Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, Hi-Tech city, Hyderabad - 2020 by RAMYA RELANGI

COMPREHENSIVE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION STUDY HI-TECH CITY, HYDERABAD

Presented by: Masters in Transport Planning and Logistics Management: 2019- 2021

INTRODUCTION

Aim

To evaluate the existing transportation scenario and provide recommendation through comprehensive traffic and transportation study of Hitech city Hyderabad

OBJECTIVE I. II. III.

To analyze existing travel character, usage and accessibility of public transport. Develop a baseline scenario for identification of challenges and issues for public transport. Suggest recommendations on a short-term basis to ensuring the requisite transportation.

Methodology

Source- Author Generated

CITY PROFILE Hyderabad, the capital of Telangana, and also the largest city in the state is among the largest urban areas of India covering an area of 625 Sq. km including the entire Hyderabad district of 172 Sq. km and about 452 Sq. km areas in Rangareddy and Medak districts surrounding

STUDY AREA PROFILE The study area extends over an area of about 165 sq. km. It includes four districts namely, Rangareddy, Sangareddy, Medchal Malkajigiri and Hyderabad. Study area comes under Cyberabad Commissionerate which includes 22 wards with population of 957241 (census 2011), which comes 10 under circles (LEA., 2014).

INTRODUCTION 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

The study includes the review of the various transport surveys conducted, together with the identification of the transport related problem in the study area. Hyderabad urban area growth was very rapid and one of the fastest growing metropolises in India, with population of 9.5 million (census 2011). The Information Technology (IT) revolution, economic globalization and the political leadership have been the catalysis in nurturing Hyderabad

• The region shares its border with Nagpur city in the North, Bangalore in the South, Vishakhapatnam in the East, Mumbai in the West, beside many other cities around. Hyderabad is situated on the Deccan Plateau, the largest of the three regions of Andhra Pradesh. The most important rivers here are Musi, Krishna, Godavari and Manjira. • Study area is also well connected with another main city Warangal which is 150 KM from and connected through NH163 and 3-hour journey. The region shares its border in the east with Andhra Pradesh in the west with Maharashtra in the south with Karnataka and in the north with Odisha.

• Study area lies in the four district of Telangana state. These are Sangareddy, Rangareddy, Medchil and Hyderabad. These areas are well connected with road, MMTS and Railway. NH 65 connects study area to Sangareddy. old Mumbai highway connects Rangareddy and Medchil is connected through NH 44. •

The study area lies in north west part of Hyderabad . Secunderabad and Yousufguda are located on the East of study area. On the West, BHEL and Muthangi are situated. On the South, Toli Chowki and on the North, IDA Jeedimetla and Whisper valley are located. These areas are well connected through roads and some of the areas with MMTS and Metro.

CITY

DISTANCE

Time(hr.)

Mumbai

700

Nagpur

500

Pune

560

Bengaluru

570

Chennai

630

Vijayawada

300

Visakhapatnam

650

CONNECTIVITY NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND STATE HIGHWAYS The study area is demarcated in red boundary, comprises of four districts out of the 33 districts of Telangana and one is the capital district of Telangana out of the 4 districts. The study area covers an area of about 165 sq. km. with a base population of 13 lakhs approximately. The study area is surrounded by an outer ring road that connects 4 NHs (i.e. NH 65 , NH 44 (AH 43 North- South corridor), NH-163, SH-1, SH-2, SH-4, SH-5, SH-6, and SH-19)

CONNECTIVITY OF STUDY AREA WITH RAILWAY AND AIRPORTS Airports: There are five major airports nearby study area i.e. Rajiv Gandhi International Airport, Hyderabad, Begumpet Airport, Old Airport Hyderabad, Warangal Airport, Ramagundam Airport, Shamshabad Airport that connects Hyderabad to other states of world.

Railways: South Central Railway, a zone of Indian Railways, is headquartered in Secunderabad. Apart from services provided with inter-city connectivity, this zone provides suburban transport services in Hyderabad & Secunderabad through MMTS.

REGIONAL CONTEXT 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

REGIONAL CONTEXT

•

The city is witnessing a rapid expansion, industrial boom, increased trade opportunities coupled with high population growth rate (decadal growth rate of 40%), accelerated due to migration from rural areas. In 1992, the major growth was around the Secundrabad area. Hitech city was founded in 1998 which is spread across 81ha. After this growth has started in North West of city. During the year 2003 saturation of the MCH region takes place due to which HUDA experience higher growth because of the new initiatives. Hyderabad is one of the fastest growing cities in the country with a potential to become the cyber capital of India.

SPATIAL GROWTH OF THE STUDY AREA •

In this map, we have shown the spatial growth for the study area from the year 1998 to 2018, a period of two decades. Here we have shown the settlement pattern for the year 2000, 2008 and 2016 in which the maximum changes in settlement pattern took place.

•

The development for the year 2000 took place where the NH 9 and old Mumbai highway converge and leads to Mumbai and another development corridor was the NH 9 and Bal-Nagar main road diverging from each other. Till the year 2008, settlement growth took place along the Medak road, HMT road, old Mumbai Highway and NH 9 present along the south east direction of the study area.

•

Till the year 2016, growth took place along the Old Mumbai Highway Corridor at the centre of the Study Area. From this we can say that the major growth corridors were the NH 9 and Mumbai Highway Corridor and the growth took place along the North east to south direction as well as growth also taking place at the centre of the study area.

Demographic profile Total population Total household Average household size Workforce participation rate

Hyderabad( 2011) Study area (2011) 3943323 849051

957241 317367

4.64 35.84%

3.01 39.73%

SPATIAL GROWTH 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

SPATIAL GROWTH OF HYDERABAD

ECONOMIC DRIVER OF STUDY AREA

LAND COVER 2020

Source: Author Generated

Source: Author Generated Map,2020(GIS)

Here we have shown the land use map of the year 2012, 2020 and 2031. We have calculated the types of land use of each year in square kilometers and have compared them and have shown the difference in the table above.

LAND USE 2012

EXISTING LAND USE 2020

PROPOSED LAND USE 2031

Source: HMDA Master Plan,2012

Source: Author Generated Map,2020(GIS)

Source: HMDA Master Plan,2031

We have also shown the composition of the land use for the following three years through maps. From the following table we observed that the land use for the year 2012 and the existing land use for the year 2020 doesn’t show much change except for the increase in 7% of residential area and a decrease of 2% of undeveloped land but when we compare the map of the year 2020 and the proposed land use for the year 2031 we can observe that there is a major change in the residential and undeveloped land %.

LAND USE

2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

TABLE : CHANGES IN LAND USE IN THE YEAR 2012, 2020 AND 2031

•

For the detail study of area, it is divided into 87 internal TAZ’s and 7 external TAZ’s

•

There are used to segregate the individual household and premises into manageable localities for modelling purpose. The two main things that need to be decided are the number of zones, and their size. The greater the number of zones, the smaller is area covered by each one of them and the better they capture travel pattern of that area.

•

It is advisable to have zone of uniform size in terms of population and employment to achieve better accuracy in estimation. In this process, all the properties and attributes of each zone are assumed to be concentrated in a single point called the “zone centroid” the zone boundaries are ensured to match with census, electoral and administrative boundaries that will enable to capture the socioeconomic data. The size of the traffic zone is managed such that each zone contained, on an average population between 20,000 and 30,000. The population size of any TAZ should not exceed 50,000

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

INTERNAL TAZ DELINEATION

TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONES (TAZ) DELINEATION 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

METRO

1.Telangana State Road Transport Corporation • (TSRTC). 2. Hyderabad Metro Rail Limited (HMRL). 3. Multi-Modal Transport System (MMTS).

•

BUS •

Intra city, intercity/regional and interstate bus service network operated by TSRTC •

•

Types of Buses

1. Metro Luxury (airconditioned) 2. City Sheetal (airconditioned) 3. Metro Deluxe 4. Metro Express Low Floor(Non air-conditioned)

Hyderabad Metro Rail, the Elevated Mass Rapid Transit System of Hyderabad, started operations in 2017. The initial phase of operation was 30 km long, over two corridors. To further connectivity, HMRL tied up with Uber, to set up booking kiosks across stations. Further, bicycle facility was launched on a limited scale

MMTS Metro Bus Stand Railway Line Open Spaces Water Body StudyArea Boundary

MMTS

• Connects various suburbs of Hyderabad. • However, MMTS Services, have been criticized for lack of adequate frequency and inordinate delays.

5. Metro Express 6. City Ordinary 7. Setwin State Government of Telangana sanctioned minibuses as a self-employment generation scheme which plies between different parts of the city.

Source: Author Generated Map,2020(GIS)

DELUXE BUS

TATA MAGIC

TAXIS Metered Auto Rickshaw usually referred to as an "auto", Tata magic, Ola ,Uber, Office Cabs is another widely available taxi in Hyderabad. Shared 'auto' taxis are also a commonplace in Hyderabad.

MMTS METRO

OLA,UBER CABS

TRANSPORT SCENARIO IN HYDERABAD 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

Major Public Transportation agencies in the city

Hyderabad Metropolitan :4900km Study Area : 460km

Road Connectivity NH 65 :From Mumbai Towards Vijayawada. NH 44 : Passes through Study area to Sec Figure showing Arterial Road

C’

A’

30M Collector Street:Hitech City Main Road

A A’ B’

Figure showing Collector Road

B’

47.5M Sub-Arterial Road Hitex Road

Source: Author Generated Map,2020(GIS)

61M Arterial Road NH44 JNTU

C’

S.no

Road Type

Length (km)

Right of Way

% of Roads

1 2 3 4

Outer Ring Road Arterial Road Sub -Arterial Collector Road TOTAL

6 22 42 390 460

150m 41-60m 31-40m Less than 30m

1.3% 4.78% 9.13% 84.7% 100%

TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE-ROAD NETWORK 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

Distribution Of Road Length By : Road Hierarchy & Right of Way

Road Length

Source: Author Generated Map,2020(GIS)

Source: Author

Figures showing Roads with 4 and 6 Lanes

Distribution Of Road Length By -Footpath

Source: Author Generated Map,2020(GIS)

Source: Author

Figures showing Arterial Road with foot path of 1.5m

Distribution Of Road Length By -Median

Source: Author Generated Map,2020(GIS)

Source: Author

Figure Arterial Road with median of 1.5m

TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE ROAD NETWORK 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

Distribution Of Road Length By -Lanes

 Selection of Major Corridors for Analysis Criteria for Selection  Typology of road  Functional characteristics of road  Major connectivity among TAZs Corridor Name

Road Type

NH 65 – Patancheru to ESI hospital

Arterial

28.3

48.7

Old Mumbai Hwy – Lingampally to Raidurg

Sub arterial

14.8

25.5

Sub arterial Sub arterial

6.8 8.1 58

11.7 13.9 100.0

Gachibowli – Miyapur road KPHB – Hitec city main road Total

 Trend in Peak Hour Travel Time

Length (Km)

%Age

Inferences

 South-East part of study area consists of very high concentration of IT industries and other establishments, which decrease the travel speed.  Similarly, speed in NorthEast part is also very less because of the inefficient road infrastructure.

Inferences Source: Author Author generated generated by by Remote Remote Sensing Sensing Application Application Source:

Peak Hour Speed Length (Km) %Age (Kmph) 1 - 10 11 - 15 16 - 20 21 - 25 26 - 40 41 - 60 Total

36.3 89.9 49.4 14.4 12.1 3.5 205.8

17.6 43.7 24.0 7.0 5.9 1.7 100.0

Peak Hour Length in Percentage (%) Speed Collector ORR Arterial Sub Arterial (Kmph) (32.42%) 1 - 10 33.7 15.4 7.8 11 - 15 34.1 46.5 55.8 16 - 20 16.8 30.6 11.5 21 - 25 11.6 6.2 5.0 26 - 40 48.6 3.6 1.1 19.8 41 - 60 51.3 Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Source: Uber Movement Data

 For last 4 years the increase in peak hour travel time is 33% on NH 65, 34% on Old Mumbai Hwy, 37% on Gachibowli - Miyapur road and 40% on KPHB - Hitec city main road.  Reasons for this can be increase in traffic volume, increase in encroachments and deterioration of road.

SPEED CHARACTERISTICS IN NETWORK 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

Selected Corridors Peak Hour Speed in Network

Step Graph * *

Speed (Kmph)

NH 65

Speed in Different Land use 50.00

Avg. Speed 16.68 Kmph

Speed (kmph)

Corridor

40.00

34.68

34.33

30.00

18.97

20.00

Residential Commercial

PSP

Avg. Non-peak Speed Avg. Journey Hour Speed

* Speed (kmph)

Speed (Kmph)

Avg. Speed 14.74 Kmph

15.69

20.00

28.42

13.74

10.00 0.00

Residential Commercial

PSP

speed (kmph)

Speed (Kmph)

Non-peak Hr Speed

* Avg. Speed 9.78 Kmph

30.00

8.85

10.00 0.00

Total Length: 6.8 Km

Commercial

Speed (Kmph)

speed (kmph)

Avg. Non-peak Speed Avg. Journey Hour Speed

Avg. Speed 17.52 Kmph

24.73

21.85

18.21

20.00

Residential

Red star signifies the delay at signalised junctions.

Avg. Peak Hour Speed Avg. Running Speed

33.00

27.50

30.00 20.00

29.92

28.31

22.66 14.15

PSP

Total delay: 37 Min Avg. delay: 2.50 Min/Km Travel Time Index (TTI): 2.0 Maximum speed difference is 21 Kmph Commercial landuse - Lowest running speed of 13.7 Kmph

 Total delay: 23 Min  Avg. delay: 3.28 Min/Km  Travel Time Index (TTI): 2.1  Maximum speed difference is 20 Kmph  Commercial landuse - Lowest running speed of 8.8 Kmph

Avg. Peak Hour Speed Speed Avg. Running

29.48 18.27

10.00 0.00

    

Industrial

40.00

Peak Hr Speed

19.28

18.47

Avg. Non-peak Hour Speed Avg. Journey Speed

KPHB – Hitec City Main Road

Mixed

Total delay: 45 Min Avg. delay: 1.59 Min/Km Travel Time Index (TTI): 1.8 Maximum speed difference is 31 Kmph Commercial landuse - Lowest running speed of 12.9 Kmph

Avg. Peak Hour Speed Speed Avg. Running

31.18

27.31

30.00

Total Length: 14.8 Km Gachibowli – Miyapur Road

Industrial

37.73

40.00

17.96

    

0.00

Old Mumbai Hwy

23.40

19.82

12.92

36.13

10.00

Total Length: 28.3 Km

Total Length: 8.1 Km

40.99

36.54

Inferences

Residential Commercial PSP Avg. Peak Hour Speed Speed Avg. Non-peak Speed Avg. Journey Hour Speed Avg. Running

    

Total delay: 15 Min Avg. delay: 1.85 Min/Km Travel Time Index (TTI): 1.9 Maximum Speed Difference is 20 Kmph Commercial landuse - Lowest running speed of 14.15 Kmph

SPEED CHARACTERISTICS IN NETWORK 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

 Analysis of Major Corridors

The opportunity cost is the cost incurred by spending additional time in commuting which could have instead been used for work or leisure. Here the assumption is, vehicle will move only on the selected route between two places as it is the shortest path and consumes minimum time.  Referred Research paper: “Assessing Cities’ Labour Market Efficiencies Using Mumbai Commuting Data” (WORKING PAPER 03), by IDFC Institute

10 km A 3.1 km

Opportunity Cost of Congestion = Additional hours in commute * [(Probability of working * Wage cost) + {Probability of leisure * (Wage cost/2)}] Required Data Average wage rate for AP for CWS Duration of work

Value 19055 INR per month 54 Hrs / week

Avg. working days in week

6 Days/ week

Daily wage rate Additional hours in commute Probability of working Probability of leisure

Source

NH 65 Old Mumbai Highway Gachibowli - Miyapur Road KPHB – Hitec City Main Road

Inferred from NSO data

Speed characteristics analysis

0.72 0.28

Primary OD survey

1.9

15.1

C 3.3 km

6.1 km

Travel Time Total OCC in OCC per Index (TTI) INR Km in INR 28.3 1.8 45.5 1.6 14.8 2.0 37.3 2.5 6.8 2.1 23.2 3.4 8.1

5.7 km

70.5 INR / hour

Length (Km)

8.7 km

Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) 2019, NSO, MoSPI

 The cost of leisure is assumed to be half this wage cost, supported by work that shows that value of leisure must be less than the wage rate (JOHNSON, M. B. (1966). Travel time and the price of leisure. Economic Inquiry, 135.).  Additionally, Kenneth A. Small suggests that value of commute time is typically estimated to be around half the wage rate (A.Small, K. (December 2012). Valuation of travel time. Economics of Transportation, 2-14.) Corridor Name

1.8

Inferences This analysis shows the economic effectiveness of congestion on the EWS category of commuters. It is inferred that, congestion on Gachibowli – Miyapur road affects commuters the most; While the least on the NH 65.

6.4 km

Source: Author generated by Remote Sensing Application

Sl No Direction A North B East C South-East D South E South-West F West G North-West

5 Min 0.3 km 3.0 km 2.9 km 2.6 km 1.2 km 3.5 km 3.2 km

15 Min 0.8 km 4.7 km 3.1 km 3.9 km 2.5 km 5.3 km 5.1 km

25 Min 3.1 km 5.7 km 3.3 km 6.4 km 6.1 km 8.7 km 10 km

 East - West corridor (A & B) has better 35 Min 45 Min speed due to presence of NH, least 6.0 km 8.8 km establishments and no encroachments. 8.5 km 12 km  South corridor (D) has good speed due to 8.6 km 11 km better infrastructure & less encroachment. 7.0 km 10 km  North - East corridor (G) has very high speed due to wider road of NH 65. 10 km 12 km  South – East corridor (C) offers sudden 11 km 14 km increase in travel time due to dense 14 km 16 km establishments (mainly IT industries).

SPEED CHARACTERISTICS IN NETWORK

2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

Travel Time Isochrones

 Opportunity Cost of Congestion

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

Survey Locations To study the traffic flow entering and leaving the study area, traffic volume count surveys were performed at all the cordon points, midblock locations and screen line to understand the traffic characteristics of the study area. Points Location

Direction

OC1

Nehru Outer Towards Sangareddy Ring Road Towards Patancheru

OC2

Bollaram Road

Towards Miyapur

Nizampet Road

Towards JNTU Cross Roads

OC3

OC4

OC5

OC6

Towards Bachpally

Towards Nizampet Village

Prasanth Towards kukatpally Nagar Road Towards Bachpally Usha Mullapudi Road

Towards Kailash Hills

Balanagar Main Road

Towards Kukatpally

Towards KPHB

Towards Bowenpally

MB1

Chanda Towards Chanda Nagar Nagar Road Towards Papireddy Nagar

MB2

Miyapur Road

Towards Lingampally

KPHB Road

Towards JNTU Cross Roads

MB3

Towards JNTU

Towards Nizampet Village MB4

MB5

MB6

MB7

Kukatpally Road 100 Road

Towards Hitech City Towards Miyapur

Feet Towards Hitech City

Balanagar Road

Towards S N Nagar Towards Bowenpally Towards Kukatpally

Telecom Towards Gacchibowli Nagar Road Towards Mehendipatnam

Points Location

Direction

SL1

Towards Station

lingampally

Lingampally

Railway

Towards University of Hyderabad SL2

Hafeezpet Road Towards Kondapur Towards Allwyn Road

SL3

Hitech city Road Towards Hitech City Towards JNTU

SL4

Sanath Road

Nagar Towards Erragadda Towards Sanath Nagar

Average Daily Traffic S. No

Location

Total Vehicles

PCU's

Towards Study Area

4.05 Lakhs

4.34 Lakhs

Away from Study Area

3.08 Lakhs

3.50 Lakhs

Total Vehicles and PCU's Count for 24 Hours shows that majority of vehicles move towards the study area. Presence of major trip attracting establishments like IT-parks in the study area is one of the reasons for this trend. Due to limitations in conducting the survey, the 24 hours volume is obtained considering the growth factor for few common locations from the CTTS2013 (assuming the growth factor remains same) and the peak hour data from primary survey. The directional flow is assumed to be equal at a location and extrapolation is done to obtain only approximate daily traffic volume.

Legend

Figure 1: Map showing 24 Hours Daily Traffic(Source: Author generated by Primary Survey)

Fig 3: graphs showing ADT at mid-point survey locations

Fig 4: graphs showing ADT at screen line survey locations

TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT : ANALYSIS

Fig 2: graphs showing ADT at outer cordon survey locations

2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Peak-hour Traffic Characteristics N

o 2 Wheeler private vehicle occupies The maximum mode share as 51% that increases to 72% at SL and 62% at MB. o Car(4- Wheelers composition decreases from east to west movement. o Buses composition as 0.7% at MB decreasing from 0.1% at OC and marginally increasing to 0.2% at MB. o 3 Wheelers/ Auto/ Shared Auto composition as 18% almost uniform throughout area. o LCV/ HCV is observed at OC abutting land use near this location industrial and warehouses.

CLASSIFICATION

Traffic composition o PASSENGER AND GOODS: Out of Total Vehicular Count, 97.5% passenger and 2.4% Goods o MOTORIZED AND NMT: Out of Total Vehicular Count, 99.9% is Motorized and 0.1% is NMT. o PRIVATE AND PUBLIC Out of Total Vehicular Count, 18.5% public and 81.5% Private.

MOTERISED NON- MOTERISED

PRIVATE

81.5 %

PUBLIC

18.50

PASSANGER

97.5%

COMODITY

2.40%

PRIVATE

0.10%

Legend

22581

Peak Hour Traffic Count- Directional Split 19717

25000

8041

7906

5792

5565

726

826

7728

11587

14956

15381

Figure: Map showing 24 Hours Daily Traffic(Source: Author generated by Primary Survey)

11343

7538

7027

8015

7598

9189

8534

5187

4563

4067

3965

6399

4690

4310

3540

3494

3535

5000

4418

10000

6503

9502

10281

10908

11066

15000

12039

14956

15381

20000

0 OC 1 OC 2 OC 3 OC 4 OC 5 OC 6 OC 7 OC 8 MB 1 MB 2 MB 3 MB 4 MB 5 MB 6 MB 7 SL 1 SL 2 SL 3 SL 4 TOTAL VEHICLES

PCU

OUT

Maximum Traffic was found SOUTH WEST cordons at OC8 Shaikpet Dargah and OC6 Balanagar Main Road.

Directional split : It can be observed

Maximum intra city Traffic was found at MB7 Telecom Nagar Road prominent establishments- cyber hub. The abutting landuse near this location PSP and a part is commercial.

inbound traffic is more then outbound at almost all location due to major establishments- present except at MB5 and MB6 due to construction activities and along SL1 and SL due residential activities.

It can be observed Maximum Traffic was found at SL4 Sanath Nagar Road. With Highest percentage of Goods vehicles i.e. 5%.

The flow of traffic moment along NH is constant while there is concentration of traffic SOUTH WEST zone of study area.

TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT : ANALYSIS

2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

Peak hour volume : map Peak hour share:

SCREEN LINE OUTER CORDON

LOCATIONS TOTAL PCU(24 HOURS) PEAK HOUR PCU PEAK HOUR PCU (%) V/C Lingamplally Road 57374 5565 9 1.03 Hafeezpet Road 105807 8041 7 0.9 Hitech city Road 84919 7277 9 1.3 Sanath Nagar Road 259431 19716 7 2.3

LOCATIONS Nehru Outer Ring Road Bollaram Road Nizampet Road Prasanath Nagar Road Usha Mullapudi Road Balanagar Main Road Madhpur Metro Station Shaikpet Dargah

MID BLOCK

LOCATIONS Chanda Nagar Road

TOTAL PCU(24 HOURS) 65262 43172 47367 84189 44695 259432 56998 164026

PEAK HOUR PCU PEAK HOUR PCU (%) V/C 6134 9 0.7 3540 8 1.4 4309 9 1.7 6397 7 1.1 4066 9 1.03 18160 7 2.1 5186 9 0.9 12466 7 1.4

TOTAL PCU(24 HOURS) PEAK HOUR PCU

PEAK HOUR PCU (%) V/C

LOS F D F F

LOS C F F F F F D F

LOS

7974

725

1.0 E

105807

10907

2.01 F

KPHB Road

93778

8533

1.01 E

Kukatpally Road

83489

7596

1.4 F

100 Feet Road

77214

7025

259431

11342

28829

3750

Miyapur Road

Balanagar Road Telecom Nagar Road

CARRAIGE WAY

DIRECTIONS

4 lane divided

Lingampally Railway Station

University of Hyderabad

6 lane divided

Kondapur

Allwyn Road

4 lane divided

Hitech City

KPHB

6 lane divided

Erragadda

Sanath Nagar

CARRAIGE WAY 6 lanes with division

DIRECTIONS Patancheru

Sangareddy

2 lane divided 2 lane divided 4 lane divided 1 lanes with division 2 lanes with division 6 lane divided 2 lane divided

Bachpally JNTU kukatpally KPHB Bowenpally Cyber Towers Mehendipatnam

CARRAIGE WAY 4 lanes with division 4 lane divided

DIRECTIONS Towards Chanda Nagar Papireddy Nagar

Miyapur Nizampet Village Bachpally Sindhi Hills Kukatpally Madhapur Raidurg

1.3 F

6 lane divided 4 lane divided 4 lanes divided

Bachpally JNTU Cross Roads Hitech City Hitech City

Miyapur Nizampet Village Miyapur S N Nagar

1.2 F

2 lane divided

0.4 B

Bowenpally

Kukatpally

6 lane divided

Cyber Towers

Madhapur

The Level of service is calculated from the V/C (Volume/Capacity) ratio. As per IRC 160:1990 Level of Services from A to F is defined as per different V/C ratios, Level of Comfort and Nature of flow. And the V/C is calculated by the Geometric design standards for Urban Roads as per IRC 86: 1993.

TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT : ANALYSIS 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

LOS -LEVEL OF SERVICE

966

Total No. of Vehicles/day (TVC data)

Expansion Factor

2549274

2639

100 3 - WHEELER 2 - WHEELER 3 - WHEELER Car/Jeep

TRIP DISTRIBUTION

E–I 48%

I–E 33%

E–E 19%

TRIP PURPOSE DISTRIBUTION 3%

Work Education

Social

10%

Recreation Business

73%

Shopping Health

FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF TRIPS

Car/Jeep

8.3

HCV

Bus

LCV

HCV

11.3

Magic

LCV

7.1

Magic

6.1

WORK

50 25

7.7 7.4

SHOPPING

RECREATION

11.5

SHOPPING

7.9

BUSINESS

11.3

SOCIAL

7.7

HEALTH

7.5

SOCIAL HEALTH

WORK

RECEATIONAL EDUCATION BUSINESS

80%

Monthly

25 0

AVERAGE OCCUPANCY

2.4

WORK

75 50

23 25 41 34 23 24

EDUCATIONAL

PURPOSE

Median Trip Time (min)

RECEATIONAL

WORK

EDUCATION

RECREATION

SHOPPING

BUSINESS

SOCIAL

HEALTH

SHOPPING BUSINESS

SOCIAL HEALTH

PURPOSE 18

1.5

MODE AND PURPOSE WISE TRIP DISTRIBUTION

More than once a day Weekly 2 to 3 times a week Biweekly

3 - WHEELER 2 - WHEELER Car/Jeep 3 - WHEELER Bus Car/Jeep HCV Bus LCV HCV Magic LCV Magic

Median Trip 100 Length (Km

PURPOSE

EDUCATIONAL

3.4

MODE

Median Trip Time (min)

TTFD – PURPOSE WISE

Daily (Once)

12%

2 - WHEELER

7.1

Bus

1% 1% 6%

7.6

TLFD – PURPOSE WISE 100

2% 2%

MODE

2 - WHEELER 75

Median Trip 100 Length (Km)

2.3

WORK EDUCATIONAL RECREATIONAL SHOPPING BUSINESS SOCIAL HEALTH Total (%)

MODE (%) 2 - Wheeer 3 - Wheeler Car/Jeep 52.1 15.8 13 37.2 25.4 12.9 51.9 14 19 54 15 16 41 17 25 39.3 22.4 21.4 34 22 22 44.2

18.8

18.5

Bus 7.1 21.4 14 15 17 12.4 22

HCV 1.4 0 0 0 0 0 0

LCV 3.7 0 0 0 0 0 0

Magic 6.9 3.1 1.1 0 0 4.5 0

15.6

0.2

0.5

2.2

Total (%) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

ROAD SIDE ORIGIN-DESTINATION 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

No. of Samples collected

TTFD – MODE WISE

TLFD – MODE WISE

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad The highest no. of trip interchanges are observed between TAZs no. 88 & 7, this may be due to predominant Industrial land use of TAZ 7. TAZ No. 57 & 93 also show high no. of trip interchanges, this may be due to the presence of IT sector and high percent of commercial land use in TAZ 57.

Thematic map for Trip origin shows that maority of the trips are originated from external zones and in the residential areas of KPHB (Taz 25), Miyapur (18), Kondapur (61-63) in the study area. Thematic map for Trip destinations shows that majority of the trip destinations are towards the IT sector and the GHMC area which is towards the south west of the study area

ROAD SIDE ORIGIN-DESTINATION

2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

Classification of Establishments The total no. of establishments surveyed in the study area are 200. Commercial Area contributes 6% of the land use

Existing Land use 2020

Public and Semi Public contributes 9% of the land use

Industrial Area contributes 7% of the land use in the study area. Number of establishments surveyed in the Study Area-200 Percentage distribution of surveyed samples of Establishments Type of Establishment Survey

% break up

Units

Commercial Public & Semi Public Industrial

147 32 21

73.5 16 10.5

Methodology of Calculating Total Attractions Identification of parameters to be studied for Trip Attraction

Compilation of sample data in terms of Floor area, employees and visitors. Calculating attraction rates/100 sq.m establishment wise, TAZ wise by dividing attraction by floor area.

Using rate, expanding the sample and calculating total attractions.

ESTABLISHMENT ANALYSIS 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Total Employees Trip Attraction Rate = x 100 (employees/100sqm) Total Floor Area(sqm) Land use type

Employment Rate/100Sqm

Number of Employment Trip attractions

Commercial Public & Semi Public Industrial

21 6.8 13.3

876931 554451 87770

Total Visitors Trip Attraction Rate = x 100 (Visitors/100sqm) Total Floor Area(sqm) Land use type

876931

58 16 35.2

154752 97844 15490

554451

200000

87770 Commercial Commercial

Public & Semi Public Public & Semi Public

52 40 45

1031683 652296 103261

652296

600000 15490

Public and Semi Public contributes 9% of the land use, Taz 78 and 25 attracts the max.number of trips for PSP,Taz 78 consists of HCU and JNTU in Taz number 25.

Commercial Area contributes 6% of the land use ,The Southern part of the Study Area attracts the maximum Commercial trips i.e, Taz 65,66,67, 82.

400000 103261

200000 0

Commercial

Number of Trip attractions

1031683

800000

97844

Trip Rates/100Sqm

Total number of Establishment trips attracted to the Study area -17,87,240 .

Number of Trip attractions 1000000

50000

200000

Commercial Public & Semi Public Industrial 1200000

154752

100000

400000

Land use type

Number of Visitors Trip attractions 150000

800000 600000

Number of Visitors Trip attractions

Commercial Public & Semi Public Industrial

Number of Employment Trip attractions 1000000

Visitors Rate/100Sqm

Total Employees + Visitors Total Trip = x 100 Attraction Rate Total Floor Area(sqm) (/100sqm)

Industrial Commercial

Public & Semi Public Public & Semi Public

Industrial Industrial

Commercial Commercial

Public & Semi Public

Industrial

Total Trips Attracted to Commercial Establishment

Trip Attraction Rate to Commercial Area –52/100Sq.m Total number of Trip Attractions to Commercial Area – 10,31,683

Total Trips Attracted to the Public & Semi-Public Establishment

Trip Attraction Rate to PSP – 40/100Sq.m Total number of Trip Attractions to PSP – 6,52,296

Industrial Industrial

Industrial Area contributes 7% of the land use,Taz no. 7,42,48 attracts maximum number of trips BHEL and Bala Nagar Industrial area are the main attraction points.

Total Trips Attracted to Industrial Establishment

Trip Attraction Rate to Industrial Area –45/100Sq.m Total number of Trip Attractions to Industrial Area – 10,3261

ESTABLISHMENT ANALYSIS

2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

Employment Rate

Inferences

Total Attraction Rate

Visitors Rate

AGE/SEX 7%

20%

TRIP LENGTH FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION- MODE WISE 0-14 years 15-64 years Above 65 years

73%

EDUCATION

EDUCATION…

MODE

HOUSEHOLD SURVEY-MODE WISE TLFD CUMULATION 0-5 5-10 10-15 15-20 20-25 25-30 >30 0 32 67 89 95 96 99 100 0 55 91 94 95 96 97 100 0 29 70 93 96 98 98 100 0 23 66 83 91 92 95 100 0 15 48 80 87 90 96 100 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

2 - WHEELER 3 - WHEELER Car/Jeep Bus METRO WALK

TRIP LENGTH FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION- PURPOSE WISE

42%

HOUSEHOLD SURVEY-PURPOSE WISE TLFD CUMULATION 0 0-5 5-10 10-15 15-20 20-25 25-30 >30 0 28 64 87 93 96 98 0 43 82 93 97 98 99 0 36 79 82 85 92 95 0 72 94 99 99 100 100 0 29 43 62 71 86 100

MODE

30 25

16%

13%

12%

5 0

Illeterate

Primary

Secondary

Higher Graduation Post Secondary Graduation

HOUSEHOLD INCOME 50.00%

43.27%

45.00%

Household Monthly Income

40.00% 35.00% 30.00% 25.00%

22.12%

19.17%

20.00% 15.00% 10.00%

7.31%

6.01%

1-3La

<3Lacs

5.00%

25-50k

50k-1Lac

OCCUPATION STATUS OCCUPATIONAL STATUS

60.00%

48.00%

50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00%

19.00%

23.00% 7.00%

10.00%

3.00%

0.00%

Unemployed

Student

Worker

Housewife

Retired

PURPOSE

MEDIAN TRIP LENGTH (KM) 6.71 5.42 5.88 3.47 10.56

WORK 100 EDUCATIONAL 100 RECREATIONAL 100 SHOPPING 100 OTHER 100 Around half of the trips for education, work, shopping, social and recreational purpose lie between 4 to 6 km.

WORK EDUCATIONAL RECEATIONAL SHOPPING OTHER

TRIP TIME FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION- MODE WISE MODE

HOUSEHOLD - MODE WISE TTFD CUMULATION 0-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 >60 0 6 33 58 82 92 99 100 0 8 48 80 92 93 95 100 0 10 17 46 73 88 96 100 0 2 21 46 73 85 87 100 0 5 12 37 81 92 96 100 0 25 98 100 100 100 100 100

2 - WHEELER 3 - WHEELER Car/Jeep Bus METRO WALK

0.00%

Upto 25k

2 - WHEELER 3 - WHEELER Car/Jeep Bus METRO WALK

MEDIAN TRIP LENGTH (KM) 6.34 4.54 6.5 7.04 10.125 1.1

Almost half of the trips made by two wheelers, cars, autos, buses and metro lie between 4 to 7 km

MODE

MODE 2 - WHEELER 3 - WHEELER Car/Jeep Bus METRO WALK

MEDIAN TRIP TIME 23.0 20.3 30.5 30.5 31.6 12.6

Almost, half of the trips made by two wheelers, cars, autos, buses and metro lie between 23-30 minutes

TRIP TIME FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION- PURPOSE WISE PURPOSE WORK EDUCATIONAL RECEATIONAL SHOPPING OTHER

HOUSEHOLD - PURPOSE WISE TTFD CUMULATION 0-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 >60 0 5 25 49 75 88 90 0 3 34 61 83 93 95 0 2 20 49 61 78 80 0 5 26 60 89 91 93 0 29 43 62 71 86 100

PURPOSE

MEDIAN TRIP TIME 30.1 22.6 30.2 24.0 21.1

WORK 100 EDUCATIONAL 100 RECEATIONAL/SOCIAL 100 SHOPPING 100 OTHER 100 Around half of the trips for education, work, shopping, social and recreational purpose lie between 22 to 30 minutes.

HOUSEHOLD ANALYSIS

2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS

SOCIO ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS

PCTR (overall) PCTR (walking trips) PCTR (motorised trips)

=0.80 =0.12 =0.68

AVERAGE TRIP LENGTH (ATL)

1% 8% 3%

1% 4%

2-Wheeler Car Bus Metro MMTS Auto NMT Cab

34%

28% 21%

Average Trip Length 30

25.36

16.69

20 15

7.8

8.1

9.2

2-Wheeler

Car

Cab

12.27 7.57

VEHICLE OWNERSHIP Vehicle ownership V/s frequency of trips made by Metro

Bus

Metro

MMTS

Auto

AVERAGE TRIP COST (ATC)

Only car

24%

Average Trip Cost

Only 2-wheeler Both Car, 2-Wheeler

66% Neith Car nor 2-wheeler

155.4

180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0

63.89

85.14

63.03 52.68

Vehicle ownership V/s frequency of trips made by Taxi 29

Only Car Only 2-Wheeler

2-Wheeler

Car

Cab

Bus

Metro

MMTS

Auto

AVERAGE TRIP TIME (ATT)

21%

Both car, 2-wheeler

71%

DESIRE LINE DIAGRAM

Average Trip Time 60

48.03

50 40 30

Vehicle ownership V/s frequency of trips made by IPT

24.55

30.56 33.04 34.07 30.97

13% 14%

23.43

30%

10 0

2-Wheeler

Car

Cab

Bus

Metro

MMTS

Auto

43%

• The total number of trips counted as per the primary data collection(sample data matrix) of both origin and destination is 966. • After the extrapolation of sample data, the extrapolated O-D Matrix total number of trips are 9,20,892. • The more number of interchange TAZs are observed as 21-23, 2225, 44-93, 46-93, 50-57,62-63, 64-79, 77-79.of internal TAZs.

HOUSEHOLD ANALYSIS 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

MODAL SPLIT

TRIP RATE

EASY COMMUTE & SHE TEAM BUS ROUTES

Transportation

Motorized

MMTS

2-wheeler

Metro

Bus

4-wheeler

Mini Bus

Metro

Cycle

private

Public

Non motorized

She Shuttle/easy commute

Walk

Para transit/IPT

Setwin

contract carrier

Stage carrier Ordinary

Cycle Rickshaw

Airport Magic

7 Seater auto

Bike Taxi

3 seater auto

Traveller

Taxi/cab

3 seater auto

EASY COMMUTE

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IN HYDERABAD METRO •

•

Metro In Hyderabad runs on PPP model operated by HMRL, there are total 3 routes which includes 57 stations having route length of 67km. There are 2 routes in our study area which includes 11 stations having route length of 17km.

TSRTC BUSES • • • •

Telangana State Road Transport Corporation (TSRTC) is a state-owned corporation that runs transport services within the Indian state of Telangana. TSRTC is operating 10,460 buses from 97 Depots. There are 364 bus stations in the State. The total bus stops identified in our study area is 130. Total Number of Routes is 3,653 while routes identified in our study area is 10.

• • • •

No. of routes– 140 and total buses are 150 (15-20 AC & Rest Non-AC) Ridership details - 4508 people per day Fare details - Rs. 3 per km Timings - Morning Time (7 Am to 12:30 Pm), Evening Time (4 Pm to 8:30 Pm)

•

An exclusive transport system for the working women professionals in the IT Corridor. It runs from 8AM to 11PM duly integrating with company security and WhatsApp Control Room. 802 passengers availing services, with 33 users on an average trip. The shuttle services has covered 357 Kms overall and has 1972 registered women commuters.

SHE TEAMS •

MMTS •

•

Sub-urban rail which is operated by South Central Railway, total 26 station having route length of 43km. Our study area includes 7 station having route length of 17km.

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION : INTRODUCTION 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CLASSIFICATION

On board P.T. User Survey 62 46

11W

Mythri Vanam

Wave rock

Commercial

195W

Bacchupally

Wave rock

Commercial

113M/W

Uppal

Wave rock

Commercial

217 A

Patancheru

Koti

219

Patancheru Secunderabad

218

Patancheru

127K

Koti

Major Activity Centres Cyber towers, Panjagutta Wipro Circle, Mindspace

Fleet Size

TOTAL HYDERABAD

15-30

31-45

Age groups (years) 2%

Education 17% Recreation Social 76%

Others

0 0-10000

11%

10000-20000

24%

20000-40000 40000-60000

3% 45%

Above 60

To estimate the total boarding alighting demand within study area To evaluate the pattern of the passenger flow within study area 93

100 50

0-5 06-10 11-15 Waiting Time (Min) 3%

3% 2%

14%

10% 1%

2-W

Cab Bus

Frequency/ Trips/Day Hour

PAX Alighted

PAX Boarded

10 5 16%

Auto

0% 2%

Cab 81%

Walk

ATL of Passenger

PASSENGER BOARDING ALIGHTING (Route 222L)

2-W

Headway (min)

6 24 15.4 130 70 460 15.2% 154 84 15 hours AC, Metro, Ordinary

Avg. Travel TimeMin

Minimum Route Length(Km) Maximum Route Length (Km) Average Route Length (Km) Total No. of Bus Stops Total Bus Network (Km) Total Road Network (Km) Bus Network Coverage Total Route Length (Km) Overlapping Length (Km) Hours of Operations Type of buses

79%

Walk

Bus

39 10 219

Auto

60000-100000

STUDY AREA

Route Bus Route Bus Length (Km) Stop No Length (Km) Stop No

46-60

3 0

Mode Used For Egress

Income wise trips Trips Purpose From

Predominant Land use

Female

9 8

0-14

443

0 0

Work

Route S.No. Number

Male

Mode Used For Access

Age sex profile

80 60 40 20 0

10 bus routes 10 bus routes

Bus capacity Total number of Bus routes Total bus Fleet Size

Avg. Pax Pax/Rout PHPDT per Trip e/Day

Lingampalli Chanda Nagar Gangar Ram Huda Colony Deeptheri Sree Allwyn Colony Hafeezpet MMTS Hafeezpet Kondapur Kondapur Metro Paulo Travel Kothaguda Jayabheri Hitex Kaman Shilparamam Hitech City… Hitech City Metro Image Garden… Madhapur Petrol… Madhapur Police…

Boarding Alighting Survey

PURPOSE

Passengers (%)

SAMPLE COLLECTED

LOCATION

Waiting Time (min)

SURVEY NAME

Passengers (%)

S. NO.

Passenger Carrying Vehicle Occupancy Load KM per Seat KM Capacity KM Ratio Factor Hour KM

00:10

7.3

3420

228

1664.4

3042

4680

0.5

0.4

00:10

37.2

9.3

3060

204

1897.2

108

4212

6480

0.5

0.3

00:15

52.2

12.7

2520

168

2133.6

1716

2640

1.2

0.8

Commercial

Gachibowli X Roads Lingampally railway station

00:30

32.6

10.8

1860

124

1339.2

1872

2880

0.7

0.5

Mixed

JNTU

00:15

53.6

13.4

4920

328

4395.2

3744

5760

1.2

0.8

Koti

Commercial

Mytri vanam, JNTU

00:20

58.3

14.7

1755

117

1719.9

2808

4320

0.6

0.4

Lingampally

Commercial

Image Hospitals

180

00:05

40.6

10.3

5220

348

3584.4

2808

4320

1.3

0.8

180

00:05

46.2

11.5

113

20340

1356

15594

2808

4320

5.6

3.6

10H

Secundrabad

Kondapur

Commercial

Cyber towers, Image Hospitals

216

Koti

Lingampally

Commercial

HYD University

00:15

10.3

720

494.4

2340

3600

0.2

0.1

222L

Koti

Patancheru

Commercial

Cyber towers

00:15

54.3

13.6

5760

384

5222.4

2028

3120

2.6

1.7

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION : TSRTC BUSES 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

TSRTC Bus Route Map

Metro Capacity (per train) Min. Cost of Travel

PHYSICAL & OPERATIONAL PROFILE Parameters Hyderabad Study Area Operator Stakeholders Stations Route Length Daily Ridership No. of Lines No. of Stops

HMRL (Hyderabad Metro Rail Limited HMRL, L&T and Government of Telangana 65 11 72 Km 17 Km 4 Lakhs 98312 3 2 65 11

126 seats 10 Rs

Max. Cost of Travel

60 Rs

Hrs of Operation

06:30 - 23:00 Hrs

Red Line : Miyapur to LB Nagar

27 Stns

Blue Line : Nagole to Raidurg Green Line : Falaknuma to Parade Ground

22 Stns 8 Stns

User Characteristics 2%

Frequency of Trips

Occupation of Metro 3% Users

3.12% 4% 1%

Income Range of Metro Users

Travel Purpose 2.04%

4.07%

30%

21.85 %

0% 0%

No. of Metro Users

26%

68.93 %

62% 83%

Business

Pvt. Service

Govt. Employee

Wage Labour

Unemployed

Student

Monthly

Retired

House maker

Weekly

Daily

28% 24%

25% 20% 14%

15%

10% 5%

Fortnightly

Work

Education

Occasionaly

Social

Recreational

25%

Upto 5000

5001 10000

0% 10001 - 20001 - 30001 - 50001 - Above 20000 30000 50000 100000 100000

Income Range

Others

Issues Identified • • •

Maintenance Issue • No PT Connectivity • No seating area inside stations

• Congestion Problem • High fare Low Frequency of Trains •

Ticket Scanner Issue Voice Recognition not work

Trip Details Trip I-I I- E E-I E-E Total

Operational Characteristics 1%

Mode used for Access

Mode used for Egress

11%

16.00

10%

13.86

14.00 12.00

42%

47%

Trip Details

27%

30%

•

10.00 7.00

8.00 6.00

9% 1% 2W Bounce 3-Wheeler Metro Shuttle Walk

1% 2%

2W Ola/Uber Bus Ola/Uber

2-Wheeler Car/Jeep Taxi

0% 1%

2W Bounce 3-Wheeler Metro Shuttle Taxi

4.00

11%

3.04

2.00

1% 1% 2W Ola/Uber Bus Office Cab Walk

2.50

2-Wheeler Car/Jeep Ola/Uber

0.00 ATL (in Km) Access Trip

Avg. Unit Cost (in Rs)

Main Haul Trip

Egress Trip

%age 22.93% 19.13% 56.45% 1.49% 100.00%

Hyderabad’s city hub, commercial and major IT firms lies in our study area which shows major E-I trips which is 56%.

Station Name

Miyapur

3.93%

7.60%

Residential

JNTU College

11.53%

2.17%

Residential, Public & Semi-Public

KPHB Colony

8.55%

5.97%

Residential

11.40%

3.26%

Commercial, Residential, PSP

2.31%

2.04%

Kukatpally Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Balanagar Moosapet

6.65%

3.53%

Residential

Bharat Nagar

3.53%

1.90%

Commercial, Residential

Erragadda

3.26%

5.02%

Commercial, Residential

ESI Hospital

3.53%

3.93%

PSP, Residential

HITEC City

14.38%

1.36%

Commercial, Residential

Raidurg

10.31%

5.29%

Commercial, Residential

Attraction (%) Production (%)

Landuse

Commercial, Residential

METRO ANALYSIS

2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

HYDERABAD METRO PROFILE

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

PARKING : • •

Images showing Dedicated Parking in the City

Off-Street Parking Analysis

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

Parking problem in Hyderabad comes in the traditional commercial areas where there is no provision of parking spaces or organised development. Lack of proper and adequate parking spaces, vehicles are parked on the road side haphazardly and thereby reducing effective carriageway for vehicular movement, increasing road congestion, accidents and air pollution. To plan for the future parking needs and to manage the situation, a systematic study have been done to access the parking demand.

•

Images showing Informal On-Street Parking in the City

Location Miyapur Metro Station Area of Parking Lot 1 Acre Vehicle Type 2W 4W Load 22887 5407 Volume 1144 429 Capacity 700 85 Avg. Parking Duration 10 Hrs 9 Hrs Parking Index 4.67 9.09 Source: Primary Survey

Demand & Supply

The dedicated parking lot is not enough for present demand. Hence, public are using adjacent land illegally for parking. Parking Accumulation of Vehicles

The parking lot is dedicated for metro users.

Parking Location Map

Parking Duration (4W)

Parking Duration (2W)

No. of Vehicles (ECS)

1000 800 600 400 200 0

1%0%

27%

• •

0% 73%

Time 4W

99%

•

Less than 2 Hrs

2 Hrs to 4 Hrs

Less than 2 Hrs

2 Hrs to 4 Hrs

4 Hrs to 6 Hrs

More than 6 Hrs

4 Hrs to 6 Hrs

More than 6 Hrs

Vehicle Type

Existing Demand (ECS)

Existing Supply (ECS)

Gap (ECS)

847

700

147

895

810

Large parking gap for 4-Wheelers For the existing condition, Parking is in lack which is equal to 147 ECS for 2Wheelers & 810 ECS for 4-Wheelers. Better parking lot management and parking policies are needed to manage the present situation.

PARKING ANALYSIS

2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

• •

Congestion along the road with commercial activity due to on-parking activities is very common. Informal on-street parking have been studied to understand the problem. Location

Bala Nagar

KPHB

Industrial, Com, & Res.

Surrounding Landuse Length of Stretch (in m) Parking Type Vehicle Type Parking Load (Vehicles) Peak Accumulation (Veh) Parking Volume (Veh.) Parking Volume (ECS) Average Parking Duration

Miyapur Road – (AMB)

ICICI Bank Road

Commercial, Residential Commercial, Residential

Kukatpally Main Road

Commercial

Miyapur – (Police Station)

JNTU X Road

Commercial, Residential Commercial, Residential

PSP, Com, & Res.

400 Perpendicular 4W 3W 2W 453 278 715

300 Perpendicular 4W 3W 2W 117 59 437

450 Perpendicular 4W 3W 2W 106 11 565

250 Perpendicular 4W 3W 2W 125 65 936

160 Perpendicular 4W 3W 2W 153 130 636

500 Perpendicular 4W 3W 2W 348 271 528

400 Perpendicular 4W 3W 2W 75 91 402

112

134

219

131

133

94 94

76 46

171 43

53 53

53 32

282 71

30 30

13 7.8

100 25

61 61

44 26

308 77

70 70

60 36

384 96

182 182

134 80

264 66

11 11

58 35

183 46

4.82

3.66

4.18

2.21

1.11

1.55

3.53

0.85

5.65

2.05

1.48

3.04

2.19

2.17

1.66

1.91

2.02

6.82

1.57

2.2

Source: Primary Survey

Parking Accumulation of Vehicles

4-Wheeler

Time Interval 3-Wheeler

No. of Vehicles (ECS)

30 20 10 0

2-Wheeler

Kukatpally Main Road

4-Wheeler

60 40 20 0

4-Wheeler

Time Interval 3-Wheeler

2Wheeler

60 40 20 0

4-Wheeler

2Wheeler

100 80 60 40 20 0 10:30 - 11:00 - 11:30 - 14:00 - 14:30 - 16:00 - 16:30 - 17:00 11:00 11:30 12:00 14:30 15:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 Time Interval 4-Wheeler

3-Wheeler

2-Wheeler

Parking Accumulation of Vehicles

Time Interval Auto/LCV

2Wheeler

Parking Accumulation of Vehicles 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

10:00 - 10:30 - 11:00 - 11:30 - 12:00 - 12:30 - 13:00 - 13:30 - 14:00 - 14:30 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00

Time Interval 3-Wheeler

100 50 0

11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 14:00 14:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 14:30 15:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00

4-Wheeler

•

4-Wheeler

150

Time Interval 3-Wheeler

2-Wheeler

Conclusion

JNTU X Road

Parking Accumulation of Vehicles No. of Vehicles (ECS)

No. of Vehicles (ECS)

Time Interval Auto/LCV

Miyapur – (Police Station)

Parking Accumulation of Vehicles 100

Parking Accumulation of Vehicles

50 40

ICICI Bank Road No. of Vehicles (ECS)

Parking Accumulation of Vehicles

No. of Vehicles (ECS)

70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

Miyapur Road – (AMB)

KPHB No. of Vehicles (ECS)

No. of Vehicles (ECS)

Bala Nagar

•

On-street informal parking creates problems to the running traffic on road by creating congestion as it cover some portion of carriageway. They generally cover the footpaths which makes pedestrian to walk on the carriageway. Such problems need to be solve to facilitate public.

2-Wheeler

PARKING ANALYSIS 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

On-Street Parking Analysis

Bio-Diversity T Park Circle Junction connects different areas i.e. Raidurg Pan Maktha and Gachibowli Village, L.B.Nagar Junction, Karmanghat, and Champapet areas. The Road from Bio-Diversity T Park passing through Champapet, L.B. Nagar, Ibrahimpatnam, and Chinthallkunta is a direct connective and easy passage for the local travellers and residing people. These above said roads are full of traffic throughout the day and contain heavy proportions of private vehicles namely cars and two wheelers (70%). The traffic volumes are very high exceeding a figure of 10324 PCU/hour for nearly 50% of the time in a 12-hour day period.

•“Currently, the average time taken to reach the ITC junction (near iLabs) from Jubilee Hills Road No. 45 is between 25 to 30 minutes. Once the bridge is operational, the commute time will come down to less than ten minutes,”

SOURCE : TOI-GHMC OFFICIALS

•The total length of the bridge, including approaches on both ends, is a little over 764 metres of which the cable-stayed segment is around 426 metres long. The approach viaduct and solid ramps are around 338.53 mt long while the bridge is around 18 metres wide. It will also have 1.5 metre-wide footpaths on both the sides.

Road Widening and Multilevel Flyover plan at Bio-Diversity T Park Circle

SOURCE: Report of SIA, SIM(SRDP)

ONGOING DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

Bio-Diversity T Park Junction towards Hi-Tech City and Gachibowli.(2.14KM)

ISSUES

Road Network Analysis Map

. Poor road Infrastructure and traffic congestion are the two main burning issues. About By the 60% inferences followed study, in Manufacturing units and Special of the from roadsthe in study area are increase unfit for pedestrians. Development Zone in the study area leads to increase in the trip attraction rate in those areas.

Ineffective utilization of road space-On street parking, Encroachments on roads,

usage of sidewalks. inappropriate Few TAZs which are lack of easy reach ability from the inside links to the nearby major arterial roads are for Public Transportation. There free cycles at Metro station but city doesn’t have dedicated cycle tracks and

2.8KM

continuity in the tracks . RECOMMENDATIONS

1.4KM

City roads lack uniformity and footpaths lack continuity.

 Based on the results, the core area has already low LOS i.e. LOS D & E in the nearby links, RECOMMENDATIONS there is atracks chanceshould in increase of traffic density the major links nearby is recommended Cycling be provided alonginthe roads. Hence near itthe residential and for the road widening.

1.3KM

institutional areas, like in JNTU, Kukatpally for the safe and efficient movement of students

 Provision of commuting byFootpaths cycles.. distributed within the buffer of 400m from arterial roads and provision of Bicycle for theofpeople are travelling beyond 800m distance from the arterial Road widening majorwho congested corridors like Gacchibowli-Miyapur Road road. of 6.8 km length should be done in order to incorporate smooth traffic flow. There are few industries located in the study area, especially in ward 1,2,5,6,7 and 9 where

2 KM

dedicated lanes should be provided for the movement of commodity vehicles, as they interrupt with the regular traffic movement, and result in conflict. It is recommended to build several new links with multi-lanes near the major establishments like the IT Parks in Hitech City, and Telecom Nagar to provide connectivity to these activity centres which have huge potential to attract large number of commuters in future. The encroachments along the major roads in the study area especially along MiyapurSource – author generated from primary survey analysis

Bolaram Road should be taken care as it proves to be a hindrance in smooth traffic.

SOCIO ECONOMIC

ISSUES

The income levels of the people is moderate to high with high rate of vehicle ownership. This is the main reason for the high share of private transport in the study area . As the majority of the trips in the study area are work and educational trips and major share of population are young, an increase in travel demand can be expected in the future . The high share of trips by private vehicle has resulted in high traffic volumes and low vehicle

RECOMMENDATIONS Providing sustainable and reliable pubic transport facilities. Integrating various Public Transport modes (Metro, MMT, Bus) in order to have effective and efficient network of public transport. To provide first and Last mile connectivity by providing feeder and DRT services and proper NMT infrastructure like footpaths, cycle tracks, cycle docks etc.,

speed on major roads.  Share of public transport in the study area is low and is majorly confined to the low to moderate income groups.

ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

ROAD NETWORK ISSUES

ISSUES:

Poor road markings

•

Unsafe pedestrian movement

•

No infrastructure for NMT Poor road conditions of the local street

•

More number of identified blackspots in the study area

•

ADJACENT LAND USE

MIN. OBSTACLE FREE WIDTH

Near residential or mixed use areas

1.8 m

Near commercial and mixed use areas

2.5 m

Shopping frontages

3.5 – 4.5 m

Bus Stops, Railway stations or transport terminals

3 -4 m

High Intensity commercial areas

PARKING



Good road markings are

The Refuge island refers to the gap

•

On-street Parking creates congestion problem.

an essential component of

in the median provided for safe

•

High Parking Demand at Metro Stations

a road infrastructure for

movement of pedestrians.

1. RECOMMENDATION FOR CYCLE TRACK

end of a median meeting an

found in many intersections

intersection or crossing where

We can notice there is negligible number of

there are poor road

people generally crosses the road.

cycle tracks in the study area. The tracks

markings which are not

which are also provided cannot be utilized by

regularly maintained .

Images showing horizontal and vertical clearances for footpaths



formality shake which cannot be used in

LOS TABLE FOR PEDESTRIAN FLOW

practical condition.

Off-Street Parking

Adequate parking and circulating area for linking with other modes of transport at Metro Stations (By HMRL) • Provision of 7 floor multi level parking with ground coverage of 1 acre (assuming 35 sqm per ECS) • Parking provision on ‘First Come First Serve’ basis  Set appropriate parking fees (as management tool) • Pricing must vary per zone and per demand levels • Fees should be proportional to vehicle size • Fees should be proportional to the duration of the parking event

Design flow in persons per hour Width of the side walk in meters

On-Street Parking • •

Short Term and Free Spots : Generate free parking spots to access to the city centres shops by increasing the vehicles rotations Loading & Unloading Areas: Ensure parking availability for carrier to avoid trucks double parking

In both directions

the intersection . So, this can be used as an alternative for safe pedestrian crossing.

All in one direction

LOS B

LOS C

LOS B

LOS C

1.8

1350

1890

2025

2835

1800

2520

2700

3780

2.5

2250

3150

3375

4725

2700

3780

4050

5670

3.5

3150

4410

4725

6615

3600

5040

5400

7560

•

This design of road is yet to be practiced in study area in any of

the cyclists as they are made only for

3. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PARKING : Recommendations :

It is generally provided towards the

During our survey, we

 



safe pedestrian movement.

ISSUES & RECOMMENDATIONS 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE •

2. RECOMMENDATION FOR SAFE PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT

Recommended Pedestrian clearances

Recommendation

BHEL Township Junction, Existing Scenario

(Source- Primary)

(Source- Secondary)

Current Scenario, MIG Auto Stand near BHEL Township

Current Scenario, Lingampally Bus Stand

TSR (terminate-stop-reside) stand with provisions for auto rickshaw and maxi cab parking, to be used for pick up and drop off.

Lingamapally bus stand, improved by providing saw tooth bays (12m X 3.5m) for parking, along with space for ticketing kiosks, chart room, conductor's rest stops.

Roundabout

Space for ticketing kiosks/ chart room, restrooms (Source- Secondary)

(Source- Secondary)

(Source- Primary)

 Channelizing island put to use by providing a reliable car parking, a halt and go facility, a drop off point and a subway connection

List of shortcomings addressed 1. Lack of pedestrian space. 2. No provision for crossing. 3. No delineated parking. 4. No pick up/ drop off points 5. Improper use of road shoulder 6. Concentration of traffic 7. No separate provision for IPT . 8. Improper or no use of channelizing island. 9. No provision for buses. 10.No room for roadside activity zone.

This island can be used for landscaping and other roadside activity or for hawker occupation if need be.

Channelizing Island

(Source- Secondary) (Source- Primary)

RECOMMENDATION:BHEL TOWNSHIP JUCTION 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

Recommended Junction improvement along with signalized junction kept intact near BHEL Cross road where traffic weaving is being observed. The old Bombay highway is left intact for reasons of traffic congestion.

• • • • •

Improper or no bus shelters at many stops. No dedicated bus lanes causing risk to other vehicles and pedestrians. Buses in old and poor condition. Not user friendly for people above 45 years of age. Congestion at specific routes during peak hours.

Recommendations •

•

Bus fleet size to be increased in route no 10H and 222L as the load factor and Occupancy ration are high during peak hour. Limited stops bus services can be run to reduce average travel time in 218, 219, 222L bus routes as the average trip length of passengers is high. Frequency can be reduced in route no 127k and route can be altered in 216 bus route to increase the occupancy. Frequency could be increased in the non peak hours for the users aged above 45

MMTS Issues: • • • • •

Connectivity to major part study area is lacking The infrastructure of stations are not adequate Low frequency of train approx. 30min Location of the stations No connectivity with other public transport.

METRO Issues: • • • • • • •

No connectivity to many part of city No Public Transport Connectivity Congestion High Fare Low Frequency of Trains No seating areas at station Improper working of Ticket Scanner and Voice Recognition Machine

Recommendations(By HMRL) • •

• • • •

Phase I: MGBS – Falaknuma Phase II: i) Raidurg – Gachibowli – Shamshabad RGI Airport ii) Nagole – LB Nagar iii) Lakdi ka Pul - BHEL All stations will have efficient feeder bus services ("Merry go round" air conditioned buses) Effective integration & interchange with rail terminals at Nampally, Secunderabad and Begumpet Efficacious integration & interchange with bus stations at Miyapur, Dilsukhnagar, MGBS, Jubilee Bus Station, Rathifile, Koti and Falaknuma Link to MMTS services at Bharatnagar, Begumpet, Khairatabad, Lakdikapul, Malakpet and Falaknuma

Recommendation: • • • • • • •

Proper infrastructure building services of MMTS by government so that public use it Securing the area from station to main road Linkage with other modes of public transport( BY SCR) 292km of expansion of mmts ( by SCR) Linkage with metro station (BY SCR) Feeder services to provide next mile connectivity

IPT

Source: Author generated

Recommendation IPT:

IPT’s are sharing a reasonable share of travel demand in Hyderabad, there is very little understanding of their • roles, potential and constraints. • Issues: • • Some part of study area is lacking in paratransit modes • Stage carrier running only on very few routes • • High cost of contract carrier. • • Very few fixed stops . • Absence of proper planned routes, stops for para transits • Prone to accident • Over occupancy during peak hour. • No End mile Connectivity •

Increase in number of fleets, routes for stage carrier Regulating the cost of contract carrier Keeping a check on overloading to avoid accidents Making some new fixed stops . It is important to recognize the role of paratransit and incorporate them in the planning and development process.

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: Issues & Recommendations 2019-2021 | SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE , BHOPAL

Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Study, HI-Tech City, Hyderabad

TSRTC BUSES Issues:

Thank You