Portfolio: Renan Prandini

Page 1

Portfolio Renan Prandini Politecnico di Milano 2017-2019

Politécnica da Univ. São Paulo 2014-2020

Structural Engineering Building Engineering Architecture


ACOMPLISHMENTS

RENAN PRANDINI TAN Structural Engineer Architect

São Paulo, Brazil +55 11 95430 7174 renan.pran@gmail.com

Birthday Nationality

11th March, 1996 Brazilian/Italian

tasks and flexible in group activities. Has international experience in the design of timber structures, sustainability concepts, complex BIM projects and has been a researcher of tensile structures.“

EXPERIENCE

São Paulo, Brazil

May/2019 – Feb/2020 Oslo, Norway

May/2017 – Sep/2017 São Paulo, Brazil

Mar/2016 – May/2017 São Paulo, Brazil

Oct/2015 – Oct/2016 São Paulo, Brazil

Milan, Italy

São Paulo, Brazil

Feb/2011 – Dec/2013 São Paulo, Brazil

TAN, R. P.; YAMASHITA, S.; KOPYTINA, O. . Re-stadium. Rethinking sports facilities for adaptive reuse. Master thesis in Architectural Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 2019 Presentations

Honors and Awards

Courses

Facade engineer / Architect

24th Undergraduate Research International Symposium of USP (SIICUSP) of “Aplicação do software IxCube 4.10 para modelagem paramétrica de Estruturas de Membrana”. Comprehensive Design Workshop 2019, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan Finalist at “Residential Stadium: Adaptive Reuse” Architectural Design Competition (2018) Excellent Project “SI Biossistec Jr.” and “Last Piece” awarded by Poli Júnior Lions Club Val San Martino Award for the best master thesis in Innovation and Sustainability (2019) AutoCAD 2D, Advanced MS Excel and VBA “Formal Presentations in English” Course (2017/2018) at Politecnico di Milano “Global Intensive: Energy Systems in the Built Environment” Workshop at Politecnico di Milano

Software

Studio Arthur Casas (arthurcasas.com) • Sustainability analysis, structural concepts and facade detailing

Word

Structural engineering Intern

PowerPoint

Bollinger + Grohmann Ingeniører (bollinger-grohmann.com) • Structural design and detail of timber, concrete and steel structures • Consultant and analysis of sustainability concepts • BIM Projects Level 2 and 3

Excel Project VBA

Intern Urbit (urbit.com.br) • GIS, Big data scraping and analysis • Map/User interface algorithms in Javascript • Back-end and front-end programming

Autocad

TI analyst & Sales assistant

Dynamo

Poli Júnior (polijunior.com.br) • Develop IT systems for online management of data • Web data gathering (Scraping)

Rhinoceros

Civil 3D Revit Architecture Infraworks Sketch Up

Illustrator

Researcher on Tensile Structures

Photoshop InDesign V-Ray

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) • Study form finding methods and technology used in lightweight structures • Design, model and prototype a Tensile Structure in real scale

Software

Self Assessment

••••• ••••• ••••• •••◦◦ •••◦◦

Python

••••• •••◦◦ ••••• ••◦◦◦ •••◦◦ •••◦◦ ••••◦

PHP

••••• ••••◦ ••••◦ ••◦◦◦

Dlubal RFEM

Self Assessment

••••◦ •••◦◦ ••••• ••••• •••◦◦ ••◦◦◦ •◦◦◦◦ •••••

C/C++/C# JavaScript CSS, HTML VBA SQL Grasshopper SAP2000 Karamba3D ixCube 4.10 Tensile Structures Robot Structural Analysis Seismostruct

QGIS, ArcMap TRNSYS Energy Simulation Sefaira Energy Simulation

••••◦ •••◦◦ ••••• •••◦◦ ••••◦ ••••◦ ••••◦ ••••◦ •••••

LANGUAGES

Master’s degree in Architectural Engineering (Double Degree) Politecnico di Milano GPA: 106/110

Feb/2014 – Dec/2020

TAN, R. P. ; PAULETTI, R. M. O. . A comparison of alternative form finding methods in ixCube 4.10 program. In: IASS 2016 Tokyo Symposium: Spatial Structures in the 21st Century, 2016, Tokyo.

SKILLS

EDUCATION Sep/2017 – Out/2019

Publications

behance.net/renanprandini

“Enthusiast for sustainability, complex structures and optimization. Resilient in complex

Jul/2020 – Present

TAN, R. P. ; Pauletti, R. M. O.. IxCube 4.10 application for parametric modeling of membrane structures. Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo. Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), 2015.

Mother tongue Other languages

Certifications

Portuguese COMPREHENSION

TOEFL IBT – Score 100 CELI 3 – nivello B2 – Grado C SPEAKING

WRITING

LISTENING

READING

INTERACTION

PRODUCTION

English

C2

C2

C1

C1

C1

Italian

C1

C1

C1

C1

C1

High School

Spanish

B2

B2

B2

B2

B2

Colégio Bandeirantes

German

A1

A1

A1

A1

A1

Master’s degree in Civil Engineering Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo


ACOMPLISHMENTS

RENAN PRANDINI TAN Structural Engineer Architect

São Paulo, Brazil +55 11 95430 7174 renan.pran@gmail.com

Birthday Nationality

11th March, 1996 Brazilian/Italian

tasks and flexible in group activities. Has international experience in the design of timber structures, sustainability concepts, complex BIM projects and has been a researcher of tensile structures.“

EXPERIENCE

São Paulo, Brazil

May/2019 – Feb/2020 Oslo, Norway

May/2017 – Sep/2017 São Paulo, Brazil

Mar/2016 – May/2017 São Paulo, Brazil

Oct/2015 – Oct/2016 São Paulo, Brazil

Milan, Italy

São Paulo, Brazil

Feb/2011 – Dec/2013 São Paulo, Brazil

TAN, R. P.; YAMASHITA, S.; KOPYTINA, O. . Re-stadium. Rethinking sports facilities for adaptive reuse. Master thesis in Architectural Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 2019 Presentations

Honors and Awards

Courses

Facade engineer / Architect

24th Undergraduate Research International Symposium of USP (SIICUSP) of “Aplicação do software IxCube 4.10 para modelagem paramétrica de Estruturas de Membrana”. Comprehensive Design Workshop 2019, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan Finalist at “Residential Stadium: Adaptive Reuse” Architectural Design Competition (2018) Excellent Project “SI Biossistec Jr.” and “Last Piece” awarded by Poli Júnior Lions Club Val San Martino Award for the best master thesis in Innovation and Sustainability (2019) AutoCAD 2D, Advanced MS Excel and VBA “Formal Presentations in English” Course (2017/2018) at Politecnico di Milano “Global Intensive: Energy Systems in the Built Environment” Workshop at Politecnico di Milano

Software

Studio Arthur Casas (arthurcasas.com) • Sustainability analysis, structural concepts and facade detailing

Word

Structural engineering Intern

PowerPoint

Bollinger + Grohmann Ingeniører (bollinger-grohmann.com) • Structural design and detail of timber, concrete and steel structures • Consultant and analysis of sustainability concepts • BIM Projects Level 2 and 3

Excel Project VBA

Intern Urbit (urbit.com.br) • GIS, Big data scraping and analysis • Map/User interface algorithms in Javascript • Back-end and front-end programming

Autocad

TI analyst & Sales assistant

Dynamo

Poli Júnior (polijunior.com.br) • Develop IT systems for online management of data • Web data gathering (Scraping)

Rhinoceros

Civil 3D Revit Architecture Infraworks Sketch Up

Illustrator

Researcher on Tensile Structures

Photoshop InDesign V-Ray

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) • Study form finding methods and technology used in lightweight structures • Design, model and prototype a Tensile Structure in real scale

Software

Self Assessment

••••• ••••• ••••• •••◦◦ •••◦◦

Python

••••• •••◦◦ ••••• ••◦◦◦ •••◦◦ •••◦◦ ••••◦

PHP

••••• ••••◦ ••••◦ ••◦◦◦

Dlubal RFEM

Self Assessment

••••◦ •••◦◦ ••••• ••••• •••◦◦ ••◦◦◦ •◦◦◦◦ •••••

C/C++/C# JavaScript CSS, HTML VBA SQL Grasshopper SAP2000 Karamba3D ixCube 4.10 Tensile Structures Robot Structural Analysis Seismostruct

QGIS, ArcMap TRNSYS Energy Simulation Sefaira Energy Simulation

••••◦ •••◦◦ ••••• •••◦◦ ••••◦ ••••◦ ••••◦ ••••◦ •••••

LANGUAGES

Master’s degree in Architectural Engineering (Double Degree) Politecnico di Milano GPA: 106/110

Feb/2014 – Dec/2020

TAN, R. P. ; PAULETTI, R. M. O. . A comparison of alternative form finding methods in ixCube 4.10 program. In: IASS 2016 Tokyo Symposium: Spatial Structures in the 21st Century, 2016, Tokyo.

SKILLS

EDUCATION Sep/2017 – Out/2019

Publications

behance.net/renanprandini

“Enthusiast for sustainability, complex structures and optimization. Resilient in complex

Jul/2020 – Present

TAN, R. P. ; Pauletti, R. M. O.. IxCube 4.10 application for parametric modeling of membrane structures. Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo. Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), 2015.

Mother tongue Other languages

Certifications

Portuguese COMPREHENSION

TOEFL IBT – Score 100 CELI 3 – nivello B2 – Grado C SPEAKING

WRITING

LISTENING

READING

INTERACTION

PRODUCTION

English

C2

C2

C1

C1

C1

Italian

C1

C1

C1

C1

C1

High School

Spanish

B2

B2

B2

B2

B2

Colégio Bandeirantes

German

A1

A1

A1

A1

A1

Master’s degree in Civil Engineering Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo


Contents Part 1: Structural engineering

“Para hacer las cosas bien es necesario: primero, el amor, segundo, la técnica.” Antonio Gaudí

Research on tensile structures

01

IASS 2016 Tokyo Publication

03

CFD Simulations / Structural engineering consultancy

04

Building form finding within grasshopper

Contemporary scandinavian cabins

05 07

Seismic intervention at villa Orlando

09

Nordic Light

10

Finite element programming

11

Insekttårn

13

15

Svartisen Glacier Resort

RECOMMENDATIONS Feel free to contact me if you'd like some references. I'll be happy to supply at least six relevant academics/professionals who can backup my way of working!

Part 2: Architecture Urban Analysis in Porto di Mare, Milano

17

Urban Design in Lecco

19

Restoration of ex-azienda Baruffaldi

21

Caretta Caretta Pavillion

23

Reciprocity

25

Part 3: Sustainability Sustainable building technologies

29

33

Master’s thesis: Re-Stadium


Contents Part 1: Structural engineering

“Para hacer las cosas bien es necesario: primero, el amor, segundo, la técnica.” Antonio Gaudí

Research on tensile structures

01

IASS 2016 Tokyo Publication

03

CFD Simulations / Structural engineering consultancy

04

Building form finding within grasshopper

Contemporary scandinavian cabins

05 07

Seismic intervention at villa Orlando

09

Nordic Light

10

Finite element programming

11

Insekttårn

13

15

Svartisen Glacier Resort

RECOMMENDATIONS Feel free to contact me if you'd like some references. I'll be happy to supply at least six relevant academics/professionals who can backup my way of working!

Part 2: Architecture Urban Analysis in Porto di Mare, Milano

17

Urban Design in Lecco

19

Restoration of ex-azienda Baruffaldi

21

Caretta Caretta Pavillion

23

Reciprocity

25

Part 3: Sustainability Sustainable building technologies

29

33

Master’s thesis: Re-Stadium


Renan Prandini

Design, analysis and protyping a tensile structure Undergraduated research sposored by FAPESP

Patterning Detailling

PART 1: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

The work was rated “beyond expectations” for the most renowned research institution in Brazil, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP).

Loads and Actions

The research consisted in learning a commercially available software ixCube 4.10 for building tensile structures, study of lightweight structural systems and theory. Deep knowledge on these structural systems is not offered in the undergraduate level, leaving only voluntary research for its development.

Design & Form finding

Guiding prof. Ruy M.O. Pauletti

Although not required by the programme, a prototype of the structure has been made in real scale. Due to budget restrictions and weight of the structure, plastic materials were chosen, which allowed for easy transportation and fast construction, inspired by tent designs. The structure was able to take high wind loads and high rain intensity. 1

2


Renan Prandini

Design, analysis and protyping a tensile structure Undergraduated research sposored by FAPESP

Patterning Detailling

PART 1: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

The work was rated “beyond expectations” for the most renowned research institution in Brazil, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP).

Loads and Actions

The research consisted in learning a commercially available software ixCube 4.10 for building tensile structures, study of lightweight structural systems and theory. Deep knowledge on these structural systems is not offered in the undergraduate level, leaving only voluntary research for its development.

Design & Form finding

Guiding prof. Ruy M.O. Pauletti

Although not required by the programme, a prototype of the structure has been made in real scale. Due to budget restrictions and weight of the structure, plastic materials were chosen, which allowed for easy transportation and fast construction, inspired by tent designs. The structure was able to take high wind loads and high rain intensity. 1

2


Renan Prandini

A comparison of form-finding methods

Structural system design & analysis

Published at International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS) 2016, Tokyo with prof. Ruy M.O. Pauletti

Structural consultancy in over 30 projects spread over Europe with world-class architectural studios and in various stages of projects, from conception to detailing.

PROCESSING T IME URS

22.055

NFDM

6

7

5

8

4

6

7

MODEL

MAXIMUM CABL E F ORCE

2

3

4

URS

7

6.328

26-Sep-19

Isometric

Bollinger+Grohmann International GmbH

Page:

1

Sheet:

Westhafenplatz 1, 60327 FRANKFURT AM MAIN

1

RESULTS

Tel: 069/240007-34 - Fax: 069/240007-30

Model: Wireframe Model v05

Date:

26-Sep-19

GLOBAL DEFORMATIONS u

Isometric

LC 1 Global Deformations u

FDM

9

NFDM

URS Bollinger+Grohmann International GmbH Westhafenplatz 1, 60327 FRANKFURT AM MAIN Tel: 069/240007-34 - Fax: 069/240007-30

Project: 19070

GLOBAL DEFORMATIONS u LC 1 Global Deformations u

Model: Wireframe Model v05

Page:

1

Sheet:

1

RESULTS Date:

26-Sep-19

Isometric

Members Max M-y: 713.85, Min M-y: -550.57 [kNm]

Max u: 17.6, Min u: 0.0 [mm] Factor of deformations: 200.00

9

Max u: 4.8, Min u: 0.0 [mm] Factor of deformations: 100.00

32,743

6

1

RESULTS Date:

LC 1 Members Internal Forces M-y

Project: 19070

20,011 20,007

22,258 22,484 21,569

32,648 32,408 5

15,864

20,017 20,017

23,211 20,029 20,030

MAXIMUM CABLE FORCE (KN)

1

NFDM

37,134

38,417 35,699 36,100

FDM

1

Sheet:

INTERNAL FORCES My

1st Principal Stresses 8

Model: Wireframe Model v05

1.001 1.001

1.001 1.000

1.001 1.002

1.564 5

Page:

Tel: 069/240007-34 - Fax: 069/240007-30

Cables

3

1.002 1.002

1.593

1.625

2.297 2.137 2.085 2

1.001 1.002

1.308 1.321 1.321

1.209 1.019 1.002

Avg. Warp (kN/m)

1

Westhafenplatz 1, 60327 FRANKFURT AM MAIN

2nd Principal Stresses

URS

3.396

NFDM

Bollinger+Grohmann International GmbH

Project: 19070

Model #5

MODEL

AVERAGE 1ST PRINCIPAL STRESS FDM

9 typical membrane structures used in benchmarks were calculated using different form finding methods. Results were compared between geometry, processing time and resulting stresses. The paper also discusses how some form-found geometries may mislead to non-efficient designs.

0.047 0.714

4.031

5.055

4

0.320 0.578 1.001

3

0.281 0.532 1.021

2

0.203 1.649

0.031 0.729 3.430

1

0.297 2.430

0.203 0.438 1.282

PROCESSING TIME (S)

21.133

FDM

8

9

Available at: https://bit.ly/2X2sxHX

MODEL

Isometric

PART 1: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

CO 5: SLS - QP - LL leading Global Deformations u

CFD Simulations U W V

36.8 mm

Global Deformations |u| [mm] 36.8 33.5 30.1 26.8 23.4 20.1 16.7 13.4 10.0 6.7 3.3

Max u: 36.8, Min u: 0.0 [mm] Factor of deformations: 39.00

3

Max : Min :

0.0 36.8 0.0

4


Renan Prandini

A comparison of form-finding methods

Structural system design & analysis

Published at International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS) 2016, Tokyo with prof. Ruy M.O. Pauletti

Structural consultancy in over 30 projects spread over Europe with world-class architectural studios and in various stages of projects, from conception to detailing.

PROCESSING T IME URS

22.055

NFDM

6

7

5

8

4

6

7

MODEL

MAXIMUM CABL E F ORCE

2

3

4

URS

7

6.328

26-Sep-19

Isometric

Bollinger+Grohmann International GmbH

Page:

1

Sheet:

Westhafenplatz 1, 60327 FRANKFURT AM MAIN

1

RESULTS

Tel: 069/240007-34 - Fax: 069/240007-30

Model: Wireframe Model v05

Date:

26-Sep-19

GLOBAL DEFORMATIONS u

Isometric

LC 1 Global Deformations u

FDM

9

NFDM

URS Bollinger+Grohmann International GmbH Westhafenplatz 1, 60327 FRANKFURT AM MAIN Tel: 069/240007-34 - Fax: 069/240007-30

Project: 19070

GLOBAL DEFORMATIONS u LC 1 Global Deformations u

Model: Wireframe Model v05

Page:

1

Sheet:

1

RESULTS Date:

26-Sep-19

Isometric

Members Max M-y: 713.85, Min M-y: -550.57 [kNm]

Max u: 17.6, Min u: 0.0 [mm] Factor of deformations: 200.00

9

Max u: 4.8, Min u: 0.0 [mm] Factor of deformations: 100.00

32,743

6

1

RESULTS Date:

LC 1 Members Internal Forces M-y

Project: 19070

20,011 20,007

22,258 22,484 21,569

32,648 32,408 5

15,864

20,017 20,017

23,211 20,029 20,030

MAXIMUM CABLE FORCE (KN)

1

NFDM

37,134

38,417 35,699 36,100

FDM

1

Sheet:

INTERNAL FORCES My

1st Principal Stresses 8

Model: Wireframe Model v05

1.001 1.001

1.001 1.000

1.001 1.002

1.564 5

Page:

Tel: 069/240007-34 - Fax: 069/240007-30

Cables

3

1.002 1.002

1.593

1.625

2.297 2.137 2.085 2

1.001 1.002

1.308 1.321 1.321

1.209 1.019 1.002

Avg. Warp (kN/m)

1

Westhafenplatz 1, 60327 FRANKFURT AM MAIN

2nd Principal Stresses

URS

3.396

NFDM

Bollinger+Grohmann International GmbH

Project: 19070

Model #5

MODEL

AVERAGE 1ST PRINCIPAL STRESS FDM

9 typical membrane structures used in benchmarks were calculated using different form finding methods. Results were compared between geometry, processing time and resulting stresses. The paper also discusses how some form-found geometries may mislead to non-efficient designs.

0.047 0.714

4.031

5.055

4

0.320 0.578 1.001

3

0.281 0.532 1.021

2

0.203 1.649

0.031 0.729 3.430

1

0.297 2.430

0.203 0.438 1.282

PROCESSING TIME (S)

21.133

FDM

8

9

Available at: https://bit.ly/2X2sxHX

MODEL

Isometric

PART 1: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

CO 5: SLS - QP - LL leading Global Deformations u

CFD Simulations U W V

36.8 mm

Global Deformations |u| [mm] 36.8 33.5 30.1 26.8 23.4 20.1 16.7 13.4 10.0 6.7 3.3

Max u: 36.8, Min u: 0.0 [mm] Factor of deformations: 39.00

3

Max : Min :

0.0 36.8 0.0

4


Renan Prandini

Parametric design applied to membrane structures

Custom components

Development of grasshopper applications for form-find design using finite elements Implementation of the Natural Force Density Method for the shape finding of membrane structures. The method focus on finding the position for each one of the nodes in a mesh that result in a stable structural system according to prescribed stresses and imposed boundary conditions. For each triangular element a transformation of the prescribed stress is required to find the forces between the nodes:

Multiple solutions

Force densities are then assigned in a global matrix and iterative calculation is performed to find the position of the nodes in equilibrium.

Mesh element definition y

2

PART 1: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

x^

2

2

x^

2

2

3

2

1

3

2

2

2

5

1

2

2

2

2

2

^

1

3

2

6


Renan Prandini

Parametric design applied to membrane structures

Custom components

Development of grasshopper applications for form-find design using finite elements Implementation of the Natural Force Density Method for the shape finding of membrane structures. The method focus on finding the position for each one of the nodes in a mesh that result in a stable structural system according to prescribed stresses and imposed boundary conditions. For each triangular element a transformation of the prescribed stress is required to find the forces between the nodes:

Multiple solutions

Force densities are then assigned in a global matrix and iterative calculation is performed to find the position of the nodes in equilibrium.

Mesh element definition y

2

PART 1: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

x^

2

2

x^

2

2

3

2

1

3

2

2

2

5

1

2

2

2

2

2

^

1

3

2

6


Renan Prandini

Minimalist scandinavian cabins Structural design, detailing and optimization of cabins with Lundhagem arkitekter at Bollinger+Grohmann Ingenieure

-1.53

PART 1: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

-0.18 0.28 -3.03

0.03 -2.32 1.36 4.98 1.21

3.57 2.47 16.57

7

6.41

-0.04

-0.87 -0.01 6.01 0.29 0.11

-1.51

1.24

0.87

0.57

8.27 1.21 1.20

5.45

2.32 3.64

1.41

-0.01 -0.25

2.56 0.21 -4.39

2.65 1.10 3.97 -0.01 0.87

-0.01 0.04

-1.07 0.96 0.01 1.45

-4.28 3.81 0.78 -0.15 5.23 12.25 6.44

2.25

2.04 3.10 8.04 2.39 4.24 -2.92 1.18 1.25 3.79 5.04 0.06

4.07 1.99

8


Renan Prandini

Minimalist scandinavian cabins Structural design, detailing and optimization of cabins with Lundhagem arkitekter at Bollinger+Grohmann Ingenieure

-1.53

PART 1: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

-0.18 0.28 -3.03

0.03 -2.32 1.36 4.98 1.21

3.57 2.47 16.57

7

6.41

-0.04

-0.87 -0.01 6.01 0.29 0.11

-1.51

1.24

0.87

0.57

8.27 1.21 1.20

5.45

2.32 3.64

1.41

-0.01 -0.25

2.56 0.21 -4.39

2.65 1.10 3.97 -0.01 0.87

-0.01 0.04

-1.07 0.96 0.01 1.45

-4.28 3.81 0.78 -0.15 5.23 12.25 6.44

2.25

2.04 3.10 8.04 2.39 4.24 -2.92 1.18 1.25 3.79 5.04 0.06

4.07 1.99

8


Renan Prandini

Fjordporten - Nordic Light

Seismic intervention at Villa Orlando Consolidamento em Politecnico di Milano

Skyscraper at Oslo city center, Norway Bollinger-Grohmann / C.F. Møller

+11,50

+11,50

+ 9,50

+ 9,50

210

Structural reinforcement of an italian villa in Bellagio, Italy. From insitu mesurements to structural analysis and detailing, this historical masonry building from the end of the 19th century has been restored to structural safety for more years. Structural analysis was made according to the eurocode and italian standards for seismic loads.

50

+ 7,40

50

Design spectra was used as well as SAP 2000 for finding loads and hand calculation was employed for verifying results.

60

+ 4,10

60

200

378

378

The safety of the structure was compromised for some of the wooden beams, which led to the design of a timber-concrete composite solution, in order to maintain the historical structure, as well as a cost estimation.

32

32

+ 4,10

300

300

30

30

+ 7,40

210

with Marco Maranesi

+ 0,00

80

+ 0,00

85

SEZIONE A - A

Ingegneria edile-architettura - a.a. 2017/18

PART 1: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

Docente: Ing. Lorenzo Jurina

PROSPETTO OVEST

CONSOLIDAMENTO DI STRUTTURE

Maranesi Marco

Consolidamento ex - lavanderia sita in Bellagio, via beneficenza 36

Prandini Renan

Sezioni trasversali

SCALA 1:100

04

20°

Detailing of Wood-CLS joining 9

10


Renan Prandini

Fjordporten - Nordic Light

Seismic intervention at Villa Orlando Consolidamento em Politecnico di Milano

Skyscraper at Oslo city center, Norway Bollinger-Grohmann / C.F. Møller

+11,50

+11,50

+ 9,50

+ 9,50

210

Structural reinforcement of an italian villa in Bellagio, Italy. From insitu mesurements to structural analysis and detailing, this historical masonry building from the end of the 19th century has been restored to structural safety for more years. Structural analysis was made according to the eurocode and italian standards for seismic loads.

50

+ 7,40

50

Design spectra was used as well as SAP 2000 for finding loads and hand calculation was employed for verifying results.

60

+ 4,10

60

200

378

378

The safety of the structure was compromised for some of the wooden beams, which led to the design of a timber-concrete composite solution, in order to maintain the historical structure, as well as a cost estimation.

32

32

+ 4,10

300

300

30

30

+ 7,40

210

with Marco Maranesi

+ 0,00

80

+ 0,00

85

SEZIONE A - A

Ingegneria edile-architettura - a.a. 2017/18

PART 1: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

Docente: Ing. Lorenzo Jurina

PROSPETTO OVEST

CONSOLIDAMENTO DI STRUTTURE

Maranesi Marco

Consolidamento ex - lavanderia sita in Bellagio, via beneficenza 36

Prandini Renan

Sezioni trasversali

SCALA 1:100

04

20°

Detailing of Wood-CLS joining 9

10


Renan Prandini

Parametric design applied to finite elements Computational mechanics applied to complex engineering problems

Implementation Rhino 6

Objective: Find deformations and stresses for a composite section under bending and axial force. i.e. reinforced concrete pillars

+ Grasshopper

Non-linear materials

+

Parabolic stress-strain relationship for the concrete and steel reinforcement over perfect elastoplastic model

Python Scripting

Teoria: Euler-Bernoulli hipothesis: Linear deformations

When R = 0 , the section is in equilibrium

Deformations

PART 1: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

Stress is a function of deformation Matrix formulation of the Newton’s Method

Algoritm Mesh = GenerateMesh( geometry , X_subdivisions, Y_subdivisions) For i in no_iterations: For element in Mesh: area = CalculateArea( element ) centroid = CalculateCentroid( element ) material = DefineMaterial( element ) deformation = Deformation_at_pt( guess , material ) sigma = Tension_at_pt( deformation , material ) D = DerivativeTension_at_pt( deformation , material )

Stresses

// Sum_product for defining matrix elements of K and R deltaX = SolveLDU(matrix_K , matrix_R) For n in range(0,3): guess[n] = guess[n] + deltaX[n] return guess

11

12


Renan Prandini

Parametric design applied to finite elements Computational mechanics applied to complex engineering problems

Implementation Rhino 6

Objective: Find deformations and stresses for a composite section under bending and axial force. i.e. reinforced concrete pillars

+ Grasshopper

Non-linear materials

+

Parabolic stress-strain relationship for the concrete and steel reinforcement over perfect elastoplastic model

Python Scripting

Teoria: Euler-Bernoulli hipothesis: Linear deformations

When R = 0 , the section is in equilibrium

Deformations

PART 1: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

Stress is a function of deformation Matrix formulation of the Newton’s Method

Algoritm Mesh = GenerateMesh( geometry , X_subdivisions, Y_subdivisions) For i in no_iterations: For element in Mesh: area = CalculateArea( element ) centroid = CalculateCentroid( element ) material = DefineMaterial( element ) deformation = Deformation_at_pt( guess , material ) sigma = Tension_at_pt( deformation , material ) D = DerivativeTension_at_pt( deformation , material )

Stresses

// Sum_product for defining matrix elements of K and R deltaX = SolveLDU(matrix_K , matrix_R) For n in range(0,3): guess[n] = guess[n] + deltaX[n] return guess

11

12


D ET A I L B - S E C T I O N 1 - 1

Renan Prandini

Scale 1:10

Insekttårn

D ET A I L 0 4 - S E C T I O N 1 - 1

D ET A I L 0 4 - S E C T I O N 2 - 2

Scale 1:10

Scale 1:10

Structural design and detailing of an achitectural experiment

Full structural design of a 17-meter timber tower.

Bollinger+Grohmann

Project developed from conception from 3D modelling, structural analysis, timber 73members and joints verification ISO METR I C V IEW

0 12

Bended Steel Plate 400x125x3 [mm]

80 65

173 EQ EQ

EQ

198

86

TYPE A

Steel Plate 350x120x3

240a3,t 75 50

TYPE a3,tA

EQ

Steel Plate 350x120x3

350

TYPE A

86

60

65 60 60 50 75

98

138

M16 Bolt M16 Nut 2x Large M16 Washer

35

460

173

60

M16 Bolt +Large Washer 98 +Nut

50 M16 Bolt +Large Washer +Nut

198

22

,t a3

I SO M ET R I C

198

198

M16 Bolt +Large Washer +Nut

D ET A I L 0 2.04°

87 87

Bolts must be a

a3 ,t

TYPE A TYPE I

TYPE A2

73

73

98

TYPE D 198

17 3

198

198

Project

98

240 TYPE A2

Plan

98

TYPE D

198

D ET A I L 0 4 - P L A N V I EW

C o nne c t io n De s c r ip t io n

PART 1: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

198 TYPE D TYPE H

TYPE G

D ET A I L 0 1 - S E C T I O N 1 - 1

D ET A I L 0 1 - S E C T I O N 2 - 2

Scale 1:10

Scale 1:10

73

TYPE D

TYPE D

73

TYPE H

TYPE L

TYPE H TYPE C

198

Detail #A03

TYPE F

TYPE C TYPE E TYPE E TYPE C

84

89

M16 Bolt + M16 Nut + 2x Large M16 Washer + 2x Bulldog Trapping

M16 Bolt, 2x large washer, M16 Nut (steel plate connection)

B

Steel base plate 260x260x15, M20 Anchor bolt HSF-A/120

16

C

M24 Bolt, 2x Large washer, 4x Bulldog 73/130 type C4, M24 Nut

16

D

M20 Bolt, 2x Large washer, 2x Bulldog 117 type C2, M24 Nut

16

E

M24 Bolt, 2x Large Washer, 2x Bulldog 117 type C2

16

F

12x M6-80 Screws, steel plate 420x120x3 [mm]

24

G

6x M6-80 Screws, steel plate 400x125x3 [mm]

16

H

M24 Bolt, 2x Large Washer, 2x Bulldog 117 type C2

16

I

4x M6-60 Screws, steel plate 350x120x3 [mm]

8

J

9x M6-60 Screws, steel plate 215x90x3 [mm]

16

K

M16 Bolt, 2x large washer, M16 Nut

L

9x M6-60 Screws, bended steel plate at 2.04° 400x125x3

2

D ET A I L 0 3 - P L A N V I EW Scale 1:10

4

Steel grade 275 class A2

Project

Insekttårn

TYPE G

198

198

90

50 50 50 50

Scale 1:50

TYPE C TYPE E TYPE E

TYPE J

215

T O P V I EW

M16 Nut + Large M16 Washer + Bulldog Trapping

A2

Q ua nt i t y 1 12

198

Detail #A01

98 198

75 50 5025

13

215

98

A

D e s c ri p t i o n 1 M16 Bolt, 2x large washer, M16 Nut

Detail #A02

EQ

198

EQ

150

M16 Bolt + M16 Nut + 2x Large M16 Washer + 2x Bulldog Trapping

Type

240

Scale 1:10

M16 Nut + Large M16 Washer + Bulldog Trapping

9x ⌀6x75 mm Screws Stainless Steel A4

TYPE B

Company Plan Date RPR OHM

Location of connections 08/21/19 Author Checker

Project Number

19044 Plannummer

Scale

-

A05

D

Date RPR OHM

198

TYPE I

Company

TYPE H

98

98

I

2

Detail #A04

14

Scale


D ET A I L B - S E C T I O N 1 - 1

Renan Prandini

Scale 1:10

Insekttårn

D ET A I L 0 4 - S E C T I O N 1 - 1

D ET A I L 0 4 - S E C T I O N 2 - 2

Scale 1:10

Scale 1:10

Structural design and detailing of an achitectural experiment

Full structural design of a 17-meter timber tower.

Bollinger+Grohmann

Project developed from conception from 3D modelling, structural analysis, timber 73members and joints verification ISO METR I C V IEW

0 12

Bended Steel Plate 400x125x3 [mm]

80 65

173 EQ EQ

EQ

198

86

TYPE A

Steel Plate 350x120x3

240a3,t 75 50

TYPE a3,tA

EQ

Steel Plate 350x120x3

350

TYPE A

86

60

65 60 60 50 75

98

138

M16 Bolt M16 Nut 2x Large M16 Washer

35

460

173

60

M16 Bolt +Large Washer 98 +Nut

50 M16 Bolt +Large Washer +Nut

198

22

,t a3

I SO M ET R I C

198

198

M16 Bolt +Large Washer +Nut

D ET A I L 0 2.04°

87 87

Bolts must be a

a3 ,t

TYPE A TYPE I

TYPE A2

73

73

98

TYPE D 198

17 3

198

198

Project

98

240 TYPE A2

Plan

98

TYPE D

198

D ET A I L 0 4 - P L A N V I EW

C o nne c t io n De s c r ip t io n

PART 1: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

198 TYPE D TYPE H

TYPE G

D ET A I L 0 1 - S E C T I O N 1 - 1

D ET A I L 0 1 - S E C T I O N 2 - 2

Scale 1:10

Scale 1:10

73

TYPE D

TYPE D

73

TYPE H

TYPE L

TYPE H TYPE C

198

Detail #A03

TYPE F

TYPE C TYPE E TYPE E TYPE C

84

89

M16 Bolt + M16 Nut + 2x Large M16 Washer + 2x Bulldog Trapping

M16 Bolt, 2x large washer, M16 Nut (steel plate connection)

B

Steel base plate 260x260x15, M20 Anchor bolt HSF-A/120

16

C

M24 Bolt, 2x Large washer, 4x Bulldog 73/130 type C4, M24 Nut

16

D

M20 Bolt, 2x Large washer, 2x Bulldog 117 type C2, M24 Nut

16

E

M24 Bolt, 2x Large Washer, 2x Bulldog 117 type C2

16

F

12x M6-80 Screws, steel plate 420x120x3 [mm]

24

G

6x M6-80 Screws, steel plate 400x125x3 [mm]

16

H

M24 Bolt, 2x Large Washer, 2x Bulldog 117 type C2

16

I

4x M6-60 Screws, steel plate 350x120x3 [mm]

8

J

9x M6-60 Screws, steel plate 215x90x3 [mm]

16

K

M16 Bolt, 2x large washer, M16 Nut

L

9x M6-60 Screws, bended steel plate at 2.04° 400x125x3

2

D ET A I L 0 3 - P L A N V I EW Scale 1:10

4

Steel grade 275 class A2

Project

Insekttårn

TYPE G

198

198

90

50 50 50 50

Scale 1:50

TYPE C TYPE E TYPE E

TYPE J

215

T O P V I EW

M16 Nut + Large M16 Washer + Bulldog Trapping

A2

Q ua nt i t y 1 12

198

Detail #A01

98 198

75 50 5025

13

215

98

A

D e s c ri p t i o n 1 M16 Bolt, 2x large washer, M16 Nut

Detail #A02

EQ

198

EQ

150

M16 Bolt + M16 Nut + 2x Large M16 Washer + 2x Bulldog Trapping

Type

240

Scale 1:10

M16 Nut + Large M16 Washer + Bulldog Trapping

9x ⌀6x75 mm Screws Stainless Steel A4

TYPE B

Company Plan Date RPR OHM

Location of connections 08/21/19 Author Checker

Project Number

19044 Plannummer

Scale

-

A05

D

Date RPR OHM

198

TYPE I

Company

TYPE H

98

98

I

2

Detail #A04

14

Scale


Renan Prandini

Powerhouse Svartisen Glacier Resort BIM Modelling Level 3 in Dynamo Bollinger+Grohmann / Snøhetta

3D BIM coordenation of the structural modelling of a timber resort using parametric tools and avoiding geometric imperfections instrinsicate to revit manual modelling of doubly curved roofs, simplifying it to linear elements.

Level 3 Service 11.000

PART 1: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

G 21 L 3 5x 0L 36 0

Level 3 Mezanin 12.150

Level 3 9.500

280x990 not final dimension

x4 00 x2 0R

H S

Level 2 6.500

Level 1 3.000

Sea level

g

Fondation -3.000

15

16


Renan Prandini

Powerhouse Svartisen Glacier Resort BIM Modelling Level 3 in Dynamo Bollinger+Grohmann / Snøhetta

3D BIM coordenation of the structural modelling of a timber resort using parametric tools and avoiding geometric imperfections instrinsicate to revit manual modelling of doubly curved roofs, simplifying it to linear elements.

Level 3 Service 11.000

PART 1: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

G 21 L 3 5x 0L 36 0

Level 3 Mezanin 12.150

Level 3 9.500

280x990 not final dimension

x4 00 x2 0R

H S

Level 2 6.500

Level 1 3.000

Sea level

g

Fondation -3.000

15

16


Renan Prandini

Urban analysis | Porto di Mare, Milano

PART 2: ARCHITECTURE

with Marco Maranesi, Marina Ryzhkova and Parisa Peymani

Research on the quality of urban spaces through the Integrated Modification Methodology.

17

18


Renan Prandini

Urban analysis | Porto di Mare, Milano

PART 2: ARCHITECTURE

with Marco Maranesi, Marina Ryzhkova and Parisa Peymani

Research on the quality of urban spaces through the Integrated Modification Methodology.

17

18


Renan Prandini with Ariana Trombini, Andrea Manev, Leonardo Biondi, Mohammed Ahsani, Io Hendrick and Valerie Declerc

PART 2: ARCHITECTURE

Urban Design | Breathable Neighbourhood

19

20


Renan Prandini with Ariana Trombini, Andrea Manev, Leonardo Biondi, Mohammed Ahsani, Io Hendrick and Valerie Declerc

PART 2: ARCHITECTURE

Urban Design | Breathable Neighbourhood

19

20


Renan Prandini

Restauration of ex-Ditta Baruffaldi com Stefano Dell’Oro, Roberta Vizzaro e Marco Battistini

Deterioration Material Geometric

Intervento

Análise higrométrica

PART 2: ARCHITECTURE

Análise termográfica

In-situ surveys, intervention design and energy performance

21

22


Renan Prandini

Restauration of ex-Ditta Baruffaldi com Stefano Dell’Oro, Roberta Vizzaro e Marco Battistini

Deterioration Material Geometric

Intervento

Análise higrométrica

PART 2: ARCHITECTURE

Análise termográfica

In-situ surveys, intervention design and energy performance

21

22


Renan Prandini

Caretta Caretta Pavilion Landscape parametric desgin

Open-air pavilion design with parametric tools

with Shohei Yamashita

50x3 Nail solid wood r = 75 mm; h = 170 mm

30 mm recycled pallet plywood board 80 cm x 80 cm

Alternating 40cm x 40 cm

grid positioning

between boards

OSB Joint Tongue and Groove + 1.8 m +0m

PART 2: ARCHITECTURE

Parametric structural design analysis in Karamba

23

24


Renan Prandini

Caretta Caretta Pavilion Landscape parametric desgin

Open-air pavilion design with parametric tools

with Shohei Yamashita

50x3 Nail solid wood r = 75 mm; h = 170 mm

30 mm recycled pallet plywood board 80 cm x 80 cm

Alternating 40cm x 40 cm

grid positioning

between boards

OSB Joint Tongue and Groove + 1.8 m +0m

PART 2: ARCHITECTURE

Parametric structural design analysis in Karamba

23

24


Renan Prandini

ReciproCity Politecnico di Milano, 2018 Student Housing and residential complex at a industrial area in Milan Architecture and Sustainable Technology Studio with Shohei Yamashita, Ozlem Bozkaya, Paolo Tagni and Laura Galvani

Reciprocity is an exchange that results in a multual benefit. Knowledge, friendship and spontaneity are the means of trading in this project. From outside the neighbourhood is capable of interacting with its habitants through large openings in the common areas, while the surroundings become a transient landscape from inside, specially since the green areas offer generous spaces for free use. The interaction between residents is enhanced by a non-conventional circulation which boosts occasional encounters and promotes the coliving experience. A highly sustainable project is achieved through the highuse of mass timber elements and low CO2 emission materials, high-performance envelope and increased natural lighting designs based on simulations.

25

26


Renan Prandini

ReciproCity Politecnico di Milano, 2018 Student Housing and residential complex at a industrial area in Milan Architecture and Sustainable Technology Studio with Shohei Yamashita, Ozlem Bozkaya, Paolo Tagni and Laura Galvani

Reciprocity is an exchange that results in a multual benefit. Knowledge, friendship and spontaneity are the means of trading in this project. From outside the neighbourhood is capable of interacting with its habitants through large openings in the common areas, while the surroundings become a transient landscape from inside, specially since the green areas offer generous spaces for free use. The interaction between residents is enhanced by a non-conventional circulation which boosts occasional encounters and promotes the coliving experience. A highly sustainable project is achieved through the highuse of mass timber elements and low CO2 emission materials, high-performance envelope and increased natural lighting designs based on simulations.

25

26


3F

PART 2: ARCHITECTURE 2F

1F

0F

Renan Prandini

27 28


3F

PART 2: ARCHITECTURE 2F

1F

0F

Renan Prandini

27 28


Renan Prandini

Energy simulations and optimization 180

0%

-3,89%

160

-8,77%

Structural detailing

-11,82%

S.J.06

140

Glulam column, dim. 30x30 cm

100

-57.21%

80

-62.02%

60 40 20

General Massing

Height Changes High Performing Window Envelope Optimization

Pumps (kWh/m2/yr) Interior (kWh/m2/yr)

Functional Radiant Floor Modification

Heat pump

Nat Ventilation

Fans (kWh/m2/yr)

Heating (kWh/m2/yr)

Cooling (kWh/m2/yr)

Reduction

Technological detailing

REALIZZATO CON UN PRODOTTO AUTODESK VERSIONE PER STUDENTI

High-performance resilient soundproofing profile th. 6 mm

-30,82%

120

0

Custom facade design

5 kN

-60.89%

Zinc plated carbon steel double "T" profile

Zinc plated carbon steel screw for timber

-76.58%

add skin as shading

10 kN

Hidden alluminium alloy bracket with holes

lighting

-85.65%

Glulam beam , dim. 12 x 28 cm

6 kNm

PV panels

PV Production (kWh/m2/yr)

Threaded bolt with screw nut Glulam column, dim. 30x30 cm

PART 3: SUSTAINABILITY

REALIZZATO CON UN PRODOTTO AUTODESK VERSIONE PER STUDENTI

29

30


Renan Prandini

Energy simulations and optimization 180

0%

-3,89%

160

-8,77%

Structural detailing

-11,82%

S.J.06

140

Glulam column, dim. 30x30 cm

100

-57.21%

80

-62.02%

60 40 20

General Massing

Height Changes High Performing Window Envelope Optimization

Pumps (kWh/m2/yr) Interior (kWh/m2/yr)

Functional Radiant Floor Modification

Heat pump

Nat Ventilation

Fans (kWh/m2/yr)

Heating (kWh/m2/yr)

Cooling (kWh/m2/yr)

Reduction

Technological detailing

REALIZZATO CON UN PRODOTTO AUTODESK VERSIONE PER STUDENTI

High-performance resilient soundproofing profile th. 6 mm

-30,82%

120

0

Custom facade design

5 kN

-60.89%

Zinc plated carbon steel double "T" profile

Zinc plated carbon steel screw for timber

-76.58%

add skin as shading

10 kN

Hidden alluminium alloy bracket with holes

lighting

-85.65%

Glulam beam , dim. 12 x 28 cm

6 kNm

PV panels

PV Production (kWh/m2/yr)

Threaded bolt with screw nut Glulam column, dim. 30x30 cm

PART 3: SUSTAINABILITY

REALIZZATO CON UN PRODOTTO AUTODESK VERSIONE PER STUDENTI

29

30


Facade Blow-Up

PART 3: SUSTAINABILITY Renan Prandini

31 West Elevation

32


Facade Blow-Up

PART 3: SUSTAINABILITY Renan Prandini

31 West Elevation

32


Renan Prandini

RE-STADIUM Rethinking Sports facilities for adaptive reuse 1st Prize for the most innovative thesis in sustainable construction Finalist at Adaptive Reuse Architectural Competition with Shohei Yamashita e Olena Kopytina

CLOSED TYPOLOGY OF THE CITY BLOCK

PART 3: SUSTAINABILITY

APARTMENT TYPOLOGY 1

BROOKLYN MORPHOLOGY

ACESSBILITY

MULTIFUNCTIONAL BACKYARDS

Players

Module is simply supported

Media

VIP

M16 Bolts

Visitors

Steel rod anchoring

Services

16 mm steel plate PREFAB BRACED STEEL MODULES

Ceiling Joist: C150@800 mmm Post: SHS 100x100x10

Tensioned Steel Rod Turnbuckle

Bracing Strap: 200x14 Floor Joist: C200 @600mm Corner Post: SHS 250x250x16

RE-STADIUM

33

Concrete floor connection and tie plate MODULE JOINING

STADIUM REQUIREMENTS

34


Renan Prandini

RE-STADIUM Rethinking Sports facilities for adaptive reuse 1st Prize for the most innovative thesis in sustainable construction Finalist at Adaptive Reuse Architectural Competition with Shohei Yamashita e Olena Kopytina

CLOSED TYPOLOGY OF THE CITY BLOCK

PART 3: SUSTAINABILITY

APARTMENT TYPOLOGY 1

BROOKLYN MORPHOLOGY

ACESSBILITY

MULTIFUNCTIONAL BACKYARDS

Players

Module is simply supported

Media

VIP

M16 Bolts

Visitors

Steel rod anchoring

Services

16 mm steel plate PREFAB BRACED STEEL MODULES

Ceiling Joist: C150@800 mmm Post: SHS 100x100x10

Tensioned Steel Rod Turnbuckle

Bracing Strap: 200x14 Floor Joist: C200 @600mm Corner Post: SHS 250x250x16

RE-STADIUM

33

Concrete floor connection and tie plate MODULE JOINING

STADIUM REQUIREMENTS

34


Renan Prandini

PV Panel Systems

Shading System

- 3 °tilted for Self-cleaning - Pmax = 300 W - LG Mono X Plus

- Plants - Vertical Wooden Louver - Protection for West side

2 1

Natural Sunlight

Wind Breaker

- East side

- Vegetation - Green Buffer - Privacy

3

4

Low-Emissions Window - Highly insulated - U = 1.1 W/m²K

6

5

7

Green Courtyard Heat Recovery System

- Water Retention - Biodiversity - Mitigation of Heat Island Effect

- Heat Transfer

Highly Insulated Wall

Highly Insulated Slab

Fan Coil Unit

- U = 0.07 W/m²K

- U = 0.07 W/m²K

- Heating System

Electric Storage

Geothermal Heat Pump

- Storage - Using electric cars as battery

- Using Natural Resource

7

8

Building acting on winter operation

9

PART 3: SUSTAINABILITY

DF: Quality of natural light

Underlit: highlights the underlit areas

sDA: Efficiency upon the entrance of natural light

ASE: highlights areas where glare might happen

Daylight analysis

35

10

1 2x12.5 mm plasterboards 200 mm C-profile 100 mm Mineral insulation Metal decking profile 50 mm concrete screed Waterproof and airtight membrane 2x100 mm XPS insulation 50 mm white gravel

3 150 mm C-profile Metal decking 150 mm concrete slab 150 mm EPS insulation 150 mm White gravel

2 15 mm plaster rendering with fiber mesh 150 mm Polystyrene Insulation 12.5 mm Plywood 100 mm Soft insulation 50 mm air cavity

5 Triple glazing door

4 Vertical brise soleil: 155 mm movable blades

6 Top module floor: . 20 mm Wood flooring . 100 mm EPS insulation . 15 mm plywood sheathing . 200 mm C-profiles at 600 mm . 100 mm Mineral Insulation . 12.5 Plywood board 50 mm Construction gap Bottom module ceiling: .15 mm Plywood board .100 mm C-section joists at 600 mm . Resilient bars . 2x12.5 mm Plasterboards

7 Raised underfloor construction Waterproof membrane 100 mm concrete screed Metal decking 100 mm C-profile joist Suspended ceiling 96x16 mm finishing wood tiles 8

Glass parapet 60x12.5 mm stainless steel bars at 800 mm

9

Triple glazing window, PVC framing U = 0.96 W/m²K; SHGC = 0.43 VT = 0.35

10 Raised underfloor construction Waterproof membrane 100 mm XPS insulation Airtight membrane 100 mm concrete screed Insulated bottom module ceiling

36


Renan Prandini

PV Panel Systems

Shading System

- 3 °tilted for Self-cleaning - Pmax = 300 W - LG Mono X Plus

- Plants - Vertical Wooden Louver - Protection for West side

2 1

Natural Sunlight

Wind Breaker

- East side

- Vegetation - Green Buffer - Privacy

3

4

Low-Emissions Window - Highly insulated - U = 1.1 W/m²K

6

5

7

Green Courtyard Heat Recovery System

- Water Retention - Biodiversity - Mitigation of Heat Island Effect

- Heat Transfer

Highly Insulated Wall

Highly Insulated Slab

Fan Coil Unit

- U = 0.07 W/m²K

- U = 0.07 W/m²K

- Heating System

Electric Storage

Geothermal Heat Pump

- Storage - Using electric cars as battery

- Using Natural Resource

7

8

Building acting on winter operation

9

PART 3: SUSTAINABILITY

DF: Quality of natural light

Underlit: highlights the underlit areas

sDA: Efficiency upon the entrance of natural light

ASE: highlights areas where glare might happen

Daylight analysis

35

10

1 2x12.5 mm plasterboards 200 mm C-profile 100 mm Mineral insulation Metal decking profile 50 mm concrete screed Waterproof and airtight membrane 2x100 mm XPS insulation 50 mm white gravel

3 150 mm C-profile Metal decking 150 mm concrete slab 150 mm EPS insulation 150 mm White gravel

2 15 mm plaster rendering with fiber mesh 150 mm Polystyrene Insulation 12.5 mm Plywood 100 mm Soft insulation 50 mm air cavity

5 Triple glazing door

4 Vertical brise soleil: 155 mm movable blades

6 Top module floor: . 20 mm Wood flooring . 100 mm EPS insulation . 15 mm plywood sheathing . 200 mm C-profiles at 600 mm . 100 mm Mineral Insulation . 12.5 Plywood board 50 mm Construction gap Bottom module ceiling: .15 mm Plywood board .100 mm C-section joists at 600 mm . Resilient bars . 2x12.5 mm Plasterboards

7 Raised underfloor construction Waterproof membrane 100 mm concrete screed Metal decking 100 mm C-profile joist Suspended ceiling 96x16 mm finishing wood tiles 8

Glass parapet 60x12.5 mm stainless steel bars at 800 mm

9

Triple glazing window, PVC framing U = 0.96 W/m²K; SHGC = 0.43 VT = 0.35

10 Raised underfloor construction Waterproof membrane 100 mm XPS insulation Airtight membrane 100 mm concrete screed Insulated bottom module ceiling

36


Renan Prandini renan.pran@gmail.com +55 11 95430 7174 behance.net/renanprandini


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.