6
B. R Sharma & Kabita Nath
Figure 4: The Graph of C against η M=0.1, K=0.5, = 2.0, = 1.0, n =0.1, A = 0.5, Pr = 0.7, Sc = 0.3, =0.0001 and Up = 1 for various Values of ϕ
Figure 5: The Graph of C against η M=0.1, K=0.5, = 2.0, = 1.0, n =0.1, A = 0.5, Sc = 0.3, ϕ = 1, =0.0001 and Up = 1 for Various Values of Pr
Figure 6: The Graph of C against η M=0.1, K=0.5, = 2.0, = 1.0, n =0.1, Sc = 0.3, Pr = 0.7, ϕ = 1, =0.0001 and Up = 1 for various Values of A Finally, the effects of the rate of heat and mass transfer are shown in Table 1. The behaviour of these parameters is self – evident from the Table 1 and hence any further discussion about them seems to be redundant. Table 1: Numerical Values of M=0.1, K=0.5, = 2.0, = 1.0, n =0.1, A = 0.5, Pr = 0.7, ϕ = 1, =0.0001 and Up = 1 Sc 0.3 0.5 0.7 1 1 1 3.5256 3.4512 3.3879 0 0 0 4.8264 4.6559 4.5307 1 1 1 -1.2569 -1.2569 -1.2569 1 1 1
M=0.1, K=0.5, = 2.0, = 1.0, Sc =0.3, A = 0.5, Pr = 0.7, ϕ = 1, =0.0001 and Up = 1 n 0.1 0.9 1.5 1 1 1 3.5256 3.5256 3.5256 0 0 0 4.8264 4.5742 4.5030 1 1 1 -1.2569 -1.2569 -1.2569 1 1 1
M=0.1, K=0.5, = 2.0, = 1.0, n =0.1, A = 0.5, Pr = 0.7, ϕ = 1, Sc=0.3 and Up = 1 0.001 1 3.5258 0 4.8271 1 -1.2569 1
0.045 1 3.5369 0 4.8627 1 -1.2569 1
0.094 1 3.5498 0 4.9039 1 -1.2569 1