Table 2 NOC-specific questions
1 POINT
N.A
0 POINTS
The performance of NOC groups was already partially analysed in the previous sections (see Diagrams 7 and 12). Diagram 25 summarises the comparative performance of each group for Sections 1 to 3 (including reporting on domestic operations).
*Listed NOCs **NOCs with listed subsidiaries ***non-listed NOCs
NOCs ACTIVITIES
GROUPS OF NOCS – RESULTS BY QUESTIONNAIRE SECTION
SUPPLIES TO GOVERNMENTS
PROCUREMENT
LICENSING CRITERIA
LICENSES
Statoil*
• Listed NOCs achieved the highest average scores in all sections: 37 per cent on reporting on anti-corruption programmes, 79 on organisational disclosure, 20 on international and 77 on domestic country-level disclosure. • On average, NOCs with listed subsidiaries scored: 24 per cent on reporting on anti-corruption programmes, 48 on organisational disclosure, 0 on international and 65 on domestic country-level disclosure.
Pemex*** Sinopec** Sonangol***
• On average, non-listed NOCs scored: 11 per cent on reporting on anti-corruption programmes, 44 on organisational disclosure, 3 on international and 35 on domestic country-level disclosure.
Petrobras* Rosneft* Inpex*
In summary, listed NOCs outperformed other groups in all sections, which is most likely related to higher reporting standards required for publicly listed companies.
SOCAR*** PDVSA*** NNPC*** PetroChina*
Diagram 25 NOC groups - comparative performance in different sections
ONGC* Gazprom* Petronas**
2.0
reporting on anti-corruption programmes
Performance is measured as relative to the NOC average (NOC average=1)
KazMG** SaudiAramco***
1.0
QatarPet***
LISTED NOCs
NIOC*** KPC***
country-level disclosure domestic
organisational disclosure 0.0
NOCs WITH LISTED SUBSIDIARIES
GEPetrol*** Sonatrach*** SNPC***
NON-LISTED NOCs
CNPC** CNOOC**
AVERAGE FOR ALL NOCs
46
Transparency International
Promoting Revenue Transparency
country-level disclosure international
47