SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH COUNCIL
VOLUME 23 . NUMBER 3 . SEPTEMBER 1969 230 PARK AVENUE· NEW YORK, N.Y. 10017
BIOLOGY AND THE SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES by Gerald E. McClearn·
IT IS becoming increasingly apparent that many problems in social and behavioral science research may be illuminated in important ways by application of perspectives developed in biological sciences. There are numerous examples of social and behavioral scientists finding that the theoretical treatment of their particular areas of specialization can be expanded and strengthened by invoking explanatory principles from one or another biological discipline. Furthermore, some urgent social problems such as those arising from population pressures and environmental pollution would seem to require the integrated application of concepts from the social, behavioral, and biological sciences if solutions are to be found at all. In response to numerous indications of interdisciplinary stirrings, the Social Science Research Council in 1966 broadened the purview of its Committee on Genetics and Behavior and renamed it the Committee on Biological Bases of Social Behavior. In general terms, the committee then undertook to explore the developing areas between the social and biological sciences, to determine the dimension of need for explicit interdisciplinary training efforts, to evaluate the effectiveness of the methods by which social scientists currently utilizing biological perspectives acquired their biological knowl• The author is Professor of Psychology and Director, Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado. He was a member of the Council's former Committee on Genetics and Behavior, 1961-{l6, and has served as chairman of the Committee on Biological Bases of Social Behavior since 1966. He presented the substance of the present report at the March 1969 meeting of the board of directors of the Council. The other members of the present committee are Theodosius Dobzhansky, Rockefeller University; Daniel X. Freedman, University of Chicago; David C. Glass, Russell Sage Foundation; Gardner Lindzey, University of Texas; Stanley Schachter, Columbia University; staff, Norman W. Storer.
edge, and where appropriate to promote the utilization of biological concepts and theories in social science research and training. CONFERENCE ON BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE TRAINING FOR SOCIAL SCIENTISTS: OPENING STATEMENTS One of the first projects of the committee was the planning of a conference to bring to bear upon these objectives the accumulated experience of social and biological scientists who are engaged in interdisciplinary training and research. The conference was held at Las Croabas, Puerto Rico, February 2-6, 1969, with support granted to the Council by the Russell Sage Foundation and the National Institute of Mental Health. The participants included 27 social and biological scientists in addition to six members of the committee and staff.1 1 In addition to Messrs. Dobzhansky, Freedman, Lindzey, McCleam, Schachter, and Storer, the participants were Kurt W. Back, Duke Uni· versity; Paul T. Baker, Pennsylvania State University; Colin G. Beer, Rutgers University; Floyd E. Bloom, National Institute of Mental Health; Richard A. Chase, Johns Hopkins University; Bertram D. Cohen, Rutgers University; John C. DeFries, University of Colorado; Bruce K. Eckland, University of North Carolina; Fred Elmadjian, National Institute of Mental Health; Irving I. Gottesman, University of Minnesota; Howard F. Hunt, Columbia University; Leo M. Hurvich, University of Pennsylvania; Seymour S. Kety, Harvard Medical School; John I. Lacey, Fels Research Institute; Richard S. Lazarus, University of California, Berkeley; Morris A. Lipton, University of North Carolina Medical School; David T. Lykken, University of Minnesota; William V. Mayer, Biological Sciences Curriculum Study, Boulder; Everett W. Maynert, University of Illinois College of Medicine; David Mechanic, University of Wisconsin; Eugene Roberts, City of Hope National Medical Center; Lloyd J. Roth, University of Chicago School of Medicine; Roger W. Russell, University of California, Irvine; Jerome E. Singer, State University of New York at Stony Brook; Joseph C. Speisman, Boston University; James N. Spuhler, University of New Mexico; and Richard F. Thompson, University of California, Irvine.
33