profile to grow both graduate student headcount and FTE to 25 percent of the university’s enrollment, consideration must be given to moderating graduate student tuition increases. • The Board of Trustees must be careful to control out-of-state tuition increases (at both undergraduate and graduate level), to ensure that USF remains nationally and internationally competitive in attracting intellectual talent from outside of Florida. At this point, the 4:1 ratio of undergraduate non-resident to resident tuition, and 3:1 ratio of graduate non-resident to resident tuition ensures that non-residents are covering more than the full cost of instruction (without Florida taxpayer subsidy). • At the same time, it will be essential to effectively manage enrollment growth, limiting student headcount to approximately 40,000 students (25 percent at the graduate level) at USF while increasing the FTE yield (i.e. more full-time research graduate students). • USF must significantly increase annual giving and build a more robust endowment, with a particular focus on strategic fundraising (to support student scholarships and fellowships, as well as endowed chairs and professorships), if it is to strengthen its position for membership in the AAU.

USF’s Students Florida is home to five of the 20 largest public universities (by headcount) in the nation. The product of population growth, increasing demand for access to higher education, historically low tuition, a pattern of funding enrollment growth, and a reluctance to build new institutions on the part of state government, USF’s infrastructure (from investment in additional faculty and advisors, to adequacy of instructional space and need-based financial aid) has failed to keep pace with rapidly expanding student enrollment. Moreover, a tendency toward part-time enrollment (evidenced by the fact that USF was ranked 16th by headcount yet only 24th by FTE, among the nation’s largest public universities in Fall 2009), has placed an additional burden on institutional infrastructure, has reduced operational efficiencies, and has stifled improvements in student success (i.e. retention and graduation rates). The data on pages 29-48 further speak to the relatively large student enrollment at USF along with the less than optimal headcount to FTE relationship. While gains in both the academic quality (SAT/ACT scores, high school GPA, and percentage of freshmen in the top 10 percent of their high school class) and diversity (including both socioeconomic profile as demonstrated by a relatively high percentage of Pell recipients at 27 percent and racial/ethnic representation) of first-time-in-college (FTIC) students are impressive, the number and percentage of students enrolled in education abroad, and the number and percentage of international students remains very low, particularly for an institution that claims “Global Literacy and Impact” as a strategic priority. It is anticipated that the imminent restructuring of USF World combined with such initiatives as INTO USF, the Confucius Institute, the Center for India Studies, the Institute for the Study of Latin America and the Caribbean, the Center for the Study of International Languages and Culture, and the Global Academic Partners (GAP) program, will stimulate growth in international student enrollment and Education Abroad. The number and percentage of graduate students enrolled at USF are nearing the institutional goal of 25 percent of headcount, although the graduate student share of total student FTE lags, suggesting too few full-time research graduate students. This is, perhaps, manifested in the relatively low level of Ph.D. degree production as the doctoral student pipeline appears to empty too slowly. The recent approval of new Ph.D. programs (in economics, government, history, and sociology) has increased doctoral student capacity and, along with a recent $2.0 million infusion of recurring funds (and $500,000 in non-recurring funds) to support doctoral students is, over time, expected to increase the number of research doctorates awarded on an annual basis. The relationship of student enrollment to faculty cohort results in too few small classes (29 percent with fewer than 20 students) which are characteristic of AAU institutions, particularly at the undergraduate upper level and graduate level, as well as too few large classes (14 percent with more than 50 students, due to a limited number of classrooms able to accommodate larger numbers of students) that support greater instructional efficiency at the undergraduate lower level. Once again, the most compelling data point is the student to faculty ratio which, at 27:1 falls short of all AAU members and prospects, Carnegie RU/VH institutions, and all but one of Florida’s research universities. Equally important is the low six-year graduation rate for FTIC students. With just 49 percent of freshmen graduating within six years, USF falls short of all public AAU institutions, most AAU prospects, and statewide peers. Undergraduate student retention, persistence and time-to-graduation must show significant improvement if USF is to join the ranks of the nation’s very best public research universities in the future. To this end, USF has implemented a wide range of strategies, beginning in 2005, to improve student success, with the most significant results anticipated with the Summer/Fall 2006 freshman class. These initiatives have included improving the academic preparedness/ selectivity of incoming students, implementing “intrusive” advising and early interventions by reducing the studentto-advisor ratio (from 600:1 in 2004-2005 to 381:1 in 2009-2010), enhancing financial aid through marketing FAFSA, designing a searchable scholarship database, packaging of financial aid offers earlier in the year, converting to a direct loan program, developing and implementing the “Don’t Stop, Don’t Drop” program, designing and implementing a required Life Skills for Collegiate Success program (financial literacy, Alcohol EDU, academic integrity, and public safety), implementing Summer Stampede access programs, enhancing instructional and learning strategies (e.g.

large sections paired with recitation breakouts), implementing mandatory residential living for the freshman year, consolidating the Student Success Center in the library, revising the class schedule to offer more sections and to better utilize classroom space especially in high demand courses and those with large enrollments, implementing Blackboard and Eluminate enhancements along with investing $1.3 million in classroom instructional technology enhancements, effecting academic policy changes including a declaration of major upon admission, maintaining affordable tuition, improving financial aid and scholarship services, enhancing student orientation, increasing student engagement (e.g. REU, Volunteer USF, etc.), expanding cooperation between Academic Affairs and Student Affairs with expanded living and learning communities, construction of new and renovation of existing instructional and learning facilities, and extending library investments through capital investments, enhancements of collections and 24/5 service. Overall, there has been a renewed focus on institutional effectiveness and quality assurance which is essential to meeting the principles associated with continued regional accreditation by the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools. Future Considerations: •

The USF Student Success Council will continue the work of the USF-wide Student Success Task Force, driving stronger collaboration between Academic Affairs and Student Affairs, with a focus on:

o o o

Planned initiatives include hosting a student success conference, identifying “gatekeeper” courses, establishing a model for financial aid leveraging, continued improvement of the Learning Commons and the Student Success Center, implementing a 3-year degree completion program, expanding capacity for education abroad and funded global experiences through USF World, developing a plan for The Learning Center (TLC), building and launching a USF branded online application, and fully implementing Degree Works, an electronic degree audit system.

•

With the growth of the Florida State College System (offering four year degrees), and the arrival of more higher education providers (including proprietary and online institutions) in Florida, USF will need to carefully plan and manage future enrollment – particularly with regard to a projected decline in qualified undergraduate transfer students. Working in close collaboration with other USF System institutions, and Hillsborough Community College in particular, continuing student headcount is not expected to exceed approximately 40,000 (25 percent at the graduate level), with expectations of the IPEDS FTE to climb beyond the current level of 32,248, so driving the headcount to FTE ratio of 0.81 toward the 0.90 level. That is, USF must drive more full-time undergraduate and graduate enrollment, so accelerating students’ time to graduation.

•

As graduation rates improve, USF must be prepared to replenish the pipeline of qualified undergraduate and graduate students and to grow the Ph.D. pipeline. This will require new investments, especially privately funded scholarships and fellowships, to attract and retain world class doctoral level talent to USF.

•

The selectivity profile of all admitted/enrolled student groups: FTICs, undergraduate transfers, master’s, doctoral, and professional is expected to continue to rise based upon ACT/SAT/GRE/GMAT/MCAT scores, the number of students in the top 10 percent of their high school class, high school grade point average, and undergraduate grade point average. The relatively high number of Pell Grant recipients, along with the ethnic and racial diversity of USF’s student body is expected to be maintained.

•

USF will seek to increase the freshman retention rate (with a goal of 87 percent), to advance the 6-year graduation rate to 51 percent, and award 290 doctorates in 2011.

Institutionalizing student success as a permanent priority, Integrating student success into the institutional culture, and Building an institutional research capacity to support student success initiatives.

•

USF expects to increase the geographical diversity of its student talent base, so bringing different experiences and perspectives to the classroom, by increasing the number of full fee-paying out-of-state and international students at both the undergraduate and graduate levels.

•

While USF will likely reduce its level of scholarship support for National Merit, National Achievement and National Hispanic scholars, the numbers of those enrolled will be expected to maintain.

•

USF World will significantly enhance student participation in education abroad opportunities.

•

USF must continue to examine the utility of emerging technologies (including classroom capture) to enhance academic delivery and student learning.

USF’s Faculty USF’s faculty members continue to represent the institution’s most precious asset. The data on pages 49-57 paint a picture of a rather small (for the size of the institution) yet highly accomplished faculty cohort. At 1,281 tenured and tenure-earning faculty, and 1,261 full-time instructional staff, the resulting student-to-faculty ratio of 27:1 positions USF dead last among the 63 Carnegie public research universities with very high activity, and lagging all public AAU universities. While significantly disadvantaging USF in the area of student success and overall research productivity, the university’s professors are respectably positioned with public AAU institutions in regard to faculty awards (including a Fellow of the American Academy in Rome, Fulbright Scholars, Getty Scholars, Guggenheim Fellows, and NSF CAREER Award winners), citation impact, and total research expenditures per tenured and tenure-earning faculty. USF tenured and tenure-earning faculty exceeded the performance of their colleagues at all Florida research universities in averaging $217,000 in total research expenditures. The recruitment and retention of faculty talent, which represents the foundation of any great university, will be challenging as salary levels for professor ($101,912), associate professor ($74,003), and assistant professor ($62,764) ranks, each falls short of 34 of the 35 public AAU institutions and most of the AAU prospects. Even in the Florida market, USF currently ranks sixth among the seven research universities for the rank of professor, fifth for associate professors, and sixth for assistant professors. During the 2008-2009 academic year, the USF Board of Trustees and USF Chapter of the United Faculty of Florida agreed on salary increases amounting to an average of 3.1 percent (at a time when the national average increase was 1.2 percent), which moderately enhanced USF’s position. It is hoped that ratification of the current tentative agreement on a 3-year contract (through academic year 2012-2013) will help to bring USF faculty members’ salaries into closer alignment with national levels. Moreover, establishing (and protecting) a nationally competitive benefits package is essential, which is why the recent introduction of domestic partner benefits and a parental leave policy were so important. Suffice it to say, there remains considerable room for improvement to USF faculty salaries and benefits if we are to be successful in recruiting and retaining more world class faculty members. Finally, the relatively small number of faculty (3) who hold membership in the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, or the Institute of Medicine represents a dilemma for USF. Preferring to invest limited institutional resources in the retention and “cultivation” of our own cohort of prospective members of the national academies, rather than “buying” them from other universities, suggests that strategic progress in this important area will be limited.

Future Considerations: • Growing the tenured and tenure-earning (and other full-time) faculty cohort while managing student enrollment (at 40,000 headcount) will be essential to USF’s success in progressing along its strategic path, and improving the student to faculty ratio. • With the Early Retirement Incentive Program, and the State’s DROP program, further reducing the number of tenured and tenure-earning faculty in academic year 2010-2011, the continuing economic challenges prompted by a state budget deficit limits USF’s ability to grow its faculty cohort at the desired rate. • Equally important will be increasing the university’s investment in faculty talent by raising salary levels (and maintaining or improving the benefits package, as well as considering faculty housing) to that of public AAU institutions. Without improvement, the recruitment and retention of the best and brightest faculty members will continue to be a challenge for USF. • The slow economic recovery (and diminishing public investment in the State University System of Florida) and relatively low resident tuition rates, significantly limit available resources to enhance faculty recruitment, support and retention. Significant growth in the number of privately funded (endowed) chairs and professorships will be essential to building USF’s faculty base. • USF must carefully plan for capital investments to provide adequate research space, equipment and library resources to support new faculty members, particularly in the field of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM).

USF’s Research Enterprise USF’s impressive research trajectory is reinforced on pages 58-69, with a solid placement among long-established AAU institutions for both Total Research Expenditures (29th when juxtaposed against the 35 public AAUs) and Federal Research Expenditures (25th), as reported by the National Science Foundation. Supported by a solid base of postdoctoral fellows (26th and strengthened by a new Office of Postdoctoral Affairs at USF) and non-faculty researchers with doctorates (17th), the recently reported citation impact of USF faculty research publications, places USF at #110 among the World’s 500 High Impact Universities (2010), and second among Florida institutions. In the broad realm of innovation, commercialization and technology transfer, as measured by invention disclosures received, total patents issued, total license/options executed, cumulative active licenses, startups initiated and license income received, USF fares exceedingly well when compared with the 35 public AAU institutions. Licensing revenues are expected to climb as more faculty and student inventions (such as the recent licensing of the TC-5214 antidepressant drug) are commercialized. Guided by the Senior Vice President for Research and Innovation, USF’s signature interdisciplinary research programs exploit the discovery of new knowledge at the interface of discrete disciplines, and include integrated neurosciences, diabetes and autoimmune disorders, sustainable healthy communities (including clean energy, water, public health, oceanography, and the built environment), veterans’ reintegration, along with drug discovery and development. Future Considerations: •

Further expansion of USF’s research enterprise will in large part be dependent upon the availability of expanded, cutting-edge research laboratories. Additional space in the Interdisciplinary Research Building, and the Interdisciplinary Science Teaching and Research Facility will not accommodate a significantly enlarged cohort of scientists and engineers. 8

•

Equally important, as USF seeks to grow its competitive federal research portfolio, will be ensuring the availability of state-of-the-art equipment (for many through shared use research cores) along with a robust pre-award and postaward management system to ensure institutional compliance and to ease the administrative burden on principal investigators.

•

USF’s location in the Tampa Bay region represents a major asset second only, perhaps, to the intellectual capital of the university community. Partnerships with other universities, industry, public and private sector research organizations (such as SRI, Draper, Jackson Labs and Mote Marine Laboratory), and community-based organizations (such as hospitals and school districts) will be essential to expanding USF’s research enterprise in the future.

•

Promoting and rewarding internal collaboration (for external competition) across colleges, departments and disciplines will continue to be an important priority. Not only will this better position USF faculty to compete successfully for federal research awards but the greater synergies help establish a critical mass of scholars in what are, for the most part, comparatively small departments at USF.

•

A characteristic of comprehensive public research universities (represented by the vast majority of public AAU members) is the breadth and diversity of scholarly, scientific and creative inquiry across the university community. While the STEM field will likely witness growing prominence globally, nationally and in the context of New Florida, the arts, humanities and social sciences must continue to be supported with an emphasis on research relevance and impact.

•

Finally, providing enhanced investment in faculty and student inventions and discoveries, along with expanded support for commercialization, through the USF Research Foundation and the Division of Patents and Licensing, will be essential to maturing the university’s research enterprise in the future.

The USF Community While the empirical data presented in this report is helpful in assessing progress, setting priorities and informing decisions, it cannot capture the breadth of accomplishments at a comprehensive public research university. For instance, USF’s well-regarded Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) is realizing great success in connecting the benefits and relevance of pursuing a baccalaureate degree at one of the nation’s top research universities. While not for everyone, the distinctive opportunities are recognized as a value-addition for those contemplating a path to graduate school or progress to a first professional degree (including medical and law school). Not surprisingly, today we are witnessing increasing success in the number of USF undergraduate students being awarded prestigious national awards, including Goldwater, Gilman, and Fulbright scholarships. Meanwhile, USF continues to build its institutional base in pursuit of membership in the Association of Research Libraries, and toward sheltering a chapter of Phi Beta Kappa, the nation’s oldest and most prestigious honor society in the liberal arts and sciences. To this end, the College of Arts and Sciences, in collaboration with the Office of the Provost and the Tampa Mayor’s Office, sponsors a PBK Faculty Alumni Lecture Series, bringing notable scholars and intellectuals to share their thoughts with members of the university and broader communities. Building upon the Carnegie Foundation’s classification of USF as an “Engaged University,” and recognizing the incomparable strength of asset represented by our community, the university took a major step forward last year in establishing the USF Office of Community Engagement. Seeking to expand local and global initiatives that strengthen and sustain healthy communities and improve the quality of life for all, the office carries out its mission by building mutually beneficial and reciprocal university-community partnerships founded on engaged scholarship and servicelearning models.

At the same time, USF established the Office of Sustainability to coordinate and build partnerships that advance the institution’s goal of creating a sustainable campus environment. The office is aligned closely with the new School of Global Sustainability which, along with the Carol and Frank Morsani Center for Advanced Health Care, USF’s participation in iTunes University, USF Health’s proposed Center for Advanced Medical Learning and Simulation (CAMLS) in the heart of downtown Tampa, INTO USF (a public-private partnership that is expanding international student enrollment), USF’s partnership in the Mote Aquaculture Research Park, and the new healthcare leadership track created by USF’s College of Medicine and Lehigh Valley Health Network, demonstrates the university’s continuing commitment to seeking innovative and entrepreneurial solutions. In spite of the broader financial slowdown, capital construction continues at USF providing a significant economic boost and jobs for the community. In the coming year, the university will open the Dr. Kiran C. Patel Center for Global Solutions ($23.8 million), the Music Teaching and Performance Building ($46.6 million), the Campus Recreation Center Expansion and Southeast Student Dining Facility (the Wellness and Nutrition Center, $14.9 million), the Interdisciplinary Science Teaching and Research Facility ($92.8 million), and new USF Athletic facilities ($30.0 million). Together, these new investments in the lives of USF students, faculty and staff are a symbol of the university’s commitment to growth even in the most challenging of times.

Future Priorities As we contemplate the final two years of the current strategic plan, and begin to shape a vision for the next phase, USF appears to be faced with four big challenges: • • • •

The worst student-to-faculty ratio in the nation, An unacceptably low graduation rate for FTIC students, A less than robust institutional infrastructure, and The changing landscape of higher education in Florida

Compounded by a slow economic recovery and a radical shift in the funding model for Florida’s public universities (from high appropriation/low tuition enrollment growth funding, to diminishing appropriation/rising tuition performance-based funding), USF’s innovative spirit will be tested as together we confront these challenges while balancing affordability, access, quality, accountability as well as strengthening our competitive position locally and in both national and global contexts. As we continue the university’s expected strategic progress in the coming years, we must redouble our collective efforts to recruit, reward, and retain more talented full-time faculty members; embrace, “own,” and celebrate our students’ success; make enhancements to our support personnel, policies, space, equipment, and library; and creatively confront the competition (from the state colleges to private and for-profit providers) as they seek to grow their share of the higher education market in Florida, through exploiting technology-based delivery of academic programs and like strategies. Above all, USF’s greatest relevance will be found in solidifying its position as a national research powerhouse and an engine for economic growth for the region, the state and nation.

A Performance Update: Advancing USFâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Strategic Plan

Overview An examination of the University of South Florida juxtaposed with peer institutions, including public AAU institutions, AAU prospects, and Florida research institutions, provides the university community and decision makers with relevant data aligned with the vision and goals of the institution, as delineated in the USF 2007-2012 Strategic Plan1.

University Leadership USF System Board of Trustees John B. Ramil, Chair Harold W. Mullis, Vice Chair Lee E. Arnold, Jr. Margarita R. Cancio, M.D. W. Gene Engle Cesar R. Hernandez Brian D. Lamb Elizabeth Larkin Rhea F. Law Debbie Nye Sembler Byron E. Shinn Sherrill M. Tomasino Jordan B. Zimmerman

USF Leadership Judy Genshaft, President Ralph Wilcox, Provost and Executive Vice President Karen Holbrook, Senior Vice President for Research and Innovation Stephen Klasko, Senior Vice President for USF Health Nick Trivunovich, Vice President for Business and Finance Joel Momberg, Vice President for Advancement Jennifer Capeheart-Meningall, Vice President for Student Affairs Michael Pearce, Vice President for Information Technologies Michael Hoad, Vice President for Communications and Marketing Sandy Lovins, Vice President for Administrative Services

The 2007-2012 Strategic Plan reflects the immediate goals and objectives of the University of South Florida, the Tampa member institution of the USF System; the USF System 2010-2015 Strategic Plan differs from the USF 2007-2012 Strategic Plan.

University of South Florida About The University of South Florida, located in Tampa, Florida, is one of the nation’s top public research universities and one of only 25 public research universities nationwide with very high research activity that is designated as community engaged by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. As a member of the USF System, USF is comprised of the campus located in Tampa, USF Health, and the College of Marine Science. Prior to the recent development of a USF System Strategic Plan, the USF 2007-2012 Strategic Plan served as an initial guide for the young and emerging system. With an inherently differentiated mission and characteristics, USF continues its course guided by a strategic plan crafted for a metropolitan research institution.

USF Strategic Plan Mission As Florida’s leading metropolitan research university, USF is dedicated to excellence in: • Student access and success in an engaged, and interdisciplinary, learner-centered environment; • Research and scientific discovery, including the generation, dissemination, and translation of new knowledge across disciplines; to strengthen the economy; to promote civic culture and the arts; and to design and build sustainable, healthy communities; and • Embracing innovation, and supporting scholarly and artistic engagement to build a community of learners together with significant and sustainable university-community partnerships and collaborations.

Vision The University of South Florida envisions itself as a pre-eminent research university with state, national, and global impact, and positioned for membership in the Association of American Universities (AAU).

Goals I.

Expanding world-class interdisciplinary research, creative, and scholarly endeavors.

II. Promoting globally competitive undergraduate, graduate and professional programs that support interdisciplinary inquiry, intellectual development, knowledge and skill acquisition, and student success through a diverse, fullyengaged, learner-centered campus environment. III. Expanding local and global engagement initiatives to strengthen and sustain healthy communities and to improve the quality of life. IV. Enhancing all sources of revenue, and maximizing effectiveness in business practices and financial management to establish a strong and sustainable economic base in support of USF’s growth.

Association of American Universities (AAU) Overview The Association of American Universities (AAU) is a nonprofit organization of 63 leading public and private research universities in the United States and Canada. Founded in 1900 to advance the international standing of U.S. research universities, AAU today focuses on issues that are important to research-intensive universities, such as funding for research, research policy issues, and graduate and undergraduate education. AAU member universities are on the leading edge of innovation, scholarship, and solutions that contribute to the nation’s economy, security, and well-being. The 63 AAU universities in the United States award more than one-half of all U.S. doctoral degrees and 55 percent of those in the sciences and engineering. AAU programs and projects address institutional issues facing its member universities, as well as government actions that affect these and other universities. AAU works to maintain the productive partnership between the nation’s research universities and the federal government. The major activities of the association include federal government relations, policy studies, and public affairs. Membership in the association is by invitation.

Eligibility Criteria A standing Membership Committee, charged with periodically evaluating non-member universities for invitation to membership, is guided by a set of Membership Principles and Membership Indicators. The Membership Indicators are a two-phase set of quantitative measures used to “assess the breadth and quality of university programs of research and graduate education” (AAU Website, 2010). Phase I 1. Competitively funded federal research support: These data are collected by the National Science Foundation. The Membership Committee has been using obligations, which are the only measures that break down federal support by agency. The committee has recently switched to using NSF research expenditure data, which are more accurate, with a correction factor to subtract the estimated proportion of university expenditures drawn from USDA. Most USDA funding is not allocated competitively, and USDA support accordingly is included as a Phase II indicator. 2. Membership in the National Academies (National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine): The National Academies’ membership database maintains the current institutional affiliation of its members. 3. National Research Council (NRC)faculty quality ratings: These ratings are drawn from the decennial national assessment of research-doctorate programs conducted by the NRC. Though the data become dated between surveys, the committee believes that they continue to provide a valuable peer-assessment of faculty quality. The last NRC report was published in 1995 based on 1993 data; preparation for the next NRC assessment is currently underway.

4. Faculty arts and humanities awards, fellowships, and memberships: For its last research doctorate assessment, NRC compiled a list of awards, fellowships, and memberships signifying faculty achievement primarily in arts and humanities fields. The Membership Committee has expanded this list and will use it as an additional assessment of the distinction of an institutionâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s faculty, focusing on the arts and humanities faculty (Attachment 1). Additional appropriate awards, fellowships, and memberships will be added to this list as they are identified. 5. Citations: The U.S. University Science Indicators citations database provides an annually updated measure of both research volume and quality and will provide a valuable complement to the first four indicators listed above. Phase II 1. USDA, state, and industrial research funding: Though these three sources of academic research support fund important, high-quality research, they will be treated as Phase II indicators since they are generally not allocated through competitive, merit-review processes. Competitively funded USDA research programs that can be separately identified in reported data will be included in phase I data. 2. Doctoral education: The committee will use number of Ph.D.s granted annually as well as tabulate the distribution of Ph.D.s across broad disciplinary categories (e.g., engineering but not aerospace engineering), using Department of Education IPEDS (Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System) data. These data will be treated as Phase II indicators to de-emphasize the quantitative dimensions of Ph.D. programs and avoid sending an unintended signal to institutions to increase Ph.D. output at a time when many institutions are or are considering scaling back their Ph.D. programs. 3. Number of postdoctoral appointees: The committee will use NSF-compiled data from institutions on postdoctoral appointees, most of whom are in the health sciences, physical sciences, and engineering. Postdoctoral education is an increasingly important component of university research and education activities that the committee believes should be tracked in AAU membership indicators. However, because postdoctoral activity is highly correlated with university research and because self-reported postdoctoral data are less uniform than data on federally funded research, postdoctoral appointees will be treated as a Phase II indicator. 4. Undergraduate education: The committee will assess the institutionâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s undergraduate programs to determine that the institution is meeting its commitment to undergraduate education. Recognizing that differing institutional missions among research universities dictate different ways of providing undergraduate education, the committee will be flexible in this assessment. A number of measures have been suggested, including some that focus on input and others that look primarily at output variables. These are at this time imperfect, but may provide some guidance to the committee in making its judgments on this topic.

Strategic Performance Metrics

Faculty • Tenured / Tenure Track Faculty • Full-Time Instructional Staff • Faculty Awards * • National Academy Members * • Citation Impact * • Total Research Expenditures per Tenured / Tenure Track Faculty • Full Professors Average Salary • Associate Professors Average Salary • Assistant Professors Average Salary

Infrastructure • Total University Expenditures • Total Expenditures per Student FTE • Tuition & Fees • Tuition & Fee Revenues per Total Student FTE • State Appropriations • State Appropriations per Student FTE • Annual Giving • Endowment • Endowment per Total Student FTE

Students • Total Student Headcount • Total Student FTE • Graduate Student Headcount • Percent Graduate Student Headcount • Doctorates Awarded ** • First Time in College (FTIC) Student Enrollment • Median SAT Score * • FTICs in Top 10% of High School Class • National Merit Scholars • Percent Undergraduates Receiving Pell Grant Aid • Percent of Classes with Fewer than 20 Students • Percent of Classes with 50 or More Students • Freshman Retention Rates • Six Year Graduation Rate for First Time in College (FTIC) Students • International Student Headcount • Percent International Student Headcount • Students Studying Abroad • Percent Students Studying Abroad • Student-to-Faculty Ratio

Research • NSF Total Research Expenditures • AAU Federal Research Expenditures * • NSF Non-Federal Research Expenditures • Research Performance Index (RPI) • Postdoctoral Appointees ** • Non-Faculty Researchers with Doctorates • Invention Disclosures Received • Total Patents Issued • Total Licenses / Options Executed • Cumulative Active Licenses • License Income Received • Startups Initiated

* AAU Indicator – Phase I ** AAU Indicator – Phase II

How to Use This Book

PERFORMANCE MEASURE Metric examined on the following two pages.

DEFINITION Definition as determined by data source.

SOURCE & TYPE Government, academic, and commercial sources utilized as standards in higher education.

TOTAL UNIVERSITY EXPENDITURES

Definition:

This measure reflects total university expenditures as a sum of the operating and non-operating expenses and deductions of the institution as reported in the IPEDS Finance component.

Source: IPEDS

Type: IPEDS

USF System includes all member institutions (USF, USF St. Petersburg, USF Sarasota-Manatee, USF Polytechnic). USF refers to the campus located in Tampa which includes USF Health and the College of Marine Science.

USF SYSTEM / USF Reminder of definition of USF System and USF. PUBLIC AAU INSTITUTIONS Public AAU institutions and USF performance in most recent year available. Multi-year trend data is located on the back page.

USF PERFORMANCE USF or USF System data are highlighed with a green bar and exact data is noted to the right.

USF System & AAU PublicInstitutions AAU Institutions USF System & Public Total Expenditures, Total Expenditures, FY 2008FY2008 Michigan UCLA Ohio State Penn State Washington UC Davis Minnesota UC San Diego UNC Chapel Hill Wisconsin-Madison Virginia Iowa UT Austin Texas A&M Illinois, Urb-Ch Florida UC Berkeley Stony Brook Michigan State UC Irvine Rutgers Missouri Pittsburgh Arizona Maryland, College Park Purdue Indiana Georgia Tech USF Kansas Buffalo Colorado Iowa State Nebraska UC Santa Barbara Oregon

PUBLIC AAUs Georgia Institute of Technology Indiana University Iowa State University Michigan State University The Ohio State University Pennsylvania State University Purdue University Rutgers University Stony Brook University Texas A&M University University at Buffalo University of Arizona University of California, Davis University of California, Berkeley University of California, Irvine University of California, Los Angeles University of California, San Diego University of California, Santa Barbara University of Colorado at Boulder University of Florida University Illinois, Urbana-Champaign University of Iowa University of Kansas University of Maryland, College Park University of Michigan University of Minnesota, Twin Cities University of Missouri, Columbia University of Nebraska, Lincoln University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill University of Oregon University of Pittsburgh University of Texas, Austin University of Virginia University of Washington University of WisconsinMadison

AAU PROSPECTS Arizona State University Colorado State University North Carolina State University University of Alabama, Birmingham University of Cincinnati University of Georgia University of Illinois, Chicago University of Utah Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

NATIONAL PEERS North Carolina State University Rutgers University* Stony Brook University* University at Buffalo* University of Alabama, Birmingham University of California, Irvine* University of Cincinnati University of Illinois, Chicago

$977,784

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

Dollars in Thousands

$1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $7,000,000

Thousands

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami *AAU member

PUBLIC AAUS 35 institutions currently members of AAU. AAU PROSPECTS 9 public institutions with similar characteristics as USF that are not currently AAU members but are potential candidates. NATIONAL PEERS 8 institutions selected based upon similarity of charactistics. Includes 3 AAU members.

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES In addition to USF, 6 universities in Florida designated as research universites by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

For the first time, the report examines both inputs (i.e., tuition and fees, faculty salaries) and outputs (i.e., freshman retention rate, research expenditures).

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

Total University Expenditures Total Expenditures per FTE Tuition & Fees Tuition & Fee Revenue per FTE State Appropriations State Appropriations per FTE Annual Giving Endowment Endowment per FTE

$1,600,000,000

Student Measures Total Student Headcount Total Student FTE Graduate Student Headcount Doctorates Awarded ** FTIC Student Enrollment National Merit Scholars Percent Undergraduates Receiving Pell Grant Aid Percent of Classes with Fewer than 20 Students Percent of Classes with 50 or More Students Freshman Retention Rates Six Year Graduation Rate for First Time in College Students International Students % International Students Students Studying Abroad % Students Studying Abroad Student-to-Faculty Ratio

UF Miami

$1,800,000,000

Dollars in Thousands

Infrastructure Measures

USF System Florida Research Universities USF System & Florida& Research University Peers Expenditures, FY 2002 - FY 2008 TotalTotal Expenditures, FY2002 - FY2008

$2,000,000,000

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

$1,400,000,000 $1,200,000,000

Mean

$1,000,000,000

USF

$800,000,000

FSU

$600,000,000

UCF FIU

$400,000,000

FAU

$200,000,000 $0 2002

Tenured / Tenure Track Faculty Full-Time Instructional Staff Faculty Awards * National Academy Members * Citation Impact * Total Research Expenditures per Tenured / Tenure Track Faculty Full Professors Avg. Salary Associate Professors Avg. Salary Assistant Professors Avg. Salary

Indicators guide AAU Membership Committee in the evaluation of nonmember universities.

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2005

2006

2007

2008

AAU High

$5,000,000,000 $4,000,000,000 $3,000,000,000 Public AAU 75% Mean

$2,000,000,000

Public AAU 25%

$1,000,000,000

USF

AAU Low

$0 2002

Research Measures

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

PUBLIC AAU INSTITUTIONS Multi-year trend data comparing USF’s performance with the highest performing, lowest performing and interquartile ranges of the 35 public AAU institutions. Mean is noted with a red dashed line.

USF& System & AAU Prospects USF System AAU Prospects Total Expenditures, 2002 - FY 2008 Total Expenditures, FY2002 -FY FY2008

$2,500,000,000

Utah UAB

$2,000,000,000 Dollars in Millions

AAU INDICATOR • Phase I • Phase II

2004

$6,000,000,000

Faculty Measures

NSF Total Research Expenditures AAU Federal Research Expenditures * NSF Non-Federal Research Expenditures Research Performance Index Postdoctoral Appointees ** Non-Faculty Researchers with Doctorates Invention Disclosures Received Total Patents Issued Licenses/Options Executed Cumulative Active Licenses License Income Received Startups Initiated

2003

USF System Public &AAU Institutions USF &System Public AAU Institutions Total Expenditures, 2002 - FY 2008 Total Expenditures, FY2002 FY - FY2008

$7,000,000,000

Dollars in Millions

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS Metrics are divided into four categories: • Infrastructure • Student • Faculty • Research

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Multi-year trend data comparing USF’s performance with other Florida research universities. Mean is noted with a red dashed line. • USF • FAU • FIU • FSU • UCF • UF • Miami

Illinois, Chicago

ASU Mean

$1,500,000,000

Georgia NC State

USF

$1,000,000,000

VA Tech Cincinnati Colorado State

$500,000,000 $0 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

AAU PROSPECTS Multi-year trend data comparing USF’s performance with 9 public institutions with similar characteristics as USF that are not currently AAU members but are potential candidates. Mean is noted with a red dashed line. • Arizona State • Colorado State • North Carolina State • Alabama, Birmingham • Cincinnati • Georgia • Illinois, Chicago • Utah • Virginia Tech

INFRASTRUCTURE

Strategic Performance Metrics

* AAU Indicator – Phase I ** AAU Indicator – Phase II

TOTAL UNIVERSITY EXPENDITURES

Definition:

Source:

This measure reflects total university expenditures as a sum of the operating and non-operating expenses and deductions of the institution as reported in the IPEDS Finance component.

IPEDS

Type: IPEDS

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF System & Public AAU Institutions Total Expenditures, Total Expenditures, FY 2008FY2008 Michigan UCLA Ohio State Penn State Washington UC Davis Minnesota UC San Diego UNC Chapel Hill Wisconsin-Madison Virginia Iowa UT Austin Texas A&M Illinois, Urb-Ch Florida UC Berkeley Stony Brook Michigan State UC Irvine Rutgers Missouri Pittsburgh Arizona Maryland, College Park Purdue Indiana Georgia Tech USF Kansas Buffalo Colorado Iowa State Nebraska UC Santa Barbara Oregon

$978

USF System Total University Expenditures FY 2009: $897,722,733

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

Dollars in Millions

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

$2,000,000,000 $1,600,000,000 Dollars in Thousands

Total University Expenditures Total Expenditures per FTE Tuition & Fees Tuition & Fee Revenue per FTE State Appropriations State Appropriations per FTE Annual Giving Endowment Endowment per FTE

Student Measures

$1,400,000,000 $1,200,000,000

Mean

$1,000,000,000

USF

$800,000,000

FSU

$600,000,000

UCF FIU

$400,000,000

FAU

$200,000,000 $0 2002

2005

2006

2007

2008

AAU High

$5,000,000,000 $4,000,000,000 $3,000,000,000 Public AAU 75% Mean

$2,000,000,000

Public AAU 25%

$1,000,000,000

USF

AAU Low

$0 2002

Research Measures

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2004

$6,000,000,000

Faculty Measures

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF& System & AAU Prospects USF System AAU Prospects Total Expenditures, 2002 - FY 2008 Total Expenditures, FY2002 -FY FY2008

$2,500,000,000

Utah UAB

Dollars in Millions

2003

USF System Public &AAU Institutions USF &System Public AAU Institutions Total Expenditures, 2002 - FY 2008 Total Expenditures, FY2002 FY - FY2008

$7,000,000,000

Dollars in Millions

Total Student Headcount Total Student FTE Graduate Student Headcount Doctorates Awarded ** FTIC Student Enrollment National Merit Scholars Percent Undergraduates Receiving Pell Grant Aid Percent of Classes with Fewer than 20 Students Percent of Classes with 50 or More Students Freshman Retention Rates Six Year Graduation Rate for First Time in College Students International Students % International Students Students Studying Abroad % Students Studying Abroad Student-to-Faculty Ratio

UF Miami

$1,800,000,000

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES Infrastructure Measures

USF System Florida Research Universities USF System & Florida& Research University Peers Total Expenditures, FY 2002 FY 2008 Total Expenditures, FY2002 - FY2008

$2,000,000,000

Illinois, Chicago

$1,500,000,000

ASU Mean Georgia NC State

USF

$1,000,000,000

VA Tech Cincinnati Colorado State

$500,000,000 $0 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

TOTAL UNIVERSITY EXPENDITURES PER STUDENT FTE Definition:

This measure reflects total expenses as a sum of the operating and non-operating expenses and deductions of the institution as reported in the IPEDS Finance component by total student FTE as reported in the IPEDS Enrollment survey.

Source: IPEDS

Type: IPEDS

System & Public Institutions USFUSF System & Public AAUAAU Institutions Expenditures per FTE, FY2008 TotalTotal Expenditures per FTE, FY 2008 Michigan UCLA Virginia UC San Diego Washington UC Davis UNC Chapel Hill Stony Brook Iowa Penn State Ohio State UC Irvine Minnesota Pittsburgh Missouri Georgia Tech Wisconsin-Madison UC Berkeley Rutgers Illinois, Urb-Ch Texas A&M UT Austin Arizona Maryland, College Park Michigan State Florida Buffalo Kansas Nebraska Purdue Iowa State UC Santa Barbara Indiana Colorado Oregon USF

NATIONAL PEERS

USF System Total University Expenditures per Student FTE FY 2009: $27,838 $27 $0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

Dollars in Thousands

$120

$140

$160

Thousands

North Carolina State University Rutgers University* Stony Brook University* University at Buffalo* University of Alabama, Birmingham University of California, Irvine* University of Cincinnati University of Illinois, Chicago

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

$140,000

Dollars in Thousands

Total University Expenditures Total Expenditures per FTE Tuition & Fees Tuition & Fee Revenue per FTE State Appropriations State Appropriations per FTE Annual Giving Endowment Endowment per FTE

Student Measures

Faculty Measures Tenured / Tenure Track Faculty Full-Time Instructional Staff Faculty Awards * National Academy Members * Citation Impact * Total Research Expenditures per Tenured / Tenure Track Faculty Full Professors Avg. Salary Associate Professors Avg. Salary Assistant Professors Avg. Salary

$100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000

Mean UF

$20,000

FSU FAU FIU UCF

USF

$0 2002

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

AAU High

$140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000

Public AAU 75%

$60,000

Mean

$40,000

Public AAU 25%

$20,000

AAU Low

USF

$0 2002

Research Measures

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System & AAU&Prospects USF System AAU Prospects Total Expenditures per FY2002 FTE, FY-2002 - FY 2008 Total Expenditures per FTE, FY2008

$180,000

UAB

$160,000 $140,000 Dollars in Thousands

2003

USF USF System & Public AAUAAU Institutions System & Public Institutions Expenditures per FTE, FY 2002 - FY 2008 TotalTotal Expenditures per FTE, FY2002 - FY2008

$160,000

Dollars in Thousands

Miami

$120,000

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES Infrastructure Measures

USF Peers USFSystem System& &Florida FloridaResearch ResearchUniversity Universities Total 2002 --FY 2008 TotalExpenditures Expendituresper perFTE, FTE,FY FY2002 FY2008

$120,000 $100,000

Utah Illinois, Chicago

$80,000

Mean NC State Cincinnati Georgia VA Tech Colorado State

$60,000 $40,000 $20,000

USF ASU

$0 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

TUITION & FEES: IN-STATE, UNDERGRADUATE

PUBLIC AAUs

Definition:

Georgia Institute of Technology Indiana University Iowa State University Michigan State University The Ohio State University Pennsylvania State University Purdue University Rutgers University Stony Brook University Texas A&M University University at Buffalo University of Arizona University of California, Davis University of California, Berkeley University of California, Irvine University of California, Los Angeles University of California, San Diego University of California, Santa Barbara University of Colorado at Boulder University of Florida University Illinois, Urbana-Champaign University of Iowa University of Kansas University of Maryland, College Park University of Michigan University of Minnesota, Twin Cities University of Missouri, Columbia University of Nebraska, Lincoln University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill University of Oregon University of Pittsburgh University of Texas, Austin University of Virginia University of Washington University of WisconsinMadison

Source:

Charges to full-time undergraduate students for the full academic year, specifically the tuition charge IPEDS by the institution to those students who meet the stateâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s or institutionâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s residency requirements; as Type: reported in the IPEDS Institutional Characteristics component. IPEDS, NSF USF System includes all member institutions (USF, USF St. Petersburg, USF Sarasota-Manatee, USF Polytechnic). USF refers to the campus located in Tampa which includes USF Health and the College of Marine Science.

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF Undergraduate System & PublicTuition AAU Institutions In-State Average & Fees, 2008/09 In-State Undergraduate Tuition & Fees, 2008-09 Penn State Pittsburgh Illinois, Urb-Ch Rutgers Michigan Michigan State Minnesota Virginia Ohio State UC Davis UT Austin Missouri UC Santa Barbara Indiana UC San Diego UC Irvine Maryland, College Park Texas A&M Purdue UC Berkeley Wisconsin-Madison UCLA Colorado Kansas Washington Nebraska Iowa Oregon Iowa State Buffalo Stony Brook Georgia Tech Arizona UNC Chapel Hill USF Florida

USF Tuition & Fees In-State, Undergraduate

$3,991 $0

$2,000

$4,000

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

FY 2009: $4,580 FY 2010: $5,200

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

Tuition & Fees in Dollars

$12,000

$14,000

$16,000

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

$35,000

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

$30,000

Infrastructure Measures

$25,000

Total University Expenditures Total Expenditures per FTE Tuition & Fees Tuition & Fee Revenue per FTE State Appropriations State Appropriations per FTE Annual Giving Endowment Endowment per FTE

USF USF System System && Florida Florida Research Research University UniversitiesPeers In-State Average Undergraduate Tuition & Fees, In-State Undergraduate Tuition & Fees, 20012001/02 - 2008 - 2008/09 Miami

$20,000 $15,000 $10,000

Mean FSU USF UCF FIU UF FAU

$5,000 $0 2001

2002

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF System & Public AAU Institutions In-State Average Undergraduate Fees,- 2008 2001/02 - 2008/09 In-State Undergraduate Tuition Tuition & Fees,&2001 $14,000

AAU High

$12,000 $10,000 Public AAU 75% Mean

$8,000

Public AAU 25%

$6,000

USF

$4,000

AAU Low

$2,000 $0 2001

2002

Research Measures NSF Total Research Expenditures AAU Federal Research Expenditures * NSF Non-Federal Research Expenditures Research Performance Index Postdoctoral Appointees ** Non-Faculty Researchers with Doctorates Invention Disclosures Received Total Patents Issued Licenses/Options Executed Cumulative Active Licenses License Income Received Startups Initiated

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

System & AAU Prospects USF USF System & AAU Prospects In-State Undergraduate TuitionTuition & Fees, 2001 -2001/02 2008 - 2008/09 In-State Average Undergraduate & Fees,

$12,000

Illinois, Chicago

$11,000 $10,000

Cincinnati

$9,000

VA Tech

$8,000 $7,000

Mean Colorado State ASU Georgia Utah NC State UAB

$6,000 $5,000 $4,000

USF

$3,000 $2,000 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

TUITION & FEES: OUT-OF-STATE, UNDERGRADUATE Definition:

Source:

USF System & Public AAU Institutions Out-of-State USF Average Undergraduate Tuition & Fees, 2008/09 System & Public AAU Institutions Out-of-State Undergraduate Tuition & Fees, 2008-09 Michigan Virginia UC Davis UC Santa Barbara UC San Diego UC Irvine UC Berkeley UCLA UT Austin Colorado Michigan State Illinois, Urb-Ch Georgia Tech Penn State Indiana Pittsburgh Purdue Washington Maryland, College Park UNC Chapel Hill Texas A&M Ohio State Wisconsin-Madison Rutgers Iowa Florida Oregon Missouri Arizona Iowa State Nebraska Kansas USF Minnesota Buffalo Stony Brook

NATIONAL PEERS

USF Tuition & Fees Out-of-State, Undergraduate $16,707

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$20,000

Tuition & Fees in Dollars

FY 2009: $15,390 FY 2010: $16,010

$25,000

$30,000

$35,000

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

$35,000

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

$30,000

Infrastructure Measures Total University Expenditures Total Expenditures per FTE Tuition & Fees Tuition & Fee Revenue per FTE State Appropriations State Appropriations per FTE Annual Giving Endowment Endowment per FTE

USFSystem System& &Florida FloridaResearch ResearchUniversities University Peers USF Out-of-State Average Undergraduate Tuition & Fees, Out-of-State Undergraduate Tuition & Fees, 2001 2001/02 - 2008 - 2008/09

$25,000 Mean UF UCF FSU

$20,000

USF

FIU FAU

$15,000 $10,000 $5,000 2001

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF &System Public AAU Institutions USF System Public &AAU Institutions Out-of-StateUndergraduate Average Undergraduate Tuition2001 & Fees, 2001/02 - 2008/09 Out-of-State Tuition & Fees, - 2008

$35,000

AAU High

$30,000 Public AAU 75%

$25,000

Mean Publicc AAU 25%

$20,000

USF

$15,000

AAU Low

$10,000 $5,000 2001

Miami

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System AAU Prospects USF System & AAU&Prospects Out-of-StateAverage Undergraduate Tuition &Tuition Fees, &2001 - 2008 Out-of-State Undergraduate Fees, 2001/02 - 2008/09

$25,000

Illinois, Chicago Cincinnati Colorado State VA Tech Georgia Mean ASU NC State

$20,000

USF Utah

$15,000

UAB

$10,000

$5,000 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

TUITION & FEES: IN-STATE, GRADUATE Definition:

Charges to full-time graduate students for the full academic year, specifically the tuition charge by the institution to those students who meet the stateâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s or institutionâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s residency requirements; as reported in the IPEDS Institutional Characteristics component.

PUBLIC AAUs

Source: IPEDS

Type:

IPEDS, NSF

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USFGraduate System &Tuition Public & AAU Institutions In-State Average Fees, 2008/09 In-State Graduate Tuition & Fees, 2008-09 Michigan Pittsburgh Penn State Rutgers Minnesota Oregon Virginia Illinois, Urb-Ch Michigan State UC Irvine UC Santa Barbara UC Davis Ohio State UC Berkeley UC San Diego Washington Wisconsin-Madison UCLA Maryland, College Park Colorado UT Austin Buffalo Florida Missouri Indiana Stony Brook Purdue Texas A&M Iowa USF Iowa State Kansas Georgia Tech Nebraska UNC Chapel Hill Arizona

NATIONAL PEERS

$7,292

USF Tuition & Fees In-State, Graduate FY 2009: $8,040 FY 2010: $8,850

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000 $18,000

Tuition & Fees in Dollars

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

$30,000

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

$25,000

USF Peers USFSystem System&&Florida FloridaResearch ResearchUniversity Universities In-State Average Graduate Tuition & Fees, 2001/02 In-State Graduate Tuition & Fees, 2001 - 2008- 2008/09 Miami

$20,000 $15,000 Mean UF FIU

$10,000

USF

$5,000

UCF FSU FAU

$0 2001

2002

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

System & Public Institutions USFUSF System & Public AAUAAU Institutions In-State Graduate Tuition & Fees, 20012001/02 - 2008 - 2008/09 In-State Average Graduate Tuition & Fees,

$18,000

AAU High

$16,000 $14,000 $12,000

Public AAU 75%

$10,000

Mean

$8,000

Public AAU 25%

$6,000

AAU Low

USF

$4,000 $2,000 $0 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF USFSystem System&& AAU AAU Prospects Prospects In-State Graduate - 2008 In-State Average Graduate Tuition Tuition&&Fees, Fees,2001 2001/02 - 2008/09

$14,000 $12,000

Cincinnati Illinois, Chicago

$10,000

VA Tech Mean

$8,000

USF

Colorado State ASU Georgia NC State Utah UAB

$6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $0 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

TUITION & FEES: OUT-OF-STATE, GRADUATE

PUBLIC AAUs

Definition:

Charges to full-time graduate students for the full academic year, specifically the tuition charge by the institution to those students who do not meet the stateâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s or institutionâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s residency requirements; as reported in the IPEDS Institutional Characteristics component.

Source: IPEDS

Type:

IPEDS, NSF

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF System & Public AAU&Institutions Out-of-State Average Graduate Tuition Fees, 2008/09 Out-of-State Graduate Tuition & Fees, 2008-09 Michigan Virginia UC Davis UC Santa Barbara UC San Diego UC Irvine UC Berkeley UCLA UT Austin Colorado Michigan State Illinois, Urb-Ch Georgia Tech Penn State Indiana Pittsburgh Purdue Washington Maryland, College Park UNC Chapel Hill Texas A&M Ohio State Wisconsin-Madison Rutgers USF Iowa Florida Oregon Missouri Arizona Iowa State Nebraska Kansas Minnesota Buffalo Stony Brook

NATIONAL PEERS

$21,141

USF Tuition & Fees Out-of-State, Graduate

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

FY 2009: $19,740 FY 2010: $18,690

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$20,000

Tuition & Fees in Dollars

$25,000

$30,000

$35,000

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES Infrastructure Measures Total University Expenditures Total Expenditures per FTE Tuition & Fees Tuition & Fee Revenue per FTE State Appropriations State Appropriations per FTE Annual Giving Endowment Endowment per FTE

USFSystem System&&Florida FloridaResearch ResearchUniversities University Peers USF Out-of-State Average Graduate Tuition & Out-of-State Graduate Tuition & Fees,Fees, 2001 2001/02 - 2008 - 2008/09

$28,000

UCF Miami

$26,000 $24,000 $22,000

FSU Mean

$20,000

UF FIU

USF

$18,000 FAU

$16,000 $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 2001

2002

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF System & Public AAU Institutions Out-of-State Graduate TuitionTuition & Fees,& 2001 2008 - 2008/09 Out-of-State Average Graduate Fees,- 2001/02

$35,000

AAU High

$30,000 $25,000

Public AAU 75% Mean

USF

$20,000

Public AAU 25%

$15,000 AAU Low

$10,000 $5,000 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

System & AAU Prospects USFUSF System & AAU Prospects Out-of-State Graduate TuitionTuition & Fees, 2001 -2001/02 2008 - 2008/09 Out-of-State Average Graduate & Fees,

$25,000

Illinois, Chicago Cincinnati Georgia

$23,000

USF

$21,000 $17,000

ASU Mean Colorado State NC State VATech

$15,000

Utah

$19,000

$13,000 $11,000

UAB

$9,000 $7,000 $5,000 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

TOTAL REVENUES PER STUDENT FTE

Definition:

This measure reflects the total revenues and other additions to net assets as reported in the IPEDS Finance component per total student FTE as reported in the IPEDS fall enrollment survey. Financial figures reported by fiscal year (FY).

Source: IPEDS

Type: IPEDS

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF System & Public AAU Institutions Total Revenues per FTE, FY2008 Total Revenues per Student FTE, FY 2008 Michigan UCLA Virginia UC San Diego UC Davis UNC Chapel Hill Washington Iowa Penn State Stony Brook Ohio State UC Irvine Minnesota Missouri Pittsburgh UC Berkeley Georgia Tech Wisconsin-Madison Rutgers UT Austin Maryland, College Park Illinois, Urb-Ch Florida Arizona UC Santa Barbara Michigan State Texas A&M Purdue Nebraska Kansas Iowa State Buffalo Colorado Indiana USF Oregon

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

$30,783 $0

$20,000

$40,000

$60,000

$80,000

Total Revenues per Student FTE

$100,000

$120,000

$140,000

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

$140,000

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

$120,000

Infrastructure Measures

$100,000

Total University Expenditures Total Expenditures per FTE Tuition & Fees Tuition & Fee Revenue per FTE State Appropriations State Appropriations per FTE Annual Giving Endowment Endowment per FTE

USF System & Florida USF SystemResearch & Florida University Research Peers Universities Total Revenues Student FTE, FY 2002 - FY 2008 Total Revenues perper FTE, FY2002 - FY2008 Miami

$80,000 $60,000

Mean UF

$40,000

USF

FSU FAU FIU UCF

$20,000 $0 2002

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF System & Public AAU Institutions TotalRevenues Revenuesper perFTE, Student FTE,- FY 2002 - FY 2008 Total FY2002 FY2008

$160,000 $140,000

AAU High

$120,000 $100,000 $80,000

Public AAU 75%

$60,000

Mean

$40,000

Public AAU 25%

USF

AAU Low

$20,000 $0 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USFUSF System & AAU Prospects System & AAU Prospects Total Revenues per Student FTE, FY 2002 - FY 2008 - FY2008 Tuition & Fee Revenues per Total Student FTE, FY2002

2003

$180,000

UAB

$160,000 $140,000 $120,000

Utah

$100,000 $80,000

Illinois, Chicago

$60,000

Mean NC State Georgia Cincinnati VA Tech

$40,000

USF

$20,000

Colorado State ASU

$0 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

STATE APPROPRIATIONS

PUBLIC AAUs

Definition:

Source:

This measure reflects amounts received by the institution through acts of a state legislative body, except grants and contracts and capital appropriations. Funds reported in this category are for meeting current operation expenses, not for specific projects or programs; as reported in the IPEDS Finance Component.

IPEDS

Type: IPEDS

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF System & Public AAU Institutions State Appropriations, FY2008 State Appropriations, FY 2008 UCLA Florida Minnesota UNC Chapel Hill UC Berkeley Rutgers Buffalo UC Davis Texas A&M Stony Brook Arizona Ohio State Maryland, College Park Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State

AAU PROSPECTS

$368,554,534 9

USF

Arizona State University Colorado State University North Carolina State University University of Alabama, Birmingham University of Cincinnati University of Georgia University of Illinois, Chicago University of Utah Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Michigan Washington Iowa UT Austin UC San Diego Purdue Illinois, Urb-Ch

NATIONAL PEERS

Iowa State

Georgia Tech Kansas UC Irvine Missouri Nebraska

USF System State Appropriations

Indiana UC Santa Barbara

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

FY 2009: $297,233,541

Virginia Oregon $0

$200

$400

$600

State Appropriations in Millions Note: Penn State, Colorado, and Pittsburgh data not available for FY2008

$800

Millions

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

$800,000,000 $700,000,000

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES Total University Expenditures Total Expenditures per FTE Tuition & Fees Tuition & Fee Revenue per FTE State Appropriations State Appropriations per FTE Annual Giving Endowment Endowment per FTE

$500,000,000 FSU

$400,000,000

USF

Mean UCF FIU FAU

$300,000,000 $200,000,000 $100,000,000

Student Measures

Miami

$0 2002

2005

2006

2007

2008

USFSystem System && Public Public AAU AAUInstitutions Institutions USF State 2008 StateAppropriations, Appropriations, FY FY2002 2002--FY FY2008

AAU High

$600,000,000 $500,000,000

Public AAU 75%

$400,000,000

USF

Mean

$300,000,000

Public AAU 25%

$200,000,000 $100,000,000

AAU Low

$0 2002

Research Measures

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2004

$700,000,000

Faculty Measures

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

USF&System & AAU Prospects USF System AAU Prospects State Appropriations, 2002 - FY 2008 State Appropriations, FY 2002 FY - FY2008

$500,000,000

2008

NC State Georgia Arizona State

$450,000,000 $400,000,000

USF

UAB

$350,000,000 Dollars in Millions

2003

$800,000,000

Dollars in Millions

$600,000,000 Dollars in Millions

Infrastructure Measures

USF System Florida&Research UniversityUniversities Peers USF&System Florida Research State Appropriations, FY2002 FY2008 State Appropriations, FY- 2002 - FY 2008

Mean Utah VA Tech Illinois, Chicago

$300,000,000 $250,000,000 $200,000,000

Cincinnati

$150,000,000 $100,000,000 $50,000,000

Colorado State

$0 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

STATE APPROPRIATIONS PER STUDENT FTE

Definition:

This measure reflects amonts received by the institution through acts of a state legislative body, except grants and contracts and capital appropriations per total student FTE. Funds reported in this category are for meeting current operation expenses, not for specific projects or programs; as reported in the IPEDS Finance Component.

Source: IPEDS

Type: IPEDS

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF System & Public AAUper Institutions State Appropriations FTE, FY2008 State Appropriations per Student FTE, FY 2008 Stony Brook UNC Chapel Hill Buffalo UCLA UC Davis Minnesota UC Berkeley Georgia Tech Rutgers Florida Iowa Arizona Maryland, College Park UC San Diego Iowa State

AAU PROSPECTS

Nebraska

Texas A&M Kansas

$10,202

USF Wisconsin-Madison UC Santa Barbara UC Irvine Washington

NATIONAL PEERS

Ohio State

Michigan Michigan State Missouri Purdue

USF System State Appropriations per Student FTE

Virginia Illinois, Urb-Ch UT Austin

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

FY 2009: $9,217

Indiana Oregon $0

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

State Appropriations per Student FTE in Dollars

Note: Penn State, Colorado, and Pittsburgh data not available for FY2008

$20,000

$25,000

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF System Florida&Research UniversityUniversities Peers USF&System Florida Research StateAppropriations Appropriationsper perFTE, Student FTE,- FY2008 FY 2002 - FY 2008 State FY2002

$16,000 $14,000

$12,000

FSU

USF

$10,000

FAU Mean FIU

$8,000

UCF

$6,000 $4,000 $2,000

Miami

$0 2002

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF System & Public AAU Institutions State FTE, FY- 2002 - FY 2008 StateAppropriations Appropriationsper perStudent FTE, FY 2002 FY2008

$25,000

AAU High

$20,000 $15,000

Public AAU 75%

$10,000

Mean USF Public AAU 25%

$5,000

AAU Low

$0 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

System & AAU Prospects USF USF System & AAU Prospects State Appropriations Appropriations per per FTE, Student FTE, -FY 2002 - FY 2008 State FY2002 FY2008

$30,000

UAB

$25,000 $20,000 NC State Georgia Utah Mean Illinois, Chicago

$15,000

USF

$10,000

VA State ASU Cincinnati

$5,000

Colorado State

$0 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

ANNUAL GIVING

PUBLIC AAUs

Definition:

Source:

These data are collected by the Top American Research Universities (TARU) as reported by institutions TARU on the Council for Aid to Educationâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Voluntary Support of Education (VSE) Survey. Figures reported Type: by fiscal year (FY). These data include all contributions actually received during the institutionâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s fiscal AAU, NSF year in the form of cash, securities, company products, and other property from alumni, non-alumni individuals, corporations, foundations, religious organizations, and other groups. Not included are public funds, earnings on investments held by the institution, and unfulfilled pledges. USF System includes all member institutions (USF, USF St. Petersburg, USF Sarasota-Manatee, USF Polytechnic). USF refers to the campus located in Tampa which includes USF Health and the College of Marine Science.

USF System & Public AAU Institutions Giving, FY2008 USF SystemAnnual & Public AAU Institutions Annual Giving, FY 2008

UCLA Wisconsin-Madison Michigan Washington Minnesota UNC Chapel Hill UC Berkeley UT Austin Virginia Ohio State Florida Texas A&M Indiana Purdue Arizona Penn State Illinois, Urb-Ch Michigan State Pittsburgh Iowa Maryland, College Park UC San Diego Georgia Tech Missouri Colorado UC Davis Kansas UC Irvine UC Santa Barbara Oregon Rutgers Nebraska Iowa State USF Buffalo Stony Brook

USF System Annual Giving FY 2009: $34 million FY 2010: $36.4 million

$44,683

$100,000

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

$200,000

$300,000

Dollars in Thousands

$400,000

$500,000

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

Thousands

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

$250,000,000

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

$200,000,000

USF System & Florida Research Universities USF System & Florida Research Universities Annual Giving, FY2000 - FY2008 Annual Giving, FY 2000 - FY 2008

UF Miami

$150,000,000 $100,000,000

Mean FSU

USF

$50,000,000

UCF FIU FAU

$0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

$700,000,000 $600,000,000 $500,000,000

AAU High

$400,000,000 $300,000,000

Public AAU 75%

$200,000,000

AAU Mean

$100,000,000

Public AAU 25%

USF

AAU Low

$0 2000

2008

USF System Public &AAU Institutions USF &System Public AAU Institutions Annual Giving, - FY2008 Annual FY2000 Giving, FY 2000 - FY 2008

2007

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF SystemUSF & AAU Prospects System & AAU Prospects Annual Giving, FY 2000 - FY 2008 Annual Giving, FY2000 - FY2008

$250,000,000 $200,000,000

NC State Cincinnati

$150,000,000

ASU Utah Mean VA Tech UAB Georgia Illinois, Chicago

$100,000,000 $50,000,000

USF

Colorado State

$0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

ENDOWMENT

PUBLIC AAUs

Definition:

Source:

The market value of an institutionâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s endowment assets as of June 30 as reported to the National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO) Endowment Study and as reported by The Center in Top American Research Universities (TARU).

NACUBO

Type: TARU

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF System & Public AAU Institutions Endowment, FY 2008 Endowment, FY2008 Michigan UT Austin Texas A&M Virginia UC Berkeley Minnesota UNC Chapel Hill Pittsburgh UCLA Washington Wisconsin-Madison Ohio State Purdue Georgia Tech Michigan State Florida Penn State Illinois, Urb-Ch Kansas Iowa Indiana Nebraska UC Davis Rutgers Iowa State Buffalo Missouri UC San Diego Arizona Colorado Oregon Maryland, College Park USF UC Irvine UC Santa Barbara Stony Brook

NATIONAL PEERS

USF System Endowment

$360,035

FY 2009: $275,398,000 FY 2010: $296,000,000 (est.) $2,000

$4,000 Dollars in Thousands

$6,000

$8,000

Thousands

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES Infrastructure Measures Total University Expenditures Total Expenditures per FTE Tuition & Fees Tuition & Fee Revenue per FTE State Appropriations State Appropriations per FTE Annual Giving Endowment Endowment per FTE

$1,000,000 $800,000

Miami

$600,000

FSU Mean

$400,000

USF

$200,000

UCF FIU FAU

$0 2000

2003

2004

2005

2006

$7,000,000

2007

2008

AAU High

$6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 Public AAU 75%

$2,000,000

Mean Public AAU 25%

$1,000,000

USF

AAU Low

$0 2000

Research Measures

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2002

USF System Public &AAU Institutions USF &System Public AAU Institutions Endowment, FY2000 FY - FY2008 Endowment, 2000 - FY 2008

$8,000,000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

& AAU Prospects USF System &USF AAUSystem Prospects FY 2000 - FY 2008 Endowment, Endowment, FY2000 - FY2008

$1,400,000 $1,200,000

Cincinnati

$1,000,000 Dollars in Thousands

2001

Note: FIU data not available for FY 2000, not included in mean for FY 2008. FAU data not available for FY 2008, not included in mean for FY 2008.

Dollars in Thousands

Faculty Measures

$1,200,000

USF System Florida & Research UniversityUniversities Peers USF&System Florida Research Endowment, FY2000FY- FY2008 Endowment, 2000 - FY 2008

$1,400,000

Dollars in Thousands

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

$800,000

Georgia Utah NC State VATech Mean ASU

$600,000 $400,000

USF

UAB Illinois, Chicago Colorado State

$200,000 $0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

ENDOWMENT PER TOTAL STUDENT FTE

Definition:

A ratio of the total student FTE of an institution (as reported to the IPEDS fall enrollment survey) and the market value of an institutionâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s endowment assets as of June 30 (as reported to the National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO) Endowment Study).

Source:

IPEDS, NACUBO

Type: USF

USF System & PublicUniversities AAU Institutions USF System & Florida Research Endowment per Total FY 2008 Endowment perStudent Total FTE, Student FTE, FY2008 Virginia Michigan UT Austin Texas A&M Pittsburgh UNC Chapel Hill Georgia Tech UC Berkeley Minnesota Washington UCLA Wisconsin-Madison Purdue Ohio State Nebraska Iowa Kansas Michigan State Penn State Florida Illinois, Urb-Ch Indiana Oregon Iowa State UC Davis Buffalo UC San Diego Missouri Rutgers Colorado Arizona Maryland, College Park USF UC Irvine UC Santa Barbara Stony Brook

NATIONAL PEERS

USF System Endowment per Student FTE $10

FY 2009: $9,000 FY 2010: $9,000 (est.)

$50

$100

$150

Dollars in Dollars in Thousands Thousands

$200

$250

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF System & Florida Research University Peers USF System & Florida Research Institutions

$60

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

$50

Dollars in Thousands

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

Student Measures

Miami

$40 $30

$20

Mean FSU

$10

USF UCF & FIU FAU

$0 2002

2005

2006

2007

2008

AAU High

$200

$150 $100 Public AAU 75% Mean

$50

Public AAU 25%

USF

AAU Low

$0 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF USFSystem System && AAU AAUProspects Prospects

Research Measures

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2004

USF USF System System && Public Public AAU AAU Institutions Institutions Endowment per Total Student FTE, FY FY2002 2002 -- FY2008 FY 2008

$250

Faculty Measures

Endowmentper per Total Total Student 2002 - FY 2008 Endowment StudentFTE, FTE,FYFY2002 - FY2008

$50 $45

Cincinnati

$40 Dollars in Thousands

2003

Note: FIU data not available for FY 2000, not included in mean for FY 2008. FAU data not available for FY 2008, not included in mean for FY 2008.

Dollars in Thousands

Endowment Total StudentFTE, FTE,FY2002 FY 2002--FY2008 FY 2008 Endowment perper Total Student

$35 $30

UAB Utah

$25

Georgia Mean NC State VA Tech

$20 $15

USF

$10

ASU Illinois, Chicago Colorado State

$5 $0 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

STUDENTS

Strategic Performance Performance Metrics Metrics Strategic

Faculty Faculty Tenured // Tenure Tenure Track Track Faculty Faculty •• Tenured • Full-Time Instructional Staff • Full-Time Instructional Staff • Faculty Awards Awards * * • Faculty • National Academy Members * * • National Academy Members • Citation Impact * • Citation Impact * Total Research Research Expenditures Expenditures per per Tenured Tenured // Tenure Tenure •• Total Track Faculty Faculty Track • Full Professors Average Salary Salary • Full Professors Average • Associate Professors Average Salary • Associate Professors Average Salary • Assistant Professors Average Salary • Assistant Professors Average Salary

Infrastructure Infrastructure Total University University Expenditures Expenditures •• Total • Total Expenditures per Student Student FTE FTE • Total Expenditures per Tuition & & Fees Fees •• Tuition • Tuition & Fee Revenues Revenues per per Total Total Student Student FTE FTE • Tuition & Fee • State Appropriations • State Appropriations State Appropriations Appropriations per per Student Student FTE FTE •• State Annual Giving Giving •• Annual • Endowment • Endowment Endowment per per Total Total Student Student FTE FTE •• Endowment

Students Students Total Student Student Headcount Headcount •• Total • Total Student FTE • Total Student FTE Graduate Student Student Headcount Headcount •• Graduate • Percent Graduate Student Headcount • Percent Graduate Student Headcount • Doctorates Awarded ** • Doctorates Awarded ** First Time Time in in College College (FTIC) (FTIC) Student Student Enrollment Enrollment •• First Median SAT SAT Score Score * * •• Median • FTICs in Top 10% of High School School Class Class • FTICs in Top 10% of High • National Merit Scholars • National Merit Scholars Percent Undergraduates Undergraduates Receiving Receiving Pell Pell Grant Grant Aid Aid •• Percent Percent of of Classes Classes with with Fewer Fewer than than 20 20 Students Students •• Percent • Percent of Classes with 50 or More Students • Percent of Classes with 50 or More Students Freshman Retention Retention Rates Rates •• Freshman • Six Year Graduation Rate for First First Time Time in in College College • Six Year Graduation Rate for (FTIC) Students Students (FTIC) • International Student Headcount Headcount • International Student • Percent International Student Headcount • Percent International Student Headcount • Students Studying Abroad • Students Studying Abroad • Percent Students Students Studying Studying Abroad Abroad • Percent • Student-to-Faculty Ratio • Student-to-Faculty Ratio

Research Research NSF Total Total Research Research Expenditures Expenditures •• NSF • AAU Federal Research Expenditures * * • AAU Federal Research Expenditures NSF Non-Federal Non-Federal Research Research Expenditures Expenditures •• NSF • Research Performance Index (RPI) • Research Performance Index (RPI) • Postdoctoral Appointees ** • Postdoctoral Appointees ** • Non-Faculty Researchers Researchers with with Doctorates Doctorates • Non-Faculty Invention Disclosures Disclosures Received Received •• Invention • Total Patents Issued • Total Patents Issued Total Licenses Licenses // Options Options Executed Executed •• Total • Cumulative Active Licenses • Cumulative Active Licenses License Income Income Received Received •• License • Startups Initiated • Startups Initiated

* AAU AAU Indicator Indicator –– Phase Phase II * ** AAU AAU Indicator Indicator –– Phase Phase II II **

15 15

TOTAL STUDENT HEADCOUNT

Definition:

Source:

This variable reflects the total men and women enrolled for credit in the fall of the academic year. IPEDS Type: USF

USF & Public AAU Institutions USF & Public AAU Institutions Total Student Headcount Fall 2009 Total Student Headcount, Fall ,2009 Ohio State Minnesota UT Austin Florida Texas A&M Michigan State Washington Penn State Illinois, Urb-Ch Indiana Michigan Wisconsin-Madison Purdue USF Arizona UCLA Rutgers Maryland, College Park UC Berkeley Colorado UC Davis Missouri Kansas Iowa UNC Chapel Hill Buffalo UC San Diego Pittsburgh Iowa State UC Irvine Stony Brook Virginia Nebraska UC Santa Barbara Oregon Georgia Tech

40,022

USF Total Student Headcount

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

Fall 2010: 40,433 (drop/add benchmark)

10,000

20,000

30,000

Total Student Headcount

Note: In fall 2009, the USF System began reporting separately to IPEDS; thus, fall 2009 is USF only.

40,000

50,000

60,000

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

60,000

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

50,000

USF System Florida &Research Universities USF&System Florida Research Universities TotalHeadcount Student Headcount (Fall), 2000 - 2008 Total Student (Fall), 2000 - 2008 UF UCF

USF

FIU FSU Mean

40,000 30,000

FAU

20,000 Miami

10,000 2000

2001

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF System & Public AAU Institutions Total Student Headcount (Fall),(Fall), 2000 -2000 2008- 2008 Total Student Headcount

60,000

AAU High

50,000 USF Public AAU 75%

40,000

Mean

30,000

Public AAU 25%

20,000

AAU Low

10,000 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System & AAU Prospects USF System & AAU Prospects Total Student Headcount (Fall), 2000 - 2008 Total Student Headcount (Fall), 2000 - 2008

70,000

ASU

60,000 50,000

USF

40,000

Georgia NC State Mean VA Tech Cincinnati Colorado State Utah Illinois, Chicago

30,000 20,000

UAB

10,000 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

TOTAL STUDENT FTE

PUBLIC AAUs

Definition:

This variable is derived from the enrollment by race/ethnicity section of the fall enrollment survey. The full-time equivalent of the institutionâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s part-time enrollment is estimated and then added to the full-time enrollment of the institution. This formula has been used to produce the full-time equivalent enrollment that is published annually in the Digest of Education Statistics. The full-time equivalent of part-time enrollment is estimated by multiplying the part-time enrollment by factors that vary by control and level of institution and level of student. It is important to note that while the federally-defined FTE calculation is used below for all institutions listed, there are instances in other reports where a formula for calculating student FTE, as defined by the state of Florida is used, resulting in a different FTE for Florida institutions.

Source: IPEDS

Type: USF

USF System includes all member institutions (USF, USF St. Petersburg, USF Sarasota-Manatee, USF Polytechnic). USF refers to the campus located in Tampa which includes HealthAAU and the College of Marine Science. USFUSF & Public Institutions

Total Student FTE, Fall 2009 USF & Public AAU Institutions Total Student FTE (Fall Enrollment), 2009

Ohio State UT Austin Florida Texas A&M Penn State Michigan State Minnesota Washington Illinois, Urb-Ch Michigan Indiana Wisconsin-Madison Purdue UCLA Arizona UC Berkeley Rutgers Maryland, College Park USF UC Davis Colorado Missouri UC San Diego UC Irvine Kansas Iowa Iowa State UNC Chapel Hill Buffalo Pittsburgh UC Santa Barbara Virginia Nebraska Stony Brook Oregon Georgia Tech

32,248

USF Total Student FTE

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

Fall 2010: 32,531 (est.)

10,000

20,000

30,000

Total Student FTE

Note: In fall 2009, the USF System began reporting separately to IPEDS; thus, fall 2009 is USF only.

40,000

50,000

60,000

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

50,000

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

40,000

USF System & Florida Research Universities USF System & Florida Research Universities Total Student FTE (Fall Enrollment), 2002 - 2008 Total Student FTE (Fall Enrollment), 2002 - 2008 UF UCF

USF

30,000

FSU Mean FIU

20,000

FAU Miami

10,000

0 2002

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USFUSF System & Public AAU Institutions System & Public AAU Institutions Total Student FTEFTE (Fall(Fall Enrollment), 2002 - 2008 Total Student Enrollment), 2002 - 2008

60,000 50,000

AAU High

40,000

Public AAU 75%

USF

Mean

30,000

Public AAU 25%

20,000

AAU Low

10,000 0 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USFUSF System & AAU Prospects System & AAU Prospects Student Enrollment), - 2008 TotalTotal Student FTEFTE (Fall(Fall Enrollment), 20022002 - 2008

60,000

ASU

50,000 40,000 USF Georgia

30,000 20,000

UAB

10,000 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

GRADUATE STUDENT HEADCOUNT

Definition:

Source:

This variable reflects the headcount at the fall of an academic year of graduate students, defined as a student who holds a bachelorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s or first-professional dgeree (or equivalent), and is taking courses at the post-baccalaureate level; reported in the IPEDS Fall Enrollment Survey

IPEDS

Type: USF

USF & Public AAU Institutions USF & Public AAU Institutions Graduate Student Headcount , Fall 2009 Graduate Student Headcount, Fall 2009 Minnesota Florida Michigan Ohio State Washington UT Austin Illinois, Urb-Ch UCLA Wisconsin-Madison UNC Chapel Hill Michigan State Maryland, College Park UC Berkeley Pittsburgh Texas A&M Indiana Buffalo USF Virginia Purdue Arizona Iowa Stony Brook Rutgers Kansas Missouri Georgia Tech UC Davis Penn State Colorado Iowa State UC San Diego Nebraska UC Irvine Oregon UC Santa Barbara

9,486

NATIONAL PEERS

USF Graduate Student Headcount Fall 2010: 9,466 (drop/add benchmark)

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000

Total Graduate Student Headcount

Note: In fall 2009, the USF System began reporting separately to IPEDS; thus, fall 2009 is USF only.

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

USF System & Florida Research Universities USF System & Florida Research Universities Graduate StudentStudent Headcount (Fall), 2000 2008 - 2008 Graduate Headcount (Fall),- 2000

14,000

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

12,000

Infrastructure Measures

10,000

USF

8,000

FSU Mean UCF FIU

Total University Expenditures Total Expenditures per FTE Tuition & Fees Tuition & Fee Revenue per FTE State Appropriations State Appropriations per FTE Annual Giving Endowment Endowment per FTE

6,000

Miami FAU

4,000 2,000 0 2000

2001

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF System & Public AAU Institutions Graduate Student Headcount (Fall), 2000 - 2008 Graduate Student Headcount (Fall), 2000 - 2008

16,000

AAU High

14,000 12,000

Public AAU 75%

10,000

USF

Mean

8,000

Public AAU 25%

6,000 4,000

AAU Low

2,000 0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

System & AAU Prospects USF USF System & AAU Prospects Graduate Student Headcount (Fall), 20002000 - 2008 Graduate Student Headcount (Fall), - 2008

2002

14,000

ASU

12,000 10,000

USF Illinois, Chicago NC State Cincinnati Mean VA Tech Georgia Colorado State Utah

8,000 6,000

UAB

4,000 2,000 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

PERCENT GRADUATE STUDENT HEADCOUNT

Definition:

This variable reflects percent of graduate students of the total student enrollment (headcount); based on fall enrollment data reported on the IPEDS Enrollment Survey.

Source: IPEDS

Type: USF

USF & Public AAU Institutions USF & Public AAU Institutions % Graduate Student Headcount, Fall 2009 Percent Graduate Student Headcount, Fall 2009 UNC Chapel Hill Michigan Virginia Pittsburgh Minnesota Florida Stony Brook Georgia Tech Buffalo UCLA Iowa Washington UC Berkeley Maryland, College Park Illinois, Urb-Ch Wisconsin-Madison Kansas UT Austin Ohio State Missouri USF Indiana Michigan State Rutgers Arizona Nebraska UC Davis Purdue Texas A&M Iowa State UC San Diego UC Irvine Colorado Oregon Penn State UC Santa Barbara

24%

NATIONAL PEERS

USF Percent Graduate Student Headcount

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

Fall 2010: 23% (drop/add benchmark)

10%

15%

20%

25%

Note: In fall 2009, the USF System began reporting separately to IPEDS; thus, fall 2009 is USF only.

30%

35%

40%

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

USF System & Florida Research Universities USF System & Florida Research Universities Percent Graduate Student Headcount (Fall), 2000 - 2008 % Graduate Student Headcount (Fall), 2000 - 2008

35%

Miami

30%

25%

20%

FSU FAU FIU

USF & Mean

15%

UCF

10% 2000

2001

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System && Public USF System PublicAAU AAUInstitutions Institutions % Graduate Student Headcount (Fall),(Fall), 20002000 - 2008- 2008 Percent Graduate Student Headcount

40%

AAU High

35% 30%

Public AAU 75%

25%

Mean

USF

20%

Public AAU 25%

15%

AAU Low

10% 5% 0% 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System & AAU&Prospects USF System AAU Prospects Percent Graduate Student Headcount (Fall), 2000 - 2008 % Graduate Student Headcount (Fall), 2000 - 2008

2002

35%

Illinois, Chicago UAB

30%

Cincinnati Mean NC State VA Tech Colorado State

25%

USF

Georgia Utah ASU

20% 15% 10% 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

DOCTORATES AWARDED

PUBLIC AAUs

AAU Phase I Indicator Definition:

This data element reflects the actual unduplicated number of degrees awarded at the doctoral level.

Source:

IPEDS Completion Survey

Type:

AAU, NSF, TARU USF System includes all member institutions (USF, USF St. Petersburg, USF Sarasota-Manatee, USF Polytechnic). USF refers to the campus located in Tampa which includes USF Health and the College of Marine Science.

USF & Public AAU Institutions Doctorates 2008 - 2009 USF & PublicAwarded, AAU Institutions Doctorates Awarded, 2008-09 UC Berkeley UT Austin Florida Minnesota Wisconsin-Madison Illinois, Urb-Ch Ohio State Michigan UCLA Maryland, College Park Washington Penn State Purdue UNC Chapel Hill Texas A&M UC Davis UC San Diego Georgia Tech Pittsburgh Arizona Michigan State Rutgers Indiana Iowa Stony Brook Virginia Buffalo UC Irvine UC Santa Barbara Missouri Colorado Kansas Iowa State USF Nebraska Oregon

USF Doctorates Awarded 256

200

2009-2010: 288

400

600

Total Doctorates Awarded

800

1000

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES Infrastructure Measures

900

700 600

Student Measures

100

800

Total University Expenditures Total Expenditures per FTE Tuition & Fees Tuition & Fee Revenue per FTE State Appropriations State Appropriations per FTE Annual Giving Endowment Endowment per FTE

USF && Florida University Peers USF Florida Research Research Universities Doctorates Awarded, 2000 - 2008 Doctorates Awarded, 2000 - 2008

500 400

FSU

300

Mean

200

UCF Miami FIU FAU

USF

0 2000

2001

2002

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF & Public AAU Institutions USF & Public AAU Institutions Doctorates Awarded, 2000 - 2008 Doctorates Awarded, 2000 - 2008

1000 900

AAU High

800 700

Public AAU 75%

600 AAU Mean

500 400

Public AAU 25%

300

USF

200

AAU Low

100 0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF & AAU Prospects USF & AAU Prospects Doctorates Awarded, 2000 - 2008 Doctorates Awarded, 2000 - 2008

450

ASU

400

Utah Georgia

350 300

VA Tech NC State Cincinnati Mean Illinois, Chicago

250

USF

200

Colorado State UAB

150 100 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

FIRST TIME IN COLLEGE (FTIC) STUDENT ENROLLMENT Definition:

This variable reflects the number of first-time in college (FTIC) students enrolled for credit in the fall of the academic year.

Source: IPEDS

Type: USF

USF SystemAAU & Public AAU Institutions USF & Public Institutions FTIC Student Enrollment, Fall 2009 First-Time-In-College (FTIC) Student Enrollment, Fall 2009 Texas A&M Indiana Michigan State UT Austin Illinois, Urb-Ch Arizona Ohio State Penn State Florida Purdue Washington Michigan Rutgers Wisconsin-Madison Colorado Missouri Minnesota UC Santa Barbara UCLA UC Berkeley UC Davis Iowa State Maryland, College Park UC Irvine Iowa Nebraska UNC Chapel Hill Kansas Oregon UC San Diego USF Pittsburgh Buffalo Virginia Stony Brook Georgia Tech

NATIONAL PEERS

USF FTIC Student Enrollment

3,738

Fall 2010: 4,604 (drop/add benchmark)

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

FTIC Student Enrollment

Note: In fall 2009, the USF System began reporting separately to IPEDS; thus, fall 2009 is USF only.

6,000

7,000

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

8,000

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF System Florida&Research Universities USF&System Florida Research Universities FTIC Student Enrollment 2000 - 2008 (Fall), 2000 - 2008 First-Time-In-College (FTIC)(Fall), Student Enrollment

8,000 7,000 6,000

UF UCF

5,000

FSU

4,000

Mean

USF

3,000

FIU FAU

2,000

Miami

1,000 0 2000

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System & Public AAU AAU Institutions USF System & Public Institutions First-Time-In-College (FTIC) Student (Fall), 2000 - 2008 FTIC Student Enrollment (Fall),Enrollment 2000 - 2008

9,000 8,000

AAU High

7,000 6,000

Public AAU 75%

5,000

Mean

4,000

Public AAU 25%

USF

3,000

AAU Low

2,000 1,000 0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System & AAU Prospects USF System & AAU Prospects First-Time-In-College (FTIC) Student Enrollment FTIC Student Enrollment (Fall), 2000 - 2008 (Fall), 2000 - 2008

2001

9,000

ASU

8,000 7,000 6,000

VA Tech Georgia NC State Colorado State

5,000

USF

4,000

Mean Cincinnati Illinois, Chicago

3,000

Utah

2,000

UAB

1,000 0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

MEDIAN SAT SCORE

PUBLIC AAUs

Definition:

Source:

This variable reflects the median SAT score. For institutions that only accept the ACT and not the Education Trust, College Results Online SAT, the estimated median ACT score is converted to an SAT equivalent using a concordance table. Type: USF USF System includes all member institutions (USF, USF St. Petersburg, USF Sarasota-Manatee, USF Polytechnic). USF refers to the campus located in Tampa which includes USF Health and the College of Marine Science.

System & Public Institutions USF USF System & Public AAU AAU Institutions Median SAT SAT Scores, 20082008 Median Scores, Georgia Tech UC Berkeley Virginia Michigan UNC Chapel Hill UCLA Illinois, Urb-Ch Maryland, College Park Wisconsin-Madison Florida UC San Diego Pittsburgh UT Austin Ohio State Minnesota Washington Texas A&M UC Irvine Rutgers Stony Brook Penn State UC Santa Barbara Missouri Colorado UC Davis Buffalo Nebraska Iowa Purdue Michigan State Indiana USF Kansas Iowa State Oregon Arizona

1240-1420 * 1200-1460 1220-1440 1220-1430 1210-1400 1160-1410 1180-1410 1170-1380 1160-1380 1160-1380 1130-1360 1150-1340 1100-1350 1130-1330 1110-1380 1070-1320

AAU PROSPECTS

1100-1350

1060-1280 1070-1300 1090-1270 1090-1300 1070-1300 1080-1310 1070-1280 1030-1290

NATIONAL PEERS

1040-1260 1040-1340 1070-1340

USF Median SAT Score

1030-1270 1020-1280 1040-1260 1080-1230

1150

1030-1210

Fall 2009: 1100-1280 Fall 2010: 1090-1260 (est.)

1040-1320 970-1210 980-1220

700

800

900

1000

1100

Median SAT Score * data represents interquartile scores

1200

1300

1400

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF System Florida &Research Universities USF&System Florida Research Universities Median SAT2002 Scores, 2002 - 2008 Median SAT Scores, - 2008

1,300

Miami

1,250

1,200

FSU Mean & UCF

1,150

USF

1,100

FIU

1,050

FAU

1,000 2002

2003

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF &System Public AAU Institutions USF System Public &AAU Institutions Median SAT Scores, 2002 - 2008 Median SAT Scores, 2002 - 2008

1,400 1,350

AAU High

1,300 1,250

Public AAU 75%

1,200

Mean

1,150

Public AAU 25%

1,100

AAU Low

USF

1,050 1,000 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF USFSystem System&&AAU AAUProspects Prospects

Median SATScores, Scores,2002 2002 -- 2008 2008 Median SAT

1,250 1,200

VA Tech NC State

1,150

USF

Mean Utah, Cincinnati, Colorado State, UAB ASU Illinois, Chicago Georgia

1,100 1,050 1,000 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

FTICs IN TOP 10% OF HIGH SCHOOL CLASS

Definition:

The proportion of enrolled freshmen who graduated in the top ten percent of their high school classes as reported in the U.S. News & World Report rankings.

Source:

U.S. News & World Report

Type: USF

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF & Public AAU Institutions FTIC's in Top 10% of High School Class, Fall 2009 FTICs in Top 10% of High School Class, 2009 UC San Diego UC Davis UC Berkeley UCLA UC Santa Barbara UC Irvine Virginia Washington Georgia Tech Iowa UNC Chapel Hill Florida UT Austin Maryland, College Park Illinois, Urb-Ch Wisconsin-Madison Texas A&M Penn State Ohio State Pittsburgh Minnesota Rutgers Stony Brook Purdue USF Arizona Indiana Michigan Michigan State Iowa State Buffalo Oregon Kansas Nebraska Missouri Colorado

NATIONAL PEERS

35%

USF FTICs in Top 10% of High School Class Fall 2010: 32%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF USF System & Florida Research Universities System & Florida Research Universities FTIC's in Top 10% of High School Class, 20012001 - 2009 FTICs in Top 10% of High School Class, - 2009

90% 80%

70% Miami

60% 50%

Mean

40%

USF & UCF

FSU

30% 20% 10%

FAU

FIU

2001

2002

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

USF USFSystem System&&Public Public AAU AAU Institutions Institutions FTIC's FTICsininTop Top10% 10% ofof High High School School Class, Class, 2001 2001 -- 2009 2009

120% 100%

AAU High Public AAU 75%

80% 60%

Mean

40%

USF

Public AAU 25% AAU Low

20% 0% 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USFSystem System && AAU AAU Prospects Prospects USF FTICs in Top 10% High School Class, 20012001 - 2009 FTIC's in Top 10% of of High School Class (Fall), - 2009

2003

55%

2009

Georgia

50% 45%

VA Tech

40%

NC State

USF

35%

Mean ASU Illinois, Chicago UAB

30% 25%

Utah Cincinnati & Colorado State

20% 15% 10% 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

NATIONAL MERIT SCHOLARS

Definition:

Source:

â&#x20AC;&#x153;The number of students receiving either the National Merit Scholarship or the National Achievement Scholarship as reported by The Center in Top American Research Universities (TARU). The Center indicated that it intends to track the number of students receiving the National Hispanic Scholars Program should those data become available.â&#x20AC;?

TARU

Type:

TARU, USF

USF System & Public AAU Institutions 2008 USF System & Public AAU Institutions Natonal Merit Scholars, 2001 - 2008 National Merit Scholars, 2008 UT Austin Florida Texas A&M UNC Chapel Hill Ohio State Georgia Tech Illinois, Urb-Ch UC Berkeley Minnesota Michigan Purdue Arizona Indiana Nebraska Michigan State Iowa State Kansas Washington Maryland, College Park UCLA Virginia Missouri Iowa Pittsburgh Wisconsin-Madison USF Rutgers Penn State Oregon UC San Diego Stony Brook UC Davis Colorado Buffalo UC Santa Barbara UC Irvine

NATIONAL PEERS

USF National Merit Scholars 2009: 24 2010: 21

100

150

Number of National Merit Scholars

200

250

300

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

300

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

250

USF&System Florida Research USF System Florida &Research UniversityUniversities Peers National Merit Scholars, 2001 - 2008 Natonal Merit Scholars, 2001 - 2008

200

150 100 Mean Miami

USF

FSU UCF, FAU, FIU

0 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System Public&AAU Institutions USF & System Public AAU Institutions Natonal National Merit Scholars, 2001 - 2008 Merit Scholars, 2001 - 2008

350 300

AAU High

250 200 150

100

Public AAU 75% Mean

USF

Public AAU 25% AAU Low

0 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System & AAU Prospects USF System & AAU Prospects National Merit2001 Scholars, Natonal Merit Scholars, - 20082001 - 2008

200

ASU

150

100 Georgia Cincinnati Mean

USF

VA Tech Utah Colorado State UAB NC State Illinois, Chicago

0 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

PERCENT UNDERGRADUATES RECEIVING PELL GRANT AID Definition:

This variable reflects percent of undergraduate students receiving Pell grant aid; based on data provided in the IPEDS Student Financial Aid component. The Pell Grant program is a federal program which provides grant assistance to eligible undergraduate postsecondary students with demonstrated financial need to help meet education expenses. This variable has recently been added to the IPEDS database, one year is currently available.

Source: IPEDS

Type: USF

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF System & Public AAU Institutions Percent Undergraduates Receiving Pell Grant Aid, % Undergraduates Receiving Pell2008-09 Grant Aid, 2008 - 2009 UC San Diego UCLA UC Davis UC Berkeley Stony Brook Buffalo USF UC Santa Barbara UC Irvine Florida Rutgers Arizona UT Austin Washington Oregon Michigan State Iowa State Ohio State Nebraska Minnesota Iowa Texas A&M Pittsburgh Missouri Illinois, Urb-Ch Purdue Penn State UNC Chapel Hill Maryland, College Park Kansas Indiana Wisconsin-Madison Michigan Colorado Georgia Tech Virginia

27%

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

*AAU member

USF System & Florida Research Universities USF System & Florida Research Universities Undergraduates PellAid, Grant Aid, 2008-09 % Percent Undergraduates ReceivingReceiving Pell Grant 2008 - 2009 FIU USF

27%

UF FAU Mean UCF FSU Miami 0%

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

USFSystem System&&Public PublicAAU AAUInstitutions Institutions USF % Undergraduates Receiving Pell Grant Aid,Aid, 20082008-09 - 2009 Percent Undergraduates Receiving Pell Grant AAU High USF

27%

Public AAU 75% Mean Public AAU 25% AAU Low 0%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

35%

40%

USF&System & AAU Prospects USF System AAU Prospects % Undergraduates Receiving 2008 - 2009 Percent Undergraduates Receiving Pell Pell GrantGrant Aid, Aid, 2008-09 Illinois, Chicago USF

27%

UAB ASU Mean Cincinnati Utah Colorado State NC State Georgia VA Tech 0%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

PERCENT OF CLASSES WITH FEWER THAN 20 STUDENTS Definition:

Source:

The proportion of undergraduate classes with fewer than twenty students as reported in the U.S. U.S. News & World Report News & World Report rankings. Type: USF USF System includes all member institutions (USF, USF St. Petersburg, USF Sarasota-Manatee, USF Polytechnic). USF refers to the campus located in Tampa which includes USF Health and the College of Marine Science.

System & Public AAU Institutions USF SystemUSF & Public AAU Institutions % of Classes withthan Fewer than 20 Students, Percent of Classes with Fewer 20 Students, 2008 2008 UC Berkeley UCLA Iowa Colorado UC Santa Barbara Virginia UC Irvine Missouri Michigan UNC Chapel Hill Wisconsin-Madison UC San Diego Pittsburgh Minnesota Florida Rutgers Kansas Georgia Tech Oregon Nebraska Purdue Indiana Illinois, Urb-Ch Arizona Stony Brook Washington UT Austin UC Davis Buffalo Ohio State Iowa State Maryland, College Park Penn State USF Michigan State Texas A&M

USF System Percent of Classes with Fewer than 20 Students

29%

10%

20%

30%

2009: 24%

40%

50%

60%

70%

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

55%

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

50%

Infrastructure Measures

45%

Total University Expenditures Total Expenditures per FTE Tuition & Fees Tuition & Fee Revenue per FTE State Appropriations State Appropriations per FTE Annual Giving Endowment Endowment per FTE

USF System & Florida Research University Peers USF System & Florida Research Universities %Percent of Classes with Fewer than 20 Students, 2001 2008- 2008 of Classes with Fewer than 20 Students,-2001

Miami

40%

35%

Mean & FAU FSU

30%

USF UCF & FIU

25% 20% 2001

2002

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USFSystem System&&Public PublicAAU AAUInstitutions Institutions USF Percent Classeswith withFewer Fewerthan than2020Students Students,2001 2001- 2008 - 2008 % ofofClasses

70%

AAU High

60% 50%

Public AAU 75% Mean

40%

Public AAU 25%

30%

USF AAU Low

20% 10% 0% 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System & Public Institutions USF System & AAUAAU Prospects Percent Classeswith withFewer Fewerthan than2020Students, Students,2001 2001- 2008 - 2008 % ofofClasses

55%

ASU

50%

Cincinnati

45%

Utah

40%

Mean, UAB, Georgia Illinois, Chicago & Colorado State

35%

NC State

30%

USF

25%

VA Tech

20% 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

PERCENT OF CLASSES WITH 50 OR MORE STUDENTS Definition:

The proportion of undergraduate classes with fifty or more students as reported in the U.S. News & World Report rankings.

Source:

U.S. News & World Report

Type: USF

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF System & Public AAU Institutions % of 50 orStudents, More Students, Percent of ClassesClasses with 50with or More 2008 2008 UC San Diego UC Davis UT Austin Texas A&M Buffalo Stony Brook Michigan State Georgia Tech Florida UCLA Rutgers Illinois, Urb-Ch Ohio State Wisconsin-Madison Michigan Washington UC Santa Barbara UC Irvine Purdue Penn State Iowa State Indiana Oregon Minnesota Pittsburgh USF Virginia Nebraska Missouri Maryland, College Park Colorado UC Berkeley UNC Chapel Hill Kansas Arizona Iowa

14%

USF System Percent of Classes with 50 or More Students 2009: 15%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

30%

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

25%

USF System & Florida Research University Peers USF System & Florida Research Universities % of Classes withwith 50 or Students, 20012001 - 2008 Percent of Classes 50More or More Students, - 2008 Miami

20%

UF & FIU

15%

Mean FSU

USF

FAU

10%

UCF

5% 0% 2001

2002

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF USFSystem System&&Public PublicAAU AAUInstitutions Institutions % of Classes with 50 More Students, 20012001 - 2008 Percent of Classes withor50 or More Students, - 2008

40% 35% 30%

AAU High

25% 20%

Public AAU 75% Mean

15%

USF & Public AAU 25%

10%

AAU Low

5% 0% 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System & AAU Prospects USF System & AAU Prospects Percent of Classes 50 or Students, More Students, % of Classes with 50with or More 2001 -2001 2008- 2008

25%

VA Tech

20%

Illinois, Chicago Utah Colorado State NC State Mean ASU

15%

USF

UAB Georgia

10%

Cincinnati

5% 0% 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

FRESHMAN RETENTION RATE

Definition:

This variable reflects the percent of the fall full-time cohort from the prior year that re-enrolled at the institution as either full- or part-time in the current year; as reported on the IPEDS Enrollment component. Data for 2003 are not consistent due to instiutitons completing this item voluntarily for all institutions.

Source: IPEDS

Type: USF

USF USF&&Public PublicAAU AAUInstitutions Institutions FreshmanRetention Retention Rate,2009 Fall 2009 Rate, Virginia UCLA UNC Chapel Hill Michigan Florida UC Berkeley UC San Diego Wisconsin-Madison UC Irvine Washington Pittsburgh Maryland, College Park Illinois, Urb-Ch Texas A&M Penn State Georgia Tech UT Austin UC Davis Ohio State UC Santa Barbara Rutgers Michigan State Minnesota Buffalo Stony Brook Indiana Purdue USF Missouri Oregon Nebraska Iowa State Iowa Colorado Kansas Arizona

86%

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

100%

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

95%

Infrastructure Measures

90%

Total University Expenditures Total Expenditures per FTE Tuition & Fees Tuition & Fee Revenue per FTE State Appropriations State Appropriations per FTE Annual Giving Endowment Endowment per FTE

USF System Florida &Research Universities USF&System Florida Research Universities Retention 2004 -Rate 2009(Fall), 2004 - 2009 FreshmanRate, Retention UF FSU Miami Mean UCF

USF

85%

FIU

80%

FAU

75%

70% 2004

2005

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2007

2008

2009

USF &System Public AAU Institutions USF System Public &AAU Institutions FreshmanRate, Retention (Fall), 2004 - 2009 Retention 2004Rate - 2009

100%

AAU High

95%

Public AAU 75%

90%

Mean Public AAU 25%

USF

85% 80%

AAU Low

75% 70% 2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

System & AAU Prospects USFUSF System & AAU Prospects Freshman Retention Rate- (Fall), Retention Rate, 2004 2009 2004 - 2009

2006

100% 95%

Georgia VA Tech & NC State

90%

USF & Mean Utah & Cincinnati Colorado State UAB ASU & Illinois, Chicago

85% 80% 75% 70% 2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

SIX-YEAR GRADUATION RATE FOR FIRST TIME IN COLLEGE (FTIC) STUDENTS Definition:

Source:

The six-year graduation rate for first-time-in-college students.

Common Data Set, IPEDS

Type:

U.S. News & World Report USF System includes all member institutions (USF, USF St. Petersburg, USF Sarasota-Manatee, USF Polytechnic). USF refers to the campus located in Tampa which includes USF Health and the College of Marine Science.

& Public AAU Institutions USF System &USF Public AAU Institutions Six-Year Graduation Rates for First-Time-In-College (FTIC) students 2008 - 2009 (fall 2002 6-Year Graduation Rate for First-Time-In-College (FTIC) Students, 2008-09 cohort) Virginia UC Berkeley UCLA Michigan UNC Chapel Hill UC San Diego Penn State Maryland, College Park Illinois, Urb-Ch Florida Wisconsin-Madison UC Santa Barbara UC Irvine UC Davis UT Austin Texas A&M Washington Georgia Tech Pittsburgh Rutgers Michigan State Ohio State Indiana Purdue Missouri Colorado Iowa State Oregon Minnesota Iowa Nebraska Buffalo Stony Brook Kansas Arizona USF

USF System 6-Year Graduation Rate Fall 2003 Cohort 2009-2010: 48% 49% 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

90%

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

80%

USFSystem & Florida& Research University Peers USF Florida Research Universities 6-Year Graduation Rates Rate for Six-Year forFirst-Time-In-College First-Time-In-College(FTIC) (FTIC)Students, students 2001-02 2001/02 -- 2008-09 2008/09 UF Miami

70%

FSU Mean & UCF

60% 50%

USF & FIU

40%

FAU

30% 2001-02 (fall 95 cohort)

100%

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2003-04 (fall 97 cohort)

2004-05 (fall 98 cohort)

2005-06 (fall 99 cohort)

2006-07 (fall 00 cohort)

2007-08 (fall 01 cohort)

2008-09 (fall 02 cohort)

& Public AAU AAU Institutions USFUSF System & Public Institutions 6-Year Graduation Rate Six-Year RatesforforFirst-Time-In-College First-Time-In-College(FTIC) (FTIC)Students, students 2001-02 2001/02 --2008-09 2008/09 AAU High

90%

Public AAU 75%

80%

Mean

70%

Public AAU 25%

60%

AAU Low

50%

USF

40% 30% 2001-02 (fall 95 cohort)

2002-03 (fall 96 cohort)

90%

2002-03 (fall 96 cohort)

2003-04 (fall 97 cohort)

2004-05 (fall 98 cohort)

2005-06 (fall 99 cohort)

2006-07 (fall 00 cohort)

2007-08 (fall 01 cohort)

2008-09 (fall 02 cohort)

USF &&AAU USF System AAU Prospects Prospects 6-Year Graduation RateRates for First-Time-In-College (FTIC)(FTIC) Students, 2001-02 - 2008-09 Six-Year Graduation for First-Time-In-College students 2001/02 - 2008/09

80%

Georgia VA Tech

70%

NC State

60%

Colorado State Mean ASU Utah

50%

USF

Illinois, Chicago Cincinnati UAB

40% 30% 2001-02 (fall 95 cohort)

2002-03 (fall 96 cohort)

2003-04 (fall 97 cohort)

2004-05 (fall 98 cohort)

2005-06 (fall 99 cohort)

2006-07 (fall 00 cohort)

2007-08 (fall 01 cohort)

2008-09 (fall 02 cohort)

INTERNATIONAL STUDENT HEADCOUNT

Definition:

This variable reflects the headcount at the fall of an academic year of students who are classified as â&#x20AC;&#x153;nonresident aliensâ&#x20AC;?and are not citizens or nationals of the United States and who are in this country on a visa or temporary basis and do not have the right to remain indefinitely; reported in the IPEDS Enrollment Survey

Source: IPEDS

Type: USF

USF & Public AAU Institutions International Student Headcount, Fall 2009 USF & Public AAU Institutions International Student Headcount, Fall 2009 Illinois, Urb-Ch Purdue Michigan Michigan State Buffalo Minnesota UT Austin Texas A&M Indiana Ohio State Penn State Wisconsin-Madison Florida Georgia Tech Washington UC Berkeley UCLA Maryland, College Park Iowa State Stony Brook Rutgers Arizona Iowa Kansas Pittsburgh Virginia UC San Diego Missouri UC Davis Nebraska UC Irvine Oregon UNC Chapel Hill USF Colorado UC Santa Barbara

NATIONAL PEERS

USF International Student Headcount

1,000

2,000

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

Fall 2010: 1,423 (drop/add benchmark)

1,285

3,000

4,000

5,000

Total International Students Note: In fall 2009, the USF System began reporting separately to IPEDS; thus, fall 2009 is USF only.

6,000

7,000

8,000

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF System & Florida Research Universities USF System & Florida Research Universities International Student Headcount International Student Headcount (Fall),(Fall), 2000 2000 - 2008- 2008

4,000

3,500 3,000 2,500

FIU

2,000

Mean

1,500

Miami UCF

1,000

FSU FAU

USF

500 0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF USFSystem System& &Public PublicAAU AAUInstitutions Institutions International Student Headcount International Student Headcount(Fall), (Fall),2000 2000- 2008 - 2008

7,000 6,000

AAU High

5,000 4,000

Public AAU 75%

3,000

Mean

2,000

Public AAU 25%

USF

1,000

AAU Low

0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System AAU Prospects USF System & AAU&Prospects International Student Headcount (Fall), (Fall), 2000 -2000 2008- 2008 International Student Headcount

4,000 3,500

ASU

3,000 2,500

NC State VA Tech Illinois, Chicago Mean Cincinnati Utah

2,000 1,500

USF

Georgia Colorado State UAB

1,000 500 0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

PERCENT INTERNATIONAL STUDENT HEADCOUNT Definition:

This variable reflects percent of international students (i.e., non-resident aliens) of the total student enrollment (headcount); based on fall enrollment data reported on the IPEDS Enrollment Survey.

Source: IPEDS

Type: USF

USF & Public AAU Institutions USF & Public AAUStudent Institutions % International Headcount, Fall 2009 Percent of International Student Headcount, Fall 2009 Georgia Tech Buffalo Illinois, Urb-Ch Purdue Michigan Stony Brook Iowa State Wisconsin-Madison Michigan State Indiana UT Austin Minnesota UC Berkeley Texas A&M Penn State Washington Virginia Maryland, College Park Florida UCLA Ohio State Pittsburgh Oregon Kansas Iowa UC San Diego Nebraska UC Irvine Arizona Rutgers UNC Chapel Hill Missouri UC Davis Colorado UC Santa Barbara USF

USF Percent International Student Headcount

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

Fall 2010: 4% (drop/add benchmark) 3% 0%

10%

12%

Note: In fall 2009, the USF System began reporting separately to IPEDS; thus, fall 2009 is USF only.

14%

16%

18%

20%

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

12%

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

10%

USF System & Florida Research Universities USF System & Florida Research Universities %Percent International Student Headcount (Fall), 2000 - 2008 of International Student Headcount (Fall), 2000 - 2008

Miami

UF FIU Mean

6% 4%

FAU

USF , FSU, UCF 2% 0% 2000

2001

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF USFSystem System&&Public Public AAU AAU Institutions Institutions % International Student Headcount (Fall),(Fall), 20002000 - 2008 Percent of International Student Headcount - 2008

20% 18%

AAU High

16% 14% 12% 10% 8%

Public AAU 75% Mean

Public AAU 25%

AAU Low

USF

2% 0% 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System AAU Prospects USF System & AAU &Prospects Percent of International Student Headcount (Fall), 2000 - 2008 % International Student Headcount (Fall), 2000 - 2008

2002

9% 8%

Illinois, Chicago

NC State & VA Tech

Mean, Utah, Cincinnati

ASU & UAB

Georgia

USF & Colorado State

2% 1% 0% 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

STUDENTS STUDYING ABROAD

Definition:

This variable reflects the number of students studying abroad as reported by the Institute of International Education (IIE), Open Doors Report on Internaitonal Educational Exchange.

Source:

IIE, Open Doors

Type: USF

USF System & Public AAU Institutions Number Students Abroad, 2007-2008 USF System &ofPublic AAU Studying Institutions Number of Students Studying Abroad, 2007-08 Michigan State Missouri Minnesota UT Austin UCLA Wisconsin-Madison Washington Penn State Illinois, Urb-Ch Indiana Florida Michigan Arizona Virginia Ohio State Maryland, College Park UNC Chapel Hill Kansas Texas A&M UC Davis Pittsburgh Colorado Purdue Iowa Iowa State UC San Diego UC Irvine Oregon UC Berkeley Georgia Tech Rutgers Nebraska USF Buffalo

NATIONAL PEERS

USF System Students Studying Abroad 2008-2009: 533 undergraduate: 437 graduate: 96 2009-2010: 810 (est.) undergraduate: 622 graduate: 188

664 0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

Total Number of Students

2,500

3,000

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

3,500

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

Note: Data for Stony Brook and UC Santa Barbara not reported for current year.

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

2,500

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

2,000

USF System & Florida Research Universities USF System & Florida Research Universities Number of Students Studying Abroad, 2000-01 - 2007-08 Number of Students Studying Abroad, 2000/01 - 2007/08

UF FSU

1,500 1,000

Mean

USF

FIU Miami UCF

500

0 2000/01

2001/02

2002/03

2003/04

2004/05

2005/06

2006/07

Note: FAU data not reported consistently; data not displayed

USFUSF System & Public AAUAAU Institutions System & Public Institutions Number of Students Studying Abroad, 2000/01 - 2007/08 Number of Students Studying Abroad, 2000-01 - 2007-08

3,500 3,000

AAU High

2,500 2,000

Public AAU 75%

1,500

Mean

Public AAU 25%

1,000

USF AAU Low

500 0 2000/01

2001/02

2007/08

2002/03

2003/04

2004/05

2005/06

2006/07

2007/08

USF USF System System && AAU AAU Prospects Prospects Number of Students Studying Studying Abroad, 2000-01 2007-08 2000/01 - 2007/08

2,500 2,000

Georgia

1,500

ASU

1,000

VA Tech NC State Mean Cincinnati

USF

Colorado State Utah

500

Illinois, Chicago

0 2000/01

2001/02

2002/03

2003/04

Note: UAB data not reported consistently; data not displayed

2004/05

2005/06

2006/07

2007/08

PERCENT STUDENTS STUDYING ABROAD

Definition:

This variable reflects the percent of students enrolled in a study abroad program as reported by the Institute of International Education (IIE), Open Doors Report on Internaitonal Educational Exchange.

Source: IPEDS

Type: USF

USF & Public AAU Institutions USF &%Public Institutions StudyAAU Abroad, 2007 Percent of Students Studying Abroad, Fall 2007 Missouri Virginia Michigan State UCLA UNC Chapel Hill Wisconsin-Madison Washington Indiana Kansas Arizona Minnesota Illinois, Urb-Ch Penn State Pittsburgh Oregon Michigan UT Austin Maryland, College Park UC Davis Iowa State Georgia Tech Iowa Colorado Florida UC San Diego UC Irvine Ohio State Nebraska Purdue Texas A&M UC Berkeley Rutgers Buffalo USF

NATIONAL PEERS

USF Percent of Students Studying Abroad Fall 2008: 1% Fall 2009: 2% 1% 0%

Note: Data not available for Stony Brook and UC Santa Barbara, Fall 2007.

10%

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF&System Florida Research Universities USF System Florida &Research Universities Percent Students2000 Studying % StudyofAbroad, - 2007Abroad, 2000 - 2007

5.0% 4.5%

FSU

4.0%

3.5%

Miami

3.0% 2.5%

Mean

2.0% FAU

1.5%

USF

1.0%

FIU

0.5%

UCF

0.0% 2000

2001

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2003

2004

2005

2006

USF System Public &AAU Institutions USF &System Public AAU Institutions % Study Abroad, 2000 - 2007 Percent of Students Studying Abroad, 2000 - 2007

10% 9%

AAU High

8% 7% 6% 5%

Public AAU 75%

Mean Public AAU 25%

3% 2%

USF

AAU Low

0% 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

USFUSF System & AAU Prospects System & AAU Prospects Percent%ofStudy Students Studying Abroad, 2000 -Abroad, 2007 2000 - 2007

Georgia

6% 5% 4%

VA Tech ASU NC State Cincinnati Mean Colorado State Utah

3% 2%

USF

UAB Illinois, Chicago

1% 0% 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

STUDENT-TO-FACULTY RATIO

Definition:

Source:

The student-to-faculty ratio is the total FTE students not in graduate or professional programs divided by total FTE instructional staff not teaching in graduate or professional programs, as reported in the IPEDS Fall Enrollment survey.

IPEDS

Type:

IPEDS, USF

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USFRatio, & Public Student-to-Faculty FallAAU 2009Institutions Student-to-Faculty Ratio, Fall 2009 Washington Michigan UNC Chapel Hill Rutgers Purdue Pittsburgh Iowa Ohio State UC Davis UC Berkeley Buffalo Iowa State UT Austin Nebraska UC Santa Barbara UCLA Penn State Michigan State Virginia Maryland, College Park Colorado Georgia Tech Missouri Illinois, Urb-Ch UC San Diego UC Irvine Texas A&M Stony Brook Indiana Kansas Florida Arizona Minnesota Wisconsin-Madison Oregon USF

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

27 0

Note: In fall 2009, the USF System began reporting separately to IPEDS; thus, fall 2008 is for the USF System and fall 2009 is USF.

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF System & Florida Research Universities USF System & Florida Research Universities Student-to-Faculty Fall- 2008 Student-to-Faculty Ratio, Ratio, Fall 2008 2009 & 2009 Miami FAU UF Mean FSU FIU

2009

USF

2008

UCF 0

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF System & Public AAU Institutions Student-to-Faculty Ratio,Ratio, Fall 2008 - 2009& 2009 Student-to-Faculty Fall 2008 AAU Low Public AAU 25% Mean Public AAU 75% 2009

AAU High

2008

USF 0

Note: In fall 2009, the USF System began reporting separately to IPEDS; thus, fall 2008 is for the USF System and fall 2009 is USF.

USF & System & AAU Prospects USF System AAU Prospects Student-to-Faculty Ratio, Fall 2008Fall - 2009 Student-to-Faculty Ratio, 2008 & 2009 Utah VA Tech Cincinnati UAB NC State Mean Illinois, Chicago Georgia

2009

Colorado State

2008

ASU USF 0

Note: In fall 2009, the USF System began reporting separately to IPEDS; thus, fall 2008 is for the USF System and fall 2009 is USF.

USF E-PROFILE: FALL 2010, PRELIMINARY

USFâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s eProfiles application displays select institutional metrics on new and all students by campus and for the total USF system at each enrollment benchmark for each term. Data are compared to comparable benchmarks in the previous like term. USF System includes all member institutions (USF, USF St. Petersburg, USF Sarasota-Manatee, USF Polytechnic). USF refers to the campus located in Tampa which includes USF Health and the College of Marine Science.

USF E-PROFILE: FALL 2010, PRELIMINARY, continued

FACULTY

Strategic Performance Metrics

* AAU Indicator – Phase I ** AAU Indicator – Phase II

TENURED / TENURE TRACK FACULTY

Definition:

This variable reflects the number of total employees at an institution classified with the faculty status of tenure/tenure-track as reported in the IPEDS Human Resources survey; counts reflect fall reporting.

Source: IPEDS

Type: USF

USF System & Public AAU Institutions Total Tenure/Tenure-Track Faculty, Fall 2008 USF System & Public AAU Institutions Total Tenured / Tenure-Track Faculty, Fall 2008 Florida Ohio State Michigan Minnesota Wisconsin-Madison Illinois, Urb-Ch Michigan State UT Austin Purdue UNC Chapel Hill Texas A&M UCLA Penn State Iowa Pittsburgh Arizona Washington Rutgers Maryland, College Park Indiana Kansas UC Davis Virginia UC Berkeley Iowa State Missouri USF Buffalo Nebraska UC San Diego Colorado UC Irvine Stony Brook Georgia Tech UC Santa Barbara Oregon

NATIONAL PEERS

1,281

Tenured/Tenure Track Faculty Fall 2009 USF System: 1,268 USF: 1,144

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

Total Tenured/Tenure Track Faculty

2,500

3,000

3,500

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

3,500

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

3,000

Infrastructure Measures

2,500

Total University Expenditures Total Expenditures per FTE Tuition & Fees Tuition & Fee Revenue per FTE State Appropriations State Appropriations per FTE Annual Giving Endowment Endowment per FTE

USF System & Florida Research University Peers USF System & Florida Research Universities Total Tenure/Tenure-Track Faculty (Fall), 20022002 - 2008 Total Tenured / Tenure-Track Faculty (Fall), - 2008 UF

2,000 1,500

USF

Mean Miami FSU UCF FIU FAU

1,000 500 0 2002

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF USFSystem System&& Public Public AAU AAU Institutions Institutions Total / Tenure-TrackFaculty Faculty(Fall), (Fall),2002 2002- -2008 2008 TotalTenured Tenure/Tenure-Track

3,500

AAU High

3,000 2,500 2,000

Public AAU 75% Mean

1,500

USF

Public AAU 25%

1,000

AAU Low

500 0 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System & AAU Prospects USF System & AAU Prospects TotalTenure/Tenure-Track Tenured / Tenure-Track Faculty (Fall), 2002 - 2008 Total Faculty (Fall), 2002 - 2008

2,000

ASU

1,800

Georgia

1,600

NC State VA Tech Illinois, Chicago Utah Mean

1,400

USF

UAB Cincinnati

1,200 1,000

Colorado State

800 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

FULL-TIME INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF

Definition:

This variable reflects the number of full-time employees at an institution categorized as instructional as reported in the IPEDS Human Resources survey; counts reflect fall reporting. Total includes tenured, on tenure track, non-tenure track and those without faculty status classification.

Source: IPEDS

Type: USF

USF System & Public AAU Institutions Total Full-Time Staff, AAU Fall 2008 USFInstructional System & Public Institutions Total Full-Time Instructional Staff, Fall 2008 Michigan Texas A&M UT Austin Penn State Michigan State Florida Purdue Illinois, Urb-Ch Ohio State Minnesota Washington UCLA Indiana Pittsburgh Maryland, College Park Wisconsin-Madison Rutgers UNC Chapel Hill Arizona UC Berkeley UC Davis Colorado Iowa State Iowa Missouri USF Kansas Virginia Nebraska Buffalo UC San Diego UC Irvine Georgia Tech UC Santa Barbara Stony Brook Oregon

1,261

USF System Full-Time Instructional Staff Fall 2009: 1,098

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

Total Full-Time Instructional Staff

2,500

3,000

3,500

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF System & Florida& Research University Peers USF System Florida Research Universities Total Full-Time Instructional Staff (Fall), 2002 - 2008- 2008 Total Full-Time Instructional Staff (Fall), 2002

2,500 2,300

2,100 1,900 1,700 1,500

FSU

1,300

USF

Mean UCF Miami

1,100 900

FIU FAU

700 500 2002

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF USFSystem System&&Public PublicAAU AAUInstitutions Institutions TotalFull-Time Full-TimeInstructional InstructionalStaff Staff(Fall), (Fall),2002 2002- -2008 2008 Total

3,500

AAU High

3,000 2,500

Public AAU 75%

2,000

Mean

1,500

USF

Public AAU 25%

1,000

AAU Low

500 0 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System & AAU Prospects USF System & AAU Prospects Total Full-Time Instructional Staff (Fall), 2002 - 2008 Total Full-Time Instructional Staff (Fall), 2002 - 2008

2,500

ASU

2,000 NC State Georgia Mean VA Tech Cincinnati Utah

1,500

USF

Illinois, Chicago Colorado State

1,000

UAB

500 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

FACULTY AWARDS

AAU Phase I Indicator Definition:

Source:

The number of institutional affiliated faculty members receiving awards from 24 prominent grant and fellowship programs in the arts, humanities, science, engineering, and health fields as reported by The Center’s Top American Research Universities (TARU). A list of these faculty awards is available in the TARU’s source notes. The number reported is for the academic year that preceded the reporting year.The number of faculty awards is also a membership eligibility requirement for the Association of American Universities (AAU). A list of the 27 awards considered by the AAU is available in the AAU’s Membership Policy.

TARU

Type:

AAU, TARU

USF System includes all member institutions (USF, USF St. Petersburg, USF Sarasota-Manatee, USF Polytechnic). USF refers to the campus located in Tampa which includes Health&and the College of Marine Science. USFUSF System Public AAU Institutions

Faculty Awards, 2008 USF System & Public AAU Institutions Faculty Awards, 2008

Michigan UC Berkeley Washington Wisconsin-Madison Illinois, Urb-Ch UC San Diego UCLA UNC Chapel Hill Pittsburgh UT Austin UC Irvine Penn State Minnesota Rutgers Ohio State Virginia Florida Arizona UC Davis Texas A&M Indiana Iowa Maryland, College Park Colorado Buffalo Michigan State USF Oregon Georgia Tech Missouri UC Santa Barbara Kansas Purdue Stony Brook Nebraska Iowa State

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

USF System Faculty Awards 2009: 12

Total Faculty Awards

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

USFSystem System &&Florida FloridaResearch Research Universities University Peers USF Faculty Awards, 2001 2008 Faculty Awards, 2001 - 2008

15 UCF

USF

Mean & FIU

Miami FSU

0 2001

2002

2003

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2005

2006

2007

2008

System & Public Institutions USFUSF System & Public AAUAAU Institutions Faculty Awards, - 2008 Faculty Awards, 20012001 - 2008

AAU High

50 40 30

Public AAU 75% AAU Mean

USF

AAU Low

0 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF USFSystem System&&AAU AAUProspects Prospects FacultyAwards, Awards,2001 2001--2008 2008 Faculty

25 20

VA Tech Utah

USF & Illinois, Chicago NC State Mean, ASU, Georgia

10 5

Cincinatti Colorado State & UAB

0 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

NATIONAL ACADEMY MEMBERS

AAU Phase I Indicator Definition:

National Academy members reflects the number of USF faculty members who are members of a national academy as reported by TheCenter (Top American Research Universities). Membership in these organizations is reported annually: National Academy of Sciences (NAS), the National Academy of Engineering (NAE), or the Institute of Medicine (IOM). Academy memberships as reported by TheCenter are an eligibility measure for the Association of American Universities (AAU).

Source: TARU

Type:

AAU, TARU

USF System & Public AAU Institutions

National Academy USF System & Public AAU Members, Institutions2008 National Academy Members, 2008 UC Berkeley UC San Diego Washington UCLA Michigan Wisconsin-Madison UT Austin Illinois, Urb-Ch UC Santa Barbara UC Irvine Rutgers Minnesota UNC Chapel Hill UC Davis Virginia Colorado Georgia Tech Maryland, College Park Arizona Pittsburgh Penn State Ohio State Texas A&M Purdue Iowa Florida Stony Brook Indiana Iowa State Michigan State Oregon Missouri Kansas Buffalo USF Nebraska

USF System National Academy Members 2009: 3

3 0

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

100

150

Total National Academy Members

200

250

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

Dollars in Thousands

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

USF Peers USFSystem System& &Florida FloridaResearch ResearchUniversity Universities National Academy Members, 2000 2008 National Academy Members, 2000 - 2008

15 10 FSU&Miami Mean

USF

FAU&FIU UCF

0 2000

2001

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF System & Public AAU Institutions National Academy Members, 2000 -2000 2008 - 2008 National Academy Members,

225

AAU High

200 175 150 125 100 75 50

Public AAU 75% AAU Mean Public AAU 25%

USF

AAU Low

0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System & AAU &Prospects USF System AAU Prospects Academy Members, NationalNational Academy Members, 2000 - 2000 2008 - 2008

ASU

NC State Utah

VA Tech Mean

Georgia & Cincinnati Colorado State, UAB, Illinois, Chicago

USF 0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

CITATION IMPACT

AAU Phase I Indicator Definition:

The citation impact factor is a measure of the frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Citations are tracked in two ways: (1)The Florida Board of Governors tracks the number of persons at each SUS institution who are listed as Highly Cited Scholars in the database maintained by ISIHighlyCited.com. The number of Highly Cited Scholars per institution is reported here.The Association of American Universities (AAU) considers citations as a membership eligibility measure. The U.S. University Science Indicators citations database provides annually updated information.

Source:

Thompson ISI

Type: USF

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF Impact, System 2003-2007 & Public AAU Institutions 5-Year Citation 5-Year Citation Impact, 2003 - 2007 Washington UC San Diego UCLA UC Berkeley UNC Chapel Hill Pittsburgh Stony Brook UC Santa Barbara UC Irvine Michigan Virginia Arizona Wisconsin-Madison Colorado Texas A&M Iowa Minnesota Oregon Rutgers Indiana Penn State Ohio State UC Davis UT Austin Buffalo USF Maryland, College Park Illinois, Urb-Ch Michigan State Iowa State Kansas Florida Georgia Tech Missouri Purdue Nebraska 0.00

6.14

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

Five-Year Citation Impact Factor

10.00

12.00

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

USF&System Florida Research Institutions USF System Florida&Research Universities 5-Year Citation Impact, 1981/1985 - 2003/2007 5-Year Citation Impact, 1981-1985 - 2003-2007 Miami

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

USF

Infrastructure Measures

FSU

Total University Expenditures Total Expenditures per FTE Tuition & Fees Tuition & Fee Revenue per FTE State Appropriations State Appropriations per FTE Annual Giving Endowment Endowment per FTE

UF Mean FIU 2003-2007

UCF

1981-1985

FAU 0.00

1.00

2.00

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

USF &System Public AAU Institutions USF System Public &AAU Institutions 5-Year Citation - 2003-2007 5-Year Impact, Citation 1981-1985 Impact, 1981/1985 - 2003/2007 AAU High Public AAU 75% Mean USF Public AAU 25%

2003-2007

AAU Low

1981-1985

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

Note: Calculated totals include five university systems

3.00

USF & System & AAU Prospects USF System AAU Prospects 5-Year Impact, Citation 1981-1985 Impact, 1981/1985 - 2003/2007 5-Year Citation - 2003-2007 UAB Cincinnati Utah USF Mean Colorado State ASU Illinois, Chicago 2003-2007

Georgia NC State

1981-1985

VA Tech 0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

10.00

TOTAL RESEARCH EXPENDITURES PER TENURED / TENURE TRACK FACULTY Definition:

This variable reflects the ratio of total NSF research expenditures (research expenditures resulting from all external funding sources) and total employees at an institution classified with the faculty status of tenure/tenure-track, as reported to the National Science Foundation and IPEDS respectively.

PUBLIC AAUs

Source:

NSF, IPEDS

Type: USF

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF System & Publicby AAU Institutions Total Research Expenditures Total Tenure/Tenure-Track Faculty (Fall), 2002 - 2008 Total Research Expenditures by Total Tenured / Tenure Track Faculty, Fall 2008 UC San Diego Georgia Tech Washington Colorado UCLA UC Davis UC Berkeley Wisconsin-Madison Penn State Pittsburgh Arizona Michigan Texas A&M Nebraska UC Irvine Buffalo Indiana UNC Chapel Hill Stony Brook Minnesota Maryland, College Park UT Austin UC Santa Barbara Ohio State Illinois, Urb-Ch Purdue USF Rutgers Florida Missouri Iowa Michigan State Virginia Iowa State Kansas Oregon

NATIONAL PEERS

$217,000

USF System Total Research Expenditures per Tenured/Tenure Track Faculty Fall 2009: $244,000

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

Dollars in Thousands

Dollars in Thousands 54

$600

$700

$800

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

$250

USF System & Florida Research Universities Total / Tenure TrackFaculty Faculty(Fall), (Fall),2002 2002--2008 2008 TotalResearch Research Expenditures Expenditures by by Total TotalTenured Tenure/Tenure-Track USF

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

$200

Miami UF

$150

FSU Mean

FIU UCF

$100

FAU

$50

$0 2002

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USFSystem System &&Public PublicAAU AAUInstitutions Institutions USF TotalResearch ResearchExpenditures ExpendituresbybyTotal TotalTenured Tenure/Tenure-Track (Fall), 2002 2002 -- 2008 2008 Total / Tenure Track Faculty (Fall),

$800

AAU High

$700 $600 $500 $400

Public AAU 75%

$300

Mean

$200

Public AAU 25%

$100

AAU Low

USF

$0 2002

2003

$350

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USFSystem System & AAU Prospects USF & AAU Prospects Total Research Expenditures by by Total Tenured / Tenure Track Faculty Total Research Expenditures Total Tenure/Tenure-Track Faculty(Fall), (Fall),2002 2002- 2008 - 2008 UAB Colorado State Cincinnati

$300 $250

VA Tech Mean & NC State Illinois, Chicago

$200

Georgia

USF

Utah

$150

ASU

$100 $50 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

FULL PROFESSOR AVERAGE SALARIES

Definition:

Source:

This variable reflects the average salaries of full professors as reported in the American Association of University Professors (AAUP)

AAUP

Type: USF

USF System & Public AAU Institutions Full Professor Average Salaries, 2008-09 USF System & Public AAU Institutions Full Professor Average Salaries, 2008-09 UCLA UC Berkeley UNC Chapel Hill Michigan Georgia Tech Rutgers Virginia Maryland, College Park UT Austin UC San Diego UC Irvine UC Santa Barbara Penn State Minnesota Stony Brook Buffalo Illinois, Urb-Ch Iowa Ohio State Pittsburgh Michigan State Colorado UC Davis Indiana Washington Texas A&M Florida Kansas Arizona Purdue Missouri Iowa State Nebraska Wisconsin-Madison USF Oregon

USF System Full Professor Average Salaries 2009-2010: $107,000

$102 $80

$90

$100

$110

$120

$130

$140

$150

Salaries in Thousands

Thousands

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF System & Florida Research Universities USF System & Florida Research Universities Professor Average Salaries, 2001/02 - 2008/09 FullFull Professor Average Salaries, 2001-02 - 2008-09

$140,000

Miami

$130,000 $120,000

UCF UF Mean FIU FSU

$110,000

USF

$100,000

FAU

$90,000 $80,000 $70,000 $60,000 2001

2002

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USFSystem System& &Public PublicAAU AAUInstitutions Institutions USF Full Professor Average Salaries, 2001/02 - 2008/09 Full Professor Average Salaries, 2001-02 - 2008-09

$150,000

AAU High

$140,000

Public AAU 75%

$130,000

Mean

$120,000

Public AAU 25%

$110,000

USF

$100,000

AAU Low

$90,000 $80,000 $70,000 $60,000 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

USF System & AAU Prospects USF System & AAU Prospects FullFull Professor Average Salaries, 2001-02 - 2008-09 Professor Average Salaries, 2001/02 - 2008/09

$120,000

2008

$105,000

ASU VA Tech Illinois, Chicago UAB NC State Utah Mean Georgia Colorado State

$100,000

Cincinnati

$115,000 $110,000

USF

$95,000 $90,000 $85,000 $80,000 $75,000 $70,000 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR AVERAGE SALARIES

Definition:

Source:

This variable reflects the average salaries of associate professors as reported in the American Association of University Professors (AAUP)

AAUP

Type: USF

USF System & Public AAU Institutions Associate Professor Average Salaries, 2008/09 USF System & Public AAU Institutions Associate Professor Average Salaries, 2008-09 UC Berkeley Maryland, College Park UNC Chapel Hill Michigan UCLA Rutgers Georgia Tech Stony Brook Virginia Colorado Buffalo Washington Minnesota Michigan State UC San Diego UT Austin Penn State UC Irvine Illinois, Urb-Ch Iowa Ohio State Indiana Pittsburgh UC Davis Iowa State Arizona Purdue Kansas Texas A&M Wisconsin-Madison Florida UC Santa Barbara Missouri Nebraska USF Oregon

USF System Associate Professor Average Salaries 2009-2010: $77,000

$74 $50

$55

$60

$65

$70

$75

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

$80

Salaries in Thousands

$85

$90

$95

$100

Thousands

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF System & Florida Research Universities USF System & Florida Research Universities Associate Professor Average Salaries, 2001-02 - 2008-09 AssociateProfessor Average Salaries, 2001/02 - 2008/09

$90,000

Miami

$85,000

FIU UF UCF Mean

$80,000 $75,000

USF FSU FAU

$70,000 $65,000 $60,000 $55,000 $50,000 2001

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

System & Public Institutions USF USF System & Public AAU AAU Institutions Associate Professor Average Salaries, 2001/02 - 2008/09 Associate Professor Average Salaries, 2001-02 - 2008-09

$100,000

AAU High

$95,000 $90,000

Public AAU 75%

$85,000

Mean

$80,000

Public AAU 25%

$75,000

USF

AAU Low

$70,000 $65,000 $60,000 $55,000 $50,000 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF USF System & AAU& Prospects System AAU Prospects Associate Professor Average Salaries, 2001-02 - 2008-09 Associate Professor Average Salaries, 2001/02 - 2008/09

2002

$90,000

$75,000

NC State VA Tech Illinois, Chicago Colorado State ASU Mean UAB Utah Georgia

$70,000

Cincinnati

$85,000 $80,000

USF

$65,000 $60,000 $55,000 $50,000 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR AVERAGE SALARIES

Definition:

Source:

This variable reflects the average salaries of assistant professors as reported in the American Association of University Professors (AAUP)

AAUP

Type: USF

USF&System & Public AAU Institutions USF System Public AAU Institutions AssistantAssistant ProfessorProfessor Average Salaries, Average 2008-09 Salaries, 2008/09 Maryland, College Park UNC Chapel Hill UC Berkeley UT Austin Michigan Georgia Tech UCLA Washington UC San Diego UC Irvine UC Davis Virginia Illinois, Urb-Ch Colorado Minnesota Rutgers UC Santa Barbara Ohio State Iowa Buffalo Stony Brook Iowa State Purdue Indiana Wisconsin-Madison Penn State Pittsburgh Texas A&M Florida Michigan State Arizona Oregon Nebraska Kansas USF Missouri

USF System Assistant Professor Average Salaries 2009-2010: $65,600

$63 $40

$45

$50

$55

$60

$65

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

$70

Salaries in Thousands

$75

$80

$85

$90

Thousands

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

$80,000

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

$75,000

Infrastructure Measures

$70,000

Total University Expenditures Total Expenditures per FTE Tuition & Fees Tuition & Fee Revenue per FTE State Appropriations State Appropriations per FTE Annual Giving Endowment Endowment per FTE

System & Florida Research Universities USF USF System & Florida Research Universities Assistant Professor Average Salaries, 2001-02 - 2008-09 Assistant Professor Average Salaries, 2001/02 - 2008/09 Miami FIU FSU Mean UF UCF

$65,000

USF FAU

$60,000 $55,000 $50,000 $45,000 2001

2002

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

System & Public Institutions USFUSF System & Public AAUAAU Institutions Assistant Professor Average Salaries, 2001/02 - 2008/09 Assistant Professor Average Salaries, 2001-02 - 2008-09

$90,000 $85,000

AAU High

$80,000

Public AAU 75%

$75,000

Mean

$70,000

Public AAU 25%

$65,000

USF

AAU Low

$60,000 $55,000 $50,000 $45,000 $40,000 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

USF USF System & AAU& Prospects System AAU Prospects Assistant Professor Average Salaries, 2001-02 - 2008-09 Assistant Professor Average Salaries, 2001/02 - 2008/09

$75,000 $70,000 $65,000

2008

Illinois, Chicago NC State Utah Georgia ASU VA Tech Mean Colorado State UAB

USF

$60,000

Cincinnati

$55,000 $50,000 $45,000 2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

RESEARCH

Strategic Strategic Performance Performance Metrics Metrics

Faculty Faculty •• Tenured Tenured // Tenure Tenure Track Track Faculty Faculty •• Full-Time Full-Time Instructional Instructional Staff Staff •• Faculty Faculty Awards Awards ** •• National National Academy Academy Members Members ** •• Citation Citation Impact Impact ** •• Total Total Research Research Expenditures Expenditures per per Tenured Tenured // Tenure Tenure Track Track Faculty Faculty •• Full Full Professors Professors Average Average Salary Salary •• Associate Associate Professors Professors Average Average Salary Salary •• Assistant Assistant Professors Professors Average Average Salary Salary

Infrastructure Infrastructure •• Total Total University University Expenditures Expenditures •• Total Total Expenditures Expenditures per per Student Student FTE FTE •• Tuition Tuition & & Fees Fees •• Tuition Tuition & & Fee Fee Revenues Revenues per per Total Total Student Student FTE FTE •• State State Appropriations Appropriations •• State State Appropriations Appropriations per per Student Student FTE FTE •• Annual Annual Giving Giving •• Endowment Endowment •• Endowment Endowment per per Total Total Student Student FTE FTE

Students Students •• Total Total Student Student Headcount Headcount •• Total Total Student Student FTE FTE •• Graduate Graduate Student Student Headcount Headcount •• Percent Percent Graduate Graduate Student Student Headcount Headcount •• Doctorates Doctorates Awarded Awarded ** ** •• First First Time Time in in College College (FTIC) (FTIC) Student Student Enrollment Enrollment •• Median Median SAT SAT Score Score ** •• FTICs FTICs in in Top Top 10% 10% of of High High School School Class Class •• National National Merit Merit Scholars Scholars •• Percent Percent Undergraduates Undergraduates Receiving Receiving Pell Pell Grant Grant Aid Aid •• Percent Percent of of Classes Classes with with Fewer Fewer than than 20 20 Students Students •• Percent Percent of of Classes Classes with with 50 50 or or More More Students Students •• Freshman Freshman Retention Retention Rates Rates •• Six Six Year Year Graduation Graduation Rate Rate for for First First Time Time in in College College (FTIC) (FTIC) Students Students •• International International Student Student Headcount Headcount •• Percent Percent International International Student Student Headcount Headcount •• Students Students Studying Studying Abroad Abroad •• Percent Percent Students Students Studying Studying Abroad Abroad •• Student-to-Faculty Student-to-Faculty Ratio Ratio

Research Research •• NSF NSF Total Total Research Research Expenditures Expenditures •• AAU AAU Federal Federal Research Research Expenditures Expenditures ** •• NSF NSF Non-Federal Non-Federal Research Research Expenditures Expenditures •• Research Research Performance Performance Index Index (RPI) (RPI) •• Postdoctoral Postdoctoral Appointees Appointees ** ** •• Non-Faculty Non-Faculty Researchers Researchers with with Doctorates Doctorates •• Invention Invention Disclosures Disclosures Received Received •• Total Total Patents Patents Issued Issued •• Total Total Licenses Licenses // Options Options Executed Executed •• Cumulative Cumulative Active Active Licenses Licenses •• License License Income Income Received Received •• Startups Startups Initiated Initiated

** AAU AAU Indicator Indicator –– Phase Phase II ** ** AAU AAU Indicator Indicator –– Phase Phase IIII

15 15

NSF TOTAL RESEARCH EXPENDITURES

Definition:

This measure reflects research expenditures resulting from all external funding sources (federal, state, local, business, and industry). These data are collected by the National Science Foundation. Figures reported by fiscal year (FY).

PUBLIC AAUs

Source:

NSF Expenditure Survey

Type:

AAU, NSF

System & Public Institutions USF USF System & Public AAU AAU Institutions NSF Total Research Expenditures, FYFY2008 2008 Total Research Expenditures, Wisconsin-Madison Michigan UCLA UC San Diego Washington Ohio State Penn State Minnesota UC Davis Pittsburgh UC Berkeley Florida Texas A&M Arizona Colorado UNC Chapel Hill Georgia Tech Illinois, Urb-Ch UT Austin Purdue Indiana Maryland, College Park Michigan State Nebraska Buffalo UC Irvine Rutgers Iowa USF System Virginia Stony Brook Missouri Iowa State Kansas UC Santa Barbara Oregon

NATIONAL PEERS

$278,419

USF System NSF Total Research Expenditures FY 2009: $309 million FY 2010: $332 million (est.)

$200,000

$400,000

$600,000

Dollars in Thousands

$800,000

$1,000,000

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

$600,000

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

$500,000

Dollars in Thousands

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

Student Measures

$400,000 $300,000

USF

$200,000

Miami Mean FSU

$100,000

UCF FIU FAU

$0 2000

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

AAU High

$800,000 $700,000 $600,000

Public AAU 75%

$500,000

AAU Mean

$400,000 Public AAU 25%

$300,000

USF

$200,000 $100,000

AAU Low

$0 2000

Research Measures

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2002

$900,000

Faculty Measures

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

System & AAU Prospects USFUSF System & AAU Prospects NSF Total 2000 --FY 2008 TotalResearch ResearchExpenditures, Expenditures,FY FY2000 FY2008 UAB

$400,000

$300,000

VA Tech NC State Georgia Cincinnati Illinois, Chicago Mean Colorado State

$250,000

ASU Utah

$350,000 Dollars in Thousands

2001

USFUSF System & Public AAU Institutions System & Public AAU Institutions NSF Total Research Expenditures, FY 2008 Total Research Expenditures, FY2000 2000- -FY FY2008

$1,000,000

Dollars in Thousands

USFSystem System&&Florida FloridaResearch ResearchUniversities University Peers USF NSF Total 2008 TotalResearch ResearchExpenditures, Expenditures,FY FY2000 2000- -FY FY2008

USF

$200,000 $150,000 $100,000 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

AAU FEDERAL RESEARCH EXPENDITURES AAU Phase I Indicator Definition:

These data are collected by the National Science Foundation. This metric is defined by the AAU Membership Committee as NSF federal funding minus NSF agricultural (USDA) funding.

Source:

NSF Expenditure Survey

Type:

AAU, NSF USF System includes all member institutions (USF, USF St. Petersburg, USF Sarasota-Manatee, USF Polytechnic). USF refers to the campus located in Tampa which includes USF Health and the College of Marine Science.

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF System & AAU PublicInstitutions AAUFY Institutions System & Public AAUUSF Federal Research Expenditures, 2008 AAU Federal Research Expenditures, FY 2008FY2008 AAU Federal Research Expenditures, Washington Michigan UC San Diego UCLA Wisconsin-Madison Pittsburgh Colorado Penn State UNC Chapel Hill Minnesota UT Austin Ohio State Georgia Tech Arizona UC Davis UC Berkeley Illinois, Urb-Ch Iowa Maryland, College Park Virginia Florida Texas A&M Indiana UC Irvine USF System Purdue Buffalo Rutgers Michigan State Nebraska Kansas UC Santa Barbara Stony Brook Missouri Iowa State Oregon

$169,910

NATIONAL PEERS

USF System AAU Federal Research Expenditures

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

FY 2009: $191 million FY 2010: $183 million (est.)

$100,000

$200,000

$300,000

$400,000

Dollars in Thousands

$500,000

$600,000

$700,000

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

$250,000

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

$200,000

Dollars in Thousands

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

USF Florida Research University Universities Peers USF& System & Florida Research AAU Federal Research Expenditures, FY2000 - FY2008 AAU Federal Research Expenditures, FY 2000 - FY 2008

USF

Miami

$150,000 $100,000

FSU Mean

$50,000

UCF FIU

Student Measures

FAU

$0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

$500,000 $400,000

Public AAU 75%

$300,000

AAU Mean

Faculty Measures

$200,000

USF

Public AAU 25%

$100,000

AAU Low

$0 2000

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

$350,000

UAB

$300,000 $250,000 Dollars in Thousands

2008

USF USFSystem System&&AAU AAUProspects Prospects AAU Federal Research Expenditures, FY 2000 - FY 2008 AAU Federal Research Expenditures, FY2000 - FY2008

2008

AAU High

$600,000

2007

USFSystem System&&Public PublicAAU AAUInstitutions Institutions USF AAU 2000 - -FY 2008 AAUFederal FederalResearch ResearchExpenditures, Expenditures,FY FY2000 FY2008

$700,000

Dollars in Thousands

Cincinnati

$200,000

Illinois, Chicago Utah

$150,000

Mean Colorado State ASU VA Tech NC State Georgia

USF

$100,000 $50,000 $0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

NSF NON-FEDERAL RESEARCH EXPENDITURES

Definition:

Source:

These data represent the nonfederally financed R&D expenditures at universities and colleges as NSF Expenditure Survey reported by the National Science Foundation. The AAU Membership Committee recognizes that Type: these sources of academic research support fund high-quality research; however, since thery are AAU, NSF generally not allocated through competitive, merit-review processes, they are considered as Phase II indicators for membership consideration. Non-federal funding sources include associations, foundations, and industry. USF System includes all member institutions (USF, USF St. Petersburg, USF Sarasota-Manatee, USF Polytechnic). USF refers to the campus located in Tampa which includes USF Health and the College of Marine Science.

USF System & Public AAU Institutions NSF Non-Federal FY2008 USFResearch System &Expenditures, Public AAU Institutions NSF Non-Federal Research Expenditures, FY 2008

Wisconsin-Madison UCLA UC Davis Ohio State Florida UC San Diego UC Berkeley Texas A&M Minnesota Penn State Michigan Arizona Purdue Georgia Tech Illinois, Urb-Ch Indiana Nebraska Michigan State Rutgers Buffalo UT Austin Maryland, College Park UNC Chapel Hill Washington Stony Brook UC Irvine Pittsburgh Missouri Iowa State USF Colorado Kansas UC Santa Barbara Iowa Virginia Oregon

$108,508

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

$100,000

$200,000

$300,000

Dollars in Thousands

$400,000

$500,000

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

$400,000

$300,000 Dollars in Thousands

Total University Expenditures Total Expenditures per FTE Tuition & Fees Tuition & Fee Revenue per FTE State Appropriations State Appropriations per FTE Annual Giving Endowment Endowment per FTE

$200,000 $150,000

USF

Mean Miami FSU UCF FIU FAU

$50,000 $0 2000

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

AAU High

$400,000 $350,000

Public AAU 75%

$300,000 $250,000

Mean

$200,000 $150,000

Public AAU 25%

$100,000

USF

$50,000 AAU Low

$0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

USF USFSystem System&&AAU AAUProspects Prospects NSF Non-Federal Research Expenditures, FY 2000 - FY 2008 NSF Non-Federal Research Expenditures, FY2000 - FY2008

Research Measures

$250,000

2008

Georgia NC State

$200,000 Dollars in Thousands

2001

USFUSF System & Public AAU Institutions System & Public AAU Institutions NSFNSF Non-Federal Research Expenditures, FY FY2000 2000 - FY- FY2008 2008 Non-Federal Research Expenditures,

$450,000

Dollars in Thousands

Faculty Measures

$250,000

$100,000

$350,000

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES Infrastructure Measures

USFUSF System & Florida Research University Peers System & Florida Research Universities NSFNon-Federal Non-Federal Research Research Expenditures, Expenditures,FY2000 FY 2000- -FY2008 FY 2008 NSF

Mean Illinois, Chicago ASU Cincinnati

$150,000

USF

$100,000

UAB Colorado State Utah

$50,000 $0 2000

2001

2002

2003

Note: Virginia Tech data not consistently available for reporting

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

RESEARCH PERFORMANCE INDEX (RPI)

Definition:

As reported in the High Impact Universities pilot study designed to benchmark the research output or performance of the worldâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s top univesities involving over 1,000 universities and 5,000 faculty. This variable is based on the calculation of a g-value index value representing the quality and consistency of publication or research output. This value is between 0 and 1 comprised of equal contributions from all faculties and is interpreted as an indication of the comprehensiveness or all around relative performance of a universities. The actual RPI value is an indication of performance relative to a dream team comprising the best faculties of all the universities in the world. The RPI value is calculated following a three-step process for each university (1-calculate the g-index for each faculty; 2-normalize the g-index for each faculty by that of the highest globally performing faculty; 3-average the normalized faculty indices for final value).

PUBLIC AAUs

Source:

High Impact Universities, in affiliation with the University of Western Australia

Type: USF

USF System & Public AAU Institutions Research Performance Index (RPI) 2010 USF & Public AAU Institutions Research Performance Index (RPI), 2010

UCLA UC Berkeley Michigan Washington UC San Diego Minnesota Wisconsin-Madison Penn State UNC Chapel Hill Pittsburgh Ohio State Maryland, College Park UT Austin UC Davis Arizona Michigan State Virginia Illinois, Urb-Ch Florida UC Irvine Rutgers Georgia Tech UC Santa Barbara Iowa Colorado Indiana Purdue Texas A&M Stony Brook USF System USF Iowa State Buffalo Missouri Oregon Kansas Nebraska

4* 5 6 7 10 12 18 20 26 31 32 34 35 38 39 41 43 48 50 51 52 56 59 64 66 69 74 85 103 110 115 138 152 224 260 268

0.0 * data represents international ranking

0.3709

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

Research Performance Impact

0.6

0.7

0.8

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF System & Florida Research Universities USF & Florida Research Universities Performance Index (RPI), 2010 ResearchResearch Performance Index (RPI) 2010 Florida

USF

110

Miami

113

FSU

150

0.3709

Mean UCF

299

FIU

433

FAU

485

0.0

0.1

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

& Public AAU Institutions USF SystemUSF & Public AAU Institutions Research Performance Index (RPI), 2010 Research Performance Index (RPI) 2010 Highest Q3 Mean Q1 USF

0.3709

Lowest 0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

USF System & Prospects AAU Prospects USF & AAU Research ResearchPerformance PerformanceIndex Index(RPI), (RPI)2010 2010 ASU

Utah

Cincinnati

Illinois, Chicago

105

USF

110

0.3709

Mean NC State

134

VA Tech

163

Georgia

168

Colorado State

201

UAB

258

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

POSTDOCTORAL APPOINTEES

PUBLIC AAUs

AAU Phase II Indicator Definition:

Source:

The number of postdoctoral appointees per institution reported via the NSF Survey on Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering as reported by the Top American Research Universities (TARU). Postdoctoral appointees reported in the 2009 report were for Fall 2007.

NSF Survey of Graduate Students & Postdoctorates in Science & Engineering

Type:

AAU, Carnegie, NSF, TARU

USF SystemAAU & Public AAU Institutions USF & Public Institutions Postdoctoral Appointees, Fall 2008 Postdoctoral Appointees, Fall 2008 UC Berkeley UC San Diego UCLA Washington Pittsburgh UC Davis Wisconsin-Madison UNC Chapel Hill Minnesota Florida Ohio State Michigan Virginia Illinois, Urb-Ch Penn State Purdue Texas A&M Michigan State Iowa Arizona Buffalo UC Irvine Rutgers Iowa State Maryland, College Park USF Georgia Tech Kansas UT Austin Missouri Stony Brook UC Santa Barbara Nebraska Oregon

NATIONAL PEERS

231

USF Postdoctoral Appointees Fall 2009: 261

200

Note: Indiana and Colorado data not available for 2008.

400

600

800

Total Postdoctoral Appointees

1000

1200

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USFUSF & Florida Research University Peers & Florida Research Universities PostdoctoralAppointees Appointees(Fall), (Fall),2000 2000- 2008 - 2008 Postdoctoral 600

500 400 300

Miami FSU

200

Mean

USF

100

UCF FIU FAU

0 2000

2001

2002

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USFUSF & Public AAU Institutions & Public AAU Institutions Postdoctoral Appointees (Fall), 2000 - 2008 Postdoctoral Appointees (Fall), 2000 - 2008

1600 1400

AAU High

1200 1000 800

Public AAU 75%

600

AAU Mean

400

USF & Public AAU 25%

200

AAU Low

0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF & AAU Prospects USF & AAU Prospects Postdoctoral Appointees (Fall), 2000 - 2008 Postdoctoral Appointees (Fall), 2000 - 2008 400 350

Utah

300

Cincinnati Colorado State NC State Mean

250

USF

Illinois, Chicago UAB Arizona State U of Georgia VA Tech

200 150 100 50 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

NON-FACULTY RESEARCHERS WITH DOCTORATES Definition:

Non-faculty research staff include all doctoral scientists and engineers who are involved principally in research activities but are not considered either postdoctoral appointees or members of the regular faculty.

PUBLIC AAUs

Source:

WebCASPAR, NSF Survey of Graduate Students & Postdoctoral Appointees in Science & Engineering

Type:

AAU, Carnegie, NSF, TARU USF System includes all member institutions (USF, USF St. Petersburg, USF Sarasota-Manatee, USF Polytechnic). USF refers to the campus located in Tampa which includes USF Health and the College of Marine Science.

USF System & Public AAU Institutions Nonfaculty Researchers withInstitutions Doctorates, Fall 2008 USF System & Public AAU Nonfaculty Researchers with Doctorates, Fall 2008 Wisconsin-Madison Minnesota Arizona Ohio State Iowa UC Irvine UNC Chapel Hill Michigan Kansas Texas A&M Illinois Urb-Ch Washington Seattle Pittsburgh UC San Diego

AAU PROSPECTS

Rutgers

UT Austin USF

112 112

Penn State Indiana UC Santa Barbara Nebraska Virginia

NATIONAL PEERS

Michigan State Colorado Buffalo Purdue Missouri

USF System Non-Faculty Researchers with Doctorates

Oregon Georgia Tech

Fall 2009: 164

Iowa State UCLA 0

100

200

300

400

500

Total Non-Faculty Researchers with Doctorates Note: Stony Brook, UC Davis, Florida, Maryland-College Park and UC Berkeley data not available

600

700

800

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE METRICS

250

INPUT/OUTPUT MEASURES

200

USF& Florida & Florida Research Universities USF System Research Institutions Nonfaculty Researchers with Doctorates (Fall), (Fall), 2000 -2000 2008- 2008 Nonfaculty Researchers with Doctorates Miami

150

USF

100

Mean

FSU FAU UCF

0 2000

2001

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Note: FIU, UF data not available

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF System & Public AAU Institutions Nonfaculty Researchers with Doctorates (Fall), 2000 - 2008 Nonfaculty Researchers with Doctorates (Fall), 2000 - 2008

800 700

AAU High

600 500 400 300 200

Public AAU 75% Mean

USF

100

Public AAU 25% AAU Low

0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Note: Stony Brook, UC Davis, Florida, Maryland-College Park and UC Berkeley data not available

USFSystem System&&AAU AAUProspects Prospects USF Nonfaculty NonfacultyResearchers Researcherswith withDoctorates Doctorates(Fall), (Fall),2000 2000- -2008 2008

2002

450

Illinois, Chicago

400 350 300 250

Colorado State

200

Mean Tech

150

USF

100

UAB Utah Cincinnati Georgia

50 0 2000

2001

Note: ASU, NC State data not available

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

INVENTION DISCLOSURES RECEIVED

Definition:

The number of invention disclosures received in a given year as reported by the Association of University Technology Managers in the annual Licensing Survey.

Source: AUTM

Type: USF

USF & Public AAU Institutions USF System & Public AAU Institutions Invention Disclosures Received, 2008 Invention Disclosures Received, 2008 UC System Wisconsin-Madison Illinois, Urb-Ch Washington Georgia Tech Michigan Florida SUNY System Pittsburgh Colorado Purdue Texas A&M System Minnesota

AAU PROSPECTS

Virginia

Nebraska UT Austin Indiana Penn State Ohio State

139

USF USF System

NATIONAL PEERS

Missouri System

Maryland, College Park UNC Chapel Hill Arizona Rutgers Michigan State Iowa State

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

Iowa Kansas Oregon 0

200

400

600

800

1000

Total Invention Disclosures

1200

1400

1600

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF System Florida &Research UniversityUniversities Peers USF&System Florida Research Invention Disclosures Received, 2000 2008 Invention Disclosures Received, 2000 - 2008

350 300

250 200 150

USF

100

Mean UCF Miami FSU

FAU FIU

0 2000

2001

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System & Public AAU Institutions USF System & Public AAU Institutions Invention Disclosures Received, 2000 - 2008 Invention Disclosures Received, 2000 - 2008

1600

AAU High

1400 1200 1000 800 600 400

Public AAU 75% Mean

200

USF

Public AAU 25% AAU Low

0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System AAU Prospects USF System & AAU&Prospects Invention Disclosures Received, Invention Disclosures Received, 2000 - 2000 2008 - 2008

250 200

Utah VA Tech

150

NC State ASU

USF

Mean Cincinnati Georgia UAB Colorado State

100 50 0 2000

2001

2002

Note: Illinois-Chicago data missing/not available

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

TOTAL PATENTS ISSUED

PUBLIC AAUs

Definition:

The number of U.S. patents issued during the period indicated as reported by the Association of University Technology Managers in the annual Licensing Survey.

Source: AUTM

Type: USF

USF &&Public USF System PublicAAU AAUInstitutions Institutions Total Patents Issued, 2008 Total Patents Issued, 2008 UC System Wisconsin-Madison Michigan Washington Illinois, Urb-Ch Florida Michigan State Georgia Tech SUNY System Penn State Minnesota Rutgers

AAU PROSPECTS

Pittsburgh

USF USF System Texas A&M System Colorado Iowa State UT Austin Purdue Iowa

NATIONAL PEERS

Maryland, College Park

Missouri System Arizona UNC Chapel Hill Ohio State Nebraska

USF Total Patents Issued

Virginia Indiana

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

2009: 66 (est.)

Oregon Kansas 0

100

150

Total Patents Issued

200

250

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF System Florida &Research UniversityUniversities Peers USF&System Florida Research Total Patents Issued,Issued, 2000 - 2000 2008 - 2008 Total Patents

90 80 70 60

UCF

USF

30 20

Mean

FSU Miami FAU FIU

0 2000

2001

2002

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System Public &AAU Institutions USF &System Public AAU Institutions Total Issued, Patents 2000 Issued, 2000 - 2008 Total Patents - 2008

350 300 250

AAU High

200 150 100

Public AAU 75% Mean

USF

Public AAU 25% AAU Low

0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

& AAU Prospects USFUSF System & AAU Prospects TotalPatents PatentsIssued, Issued,2000 2000--2008 2008 Total

2003

60 50 40

NC State Utah & Georgia

USF

VA Tech Mean

Arizona State UAB Colorado State Cincinnati

10 0 2000

2001

2002

Note: U.Illinois-Chicago data missing/not available

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

TOTAL LICENSES / OPTIONS EXECUTED

Definition:

The number of licenses or option agreements that were executed in the year for all technologies as reported by the Association of University Technology Managers in the annual Licensing Survey.

Source: AUTM

Type: USF

USF & Public AAU Institutions Total Executed, 2008 USF SystemLicenses/Options & Public AAU Institutions Total Licenses/Options Executed, 2008 Washington UC System Rutgers Michigan Purdue Wisconsin-Madison Florida Illinois, Urb-Ch Virginia Missouri System Minnesota Colorado UNC Chapel Hill

AAU PROSPECTS

Pittsburgh

Iowa State SUNY System UT Austin Georgia Tech Texas A&M System Oregon Arizona

Indiana USF USF System

Nebraska Penn State Michigan State Ohio

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

Iowa Maryland, College Park Kansas 0

100

150

Total Licenses/Options Executed

200

250

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF System & Florida& Research University Peers USF System Florida Research Universities Total Licenses/Options Executed, Total Licenses/Options Executed, 2000 2000 - 2008- 2008

70 60 50 40

USF

30 20

Mean FSU UCF Miami FAU FIU

10 0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USFUSF System & Public AAUAAU Institutions System & Public Institutions Licenses/Options Executed, - 2008 TotalTotal Licenses/Options Executed, 20002000 - 2008

350 300 250

AAU High

200 150 100

Public AAU 75% AAU Mean Public AAU 25%

USF

AAU Low

0 2000

2001

140

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF&System & AAU Prospects USF AAU Prospects Total Licenses/Options Executed, Total Licenses/Options Executed, 2000 2000 - 2008- 2008

2002

Georgia

120 100 80

Utah NC State

Mean ASU

Colorado State

USF

Cincinnati VA Tech UAB

0 2000

2001

2002

Note:Illinois, Chicago data missing/not available

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

CUMULATIVE ACTIVE LICENSES

Definition:

The cumulative number of actice licenses as reported by the Association of University Technology Managers in the annual Licensing Survey.

Source: AUTM

Type: USF

USF & Public AAU Institutions Cumulative ActiveAAU Licenses, 2008 USF System & Public Institutions Cumulative Active Licenses, 2008 UC System Washington Seattle Minnesota Wisconsin-Madison Iowa State Rutgers SUNY System Texas A&M System Florida Georgia Tech Virginia Illinois, Urb-Ch Michigan

AAU PROSPECTS

UNC Chapel Hill

Michigan State Iowa Indiana UT Austin Pittsburgh Arizona

NATIONAL PEERS

Maryland, College Park

Ohio State Nebraska Penn State

121

USF System Colorado

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

Missouri System Oregon Kansas 0 Note: Data for Purdue was not available for 2008.

500

1000

1500

Cumulative Active Licenses

2000

2500

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF System Florida&Research UniversityUniversities Peers USF&System Florida Research Cumulative Licenses, Cumulative Active Active Licenses, 2000 -2000 2008- 2008

450 400

350 300 250 200 150

USF

100

Mean FSU Miami UCF FAU FIU

50 0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF System & Public& Public AAU Institutions USF System AAU Institutions Cumulative Licenses, Cumulative Active Active Licenses, 2000 - 2000 2008 - 2008

2000

AAU High

1500

1000

500

Public AAU 75% AAU Mean Public AAU 25%

USF

AAU Low

0 2000

2001

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Note:Data for Purdue was not available for 2008, in turn it was not included in summary calculations.

USF System AAU Prospects USF&System & AAU Prospects Cumulative Active Licenses, 2000 - 2008 Cumulative Active Licenses, 2000 - 2008

2002

800 700

NC State Georgia

600 500 400 300

Mean UAB Utah

200

VA Tech

USF

100

Cincinnati ASU Colorado State

0 2000

2001

2002

Note:Illinois, Chicago data missing/not available

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

LICENSE INCOME RECEIVED

Definition:

This revenue includes several fees, payments and royalties as reported and specified by the Association of University Technology Managers in the annual Licensing Survey.

Source: AUTM

Type: USF

USF & Public AAU Institutions USF License System & PublicReceived, AAU Institutions Income 2008 License Income Received, 2008 UC System Minnesota Washington Seattle Wisconsin-Madison Florida Michigan Iowa SUNY System Texas A&M System UT Austin Iowa State Rutgers Illinois, Urb-Ch

AAU PROSPECTS

Oregon

Missouri System Pittsburgh Colorado Indiana Michigan State Virginia Purdue

UNC Chapel Hill Nebraska Georgia Tech Ohio State

$1,831

USF System Maryland, College Park

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

Penn State Kansas Arizona $0

$30,000

$60,000

$90,000

$120,000

$150,000

License Income Received iin Thousands

Thousands

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF System Florida &Research UniversityUniversities Peers USF&System Florida Research LicenseLicense IncomeIncome Received, 2000 2008 Received, 2000 - 2008

$70,000,000 $60,000,000

UF ($52m)

$50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000

Mean ($9m)

USF ($1.8m)

FSU ($1.25m) Miami ($526k) UCF ($327k) FAU ($199k) FIU ($9k)

$10,000,000 $0 2000

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

USF&System & Public AAU Institutions USF System Public AAU Institutions LicenseReceived, Income Received, 2000 - 2008 License Income 2000 - 2008

$300,000,000 $250,000,000 $200,000,000 $150,000,000

AAU High

$100,000,000 Mean ($20.9m) Public AAU 75% ($17.6m) Public AAU 25% ($2.6m) USF ($1.8m) AAU Low ($690,000)

$50,000,000 $0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

& AAU Prospects USF &USF AAUSystem Prospects LicenseReceived, Income Received, 2000 - 2008 License Income 2000 - 2008

2001

$25,000,000

Utah Georgia

$20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 Mean UAB

$5,000,000

VA Tech

USF

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

Colorado State ASU Cincinnati NC State

$0 2000

2001

2002

Note: U.Illinois-Chicago data missing/not available

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

STARTUPS INITIATED

PUBLIC AAUs

Definition:

Source:

The number of new companies initiated in a given year as reported by the Association of University Technology Managers in the annual Licensing Survey.

AUTM

Type: USF

USF & Public AAU Institutions Startups Initiated, 2008 USF System & Public AAU Institutions Startups Initiated, 2008

UC System Florida Michigan Colorado Purdue Illinois, Urb-Ch UT Austin SUNY System Washington Georgia Tech Wisconsin-Madison Missouri System Arizona

USF USF System

UNC Chapel Hill Ohio Stat Pittsburgh Nebraska Maryland, College Park Michigan State Virginia

Kansas Rutgers Iowa State Indiana Minnesota Texas A&M System

FLORIDA RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES

Penn State Oregon Iowa 0

Number of Startups Initiated

Florida Atlantic University Florida International University Florida State University University of Central Florida University of Florida* University of Miami

*AAU member

USF System & Florida Research University Peers USF System & Florida Research Universities Startups Initiated, 2000 - 2000 2008 - 2008 Startups Initiated,

12 10 8 6

USF

Mean FSU

UCF

0 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

FAU Miami FIU

USF System Public&AAU Institutions USF & System Public AAU Institutions StartupsStartups Initiated,Initiated, 2000 - 2008 2000 - 2008

AAU High

50 40 30 20 10

Public AAU 75% Mean

USF

Public AAU 20% AAU Low

0 2000

2001

2002

2003

* AAU Indicator - Phase I ** AAU Indicator - Phase II

2005

2006

2007

USF System & AAU Prospects USF & AAU Prospects Startups Initiated, 2000 -2000 2008- 2008 Startups Initiated,

2004

2008

Utah

18 16 14 12 10 8 6

USF & NC State Mean VA Tech, Colorado State Georgia UAB & ASU Cincinnati

4 0 2000

2001

2002

Note:Illinois, Chicago data missing/not available

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008