PetrSumaArchPortfolio_JAN2013 by Petr Šuma

PETR ŠUMA I ARCHITECTURE I PHOTOGRAPHY I DESIGN

Rotterdam, Netherlands

curriculum vittae

PETR ŠUMA Born 16.4.1990 in Pilsen, Czech Republic EDUCATION SEP 2009 - JUN 2012 Bachelor degree on Faculty of architecture CTU Prague, Czech Republic SEP 2001 - JUN 2009 Mathematical grammar school Pilsen, Czech Republic SEP 2008 - JUN 2009 Art school in Pilsen, Czech Republic SEP 1996 - JUN 2001 Elementary schoool Tremosna, Czech Republic EXPERIENCE - Awarded for student project “Theater in Garden” in Oloveny Dusan competition, project was showcased on architectural websites - Internship in Fusion Architects studio in Prague (JUN 2011 - JAN 2012) fusionarchitects.cz - Competition “CASUA WORKSHOP” for exhibition space in new CTU building in Dejvice - Part-time job as an professional wedding and prom photographer in photo studio Fotosvět (JAN 2011 - JUN 2012) - Instructor of Adobe Photoshop software in Adobe Academy of Sillicon hill club - Internship in ZCU (west bohemian university) in Pilsen, creating 3D model of the human head (autodesk 3Ds max) as a part of complex system development of audio-visual speech synthesis SKILLS - Architectural study - Construction drawings - Site design - Small scale urban design - Realistic vizualizations - Photography - Postproduction photography - Graphic design

SOFTWARE - Autodesk Revit - Autodesk Autocad - Autodesk 3ds max - Adobe Photoshop - Adobe InDesign - Adobe After Effects - Adobe Premiere - Adobe Lightroom - Google Sketchup - Rhino - Grasshopper3D - Vray rendering software - Microsoft Office LANGUAGES - English (fluent) - German (intermediate) - Spanish (basic) - Czech (native)

Brandenburg, Germany

content

architecture

photography

design

visual effects

ar chit ecture

design studio ATBP - Roman Koucký a Edita Lisecová

prague archaeology museum This site is very complicated, it is the interface of two different urban principles. Old city structure of Malá strana and latter structure of Karlin from 19th century. This results in enormouse amount of impulses from surrounding area, I tried to pick only the most importnat ones for me. The most important is accentuation of the connection between new building and the City of Prague Museum, new museum will serve as an complementary building to the old one and it is still going to be same institution. I placed the current museum into the center of my design, circles from this center will influence not just the volume of my design, but also landcaping of the area between both museums. Prague archeology museum is imaginary coming from ground as lot of archeological artefacts does. From the whole volume of site coming up is by one of the circles created void area, serving as an public space in front of the entry to museum. This cut will create different type of facade, which will showcase the museum to the outside world, especially using potential of North-South highway going through the city right next to the site of new museum. Important for my project is also history of this place, especially railway station Těšnov, which has been here before and was torn down because of highway in 1985.

Main urban design idea for this project was to refer to the old museum building and thereby clearly show the connection between these buildings. For that I used system of circles with museum in its center. One of these circles created southern facade of my museum. These circles will be readible also in materials of public space and sidewalks around both museums.

DIAGRAM for visitors

For this project I used double skin facade, with corten steel for the external layer. By punching different size of holes in to the corten steel, I am able create various images reffering to the archaeology and in place reffering to the legacy of TÄ&#x203A;ĹĄnov railway station. In exactly the same place where original arch was, I recreated it, in the corten facade.

FACADE concept

SITE plan

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

SITE concept

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

Longitudinal section

THIRD floor

SECOND floor

FIRST floor

FACADE detail

340

2450

4580

prvek

6200

2020

600

200

4700

200

350 900

5700

4100

1300 900 1300 900 1300

4100

900 350

3050

3400

7850

500

15900

500

2950

200

6600

3000 1100 500

7850

3000

5900

500

1620

500

1100

3000

2050

2100

200

6600

300

200

13550

+13,900

de h= ska 30 0m m

6650

+14,200

27450

7850

500

900

500

2020

3000

200

900

1400

1100

7700

5200

8000

27600

11870

2100 2050

2300 200

3600

4000

4200

4000

+13,900

7850

4000

1100

500

7700

3600

1100

500

7700

200 2300 200

3000

300 0

8200

1100 1100

6000

1100

300 100

350

300

2100 5300

1450

200

±0

2020

200 3950

900 1500

SCH 2970-U-1

150

300

900 900

300

200

6200 SCH -U-1

+13,900

550 2020

300

1300 200 2450

900 350

1900

6200

+14,200

Pražské archeolog muzeum

6000

5900

2020

6100 200

4150

+14,200

4200

1100

8200

1900 300

300

A 8200

500

10250

7700

H.U.D. +7,000 S.U.D. +6,700

8200

+13,900

300

300 100

4070

500

300 550

100 550

+14,200

550

2100

8200

300 0

150 0

2050

100

150 0

2050

150 0

500

1100

4000

500

1100

4000

500

1100

500

3000

150 0

4000

151 0 300 0

1100

500 1100

150 0

3000

1400 200

500

1100

00 15

1100

4200

6600

200

500

6600

1100

3000

11150

6600 5200

200

8950

8000

9850

2020

+14,200

2020

200

8200

2100

2050

900

300

200

2250

2100

2020

900

7850

500

18620

4100

2020 3400

1100

200

1790

200

3050

2100

500

2950

2100

6600

200

5400

2050

1100

6600

2100

2000

200

2000

výšk

180

6670

6400

8000

200

6670

4700

úhel[°]

SCH-U-1 30

12150

900

540

2020

1200

900 1300

2020

900 1300 1750

1950

2380 1230

3950

200 1800

430

200

4580 900

12000 500

1100

4700

7700

3000

7850

200 4870

00 15

8200

900

3750

6600

300 0

150 0

6570

Výpis prefabrikátů

200

140 0

150 0

1800 300

3000

450 8000 150 0

500

340 200

200

16200

2020

8000

2000

900 2020

2020

6330

10250 2100

2050

2050 2020 2020

1090 900 900

200

530 2120

900

2020

3250

1100 900

200

2050 200

1950

8230

8000

2970

900

8200

49400

49700

200

2950

2100

800 900

1140

12530

2100

SCH -U 2970 -1 SCH -U-1

2950

200 1700

2020

16400

0 30

3150

2000

8200

880 900

H.U.D. +7,000 S.U.D. +6,700

6100

1790

2020

7850

1100

3970

4000

1100

200

8000

200 1930 200

8000

6100

7700

SCH -U-1

350

200

4000

50 1200 1200

2970 100 300

200 1700

SCH -U-1

3100

200

6100

500

3000

1100

200

300

200

3750

H.U.D. +8,970 S.U.D. +8,770

200

3900

+10,300

+10,600

500

2100

8200

4700 2100

8200

6600 1100

H.U.D. +7,000 S.U.D. +6,700

2050

6300

12150

500

1100

3000

6300

4200

200

1930

1800 300

3050

500

6200

300

1100

300

H.U.D. +8,970 S.U.D. +8,770

3000

3500

H.U.D. +8,970 S.U.D. +8,770

8200

Praha 8, Těšnov 8200

ústav

8200

102800

vedoucí práce

doc. Ing.arch Roman Kou

vypracoval

obsah výkresu

STRUCTURAL drawing SECOND floor 12

6200

+31.800

4300

10 9x

7 16

/ 27 0

100

350

4850

5800

500 100

350

2050

1100

200 300 4650

0 2477

5600

500

1600

1100 500 5600

6700

500

500 500 2750 350

500 100

350

200 2050 300

1100

4650

22700

5600

500

1600

1100 500 5600

6700

500

550

100

350

100

5NP 10800 4NP

200 2050

3NP

300

1100

+7.200

+6.700

3600

4450

500 6700

500

500 6700

6NP

7200 1600

1100

500 2750 350 500 2750 350

6700

2NP

-9.000

-6.000

-3.300

-9.800

200 2250

det.E

-6.300

1PP -6000

-6.000

2PP -9000

-9.000

-6.300

-9.000

-9.800

0,00= 0 1NP -3000

300 2500

-3.000

2700

300

500

2500 500

+0.000

-0.500

-3.000

-3.300

-0.200

300

-4.500

-4.800

-7.500

100 350

19 / 27

5800

6900

3600 3600

/ 27 0

9x 167

7 16

37 / 27

300

9x 167

-1.500

-4.500

/ 27 0

+13.900

2700

55 / 27

+1.570

100

167

7 16

+7.200

+6.700

7NP 18000

+1.800

/ 27 0

+5.170

350

+14.400 +14.200

3PP 800

-10.500

11 167

2700 300

200 -9.000

230

2700

-7.500

-7.800

+5.400

+8.770

+14.400 +14.200

+13.900

+8.300

800

2700 300

-6.000

2770 230

2700

-4.800

119

14400

800

300 -4.500

2770 230

-3.000

+9.000

-9.800

5200

-11.300

3700

3PP

2500 300

4000

-0.500

300

2PP -9000

-0.200

500

+0.000

300

1PP -6000

1270

1NP

11 11

3100

0 0,00=

-3000

+12.370

2500

200

+3.600

6700

2NP

+12.600

300

141

300 2700

+15.970

+21.400

+15.500

650

11 11

3100

500

108

+16.200

+21.600

+21.100

4680

+7.000

+6.700

+21.600 +21.400 +21.100

2050

200

+7.200

163

+19.570

2750 350

3100

500

11 11

+19.800

6700

200

130

185

500

+23.170

4000

300

200

11 11

3100

100 350

300

152

8NP 21600

+22.700

25200

+23.400

2700

207

300

+26.770

2700

11 11

3600

300

174

strecha +27.000

3600

229

3600

200

11 11

3600

3300

3100 196

300

+10.600

+10.300

3NP 3600

11 11

300

+10.750

3100 500

7200

+13.900

300 200

+14.400

3100

4NP

218

300 200

+17.500

+28.500 64

3100

+18.000 +17.800

+14.200

10800

3100

500 500 3100

500

29700

5NP

+21.100

3100

200

+21.600 +21.400

6NP 14400

+24.700

100 350

500 P5

7NP 18000

300 200

+25.000

3100

21600

+25.200

300

8NP

240

3300

300 3300

25200

28800

+28.800

300

strecha

2050

+28.800

3000

+29.800

3000

+29.700

900

det.A

3000

28800

Pražské archeolo muzeum Praha 8, Těšnov ústav

CONSTRUCTION drawing Longitudinal section

vedoucí práce

doc. Ing.arch Roman K vypracoval

This project was bachelor thesis at the Faculty of Architecture at CTU. Part of the project was not just developing the concept idea but also creating construction documents, structural plans, details, static calculations etc. It obviuosly had some influence on the project in the latter phase and it slightly changed, but I was still able to retain the original ideas from the architectural study.

D 14660

+34.710

4600

300 3400 7400

6900

4850 7400

3500 300 3200 7200

6NP

6700

4650 7200

29700

3500 500

200

+14.400 +14.200

7200

6700

4NP

3NP

14900

2050

500

3600

7200

6700

2NP 0,00= 0 1NP

-0.200

-7.800

2PP -9000

15000

2700 300

3000 3000

100 350 300 100 350

-7.500

-10.500

1PP -6000

-4.500

-4.800

-3000

500 4300

-0.500

4000

100 350

300

+0.000

2700 300

800

300

1950 300 2050 17%

300 2050 650

350

+6.700

4650 500

500 100

350 300 300

300 -6.300

-9.000

100

350

17%

+7.200 +7.000

2050

7200 2500 300 2700

-3.300

-6.000

100

2020

8300

4680

6700 300

3000 1

-3.000

650

18 x 167 / 270

+0.000

1270

3PP

-0.200

-0.500

2050

-7.730

230 2770

18 x 167 / 270 -7.500

5NP 10800

4650

+13.900

7200

22700

5600

6700

14400

300

500

1600

18000

3700

500

2050 500

7NP

500

1600

1100

2700

3000

-4.730

15000

+21.600 +21.400

+21.100

7200

300 3000 37

2700 300

-4.500

230 2770

18 x 167 / 270

2700

230

-1.730

14500

+7.000

+6.700

4680

7200

200 2020

2500 300

det.B -1.500

2PP -9000

7200

500

+7.200

200

8200

7700

0 0,00=

1PP -6000

2050

1100

1600 5600

7200

6700

3500

+7.000

1NP

21600

+8.300

3600

-3000

5600

7200

5600

7200

6700 200

+14.200

+13.900

3200

3700

+14.400

300

200

29700

3500 29700

3NP

2NP

5800 1600

1100

1600

200 300

500

200

+21.400

+21.100

3200

300

+21.600

25200 8NP

+15.500

4NP 7200

900

6200 3300

3000 7400

5800

6900

6900 3500 3700

6NP

10800

strecha +28.500

14400

28800

+29.700

+22.700

7NP 18000

+28.800

300

300 600

300

8NP 21600

3400

4600

25200

300

+29.700

900

100

det.A

strecha

5NP

5900

+31.800

28800

3PP P3

800

-9.800

-11.300

P m

CONSTRUCTION drawing TRASNSVERSE section

úst

ved

vyp

patrový rozvaděč

G vedeno nezakryté pod stropem vedeno v dutinové podlaze

vedeno v podhledu

E vedeno v dutinové podlaze

vedeno v podhledu

patrový rozvaděč

vedeno v dutinové podlaze

COORDINATION drawing SECOND floor B

Pražské archeol muzeum

Praha 8, Těšnov ústav

vedoucí práce

doc. Ing.arch Roman vypracoval obsah výkresu

SITE plan

ar chit ecture

design studio ATOS - Jan Aulík

theater in garden Building or even designing anything to monastery garden of such an important monument as Emauzský klášter is, one must be very careful and cautious and have a great humility. Current state with tennis courts in monastery garden is absolutely outrageous and I am trying to fix it. My primary goal is to reinforce strengths, especially the monastery and its garden. Mass of my building is basicly formed by the surrounding environment, I obey street line of neighbouring building. From west is my limitation the eastern wall of monastery, I am not crossing the line of this wall and this is my way to respect the historical monument of monastery. In the same time I am building up to the same height as surrounding buildings. This project is bringing new function into the neighborhood, theater, it is an initiatory building. This project was awarded in student competition and showcased on architectural websites.

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

SOUTH elevation section

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

WEST elevation

BASEMENT floor FIRST floor SECOND floor

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

evel 4 /8" = 1'-0"

ar chit ecture

design studio ADS3 - Emily Koenig

kansas state boathouse My design is formed by two basic elements, program and site. First the program of the buliding. The main purpose of building is to create an enviroment for the womenÂ´s rowing team. Because the boats are long and thin, the buliding also becomes long and thin to mimic this shape. Since the buliding is for watching the 2000m rowing race, I placed the buliding as an extension of this race. So, the pathway of the race is the basis for the line which defines the building. As the race proceeds, viewers will see the race in its entirety. The interior of the upper floor is well suited for viewing with a small amphitheater. The rowing tank for practice is also directed to this view, so that the racers may see the race line during practicing for motivation. The long walls which are parallel to this view define the view of the race. Articulated long walls from exposed concrete creates a frame for both the race and the surrounding nature, primarily the water. As a connection to the row team, the inner length of the building is 1863 inches. This length is derived from the year that Kansas State University was established. On an almost spiritual basis, the energy from the race is supposed to terminate and flow through the structure. To reinforce this strength of the race, I felt that concrete was a logical choice in material.

Entrance 525.94 SF

View Terrace, Team Meeting 3017.17 SF

The space between building and parking is intersection of two elements. The water is represented with the direction of race which is the direction of building and the other set of lines represent the slope downwards based off of contour lines. Both elements are represented, geometrically as well as materially. Lines extending direction of a house are interrupted with spaces parallel with the the direction of contour lines. Details around the water elements are done in very similar manner as the Boathouse.

vel 1 16" = 1'-0"

section

office 290.87 SF

electric 214.72 SF

reception,lounge 1796.85 SF

education center 1882.68 SF

mechanical 702.77 SF

FIRST floor

EAST elevation

NORTH elevation

WEST elevation

ar chit ecture

05 My design of castle rock building is derived mostly from surronding environment. Main idea is to continue and extend the rock looking up on the castle rock in front of it. As the rock consists from different shapes and stones, my proposal consists from many pieces as well. I used several elements to shape those pieces, every building has an view on at least one of the points of intereset. Most important is obviously the Castle rock, therefore all of the front suites has an view towards the Castle rock monument. If it is not possible to ensure view towards the main monument, I tried to ensure that there is another point of interest to see, for example the big rock or trees, both existing or new ones.

design studio ADS3 - Emily Koenig

castle rock retreat I divided the program of building to have inside a single stone (building) one or two suites. Reception with a lounge and bar is in the biggest rock. Next to the biggest rock is the discovery center, which I designed as an interactive exhibition. Buildings structural material is concrete, but I chosed rainscreen double facade with a cor-ten steel as a visible material. To even more evoke the extension of the long cliff rock, I decided to shape the rainscreen part of a facade to remind organic shape of stone. But I still wanted to keep the walls straight, therefore I designed different length of metal supports holding the cor-ten steel.

www.auto

Consultant Address Address www.autod Address Phone

Consultant Address Consultant Address Address Address Address Phone Address Phone Consultant Consultant Address Address Address Address Address Address Phone Phone

Consultant Consultant Address Address Address Address Address Address Phone Phone

Level 1 tisk 1/4" = 1'-0"

Consultant Consultant Address Address Address Address Address Address Phone Phone

FLOOR Floorplan Plan 1/4”=1’-0” 1

Level 1 tisk 1/4" = 1'-0"

Consultant Address Address Address Phone

No.

Des

No.

Desc

---

section Section 1/4”=1’-0” 3

Section 1 tisk 1/4" = 1'-0"

Ow Section 1 tisk 1/4" = 1'-0"

Projec Ow Unn

8' - 0"

Project

www.autode

8' - 0"

Project Number Date Consultant Drawn By Address Address Checked By Address Phone Project Number

Copy of South tisk 1 1/4" = 1'-0" 1

Section 3 tisk Copy 2 of South tisk 1/4" = 1'-0"

1/4" = 1'-0" South Elevation 1/4”=1’-0”

Section 2 tisk 1/4" = 1'-0"

Date

SOUTH elevation 2

Section 3 tisk 1/4" = 1'-0"

current situation 2

East tisk 1/4" = 1'-0"

Section 2 tisk 1/4" = 1'-0"

using maximum available volume

shading the volume and defining surrounded area

The house I designed consists of two boxes, one inside the other. The inner one is a private space, unlike the bigger one, which is very transparent and public. The outer box is shaded by a rainscreen facade, which varies due to different sun angles. In southern direction the shade screen is very dense and doesn´t let in the summer sun, but allows the winter sun in. The rainscreen facade also creates varies spaces around the house. On the west, before the entrance, it creates very intimate space. On the east the rainscreen goes to the pier and orients the whole house towards southern view of toher islands.

Consultant Address Drawn ScaleBy Address Address Checked By Phone

Consultant Address ScaleAddress Address Phone

Unna

Consultant Address Address Address Phone

East tisk 1/4"Elevation = 1'-0" East 1/4”=1’-0”

Consultant Address Address Address Phone

Stuart Island Retreat I Design Studio Emily Koenig I Fall Semester 2012 I Petr Šuma

No.

Desc

ar chit ecture

design studio ADS3 - Emily Koenig

stuart island retreat The house I designed consists of two boxes, one inside the other. The inner one is a private space, unlike the bigger one, which is very transparent and public. The outer box is shaded by a rainscreen facade, which varies due to different sun angles. In southern direction the shade screen is very dense and doesnÂ´t let in the summer sun, but allows the winter sun in. The rainscreen facade also creates varies spaces around the house. On the west, before the entrance, it creates very intimate space. On the east the rainscreen goes to the pier and orients the whole house towards southern view of tousing maximum her islands.

ar chit ecture

design studio ATBS - Roman KouckĂ˝ a Edita LisecovĂĄ

residential house Designing resedential building into the central area of Prague was very interesting project. The location cleared pointed out that appartments will be very luxorioous, especially the ones in top floors with view over the beautiful landscape of red roofs of Prague and therefore one of the requirements was to achieve maximum floor area possible. I was supposed to design 6 storey building with a footprint of 24 by 24 meters, but from west and east there were another bulidings, in total 12 buildings next to each other. Another requirement was to keep in mind the real demand for appartments, which on the other hand was in favor of small and cheap flats. My final proposal exactly meets these requirements. In bottom floors I have small studios or one bedroom appartments and towards the top, there are bigger appartments, two or three bedrooms appartments. In the top two floors are 4 luxorious appartments with gorgeous views towards Prague.

Západní pohled

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

SIXTH floor

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

SEVENTH floor

TENTH floor

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

section

SOUTH elevation

NORTH elevation

ar chit ecture

design studio ZANII - Hana Špalková and Martin Augustin

my personal retreat This project took place in Divoká Šárka, natural reserve on the northwestern outskirts of Prague. You can find steep rocks, extensive meadows as well as romantic valleys with a stream flowing through. One of my essential concept was to respect this beautiful nature and fit into perfect environment. I was supposed to design an object, which would be possible to use throughout the whole year. Because of the nature of the surrounding environment I decided to work with more volumes, creating gradation and merging with adjoining rock.

First floor

section

Second floor

Third floor

site plan

a r c h i t e c t u re

design studio ZAN - Hana Ĺ palkovĂĄ and Martin Augustin

art under ground The building in this project is formed of three elements adn their intersection underground. In a block 15 metres wide and long and 9 metres tall is inserted helix, which is all exhibition space and the art is displayed on the sourrounding walls of the original block. To bring daylight into the gallery, I have cut a hole in the middle of helix, with traingular prism. This prism rises above ground and creates interesting glass construction.

First floor

Section

Third floor

v is ual e ffe c t s

digital visual effects in architecture

the architecture student Second project for Digital visual effects in architecture seminar was about explanating Le Corbusiers Ronchamp chapel with motion graphics. Video was composited of real life footage from university library and rendered animation of 3D computer model in Autodesk 3ds max. Footage was filmed with DSLR camera, motion tracked and composited in Adobe After Effects with sequences of animated chapell and motion graphics created in After effects and Illustrator. On this project I was collaborating with Scott Davis and Winston Wolf. Film is on vimeo website (https://vimeo.com/52918675).

v is ual e ffe c t s

digital visual effects in architecture

left behind Final project for Digital visual effects in architecture seminar was about presenting piece of architecture through a story. Our idea was based on contrast between timeless architecture and through out the time corroding bike left in that architecture. For this purpose we picked Barcelona pavillion from Mies van Der Rohe and showed this architectural masterpiece through different year seasons. This project was done with Scott Davis and Winston Wolf. https://vimeo.com/55448324

v is ual e ffe c t s

for architectural studio fusion architects

visualizations

v is ual e ffe c t s

computer graphics courste at CTU

visualizations

product design

art class at CTU focused on modeling objects

my signature

My goal was to create an 3 dimensional project, which could be my logo or signature. It is based on the similarity of my second name with a notion of mathematical symbol. “Šuma” is similar to “suma” (summary in czech), therefore I used mathematical symbol for sum as void around which I am building five prisms. Five because there are five symbols in my second name: S u m a and ˇ . According to importance of each of them, I decided the height of each prisms.

Kimbell art museum, Dallas, TX

Central station, New York, NY

photography

digital SLR camera and various lenses

photography

Central park, New York, NY

Brooklyn Bridge, New York, NY

Cloud gate, Chicago, IL

Lincoln Memorial, Washington D.C.

The Chicago Theater, Chicago, IL

Chicago skyline, Chicago, IL

Munchen, Germany

Brandenburg, Germany

The Strip, Las Vegas, NV

Empire State Buliding, New York, NY

Golden Gate Bridge, San Francisco, CA

THANK YOU suma.petr@gmail.com