he time she was in secondhe top speaker in the B diviof time you have to mold a makes a lot of difference so chools that was something t the tertiary level, it really e school. In National Junior any debaters were actually first place, around half of not have much debating it was challenging to preot only a higher level of dethat I would be teaching atch. I would definitely say y level is much more chalbe frightening for some who hed at the secondary level tertiary level but to be very ize that the skills set in defor both levels.
nk that one’s age is the actor in a quality deyou think that experiot dependent on age?
t age is such a determining ty debate. Especially for the e past, debate was somedone seasonally -- by the onths, there was not many o go for after that. It demuch training you’ve had in e isn’t really determining not. You would see certain the students are well haps, are exposed to mock go against other schools, ebates and invitational all time they are at secondary youth 14, some debaters ght actually be better than at the tertiary level. Though would be a tertiary level stut have much training at all.
because debate is someuseful -- it trains you to imnd and this applies even ally young.