Institutional Framework for Sustainable Development •
We urge decision makers to seize the opportunity of Rio+20 to develop a clear and ambitious roadmap for institutional change at all levels and bring about fundamental reform of current sustainable development and environmental governance within the next decade.
•
Policies and decision making should be based on the best available natural science, social science, economic science, uptodate engineering criteria and state of the art technology. Policy making must also make full use of scientific advances and technological, economic and social innovation. Efforts to improve the institutional framework for sustainable development at all levels, and international environmental governance institutions, must therefore include strengthening of science,engineering and policy links, and strengthening the science-base and engineering capacitywithin all institutions.
•
Proposals should be explored for international multistakeholder technology assessment mechanisms to evaluate the potential environmental, health, social and economic impacts of existing and new and emerging technologies, based on risk and vulnerability assessments or, if such assessments cannot be made, on the precautionary principle.
•
An adequate regional governance structure for science, engineering, technology and innovation could be established by: o building partnerships with all major regional and global players; o involve international and regional non-government professional science and engineering organizations o developing and implementing instruments for regional R&D co-operation; o incorporating information systems to support decision-making, including repositories of science, engineering, technology and innovation, and policy information for social inclusion; o facilitating the establishment of problem-oriented networks for targeted research activities towards sustainable development; o contributing to the development of sustainable development indicators, including exact and natural science, engineering and technological, and social dimensions.
New and emerging challenges •
Concerted, global and immediate action is needed to reduce the risk of fundamentally disrupting the stability of the Earth system, with consequences for global economic and political systems. Actions to enhance the resilience and decrease the vulnerability of human communities are also urgently needed. This must be accompanied by concerted global and enhanced action aimed at bridging the development gap between North and South and eradicating poverty, taking into account a growing world population.
•
Specific topical priorities which require urgent action include: climate change, food security, water security, energy security, biodiversity loss, disaster risk reduction, and sustainable consumption and production patterns, with an overarching goal of human wellbeing, social equity and environmental and economic sustainability.
•
Other immediate challenges to be addressed include: ocean acidification, pollution and overfishing; disruption of the nitrogen and phosphorus cycles; global chemical pollution; deforestation; and megacities and urbanization; all of which need action based on the latest
3