HO W DO E S S Y R A C U S E MANAG E ME NT CO MPARE TO O TH ER C ITIES? It is often valuable to compare Syracuse’s urban forest management practices and performance with those of peer groups and national averages. This information is provided to give some perspective on Syracuse operations for use in broad discussions with citizens, elected officials, and other city staff. Table 9 provides data comparing some of Syracuse’s primary urban forest and urban forest management program metrics with national and regional averages in the categories of urban forest quantity, funding, program management, maintenance and planting, and tree benefit values. The national and regional benchmark data provided here should not necessarily be interpreted as a goal or best management practice (BMP) for Syracuse; the data is presented for comparison purposes only and does not imply that peer groups are following industry standards or other BMPs.
A Positive ROI For every $1 of public funds spent on tree care, the city and citizens receive over $2 of annual benefits.
The benchmark information in Table 9 reveals both areas of strength and opportunities for improvement for Syracuse’s urban forest and management program. Indicators of positive trends from the benchmarking are that: ● Syracuse’s urban tree canopy cover is on par with the national average and its peer group. ● The city enjoys a positive return on investment. ● However, the benchmark information reveals that Syracuse could improve its management approach… ● …by increasing its commitment to fund a progressive urban forest management program. In relation to the annual municipal budget, the amount dedicated to tree management is the lowest of all national and regional averages. ● …by increasing maintenance and using a proactive approach. Syracuse’s the annual maintenance production rates are among the lowest.
D AV E Y R E S O U R C E G R O U P | E N V I R O N M E N TA L C O N S U LT I N G
61