MONDAY, JANUARY 9, 2012
4 - THE INDEPENDENT, BIGGAR, SK
Opinions The Weather This year the only topic on the tongues of Biggarites is the weather. No one can believe the warm temps we are experiencing especially because it is the first month of the year. January is traditionally considered the coldest month of the year. While I was doing some research I came across some New Year’s superstitions and this one about the weather was quite interesting. Examine the weather in the early hours of New Year’s Day. If the wind blows from the south, there will be fine weather and prosperous times in the year ahead. If it comes from the north, it will be a year of bad weather. The wind blowing from the east brings famine and calamities. Strangest of all, if the wind blows from the west, the year will witness plentiful supplies of milk and fish but will also see the death of a very important person. If there’s no wind at all, a joyful and prosperous year may be expected by all. Whether you believe in superstitions or not it does give some food for thought. We have had many customers who came in this last week to renew their subscription before taking off on a winter holiday. Some remarked that they look forward to a reprieve from cold temps and try to get away in January for a bit of a break but that just isn’t the case this year. Still a holiday is a welcome break. However, there is a flip side to the coin. Those who like to indulge in winter sports such as skiing and snowmobiling aren’t as happy with the weatherman. For these people snow is a must. It is hard to please everyone, especially if you are in charge of predicting weather but then the only one in control here is Mother Nature. Enjoy the season.
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR are welcome. They MUST be signed, approximately 300 words in length and are subject to editing.
P.H.
Is Canada a big polluter? It’s all a matter of perspective by Benjamin Gillies, Columnist Distributed by Troy Media, www.troymedia.com. Well, it's official: Canada is out of Kyoto. While critics were quick to chastise our government for its decision to withdraw from the international accord, supporters have passionately jumped to Ottawa’s defense, arguing it really makes no difference whether we are involved in the agreement. After all, they say, our country is responsible for only about 1.85 per cent of global emissions, which makes Canada an insignificant source of carbon pollution. As is often the case with statistics, however, whether our country is a big CO2 emitter is a matter of perspective because our seemingly paltry less than two per cent of global emissions
are enough to make Canada the eighth-largest overall greenhouse gas-producing nation in the world. Canada one of the bad guys To put that another way, if the 184 lowest-emitting countries banded together against just the top 10 worst polluters on the planet, Canada would be one of the bad guys. So while our 1.85 per cent does not look troublesome in isolation, it does make the great white north a larger contributor to the problem than almost all other countries on earth. Currently, China is the world’s largest national polluter, pouring a whopping 23 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere. The Asian giant is followed by the United States at about 20 per cent, India at 5.7
per cent and Russia at approximately 5.6 per cent. Undoubtedly, there will never be a meaningful reduction in total CO2 output without action on the part of these nations. Still, though per capita American emissions are higher than those north of the border, in Russia they are only about half the Canadian total, while Chinese and Indian carbon output per person is just one third and one-tenth the Canadian figure, respectively. With only 0.49 per cent of the world’s population, our 1.85 per cent of global emissions is about 3.7 times more than what could be considered our fair share. As such, it is rather hypocritical of us to tell the Chinese (or Russians or Indians) that they should significantly reduce their emissions without working to bring down our own
per capita pollution. Citizens of those countries are likely to question why they should undertake the effort and expense of reducing their emissions, while we can burn carbon in excess. How is it just, they may ask, that a typical Canadian is allowed to pollute far more than the average Chinese citizen, simply by virtue of the fact they were born in a country with a much smaller population? When our contribution to the problem is greater relative to our size, expecting changes from others while staying our own carbon-intensive course can only be perceived as unfair, and our demands will likely be ignored. Of course, some defenders of the status quo suggest the reason we emit so much is because Canada produces the energy supplies other countries
INDEPENDENT
the
Phone: 306-948-3344
Fax: 306-948-2133
Publications Mail Registrations No. 0008535 Published by THE INDEPENDENT PRINTERS LTD. and issued every Monday at the office of publication, 102 - 3rd Ave. West, Biggar, Saskatchewan, S0K 0M0 Publishers - Margaret and Daryl Hasein Editor - Kevin Brautigam Advertising Consultant - Urla Tyler Composition - Delta Fay Cruickshank
crave - and certainly, this does play a role in our pollution rate. Yet, Saudi Arabia, responsible for over 11 per cent of global oil production versus Canada’s 4.3 per cent, generates only 1.45 per cent of all CO2 emissions. Similarly, Norway produces about four times the amount of oil per citizen as we do, but is responsible for just 0.17 per cent of world greenhouse gases and has per capita emissions half those of Canada. Whether the Kyoto Accord is the best vehicle for reducing the global carbon footprint is in doubt, with good reason. Nevertheless, while no longer part of the treaty, Canadians should not become complacent about our impact on pollution simply because it is ‘only’ two per cent of the world total. Canadians must become part of the solution
We are not the very worst offenders, but we still emit 370 per cent more CO2 than is our fair share. Perhaps this is because our lifestyle is overly pollutant, compared to those of our global counterparts, or because our energy sector is considerably dirtier than those of other nations - as environmentalists have been arguing all along. Either way, if Canadians believe reducing greenhouse gas emissions is a valid environmental challenge, then there is ample reason for us to make a concerted effort to be part of the solution. Benjamin Gillies is a political economy graduate from the University of Manitoba, where he focused on urban development and energy policy. He works as a consultant in Winnipeg.
www.biggarindependent.ca
E-mail: tip@sasktel.net
P. O. Box 40 Biggar, SK S0K 0M0
COPYRIGHT The contents of The Independent are protected by copyright. Reproduction of any material herein may be made only with the written permission of the publisher. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR The Biggar Independent invites the public to participate in its letters to the Editor section. All letters must be signed. We acknowledge the financial support of the Government of Canada, through the Canada Periodical Fund (CPF) for our publishing activities.