PERU OIL SPILL
AGED INFRASTRUCTURE, A TSUNAMI AND POOR MANAGEMENT COMBINE TO CAUSE AN MAJOR ENVIRONMENTAL INCIDENT.
In the early hours of 15 January, a rupture occurred in an underwater pipeline which sent crude oil gushing into the ocean around the offshore buoy through which the Italian-flagged tanker Mare Doricum was discharging to La Pampilla, Peru’s biggest oil refinery operated by Repsol, just north of the capital, Lima. (see map below).
for the spill, said Manuel Pulgar Vidal, the country’s former environment minister and now global leader of climate and energy at WWF. However Peru has a poor record of holding big business to account for pollution, he says. “Expectations for getting [decent] compensation are very low.” Peru accuses Repsol of delayed response to the spillage. It say the contingency plan for the spill was only initiated the day after it occurred. This is denied by the company, which said in a statement that it “activated its contingency plan and communicated the facts to the relevant authorities … the same night as the ship’s accident”. Through the State Prosecutor, the Government have barred four Repsol officials from leaving the country while it investigates whether the oil company properly maintained its system of underwater pipelines that feed the refinery.
The spillage hit, as coastal spills often do, local communities, local fishing communities (estimated as 2000 fishermen) and the sensitive marine ecosystems that sit along this coastline. The incident has not shown the industry in a good light and has raised the question of how environmental crimes should be punished during a time of climate crisis and catastrophic wildlife loss. Currently Repsol, the captain of the tanker and the Peruvian state all blame one another. Under Peru’s strict liability law, Repsol is ultimately responsible 18
While the oil company initially said a tsunami created by the eruption of a volcano in Tonga had triggered the spill, it later blamed the Mare Doricum, which it claims shifted its position during the oil discharge, allegations which the tanker company has denied. The ship has been seized by the Peruvian authorities and the vessel’s Italian captain, Giacomo Pisani, has been included in the investigation. Pisani alleges that there were a series of irregularities in the discharge process and claimed the company’s containment barriers were not long enough. Assigning blame has been further complicated because the Peruvian navy did not issue a tsunami warning after the Tonga volcanic eruption, unlike
neighbouring Ecuador and Chile. While the argument over responsibility for the spill continues, the environmental and social consequences ripple outwards. The UN’s special rapporteur on toxics and human rights, Marcos Orellana, who spent a week in Peru last month, says the slow reaction of the company and the authorities “aggravated the impacts” on the environment and the people who depend on it for food. The effects on coastal fishing communities in Aucallama, about 30 miles north of the spill, have been overwhelming, as the tide of viscous crude clogs up the rock pools and cliffside crags where they catch crab, octopus, sea bass and grunt. Fishing came to an abrupt halt, says Marcelo Muñoz, 60, who has been making a living by casting a hook and line from the cliffside since he was 12. The fish were so plentiful that he could earn more than $50 a day selling directly to the seaside restaurants serving ceviche to summertime beachgoers. Now Muñoz and nearly 50 fellow artisanal fishers rely on food donations, which are shared in an “olla común”, a makeshift soup kitchen flanked by rows of empty clapboard eateries, all deserted during the busiest months of the year. They are among about 2,000 people living off fishing who have been affected along a 50mile stretch of coastline, says
