by Dennis Myers
InvestIgatIon accelerated Attorneys for Cathy Woods—freed from prison by DNA testing after being twice convicted of murdering a University of Nevada, Reno student—will be moving ahead with deposing witnesses and evidence gathering after U.S. Magistrate Valerie Cooke gave her permission. The magistrate halted that kind of work while other questions were settled, but revised her order when attorneys argued that various players in the case are dying off. Woods is suing for compensation after spending more than a quarter century in prison for a 1976 crime that prosecutors in 2015 conceded she did not commit, the murder of Michelle Mitchell of Reno. The lawsuit was filed against the city, the county and various officials, including police officers, and makes accusations that she was coerced into confessing. However, Woods made her first confession to a Louisiana mental hospital employee before Nevada officials ever knew she existed. During a therapy session while a patient at a Shreveport facility, Woods described committing a murder in Reno—an event she presumably learned of from news coverage while living in the Truckee Meadows. The hospital notified officials in Nevada. Subsequently, Woods was questioned by investigators from Nevada. Last year, her lawsuit was filed and argued she was in no condition to consent to being questioned by police. The suit also contends that her confession and interrogations—which led to her conviction—were “not memorialized or written down in any way” and were not recorded. In 2015, Washoe County District Attorney Chris Hicks said her confession diverted investigators’ efforts from other productive lines. “Cathy Woods was not on anybody’s radar until she brought it on herself. … Investigations stopped into other people and began into Cathy Woods,” he said.
FIrIngs prompt unIon charges In what critics say was an action against labor union organizing, Sierra Nevada College has fired six instructors. It’s a charge the college denies. “It was a data-driven decision, not a political one,” college president Alan Walker told the Tahoe World. “I believe I was fired for trying to unionize the faculty,” said instructor Dan Aalbers, vice chair of the faculty council. The departed professors are psychologist Aalbers, who has lectured on the American Psychological Association’s involvement with U.S. torture; English instructor and Sierra Nevada Review editor Courtney Berti; philosophy professor Samantha Bankston, an organizer of the college’s French film festival; art instructor Daniel Kelly; art historian Pierette Kulpa; and author and poet Jared Stanley. “Everyone let go is someone who has spoken out, taken a public position criticizing the administration,” Aalbers told the World. “It’s a mix of a couple of issues,” Walker said. “One is the changing demographic of high schools around the county … The other one is the increased focus that society has, that the government has, on the return on investment of education.”
JaKe hIghton At press time we learned of the death of our colleague, UNR journalism professor emeritus Jake Highton. Highton was author of a journalism textbook and occasional RN&R contributor. We will have an obituary in our next edition.
—Dennis Myers
8
|
RN&R
|
08.10.17
State legislators Julia Ratti (left), Skip Daly, Amber Joiner, and Teresa Benitez Thompson at a legislative town hall. PHOTO/DENNIS MYERS
Who’s in charge? Political parties still drive the election system at a legislative town hall with five legislators at Cathexes last month, Washoe County Sen. Julia Ratti told the audience, “If there’s one thing we should have learned from the Bernie Sanders/Hillary Clinton campaign, it’s that the public is tired of anointments.” Someone apparently didn’t get the word. On July 6 at 6:17:53 a.m., Democrat Jacky Rosen—a U.S. House member in Clark County— announced her candidacy for U.S. Senate in an email. Later that morning, at 11:20:28 a.m., Democratic U.S. Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto endorsed Rosen’s candidacy, although there were reports that other Democrats might also run. At 12:50:10 p.m., U.S. Rep. Ruben Kihuen endorsed Rosen. From D.C. at 1:36:06 p.m. came word that the Democratic Senatorial
Campaign Committee was taking sides in the primary by endorsing Rosen. First thing the next morning, at 6:04:06 a.m., the feminist political action committee Emily’s List endorsed Rosen, though one of her prospective primary opponents is also a woman—veteran Democratic leader Dina Titus. The message from some sectors of the Democratic Party was pretty clear—if anyone crossed Rosen, he or she would have to cross a lot of party structure, too Was that an anointment? In any situation where a small number of people tell a large number of people who they get to choose from, that can be an anointment. But political scientist Fred Lokken says what has happened with Rosen is not what has come to be known as an anointment. “That is the party boss saying, This is the person,” Lokken said, though he said it can also be a
number of party bosses saying it. But he argues that thinning the field is something political parties are supposed to do. He called the Republican race for president in 2016 “insane” because of the sheer number of candidates and said party leaders should have given GOP voters some guidance on who the real candidates were. Failing to do so permitted Donald Trump to hijack the party. “In the absence of functioning parties, how does the public know who’s credible?” he asked. And some of his comments raise serious questions about what the system has evolved into. “Both Republicans and Democrats do this, but it’s something that parties are supposed to do. … The excessive cost of campaigns has now made primaries deadly. A primary challenge can bankrupt a candidate going into the general election. … Primary challenges do not invigorate the party. They divide it.” What does it say about the system that the effect of primaries must be neutralized? If Lokken is right about all this, it suggests that political parties are now wagging the political system instead of the other way around. But anointments are a doubleedged sword. There was a time when being part of the establishment paid off for candidates. That is less true now, and can even hurt a candidate. In 2014, when Tim Kuzanek announced his candidacy for Washoe County sheriff, he was able to list as supporters the incumbent sheriff, the mayors of Reno and Sparks, the county district attorney, and two former sheriffs. But he drew an opponent and lost. By contrast, district attorney candidate Chris Hicks lined up a similar phalanx of backers—the mayors of Reno and Sparks, sheriff of Washoe County, the incumbent and two former district attorneys, three state senators, developers and casino executives—to keep competitors away. No one ran against Hicks. One of the purposes of anointments is to scare off opponents. It worked for Hicks but not for Kuzanek—and then it became an issue against Kuzanek.
