89
J o h n W. B o y e r
of Chicago. In March 1954, Kimpton went before key members of the board of trustees with a plan to increase the size of the College from its then 1,350 students to 5,000 students by the mid-1960s, thus making the College 50 percent of the total University population. Even this number was something of a compromise, since Kimpton privately stated to his closest colleagues that he really wanted 6,000 undergraduates on the quadrangles. Kimpton argued that [t]he enrollment is really the key to the whole problem. The faculty, including all assistants and research men, number 1,200 at the present time with an enrollment of 4,800, which means roughly four to one in faculty ratio — better than the finest private schools in the country. This points the way to increase enrollment without increasing sharply any operation expenses or increasing the faculty. One thousand more students would produce $700,000 in student fee income and would help eliminate the deficit we are discussing.123 It was evident that the University’s leadership hoped that a larger College would benefit the University financially in the short term, but in even more significant ways over the longer run. Nor were fiscal issues absent in the many deliberations on the curriculum, for Kimpton’s ECUE Report of 1958 explicitly invoked the specter of a larger College as one of the justifications for its proposed changes, arguing that “[t]he undergraduate student body is expected to grow substantially during the next few years.” 123. “Planning Conference, March 4–7, 1954,” Fifth Session, Kimpton Administration, Box 252, folder 1. Kimpton expressed his preference “for a student body in which there would be 6,000 undergraduates and 4,000 graduates.”