Special Report
Paris Agreement: Special Report
Paris Agreement
A
t the 2015 United Nations’ climate negotiations in Paris (COP21), countries across the globe pledged to keep global temperature rise below 1.5°C. But current policy is set to heat the planet by more than 3°C. To help close this gap between promises and reality, Article 6 of the Paris Agreement – the piece of legislation responsible for setting up the mechanisms for a worldwide carbon emissions trading system – was to be finalised at the end of last year in Madrid, at COP25. The aim of Article 6 is to create an emissions accounting system that is ‘so transparent that anyone can look at it and see what deals are being done,’ says Clare Shakya, Director of Climate Change Research at the International Institute for Environment and
Development (IIED). However, even after extra days of negotiations, COP25 finished with Article 6 unresolved.
Cost of indecision The negotiations ‘can get really complicated – there is a lot on the table, lots of issues and different opinions,’ says Stefano de Clara, Director of International Policy at the International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) and one of the authors of the carbon pricing report, The Economic Potential of Article 6 of the Paris Agreement and Implementation Challenges. The report found that international cooperation on decarbonisation could not only cut an additional 5bn tonnes of CO2 equivalent annually by 2030, but also deliver savings of US$250bn every year by 2030, increasing to almost a trillion in 2100. This
could be reinvested in additional climate action. Every year that an emissions trading system is undecided, billions of dollars are potentially lost.
What is Article 6?
Sticking points
The Paris Agreement offers three approaches to international cooperation mechanisms:
The negotiations on these savings came to a halt as influential nations such as China, the US, India, Brazil and Australia drew impassable red lines. The three major stumbling blocks in negotiations were ‘double counting’, the transition of ‘old’ carbon emission reductions, and the inclusion of a mechanism to create an international fund for climate change mitigation and adaption. ‘Double counting’ is when governments count reduced emissions, but any private companies or agencies that may have assisted the government can also lay claim
Article 6.2 lets countries strike bilateral and voluntary agreements to trade carbon units Article 6.4 creates a centralised UN governance system for countries and the private sector to trade emissions reductions anywhere in the world. This system, known as the Sustainable Development Mechanism, replaces the Clean Development Mechanism of the Kyoto Protocol Article 6.8 develops a framework for cooperation between countries to reduce emissions outside market mechanisms, such as aid
What is Article 6 and why is it important?
to these same reduced emissions. Most parties believe private sector emission reductions should be included in a country’s emission count. ‘It is a philosophical difference,’ says Shakya. ‘We knew it would be a big issue.’ The second issue is whether or not to include ‘old’ emissions that were reduced under the Kyoto Protocol. The counterargument is that global emissions increase every year, so counting past reductions would skewer the final count. The third debate, climate change mitigation and adaption funding, stalled as island nations, the EU and developing countries spoke with ‘one voice’ to include a funding mechanism, says Sandra Greiner, Lead Consultant at Climate Focus and one of the authors of the report Moving Towards Next Generation Carbon Markets, Observations from Article 6 Pilots. Opposing this are countries with regional programmes – such as the US and Canada – that are concerned it would ‘interfere’
with national tax regimes, explains Shakya. ‘It’s a major red line,’ adds Greiner.
Taking the lead These three issues are tabled for COP26 negotiations. ‘No deal is better than a bad deal,’ says Shakya, adding that ‘the worst thing would be to give countries a “get out of jail free” card.’ But without agreed negotiations, ‘what happens in the meantime, in the absence of rules?’ asks de Clara. Some companies are making their own rules, ‘taking the lead in voluntary offsetting’, as Greiner says. One example is UK airline EasyJet, which has partnered with Climate Focus to become the first airline to announce that it is offsetting all its carbon emissions. ‘EasyJet did that without Article 6,’ says Grenier. ‘You don’t have to wait.’ There are also the 31 nations – led by Costa Rica, and including the UK – that agreed on ‘the San Jose Principles’. These exclude ‘double counting’ and ‘old’ emissions, and have no adaptation funding
IMAGES: XXXXXXXX
Article 6 offers a path to significantly raising climate ambition or lowering costs, while engaging the private sector and spreading finance, technology and expertise into new areas, writes Lucy Woods
14 energyfocus | www.the-eic.com
www.the-eic.com | energyfocus
15