Seven Estates

Page 77

In some cases these public funds were supplemented by private and philanthropic funding and, as already mentioned, investment by the latter was especially large in Fatima Mansions, it amounted to the equivalent of approximately €4,500 per household in that estate in 2006. ABIs in Moyross received funds from a philanthropic foundation established by the businessmen JP McManus and by the Dell computer company, although we were unable to capture the value of this investment. As mentioned above, in Deanrock and Cranmore the private and philanthropic sectors did not make a significant contribution to funding area based services.

4.5

Impact

As outlined earlier, information on inputs to area-based initiatives at estate level is patchy and difficult to fill in with any degree of completeness. It is scarcely surprising, then, that no rigorous assessment can be made of the impact of these initiatives. Writing in 2003, Haase and McKeown found that ‘little is known about the actual impact of the area-based Partnerships and even less about the comparative value of different approaches to tackling poverty and deprivation’ (Haase and McKeown 2003, p. iii). Their call for a more scientific approach to monitoring has since gone largely unheeded and the information needed for effective monitoring of programmes is still largely absent. The present study has established that the scale of initiatives deployed in each estate is in most cases collectively large enough to have substantial impact. This in itself is significant since it eliminates the possibility that the programmes were too small to make a real difference. However, it was beyond the scope of a point-in-time study such as ours to generate the trend data and control variables that would have been necessary to provide well-grounded impact assessment. Nevertheless, we can offer some broad comment on a range of issues connected with impact. We do this first by presenting statistical indicators that, taken together with national evaluations of the ABIs and local interviews with activists who implement initiatives in the estates, throw some light on the possible effects of these initiatives. In addition, we comment on three characteristics of these programmes which bear heavily on their effectiveness, namely, their targeting, design and governance.

Statistical indicators Indirect evidence on the possible impact of area-based programmes can be derived by examining change in statistical indicators of deprivation at electoral district (ED) level for the ten area-based programmes that adopted the ED as their spatial unit. For each of 77


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

4.6Interventions through social housing

11min
pages 86-91

5.2Recommendations

8min
pages 96-100

REFERENCES

8min
pages 101-105

Governance

5min
pages 83-85

Strong Spatial Targeting, 1996 and 2006

7min
pages 79-82

4.5Impact

4min
pages 77-78

4.4Scale of spending in estates

4min
pages 75-76

4.3Estate Level Picture: inventory and sources of funding

6min
pages 63-65

Social Inclusion Measures, 1996 and 2006

6min
pages 60-62

Measures in Cranmore, 2006

2min
page 66

3.4Conclusion

2min
pages 53-54

in four estates, 2006

2min
page 74

3.3Variations between and within estates

26min
pages 40-52

1.4Aims and design of follow-up study

6min
pages 16-18

1.3Rationale for the follow-up study

4min
pages 14-15

in which the seven study estates are located, 1996-2006

4min
pages 37-39

3.2Impact on the seven estates

2min
page 36

Targeting and Impact of Area-Based Interventions with

4min
pages 9-11

2.2Area-based interventions: origins and policies

8min
pages 23-26

Current expenditure on area-based programmes

2min
page 8

2.3Rationale for area based interventions

16min
pages 27-34
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.