The Raging Patriot

Raging Patriot The

TheSILENCE of theFEMINISTS and PROGRESSIVES

Real News Real Patriots by

Real News Real Patriots by

Raging Patriot The Our Story

The mainstream media was once viewed as a trusted source of information where millions of Americans could be educated on events ranging from domestic to international affairs, in fact, CNN still claims to be “the most trusted name in news”. Unfortunately, we now live in an era of lies, corruption and deception. The mainstream media has become a tool of the left to push radical propaganda for the Democrat establishment; this is what helped lead to the creation of what has now become The Raging Patriot!

Our story begins back in January of 2020, where Co-Founders Nicholas and Michael started with an idea that was aimed at allowing them to reach their base without the fear of censorship. Prior to this idea, both Nicholas and Michael had amassed hundreds of thousands of followers on social media, where they both proudly spread the TRUTH to millions of patriots. However, as previously stated, they both suffered the same consequences of Big Tech censorship resulting in limited reach and banned pages. Rather than being discouraged by this Un-American form of censorship, it only further ignited their passion to spread the TRUTH.

Fast forward to the beginning of January 2020 and President Trump had just undergone the first Impeachment hoax. After witnessing the united front of lies from the fake media, Michael and Nicholas were determined to do something to address this lost conservative voice in the media. Many ideas and early concepts were discussed and created, and eventually, The Raging Patriot became the news site you see today. Although, this was not without its challenges.

Looking back to the early days of The Raging Patriot, our organization is grateful to have been in a position to hire a talented team during the height of the Covid outbreak when 20 million Americans were out of work.

One thing that both Nicholas and Michael are extremely blessed to have is the team that makes up The Raging Patriot, without them, none of our accomplishments would have been possible. We have come a long way since our founding and we reached millions of patriots in the process, however our job is not completed yet. We set out on a mission to put ‘TRUTH’ back into news and give confidence back in the press, and we plan on continuing to pursue this mission until it is accomplished.

Should the West Seek an Off-Ramp in Ukraine?

How does the war in Ukraine end?

BY BEN SHAPIRO

This is precisely the question no one is supposed to ask these days. The supposition by our thought leaders seems to be that if we keep up the pressure on Vladimir Putin in Ukraine, he’ll fold and go home; his threats to use tactical nuclear weapons on the battlefield are nothing more than saber-rattling. He will then retrench on the domestic front, resolidify his power and continue throwing his prospective enemies from third-story windows.

Perhaps that’s actually the best-case scenario. Because if President Joe Biden gets his wish – if Putin is indeed ousted from power in Russia – what would follow could easily be even worse than Putin: the

Russian public remains highly supportive of aggressive foreign action to expand the “empire”; other than the military, there are no well-organized or powerful groups in Russia, and Putin does have an inner circle of possible successors who are, if anything, more antiWest even than he is. If none of those successors take the fore, the possibility of internecine warfare akin to Syria isn’t totally out of the realm of possibility either – and that, in a country armed with a massive and aging nuclear arsenal. Then there’s the other possibility: that Putin is serious, and that if he sees his mission in Ukraine failing, he actually unleashes nuclear weapons. Most observers

thought Putin was saber-rattling over his threats to invade Ukraine in the first place; underestimating Putin’s aggressive radicalism now could be foolish. And there are no real plans to deal with Putin unleashing a nuke: while former CIA director David Petraeus has suggested that America would respond by “leading a NATO, a collective effort, that would take out every Russian conventional force that we can see and identify on the battlefield in Ukraine and also in Crimea and every ship in the Black Sea,” that could also lead Putin to escalate even further, perhaps even trying to directly threaten a civilian center in NATO territory with nuclear weapons.

In November 1939, the Soviet Union invaded Finland, attempting to install a puppet communist government; the West united in opposition to Soviet intervention, shipping weaponry to the Finns, who bravely stood against the forces of Stalin. The USSR lost at least 126,000 soldiers over the course of the three-and-ahalf-month war but responded in the late going with a massive infusion of troops and a heavy offensive that drove the Finns back on their heels. Faced with the prospect of open war with the Western powers, Stalin signed the Moscow Peace Treaty in March 1940, with the Finns ceding 9% of their territory to Stalin. Was the mutual stand-down the best solution? Should the West have pressed Stalin to the brink in Finland? Perhaps. But the West was facing down Stalin and

Hitler simultaneously. Today, the threat isn’t a second front from a powerful enemy, but the direct threat of nuclear weapons. Henry Kissinger has been publicly excoriated for suggesting that the off-ramp to this conflict will be territorial concessions by Ukraine to Russia – a repeat of the Moscow Peace Treaty. But he may be correct, particularly if the West is unwilling to bear the full economic and military cost of a larger war with Russia – as historian Niall Ferguson writes, “Thus far, the West have given Zelensky and his brave people enough military and economic support to avoid losing. We are not yet giving them enough to win – and the window for victory is not infinite.” In the end, it may be that the least-bad scenario is about simply preventing the worst-case scenario. �

Ben Shapiro, 38, is a graduate of UCLA and Harvard Law School, host of “The Ben Shapiro Show,” and Editor-in-Chief of DailyWire.com. He is a three-time New York Times bestselling author; his latest book is “The Authoritarian Moment: How The Left Weaponized America’s Institutions Against Dissent.” To find out more about Ben Shapiro and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2022 CREATORS.COM

The

Raging Patriot

“...the Russian public remains highly supportive of aggressive foreign action to expand the “empire””

The FTX Dog That Didn’t Bark

BY BEN SHAPIRO

In Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s famous Sherlock Holmes tale, “Silver Blaze”, the detective investigates the case of a murder of a horse trainer. At first, investigators presume that the murderer of the trainer must have been a stranger to him. But Holmes cracks the case with the revelation that a watchdog remained silent the night of the murder – a “curious incident,” as Holmes puts it, if the watchdog had been confronted by a stranger. No, Holmes concludes, the murderer must have been known to the watchdog.

We would do well to keep Holmes’ “curious incident” in mind when discussing the complete meltdown of FTX, the cryptocurrency exchange run by Sam Bankman-Fried, a man who looks like he emerged from a laboratory dedicated to the manufacture of charlatans. Bankman-Fried was, at one point, worth some $26 billion; his exchange was the second largest in the world. But he also bragged about never reading books (“I think, if you wrote a book, you f--ed up, and it should have been a six-paragraph blog post”); he lived in a “polycule” – a polyamorous semi-colony – along with nine of his executives; he wore gym shorts and T-shirts to important company events with Bill Clinton and Tony Blair; he placed at the head of human resources the girlfriend of the director of engineering and as chief operating officer his own intermittent girlfriend and as head of his associated hedge fund yet another intermittent girlfriend.

The red flags were endless. And yet the scam continued.

In the coverage of FTX’s meltdown, many in the media have been rather slow to ask a simple question: why didn’t anybody notice that SBF was one of the most obvious scam artists of all time? Perhaps it’s the insanity of the digital age, in which those fresh out of college can be assessed as billionaires without actually showing a balance sheet. But there’s something else going on here: SBF was a key cog in a political machine dedicated to the proposition that a coalition of like-minded Left-wingers can seize the reins of capitalist enterprise and then work with friends in government to reconstruct the world.

That, after all, was what SBF was publicly attempting to do. He dumped $40 million into the midterm elections in support of Democrats; he donated $5.2 million to then-candidate Joe Biden during the 2020 election cycle. He had pledged the FTX foundation to hand out $1 billion in 2022. He did all of this in the name of supposed “effective altruism,” a philosophy in which Left-wingers seek to use capitalism in order to enrich themselves, then dump the money into favored causes. “I wanted to get rich, not because I like money but because I wanted to give that money to charity,” SBF told one interviewer.

“Effective altruism” is just another iteration of the World Economic Forum-approved “stakeholder capitalism” idea – the idea that CEOs owe their shareholders nothing, but the world at large their time, money and resources. There is a reason that FTX had partnered with WEF – a fact that WEF has now obscured by cleaning its website.

How many scam artists are using such “bluewashing” in order to cover for malfeasance – all the while colluding with government figures to redraw regulations that benefit them? That, after all, was SBF’s biggest scam: He was an advocate of particular types of regulation that benefitted him and used both familial and business connections in order to protect his corporatism.

And that’s the dog that didn’t bark here: Where were the regulators with whom SBF was close? Where were the supposed advocates of “ethical capitalism,” who posit social responsibility but whose friends seem to repeatedly be caught with their fingers in the cookie jar, dating all the way back to Bernie Madoff?

Maybe, just maybe, the problem isn’t with capitalism per se, and its chief admonition caveat emptor, its belief that trust is to be earned rather than granted freely. Maybe the problem is with a cadre of supposed protectors of the public who aren’t out to protect the public at all, but to hobnob with other “change agents” from Bahamian estates while patting themselves on the back for all the good they’re doing. �

Ben Shapiro, 38, is a graduate of UCLA and Harvard Law School, host of “The Ben Shapiro Show,” and Editor-in-Chief of DailyWire.com. He is a three-time New York Times bestselling author; his latest book is “The Authoritarian Moment: How The Left Weaponized America’s Institutions Against Dissent.” To find out more about Ben Shapiro and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2022 CREATORS.COM

“...why didn’t anybody notice that SBF was one of the most obvious scam artists of all time?”

Barack Obama: Still a Racial Incendiary

BY LARRY ELDER

Former President Barack Obama recently gave a speech in which he attacked the critics of “identity politics.” At the June Copenhagen Democracy Summit Obama said: “I have little sympathy for reactionaries who cynically condemn identity politics or cancel culture when really all they’re doing is trying to preserve existing privilege or excuse entrenched injustice, or bigotry. I mean, the original identity politics is racism and sexism and homophobia. That’s nothing if not identity politics, and it’s done a lot more harm than some tweet from an aggrieved liberal.”

“Reactionaries”?

Yes, that would be the same Obama who burst on the national scene by giving a rafter-ringing keynote speech at the Boston 2004 DNC convention where he denounced identity politics. Then-Illinois state Sen. Obama said: “There are those who are preparing to divide us, the spin masters and negative ad peddlers who embrace the politics of anything goes. Well, I say to them tonight, there’s not a liberal America and a conservative America – there’s the United States of America. There’s not a black America and white America and Latino America and Asian America; there’s the United States of America. The pundits like to slice-and-dice our country into red states and

“Obama, as president, peddled

with little evidence

an ever-growing list of race grievances.”

blue states; red states for Republicans, blue states for Democrats. But I’ve got news for them, too. ... We are one people, all of us pledging allegiance to the stars and stripes, all of us defending the United States of America.”

Days before he announced his race to become a Democratic nominee for president in 2008, Obama gave his first “60 Minutes” interview: “60 Minutes” correspondent Steve Kroft: “You think the country’s ready for a black president?”

Obama: “Yes.”

Kroft: “You don’t think it’s going to hold you back?”

Obama: “No. I think if I don’t win this race, it will be because of other factors. It’s going to be because I have not shown to the American people a vision for where the country needs to go that they can embrace.”

At a 2007 speech at Brown Chapel AME church, presidential candidate Obama talked about the black struggle, how much had been achieved and that which remained: “The previous generation, the Moses generation, pointed the way. They took us 90% of the way there. But we still got that 10% in order to cross over to the other side.”

This is the Obama the American people assumed they had hired in November 2008. Hopeful, positive, a liberal Democrat, to be sure, but a black man who could serve, at the very least, as a racial reconciler, keenly aware of how far America has come. When he entered the Oval Office the third week of January 2009, his approval rating approached 70%. A January 2009 ABC News poll found that 58% thought race relations would improve under Obama. But by October 2016, one month before the presidential election, a CNN/ORC poll found 54%

thought race relations (SET ITAL) worsened (END ITAL) under Obama, including 40% of blacks and 57% of whites.

Obama, as president, peddled – with little evidence – an ever-growing list of race grievances. The list included “the Cambridge police acted stupidly”; racism is “still part of our DNA that’s passed on”; “if I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon (Martin)”; holding up Ferguson as a microcosm of racial strife in America; inviting race-hustling incendiary the Rev. Al Sharpton to the White House over 70 times; and embracing the Black Lives Matter movement, an activist organization based on the false narrative of police “systemic racism” against blacks. Obama rarely missed an opportunity to be the conciliator Americans thought him to be. He knows that racism has never been a less significant factor as an obstacle to American success. His very election and reelection stands as a testament to that truth.

Obama won the presidency based on a lie. He entered the presidency as an articulate, even-tempered racial unifier and left as an articulate, even-tempered racial incendiary. Today he plays the race card from his $12 million bunker in Martha’s Vineyard. �

Larry Elder is a best-selling author and nationally syndicated radio talk-show host. To find out more about Larry Elder, or become an “Elderado,” visit www.LarryElder.com. Follow Larry on Twitter @ larryelder. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2022 LAURENCE A. ELDER DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

The

Raging

Protests in Iran: The Silence of the ‘Feminists’ and ‘Progressives’

BY LARRY ELDER

Where are the American feminists and “progressives” when we need them?

You know, the men-versus-women, proabortion types who say things like the reversal of Roe v. Wade represents “men wanting to tell women what to do with their bodies”?

Last month, on Sept. 16, Mahsa Amini, a 22-yearold woman living in Iran, died in a hospital three days after being arrested in Tehran by the state’s morality police known as “Guidance Patrols.” Her “crime”? She showed too much hair underneath her hijab, or headscarf.

The New York Times reported: “The police did not offer an explanation for why Ms. Amini was detained, other than that it involved the hijab rule. Her mother

said in an interview with Iranian news media that her daughter was observing the rules and wearing a long, loose robe. She said Ms. Amini was arrested as she exited the subway with her brother, and that his pleas that they were visitors to the city were ignored.”

According to the BBC: “Eyewitnesses said Mahsa Amini was beaten while inside a police van when she was picked up in Tehran on Tuesday. Police have denied the allegations, saying Ms Amini had ‘suddenly suffered a heart problem.’” However, at least one Iranian judicial official, according to state media, said the woman suffered “multiple fractures ... in the pelvis, head, upper and lower limbs, arms and legs, which indicate that the person was thrown from a height.”

In protest, women in Iran are cutting their hair, with some taking to social media and burning their hijabs.

Two weeks ago, CNN reported: “Protests have swept through more than 40 Iranian cities, including the capital Tehran. Iranian security forces have been cracking down on protesters, with hundreds arrested and at least 41 killed, according to state media. Some human rights organizations say the death toll is as high as 76.”

As for Iran, Human Right Watch states: “Since March 21, 2022, at the beginning of Iranian New Year, Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) has documented 306 executions, 130 of them for drug-related charges and 151 of them based on the Islamic principle of qisas, or ‘retribution in kind’ punishments. Between May 21 and June 21 alone, the group documented 99 executions.”

mother-f---er,” and after the reversal of Roe v. Wade, tweeted, “Reproductive rights are human rights that remain under threat across the country,” tweeted mildly, “I stand in solidarity with the Iran protests as they fight for a woman’s right to bodily autonomy and against police brutality in the wake of the horrifying murder of Mahsa Amini.”

“All the elements to make this an Iranian George Floyd moment are present.”

As for the rest of The Squad, silence. No call by American feminists and progressives for the collapse of the totalitarian government of Iran. No wholesale condemnation of this police state’s mandate that women wear the hijab and face imprisonment for failing to do so, or for failing to wear

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., tweeted: “Solidarity with the courageous women and allies in Iran protesting for their freedom. Mahsa Amini was senselessly murdered by the same patriarchal and autocratic forces repressing women the world over. The right to choose belongs to us all, from hijabs to reproductive care.” And Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., put out a statement: “Those responsible for her death should be held accountable and the world should be united in fighting against the policing of what women wear and how they show up in society. Banning the hijab is not much different than forcing one on women. Religious beliefs are personal and should never be imposed on anyone. (May God have mercy upon her soul).”

Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., who once said about President Donald Trump, “We’re going to impeach this

it “correctly.” No plea that the Biden administration, at the very least, publicly support the Iranian protesters demonstrating the same kind of courage as have the Ukrainians following the Russian invasion.

Talk about “men telling women what to do with their bodies”! All the elements to make this an Iranian George Floyd moment are present. But the relative silence by The Squad has been deafening.. �

Larry Elder is a best-selling author and nationally syndicated radio talk-show host. To find out more about Larry Elder, or become an “Elderado,” visit www.LarryElder.com. Follow Larry on Twitter @ larryelder. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2022 LAURENCE A. ELDER DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

Raging

What About Democratic

‘Election Deniers’?

BY LARRY ELDER

After the recent annual Conservative Political Action Conference convention in Dallas, CNN published a video with the following headline: “Election deniers take over CPAC after primary victories.” In a recent appearance on CBS, Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., who voted to impeach former President Donald Trump and serves on the House Jan. 6 committee, said: “The only thing we need for democracy to survive is the knowledge that you can vote, that that vote counts, and we live with the winner and loser. If half the country believes that that wasn’t accurate, you can’t expect democracy to survive.”

Where was this concern about “election deniers” when Democrats have complained about “stolen” elections?

In 2018, Democrat Stacey Abrams claimed she lost her Georgia gubernatorial race due to voter “suppression.” In her speech after the election was called for her opponent, she refused to concede. Three years later, she told CNN that her opponent “won under the rules of the game at the time, but the game was rigged against the voters of Georgia.” A USA Today fact check said, “There is little empirical evidence (opponent Georgia then-Secretary of State Brian) Kemp stole the election.

Former Vice President Al Gore, in a Washington Post interview two years after his presidential defeat to George W. Bush, said, “I believe that if everyone in Florida who tried to vote had had his or her vote counted properly, that I would have won.”

In January 2001 several House Democrats voted against certifying the election results of 2000. Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., said in a joint session of Congress: “The objection is in writing, and I do not care that it is not signed by a member of the Senate (as is necessary to force a Senate vote on the challenge.)”

Had Ohio, in 2004, gone to Democrat John Kerry, he would have become president. President George W. Bush carried it 51% to 49%, a margin of about 100,000 votes. But Jan. 6 Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., on Jan. 6, 2005, joined 30 other House Democrats and Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., in refusing to certify Ohio’s presidential election results, claiming “voter suppression” in addition to arguing, also with no basis in fact, that the Diebold voting machines were manipulated to reelect Bush. The Senate voted 74-1 against the Democrats’ challenge. Though Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., voted against the challenge, he praised Boxer in 2005 for making it: “I thank her for doing that, because it gives members an opportunity once again on a bipartisan basis to look at a challenge that we face not just in the last election in one state, but in many states.”

Hillary Clinton consistently calls the presidential election of 2016 “stolen” and described thenPresident Trump as “illegitimate.” Former President Jimmy Carter said in 2019: “I think a full investigation would show that Trump didn’t actually win the election in 2016. He lost the election, and he was put into office because the Russians interfered on his behalf.” New York Attorney General Letitia James said she

“will never be afraid to challenge this illegitimate president.”

About the 2016 election, former Obama Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson testified under oath that, while the Russians tried to manipulate voting machines, there is no evidence that a single vote tally was changed. As to the effect of Russian interference, Johnson said that there’s no way of knowing whether the interference affected public opinion or the election result.

Nevertheless a 2018 YouGov poll found 66% of Democrats believe that Russia changed vote tallies to elect Trump in 2016. A 2018 Gallup poll found 78% of Democrats believe that Russian interference in 2016 “changed the outcome of the election” in favor of Trump.

About the 2020 election, CNN politics editor Chris Cillizza wrote: “76% of self-identified Republicans in a new national Quinnipiac University poll. That’s the number of Republicans who said they believe there was ‘widespread fraud in the 2020 election.’”

As noted, a greater percentage of Democrats, 78%, consider 2016’s presidential election to have been “stolen” compared to 76% of Republicans who feel likewise about 2020.

Now what?. �

Larry Elder is a best-selling author and nationally syndicated radio talk-show host. To find out more about Larry Elder, or become an “Elderado,” visit www.LarryElder.com. Follow Larry on Twitter @ larryelder. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2022 LAURENCE A. ELDER DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

Raging

The Race-Obsessed L.A. City Council

BY LARRY ELDER

In a leaked tape, three members of the all-Democrat (plus one independent) Los Angeles City Council, along with a labor leader – all Latino – used racist, homophobic, anti-white, anti-Asian and even antiMexican slurs as they plotted to redistrict the city council to increase “Latino power.”

LA is approximately 50% Latino, but Latinos control “just” 30% of the 15 council seats. For the party of diversity, inclusion and equality, this is a problem.

Worse, blacks, though less than 10% of the population, occupy 20% of the council seats. The three black council members preside over districts that are either majority Latino or where they make up

the largest plurality. How dare Latino voters vote for black politicians!

Leading the parade of invectives was since-resigned City Council President Nury Martinez, herself a daughter of Mexican immigrants and whose rise in city politics was aided by a black mentor politician. Martinez – who has called President Donald Trump “racist” – and the others directed much of their wrath against a fellow councilmember, Mike Bonin, a white man with an adopted black child.

They accused Bonin, whom Martinez said “thinks he’s f---ing black,” of using his black child as an “accessory.” Councilman Kevin de Leon said Bonin

treated the child like a “Louis Vuitton bag” and Martinez described the boy as being “like a monkey.”

As for Bonin, a gay man, Martinez called him “a little bitch.” De Leon also took a swipe at both neighboring Orange County (SET ITAL) and (END ITAL) the Los Angeles Times. He said Latinos need not fear “those crazies in Orange County who are pro-Trump. It’s the white liberals. It’s the L.A. Times.”

Another white man, the Los Angeles City Controller, came under attack, as did the white colleagues on the council. Martinez said, “You need to go talk to that white guy (the city controller). It’s not us. It’s the white members on this council that will motherf--- you in a heartbeat.”

Martinez also attacked the Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascon, but not for his soft-on-crime policies that many point to as a major cause of the rise in violent crime. About Gascon, Martinez said, “F--- that guy ... He’s with the blacks.” Apparently to Martinez, Gascon’s policies, which allow bad guys to remain on the streets where they disproportionately shoot and kill blacks, is being “with the blacks.”

In a discussion about whether immigrants from Oaxaca, Mexico, are part of Los Angeles’ Koreatown, Martinez said: “I see a lot of little short dark people. ... I was like, I don’t know where these people are from, I don’t know what village they came (from), how they got here. They’re ugly.”

As for the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor’s President Ron Herrera, he publicly supports black candidates for council, but on the tape says, “My goal in life is to get the three of you elected. We’re like the little Latino caucus of our own.” If this means diminishing black political power to do so, well, so be it.

In the hourlong meeting, the four uttered not one word about the city’s record-setting crime and homelessness. They said nothing about the poor urban K-12 government schools or about the city’s declining population, caused in part by the lack of housing affordability for the working and middle classes. As for these liberals’ quest to increase “Latino power,” this raises a few questions. What is the left-wing Latino position on homelessness that differs from the position of the left-wing non-Latinos on City Council? What is the left-wing Latino position on reversing the population loss? What is the Latino position on crime, something that 77% of city residents say they are concerned about? What is the Latino position, compared to their non-Latino liberal colleagues, on how and why test scores of government schools in California are near the bottom when compared to other states, with the scores of Angelenos lower than the California state average?

Martinez and Herrera have resigned, while the two other council members, Gil Cedillo and de Leon, have been stripped of their committee assignments but have resisted calls for their resignation. Cedillo, however, lost his reelection bid, and his term ends in December. Tough to pin this on “white supremacy.” Was this the LA City Council or a KKK meeting?. �

Larry Elder is a best-selling author and nationally syndicated radio talk-show host. To find out more about Larry Elder, or become an “Elderado,” visit www.LarryElder.com. Follow Larry on Twitter @ larryelder. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2022 LAURENCE A. ELDER DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

Raging

EXCLUSIVE: Joe Biden May Be Senile, However This All A Part Of A Bigger Plan; “Intentional In Aiding…”

BY NICOLE JOHNSON

Stop saying that this administration is inept and idiotic. This administration is not inept. It is quite the opposite.

It’s intentional and calculated. They are intentional in aiding in the destruction of our country.

From the border crisis to inflation, to dropping rates in education, to funding Ukraine, to neglecting our troops, and insane gas prices, it’s all extremely intentional. Don’t let this administration fool you.

The “Great Reset”, the “Liberal World Order”, the Green New Deal, the “New World Order”, or Build Back Better…they are all sides of the same coin and are what this administration aims for.

This administration intentionally chooses “America Last” and does not put “America First.”

Look, I believe in helping others and being kind, but what is more unkind and unhelpful than letting your own countrymen suffer as you dole out billions and billions. As you send aid and formula to other nations, though we need it just as much?

Let’s dig in.

On President Biden’s first day in office, he shut down the Keystone XL pipeline. He killed the 1,700-mile pipeline that would have employed more than 11,000 Americans. It would have transported nearly 830,000 barrels of oil per day, from Alberta to the Gulf Coast of Texas.

And recently, the Biden administration sold up one million barrels of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to a Chinese state-controlled oil/gas company. The Biden administration said that the sale

to Sinopec would “address the pain Americans are feeling at the pump” and “help lower energy costs.” And speaking of energy costs, according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics the percent change in electricity costs from January 2019 to February 2022 is +12%.

They keep blaming the war in Ukraine for increases in prices and oil/gas, but prices for almost everything have been rising steadily since Biden came into office. The rate of inflation is at a 40-year high and reached 9.1% in June.

If you look at the chart, consumer prices were rising way before Russia invaded Ukraine, in February of 2022.

And let’s talk about Ukraine. This administration has sent 11 aid packages to Ukraine. The latest emergency funding package coming in around $40 BILLION. Yes, BILLION.

And what did Americans get with soaring gas prices, formula crisis, food shortages, and increases in the cost of just about everything?

Raging

Oh, nothing.

And let’s not forget the insanity that is our Southern border.

Fox News recently reported:

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection released its June 2022 Monthly Operational Report showing record levels of border crossings are continuing, including a record-setting number of terrorist sightings and an increased number of unaccompanied children and illegal drugs found at the U.S.-Mexico border.

In the report, the CBP said there were more than 207,416 encounters at the U.S.-Mexico border for the month of June. While the overall number of border interactions is down from May’s all-time high of 239,000, it is the fourth month in a row of more than 200,000 encounters.

Of those total encounters, 26% were seeking to enter the U.S. after having “at least one prior encounter in the previous 12 months,” the CBP said. Also, 68% were single adults, without children or accompanied family members.

The flooding of migrants through our porous border is extremely intentional. The administration always says it is welcoming people escaping their countries, but we know the truth.

They want votes.

Allowing what is happening at our border is not a humanitarian effort. It is a human-trafficking crisis and allows for drugs, especially fentanyl to come into our country.

All this “incompetence” is truly a front for ushering in their new global government. It’s all about more

The

Raging Patriot

government control and fewer freedoms. It’s about the Great Reset.

Zero Hedge said it best: Simply put, the Great Reset agenda is a high-tech, communist, global panopticon.

In short, they want total control over you in all domains—a new feudalism.

They’re emotionally manipulating people with fear and false narratives into accepting things they ordinarily wouldn’t—like their enslavement.

That’s what their Great Reset agenda is all about. It’s self-evidently anathema to personal freedom, human dignity, and self-determination.

It’s out in the open, too. Here we have Biden advisor Brian Deese saying the quiet part out loud.

“Well, what you heard from the president today was a clear articulation of the stakes,” Deese said. “ This is about the future of the liberal world order and we have to stand firm.”

Newsweek shared:

According to World101, an online course from the Council on Foreign Relations think tank, the “liberal world order” refers to a “series of international organizations and agreements to promote global cooperation on issues including security, trade, health, and monetary policy.” It was created by world leaders in the wake of World War II to prevent the world from devolving into such violence again, and the U.S. has “championed” the system since, according to the explainer.

But we all know what those words mean, namely,

“global cooperation”, and they always use the term “for the greater good.” It’s all about fear and pressure to control.

Zero Hedge shared: Some propagandists in the media claim that the inflationary crisis is an opportunity, while others try to claim that climate change is the direct cause of inflation, and if we don’t accept carbon taxation then we will continue to suffer under an inflationary collapse. But we all know what the game is here: To

use public fears of financial disaster to lure people into accepting authoritarian environmentalism because “Prices are already high anyway, so why not?”

So please, let’s stop saying this administration is incompetent. Yes, Joe Biden’s mental health is in question, but they are just using him to distract from their intent.

All the chaos, the confusion, the suffering, the gaslighting, and the insanity; it’s all for a purpose and it’s not in your best interest.

Joost Meerloo, a Dutch/American doctor and psycho-anaylst said it best: “There is another important weapon the totalitarians use in their campaign to frighten the world into submission. This is the weapon of psychological shock. Hitler kept his enemies in a state of constant confusion and diplomatic upheaval. They never knew what this unpredictable madman was going to do next. Hitler was never logical, because he knew that that was what he was expected to be. Logic can be met with logic, while illogic cannot— it confuses those who think straight. The Big Lie and monotonously repeated nonsense have more emotional appeal in a cold wasr than logic and reason. While the enemy is still searching for a reasonable counter-argument to the first lie, the totalitarians can assault him with another.”

I am hopeful that the American spirit will push against this administration and the global effort of suppression and bring back ‘America First” in 2024.

I have hope, and so should you. But, we must be aware that we aren’t led by inept leaders, we are led by very intentional ones. �

The

Raging

“I am hopeful that the American spirit will push against this administration and the global effort of suppression and bring back ‘America First” in 2024.”

EXCLUSIVE: The Real Patriarchy and Dystopian Nightmare The Left Can’t See

BY NICOLE JOHNSON

On June 24th, 2022, an event occurred that I never thought I’d see in my lifetime. Roe v. Wade was overturned.

While many people are extremely elated and so grateful for this decision—the decision to save innocent lives—many others are not.

One of the most disturbing reactions I’ve seen to Roe v. Wade being overturned is of companies virtue-signaling that they will be paying for women to get abortions, whether that be paying for transportation to the abortion or the actual procedure.

What is more dystopian and oppressive to women than offering to kill their baby so they can keep working for you? To kill a child so a woman can continue to be another low-wage cog in the soulless machine that is the company. Maybe, just maybe, it’s because they don’t care about women and their “rights” at all. Perhaps their motive is simply to avoid paying for extended time off work, to line their pockets, and to keep women slaving away in the dull grind of day-

to-day work. It’s much easier to kill off a baby than to pay for her maternity leave. It’s easier to continue to keep the company’s best interest in mind and not the woman’s or the child’s.

Activists cry out against systemic oppression against women; well, this seems pretty oppressive to me. And not merely oppressive, but actually dystopian, yet many are applauding these companies.

Truly, what an upside-down world we live in.

This is another way to act like you are empowering women while erasing what makes women unique. To sell them the lie that they are only empowered when working for someone. To sell them the lie that a child will set you back. To sell them the lie that they are only valuable and seen as useful when it’s with a company or outside the home. To sell the lie that you can’t be both a mom and work.

After Roe v. Wade was overturned, many states immediately announced that they would make abortion illegal. Some of these states include Texas,

Kentucky, Louisiana, Tennessee, and South Dakota.

The companies, with a presence in those states, also quickly announced that if you lived in a state where you could not easily kill your baby, they would help you to travel out of the state and pay for you to do so. Here is a list of most of the companies that have said they will pay for the expenses necessary for a woman to obtain an abortion out-of-state:

Amazon, Bank of America, Bumble, BuzzFeed, Cigna, Citigroup, CNN, Comcast, Condé Nast, CVS Health, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Estee Lauder, Goldman Sachs Group, Hewlett-Packard, IKEA US, JPMorgan Chase, Kroger, New York Times, Lyft, Match Group, MasterCard, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Paramount, Patagonia, PayPal, Procter & Gamble, Salesforce, Starbucks, Target, Tesla, Uber, Vox Media, Walk Disney, Yelp, Yahoo, Zendesk, and Zillow.

Raging

Activist covered in fake blood at a rally against Trump. Her shirt says “Abortion on demand and without apology”.

| NurPhoto/SIPA USA/PA Images 2018. All rights reserved.

These companies are adding what they call “critical healthcare” packages to their employees’ benefits.

The Hill shared what some companies will be offering their employees:

• Dick’s Sporting Goods is reimbursing employees $4,000 in travel expenses.

• Amazon will also provide $4,000 for travel expenses outside of 100 miles of an employee’s home.

• Starbucks will reimburse all abortion travel expenses not available within 100 miles

• Yelp will pay for travel costs

• Microsoft will reimburse employees for travel expenses related to an abortion

• Apple will cover all travel expenses

• Netflix will pay up to $10,000 for travel reimbursement for abortions

• Tesla pays for travel and lodging for employees who get an abortion outside their home state.

There is, however, a company in Texas, Buffer Insurance, is supporting women and families. The Texas-based company vowed to offer maternity and paternity leave to employees who have children, as well as cover the costs of their female employees giving birth. The company also promised to help out employees seeking to adopt children.

“Secular companies are paying the travel costs for employees to abort babies out-of state,” Buffer wrote in a Facebook post. “Today we are announcing that Buffer will pay the costs for our employees who birth babies.”

The

Raging Patriot

“Employers: If you’d like to learn how you can provide these benefits to your employees, let us know. We have ready-to-use policies you can add to your employee handbooks,” the company continued.

To me, the real dystopian nightmare is not one where women have children and step into how God has created them to be. No, the real dystopian and patriarchal nightmare is one where companies and men force you to believe a lie and murder your child for them. The real nightmare is not seeing that an unborn child is a living, breathing human being.

This is a picture of a baby at 12-weeks in its mother’s womb. At this stage it can open and close its fingers, it is approximately 2 inches long, it will react if you press against it, and all its important systems and parts are basically done developing.

I read a very well-written article by Caitlin Flanagan of the Atlantic, and this quote struck me: “The argument for abortion requires many words. The argument against doesn’t even take a single word.”

Pro-abortion advocates will talk of the injustice to women, and how it is “their body, their choice”. I do not turn away from the injustices to women, I see them very clearly. Yet, I can’t seem to think of how an injustice done to one being begets another injustice, namely, to kill a being that has no voice.

The real nightmare is thinking your worth is in what you do, and not in who God has uniquely made you to be. The real nightmare is screeching on government building steps because you can’t sacrifice your baby to Moloch anymore.

Oh, and let’s not even get started on what a woman is because apparently, they know what that is now after Roe was overturned.

Pray for this country. Pray for women to be valued as God intended. Pray for men to step up. Pray for The Lord to protect innocent lives. Pray for The Lord to forgive our nation, for killing his precious creations. Be compassionate to those who disagree with you. But never stop sharing the truth of LIFE.

As Dr. Seuss would say, “A person’s a person no matter how small.”.�

EXCLUSIVE: “I’m going to murder Trump!” –Florida Gun Shop Owner Foils Plot To Assassinate President Trump

BY JESUS ARIAS February 28, 2022

OA Raging Patriot Insider brings you the first-ever Raging Patriot Exclusive. Our first exclusive came when our Insider was able to interview James, owner of ‘Baddog Guns Gold and Pawn’ in Florida, about how he was able to disrupt a plan to assassinate the president. This narrative takes us to Florida and to the end of last week.

SUBSCRIBER CONTENT

Last week, a weird man strolled into a gun store in Orange City, Florida, seeking to swap a jeep for a bunch of weapons as part of his terribly insane conspiracy to murder former President Donald J. Trump.

While appearing normal and going about his typical day, he stumbled into the gun store, where he confidently walks inside the gun store to exchange his vehicle for a load of firearm weapons, all the while babbling about his intention to assassinate President Donald Trump, continually repeating that he would blow the president’s head off.

The gun store owner, simply identified as “James,” was astonished by how insane this unusual individual appeared to be and how sloppy he was being with his goals by blurting and mumbling about this deluded scheme.

James told us everything he knew about the incredible incident. According to him, the individual entered the shop and appeared to be a typical person trying to buy a gun for defense or protection. While they were talking, and this character was buying his second weapon, and then picking out a third one, he adds that this man began to murmur. According to James, this man was muttering, and he kept hearing phrases similar to “murder him.” He eventually persuaded him to spill the soup, and what was going on?

The individual said, “Trump, I’m going to murder Trump!” according to reports. And the man goes mad inside the shop, telling everyone that he’s going to blow Trump’s head off and that he wants

Source: REUTERS/AARON P. BERNSTEIN

to be on TV. James claims he fooled him into turning up his identity and personal information while checking boxes as if he had ever been in a mental institution, despite the fact that the subject proudly declared that he had.

After the gun store owner allegedly obtained the individual’s identification, he promptly reported the event to local police authorities.

Within a few days, the secret service allegedly entered the property, determined what was going on, and concluded that this man represented a threat and that they were looking after him.

So, this dude was completely insane and intended to murder President Trump. He mentioned looking

for him and asking others if they knew where he was. They allegedly told James that if he saw the man, he should call 911 immediately and they would come and take him away.

The individual allegedly indicated that he intended to assassinate Trump, blow his head off, and appear on television. He indicated that he was going to get everyone in his way, and that one of the weaponry he was going to purchase was an AR-15, and that with it, he could do enough harm without having to be near.�

Article written by Jesus Arias. Jesus Arias is a journalist, analyst, and patriot. Throughout his career, he has written a variety of articles and has always sought to deliver the truth to the American people.

Raging

Photo

TRUMP ENTERS KOREA

Seoul CNN —

By Kevin Liptak, CNN Sun June 30, 2019

President Donald Trump shook hands with Kim Jong Un on Sunday and took 20 steps into North Korea, making history as the first sitting US leader to set foot in the hermit kingdom.

Trump crossed the low stone curb separating the North and South at 3:45 p.m. local time, making his way alongside a grinning Kim into a country that’s long been a global pariah for its nuclear ambitions and dismal record on human rights.

The event, seemingly spontaneous and broadcast live, took to a new level Trump’s showman instincts and view of diplomacy as a test of interpersonal skills. Afterward, Trump said he agreed with Kim to revive staff-level talks that had collapsed after their last summit in February.

The encounter at the heavily fortified Korean Demilitarized Zone – their third in person – came a day after Trump raised the prospect of a border handshake in a tweet and declared he’d have “no problem” stepping into North Korea.

“I never expected to meet you at this place,” Kim, who appeared overjoyed in the moment, told Trump through an interpreter.

Later, Trump said he was “proud to step over the line” and thanked Kim for the meeting. He invited him to the White House, though later acknowledged such a visit would likely not come soon.

THE DAY PRESIDENT TRUMP ANNOUNCED THE US EMBASSY MOVE TO JERUSALEM

It was a critical milestone in US foreign policy, it took courage and it improved the prospects for peace

On December 6, 2017, President Donald Trump announced what no previous president had officially declared while in office: Jerusalem is the capital of Israel.

Neil Gorsuch’s Confirmation to the Supreme Court

It was a critical milestone in US foreign policy, it took courage and it improved the prospects for peace

Trump’s biggest early victory came when the Senate, in April, confirmed Neil Gorsuch to succeed the late Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court.

Gorsuch’s appointment marked the end of a bitter struggle between Democrats and Republicans over the vacant seat. It was also a victory for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who for nearly a year blocked former President Obama’s pick to replace Scalia from getting even a hearing to sit on the court.

Raging

January 23, 2017

TPP Withdrawal

Trump directs the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative to withdraw the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a twelve-country, Asia-focused trade agreement the United States had championed under the Barack Obama administration.

Raging

April 7, 2017

Striking Syria

In retaliation for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s use of the chemical weapon sarin in an attack against civilians, Trump authorizes a limited cruise missile strike on the regime-controlled Shayrat Air Base. U.S.-sponsored measures against the regime at the UN Security Council are blocked by Russia, part of a long-running trend.

March 1, 2018 –April 3, 2018

Announcing Tariffs

Citing national security concerns, the president announces on March 1 that the United States will impose tariffs on foreign-made steel and aluminum. The administration imposes the restrictions on China but exempts Canada and other U.S.-aligned states, as well as the European Union, as trade negotiations continue.

The

Mission Statement:

The Raging Patriot is a conservative news outlet that aims for truthful news to inform the general public of the United States of America.

Real News Real Patriots by