316
Thota Srinu, S.Girish, Monica.T & B.Dhanraj
Comparison of Results with other Literature Works Results of the present work are same as the other literature work results. Validation of software is done Table 2: Comparison of Present Results with Other Literature Works for Single Cylinder (Laminar Flow) "# (Drag Coefficient)
St (Strouhal Number)
Present work
1.39
0.167
Meneghini et al.[10]
1.37
0.165
Kang[15]
1.33
0.165
Case
Drag Coefficient for Diamond Arrangement (00 Angle) Table 3: Values of Drag Coefficient for Diamond Arrangement (00 Angle) at Different Spacing Ratios L/D
"#$
"#% &"#
"#&
Single Cylinder
1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
0.618 0.489 0.528 0.630 0.680 0.738
0.838 0.842 0.940 1.13 1.24 1.14
0.246 0.370 0.143 0.320 0.089 0.099
0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98
Figure 13: Variation of Drag Coefficient ("# ) with Spacing Ratio (L/D) for Diamond Arrangement (00 Angle)
Impact Factor (JCC): 6.8765
NAAS Rating: 3.11