sjsunews.com/spartan_daily
SPOTLIGHT
TUESDAY, OCT. 16, 2018
B7
Double standards limit women athletes Hugo Vera
STAFF WRITER
BY THE PERMISSION OF DR. HARRY EDWARDS, FROM THE POWER OF PROTEST EXHIBITION, SJSU SPECIAL COLLECTIONS AND ARCHIVES
Sports offers dynamic platform for activism Politics are deeply rooted in our everyday life, so it is unrealistic to think that there are certain professions that are immune to public affairs. Sports, in particular, has always been a hotbed for political speech and action. One of the most visible instances of this was during the 1936 Summer Olympics in Berlin, Germany when Adolf Hitler utilized the games as an opportunity to spread Nazi propaganda. His administration described sports as a way to “weed out the weak, Jewish and other undesirables.” To his dismay, black track star Jesse Owens beat the Germans for the gold in the 100-meter sprint, 200-meter sprint, 4x100-meter relay and the long jump. If the Berlin track field could be used to promote hateful ideology, then former San Jose State University athletes, Tommie Smith and John Carlos were well within their right to use the Mexico City track field at the 1968 Summer Olympics as a platform to raise the issue of social inequality. Sports is a universal language that garners a massive audience. There are few better outlets to get a message across than with one that commands full attention from its viewers. Smith and Carlos weren’t just protesting racism and
Vicente Vera STAFF WRITER
promoting black power. The many purposefully made inconsistencies in their clothing all represented a larger narrative that they felt needed to be addressed. After winning a gold medal for the 200, Smith stepped onto the awards podium with Carlos, who had just won bronze in the same race. Both men then took their shoes off to reveal black socks meant to represent black poverty. Carlos unzipped his jacket to show solidarity to blue-collar workers and wore a strand of beads around his neck that hung all the way down to his waist. According to Carlos, he sported the beads in order to recognize “individuals that were lynched, or killed and that no-one said a prayer for.” Harry Edwards, San Jose State University alumnus, social activist for the Olympic Project for human rights in 1968, played a significant role in the events leading up to the protest. As leader of the OPHR organization on campus, Ed-
wards encouraged black athletes to boycott the Mexico City Olympic Games. He showed the world that not all athletes are mindless brutes who will remain silent on the issue of racism when given the world stage. I’m proud to have attended the same university as those Smith, Carlos and Edwards. Edwards continues to visit the university and deliver speeches to students, faculty and the football team. SJSU long snapper Harrison Hoffman said he has become more open to the idea of athletes voicing their opinions on social issues because of Edwards. “Tommie Smith and John Carlos were continuing a movement that had already started,” Hoffman said. “That picture of them is one of the most iconic of the 20th century, so I definitely think there’s a place for political stances in sports.” For SJSU wide receiver Steven Houston, athletes are relatable and he considers them to be role models. “People look up to ath-
letes, and that gives them a lot of influence,” he said. Houston also spoke on the criticism of former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick and his protests of police brutality during the national anthem that plays before every football game. “When you think about Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X, they got huge amounts of backlash for trying to promote equal rights movements,” Houston said. “There’s always going to be backlash, and for the athletes, the hardest part is having to fight through it,” he continued. Fifty years after the Black Power protests, Smith and Carlos are among the most prestiges alumni at SJSU, honored with their own monument. “Despite all the hate Kaepernick got, he’s still persistent in not being silenced, I think he’s for sure going to see the light at the end of the tunnel,” Houston said. I believe athletes like Kaepernick who protested in similar ways will be viewed in the same light as their predecessors. Hopefully that time will come sooner rather than later. Follow Vicente on Twitter @ VicenteSJSU
On Sept. 8, Naomi Osaka made history as one of the youngest, and the first biracial women to win the U.S. Open. However, that was not the part that got the world’s attention. Throughout the match, a visibly-frustrated Serena Williams approached the umpire’s tower several times. The trips often included Williams shouting obscenities at umpire Carlos Ramos as well as voicing her grievances at Ramos’ rulings. Williams was ultimately fined $17,000 and docked a point her for antics. However, the 23-time Grand Slam Champion brought up a valid point that demands our attention. Williams believed she wouldn’t have been penalized as badly if she was a man. I side with the majority that believes Serena was acting out of line. Partly because I’ve been in her shoes. When an athlete is in a losing position such as the one Williams was in, it’s easy to let blind rage and despair cloud your judgment. A similar situation happened to me when I was a high school wrestler. During a match I was winning, my hubris got the better of me and I heckled the referee to “just call it a pin already” when I had my opponent subdued. The referee stopped the match and disqualified me. He gave the win to my losing opponent and docked me a team point. To this day, the interaction haunts me but I see why the call was made. Whether one is winning or losing, it’s important to remember that your actions objectively decide the outcome. It’s not necessarily calls made by a referee or umpire. Call it what you will, perhaps Williams was a sore loser. Perhaps Ramos was legitimately making the wrong calls. Perhaps both athlete and umpire alike behaved inappropriately on such a global stage. Serena wasn’t right to act the way she did, I’ll admit that. But I’ll argue that his debacle
was needed in the first place to a finally raise awareness to the blatant double standard that comes to how men and women are regulated by sports arbitrators. Take soccer, for example. In the 2018 UEFA Champions League Final, Real Madrid center back Sergio Ramos dislocated Liverpool F.C. forward Mohamed Salah’s shoulder in a rolling tackle move that was most definitely deliberate. Ramos was only given a warning and play resumed. So why did the referees in these particular situations turn a blind eye to an arm dislocation and running the clock with unsportsmanlike flopping? Who could forget the iconic moment in the 1999 FIFA Women’s World Cup when U.S. midfielder Brandi Chastain removed her jersey in celebration of the team’s victory against China and celebrated in her black Nike sports bra? That single image is without question a staple of American folklore and yet Chastain was penalized for the action. Years later, male soccer superstars such as Cristiano Ronaldo and Mario Balotelli partake in shirtless celebration poses and receive no penalty. Going back to tennis, why is it that the women are criticized for “grunting” when serving and yet we never hear complaints about the men? The issue with proving the double standard against women in sports also lies in the lack of women in sports. And the lack is not because of a shortage of willing female athletic talent, but purely because sports continues to be male-centric. Those who hate Serena don’t hate her “sexism” comments because they’re inherently inflammatory. They hate Serena because she’s right.
Follow Hugo on Twitter @ HugoV_II
Professional athletes reserve their rights to protest Winona Rajamohan STAFF WRITER
Fox News host Laura Ingraham responded to a video in February of LeBron James and Kevin Durant sharing their opinions regarding President Donald Trump. SportsCenter anchor Cari Champion asked James and Durant in the YouTube video where their opinions stood regarding the political division in the country and the “climate for an athlete with a platform.” James expressed that he did not believe the president understood or cared about the people and that he wanted fans who watched and listened to him to be aware of the inaccurate or offensive things the president
could be saying. According to the Washington Post, the host fired back at James, asking him to stick to sports and bag the political commentary. “As someone once said, ‘shut up and dribble,’ Ingraham said. The statement was shocking. As I watched the video clip of Ingraham actually saying those words, the frustration that I felt was immediate. It has been argued that many would like to have professional sports be an impartial area of discussion, where political and social divides can’t skew fans from supporting their favorite athletes.
In a tense environment, where everyone and everything is so heavily influenced by the actions of global leaders and their relationships with their communities, it can be nice to have an avenue free of such heated discussions. This is especially true when that avenue is sports – an area where expression during its exciting minutes are focused on the game that takes place in a space, removing any controversies outside of that. However, I believe that we are living in a time where the need to question certain norms, assumptions and systems is strong. The world is moving in a direction where communities are becoming increasingly diverse and embarking on paths bound to cross no matter how hard one may try to run away. Sports has always been an arena strongly influenced by
Sports has always been an arena strongly influenced by myriad races, ethnicities and nationalities rising up to make their people proud. myriad races, ethnicities and nationalities rising up to make their people proud. Through this diversity, sports has been a tool to strengthen identities that have been marginalized or doubted. For this very reason, athletes have such a significant role in addressing the concerns of the communities in which they identify. James and Durant are successful figures and influencers among their countrymen, the people of their state and culture. Thus, their voices are important.
Politicizing sports may risk alienating fans and redirecting off-field matters onto the field, but athletes carry just as much weight in the public eye as any other celebrity or social figure. Don’t pro-athletes also have a platform that allows them to reach to educate when they are informed? “I will not shut up and dribble . . . I mean too much to society, too much to the youth, too much to so many kids who feel they don’t have a way out,” James said following the February 2017 NBA All-Star game. James took the opportunity to leverage the increased
attention that Ingraham’s comments had garnered. He is one of the executive producers of a three partseries on Showtime titled “Shut Up and Dribble” which will premiere on Nov. 3. Fortune Magazine reports that the documentary series will be politically charged and will analyze the roles of athletes in the current political and social landscape. I’m sorry, Laura Ingraham, but they have just as much right as you do to address the issues that they deem important. Being an athlete should fuel productive conversation, and not act as reason to turn a blind eye for the sake of keeping viewers comfortable, ignorant and in the dark.
Follow Winona on Twitter @ winonaarjmh