What responses has the alternative proposal received ?

1. “The change of course for the tramline into the development and then turning further to the peninsula is truely a great idea.”

2. “Overall, so well spaced and very high density. Maybe they should look at a metro connection to Highpoint and this development too. Exactly what that area needs to handle this growth.”

3. “The only real concern is the junction near Rosamond road, military road and Maribyrnong Rds, including the new extention of the latter. That will be avery very busy traffic location.”

4. “I’m not asking for more sprawl and cul-de sacs, but please, the street layout needs more imagination”

5. “23 dwellings per hectare isn’t good enough”

6. “If we aren’t prepared to do this super high density on a 123 hectare site which can provide some decent buffering to existing suburbs (and to the maribyrnong) where the hell would we?

2 trams there already to serve the first stages of the development. and enough time in staging of hte development to build that train line someone had shown above.”

7. “take advantage of the constrained entries and exits for private vehicle traffic to ‘encourage’ a greater use of PT.”

8. “developer should put their neck on the line and make a statement. “

9. Community members are worried about traffic flows without even looking at this proposal.

10. Community members are warming towards parkland and living facade buildings.

bunker dams come in different styles this is Kim Wilke’s work altered for Melbourne!