Skip to main content

Indigent Defense

Page 54

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Use of Mitigation Evidence Chapter 9

NO.****

§ § § § §

STATE OF TEXAS vs. JOHN DOE

IN THE DISTRICT COURT ***nd JUDICIAL DISTRICT

********* COUNTY, TEXAS

MOTION FOR VOIR DIRE OF EXPERT WITNESS TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Now comes John Doe, Defendant in the above styled and numbered cause, and moves this Court to conduct a hearing prior to trial and outside the presence of the jury to determine the preliminary question of the qualification of all expert witnesses upon which the state intends to rely at trial , and to determine the underlying facts and data upon which their opinions are based, and for good cause shows the following:

l.

John Doe expects the state to rely upon specific expert witnesses to testify as to certain facts at trial , which may prove necessary in proving its case.

2.

These specific expert witnesses are listed as follows:

a. 3.

**

The burden of establishing the admissibility of an expert's opinion rests on the party offering the evidence.

4.

Whether the proffered witness possesses the requisite qualifications is a preliminary matter for the trial court to decide and not a matter of weight only to be determined by the jury.

5.

The party offering such evidence also bears the burden of establishing the relevance of the proffered and/or proposed evidence and testimony to be offered

46


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Indigent Defense by TCDLA - Issuu