Pushpita Das
99.
Determination of who should execute the Karbi Langpi, Kameng and Loktak Downstream projects should be speedily resolved to avoid delay and further cost escalation.
100.
The proposed power tariff regulatory authority should be brought into being as early as possible, or this might even be done separately for the Northeast as an interim arrangement, as a prelude to reorganisation of the Assam and Meghalaya electricity boards. Consumers would prefer reliable supplies and service to notional subsidies that do not really benefit them.
101.
Consideration should be given to corporatising the remaining five electricity departments in the Northeast so that they are insulated from political pressure and patronage in pricing, staffing and forward planning. There has to be a new culture if the huge power potential of the region is to be realised.
102.
External funding for power development in the Northeast has dried up barring OECF, and private investors, though interested, are shy because they are unsure about the returns. Efficient SEBs/power corporations can attract commercial borrowing, institutional lending and private investment, Indian and foreign, provided the Government is willing to underwrite these transactions particularly in regard to mega projects. We accordingly recommend that the Centre guarantee these borrowings on suitable terms and conditions related to Northeast realities and opportunities.
103.
The Brahmaputra Board should be greatly strengthened commensurate with its transcending role and responsibility in the Northeast It must have a meaningful presence in all the States, especially Arunachal where it has a major task ahead of it. The necessary funding and personnel should be made available for this purpose.
104.
The Brahmaputra Board has sought Rs 50 crores to undertake the Dihang and Subansiri cascade studies This 386