Skip to main content

The Emissions Gap Report 2015

Page 32

Parties

2020 Pledge Case (based on official data)

Current Policy Trajectory (based on official data)

Current Policy Trajectory (based on independent estimates) 24

Mitigation pledge and current policy trajectory details

Republic of Korea

550a (Republic of Korea, 2015)

N/A

745-755b (CAT, 2015) 585-620b (den Elzen et al., 2015)

Baseline scenario pledge

545a (Republic of Korea, 2014)

2020 Pledge Case of 550a is calculated from INDC (Republic of Korea, 2015) baseline of 783

Russian Federation

2 515b (Government of Russia, 2014)

2 410b (Government of Russia, 2014)

2 600b (CAT, 2015) 2 295-2 375b (den Elzen et al., 2015)

Base year pledge

South Africa

585a (Department of Environmental Affairs, 2011a, 2011b)

N/A

730b (CAT, 2015) 560-885b (PBL, 2015)

Baseline scenario pledge

United States of America

5 145a (Biennial Report, 2013)

5 920a (Biennial Report, 2013)

6 360-6 600b (CAT, 2015) 5 445-6 170a (den Elzen et al., 2015)27

Base year pledge

2020 Pledge Case reflects 25% reduction calculated based on national inventory data (Government of Russia, 2014)

Current Policy Trajectory (official data) is from the ‘with measures’ scenario in the Biennial Report (2013). The USA considers that it has moved onto the ‘with additional measures’ trajectory, with a range of 4 893-5 591 MtCO2e for 2020

No 2020 pledge Argentina

No pledge

No pledge

380-480b (CAT, 2015)

Saudi Arabia

No pledge

No pledge

645b (CAT, 2015)

Turkey

No pledge

No pledge

655b (CAT, 2015) 485-690b (den Elzen et al., 2015)

Notes: a Figures including LULUCF b Figures excluding LULUCF * China and India have GHG intensity targets based on the ratio of GHG emissions to GDP. For consistency, we have converted these to absolute emission numbers based on the official documentation cited above, but a determination of whether each country has achieved its pledge should be based on intensity rather than absolute emissions. Estimates are rounded to the nearest 5 MtCO2e.

27 A suite of additional studies (Rhodium Group, 2014; Belenky, 2015; Hausker et al., 2015) finds that US emissions in 2020 could range from 5 087-5 844 MtCO2e incl. LULUCF if the Administration implements further regulations consistent with its Climate Action Plan.

10

The Emissions Gap Report 2015 –The importance of pre-2020 action


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
The Emissions Gap Report 2015 by United Nations Publications - Issuu