12.
The sequences of events are as follows: Hon. Fernando Tapia presided over the hearing on March 3, 2010 starting at approximately 11:15 PM. His judicial profile where he is titled as Hon. Fernando Tapia is attached as exhibit 1. Please note at no point in his NYS Unified Court System profile is Fernando Tapia acknowledged as a judge other than in his one Bronx experience listed. Please note that under fictional administration presumption criminally acts as authority. Please see the next exhibit where several characters are identified and presumed to be judges by the title of Hon. and they too are not judges.
13.
The alleged Defendant Miriam Snyder brought a witness to court. His name is Anthony Diedrick. His Affidavit will be sent to the court separately.
14.
This pre trial hearing began with the calling of Worldwide Asset II, (CREDIT CARD COMPANY FICTION) verses Miriam Snyder. Please note the alleged defendant has no business account or relations with this money laundering fictional entity.
15.
The Alleged defendant, her witness and an estranged woman approached the bench. The woman was not Christopher Grant, the person named on the summons, who in his pleadings has acted as attorney and plaintiff.
16.
Discrepancies: After the calling of names, the estranged woman went to the bench and did not identify herself. She said this was a commercial transaction and Miriam Snyder owed money.
17.
The alleged defendant Miriam Snyder said first and foremost, this woman is not Christopher Grant, the name on the summons and the name being used to allegedly sue me. The alleged Defendant further stated that according to the rules of the court, specifically based on the Rules of the Chief Administrative Judge Rule/Part 130 this matter should be dismissed based on Christopher Grant’s unjustified failure to appear. Please see exhibit 2 attached: Rules of the Chief Administrative Judge, Part 130-3 Imposition of Financial Sanctions Or Costs For Unjustified Failure To Attend A Scheduled Court Appearance.
18.
Hon. Tapia, while acting as judge, stated that rules do not have to be followed and that rules were made to be broken.
I looked at my witness
and Fernando Tapia told me not to look at my witness to look at him. His actions were criminal, hit man type and do not belong in a court of law.
79