SLOANE LOVE BROWN
sloaneBROWN
N
N
ALBANY 1934-1935
ALBANY 2010
Sloane Love Brown www.sloanelovebrown.com sloanebrown09@gmail.com N
COUNTRYSIDE LIVING
INTRODUCTION OF THE AUTOMOBILE
N
N
N
PARKING LOTS & WATER
INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL/CAMPUS CORRIDOR
NANO NETWORKS
Nano Networks re-imagines an isolated, 1950s state office campus in Albany, New York as a landscape of natural, built, and social systems intertwining a nanotechnology research park with the city and its residents. This entails a breakdown of boundaries between and within these systems on multiple scales, from underutilized greenways and massive infrastructures threading through the campus to lab and collaborative spaces clustered within the research facilities. In the same way that the enhanced excitability of a single neuron at the nano scale has the capacity to improve the health of an entire neural network, the heightened interconnectivity of systems and spaces in this project creates an energetic network in the city.
a landscape of natural, built, and social systems
ITERATIONS
EXISTING
CLOSED SYSTEM
PROPOSED
FUT UR EP AT ROO GREENWAY N
5
RA NT CE
TE 8 ROU
OFFICE PARK
VE LA
W AS HI N
GT ON
WE STE
RN
AVE
AV E
NETWORK
EXISTING STATE OFFICE CAMPUS
EMPIRE STATE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
NEW PROPOSAL
3 LAB MODULES
ANALYTICAL A CHEMISTRY H
SURFACE A ANALYSIS
NANOSTRUCTURES S I
SECTION A
7 LAB MODULES
2 LAB MODULES
MOLECULAR ELECTRON E CHARAC CHARAC..
E ELECTRICAL TIO CHARACTERIZATION C R
MEMS S CHARACTER C HARA A IZAT Z ION
IN NSTRUCTIONAL T LAB B
INSTRUCTI TIIO O A ONA AL LAB B
AXITRON + EPIGRESS
OPTICAL CHARACTERIZATION
E ELECTRON OSC S MICROSCOPY/ TEM E EM
SCANNING N T ELECTRON MICROSCOPY/ O OPY M SEM
NANOSTRUCTURES S I
NANOSTRUCTURES T II
A NANOSTRUCTURES III
NANOSTRUCTURES A II
B
GROUND LEVEL
A
LEVEL 0
coLAB INTERFACE The organization of lab modules is used to inform the placement of collaborative clusters outside of the labs. Stairs provide a vertical connection between lab floors and passages on the facade allow for quick access to other areas in the building.
PLAN DETAIL QUICK PASSAGE VERTICAL CONNECTION
Surface Analysis Experiment Results Meeting tomorrow! Room 322
SECTION B
204803030 3-039338399993 30r59000000
coLAB INTERFACE
e-FILTER e-waste recycling infrastructure
e-Waste is one of the biggest challenges we face today. Every year, 30-50 million tons of electronic waste (old computers, TVs, cell phones, etc.) is produced around the world and much of it ends up in developing countries, posing extreme health risks and consuming space in increasingly cramped cities. Situated in Apapa Port, the e-Filter project is a 6.5 acre facility that sorts, recycles, and responsibly distributes e-waste once it enters the city in large container ships. Simultaneously, the facility serves as a vocational school, where students learn how to recycle waste by assisting and observing workers in the facility and testing methods in classrooms suspended above facility operations.In order to function most efficiently within Apapa Port, the facility is designed to fit within existing warehouse typologies and organization of the surrounding site.
SITE
Ikeja
Oshodi
Lawanson Jankara Alaba Port of Apapa N
MASTER PLAN
e-Wasteis isa problem a problem can’t ignore... e-Waste wewe can’t ignore...
major e-markets Major e-Markets
Major Landfills
major landfills
LAGOS
10,000 tons
10,000 10,000tons tonsof ofe-waste e-wastearrive arriveininLagos lagoseach eachmonth month
imagine the equivalent of 400,000 computer moniters
Imagine the equivalent of 400,000 computer monitors
spread only 25% 25% is is re-sold re-sold spread across across the the city city where where only
and the remaining e-Waste is thrown in toxic landfills and the remaining e-waste in thrown in toxic landfills
CO NT AIN
ER
S
TR UC
OUT: EXPORT AND RESALE
IN: e-WASTE COLLECTED IN THE CITY
KS
INPUT / OUTPUT
reused
toxins Discarded reused
where even children scavenge for valuable scrap
and even burn it, releasing and spreading toxins
discarded
MATERIAL CIRCULATION
x x x poisoning the water, land, people lagos... poisoning the water, land, andand people ofof Lagos...
now is the time to develop an effective e-waste recycling system
SCHOOL
PUBLIC
WORK
EXHIBIT
A series of strips derived from the assembly line typology serve as the basis of the design, wherein each strip handles a separate material flow. Where necessary these strips merge
LABS COMPUTER DISASSEMBLY LABS
BREAK ROOM
DISASSEMBLY LABS
together to create larger floor areas and points of transfer.
STUDENT CAFETERIA
OFFICES
ARCHIVE ROOM DISASSEMBLY LABS
LEVEL 3/4
(PEOPLE)
WORKER CAFETERIA
LEVEL 2
(CONTAINERS)
PUBLIC ENTRANCE SCHOOL ENTRANCE
South Elevation 1/16” = 1’0”
LEVEL 1
Section A
(TRUCKS)
1/32” = 1’-0”
N
ning Process
1. Initial Sorting
2. Primary Shredding
3. Secondary Shredding
Plastic
Steel
Al
Brass
Cu
Fe
Cu
Ni
4. Ferrous Metals + Plastic
5. Non-Ferrous Metals
6. Export
102nd STREET FIELD HOUSE
In 2010 the Design Workshop undertook the challenge of transforming a landmarked 1930s era field house in Riverside Park into a fully functioning comfort station and storage space as well a year-round community space for Parks events and meetings. A major challenge was the design of a durable, functional space that would stand up to heavy use while simultaneously
RE-SUBMIT
SUBMIT
REVIEW
SUBMIT
REVIEW
FEBRUARY
REVIEW
JUNE
MAY
APRIL
A MARCH
PERMIT
presenting a warm and inviting feel.
The Design Workshop 2010
2/22 3 Versions Presentation Re-submit
3/2 Community Board #7 3/3 - 3/30 Landmarks Commission
4/6 - 4/26 Public Design Commission (PDC)
3/16- 4/5 Public Design Commision (if possible)
DATE 2/22 3/2 3/3 3/16 4/5 4/6 4/26 5/1 5/15 5/30 6/15
TASK Presentation of 3 Versions Community Board #7 (CB7) Submit to Landmarks Submit to PDC (if possible) PDC Review (if submitted) Submit to PDC PDC Review Submit to DOB Resubmit to DOB DOB Permit Issued Delay of DOB Permit
5/1 - 6/1 DOB
DOB DELAY begin prep/demo
Requirements
TASK LEAD
fixed date fixed date requires CB7 approval fixed date; requires Landmarks approval fixed date fixed date; requires Landmarks approval fixed date requires CB7, Landmarks, PDC approval -
Design Workshop Architect of Record? Parks? Architect of Record? Parks? Design Workshop? Who represents the project? Design Workshop? Who represents the project? Architect of Record? -
6/15
1
2
2
RIVERSIDE PARK 102nd Street Field House
3
1
A 300
304 Riverside Drive New York, NY 10025
A 300
DESIGN TEAM:
T.O BUILDING 17' - 10 1/2"
TERRACE
THE
DESIGN
B.O.SLAB 14' - 10 1/2"
WORKSHOP
10
PARSONS THE NEW SCHOOL FOR DESIGN 25 E 13TH STREET NEW YORK, NY 10003
MAIN ROOM 08
EXIT LIGHT PLAN
EXIT LIGHT FIXTURE
ARCHITECT OF RECORD: CITY OF NEW YORK PARKS & RECREATION OLMSTED CENTER FLUSHING MEADOWS CORONA PARK FLUSHING, NEW YORK 11368
08
NORTH AND SOUTH WINGS 1' - 6"
PER TABLE 6-2 ESTABLISHED DEFINED OCCUPANCY LEGEND 1441 SQ FT/12 = 120 CAPACITY EXISTING INTERIOR PARTITION
OBSERVE
STRUCTURAL: CITY OF NEW YORK PARKS & RECREATION OLMSTED CENTER FLUSHING MEADOWS CORONA PARK FLUSHING, NEW YORK 11368
MAIN SPACE 1' - 0" GROUND LEVEL 0' - 0"
MEP:
A
CITY OF NEW YORK PARKS & RECREATION OLMSTED CENTER FLUSHING MEADOWS CORONA PARK FLUSHING, NEW YORK 11368
CRAWLSPACE
B
C
12' - 1 1/4"
D
18' - 5 1/2"
NEW INTERIOR PARTITION
E
16' - 9"
F
16' - 0"
DISPLAY GSURFACE
16' - 9 1/4"
18' - 0"
H
12' - 0 7/8"
PIVOT
B.O. CRAWL SPACE -6' - 0" 1 A 301
City of New York Parks & Recreation
3
4
A 301
A 301
111' - 7 7/8" 30' - 6 3/4"
1
3
2 A 301
49' - 6 1/4"
30' - 0 7/8"
Olmsted CenterA 500 Flushing Meadows Corona Park Flushing, New York 11368
CROSS SECTION 3 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"
OBSERVE
1 2
1
SERVICE CLOSET 07
05
2 A 300
1
1 ENGINEER COORDINATION SET A 300
3
FILING SET
06-02-2010
ENGINEER COORDINATION SET 2
07-07-2010
100% CD SET
2
5' - 5 1/8"
REVISION:
STORAGE
0"
DATE
5' -
0" 07
03
D:\My Documents\DWS10_Construction Set_100712_SYS_Sloane Brown.rvt
1
CROSS SECTION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"
14
04
PIVOT
TABLE INSIDE
1 A 430
1
DATE:
07-07-10
DRAWING BY:
DWS 2010
CHECKED BY:
1
DISPLAY 1
CONSTRUCTION PLAN A 301.00 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"
STORAGE
NORTH
FILE NO.
SURFACE SUPPORT ANGLES W SECTION
4’ HIGH TABLE SURFACE
PIVOTING DISPLAY SURFACE (WITH TABLE STORED INSIDE)
4’ HIGH TABLE SURFACE
SPACE UNDER TABLE SURFACE (TO HANG CHAIRS AND JACKETS)
SUPPORT ANGLES
2 1
SUPPORT ANGLE 4’ HIGH TABLE SURFACE
1
1
EXISTING CONCRETE STEPS ---
DISPLAY SURFACE
A200
SUPPORT ANGLE
W SECTION
05
3/16" = 1'-0"
SEAL & SIGNATURE:
2
BACK WALL DISPLAY/STORAGE SYSTEM
SECONDARY ENTRY 13
08
OBSERVE
BUILDING SECTION SCALE:
10
11
1' - 0 1/4"
SUPPORT ANGLES - 0" 5'
NEW RAMP
SPACE UNDER TABLE SURFACE (TO HANG CHAIRS AND JACKETS)
A200
STORAGE 10
1' - 0"
DRAWING TITLE:
4’ HIGH TABLE SURFACE
1' - 6"
VESTIBULE 05
B.O. CRAWL SPACE -6' - 0"
PIVOTING DISPLAY SURFACE (WITH TABLE STORED INSIDE)
08
1 A 400
W SECTION
13
STORAGE 09
MAIN ROOM 08
1' - 6"
SERVICE CLOSET 04
DESCRIPTION
CRAWLSPACE
12
DISPLAY SURFACE
MAX OCCUPANCY 74 PERSONS
05
SURFACE
GROUND LEVEL 0' - 0"
STORAGE 12
3
MECHANICAL 06
06 02
3
NO.
MAIN SPACE 1' - 0"
MAIN ENTRY 01
01
0"
STORAGE 11
7/8"
NORTH AND SOUTH WINGS 1' - 6"
04
03
5' -
B02
- 10
04-21-2010 04-30-2010
5
5' -
PRELIMINARY PERMIT SET
2
4
WOMEN'S RESTROOM 02
1' - 2 1/2"
R 2'
MAIN ENTRY 01
04-15-2010
0"
02
DESCRIPTION
B02
MEN'S RESTROOM 03
SLOPE
DATE
NO.
B.O.SLAB 14' - 10 1/2"
DISPLAY
5' -
ISSUE:
T.O BUILDING 17' - 10 1/2"
TERRACE
B02
2 A200
31' - 0 5/8"
2 A 300
23' - 1 1/2"
1
B02
18
01
WOMEN'S RESTROOM 02
A 300
B02
1/8" / 1'-0"
3
1 A 520
SECTION - SUPPORTING STRUCTURE
2
1
ELEVATION - SUPPORTING STRUCTURE
OBSERVE SURFACE
2
1
SECTION - SUPPORTING STRUCTURE
ELEVATION 2 OBSERVE SURFACE
SUPPORTING STRUCTURE
PIVOT PANEL
1
OBSERVE SURFACE
REMOVE TABLE
ISSUE:
2
1
A401
A401
3
SECURITY GRILLE HOUSING ABOVE (HOUSING TO BE REMOVED V.I.F)
A403
SECURITY GRILLE GUIDE NEW 1600 WALL SYSTEM 1 ALIGN WITH EXISTING DOOR OPENING
DATE
NO.
1 A404
NEW 1600 WALL SYSTEM 1
2 A403
1
04-15-2010
2
04-21-2010
ENGINEER
3
04-30-2010
FILING SE
4
06-02-2010
ENGINEER
5
07-07-2010
100% CD S
PRELIMIN
1'-21 2"
REVISION:
DATE
NO.
P.
Ø TY
3'-6"
EXISTING MASONRY COLUMN
DRAWING TITLE:
16'-9" V.I.F
FACADE SYSTEM The design and coordination of the facade system was one of my primary roles in the project. The treatment of the front colonnade needed to accommodate a 12-month conditioned space while regaining the aesthetic of a romantic openair pavilion. To achieve this, a set of details were developed to secure a storefront system in the space while meeting Landmarks aesthetic requirements as well as an exterior security grille required by Parks. Because all components of the facade and security grille would need to fit in a two foot space behind the arches, the installation sequence for these components also demanded careful consideration in the drafting of the details.
C
1
16'-0" V.I.F.
D
EXTERIOR DETAIL FACADE PLAN/EL SCALE: 1 2" = 1'-0"
16'-91 4" V.I.F.
E
2 A400
SEAL & SIGNATURE:
F
CH
FACADE PLAN
A
1/2"= 1'-0"
FIL
PROJECT :
RIVERSIDE PARK 102nd Street Field House
2'-2 1/8" V.I.F.
304 Riverside Drive New York, NY 10025
1'-8 5/16" V.I.F.
DESIGN TEAM:
THE
DESIGN
10
WORKSHOP
PARSONS THE NEW SCHOOL FOR DESIGN 25 E 13TH STREET NEW YORK, NY 10003
ARCHITECT OF RECORD: CITY OF NEW YORK PARKS & RECREATION OLMSTED CENTER FLUSHING MEADOWS CORONA PARK FLUSHING, NEW YORK 11368
EXISTING STEEL AND CONC. BEAM
B.O. SLAB 14'-10 1/2"
B.O. SLAB 14'-10 1/2"
SILICON CAULK
STRUCTURAL: CITY OF NEW YORK PARKS & RECREATION OLMSTED CENTER FLUSHING MEADOWS CORONA PARK FLUSHING, NEW YORK 11368 MEP:
STEEL BEAM EMBEDDED IN EXISTING CONC. BOND BEAM V.I.F. B.O. STEEL BEAM 12'-4"
CITY OF NEW YORK PARKS & RECREATION OLMSTED CENTER FLUSHING MEADOWS CORONA PARK FLUSHING, NEW YORK 11368
B.O. STEEL BEAM 12'-4" EXISTING MASONRY STRUCTURE
EXISTING MASONRY STRUCTURE
2 A403 NEW DROPPED CEILING
NEW 1600 WALL SYSTEM 1
City of New York Parks & Recreation
SECURITY GRILLE (HOUSING TO BE REMOVED V.I.F.)
1 A403
SECURITY GRILLE GUIDE BEYOND
SECURITY GRILLE GUIDE
NEW DROPPED CEILING
HORIZONTAL MULLION HEIGHT T.B.D.
NEW 1600 WALL SYSTEM 1 HORIZONTAL MULLION HEIGHT V.I.F.
T.O. EXIST. OPENING 8' 7 3/4"
Olmsted Center Flushing Meadows Corona Park Flushing, New York 11368
T.O. EXIST. OPENING 8' 7 3/4"
ALUMINUM PLATE
ALUMINUM PLATE
NEW 1600 WALL SYSTEM 1 IN EXISTING DOOR OPENING SEE A403/1
NEW 1600 WALL SYSTEM 1 IN EXISTING DOOR OPENING SEE A403/1
INTERIOR
EXTERIOR
ISSUE: NO.
GUIDE ATTACHED TO STEEL SUPPORTING TUBE, TYP.
1 A402
DATE
DESCRIPTION
1
04-15-2010
PRELIMINARY PERMIT SET
2
04-21-2010
ENGINEER COORDINATION SET
3
04-30-2010
4
06-02-2010
ENGINEER COORDINATION SET 2
5
07-07-2010
100% CD SET
FILING SET
REVISION:
B.O. FACADE 1'-0" V.I.F.
B.O. FACADE 1'-0" V.I.F.
GROUND LEVEL 0'-0"
GROUND LEVEL 0'-0"
NO.
DATE
DESCRIPTION
DRAWING TITLE:
EXTERIOR DETAILS: FACADE SECTIONS SCALE: 3 4" = 1'-0" SEAL & SIGNATURE:
DATE: 07-07-2010 DRAWING BY: DWS 2010 CHECKED BY: SLOANE
2
FACADE SECTION AT BEAM
3/4"= 1'-0"
DA DR
1
FACADE SECTION
3/4"= 1'-0"
A401.00 FILE NO.
File Path
STREET IN THE TOWER the city grows upward
The Street in the Tower is a multi-use building that takes a new spin on the ‘tower in the park’ to maximize real estate value, light, and views. Because the area is lacking in amenities for its residents, the streetscape is woven from the sidewalk up into the tower itself, providing a ramping thoroughfare of restaurants, stores, offices, and resident community areas. The density and size of the perforations on the facade GRAND correspond to program, light, STREET and views.
PIT T STREET
EXISTING PARK
ST
EA
SEWARD PARK
CORE CIRCULATION
Y WA AD O BR
RAMP
Partner: Felicia Nitu
SECTION facing North__ 1/8” = 1’ -
8am
6pm
11 / min. 3.4 / min.
18 / min. 4 / min.
5.2 / min.
7.6 / min.
2 / min. 1.2 / min.
1.6 / min. 0.8 / min.
5 / min. 1.4 / min.
3.7 / min. 1.7 / min.
10.2 / min.
13.4 / min.
8.6 / min.
6.8 / min.
4.6 / min.
4.8 / min.
Grand Street Street Grand
0/ min.
1/ min.
Willet Street Willet Street
0/ min.
0/ min.
East Broadway Broadway East
0.2/ min.
0.2/ min.
Pitt Street Street Pitt VIEWS
0/ min.
0/ min.
Grand Street Willet Street ett East Broadway Pitt Street Pitt Street
Grand Street East Broadway
260’ 250’
NO SKY EXPOSURE PLANES
Pitt Street
210’
120’
70’ 40’
OPEN SPACE
TOWER REGULATIONS
10 ‘
10 ‘ 1
13% lot footprint 44% lot coverage
MAXIMUM LIGHT EXPOSURE
FACADE ITERATIONS
TYPICAL APARTMENT LAYOUT
ENTRY POWDER
Grasshopper
BATH
KITCHEN
LIVING ROOM
LOFT
BEDROOM
FLOOR 1
FLOOR 2
RhinoScript
23
22
21
20
19
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
SHADING STRUCTURE SHADING STRUCTURE Private
Shadow
City Views
Light
Street Views
Semi-Public
Private
Public
Human Tissue
11
10
8
7
6
5
4
2
1
-1
-2
SHADOW BOX pattern experimentation
LAYERING
Shadow Box is a series of shadow-making boxes or skins that explore the self-evident and latent potential in the use of laser cutting as a method. A combination of 3D modeling and pattern experimentation was used to investigate various methods for creating a skin, resulting in a range of complexity from layered and notched surfaces to parabolic and triangulating surfaces.
PARABOLIC CURVE
UNFOLDED GEOMETRY
TRIANGULATED SURFACE
NOTCHING
SHADOW SPACE exploded framework
Inspiration from the Shadow Box Project was used to create a three-dimensional shadow space sufficiently scaled for a latent program. This Shadow Space literally pushes the boundaries of structure and skin by exploding the simple lattice frame at the core and warping it into a complex multi-layered composition of panels shading an interior ramp. The fusion of the thin, lightweight lattice and its fragmentary skin casts delicate as well as bold shadows interlacing upward movement and perception of the space.