It also aims to provide readers and users with an expanded range of materials to enhance practical application of tools that promote transparency in urban governance. This section lists the additional resource materials in the following order: Section 4.2 Alphabetical Listing of Resource Materials Section 4.3 Full Description of Resource Materials, Listed by Organization Section 4.4 Additional References Section 4.2 enables the users to search for a particular resource by alphabetical order. Under Section 4.3, the tools are listed by the organization which has developed or disseminated them. Each resource is presented in a standard format, with a summary description of what it is and how it can be applied. In addition, contact information is given for each product, so as to enable the user to contact those responsible for preparing or disseminating it. This detailed description is intended to provide support to users who may wish to adopt a particular approach or a combination of approaches to suit their particular context. Section 4.4 lists the additional references used in this publication. 4.2
152
GENERAL LISTING IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER
1.
Access to Information in Developing Countries, Transparency International.
2.
Best Practises Database, UN-HABITAT.
3.
Checklist for E-Government Leaders – Policy Brief, OECD.
4.
Citizenship Knows No Age: Children’s Participation in the Governance and Municipal Budget of Barra Mansa, UNICEF and IIED.
5.
Coalition-Building to Fight Corruption, World Bank Institute.
6.
CORIS – “Corruption Online Research and Information System”, Transparency International.
7.
Conflicts of Interest: Legislators, Ministers and Public Officials, Transparency International.
8.
Corporate Governance – Improvement and Trust in Local Public Services, Audit Commission, UK.
9.
Corruption and Environment at the Local Level, Transparency International.
10.
The Corruption Fighters’ Toolkit, Transparency International.
11.
Country Assessment in Accountability and Transparency – CONTACT, UNDP.
12.
Country Corruption Assessment Report – South Africa, Government of South Africa and UNODC/ROSA.
U
R
B
A
N
G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E
T
O
O
L
K
I
T
S
E
R
I
E
S