Master of Architecture Studios - Balloting Posters, Semester 2, 2022

SEMESTER 2 | 2022

MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STUDIO BALLOTING POSTERS & STUDIO LEADER BIOS

Conceptually this studio will explore the relationship between two RSSRVHG XQGHUVWDQGLQJV RI WKH ZRUOG WKURXJK VXUIDFH Hႇ HFWV DQG underlying models. We will develop a design process based on the interrelationship of AI machine learning and digital generative processes. The intention is to create a messy and intricate relationship between the two.

Through a loop of text-to-image AI techniques and the simulation of emergent processes, the studio will focus on other ways of imagining architecture beyond the known generative design DSSURDFKHV 6SHFL¿ FDOO\ E\ XVLQJ PDFKLQH OHDUQLQJ WRROV WKDW are driven by text-based prompts, we will explore the limits of description and the relationship between language and form.

The studio’s aim is not to fabricate hybrids, collages or reference GLႇ HUHQW SUHFHGHQWV EXW UDWKHU WKH VWXGLR ZLOO VHDUFK IRU VRPHWKLQJ entirely new, beyond what can be described by either language RU JHQHUDWLYH PRGHOV ,Q WKH ¿ UVW KDOI RI WKH VHPHVWHU VWXGHQWV ZLOO GHYHORS D VHULHV RI ZRUNÀ RZV H[SORULQJ IHHGEDFN EHWZHHQ language-based modelling tools and algorithmic design processes to develop a reciprocal relationship between the two. The second half of the semester will focus on the translation of this into architectural tectonics and form. No prior experience with algorithmic tools is required.

DESCRIPTIVE FORMATION MASTERS STUDIO ROLAND SNOOKS + ALAN KIM THURSDAY 5PM - 9PM LEVEL 10 LONG ROOM

| CHAMELEON | Marc Gibson | 6:30pm - 10:30pm | TUESDAY | FACE-TO-FACE | | Outline Chameleon will explore the design of complex topologies and the translation of intricate ornamentation through panelization and aggregation. This studio will follow the lineage of “Painterly Forms” & “Hereditary” studios and look at the negotiation between generative processes and top-down modelling.

This studio will explore the intentional subversion and curation of digital tools to create adventurous forms for 3D Printing. This studio will have a particular focus on the production and post processing RI SK\VLFDO PRGHOV 6WXGHQWV ZLOO FUHDWH UH¿QH DQG SRVLWLRQ D GLJLWDO WRROVHW WKDW LQWHUIDFHV ERWWRP XS DOJRULWKPLF JHQHUDWLRQ RI JHRPHWU\ DQG WRS GRZQ LQWHUYHQWLRQ WKURXJK VFXOSWLQJ 'XULQJ WKH ¿UVW SRUWLRQ of the semester students will introduced the fundamentals of parametric logic, digital sculpting and 3d print optimization to produce a wide array of digital sculptures & Architectural tectonics.

The second half of the semester will see students design a mid-rise tower that negotiates the materiality and surrounding architectural vernacular. The weekly aggregation of objects will act as a taxonomy of formal characteristics that will be referred to when designing their architectural language.

| Software No prior experience in ZBrush or Coding required. Communications 3 or equivalent Grasshopper experience is required.

| Groupwork You will work collaboratively with two classmates on a shared site however each person will produce an individual project.

| Evaluation Students will be assessed on their design, visual communication and comprehension of data structure to control layered parametric procedures. Individual folios are to be submitted at the conclusion of this subject.

| 3D Print Materials Students will be producing weekly models using 3D printers & Laser Cutting. Please note that there will be material costs for 3D printing (PLA & Resin).

| Tectonic Formation Lab The studio is part of a group of studios and electives run this semester that are aligned with the RMIT Architecture | Tectonic Formations Lab, which will collaborate through combined reviews and symposia.

| Core Techniques

| Topology Generation

| Develop Taxonomy of Sculptures

| Procedural Materials

| 3D Print Resolution

| Develop Panelization Systems

| View Past Hereditary Studio

SUBURBAN REALISM:

GROUND TOWN

WHEN: Tuesday 18:00 - 22:00 WHERE: On Campus, Building 100 LED BY: Dean Boothroyd Matthew Tibballs Olivia O’Donnell

Suburban urban Realism’s objective is to highlight the ma marginal nature of Melbourne’s outer suburban fringe in the architectural and planning community’s consciousness when it comes to imagining Melbourne’s future.

It seeks to speculate on the roles of the edge suburbs and search for a new civic and collective mission in these areas.

The series of studios under the overarching banner of Suburban Realism speculate that with a renewed civic and collective vision, Melbourne’s outer edge suburbs might rival its prized inner-city neighbourhoods. The studio will speculate on the main civic marker of identity, the Local Town Centre (LTC), through ascending scales from supermarket aisles, parking lots, connected roads and transport systems to metropolitan markers of services, infrastructure, water systems and landscape.

Semester Structure: Weeks 01 to 06 is the explorationx of a contemporary town centre through analysis of the As-Found, Precinct Structure Plans, Typology, Public Space and Representation before culminating in a mid-semester presentation through the guise of a modern-day, tech-savvy, pamphleteer.

The second six weeks will involve altering, demolishing and extending the town centre to suit the year 2050 scenario.

In Week 07 a workshop will be conducted with a group of invited industry professionals joining the students to radically speculate on future scenarios for 2050 with climate change being an agent of change.

The intent of this studio is to expand the reach of architecture and engage with the infrastructural matrix from which buildings are suspended, constructing provocations in the process which confound and force one to rethink the idea of civic ‘out there’.

Welcome to Ground Town.

HOUSING MATTERS Studio Leaders KTA Core Team: Andy Ferguson, Claire Humphreys, Kerstin Thompson, Toby Pond Location KTA Studio, 6 Lothian Street, North Melbourne Time Wednesday 4pm-8pm Site Prahran or Richmond or Flemington or South Yarra

The Victorian State Government has initiated a number of projects to deliver more social housing, aiming for 12,000 new homes in 5 years through their Big Housing Build initiative. In addition to creating new homes is an agenda for urban renewal and the potential impact of major housing projects to deliver ‘transformational change’ for both existing residents and the broader community.

The studio will use a real brief and real sites to explore models for social housing of the scale and to the brief of these government initiatives. It will be lead by KTA architects currently delivering social housing projects. Students will engage with the complexity of redeveloping existing social housing estates – whether with new buildings and/ or adaptation of existing ones – especially around amenity/ privacy/security/tenure etc.

Design outcomes will be founded on research around social housing acknowledging that innovation in public and social housing has lead to many a failed experiment both here and internationally. The degree to which this failure can be attributed to design or management and governance is complex and will be part of this early research.

We will explore the pros and cons of the adaptation and re-use of existing buildings on the estates compared with their replacement with new buildings. We will do so through consideration of some of the following conundrums: _ Design for all or design for no one? _ Is architectural neutrality even possible and it is appropriate in multi-cultural Melbourne? _ Romance of the commons – for whom? _ Regulatory formulas…what of site and contextual responsiveness and innovation? _ Beyond the necessary…what makes for homeliness? _ Repetition for efficiency and for equity… where in lies character, points of attachment?

These conundrums are not new. The focus will be on design responses to these, specifically on the spatial hardware, not on issues of programming, governance. While aware of these, they are the jurisdiction of our clients. So questions of architectural language, style, planning, materiality will be front of mind as we seek to resolve these conundrums as architects: through the drawing, the specification, construction methodology, and allocation of public monies.

Image: Wille, Peter, 1931-1971 photographer. Copyright has been assigned to the State Library of Victoria.

Conceptual Agenda

sitcom tv architecture Ann Lau

Putu Permana

tune in on tuesdays

Rhys McFarlane

Neuman Chow

6-9PM

PREMIERES AT 1/250 FLINDERS LANE

the studio.

ƚŚĞ ĐƌŝƟƋƵĞ͘

dŚŝƐ ƐƚƵĚŝŽ ŝƐ ĂďŽƵƚ ŝŶƚĞƌƌŽŐĂƟŶŐ ƚŚĞ ĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ĐŝƚLJ͕ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͕ ĂŶĚ ŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂů ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ ƚŚĞ ĐŝŶĞŵĂƟĐ ůĞŶƐ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ sitcom.

tĞ ĐŚĂůůĞŶŐĞ LJŽƵ ƚŽ ĐƌŝƟƋƵĞ ƚŚĞ ƌĞůĂƟŽŶƐŚŝƉƐ ďĞƚǁĞĞŶ ƚŚĞ ƉĞŽƉůĞ͕ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ĐŝƚLJ ŝŶ ǁŚŝĐŚ ƚŚĞLJ ůŝǀĞ͕ ĂŶĚ ƚŽ ŝĚĞŶƟĨLJ ŚŽǁ ƉƌĞĐŽŶĐĞƉƟŽŶƐ ĂďŽƵƚ ƚŚĞ ĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌ ĐĂŶ ďĞ Ă ĚƌŝǀŝŶŐ ĨŽƌĐĞ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ ŽĨ ƐƉĂĐĞƐ͘ tĞ ǁŝůů ĞdžƉůŽƌĞ Ă ͞ƚŽŽů Ŭŝƚ͟ ŽĨ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƟŽŶ ĚĞǀŝĐĞƐ ΀ŵƵůƟŵĞĚŝĂ͕ ŐĂŵĞƐ͕ ĚƌĂǁŝŶŐƐ͕ ŵŽĚĞůƐ͕ ƉƌŽƉƐ͕ ƚĞdžƚ΁ ƚŽ ĐůĞĂƌůLJ ĂƌƟĐƵůĂƚĞ ĞĂĐŚ ƉŽŝŶƚ ŽĨ ƉƵƌƉŽƐĞĨƵů ĚĞƐŝŐŶ ŝŶƚĞŶƚ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚ ƚŚĞ ƐĞŵĞƐƚĞƌ͘

TUESDAYS

dŚĞ ,ĂLJďĂůů WƌĂĐƟĐĞ ƐƚƵĚŝŽ ĂŝŵƐ ƚŽ ŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƚĞ ƚŚĞ ƐƉĂƟĂů ƋƵĂůŝƟĞƐ͕ ƐĐĞŶĞƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵƉŽƐŝƟŽŶĂů ĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ ĨƌŽŵ ƚŚĞƐĞ ƐŚŽǁƐ͘ tĞ ƐĞĞ ƚŚĞ ƐƚƌŽŶŐ ƌĞůĂƟŽŶƐŚŝƉƐ ďĞƚǁĞĞŶ ŽƵƌ ĨĂǀŽƵƌŝƚĞ ĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌƐ ŝŶƐŝĚĞ Ă ƐŝƚĐŽŵ ĂƐ Ă ĚƌŝǀĞƌ ƚŽ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉ ĂŶ ĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů ůĂŶŐƵĂŐĞ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ ŽĨ ds DĂŐŝĐ͕ ƐŬŝƚƐ ĂŶĚ mise-en-scène ŚĂƐ ƚƌĂŶƐĨŽƌŵĞĚ͘ ^Ğƚ ŝŶ ĂŶ ŝŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů ƐŝƚĞ ŝŶ DĞůďŽƵƌŶĞ͕ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ŝƐ ĞŶǀŝƐŝŽŶĞĚ ƚŽ ďĞŐŝŶ Ăƚ Ă ŵĂĐƌŽ ƐĐĂůĞ͕ ŝĚĞŶƟĨLJŝŶŐ ŬĞLJ ŶĂƌƌĂƟǀĞƐ ƚŽ ĐƌĞĂƚĞ Ă ƐƚŽƌLJďŽĂƌĚ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ďŝŐ ŝĚĞĂƐ͘ ƚŚĞ ĐŽƌĞ ĞdžƉůŽƌĂƟŽŶ͘ tŚĂƚ ŵĂŬĞƐ ƚŚĞ ďŽŶĞƐ ŽĨ ƐŝƚĐŽŵͬds ĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ͍ tĞ ĐĂŶ ƚŚĞŶ ďĞŐŝŶ ƚŽ ŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƚĞ ƐƉĂĐĞ ĂŶĚ ƌĞůĂƟŽŶƐŚŝƉƐ ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ ǀŽůƵŵĞ ŽĨ ƚLJƉŝĐĂů ƐŝƚĐŽŵ ͞ƐĞƚƐ͘͟ dŚĞ ĮŶĚŝŶŐƐ ĨƌŽŵ ƚŚŝƐ ǁŝůů ƚŚĞŶ ďĞ ŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƚĞĚ Ăƚ ŵŝĐƌŽ ƐĐĂůĞƐ ;ĂŶĚ ƐĞƫŶŐƐͿ ŽĨ LJŽƵƌ ĐŚŽŽƐŝŶŐ ŝŶ ŽƌĚĞƌ ƚŽ ĞdžƉůŽƌĞ ĂůƚĞƌŶĂƟǀĞ ŝĚĞĂƐ ŽĨ ŝŶƚĞƌĂĐƟŽŶ ĂŶĚ ůŝǀŝŶŐ ŝŶ ĂŶ ĞǀĞƌͲŐƌŽǁŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ ŐůŽďĂůŝƐĞĚ ĐŝƚLJ͕ ǁŚŝĐŚ ŚĂƐ ďĞĞŶ ĚŝƐƚŽƌƚĞĚ ǁŝƚŚ ŶĂƌƌĂƟǀĞ ĂŶĚ ĨƌĂŵŝŶŐ͘ dŚĞ ĞdžƉĂŶƐŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƟŽŶ͕ ĂŶĚ ƵůƟŵĂƚĞ ƐƟƚĐŚŝŶŐ ƚŽŐĞƚŚĞƌ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ͞ƐĞƚ͟ ǁŝůů ďĞ ƚŚĞ ŬĞLJ ŽƵƚĐŽŵĞ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ƐƚƵĚŝŽ͘

džƉůŽƌĞ ǁĂLJƐ ŝŶ ǁŚŝĐŚ ĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů ŐĞƐƚƵƌĞƐ ;ƚĞĐƚŽŶŝĐƐ͕ ƐƉĂƟĂů ĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞƐ͕ ĐƵƌĂƟŽŶƐ ĞƚĐ͘Ϳ ŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚ ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƐŝƚĐŽŵƐ ĐĂŶ ŝŶĨŽƌŵ ŵĞĂŶŝŶŐĨƵů ŽƵƚĐŽŵĞƐ ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ ƐƵďũĞĐƚ ƐŝƚĞ͘

yirramboi Gadhaba

An Arts, Cultural & Treaty Centre

You will be asked to design an arts, cultural & treaty building bg ma^ a^Zkm h_ F^e[hnkg^ l :kml Precinct. The design of Australian cities post colonization have failed to include First Nations voices, cultures and traditions within them.

The studio examines a future Melbourne where the cultures and traditions of our First Nations people are made visible within our colonized \bmr' Ma^ lmn]bh Ûml bgmh Z ebg^Z`^ h_ Australian architecture that is ideas [Zl^]% Û`nkZmbo^ Zg] ienkZeblm'

Wednesdays 1-5pm *check timetable clashes with electives

Led by Dr Christine Phillips, Stasinos Mantzis and ;hhgpnkkng` >e]^k G Zkp^^ m Ikh_^llhk <Zkherg ;kb``l The studio will draw on a range of design techniques to tackle the following design research questions: • • • • • • •

How architects can respectfully engage with Indigenous knowledge and knowledge holders within our built environment?

Tackle the notion of a colonised country and how we might design a shared future architecture charged by multiple histories and different cultures.

To consider Aboriginal notions of Country within an urban context?

How to design a cultural building vertically on a tight urban site.

How can the history and culture of the site and its surrounds inform the design of the building?

How can we add to the current civic narrative of this Arts Precinct?

How might a better understanding of the importance of the site to the people of the Eastern Kulin Nation make us consider how this new civic building should be sited within the context of Melbourne as a colonial city?

dIs'pleIsm( )nt Dz

the idea of this studio is to study how architecture in its place might be implicated in a web of intention, concession and yield typically, this would be a singular, linear relationship understood as the intention of the architect, the conceit to a brief and the yield of the site or circumstance to the form what’s established here is a distinct power relationship that I’d like to dismantle or reverse in the studio in order to understand the potential for architects to help shape a place from within, or more plainly, to be affected by the place the potential is to establish a close and continual relationship with the place, its people, ecology, culture, social structure, everything that makes it meaningful or important to recognize that architecture continues to exist well beyond the point when the architect cedes ownership to the client, and often well beyond the occupation of that client it is part of the place and continues to be affected by it and as such has a responsibility to it from the outset through this we’ll start to understand the responsibility of the architect to the place and the public and invert the typical understanding of what we do so the intention is of the place, to which the brief concedes and the architect is the one that must yield we’ll look at little bourke street in melbourne and through this act of looking become conscious of how we see we’ll develop a brief for a public building in this place and look at their effect on the other the brief will take the form of a proposition with clear intention toward the place and its public we’ll develop a concept for this place and this brief and look again at their effect on each other ZH·OO ÀQG D QHZ SODFH IRU WKLV FRQFHSW RQ D WHQXRXV VWULS RI land within the avalon coastal reserve the concept will act as a found condition ZH·OO GHYHORS D QHZ EULHI WKDW UHÁHFWV WKLV UHODWLRQVKLS we’ll develop the concept towards an outcome that should UHÁHFW WKH VLJQLÀFDQFH RI WKH SODFH DQ DUFKLWHFWXUH WKDW LV responsible to its public simone koch

priscilla langi 2022_01

tuesday 9:30am

and exp he ill ings t e w h n id rba hose t prov t eu Th eet t es no ersa. A ble to m se do ice v tolera nds a hou and v ce is d exp can , e for ll spa worl verg a sm en the . The m. s o wh for u ge ro out a loun be

the table, in ion of a of the it d d a e Th chen ental -less kit gravity led a fundam t a e no v le re b ISS, valua : it was old objects quality h to s role bility for its a und, but for it gro e, a tr n e c o൵ the l elling ongenia as the c place, in a dw ng . le gatheri ib as poss as alien

ed vent ly in as n o s n wa h, who w al tche i t ry ki Gilbre nal spat a r o n p o a ntem , by Lili excepti vement o c mo .

The 1930s , but an e g of e k in th ible coo r mappin the hom f r e r o a te rcher. H e heart a h rese brated t li reca

In parts of Melbourne’s periphery, houses cost over half a million dollars, and living there will, statistically speaking, reduce your lifespan.

W ne hen to ocla the an the ssic the tiqu whit ists l fo sta ity t e ed ook Fa rm i rk re hey i¿ce ed ho rnsw deal duc decl s of pa use, orth . Ed ed ared tid nes, wit fou ith an y ro deli h its nd utt d cle of a cate bro her erl an nd pi ad y u w À o lot nli hit or, is, va ene ble ss , .

n is i ng elli w the e d rb, Th subu is in e the myth , n th the elling b is i r u dw sub the th. my

rk, qui lar f u c to arti a p fron yet, ave at the is, as h es s this ous m i n h edroo se of a i l u ca stra er b Au mast . The e the hous . the nown unk

AFTER THE STORM...

I SEE AGAIN A WEASEL

man ura szy a l h t i w

Walter Benjamin saw in the arcades of Paris the rei¿ed form of a set of cultural, social, political, and economic anxieties that spoke back to fundamental cultural myths. I see in the Australian housing market a similar set of speculative anxieties, as decisions made about one’s home ripple o൵ into the unforeseeable future. As a typology it is unique in how it contains so much speci¿city, but is built to bear the weight of so many universalities.

In this studio students will be working with new design methodologies developed during my PhD that will enable them to work top-down, bottom-up, and side to side. With these methodologies they will be asked to address questions of myth, of composition, and of fundamental values, across di൵erent housing typologies, and suburban compositions.

In doing so the students will be critiquing a broader nonarchitectural view of the house (through myth), and the established modes of working (through composition) to reformulate an idea of the house that can be applied more Àexibly as we push forward into an uncertain century.

Composition of both the idea and the drawing, addressing the non-¿gurative and ¿gurative qualities, will be essential.

Students will work alone, and in cross-studio groups.

TUESDAY mornings 9.30-1.30 (most

ly)

LOREN ADAMS

RMIT MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE STUDIO: SEM 2, 2022

R E G U L AT O R Y N O N S E N S E : THE VIBE OF THE THING

“There is no one section, your honour.

It’s just the vibe...”

T U E S D AY S 5 P M - 9 P M , I N - P E R S O N @ R M I T D E S I G N H U B

The specific things our governing bodies, institutions, and organisations choose to regulate – and the methods they use to evaluate compliance – tell a story about what we, as a society, collectively value.

Put simply, a regulation asks two things of proposed building projects: first, “Is it any good?” – or, more precisely, “Is it good enough?” – and then, “How do we know?” The first of these questions demands consensus about what constitutes ‘good-enoughness’ (axiology), while the second demands consensus about acceptable forms of proof or evidence (epistemology, made practical with methodology).

When a regulatory clause, metric, or proxy is not (or can never be) meaningfully representative of good-enoughness, design intent provides a recalibrating force, pulling projects closer to evasive notions of acceptability that may be slippery, multifarious, or incalculable.

In practice, however, the ‘actually existing’ role of the regulation – as an organizing device for design intent, subject to the forces of neoliberalization – has shifted. Under the weight of relentless, aggressive cost-cutting and value management processes, contemporary building projects are routinely stripped of any features that do not either directly translate to an increase in profit margins or contribute to achieving regulatory compliance. As a result, compliance hurdles that once dictated bare-minimum standards of acceptability have become acceptable stopping points: the good-enoughness has become that’s-enoughness.

As the space (of contingency; of possibility; of recalibration) between design intent and bare-minimum compliance collapses, the regulation – operating as both an instance of common values and a necessary precondition of spatial production – takes on greater urgency as a site of investigation, reconfiguration and creative provocation.

Extending upon themes explored in Regulatory Nonsense I – V, this studio will continue to explore the relationship between architecture and the language of regulatory compliance. Together, we will use design to locate, blur, nudge, and renegotiate the blurry thresholds of bare-minimum compliance in a speculative world where numbers no longer exist and regulatory authorship is shared with a clumsy, poetic artificial intelligence.

We ask: What might our urban environments be like if building and planning regulations were written by poets, storytellers, artists, philosophers, an A.I.?

This semester, as we approach the proliferating suite of building and planning regulations, we also will summon Dennis Denuto’s clumsy lawyerly ramblings in the classic 1997 Australian film, The Castle: “There is no one section, your honour; it’s just the vibe...”

What, then, is ‘the vibe’ of building and planning regulation?

In this studio, you will complete two broad design tasks: 1) First, you will train a bespoke natural language processing bot on your own carefully curated fine-tuning dataset, and then use this to co-author a new regulation for the built environment.

2) Simultaneously, you will conduct a series of architectural design quasi-experiments to evidence the effectiveness, limitations, and possibilities of this new regulation – eventually culminating in a resolved and cohesive architectural project in Victoria.

Along the way, we must be nimble in our disciplinary positioning, toggling back-and-forth between the reciprocal roles of policymaker and architect; juggling the demands of rule-making (for all) and (our own) design intent.

CONSPIRACY RECAPITULATED

Conspiracy is interested in confronting and untangling the congested infrastructures that comprise the contemporary city. In this studio we refuse to see the architectural object as an isolated entity, to be shaped by an omnipotent designer, rather we direct our suspicions towards the other agents that might author our city. This studio is interested in the relationship between the physical and immaterial, the built and unbuilt, the real and unreal.

ARJUNA BENSON SEMESTER 2 WEDNESDAYS 0930

For architects, the term “infrastructures” may suggest transportation networks, plumbing systems, electrical grids, and other physical city-matter. However, this studio enfolds these archetypes with what Keller Easterling describes as “the rules governing the space of everyday life”. Invisible systems of management, design standards and legislation, political consensus and dispute, social etiquettes and behaviours, data and information, news and media, manufacturing and commerce; these are infrastructural components that fabricate and condition our reality.

The method of the conspiracy theory will be used to make sense of the totality of the city. The conspiracy theorist takes uncontroversial data points and arranges them in novel ways. Whether this arrangement is “true” or not is unimportant. What we are interested in is in what it may lay bare and in the opening it may create for action. The dwelling will act as evidence of the theory, as an actor within it or as reaction against it.

The studio will be structured as a series of esquisses, done in groups and individually.

These will include traditional architectural exercises but will also explore filmmaking and other representional techniques.

FUTURE HANNAH ROWE

ISLANDS

+ BRETT WITTINGSLOW

WEDNESDAY EVENINGS This studio will propose a new future for Herring Island, located within inner city Melbourne. The island will positioned as a new home for arts, culture and education.

An artificial island built from sludge, Herring Island has a peculiar history and place within early industrial Melbourne.

Since revegetated and oft overlooked this studio will speculate how the rich social, cultural and environmental history of the site can be unpacked and examined and ultimately balanced against new programmatic requirements. The outcomes will

endeavour to move beyond the current static nature of the island and provide a new future Movement, flux, history, material, activity, program, grain, fabric, thresholds, ground plane, peculiarities, juxtapositions, relationships and form are just some of the themes which will be explored during the semester. These themes will engage with the requirements and opportunities present when reviewing site and program; culminating in rich and varied proposals.

RMIT Classification: Trusted

Instrument Architecture MAS 2022 Masters Architecture Studio Supervisor Dr Peter Brew Tuesday Morning 9.30 “Instruments are nothing but theories materialized” (Bachelard) .

The novelty of Raymound Queneau’s “book” 100 Million poems is in the way it reimagines the idea of a book, In a conventional book pages contain lines of text and are bound, Queneau book at first appearance accepts this format and is materially identical to a conventional book in all respects other than each line is a page and it is possible to encounter each line in a different order, in a new context within the book.

It is possible to recognise in the unconventional format of 100 million poems as an invention, it facilities or allows us to encounter the world differently, there is also a discovery which takes the form of a critique with respect to the nature of the book. it is possible to think of a book content as being regulated by its architecture. That the architecture is in this sense the possibility of the book, and what the architecture of Queneau’s book demonstrates is that this is not the only possibility.

The studio aims to look at the construction of ideas and the design of architecture. The ostensible content for our study’s high density residential projects though I am open to what final form might take.

M ARCH STUDIO OUTLINE RMIT SEM 2, 2022 PAUL VAN HERK paul.vanherk@rmit.edu.au www.paulvanherk.com excx.net

This M ARCH studio is initially based on a real project being undertaken by design collective EXCX. The real project is a low-budget renovation of the store ‘Australian Stitch’ on Brunswick St, Fitzroy. The brand is relatively new and distinguished by the fact that its wares are made in Melbourne. Its interior design and presence on the street are far from distinguished however - it looks generic and is easily missed by a passer-by. It has this in common with a smattering of other basics maker-retailers in Melbourne like Denimsmith, Dejour and Qualitops. Their ‘reimbodiment’ of production and consumption into a once-more intimate relationship misses out on the attention they deserve.

With this as the starting problem, the studio will be a design-led exploration of synthetic cultural identity-creation: what symbols, artefacts and processes can be created around local manufacturing as a new form of positive patriotism? What new spaces, icons and textures can be formed between the minimalist helvetica of neoliberal global generic and the colourful brashness of protectionism and old unionism? How can the design of a store innovate on and re-define what the word ‘Australian’ means in the name of the store?

The studio will start with small design studies that draw from a number of historical research threads and culminate in designs for the actual store in mid-semester, then in the second half of semester be scaled up and projected ten years into the near future, requiring the design of a combined manufacturing and retail building located in Collingwood’s old garment district.

1

This studio investigates how architecture can affect social, cultural, and political change using the design of a School of Votes as a vehicle to explore positions on how we can curate change as architects.

The agenda of this studio is to engage with the systems in which we hold agency to affect change.

The political voting system is an obvious expression of this agenda, but the studio strives to go beyond that and investigate other systems in which we vote, in our everyday lives. Every choice we make or not make, is a vote. Ultimately, the aim of the studio is for students to develop a way to respond in the capacity of an architect to issues they care about, producing drawings and propositions that communicate clearly how we can, should, or must move forward.

Students will be introduced to a literary design process based on Plato’s Theory of Forms, organised into four parts – Object, Subject, Brief, Site – to craft a total architectural proposition.

We will encourage a discursive and rigorous framework driven by intellect, analysis and narrative to form a collective, supportive and interdependent studio culture that challenges ideological preconceptions and aspirational moorings that leave individuals and societies impotent to enact or curate change. Studio sessions will be conducted in a socratic environment, whereby students are expected to actively engage in group discussions and to share ideas and feedback. Students will work individually throughout the semester while contributing to the collective culture of the Design Studio. The studio will emphasise the use of architectural drawings and physical models to describe and represent ideas and students will develop drawings of various scales, including at least one 1:5 design detail as part of their final proposition. Inherent in the agenda of the studio is for students to think beyond the discipline of architecture and attempt to also consider the disciplines of psychology and environmental science through their designs.

RMIT & The Why Factory BiodiverCity This Master of Architecture Studio is the latest in a series of collaborations between The Why Factory @ TU Delft and RMIT Architecture. Based at TU Delft, The Why Factory (T?F) is a global think-tank and research institute led by professor Winy Maas, founding partner of MVRDV. It explores possibilities for the development of our cities by focusing on the production of models and visualisations for cities of the future.

As the global population increases and increasingly urbanises, the BiodiverCity studio will continue the development of the Why Factory’s ongoing research on maximising cohabitation between animals and humans in urban environments.

Humans and animals have always co-habituated in our cities. We often categorise our non-human cohabitants as either pets or pests, based on whether we welcome them into th space we share with them or unsuccessfully try to keep them out. However both pets and pests have one thing in common; they comprise the very small sub-set of animals that have successfully adapted to our human cantered built environments.

Developing on earlier research that investigated the urban scale impacts of maximising habituation for a much wider set of animals and plants across 14 distinct biomes; this studio will develop speculative architectural typologies that maximise habitat for all types of living things. The studio will ask what do buildings look like and how do they function if humans are not the only or perhaps even the most important occupants?

The studio will guide students through the process of formulating and visualising responses to these questions and will culminate with the production of 1:5 sectional models presenting these speculations in tangible and physical way.

TUTORS: Winy Maas (MVRDV/ The Why Factory @ TU Delft), Javier Arpa (The Why Factory @ TU Delft) & Felix Madrazzo (IND/ The Why Factory @ TU Delft) & Dr. Ben Milbourne (RMIT Architecture & Urban Design)

PROPOSED TIMELINE: Intensive: Tuesdays 6pm weeks 5-13, Thursdays 6pm weeks 9 & 14.

Face-to-face in Melbourne, with online input from Why Factory staff

Architecture

RMIT MASTER OF URBAN DESIGN SEMESTER 2 2022 RMIT MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE SEMESTER 2 2022

EXTREMELY SMALL AND VERY LOUD (A STUDIO ON RMIT, THE CITY AND THE BRUNSWICK DESIGN DISTRICT)

The urbanist that has been trained to think that urban design is about the big scale only will go hungry after graduation - it might be some time before we are designing instant cities again. The urbanist who thinks that a master plan can carry an authorial idea into the future is deluded. Time heals all, especially grand plans. This is a studio that will tackle two clichés of urban thinking directly – big scale and the master plan. In the place of bigness, we’ll test how small-scale moves can conquer large territories. In the place of a staged master plan, we’ll explore how agency, time and catalysts can be deployed to help form urban situations.

RMIT University, Moreland City Council, and the Victorian Government (Creative Victoria and DEDJTR) have undertaken to develop and grow a vibrant ‘Design District’ in the heart of Brunswick. This studio is agnostic about the Brunswick Design District (BDD) - it might be a great idea, it might also be spin. What is interesting about the proposal is that at its basis, the BDD is counterfactual – it turns the orthodox order of planning cities – big scale infrastructure and then density and then zoning and only then use - upside down. BDD will start with use – design, making, manufacturing, social enterprise and see if new infrastructure might -supercharge its density and viability.

The key focus of this studio will be an attempt to redeem Melbourne’s middling recent history of design at the scale of the precinct through an understanding of the spatial consequences of use. We will speculate on the disaggregated campus as an urban typology (including RMIT’s own) and propose arguments for designing and growing the city based on enabling infrastructure, catalytic agents and accelerated evolution. We will put our assumptions to the test by providing a spatial design that might act as a catalyst for the BDD and which will provide a kind of framework of irritation to counter the rapidly changing character of Brunswick.

The studio will be open to both the Master of Urban Design and Master of Architecture students. Group work (2 student groups) will be expected in the first 5 weeks of the semester. After that time, it will be your choice about whether to continue in groups or to work alone.

WHERE: In person! Venue TBC. WHEN: Tuesday Nights 6:00-10:00. STUDIO LEADER: Prof. Mark Jacques.

MS2

MELBOURNE STUDIO 2

RETROFIXING A’BECKETT STREET

RMIT Master of Architecture & Urban Design Studio 2022 Tuesday 6pm

GRAHAM CRIST and TOM MURATORE with special guest HELEN DUONG

HOW DID WE GET HERE? W H A T T O D O N E X T ?

This studio will work in a piece of our neighbourhood Melbourne which grew out of almost unbridled market driven development and produced super dense high rise .

A 2015 city of Melbourne report reviewed urban panning controls in this precinct and freaked out at this urban density.

Tightening of those planning controls resulted.

We will ask: Is this high rise density all bad ? And anyway, how do we fix it?

We will start with the premise of the Supertight project, that density isn't inherently a problem but might be something to strive for. So how do we make it better?

We will observe closely what's there and understand the forces that produced it (mostly financial- but also regulatory and and ownership).

We will intervene and retrofit - insert some more buildings, rethink the street, and think about open space in a radical way. Each with the aim of producing a supergreat and supertight city.

In doing this work we will create a follow-up report responding to the 2015 study.

( 0 :< 7 , 9 ) 3 6 * 2 : 940; 4\+ Z[\KPV ;\[VY! 7YVM (SPZH (UKYHZLR O[[WZ! ^^^ HSPZHHUKYHZLR JVT O[[WZ! ^^^ HPHYJO HP O[[WZ! SPUR[Y LL U+HYJOP[LJ[\YL

ONLINE INTENSIVE STUDIO *P[PLZ HYL [OL TVZ[ JVTWSL_ JVUZ[Y\J[Z VM V\Y JP]PSPaH[PVU `L[ \YIHU WSHUUPUN HUK KLZPNU VM I\PSKPUNZ HYL UV[ LUNHNPUN WYPUJPWSLZ VM JVTWSL_P[` ZJPLUJL >L ^PSS IL [HRPUN HU \YIHU TVKLS VM )HYJLSVUH :\WLYISVJRZ [V WYV[V[`WL TPU ULPNOIVYOVVKZ [OYV\NO [OL SH[LZ[ (0 TL[OVKZ >L ^PSS ZWLJ\SH[L VU L_WVULU[PHS ZVS\[PVUZ MVY UL^ ^H`Z VM SP]PUN HUK ^VYRPUN HJJLSLYH[LK I` [OL NSVIHS WHUKLTPJ \WJVTPUN YL]VS\[PVUZ PU TVIPSP[` KPZ[YPI\[LK HUK KLJLU[YHSPZLK TVKLSZ VM ZOHYLK LJVUVT` PUK\Z[Y` JSLHU HPY HUK SVJHSPaLK NYLLU LULYN` HUK MVVK WYVK\J[PVU >P[O (0 Z[\KLU[Z ^PSS IL YL PTHNPUPUN ^OH[ [OL JP[` MHIYPJ JHU IL JV KLZPNULK ^P[O NYLLU IPVTHZZ WO`ZPJZ VM HPY LTLYNLU[ TH[LYPHSP[PLZ HUK UL^ TVIPSP[` WH[[LYUZ 7YLMHIYPJH[LK [PTILY Z`Z[LTZ KYP]LU I` SVJHS KH[H HUK (0 ^PSS NLULYH[L NYLH[ KP]LYZP[` VM \YIHU HYJOP[LJ[\YHS ZLX\LUJLZ OPNOS` HKHW[P]L [V SVJHS JVUKP[PVUZ >L ^PSS IL YLMLYLUJPUN )HYJLSVUH»Z \YIHU L]VS\[PVU MYVT *LYKH»Z ]PZPVUHY` NYPK [V 6S`TWPJZ [V [OL J\YYLU[ :\WLYISVJRZ HZ ^LSS HZ )LUQHTPU )YH[[VU»Z 7SHUL[HY` *VTW\[H[PVU 3PHT @V\UN»Z 7SHUL[HY` *P[PLZ 3\K^PN /PSILYZLPTLY Z[YH[VZWOLYPJ KYH^PUNZ VM [OL JP[PLZ HUK +HUPLS 2VOSLY»Z 4LYLVSVNPJHS JP[` *VTW\[H[PVUHS ^VYRMSV^ ^PSS JVUZPZ[ VM (UKYHZLR»Z (0(9*/ ZVM[^HYL HUK (0 [VVSZ Z\JO HZ HY[PMPJPHS UL\YHS UL[^VYRZ *`JSL.HU 0THNL [V 0THNL 5L\YHS ;YHUZSH[PVU *VU]VS\[PVU 5L\YHS 5L[^VYRZ HUK [L_[ [V PTHNL Z\JO HZ +HSS , HUK 4PKQV\YUL` 7YPVY RUV^SLKNL VM 9OPUV HUK .YHZZOVWWLY PZ OPNOS` LUJV\YHNLK ;HRPUN (UKYHZLR Z LSLJ[P]L JSHZZ (0 (JJLSLYH[LK (YJOP[LJ[ PZ OPNOS` YLJVTTLUKLK :[\KLU[Z ^PSS ^VYR PU [LHTZ

Studio Schedule: 6USPUL 74 (,:; 4LSIV\YUL [PTL 4VUKH` [O 6J[ ;O\YZKH` [O 6J[ 4VUKH` 6J[ ;O\YZKH` 6J[ 4VUKH` 5V] YL]PL^

6USPUL 74 (,:; 4LSIV\YUL [PTL 4VUKH` Z[ 5V] ;O\YZKH` [O 5V] 4VUKH` [O 5V] 4VUKH` [O +LJ YL]PL^ ;O\YZKH` [O +LJ 4VUKH` [O +LJ 4VUKH` [O +LJ YL]PL^ F MPUHS 4VUKH` [O 1HU MPUHS WYVK\J[PVU WVY[MVSPV MLLKIHJR

small vessels: 7KH HQHUJ\ LV SDOSDEOH ZLWK WKH H[SHULHQFH DQG FRPPRQDOLW\ RI ´WLPHµ XQLI\LQJ JURXSV WKURXJK GLVFRYHU\ DQG DQ DJLOH VHQVH RI WKH FXULRXV ¶6QRZELUG· RQFH D WHUP XVHG WR GHVFULEH PLJUDWRU\ WULSV XS DQ GRZQ WKH $PHULFDQ FRDVW QRZ UHIHUV WR ¶SUH WLUHPHQW· ZRUNHUV DV WKH\ FKDVH HPSOR\PHQW DYRLGLQJ WKH ZLQWHU PRQWKV JDLQLQJ IUHH DQG ÁDW SDUNLQJ DV SDUW RI WKHLU VKRUW WHUP FRQWUDFW ZLWK :DOPDUW LQ DGGLWLRQ WR XQPHWHUHG DFFHVV WR SDUDFHWDPRO

tree change>sea change>me me change 7KH JURXS·V IROORZ F\FOHV DQG WKH\ JDLQ FDPSLQJ DFFHVV KRZHYHU FRPSURPLVHG LW PLJKW EH LQ UHODWLRQ WR IDUPLQJ SURGXFWLYH DQG UHFUHDWLRQDO VHDVRQV &RPLQJ RXW RI WKH VKDGRZV KDV WKLV EHFRPH WKH VHHGLQJ RI DQ PHGL DJUDULDQ UHDOLW\" ´$GYHQWXUH EHIRUH GHPHQWLDµ ¶6PDOO YHVVHOV· ZLOO EH D VWXGLR WKDW LQYHVWLJDWHV WKH QDUUDWLYHV RI WKHVH JURXSV XQWLO QRWLFH RI VRPHWKLQJ XQIRUJLYLQJ EHFRPHV <RXU PLGVHPHVWHU ZLOO FDSWXUH WKLV VWRU\ 'HVLJQ IRU GHFOLQH LV DQ DWWLWXGH D JRYHUQDQFH DQG PRGHO RI FDUH 6HFRQG SKDVH ZLOO H[SORUH VXSHUDQQXDWLRQ YV DVSLUDWLRQ YV SDOOLDWLRQ 7KH IROORZLQJ ´FRPPXQLWLHV YV DVSLUDWLRQ YV SDOOLDWLRQ 7KH IROORZLQJ ´ FRPPXQLWLHVµ ZLOO SURYLGH WKH IUDPHZRUN LQ WKH µ ZLOO SURYLGH WKH IUDPHZRUN LQ WKH H[SORUDWLRQ RI TXHU\ 471 :KDW LV WKH DUFKLWHFWXUH RI WKLV SRVVLEOH ORQJHYLW\ IXWXUH" *XHVW VSHDNHUV FULWLFV \HV

$PD]RQ FDOO WKHLU VXUJH VWDII ´FDPSHUIRUFH µ :LWK QR À[HG DVVHW WKH DOO SHUVRQ FHQWUHG :LQQHEDJR SURYLGHV VFDOHG GRZQ ELJ ER[ FDUH FKRLFH 7D[ JHWV VXEPLWWHG )DFHERRN LV XSGDWHG 9DQ OLIH <·QRZ *UDQQLH DQG WKH gUDQG NLGV gDS \HDU ,QWHUgggHQHUDWLRQDO

FRPPXQLW\ RI DFWLRQ FRPPXQLW\ RI SUDFWLFH FRPPXQLW\ RI SODFH FRPPXQLW\ RI LQWHUHVW FRPPXQLW\ RI FLUFXPVWDQFH FRPPXQLW\ RI FLUFXPVWDQFH

$SSUHFLDWLYH LQTXLU\ :DUPBGDWD )DLOXUH GHPDQG OHVVBFDJHBPRUHBDJH IXWXUHSUHVHQW SUDFWLFDO JXLGHVBIRUBWKHBFXULRXV

7XWRU 6LPRQ 'U\VGDOH :HGQHVGD\ SP %H FXULRXV

PUBLICS

Practice Studio What makes public architecture, public?

Having a way of exploring this question through architecture is the theme of the studio and extends the debates and questions that we ask within our practice.

Lyons designs projects across the ‘public realm’ which can easily be listed as typologies; education, research, healthcare, justice, civic spaces, libraries and so forth. The other way we can describe these projects is that they are for students, creators, for the well and the soon-to-be well, for the lost, for the migrant, and for the Indigenous community.

As architectural typologies these buildings bring their weight of history, function, and expectation of how they should look and who they’re for. These are great starting points for learning through and contesting these architectures. We argue, and will explore in the studio, that designing for culture starts with contesting the typology with ‘publics’ – multiple ideas of who the building is for and what it could mean.

The ideas that ‘cut across’ these projects are cultural – an interest in the institution, history, arts, politics, identity, and everyday experiences of the city and its publics. Using these lenses the studio will analyse these publics, how they use the city, and then challenge the structures of the typology to design truly cultural buildings.

How broadly can public architecture be ‘opened up’? The ‘public’ is not a monolithic idea –our politics, as we are told has increasingly become, is fragmented and interest-driven, but also diverse, complex, and confounding to making a singular idea of public architecture. That’s how we like it.

The studio project and site How can a project be designed to connect simultaneously with different ‘publics’?

The studio project will be a new hybrid civic centre in central Melbourne. The city has changed through two years of being abandoned and underused. New spaces have been created in the city in which a civic centre comprising cultural, commercial, and community programs, will negotiate how these publics are designed together. .

Professor Carey Lyon, Nina Wyatt, Vicky Li, Adam Pustola and Lyons studio guests

Wednesday 6 – 10pm Lyons Studio - Level 3, 246 Bourke St, Melbourne

RMIT Master of Architecture Design Studios Studio Leader Bios

RMIT Master of Architecture Design Studio Coordinators Dr Christine Phillips is a non-indigenous architect, educator and writer who is passionate about how history, culture and understandings of place and Country can inform our built environment.

Patrick Macasaet is Lecturer and PhD candidate at RMIT Architecture and Principal of Superscale Architecture.

Design Studio: Yirramboi Gadhaba w: www.oopla.org ig: @x10phillips e: christine.phillips@rmit.edu. au

Design Studio: Fear Awe Wonder: Mattermeta (BAS) w: superscale.com.au ig: @superscale e: patrick.macasaet@rmit. edu.au

RMIT Master of Architecture Program Manager Dr John Doyle is RMIT Architecture Program Manager, President of the Association of Architecture Schools of Australasia and Director of Common.

w: commondesign.com.au ig: @common_gram e: john.doyle@rmit.edu.au

Loren Adams is disciplinary promiscuous spatial practitioner, technologist, and educator. She is currently a Doctoral Fellow with the Melbourne Centre for Cities at the University of Melbourne and sessional teacher at RMIT.

Professor Alisa Andrasek is a Professor of Design Innovation at RMIT.

Design Studio: Regulatory Nonsense: The Vibe of the Thing ig: @lorenfrances

Design Studio: AI SUPERBLOCKS w: alisaandrasek.com w: www.aiarch.ai w: linktr.ee/nDarchitecturev

Nic Bao is a registered Architect and Lecturer at the School of Architecture and Urban Design, RMIT University.

Arjuna Benson is Graduate of Architecture currently working at Sibling Architecture.

Design Studio: Coral ig: @nic_bao

Design Studio: Conspiracy Recapitulated

Peter Bickle is Principal at ARM Architecture.

Dean Boothroyd RMIT Bachelor of Architecture, 30+ years of industry experience, 9 Suburban Realism Studios in RMIT Masters of Architecture, Co-founder M@Studio.

Design Studio: ARM Practice Studio. No Home, No Country, No Place to Live w: armarchitecture.com.au ig: @armarchitecture

Design Studio: Suburban Realism: Ground Town ig: @mat_studio_architects

Dr Peter Brew studied architecture at RMIT in the late 1980s, practiced architecture and returned to RMIT in 2015 as a PhD candidate and faculty member since 2017. He is committed to reimagining the possibility of architecture.

N’arwee’t Professor Carolyn Briggs AM is a Yaluk-ut Weelam and Boon Wurrung Elder who enjoys sharing her knowledge and stories with architecture students and has engaged with the built environment with many of Melbourne’s landscape and architecture practices.

Design Studio: Yirramboi Gadhaba

Design Studio: Instrument Architecture

RMIT MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE - DESIGN STUDIO DESIGN STUDIO LEADER BIOS

Neuman Chow is Graduate of Architecture at Hayball.

Neuman is interested in the microcosms of different urban conditions in cities that have been impacted by architectural design from a micro to macro scale.

Steven Chu is the Founding Director of Alter Atlas and a practising architect registered with the Architects Registration Board of Victoria.

Design Studio: Hayball Practice Studio.

Sitcom TV Architecture w: hayball.com.au ig: @hayball_arch

Design Studio: Vote ig: @alteratlas

Associate Professor Graham Crist is Director of Antarctica and RMIT Master of Urban Design Program Manager.

Simon Drysdale Driven by enthusiasm, passion & inventiveness. I have typically worked in teams unified & driven by deep ecological & social outcomes. I have a particular lens on the spatial experience of place and how the spectrum of care can be enhanced through built form.

Design Studio: Small Vessels

Design Studio: Retrofixing A’Beckett Street ig: @antarctigram alteratlas

Moyshie Elias is a practicing Graduate of Architecture (M.Arch), with over a decade of experience teaching at RMIT, University of Melbourne and Monash University.

Andy Ferguson is Senior Architect at Kerstin Thompson Architect.

Design Studio: Another World on the Merri

Design Studio: KTA Practice Studio. Housing Matters w: kerstinthompson.com ig: @kerstin_thompson_ architects

Marc Gibson is an RMIT Architecture Associate Lecturer & Tectonic Formation Lab Digital Lead where he teaches subjects in the technology and techniques cluster with a focus on algorithmic design.

Tilly Glascode is an artist and librarian working and living in Melbourne/Naarm whose practice revolves around creative approaches to community learning, imagination, and experimentation through librarianship, research, workshops, publishing, and art making.

Design Studio: Another World on the Merri

Design Studio: Chameleon ig: @marcwgibson ig: @tectonicformationlab

Claire Humphreys is Associate at Kerstin Thompson Architect.

Design Studio: KTA Practice Studio. Housing Matters w: kerstinthompson.com ig: @kerstin_thompson_ architects

Professor Mark Jacques is an Urban Designer and Landscape Architect and director of Openwork. In 2015, Mark was appointed Professor of Architecture (Urbanism) Industry Fellow within RMIT’s School of Architecture and Urban Design.

Design Studio: Extremely Small and Very Loud ig: @_openwork

Alan Kim is a Ph.D. Candidate at RMIT Architecture | Tectonic Formation Lab (Computational Design and Advanced Fabrication).

Simone Koch is a a registered architect working at Workshop Architecture. She has taught as a sessional tutor for over 10 years in architectural design, technology, and professional practice at RMIT Architecture at a Master’s level.

Design Studio: Descriptive Formation ig: @alan_arch_kim ig: @tectonicformationlab

Design Studio: Displacement

Leon Koutoulas is a Graduate of Architecture at ARM Architecture and an RMIT Architecture alumnus.

Ann Lau is Director of Hayball.

Design Studio: ARM Practice Studio. No Home, No Country, No Place to Live w: armarchitecture.com.au ig: @armarchitecture

Design Studio: Hayball Practice Studio.

Sitcom TV Architecture w: hayball.com.au ig: @hayball_arch

Dylan Li is Project Lead and Architect at ARM Architecture.

Vicky Li is an architect at Lyons, specializing in health planning and design, with an interest in the role that design plays in enhancing the wellbeing and experience of the occupiers of a building.

Design Studio: ARM Practice Studio. No Home, No Country, No Place to Live w: armarchitecture.com.au ig: @armarchitecture

Design Studio: Lyons Practice Studio. Publics w: www.lyonsarch.com.au ig: @lyonsarchitecture

RMIT MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE - DESIGN STUDIO DESIGN STUDIO LEADER BIOS

Professor Carey Lyon is one of the Founding Directors of Lyons, and a leader in design within Australia for the award-winning projects he has led and co-led, his longstanding role as Professor of Architecture at RMIT University and peer-elected positions for national architecture bodies.

Design Studio: Lyons Practice Studio. Publics w: www.lyonsarch.com.au ig: @lyonsarchitecture

Felix Madrazzo is a partner in IND [Inter.National.Design] an architecture and urbanism practice founded in 2007 in Rotterdam. He is co-founder of Supersudaca, a collective of architects from Latinamerica conducting research on contemporary intersections of society and territory.

Design Studio: BiodiverCity (The Why Factory) w: internationaldesign.nl ig: @ind_inter.national.design

Professor Winy Maas is founding partner of MVRDV and leads The Why Factory (T?F) based at TU Delft - a global think-tank and research institute. It explores possibilities for the development of our cities by focusing on the production of models and visualisations for cities of the future.

Stasinos Mantzis is a practicing architect for 20 years. Stas is an experienced registered architect and educator with an interest in how culture and cultural knowledge can be integrated in all aspects of the built environment.

Design Studio: BiodiverCity (The Why Factory) w: thewhyfactory.com ig: @thewhyfactory_winy. maas

Design Studio: Yirramboi Gadhaba ig: @stasman

Rhys McFarlane is Rhys is interested in the weird parts of architecture that communities can use as a framework to adapt and grow.

Design Studio: Hayball Practice Studio.

Sitcom TV Architecture w: hayball.com.au ig: @hayball_arch

Dr Ben Milbourne is an architect and academic based in Melbourne. He is a Senior Lecturer at RMIT University where he is engaged in research on the application of advanced manufacturing in architecture and the future fabric of Australian cities.

Design Studio: BiodiverCity (The Why Factory) w: commondesign.com.au ig: @benmilbourne_ ig: @common_gram

Thomas Muratore is a registered architect and Associate Lecturer at RMIT Architecture.

Olivia O’Donnell is a University of Melbourne Graduate of Masters of Landscape Architecture, industry experience at Hassell and Bush Projects.

Design Studio: Retrofixing A’Beckett Street

Design Studio: Suburban Realism: Ground Town

Putu Permana As a keen advocate of how design can be clearly communicated, Putu utilises and regularly explores the application of parametric design and technology, and how they can strengthen the articulation of design concepts Design Studio: Hayball Practice Studio.

Sitcom TV Architecture w: hayball.com.au ig: @hayball_arch

Tobias Pond is Senior Associate at Kerstin Thompson Architect.

Adam Pustola is a Principal at Lyons and a Design Architect who specialises in the creative and strategic development and delivery of complex public and institutional projects, with a broad interest in culture, communities, and cities.

Hannah Rowe is a project architect at BKK. She investigates modes of sustainability through passive design and use of materials.

Design Studio: Lyons Practice Studio. Publics w: www.lyonsarch.com.au ig: @lyonsarchitecture

Design Studio: Future Islands

Associate Professor Roland Snooks is the director of the RMIT Architecture | Tectonic Formation Lab and the architecture practice Studio Roland Snooks.

Laura Szyman is a PhD candidate and tutor at RMIT University, currently investigating housing and the periphery in Melbourne. https://notafossil.cargo.site/

Design Studio: Descriptive Formation ig: @rolandsnooks ig: @tectonicformationlab

Design Studio: After the storm, I see again a weasel. w: notafossil.cargo.site

Adjunct Professor Kerstin Thompson is Director of Kerstin Thompson Architects and an RMIT Architecture Adjunct Professor.

Matthew Tibballs is an RMIT Architecture alumnus, 4 years of industry experience with McBride Charles Ryan and Edition Office.

Design Studio: KTA Practice Studio. Housing Matters w: kerstinthompson.com ig: @kerstin_thompson_ architects

Design Studio: Suburban Realism: Ground Town

RMIT MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE - DESIGN STUDIO DESIGN STUDIO LEADER BIOS

Design Studio: KTA Practice Studio. Housing Matters w: kerstinthompson.com ig: @kerstin_thompson_ architects

Conor Todd is an architect whose practice comprises design, research, writing and teaching.

Paul van Herk is an experienced architect and currently a PhD candidate at RMIT University, where he also teaches history and design. He is a founding director of design studio EXCX.

Design Studio: Seeing Things

Design Studio: Australian Stitch w: excx.net w: www.paulvanherk.com ig: @__excx

Brett Wittingslow is a director of small firm with a keen interest in contextual specificity.

Nina Wyatt is an architect at Lyons working on public and institutional facilities in the research, tertiary education, and healthcare sectors.

Design Studio: Future Islands w: bw-a.com.au ig: @birthisel_wittingslow

Design Studio: Lyons Practice Studio. Publics w: www.lyonsarch.com.au ig: @lyonsarchitecture