PHOTO/DENNIS MYERS
The odds got a little longer on the state grants program functioning in this school year.
If seniority prevails A headline of the Indian Country Today Media Network put the Oregon occupation in perspective: “Oregon Militia Seizes Paiute Territory.” A group headed by Nevadan Ammon Bundy seized a federal government building on the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon on Jan 2. The refuge was formed from Northern Paiute territory in 1908. The Paiutes had been ejected from the land in 1878. In fact, Field Marshal Bundy—as Indian Country Today has referred to young Ammon—is the son of Cliven Bundy, who staged a standoff at his Clark County ranch in 2014, complaining that his family had held that land long before the Bureau of Land Management arrived in Nevada, which was not true. Indian Country Today reports that Cliven’s ranch, too, is in Southern Paiute territory.
Money distributed The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has awarded more than $1.96 million in diabetes program funding to tribal governments around Nevada. The Duckwater Shoshone Tribe, Las Vegas Paiute Tribe, Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of Duck Valley and the Reno-Sparks Indian Colony are recipients. The U.S. Department of Transportation has awarded more than $437,000 in grants to improve transportation and economic development opportunities for the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone and the Yerington Paiute Tribe.
Flu too Nevada has the highest flu rate in the nation, at least if a ranking produced by Walgreen’s Drugs is to be believed. Nevada placed first, followed by Oklahoma and then Arizona. “The Walgreens Flu Index is compiled using retail prescription data for antiviral medications used to treat influenza across Walgreens locations nationwide,” said a statement form the company. “The data is analyzed at state and geographic market levels to measure absolute impact and incremental change of antiviral medications on a per store average basis, and does not include markets in which Walgreens has fewer than 10 retail locations.”
Novel set at desert lake Pyramid Lake may not be recognizable in Pyramid Lake by Paul Draker, a new science fiction novel. The serene desert lake is the unlikely site for a murder mystery and a secret government facility. The protagonist at a DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) laboratory turns his computer—named Frankenstein—loose for all the right reasons and then must deal with the consequences. Kirkus Reviews: “After his ecological thriller (New Year Island, 2013), Draker has based his new novel in sci-fi, but he dabbles in multiple genres, including action and espionage. ... A familiar sci-fi tale but one that Draker paints in his own profound and original colors.”
Hage case returns The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled Jan 15 that prominent Nevada rancher Wayne Hage and his family illegally grazed cattle on public land and are subject to fines. The court was also unusually critical of U.S. District Judge Robert Clive Jones, whose ruling the Ninth overturned. At issue was a dispute over whether the Hage family needed grazing permits or whether its water rights on public land sufficed. Jones ruled for the Hages. The Ninth overturned him. Jones “grossly abused the power of contempt” when he held federal officials in contempt of court for enforcing the law, the ruling said. It transferred the case out of Jones’ court. The court quoted a previous opinion that faulted “the most tyrannical [ judicial] licentiousness.” Wayne Hage, now deceased, was a leading figure in disputes between Western ranchers and the federal government. The case is Seley; Williams vs. Estate of E. Wayne Hage, 13-17039.
—Dennis Myers 8 | RN&R |
JANUARY 21, 2016
Stay in school Judge slows down advance of school grants A state district judge has brought Nevada’s school grants program to a halt with an injunction requested by a by parents group. Dennis Myers Nevada District Judge James Wilson Jr. issued the injunction on Jan. 11, and gave his reasons in a detailed ruling. He acted in a lawsuit brought by seven parents, members of the parents group Educate Nevada Now. Their target is Senate Bill 302, approved by the Nevada Legislature at its session last year. The measure pays parents to take their children out of public school.
“Plaintiff parents have demonstrated irreparable harm.” James Wilson Jr. Nevada district judge Under the program, money from the state’s per-pupil expenditure for public schools—$5,100 to $5,700—is given to parents for use in educating their children outside the public school system. The funding is not limited by Judge Wilson’s ruling income. Steve Wynn would be can be read at our as eligible as any other parent. In Newsview blog. addition, the program has turned out to effectively be limited to upper income families because most Nevada private schools charge
more than is made available to the parents by the state—and lower income people are less able to make up the difference. As a result, nearly all applications for school grants have come from affluent addresses, according to the Reno Gazette-Journal. Other states with similar programs, such as Arizona, Tennessee and Florida, either limit funding to low-income families or limit it in other ways, such as to disabled students. A second lawsuit is still pending. That one, filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada, charged the payments are a subsidy to religion. Most Nevada private schools are religious. Supporters of S.B. 302 say by giving the money to the parents instead of directly to the schools, it does not support religion. But the Educate Nevada Now lawsuit, on which Judge Wilson ruled, took a different tack. It argued principally that 302 diverts money that is reserved by the Nevada Constitution solely for use by the legislature for public school funding. If there were conservatives waiting to attack any interference with 302 as a breach of judicial restraint, Wilson’s opinion anticipated them. The judge wrote that “the issues before [me] do not include the educational or public policy merits” of the legislation. Thus, he was not substituting his judgment for the legislature’s on whether the program was advisable or useful.
Rather, he was deciding whether it is in compliance with provisions of the Nevada or U.S. constitutions. In case anyone missed the point, he included a little paean to judicial restraint: “The educational and public policy issues were debated and voted upon by the legislature and approved by the governor. Courts have no super-veto power, based upon public policy grounds, over legislative enactments. Therefore, this court cannot consider whether the SB 302 provisions for education savings accounts are wise, workable or worthwhile.” Wilson also said the burden of showing that 302 is unconstitutional is on the parents. The parents who sued argued that 302 violates Article 11, the education section of the Nevada Constitution, by violating four clauses in that article—sections 2, 3, 6.1, and 6.2. The state constitution requires the legislature to decide how much money is needed to support the public schools and then fund them at that level. There is a formal process for deciding what that level of support is, and the lawmakers then fund the Distributive School Account (DSA) at that level. Once that money is allocated to the DSA, it is all but sacrosanct. It can’t be diverted to law enforcement, say, or fish and game programs. The lawmakers had found that, for the current biennium of 2015 to 2017, $5,710 per pupil would be required in the first year and $5,774 in the second year, and the lawmakers put more than $2 billlion in the DSA to cover those costs. Wilson found that the parents were wrong that section 2 and 3 of the Nevada constitution were violated by 302. They had argued that section 2 created an alternative school system and used public school funds to pay for it. They had also argued that section 3 moneys are needed to make the program work. Wilson ruled that the program can function without section 3 funding. But on sections 6.1 and 6.2, Wilson found the parents were on sounder ground. He wrote, “Sections 6.1 and 6.2 require the legislature to set aside or assign money to be used to fund the operation of the public schools, to the exclusion of all other purposes. Because some amount of general funds appropriated to fund the operation of the public schools will be diverted to fund education
