Items Vol. 35 No. 3 (1981)

Page 1

SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH COUNCIL

VOLUME 35 • NUMBER 3 • SEPTEMBER 1981 605 THIRD AVENUE. NEW YORK, N.Y. 10158

Federal Funding for the Social Sciences: Threats and Responses by Kenneth Prewitt and David L. Sills*

THE PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT on February 18, 1981 that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) was proposing drastic cuts in the NSF budgets for social science research sent shock waves through the social science community. Although basic research budgets for the National Science Foundation were still scheduled for funding increases in FY 82, according to the OMB's so-called "black book," social, behavioral, and economic research in NSF's Directorate for Biological, Behavioral, and Social Sciences (BBS) was slated for massive budget cuts in both FY 81 and FY 82 (see table on page 35). For FY 82, OMB requested a 75 per cent reduction in the budget for NSF's Social and Economic Science Division, and within the Behavioral and Neural Sciences Division, a 66 per cent reduction in the anthropology program and a 60 per cent reduction in the cognitive and behavioral science research program. The rationale provided by OMB for these proposed reductions in funding was simply that "the support of these sciences is considered of relatively lesser importance to the economy than the support of the natural sciences" (Additional Details on Budget Savings, Executive Office of the President, OMB, April 1981). Regardless of how these proposed cuts in the NSF (and other federal social science research) budgets were interpreted, they set in motion a train of events that is perhaps unprecedented in the history of the social sciences. Because many Council committee and

* Mr. Prewitt, a political scientist, has been president of the Council since 1979. Mr. Sills, a sociologist, has been an executive associate at the Council since 1973.

board members, past and present, were active in these events, and because the issues underlying the ensuing dispute-such as the "usefulness" of basic researchare central to all the social sciences, a substantial portion of this issue of Items is devoted to publishing excerpts from letters, testimony, and resolutions, as well as sufficient commentary to guide the reader through the excerpts. Hundreds of thousands of words were written or published in the period of six months or so encompassed by this review, and we are able to publish only a small sample of them.

Ashbrook amendment recalled Federal funding for social science research declined in real dollars during the 1970s, but certain

CONTENTS OF THIS ISSUE 33 48

51 52 55 56

Federal Funding for the Social Sciences: Threats and Responses-Kennelh Prewitt and David L. Sills Current Activities at the Council -The transition from slavery to free labor in the Caribbean (p. 48) -Bureaucracy and Chinese rural development (p. 49) -Lu Xun and his legacy (p. 49) -Contemporary Cambodia (p. 50) Two African Studies Conferences Newly-issued Council Publications Other Recent Publications: A Selection Personnel -New directors and officers -Staff appointment

33


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.